Welcome to the Church of Reality. Welcome to the Real World. The Church of Reality is a positive force for change and you can be part of it. You can help make it happen. There is a lot of material here. We hope you will invest the time to read it. The short version of what the Church of Reality is about is:
Reality is our God
Science is our Bible
Evidence is our Scripture
Big History is our Creation Story
Ecology is our Theology
Integrity is our Salvation
Positive Evolution is our Mission
The Church of Reality is a religion based on the practice of Realism, which is a dedication to the pursuit of the understanding of objective Reality. Our motto is, "If it's real, we believe in it." Since no one knows all of Reality, the Church of Reality is a religious commitment to the pursuit of Reality the way it really is. We think about thinking. We wonder about wondering. We try to understand the understanding of understanding. We are Explorers, not followers. The phrase "What is Real?" is our Sacred Question and the word "Reality" is our Sacred Message. We talk about Reality, think about Reality, and aim to make Reality more important in society.
The Church of Reality is based upon the Authority of Evidence
rather than the Authority of Scripture
Reverend Reality Speaks!
The Church of Reality is Religion 3.0. Religion 1.0 was about the authority of elders. Religion 2.0 was about the authority of scripture. Religion 3.0 is about the authority of evidence. This is a process we call the Evidential Reformation. We attempt answer the great questions that other religions address, like what is right and wrong, what is the meaning of life, how do people live together in a community, and what are our responsibilities to ourselves and to each other. We address these concerns in the context of Big History, our present Reality, and our future evolution. We are particularly focused on the future, which we call the Sacred Direction.
What we consider real is based on knowing rather that choosing to believe something. The difference between knowing and believing is knowing is based on the scientific method, which we call the Sacred Method. We use evidence, proof, logic, and reasoning to determine what is real. That doesn't make us infallible, sometimes we get it wrong. But when we realize we are wrong we change our minds because we have a value system that puts Reality first.
The Church of Reality is about making a religious commitment to the pursuit of the understanding of Reality as it really is.
We are Monorealists, which means we believe in The One True Reality. This Reality is the sum of everything that actually exists. Our definition of Reality includes what some people call "other realities" that actually are real with the exclusion of imaginary realities and religious fiction. We care about what is real, not what we think is real or what we want to believe is real. The Church of Reality puts "real" Reality first.
The Church of Reality is not just a religion of science, it is a religion of people understanding Reality through science. We explore Reality from the human perspective. In order to explore Reality, we need a strong, healthy society where people can live freely and peacefully, have more Telescope Time, and the human race can evolve toward a better future. The pursuit of Reality is something that is a shared process. It's something we do together as a church, as a community, and as the human race.
We are about Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Reality!
The Church of Reality provides a religious identity for people who have made a personal commitment to pursue Reality the way it really is. When we are asked, "What religion are you?," we answer that we are Realists; we practice Reality because we believe in Reality. We also provide a sense of community, a social structure, and a moral compass to define right and wrong. We provide a sense of purpose about who we are, why we exist, and how we live our lives, in the context of science and logic.
We are of One Planet - we are all here together - and we are committed to making the future better than it is today. We are committed to making sure humanity evolves in a positive direction.
The Church of Reality recognizes the fact that the human race has a vast amount of shared knowledge. We call this shared knowledge the Tree of Knowledge, and it is through the growth of this tree that we can explore the universe around us. As the Tree of Knowledge grows, we evolve toward a better tomorrow, one where we will know more about Reality than we know today. Realism is not just a casual acceptance of Reality as real. Realism is a deeply felt choice, a commitment to a disciplined approach to determine what's real and to allow us to evolve in a positive direction.
The Church of Reality is an evolving religion. We are not tied to a fixed doctrine that was written in the past and is slowly becoming obsolete. If we get it wrong, we fix our mistakes. We are an Open Source Religion and everyone is welcome to participate in the development and improvement of our religion. We live on a vast wondrous universe that we are just beginning to explore. Why would someone want to waste their entire existence on a fictional world view when there's all this wonderful Reality to investigate and understand?
The Church of Reality is an Emergent Religion. Just as apples grow on apple trees when humanity evolves to a certain level something like the Church of Reality must occur. Humanity has two paths. We can either evolve forward or we will become extinct. We will either Stay in the Game or we will be Left Behind. Since we were created through the process of evolution and our ancestors all the way back to Pond Scum did what it took to survive, we are programmed by evolution to try to continue to exist. We therefore accept, through evolutionary bias, that to exist is better than to not exist. In order to continue to exist we have to evolve forward and we need to be in Right Relationship with Reality to do that. And that defines the mission and the purpose of the Church of Reality, that humanity should continue to exist and evolve forward so that we stay in the game. Our descendants should look back at this time and be thankful we did what we do here today. Otherwise, if we do the wrong thing, they might regret what we do today, or there may be no one around to look back. We will be forgotten.
What is Reality?
Reality is that which when you stop believing in it - it doesn't go away. ~ Philip K. Dick
Are you already a Realist? - Do you find yourself thinking about Reality? Do you think that it's important that what you believe in is actually real? Do you think for yourself rather than just believe what you are told to believe? When you counsel friends on important matters, do you advise them to take Reality into consideration? Do you believe the world would be better off if Reality were a more important part of society? if you answered YES to these questions, you may already be a Realist.
“A religion, old or new, that stressed the magnificence of the Universe as revealed by modern science might be able to draw forth reserves of reverence and awe hardly tapped by the conventional faiths. Sooner or later, such a religion will emerge.” ~ Carl Sagan
If you like what you see, then join our Mailing List to get the latest announcements. We also appreciate those who link to us and review the Church of Reality in their blogs. We have a good religion started here. All we need is people to spread the word about it.
Church of Reality Introduction Podcast Listen Now!
The ideas presented here on this website are mostly the work of Marc Perkel, founder of the Church of Reality. Unlike other religions the Church of Reality is not infallible. The concept presented here are an attempt to explore the meaning of meaning. Everything that you will read here is incomplete, and can be improved. Different people have different aesthetic preferences and some people will find ideas and concepts here objectionable, such as using the word Church. And a lot of the material here will be proven to be just plain wrong.
Having said that, this is a serious attempt to explore an area where scientists are often uncomfortable. There are those who think that there is no meaning or purpose to Reality, that nothing matters. These people think that any attempt to define value in scientific terms is fundamentally flawed that meaning has no meaning.
But if nothing has any meaning then why is getting the right answer better than getting the wrong answer? Why is 2+2=4 a better answer than 2+2=3? If the right answer is a better answer than the wrong answer then that can become the basis for a value system that comes from Reality itself. Right is better than wrong. The purpose of the Church of Reality is to try to discern this value system and see if we can understand who we are, what we are, and what we are supposed to do with our lives.
So - there are plenty of things to find wrong here, but there are plenty of things to find right. Think of it more as a work in progress and if there is something you don't agree with, think of how you would make it better. To that end I unvite you in. Let us explore Reality together.
Introduction:
What does the Church of Reality contribute to the religious community? How does it relate to other religions? Religions are often defined in relative terms. For example, what is a Seventh Day Adventists? The short answer is that they are a form of Christianity that is somewhat unique in that they (correctly) identify the Sabbath as occurring on Saturday instead of Sunday. Thus the name "Seventh Day". Many are also vegetarians and fear that in the end times the government is going to come in and make them worship on Sunday at gun point.
Our name is our mission. We are the Church of Reality
So - what defines us? Who are we in relation to the rest of the world? Where does our religion come from? How do we fit in to the big picture?
Unlike most religions we are not a splinter group of some other religion. The Church of Reality has it's roots in Atheism, Humanism, and Science. Atheism isn't a religion but a statement about reality; about the non-existence of God. Humanism is the basis for building a social structure and determining right and wrong in the absence of some holy text declaring the will of mythical deities. It also has roots in Free Thinkers who seek an understanding of the real world.
Just as a whale is a mammal that looks like a fish, we are a religion that looks like science.
The Church of Reality is a very different kind of religion. A whale, for example, is a mammal, but it looks like a big fish. Similarly the Church of Reality is a religion, but it looks like Atheism, Humanism, and Science. In order to understand Realism you have to throw out your preconceptions about religion. Just as a whale is a mammal without fur, we are a religion without faith and dogma.
This religion was invented from scratch as a natural religion making a commitment to reality as it really is. Like Seventh Day Adventists the name is the predominant feature of the religion. The purpose of the Church of Reality is focused on the understanding and the pursuit of reality itself. It is a reality based religion.
In its short lifetime the Church of Reality has developed a lot of religious concepts that are unique among religions. We are happy that we can contribute new and unique concepts about belief systems and it is our hope that other religions steal our ideas. We look at religion as an evolutionary process and within that process there is some inter breeding of ideas and concepts. One might look at the doctrine of the church as DNA and we want to share our DNA with other religions and pick out the good stuff that they have already figured out. In that respect we don't require that all the people of the world convert to Realism. If we can contribute doctrine that is picked up by other faiths then we have made a better future.
Reality Based Religion - Every religion has a basis. Most have some holy text which describes a deity and miracles and grand stories and commandments and such. These religions are "faith based" and you are generally required to accept it without proof. The Church of Reality is a reality based religion and it is based on what is real. A religion that is based primarily on the commitment to the pursuit of reality the way it really is represents a new world view. We call it Accepting the Truth. It offers a religious choice that few other religions offers.
Fundamental Commitment to Real Reality - The Church of Reality is a fundamentalist religion that is dedicated to an absolute loyalty to the pursuit of real reality the way it really is. Many religions are reality friendly but allow for individual opinion to be superior to objective observation. As Fundamental Realists we take a more humble position about our understanding of reality by assuming that everything we believe is either wrong or at least incomplete and can be improved. We are after all a highly limited biological computer that injects a lot of ego noise into our perception of the universe.
Reality is not a human construct that becomes whatever we believe it is. Humanity is a reality construct and we become what reality deems us to be. Through us reality becomes aware of its own existence. Our relationship to the real world is fascinating beyond belief and that any time we let our egos obscure pure reality we cheat ourselves out of the holy grail of the possibility of perfect understanding. It is a quest beyond achievement, yet something that we commit ourselves to accomplish. If humanity spent and infinite amount of time pursuing pure reality and stayed true to the purity of the quest, then after an infinite amount of time we might be successful. If however we allow our ego to make our opinion more important than reality, then even in infinite time we will fail to achieve the purpose and cheat ourselves out of the ultimate conquest. To become one with the real world.
This is the Church of Reality, not the Church of Reality-ish Belief. The name is the mission. There are people who think reality is boring, but those people are not Realists. There is nothing more exciting to us than the pursuit of reality the way it really is.
A Religion that Makes Sense - Reality itself has consistency. It all fits together. It is something that makes sense. Reality is testable. It invites logic. The Church of Reality is a mirror of reality itself and (if we stay true to our missions) has the consistent properties of reality. The world view of Realism doesn't conflict with what we observe in reality itself. It doesn't require that you have to cheat on the objective level to explain your beliefs. It doesn't rely on magic and miracles or omnipotent deities who can operate outside the bounds of science. We don't ask you to suspend rationality. We don't ask you to accept information that can not be questioned. Realism makes the inner scientist smile.
Humanity based Religion - You can't explore without an explorer. Who is the explorer? We are. At least that's the way it is on this little piece of dust in the universe that we call Mother Earth. As we humans progress forward in our evolution from what we were to what we will become we increase our abilities to explore reality the way it really is. Thus the Church of Reality is the exploration of reality by humans, and the positive evolution of humanity is necessary for progress to be made. The exploration of reality and the progress of humanity are the same thing.
Realism is a Discipline - Our mind is a tool. It's not a very good tool, but it's all we have to work with, so the better we learn how to use it, the more progress we will make. Realism is the understanding of understanding. How do we rise beyond self delusion? How do we sharpen our minds? How do we come up with new innovative ideas and expand the horizon of understanding? How do we network with other minds to increase our collective mental abilities? We learn how to see through the fog. We try to understand ourselves and each other so that we can become the tools of exploration that we need to be in order to increase the sum total of human understanding. To grow the Tree of Knowledge. In order to do this we adhere to the disciplines of science.
Doubt Based Religion - Most religions are fiction based and require you to accept on "faith" without question that their premise for existing is true. The Church of Reality takes the opposite point of view. We are a doubt based religion believing that truth will stand the test of scrutiny and that the questioning of everything is a required process for discerning what is really real from that which is just bullshit. In our religion there is nothing that can not be questioned. We think faith is something you earn by accepting doubt and proving that you are trustworthy. We think that anything that you are required to believe without scrutiny should be considered to be false.
Upgraded Religion - The Church of Reality is more like a software upgrade for both Atheism and all other religions. It's more accurate to see us as an update rather than a conversion.
Atheism is focused on the Biblical deity and Atheism is ultimately about nothing. Realism, in contrast, is about everything. Atheism doesn't give any guidance as to the meaning of meaning or what we are supposed to do when we wake up in the morning.
All religions are about how to live in the world. Where does right and wrong come from? How did we come to be? What is our purpose? But the answers are usually based on old teachings that become more and more obsolete with each passing year.
The Church of Reality addresses these question deriving its answers through logic and science. Meaning actually does have meaning and there is right and wrong and there's formulas for determining what right and wrong are. (or at least a probability spectrum)
Tree of Knowledge - Although this name has been used in other religions no other religion has recognized the importance of the sum total of human knowledge in a religious context. The Church of Reality embraces the growth of human knowledge as one of its axioms. Most of what we know we know collectively, not individually. In fact the sum total of human understanding is one of the key indicators of our evolutionary advancement.
Positive Evolution - Although a brighter future in itself is not something that is new, the idea of making it the moral compass of a religion is a new concept. The Church of Reality accepts that our survival and progress is preferable to extinction and gives it a central role in church doctrine. We recognize that one can not advance the understanding of reality without the progress of society. We not only have concluded that evolution is real, but realize that only in taking control of our evolution can we pursue the goal of exploring reality as it really is.
The Sacred Direction - The Sacred Direction is forward, making the Church of Reality a Futuristic religion. Most religions are Dogmatic religions looking back to the good 'ole days starting in paradise and the future ending in destruction. In contrast we look towards the future and marvel at the possibilities of what we can learn about reality and what we can accomplish for the good of humanity by harnessing reality. Most religions look backwards in time towards what they believe is ancient wisdom. Our world view is that our best wisdom is yet to come. We believe in Futurism, not Dogmatism.
The Church of Reality focuses on the future, not the past.
The Power of Vocabulary - The human race is linked together through a complex set of agreements that is sustained through vocabulary. Some people say that you are what you eat, or you are what you think. We think that perhaps you are what you talk about. It is our vocabulary that binds us together as a society. Words and phrases convey meaning and establish common references. These common references trigger standard thought patterns that come from our shared understanding of reality. Through language we learn who we are, how society works, and our relationships with the people around us. Language is how we connect into the social fabric of humanity. It is what defines who we are as a community. If we change that language we can change civilization. We therefore consider our Terminology to be very important and we speak in the Vocabulary of Reality.
Intellectual Tithing - An important concept first introduced here as a religious concept is Intellectual Tithing, which is the contribution of knowledge to the sum total of human understanding. Our religion recognizes the giving and the sharing of knowledge as something that is at the heart of human evolution. We are creative and we share our ideas for the benefit of everyone as they share their ideas with us for our benefit. The ideas that we contribute to humanity becomes our immortal legacy if we do anything worth being remembered for. The sharing of ideas is like a holy sacrament in the Church of Reality.
Lawrence Krauss
The difference between Science and Faith
Faith - The Church of Reality is not a faith based religion. We are a doubt based religion. Faith is actually prohibited and doubt is required in the Church of Reality. We believe that truth is purified through doubt and that anything that is required to be believed without questioning is assumed to be false. We believe that all truth will stand up to scrutiny. Because things believed by faith can not be tested there is no way to distinguish what is true from what is not true.
Earned Trust - The Church of Reality takes a strong position against "blind faith" and says that if one is expecting to be believed that they have to earn it by being trustworthy and accepting scrutiny. Faith that is required without proof or where doubt is prohibited is considered to be bullshit. Most of what we know is based on trusting relationships with people and organizations who have developed a reputation for scientific discipline.
Vectored Answers to Important Questions - Unlike many other religions the Church of Reality doesn't answer questions but rather specifies the correct process for determining the answer. For example, the short answer to the question, "Does the Church of Reality believe in an afterlife?" is No, we don't. But the long answer is that our position represents the current consensus of the secular scientific community on the subject that they have determined through the disciplines of the scientific process. We recognize that we don't have answers to questions that no one knows, and that as our understanding of the world evolves forward that our position will reflect that evolution. Our answer to "What is Real?" is whatever free science has determined what is real.
Communion - We don't pray together, we contemplate together to share ideas and explore the reality we all exist in. In our tradition any time two or more people gather to talk about reality, that is communion. When we talk about reality with those of other religions we are sharing communion with them.
We are Monorealistic - Our world view is Monorealism in that we believe there is only one true reality, not multiple realities. Our reality includes all realities that are actually real and is the sum total of everything that actually exists. We contrast ourselves with the polyrealistic religions that believe in multiple realities without regard to whether or not they are actually real.
Nothing Supernatural - The Church of Reality rejects the idea that there is anything that is supernatural, magical, or miraculous in the sense that the impossible occurs. We think that everything has a basis in science. We don't have explanations for everything because we know that there is a lot we don't know. There are things that are real that we don't yet understand, but there is nothing that happens that is outside of reality. There is only the reality we know and the reality that we don't yet know. But it's all within the scope of reality. Because nothing supernatural is real, we can guarantee that you won't go to hell.
Artificial Intelligence Compatible - If humanity ever produces a super intelligent computer that is far smarter than we are, and that computer can rewrite its own code and goes through an existential crisis asking "What is the meaning of artificial life?", the goal of the Church of Reality is to have an answer that is so scientifically sound that the AI would conclude that we are on the right track. The Church of Reality is also a Religion for Robots.
Free will and Agency - Our view is that we do have free will and agency and that we not only can make choices but that we actively own our story and are responsible for our choices.
Intrinsic Value of Humanity - The Church of Reality accepts as one of our axioms that all people have intrinsic value and that we Respect the intrinsic value of ourselves and others. This is the basis for our view that we are equal citizens of one planet, that we have the intrinsic right to Self Ownership. That we consider human rights to be sacred, that all war even when necessary is fundamentally wrong. We express our love of humanity through our commitment to Positive Evolution to ensure that tomorrow is better than today. We are Realists because people are important to us.
Self Ownership - Realists own their own lives. We don't belong to God, Jesus, or Mohammed and we are not subjects or property of the nation states we reside in. We believe in individual rights and responsibility and respecting the individual rights of others. We assert the rights to freedom and liberty, the dignity of the individual, and the assertion that the only purpose of government is to serve the population that gives it power. Self ownership includes the right to control one's life, one's death, one's own medical decisions, the right to birth control and abortions, and the right to personal privacy. Self Ownership is also a personal religious commitment for people to take control of their own lives, to think things through for themselves, and to actually exercise personal choice and make sure that their decisions are their own and not those of an oppressor.
Human Rights - While members of most religions strongly support the human rights and the protections and freedoms that every person is entitled to, the Church of Reality has incorporated those right within the heart of our religious texts. Other religions are based on ancient texts that lacked a concept of individual liberty, self ownership, and the intrinsic value of the individual. In fact, many religious texts accept slavery and human sacrifice as normal behavior. We don't. We incorporate freedom and liberty into our religious doctrine.
Responsibility and Accountability - Responsibility and accountability are the cornerstone of Realism. Unless a deity shows up there is no omnipotent father figure to fix our mistakes. If we screw up, we screw up. We are responsible and accountable in that we realize that we have control and that our actions have consequences. Maybe some day space aliens will show up with welfare packages but we can't count on that. We don't believe in a God that forgives our sins allowing us to go out and sin knowing that we will be forgiven. If we do something wrong then we have to live with the consequences of that. And if we do something right then we get the benefit. There aren't any outside influences that are rigging the game. We therefore accept this responsibility and aspire to live the kind of lives that we can be proud of.
Religious Law - The Church of Reality has a very large and detailed Kernel which is the operating system of the human race. In it we assert a variety of religious rights and freedoms that we require to practice our religion. Many nations create special exception in their laws for religious practices. Because we are evolution based we take advantage of religious law to advance our cause of exploring and evangelizing reality.
Religious Identity - The Church of Reality provides a religious identity to people who believe in reality the way it really is. Many Atheists and scientists who have lacked a religion are able now to have a religion that they can identify with so they can say what they do believe in rather than just what they don't believe in. The Church of Reality is the religion of what is real, not what is not real.
We are Thinkers - Most religions put value in blind faith and trust and using emotions as a basis for seeking the truths of the universe. We are a doubt based religion that put value in thinking and exploring the reality around us. We think that everyone can become smarter than they are now and that thinking is good exercise for the brain. We are a religion that puts value and incorporates thinking and logic into the core of our religious doctrine. We honor innovation and invention and consider the accumulated knowledge of humanity to be sacred to us.
We also think that thinking has healing powers for the mind. Whenever someone is thinking about reality it reprograms their brains away from fiction based belief to reality based belief. We want to make thinking cool again.
Contemplation instead of Worship - Most religions come together to worship fictional deities. That becomes the cultural tie that binds their religion together. The Church of Reality uses the Sacred Contemplations to bind our religion together culturally. We explore reality together with our minds rather than stunting our mental evolution with the limitations of faith based thinking.
We Find Solutions - The Church of Reality is a solution oriented culture. We figure out a way to make it happen. We do tech support for the human race. If a problem has a solution, we'll find it. And if there is no solution, we'll still figure something out. We are innovative and resourceful and we like being clever and accomplishing things that no one else can accomplish. Our religion, a religion based on reality, has been called an impossible task. But we are here to accomplish it in spite of whether or not it is possible because it is something that we must do, and we must be successful. Because if we can't make reality work then we're all in trouble.
Building Bridges - The Church of Reality is not an "us vs. them" religion. We are a religion that builds bridges. We are here to help everyone else evolve in a positive direction by making reality part of the discussion. We also look for the opportunity to learn things from others to see if they have good ideas that we can adapt to improve ourselves. Some cult based religions separate themselves from other drawing lines to separate us from them. We are the opposite. We try to tear down the lines, find common ground, and view all people as us.
Evolving Doctrine - Our religion isn't static. We have an evolving and forward looking doctrine that is expected to change and improve. That will keep us from being stuck with and aging holy book that becomes more outdated with each passing year. Our Kernel is always considered to be in development and we expect that we will make mistakes, but we are committed to correcting our mistakes as we find them.
Conversion and Evangelizing - We do not measure our success by the growth in our membership and we are not dedicated to saving the world by converting everyone to Realism. We are a religion of ideas and a religion of the mind. We think that reality itself is a Sacred Message and it is our goal to inject reality into the human equation to help all people evolve into better people living in a better society.
It is not necessary for us to get believers in fictional deities to give up their fiction. We just want to assist other religions in incorporating reality into their culture and help them focus on a positive future so that they are a more productive member of the human community that a threat to civilization. Our world view is that whenever a person is thinking about reality that they become a Realist in that moment and that the world becomes a little better place because of it. We evangelize reality by discussing reality and getting more people to think about reality more often. By taking small steps forward in the right direction the whole world gets a little better, a little bit at a time.
Equality of Women - The Church of Reality does not force women into an unnatural role. We do not stone women to death. Women are not the property of men. Wives are not subservient to their husbands. Women are not considered to be unclean during their period. We have no requirements for chastity. Women are not required to pretend that they are something they aren't. Women are 100% equal participants in our religion and have an equal right to Own Themselves. The Church of Reality actively opposes those who would oppress women.
Furthermore the Church of Reality considers the oppression of women to be morally wrong. We oppose any laws that treat men and women differently. In our world view women should have access to the same resources as men. This rights include the right to equal education, health care, the right to dress as they want, to drive cars, to go places unescorted by men, to decide reproductive issues themselves including a right to have an abortion, the right to vote, the right to server in public office, and equal protection under the law. Furthermore women are entitled to additional rights regarding pregnancy and child bearing in order to accommodate their unique needs as females.
Guilt Free Sex - Unlike most other religions the Church of Reality has few restrictions on sex. These restrictions include sex with children, rape and other forms of forced sex, and sex that involves exploitation and behaviors that are harmful to society. Sex must be consensual. The Church of Reality has no marriage requirement so words like adultery and fornication do not apply to our religion. Sex outside of a committed relationship is only wrong to the extent that you are violating promises made and not kept. Infidelity would be an issue under honesty, and not under sexuality. Some couples choose to have multiple partners.
We do not associate sex with sin. There is nothing immoral about sex outside of marriage. Marriage is not relevant in any way with respect to the morality of sex. Sex between people of the same sex is no less moral than sex between heterosexuals. Our position on sexuality is that it is a personal choice and that the individual has a right through Self Ownership to make their own sexual choices. We are therefore officially disinterested in sexual morality.
Marriage - Traditional marriage is not part of the Church of Reality culture. The traditional institutions of marriage are historically based on deity based sexual morals and are geared towards reproducing heterosexuals only and not the needs of non-reproducing heterosexuals, late life marriages, and homosexual relationships. Much of marriage law it written around the concepts of generations and inheritance of property. Marriage used to include a lifelong commitment but most nation states have no-fault divorce laws that seem to negate the very core concept of marriage as a lifelong commitment.
Many religions struggle with the issue of same sex marriage and our religion is no exception. Ultimately our answer didn't come down to the equality question, because homosexuals are fully equal in our religion, but rather do we try to fit everyone into the same mold offering a state marriage to everyone equally when state marriage laws and traditions are designed to serve only one class of citizen. Our answer is that traditional marriage offers a "one size fits all" solution and doesn't meet the needs of our membership. We therefore do not officially offer it to anyone. We will in time develop our own form of union where the individual couples can tailor their own union based on their own agreements that suit their unique relationship.
Homosexual Relationships - Being homosexual or homosexual acts are not considered to be either immoral or sinful in the Church of Reality. Gays and lesbians are full participants in the Church of Reality. Sexual orientation is not considered to be an issue in our religion.
Virgins - We're not obsessed with virgins or virginity. We're not really even interested in the subject. In the Church of Reality virginity is not any sort of big deal. Some people are virgins, some aren't. Virginity is a personal choice. We are equally disinterested in both male and female virginity and neither has to worry about becoming a human sacrifice to a deity. We do not believe that you will be offered as a prize in the next life because someone killed a lot of people in the name of a deity.
Abortion - The Church of Reality is a pro-abortion religion. Our world view is that a woman has an absolute right to control her own reproduction. We do not have a fetus obsession like some other religions. Personhood begins at live birth. The world is overpopulated and it's irresponsible to add to the population problem by forcing women to give birth against their will. Women have the right to write their own life story, to have control over their own lives, to own themselves. Reproduction is a personal decision and it is the right of the woman to make it.
Atheistic Altruism - We establish a logical reason for being generous and selfless and caring about the well being of others in the context of reality, thus refuting the idea that Atheists are selfish. Humanity's success is based on sharing resources and taking care of each other and forming strong and healthy communities. Generosity is part of human evolution and is necessary for our common survival.
Good and Evil - The Church of Reality looks at good and evil as being choices rather than forces or entities. It is more related to short term thinking and selfishness rather than good and bad entities that influence people. We believe that the individual is responsible for their own behavior.
No Holy Prophets - The Church of Reality has no holy prophets. I, Marc Perkel, founder of the Church of Reality, has no special powers, is not divine, and there is nothing at all special about me except that I am an ordinary guy who came up with the idea. I didn't invent reality, reality invented me. People are just people and we do not worship anyone. If this church is successful there will be people in the future who are far smarter and wiser than I am, who are also not to be worshiped or given excessive social status. As will all of you most everything I know comes from the Tree of Knowledge and I am just building on the work of billions of other people, most of whom are dead and forgotten. If the Church of Reality excessively exalts current or historical figures it is on the wrong track. I am not, in many ways, a role model for human behavior. When I die I want my bad habits to die with me. I don't want to end up like Ayn Rand whose arrogance lives beyond the grave. May my arrogance be cremated with me.
Cruelty Free Religion - The Church of Reality rejects all forms of cruelty including torture, flagellation, stoning, slavery, human sacrifice, animal sacrifice, eternal damnation, and crucifixion. Our position is that these are the acts of barbarians and have no place in civilized society. Any religion who has to threaten its members with burning in Hell forever to entice them to believe is an admission that their beliefs can't stand up to Scrutiny. We are not a sin and punishment religion.
No Terrorism - We don't terrorize people to enforce our religious values. The following is a partial list of things we consider to be just plain evil. We are moved by our sense of moral justice to spell it out so as to take a strong stand against this kind of behavior.
Realists do not blow up airplanes or fly planes into buildings.
Realists do not blow up trains or subway stations.
Realists do not stone people to death.
Realists do not kill women for sex crimes.
Realists do not kill our daughters for refusing to wear the hijab.
Realists do not kill homosexuals.
Realists do not kill cartoonists who draw offensive cartoons.
Realists do not kill the families of those who offend us.
Realists do not kill people because they are a different race or tribe.
Realists do not kill women who were raped to restore the family's honor.
Realists do not kill women who refuse to marry them.
Realists do not allow husbands to beat their wives.
Realists do not do suicide bombings.
Realists do not blow up abortion clinics or kill doctors who perform abortions.
Realists do not throw acid in the faces of little girls on their way to school.
Realists do not cut off body parts or otherwise mutilate people.
Realists do not burn people alive.
Realists do not torture prisoners.
Realists do not crucify people.
Realists do not burn the homes or destroy the property of those who don't agree with us.
Realists do not poison people for political or religious gain.
Realists do not cut off the hands of thieves.
Realists do not perform honor killings.
Realists do not rape women to punish them and their families.
Realists do not punish women who have been raped.
Realists do not turn children into bombs.
Realists do not behead people.
Realists do not execute people by public hangings.
Realists do not enforce sexual morality through flogging.
Realists do not beat people.
Realists do not kidnap people.
Realists do not teach hatred.
Realists do not teach children to kill.
Realists do not teach that non-believers deserve death.
Realists do not teach the God will send you to burn in Hell to be tortured forever.
Realists do not believe that God is an omnipotent terrorist and torturer.
Realists do not kill people who Realists think offended a deity.
Realists do not believe in an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Realists do not believe in god(s). But if Realists did Realists would not believe in an angry vengeful god.
Realists do not commit genocide or ethnic cleansing.
Realists do not start religious wars.
Realists do not condone the accumulation or use of nuclear weapons.
Realists do not use weapons banned by the international community.
Realists believe terrorism is always wrong.
Realists believe torture is always wrong.
Realists believe cruelty is always wrong.
Realists believe that the deity portrayed in the Bible sets a bad role model for human behavior.
Realists refuse to participate in war crimes.
Our position is that our beliefs stand on their own merits and that belief systems that require terrorism to support their religious views are admitting through their conduct that their beliefs will not stand the tests of scrutiny. Terrorism is the tool of those who believe in a weak and false God. We believe that every time any person commits these kinds of acts that it forever becomes part of their Life Story, and it becomes part of the Story of Humanity. Our view is that once you do something it can not be undone. What Adolf Hitler did, for example, is forever part of human history and will forever remain a blemish on the soul of humanity itself. These acts are more than crimes against individuals. They reflect who we are as a species. That fact that you if did one of these acts is forever with you. After you die you will be remembered for the horrendous acts that you committed and your Life Story will be remembered with disdain.
No Absolution from Sin - Although we are a religion that sees forgiveness as a virtue, we do not absolve your sins. You have to work out forgiveness here in the real world. We provide no deity who will expunge your record. In the Church of Reality what you do becomes what you did and once you do something it becomes part of the Story of the Universe which is the sum total of everything that happened since the beginning of time. So if you do something evil, the fact that you did it is forever part of your Life Story.
In our world view absolution from sin encourages crime and irresponsibility by giving those who do wrong a false sense that some deity has forgiven them as if what they did never happened. In our view absolution is a form of cheating and you can't cheat reality. A person can change what they do in the future but what someone did in their past is forever part of who they are. Our view is that religion who offer absolution of sin through a deity are being irresponsible because they are creating a false illusion that people are forgiven who aren't. We think that it also contributes to higher crime rates and that if the individual knows that what they do is what they did, and there's no deity to help them cheat, then they might think before they commit a serious crime.
In other religions one can either confess to God or confess to a priest who is representing God for one's sins to be absolved and one's reward in the "next life" to be restored. The fostering of belief, for example, that the victim of murder might be in Heaven and that the murderer might get to go to Heaven too is an irresponsible religious act. Criminals might come to rely on such moral support to continue a life of crime. In the Church of Reality if you murder someone then they are forever gone and you are forever their murderer and that never changes. Some criminals can be rehabilitated and returned to society as productive citizens but what was done was done and can not be undone.
Original Virtue - The Church of Reality realizes that people are intrinsically good and that the Philosophy of the Open Hand is the natural character of the human race. Our world view is that people are intrinsically good people and that although there are people who do bad things that is the exception rather than the rule. We reject the assumption than humans are intrinsically evil.
No Religious Homeland - Realists do not believe that we or any other religion should have control of a country where some people have a superior social position based on religious or ethnic affiliation. Our world view is that justice and equality applies to everyone and that we are all part of an integrated human society. We believe that if a culture or religion has any special wisdom that they should share it with everyone else. We want to share our wisdom and learn the wisdom of other religions. Our view is that religious homelands lead to isolation, oppression, a false and dangerous sense of self importance, and eventually to war.
Commitment to Peace - The Church of Reality is a religion of peace. We have taken on the challenge of figuring out how to solve the problems that lead to war so that humanity can evolve beyond thousands of years of killing each other. Reality is best explored in an environment that is free from war. We embrace the Vocabulary of Peace and we take the position that we are an anti-war religion and we challenge other religions to identify as anti-war religions.
The Shame of War - Although we recognize that sometimes war might be necessary we think that it is never something to be proud of. War always represents a failure of peace and must never be glorified. We do not honor veterans merely for being in a war because if you glorify unjust wars then you encourage others to fight in unjust wars.
What the Church of Reality Isn't - Besides the above statements of what we are, much of what we are not defines us and not only a unique religion, but a completely different class of religion. Some people consider all religion to be evil because all religions tell you what to think or do other things that most all religions do that scares thinking people away. Some of the things the Church of Reality isn't includes:
We do not tell you what to think. You have to think for yourself. We are not interested in doing your thinking for you.
We do not worship anything.
We are not into rituals. No throwing virgins into volcanoes.
We don't burn witches.
We are not out to get your money.
We are not a cult.
We are not the only path.
We are not any better than anyone else.
We are not on a higher plane of consciousness.
We are not enlightened.
We are not into dogma.
We are not sinners.
We do not demonize sex.
We do not require you to get married before having sex.
We do not demonize thinking, science, or reason.
We do not hate ourselves.
We do not hate homosexuals.
We do not have commandments.
We are free of gods, devils, demons, spirits, fairies, elves, vampires, angels, leprechauns, trolls, pixies, thetans, prophets, ghosts, goblins, witches, and space alien possession or abduction. (Some of us however secretly believe Spock is real.)
We do not demonize nonmembers.
We are not the chosen people.
We do not restrict your personal freedoms.
We do not indulge in an inflated sense of self importance.
We are not endorsed by any omnipotent beings.
We do not accept real estate from deities.
We do not ask you to turn your life over to anyone.
We do not kill you for converting away from Realism.
We do not kill people over cartoons.
We do not shun you for leaving this church.
We do not ask you to put aside logic and reason.
We do not require you to accept anything on faith.
We do not save your soul by asking you to have a personal experience with a fictional deity.
We do not pass out preacher credentials, participate in religious fraud, nor are we involved in or advocate tax scams.
We do not make false promises or threats about in relation to a fictional next life. No Heaven, Hell, Purgatory, or Reincarnation.
We do not offer you virgins as a reward for terrorism.
We do not make you wear weird clothing.
We do not distort the meaning of words to make them meaningless.
War is not Peace
Freedom is not Slavery
Ignorance is not Strength
Submission is not Freedom
Death is not Life
Suffering is not Pleasure
Reality is not Illusion
Reality is not Personal Perception
Faith is not Truth
You don't obtain freedom by giving it up
Common Sense is not the opposite of being Smart
Converting to Realism - Converting to Realism starts with experiencing the AH-HA Moment. That's the moment when you really get it. When something inside you says, "YES! I get it! Reality as it really is! Of course! It's so obvious! It all makes sense!". That's when you Accept the Truth and make a commitment to put Reality First in your life.
So - if these sort of things scare you about religion, that is understandable. It scares us too. That's why we choose to be different and offer a new model of religion, designed from scratch, but without most of the flaws of traditional religions. If you like what you see then read Getting Started as a Realist next.
What is different about us that distinguishes us from other life forms on this planet? Is it our opposable thumbs? Is it that we walk upright? Our intelligence? Our soul? Genetically, we are very similar to all the other animals, yet we clearly rule the world. What is it that makes us different? What makes us different is that we have a Tree of Knowledge.
The Tree of Knowledge is the sum total of Human Understanding. It represents the collective knowledge of humanity.
The Tree of Knowledge is the sum total of all human knowledge that can be passed on between individuals. It is everything we have learned as a species. In the broadest sense - it's the totality of everything that everyone knows that is in some sharable form. Printed material - data archives - video - recordings - stories passed on by word of mouth. These all are knowledge that is contained in the Tree of Knowledge. And it is this shared knowledge that is what separates us from the animals. We are different because of the vast amount of knowledge that we as a species share.
The human race can be viewed as a super organism that is made up of individuals. In many ways we are similar to a hive of bees. Bees are far more biologically linked together than humans in that a bee is nothing when taken out of the context of the hive. Just as the cells of our body are individual life forms, we don't look at them as individuals. In the case of humans - and bees - the individual is the human or bee.
What separates humans from animals is our huge amount of collected knowledge that we share as a species.
However - in the case of bees - they are so tightly coupled that one could easily make the argument that it is the hive - not the bee - that is the individual. The hive shares a common mind that the individual bees are but members of the hive mind. These individuals share a common purpose and act as a single organism. And to that extent - it is the hive - not the bee - that acts. Getting stung by a bee is very different that being stung by the hive.
We humans have some hive-like properties. If you take a baby and have a wild animal raise it - is the result more animal than human? I think it is. The individual would only have the knowledge of personal experience. It would not have the knowledge that is available to humans raised by other humans. The vast majority of our personal knowledge is not knowledge we learned on our own - but knowledge we were taught from the collective knowledge of mankind. And it's that collective knowledge that I'm calling the "Tree of Knowledge".
The Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality define the basic belief system and create a moral and ethical framework for the church and they create and protect the kind of environment needed to be Realists and practice Realism. When we Realists ask the Sacred Moral Question - Is this a good thing? - these are the principles against which we test morality. The Sacred Principles are based on the Sacred Choices where we as a religion declare that certain things have value. These things include the survival of the human race, that we should move in the Sacred Direction towards a better future, and that understanding reality is a good thing. The Sacred Principles lay out some of the framework to define our rights and responsibilities, and create a framework for the existence and goals of our church. The Sacred Principles help form the basis for determining what is right from what is wrong in the absence of an omnipotent creator. These principles help define the dharma of the church and give meaning for it's existence.
The Church of Reality is a religion dedicated to believing in everything that is real. It is the pursuit of the understanding of understanding. Since on this planet understanding is limited for the most part to humans as the beings that understand, it supports the goals of the Church to support that which enhances the Tree of Knowledge and oppose things that would inhibit or prohibit the pursuit of understanding reality the way it really is. As a church we are interested not only in the expansion of the Tree of Knowledge itself, but also in the means by which knowledge is expanded.
The pursuit of the understanding of understanding is not enough if people lack the means to do so. We therefore have the goal of liberating new ideas from oppression, providing the means to communicate and preserve ideas, and to find a balance between protecting the intellectual property of the individual as well as protecting the intellectual commons. As a church we support education, scientific research, debate, the development of technology, the development of social systems, and the protection of justice. We strive for a free and peaceful planet where mankind can flourish and explore the reality of our own existence. We strive to become better and to evolve in a positive direction. The Church of Reality is a forward looking church dedicated to the idea that tomorrow should be better than today and that it is our dharma to ensure that the world does not end in destruction as many other religions believe.
In order to fulfill these objectives we have created the order of the /root. These are the monks of the Church of Reality who have dedicated their lives to doing tech support for the human race so that all people, whether or not they choose to pursue reality, will always have the opportunity to do so. The name /root is a term that comes from the Linux/Unix operating system and is the super user account that has the power and responsibility to keep the system running. In the Church of Reality to be /root is to accept the power and responsibility to keep the systems of society running.
The Sacred Principles are not like the Ten Commandments in that there is no claim that God or any other deity commanded them. There is no promise of a gift of eternal life in Heaven nor is there a threat of Burning in Hell forever. They are not a measure for which sins are counted nor Karma assessed nor are you accumulating brownie points for life after death. These principles are not static principles nor do they represent a complete list of what is or what should be. They are, in part, a beginning attempt to create a basis of determining right from wrong and to create and define a positive direction for the human race to make progress.
Some of the Sacred Principles use our Sacred Terminology. The reader will better understand the principles by reading the Terminology first.
In the cold darkness of outer space reality is just stars exploding and rocks bumping into each other. This planet is but an insignificant spec of dust in the universe. This is science and this is reality. The Church of Reality however is more than just believing that reality is real, it is a choice to explore reality and everything associated with exploring reality.
In galactic terms, it doesn't matter if humanity thrives or destroys itself. If we were gone tomorrow, who would care? It only matters to us. Thus - the Church of Reality is more than a study of reality. It is about the relationship between humanity and reality. Or specifically, humanity's exploration of reality.
We Realists commit our lives to Realism by making The Sacred Choices
It is a fact that we as humans are all part of the greater society and that we function collectively. It is true that our success as a species is based on our Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of all human understanding. It is true that in order to pursue reality we have to do it cooperatively and that in this pursuit, we are all in this together. Yet there is nothing that compels us to make good choices, to decide to evolve in a positive direction, and to pursue the truth instead of a shared fantasy. It is by choice that we decide our fate, who we will become together as a species. This is our planet. We are all here together. And we are going to work together to make tomorrow better than today. That is why we of the Church of Reality make the Sacred Choices and hereby dedicate our lives to the Sacred Missions and begin the Sacred Journey.
We choose to accept the Sacred Missions as our mission.
We choose to uphold the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality making them our principles.
We choose to pursue the understanding of reality the way it really is.
We choose to reject mythology and the belief in things that are not real.
We choose to accept the path of responsibility and acknowledge that our choices matter.
We choose to strive for wisdom and to live our lives as realistically as possible.
We choose to commit to challenging our beliefs and the beliefs of others by asking the Sacred Question - "Is this real?"
We choose to acknowledge that the Tree of Knowledge is the sum total of all human understanding.
We choose to commit to working to improve the Tree of Knowledge by working for a better future.
We choose to be forward looking and work for a better future for the human race.
We choose to be good ethical members of society and contribute our efforts to the well being of the human race.
The Linux Penguin symbolizes the Giving of Knowledge
The Tree of Knowledge represents the sum total of human understanding. Intellectual Tithing is the giving of new and useful information to the Tree of Knowledge. The Tree of Knowledge is what separates us from the animals. We all benefit from the knowledge that has been handed down to us.
Think about it - where would we be today if someone didn't invent the wheel? The person who invented the wheel made a great contribution to the Tree of Knowledge of the human race and helped all of society move forward. If you look around at all the stuff around you - you soon realize that almost all of it was built by other people. As you sit in front of your computer reading this, you are using a device that is the combined work of millions of people and technology that is built on the work of people for thousands of years. All contributing to the Tree of Knowledge which allows us to have things like computers. We are living off the intellectual tithing of others, and we give back to the world by contributing intellectually - by being creative and sharing our creations with the rest of humanity. This helps grow the Tree of Knowledge and furthers us as a species. From this perspective - the human race can be envisioned as a single super being that shares a common mind. And in that respect we all have the opportunity to contribute to that common mind so that our thoughts and contributions will outlive our physical bodies. Contributing to the Tree of Knowledge is probably as close as you get to immortality in the Church of Reality.
Intellectual Tithing is discovering something useful and making your knowledge part of the Tree of Knowledge.
I use the Linux Penguin as a symbol of intellectual tithing because the Linux operating system is distributed under the GNU license and is free to everyone. This software is the work of tens of thousands of people contributing freely to a software tree that everyone on the planet is allowed to use. These people freely give of their intellectual resources to the good of humanity. As you surf the Internet you are hitting servers that are running this free software.
The Church or Reality exists for the pursuit of the understanding of understanding. We exist to pursue the answer to the Sacred Question - "What is Real?" This church isn't about what you believe in - it's about what you do. To be a member of this church is to commit to the doing of the doing. You have to walk the walk and talk the talk. The Church of Reality is about being real - not pretending to be real because reality looks cool. It's not about being a poser and fake being real. The dharma of the church is to actually be real.
Although we don't go from door to door asking people if they know Darwin and saying Darwin loves you, one of the sacred missions of the Church of Reality is to spread the idea that reality is important and that it is something that shouldn't be ignored. As Realists practicing Realism we benefit in growing our church by attracting others who may not be church members, but have embraced the concept of being realistic and are interested in what is real. It is one of our goals to raise awareness about reality and the importance of including reality in our daily lives and to make people aware of the pitfalls of ignoring reality.
So - how do we do this? There are many ways, but there are a few obvious places to start. As the First One I will start the process and list some specific objectives of the Church of Reality. The list will grow - but it will form an outline for the kind of thinking that defines the dharma of the church.
Some of the Sacred Principles use our Sacred Terminology. The reader will better understand the principles by reading the Terminology first.
The Church of Reality began with an idea I had in the evening of November 7th 1998. I was sitting at home Smoking a Joint, thinking about all the problems that religions cause in the world, and the idea just hit me - why not have a religion based on believing in everything that's real? What an idea! Can Reality be a Religion? Do you have to believe in something fictional to be a religion? The more I thought about it - the better I liked the idea.
The next day I went into the office and it still seemed like a good idea. I was only half serious about it at first, but it was at least a good way to tweak all those people who think they have God by the short hairs and need to impress me with their moral superiority. Personally - I hate religion. But it seems to be everywhere and constantly trying to intrude into my life. So - it's always been something you have to deal with - people who take their fiction seriously. So I registered the domain name - churchofreality.org - and started building a web page.
In the process of building the page I had to make some early decisions. Was I going to write some "holy book" to go by? How long would that last before it became obsolete - even if I did do a good job on it? It became apparent that telling people what reality is - as if I knew - was definitely a mistake. But - exploring reality and changing as the exploration continued - that made sense. So what we believe in is what's real - and what's real is really the best effort guess at the time. Obviously this opens us up to mistakes - but mistakes happen. It's about correcting your mistakes when you realize you are wrong. So the Church of Reality became more of a commitment to the pursuit of reality than the understanding of reality itself. It's about the hunt for reality.
As I was thinking about the pursuit of reality - I started wondering about how that is really done. What is understanding? How does new knowledge relate to existing knowledge? How much knowledge can be gained? Will we ever know everything? It became clear to me that the pursuit of knowledge - the exploration of reality - is something that we as a society all do together. It became clear how interconnected we are as a society - as the human race - what separates us from the animals - we have this vast amount of common knowledge that we all use on a daily basis. I realized that language itself - words - were all invented by other people and were handed down to us. As I type this I am aware that I am using words and concepts that came from other people - and that you are reading this using those same words and concepts. Stealing the term for other religions - I called this the .
Is there a God? How do we determine if God exists or not? First - let me define God so that we are all talking about the same being. The God I'm talking about is:
The omnipotent being who is all powerful and created the universe.
God is invisible - but he is everywhere - and he knows everything - even our thoughts.
God hasn't showed up in physical form - out in public for at least 2000 years - longer if you are Jewish - 150 years if you are Mormon.
God could show up any where at any time in any form if he wanted to, but he doesn't.
God is infinitely wise.
God knows the future and everything is going according to God's plan.
So - are we talking about the same God? Are we on the same page on this? If so - what conclusions can we draw?
Well - we know that God can come out - but he doesn't That means he chooses not to. He could write a new updated Bible - maybe even publish it on the web - but he doesn't - and he chooses not to.
God could come out in public - but he doesn't. Therefore he chooses not to.
People claim to have a personal relationship with God, and that God reveals himself individually to people who open up to him. But I have observed that those who seem to truly believe they have a personal relationship with God are getting very different messages. Some are getting a peace and love message while others are being called to arms to fight a holy war against other people who believe God is on their side supporting their cause. I therefore have to believe that some of these people if not all of them just think God is talking to them when he really isn't.
God apparently doesn't reveal himself to realists like me. God could reveal himself to me - but he chooses not to. And even if he did reveal himself to me personally - that doesn't qualify him as real to the Church of Reality. I am after all just a guy with an idea. I do not control reality. God doesn't become real based on the belief of Marc Perkel. In order to qualify as real to the church of Reality - God have to come out in an objective form that everyone can observe in the real world.
There is a possibility that God exists and that he is deliberately concealing himself for us faithless Realists and that it is his will that people like me never find him. If that is the case - then it is the will of God that realists like myself don't believe in him and that God is in control and that we Realists are doing exactly what we are supposed to do under God's plan.
The standard for reality in the Church of Reality is that for us to declare something is (probably) real - it has to be something that is objectively observable in the real world by any observer. Personal revelation does not meet this test. So - even if I were to personally believe in God - that isn't good enough for the Church of Reality. We are committed to believing in reality the way it really is.
The official position of the Church of Reality is that God does not exist until such time as God chooses to reveal himself to all Realists and come out into objective reality in the real world.
It is therefore the official position of the Church of Reality that God does not exist until such time as God chooses to reveal himself to all Realists and comes out into objective reality in the real world. Should God come out into the real world then we as Realists will instantly become theists and will do whatever God commands us to do. Until that happen then either God does not exist or it is God's will that Realists don't believe in him. Either way - this is the correct choice. Except for the burning in Hell forever part - but I suppose that too is God's will because if he exists he must be in control and this is his plan.
It's not up to the Church of Reality to prove God doesn't exist. It is up to theists to prove he does.
I will state right now that if I ever become a theist without an objective real world test proving the existence of God - then I have lost my mind and I am no longer qualified to hold a leadership position in the Church of Reality. I do not have the authority to declare God exists unless God can be objectively perceived by all members of the Church of Reality.
Although war cannot always be avoided - there is no honor or victory in war. We believe war always represents the failure to achieve peace and it is always something to be ashamed of. War is to be remembered from the perspective of failure and as a lesson to learn to avoid war in the future. We in the Church or Reality understand - especially in this day of nuclear and biological weapons - that peace is not something that is optional, and that we have a responsibility to our fellow human beings to do whatever it takes to avoid war.
Sometimes going to war is the right thing to do. There are times due to the mistakes of others that going to war becomes necessary. However, it is more often the case that war is not necessary and is in fact counterproductive to the effort towards peace. And if going to war is necessary there is a code of moral conduct that Realists should follow in the execution of the war. This document is here for the purpose of giving instructions and guidance for those of you who are being pulled into battle. Realists do not behave like other soldiers. As a realist you are required to set a higher standard and to actively adhere to this higher standard even if it puts you at personal risk.
The first duty of Realists is to uphold the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality.
The first duty of Realists is to uphold the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality. This duty takes precedent over loyalty to your country, your military unit, your commanding officer. If the cause of war is just, you are at best a team member fighting together with non-realists towards a common higher goal. To this end Realists should set a shining example and strive for positions of leadership in the military unit in which they are fighting. A Realist who practices Realism should be in a position to realistically assess the situation and to be able to help make the realistic choices in how to best execute the war and to build the peace after the war.
If the cause is a just cause, then the Realist would be the ultimate war asset in order to maintain intellectual discipline to make the right decision and positively affect the outcome of the struggle. The Realist should set an example of personal behavior and inspire his fellow soldiers to be smart and wise and to fight efficiently and effectively and to not degenerate into committing atrocities. The Realists sees into the future and envisions the end of the war and to building of the peace and to integrating the enemy into the world's society as a productive peaceful member.
The Church of Reality doesn't prohibit its members from going to fight in a war. It does however prohibit its members from fighting in an unjust war - and it requires its members to make a personal determination if the war they are about to participate in is just or not. Members who do participate are required to adhere to a code of moral conduct that puts the Sacred Principles ahead of everything else and are required to refuse to participate in anything that is clearly immoral and to actively resists orders of superior officers who would lead troops down the wrong path. Realists are expected to think for themselves and to make wise choices in times of war.
Different religions have different positions on death and dying, and in cases where there is a legal dispute, often the courts will turn to the person's individual religious beliefs to determine the wishes of people who are unable to speak for themselves. So it seems logical that the Church of Reality should have some official guidelines so that if the outside world turns to the individual's religious beliefs we have a response.
When does death occur? Who gets to decide? When do you remove a person from life support? When do you assist a person in terminating life? What are the roles of individuals, their spouses, their children, their family, their church, and the government? The Church of Reality cannot answer these questions, but we can create guidelines and principles to come up with these answers and that is what we choose to do here.
Issues surrounding death and dying can become complex, especially in a society that is in denial. Sometimes people are trapped in a permanent vegetative state. Sometimes they are still alive and facing a horrible death. Sometimes they are clearly alive but face an uphill battle that they don't want to go through. Science and technology offer new choices, and, because of that, often complicate the situation allowing the body to remain alive long after death would naturally occur. Therefore it is difficult to create hard and fast rules for dying. We therefore will state general principles from which rules can be derived.
We have applied for our 501(c)(3) status as of December of 2003. On October 19th 2005 we were told by the IRS that we have been approved.
If, however, you don't have money, there are a lot of other things you can do to help that don't cost anything. You can tell your friends, and you can link to us. Linking to us is important because it gets us a higher ranking in Google.
Terms and Conditions When donating money to the Church of Reality you are giving money to us without any expectation of receiving anything in return. "Church of Reality" and "Reality" are trademarks of the Church of Reality.
Your credit card and personal information are not stored by the church of Reality. In fact our servers never see that data. So no one can break into us and steal this information because we don't have it.
Content submitted by site users
If you do post content to this site or otherwise submit material (including, but not limited to, photographs and testimonials), you grant Church of Reality and its affiliates a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, and display such content throughout the world in any media. By your submission you represent and warrant that you own or otherwise control all of the rights to the content that you post; that the content is accurate; that use of the content you supply does not violate this policy and will not cause injury to any person or entity; and that you will indemnify Church of Reality or its affiliates for all claims resulting from content you supply. Church of Reality reserves the right to remove any content at our sole discretion.
To become a saint in the Church of Reality you have to put yourself in a position of grave personal risk in order to promote an idea that is real in the face of a public that refuses to face reality. People who do this are heroes and are the visionaries that move humanity forward against the tide of fear and religious mythology. These people deserve an honored place in the memory of human history and I therefore am going to declare them as saints.
Sainthood in this church is based more on advancing the cause of reality rather the just doing good things. Thus a saint in this church might be someone who contributed significantly to science or protecting rights necessary for the pursuit of Reality rather than those who are without sins. People who have done great things deserve to be recognized, but there are plenty of other churches to recognize other achievements.
I'm not a religious guy and never started a church before. I'm not
even entirely comfortable with the thought of being a church because
that implies worshiping something. I'm looking at this as a way to get
more people to want to look at reality the way it really is. I'm
getting tired of being the only sane person on the planet. (I'm joking)
Here's a list of what needs to be done. This is a changing list. As
I accomplish things I'll remove items. As I get new ideas I'll add
items. I'd like to get this going fairly quickly.
Spread the Word - The name is the message. If most of the
people in the world were just to hear the name "Church of Reality" and
have a vague idea that it is a religion based on believing in what's
real, they then ask the sacred question, "What is real?", that in itself
would make a huge difference in the world.
Link to Us - The more people link to the Church of Reality
the more people find it. It also helps with Google searches because
Google ranks you higher based on the number of people that link to your
site.
Ideas - I'm always looking for great ideas and suggestions,
especially early on. If you do something right in the first place you
don't have to do it over later. Feel free to suggest and participate.
IRS Church Status - I've started the paperwork. I've ordered several books from Nolo Press an not-for-profit organization. Any advice would be appreciated.
Income - If I'm going to continue to do this, I need an income. Besides begging for donations,
I need some products to sell like T-Shirts, buttons, bumper stickers,
and sequentially numbered certificates of membership. Looking for
ideas.
Activities - I want to see local activities on a regular
basis. I'm picturing meetings where people get together to argue and
explore interesting subjects much like Mensa, but without the IQ test
requirement. I need names for these meetings and ideas to bring people
together and fulfill much of the needs that people go to church for.
Let's get together. This church has no Sabbath so we have the advantage
of using any day of the week that works.
Charities - I want to be a conduit of tax deductible money for useful charitable projects. Just what, I don't yet know.
Projects - I feel strongly about freedom and justice. We
need freedom and justice to support an advanced society where the
pursuit of reality can be enjoyed without fear and oppression. One of
the church's missions is to work for freedom and justice.
Membership - What are the requirements? I suppose it should
be fairly open to those who pay a membership fee. I hope to sell
sequentially numbered membership certificates so that those with a low
number will always be stored in a computer database and will be known
as the ones who got it started. It's like being an employee at
Microsoft with a really low employee number.
Advertising, Promotion, Public Relations - How do we market
it? Spread the word? Relate to the rest of reality? I don't want
foaming at the mouth Christians burning my house down because they
think they can stop the real world by killing the messenger. I'm
looking for media attention so if anyone knows anyone who will write
articles about this religion, send them this way.
Symbols and Artwork - I'm looking for symbols and artwork
for the web pages, letterhead, and things to put on T-Shirts, coffee
mugs, and bumper stickers.
Hymns - Need some songs. How about, "Oh, what a friend we have in Darrr-winnn."
I'd like to get started right away. Feel free to jump in and participate.
There are a lot of good questions about the Church of Reality. Here are some of the more common ones. Hopefully you will find the answers here. Our Principle of Scrutiny and Doubt encourages people to question everything. We like questions because they help us to evolve forward to make sure we get it right. Any time someone is questioning us they are thinking about reality, which is one of our missions. We want you to not only understand what we are about, but to join us in improving our doctrine. If this doesn't answer your questions you can join our Discussion Forum and hopefully a real person will answer your question.
The Church of Reality is a religion, not a political organization. As a religion we do not endorse candidates or take any partisan political positions. We are not involved in party politics. We strongly believe in the separation of church and state and that separation applies to us as well, even though we believe as strongly as every other religion does that we are right. The scope of the Church of Reality as an institution is to focus on the religion of reality.
This is not an endorsement of these religions. We are merely attempting to create links to the main web sites of people who believe in something other than reality. That way you can choose if you think you'd rather
believe in what's real or something else.
Cigarette smoking is not prohibited in the Church of Reality but is highly discouraged as it is a really bad idea. Cigarettes and tobacco - especially as processed by the tobacco industry, are the most highly addictive drugs on the planet and becoming a drug addict reflects bad judgment. Bad judgement is something to be avoided because a realist generally becomes a realists because they have dedicated their life to good judgment.
Of course, many people are already addicted to cigarettes before they become a realist and can't quit. I wish everyone the best of luck who is trying to quit and encourage realists to help develop technology to help cure drug addiction, because a cigarette smoker is a drug addict and drug addiction is a bad choice.
Smoking in restaurants however is a sin as well as smoking inside where other people who are non-smokers have to breath it.
For those of you who are thinking about smoking, I wrote a web page called A message to Teenagers about Smoking that I hope you will read before you consider smoking cigarettes.
Sex is moral in the Church of Reality. Sex is how we humans reproduce. We are the descendents of 3 billion years of sexual intercourse. Sex is something that is normal and natural and it not sin nor anything to be ashamed of. If not for sex - I wouldn't be writing this and you wouldn't be reading it.
Like the animals, we humans have sexual instincts that we can at best partially control. We have some control over it but only limited control. After all - there have been people in history who have risen above their instinctual urges - but they are not our ancestors. We are the descendents of those without self-control, and when it comes down to it, the majority of people born on this planet are not planned.
The Church of Reality takes the position, like every other issue, that reality be applied to sex. And the reality is - sex is an evolved desire that drives us to reproduce. That's why the instinct to do it is so strong. However the instinct to reproduce must be balanced with good judgment and issues with the transmission of disease. Fortunately we have evolved the technology of birth control and condoms that allow us to enjoy the instincts without spreading disease and not creating more people that we aren't prepared to raise. Sexual issues are very complex and we take the position that sexual education and research are necessary in order to best deal with issues of a sexual nature.
Our Sacred Principles
are much more sophisticated than the old Ten Commandments were. I
suppose that 5000 years ago, or whenever they were written, that the
concpt of "Thou shalt not Kill" was a radically new idea. In fact the
Muslim world in particular still hasn't grasped the concept. Our Sacred
Principles are more forward looking, and they are subject to evolving
into something better as people evolve forward. They are not "carved in
stone" so to speak like the Ten Commandments were.
Having said that, the Church of Reality does recognize that the
commandments do exist, so let us take a look at each one of them and see
where we stand on them. Like Christian religions, I will pick and choose
which version of the 10 Commandments we are talking about. I choose the
Catholic version because they are shorter.
The Bible
Church of Reality
1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
No - God doesn't exist
2. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
No - Fictional Deity and prohibits free expression.
3. Remember thou keep the Sabbath Day.
No - It is based on the fictional idea the world was created in 6 days.
4. Honor thy Father and thy Mother.
No - Honoring parents is generally a good thing, but it depends on family relationships. Suggested but not required.
5. Thou shalt not kill.
Yes - Generally, murder is a bad thing.
6. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
No - We do encourage honesty in relationships. Some
people choose to have an open marriage. Adultry is not prohibited.
7. Thou shalt not steal.
Yes - Generally, Stealing is wrong.
8. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
Yes - Generally lying is wrong.
9. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife.
No - Isn't this really the same as #6?
10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's goods.
Yes - Isn't this really the same as #7?
Even though 10 commandments are listed, the last 2 are really duplicates of 6 and 7. So there are really only 8 commandments. The Church of Reality agrees with 3 and disagrees with 5. If these were written by God, he didn't do a very good job of it.
Furthermore, the Church of Reality is strongly opposed to the first 3 of the 10 commandments in that they require the belief in a fictional deity that clearly does not exist. We consider the required belief in fiction to be religious oppression, and we find these first 3 commandments to be morally offensive. Of the 3 commandments that we agree with, killing, stealing, and lying, those are principles that are somewhat obvious under Humanism and natural law.
The Church of Reality is a registered trademark owned by the First One, Marc Perkel, in trust for the Church of Reality. In granting this trademark we have to specifically disclaim that the word "Church" by itself is our trademark. As I understand trademarks, the mark protects the exact phrase and anything close enough to be essentially the same thing. This often includes sub phrases of the original phrase trademarked. So the copyright office preemptively prohibited us from claiming that "Church" is our trademark.
But - they didn't preclude me from claiming "Reality" by itself as our trademark. And therefore I do claim it. This serves notice to all who see this that in the context of the classification for which this trade mark was granted - the classification 045 "Counseling in religious and spiritual matters" that "Reality" is also ours. We own reality in the context of religion. Thus any other religious institution, for example, who used Reality as part of their name would be infringing on our trademark.
Trademarks are used in business and other organizations to create an identity in the minds of consumers. In the case of churches, consumers are potential members. Religion is a marketplace where religious institutions compete for the souls out there who are looking for a religious identity and these religions market themselves to the public based on that religious identity. For example, if I were to pretend to be a Catholic church the real Catholic church would sue me for trademark infringement. The word Catholic is their marketing word. If I use that word or something so similar that it confuses people into believing that I am the Catholic Church - that would be trademark infringement.
Reality is our trademark in the context of religion. Reality is not just what we believe in - it's our marketing word. In fact - it's our Sacred Message. And it is one of our Sacred Missions to spread the Sacred Message. But we can't do that if someone else hijacks our trademark and uses it, for example, to promote a competitive religious belief as reality when it is in fact not. We are the religion of reality and no one else can market themselves as a religion and use Reality to promote themselves.
What is the future of humanity? What will the human race be like 10 years from now? Or 20 years from now? Or 100 years from now? Or 1000 years from now? Where are we heading in the future? And, more importantly, what can we do about it?
Looking towards the future in the Church of Reality is looking in the Sacred Direction. This church is all about where we are going and taking control of our own evolution. We believe in taking responsibility for our future by being realists and using reality to guide us in making important choices so that we can ensure that we grow the Tree of Knowledge and that tomorrow is better than today. We realists commit ourselves to the Principle of Positive Evolution and in order to fulfil that commitment, it is our responsibility (The Sacred Responsibility) to look forward at the possibilities and to think things through so that we don't make mistakes that will put us on the Path of Destitution and Destruction. It is up to us to deny Armageddon to the Christians.
Our job as Realists is to make sure that the Christians are denied Armageddon."
The role of the Church of Reality is to ask The Sacred Moral Question - what is good? What is right and wrong in the context of reality. Asking the Sacred Moral Question means more than just asking a question. It really mean to insist that The Sacred Moral Question be answered in the context of what is real and that the moral element be evaluated in terms of The Sacred Principles.
This section is a discussion of some of the issues facing the human race in the near future. Some of the opinions expressed here are the opinions of The First One and are not a declaration of reality. I do not claim to have the power to see the future. The idea here is to introduce ideas in order to create discussion about them and focus our attention in the Sacred Direction. Allow your imagination to be stimulated by what you read here and if you don't agree - that's fine. As long as you are thinking about it.
Most of the holidays of the Church of Reality fall on the same days as other religions. Most religions rip off the holidays of other religions, and our religion is no exception. These are days when everyone already has off from work and that people are used to celebrating anyway. It is the tradition of religions to maintain consistency in these celebrations, and we in the Church of Reality are going to go along with these traditions. Like other religions, we will of course adapt the meaning of these holidays to suit our belief system.
Holiday celebrations, of course, are up to the individual, and you are free to celebrate anything you want. In our church, holidays are for fun and education and exist mostly for social reasons: to let people get together, visit family, eat big meals together, and form community. They create an opportunity for people to came together to discuss the Sacred Questions and to Wonder the Sacred Wonderment. We are thankful for the knowledge that was handed down to us, and we think about what we can contribute to the Tree of Knowledge for the next generation.
Technically the Church of Reality isn't an Atheist religion, but it comes very close, and it's not totally incorrect to classify the Church as an Atheist religion. Our official position is that if God shows up, and that means exising in objective reality, then we will believe in it. However, there exists no hard evidence that God exists, and if it does exist, it chooses to remain hidden from objective tests. So one can say with accuracy that the Church of Reality is presently an Atheistic religion. And there isn't a lot of anticipation that is likely to change any time soon.
Having said that, many people have asked what the difference is between the Church of Reality and Atheists. The Church of Reality is a religion. Atheism is not a religion. Atheism is not much more than a statement that one does not believe in God. Atheism is about what you don't believe in. Realism in contrast is about what you do believe in. Atheism is essentially a very small subset of the Church of Reality's positions.
Atheists realize that Atheism by itself is lacking in that once you don't believe in God, what do you do next? How do we live? What is right and wrong? Many Atheists embrace Secular Humanism as a companion lifestyle.
Sometimes people ask, "Isn't the Church of Reality just Humanism?" No - but there is a lot of overlap between Secular Humanism and the Church of Reality.
Humanism - as I understand it is a search for a natural social order without an omnipotent father figure creating the rules. If we were to create what we conceive as a healthy society, on what basis do we determine if we are on track?
The Church of Reality is about the exploration of reality the way it really is. In order to do that, we need to explore it as a community. We rely on the information passed down to us through the Tree of Knowledge, which is the some total of all human understanding. We explore reality by growing the Tree. In order to do that, society has to move forward in what we call, "The Sacred Direction" based on the Principle of Positive Evolution which states that we choose that we will make tomorrow better than today. Out of this we derive the Sacred Principles, which form the basis of our moral code.
When you look at the Sacred Principles, The Sacred Choices, and the Sacred Missions of the Church of Reality you will see that they create a basis for a society that would lead to Secular Humanism. The practice of Realism is the foundation that creates the reason why for Humanism to exist.
Why is freedom preferable to slavery? Does right and wrong exist? After all - this planet is just a speck of dust in the universe and reality itself doesn't care what happens. It is because we choose to explore reality and that our progression is important to us that we have arbitrarily chosen to move to progress and to avoid extinction. We have chosen evolution over extinction. Other religions have made the opposite choice.
We see Humanism as the natural lifestyle that would be the logical extension of the Sacred Principles put into practice in society. In that regard Humanism and the Church of Reality overlap. But Humanism is not a religion and is limited in scope to a natural social order based on reality.
Although most Atheists are Humanists, not all Humanists are Atheists. Humanism doesn't exclude religion per se. It does however tend to exclude religion and/or holy texts as the basis for social structure. Many religions, including this one, have many of the same social principles. They come to the same conclusions in part because they have enbraced reality as the common element. And we in the Church of Reality support reality based thinking.
For what it's worth - if you are going to email us intending to convert us, you're wasting your time. Messages of this type are usually deleted without being read. Similarly, if you are writing to inform us how you will be in Heaven and we will be in Hell, we've already heard that and we are familiar with your belief system. If you write something really offensive we might just publish it as an example of what kinds of email we get from nut cases.
Feel free to contact us with ideas and suggestions.
Lets face it - Realists don't trust Christians and Christians don't like Realists. But we do need to communicate in spite of our differences. After all - we are stuck here on this planet together. And - Christians have been around for a long time and they aren't going away any time soon. And - neither is reality. So - we are stuck here together and the way I see it - we better make the best of it. After all - our religion requires it of us since we are all one people on one planet - we are all here together - and we are dedicated to making tomorrow better than it is today. That's our principle of positive evolution, the first of the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality.
There is a lot of discussion about the relationship between Realists and Christians. We don't trust each other. I did after all write a web page titled Christianity Sucks, and I wouldn't be honest if I didn't admit that I think what I said is true. After all - to a Realist Christianity looks like a primitive religious cult. No different really that the way some Christian look at each other. Jehovah's Witnesses think they are the "True Christians" and therefore need to convert other Christians to their form of Christianity. Those who are not Jehovah's Witnesses think that the Jehovah's Witnesses are seriously off track and believe that they are in fact - a cult.
In fact - and be honest about this - most Christians can name at least 5 other Christian Religions that are cults - and if you know what I'm talking about then you will understand that Realists feel that way towards all Christians. As far as I am concerned - every last one of you is a "True Christian". But what Christianity truly means is very different depending on who you ask. If I were to compare Christianity to an animal species - Wolves are "True Dogs". They are the dogs from which every other breed of dog comes from. But look at the variety. From the outside perspective Christianity is as diverse as breeds of dogs are. After all these centuries - who is to say who are true dogs anymore? After all - even the wolves aren't the same as they used to be.
So - what does Christianity look like from the outside? Did you ever wonder that? Wonder what Realists were really thinking? Well - I see a lot of diversity - not just in belief - but more importantly - Christian culture is highly inconsistent between religions and is also fast evolving. When it comes right down to it - the Bible says anything you want it to say - and there's no level of behavior that's outside of Biblical support. And that scares us.
After all - Christian History is not a pretty picture. There has not been any significant period of time since Jesus departed where Christians weren't at war with someone - many times other Christians - or brutally oppressing someone. And - that is a trend that has continues up to and including today. The Iraq war - for example - clearly has deep religious undercurrents to it. It is clearly in part - a battle between Muslims and the Christian-Jewish alliance..Our President - Mr. Bush - identifies himself as a Christian and he is running the country into the ground. This is a man who had a memo drafted to approve torture, and as a result of that memo we have widespread torture - committed by us - and done in a way to make us look like barbarians.
Now there are several Christian groups who have announced that they have seized control of America - and they are going to use the rule of law to enforce their "moral" standards - a huge rollback of freedom - and replace the science of evolution with the fiction of Creationism. And all children will be taught their prayers in school. And if the Christians are in control of the nuclear arsenal - and the country is in a nose dive - and these people envision the future in terms of Armageddon - the destruction of the world - that scares the shit out of us Realists. Especially when your Christian president was advocating the idea of using nuclear weapons in Iraq during the initial invasion - and it turns out - Iraq had no weapons. Yet is it believed that Bush is somehow being controlled by or inspired by God. That it was God's idea to attack Iraq.
As a Realist - the idea that God is covertly in communication with people is something I don't believe if for nothing else but the fact that God apparently is highly inconsistent. So - God knows who God is really talking to. However - if God ever does show up - I will personally pay for an anger management therapy session to work on that temper problem. If you are omnipotent you have to be taught that you can't go off and destroy the Earth every time someone pisses you off!
However - having said that - one can not ignore the variety of Christian charities and other organizations who's task is to selflessly help other people who are in need. These organizations are dedicated to the same principles that we Realists share - that we are /root and we do tech support for the human race. Christians become Christians because they have chosen to "do what's right" and to be one of the "good guys" and to be a productive member of society. And this is something that Christians and Realists share. But - as they say - the Devil is in the details.
So - in summary - Realists see Christians as an irrational primitive cult and prone to irrational behavior at times - and has an unhealthy view of the future. You are someone who we are stuck here with and we have the job of trying to protect you from yourself and to help Christians evolve into a positive and productive religion.
For the record - I was raised Jewish - sort of. My parents are Jewish - sort of - in name only. Much like the followers of any other religion of people who identify with a religion because of ancestry rather than actually believing and practicing something. I remember back when I was 5 years old being forced to study the old testament and thinking - no way in hell does this make sense. Having said that - Judaism is perhaps one of the least stupid of the stupid religions in that they aren't out beating on your door like the Christians do wanting to know if you know Moses. But come on! Judaism is based on ancient bullshit and it's time to give it up and move on.
Judaism is a stagnant religion that is stuck in the past.
Judaism is one of the world's oldest religions. The oldest one in terms of religions who created a knowledge tree that still exists today. There are other religions that are older - but forgotten - because they failed to create a knowledge tree. Judaism is the predecessor to Christianity who took a bad idea and made it worse.
Judaism is a prime example of what happens when you fail to admit that you're beliefs are just plain wrong. In it's day, 5000 years ago, Judaism represented state of the art thinking. They had the most advanced Tree of Knowledge on the planet. It represented the best of human understanding at that time. The problem is - their ego got in the way. God had chosen them - the Bible was the holy word of God - who can never be wrong. Their knowledge tree became frozen and as time progressed - it's real apparent that these beliefs are ridiculous in the context of current scientific thinking. But the Jews and their derivative religions stick with it because if they start changing things - then they have to admit that Jews are just people like everyone else and that there's nothing special about being a Jew. But they are too arrogant to face reality - and they remain frozen in time.
Pot is considered a dangerous and illegal drug in most countries, however, the reality is that pot is nearly harmless --- especially when you compare it to dangerous legal drugs like tobacco and alcohol. And smoking marijuana has beneficial effects in that it enhances certain mental abilities that allows the pot smoker to come up with new and interesting ideas that are practical in the real world. Pot can make you smarter as long as you use it correctly and don't abuse it. Many of my best ideas have come from smoking pot -- and one of those ideas was the idea of starting the Church of Reality. The Church of Reality is a marijuana inspired idea and if not for smoking pot --- this church wouldn't exist.
First of all --- this site and this web page is not a pro drug use site. There are a lot of dangerous drugs out there that are very destructive and should be avoided. There are also a lot of drugs that are harmful if not used correctly or used to excess. Anyone who is considering doing a drug should first become familiar with the facts about the drug and use it with caution. I have written web pages on the subjects of marijuana and tobacco.
Marijuana
- Telling Teenagers the Truth about Smoking Pot
Smoking
- Message to Teenagers about Smoking Cigarettes
Having said that --- the use of some drugs --- when used correctly --- can enhance your mental abilities and allow you to come up with imaginative "outside the box" solutions to common problems. The drugs that have benefited me by opening up my mind are Marijuana and LSD. If not for those two drugs --- you would not be reading this web site. This idea of the Church of Reality was an idea that I came up with while stoned. I therefore give credit where credit is due. Since Pot caused the idea to occur --- and the very existence of the Church of Reality is a result of smoking pot --- I therefore declare Pot as a Holy Sacrament.
First I will say that I believe that every person on the planet has a right to believe in any religion, no matter how stupid it is. I also believe that every person has a right to free speech and a right to talk about stupid religions and the reasons they are stupid, even if "people of faith" get offended. Just because I respect your right to practice your stupid religion doesn't mean that I have any respect for it, nor do I have to pretend your religion isn't stupid and/or isn't a dangerous and destructive cult. If you are offended by frank discussions of religions, you can leave now.
I find Christians particularly offensive. Everyone is going to burn in Hell except them. They have no respect for any other religion. In fact, most Christians hate most other Christians. The Pentecostals think the Catholics are all going to burn in Hell. It's a very dishonest religion and has a holier than thou culture; they believe they are better than everyone else. They like to pose as persecuted, but more often than not they are the persecutors. They tend to lie and steal a lot because they are "forgiven" and therefore can indulge in sin. The religion is theoretically based on the Bible which is, quite frankly, a stupid book, and certainly not written by a God. But Christians hardly follow their own teachings and are more likely to cheat and steal than your average person off the street.
Well - the KFRC deal fell through. They insisted on altering my ad
requiring that I put a disclaimer in it that "This is a paid
commercial". Something that I wasn't willing to do. So - they said I'll
be getting my money back on it and that's a good thing. So - I did have
some spots professionally produced by my old radio guy David Lewis from
back in the old days when I had a computer retail store in Springfield
Missouri.
Here are the ads: All are good - but I like the first two the best.
So - if any of you have any $$$ and you want to download these ads and put them on your local radio station - let me know. That would be a great way to spread the word. Also - feel free to post these on your web sites.
If I get more revenue than it costs me then I will take the extra money and expand the radio campaign. If I get less than what it costs me then the ads go away. Most of the money that we are starting with is money I've put in myself. And - this church isn't going anywhere until I get other people on board. But - I think I have a good plan and I'm hoping it will work.
Besides staying on the air - doing these radio spots is a media launch. I'm hoping that it will leverage me into the news media - get me on talk shows - and tweak the Christians just enough to get them talking about the Church of Reality. I believe that just to get the name out there - that there is a Church of Reality - and that it is a religion based on believing in what's real - and it causes people to ask the Sacred Question - "What is Real?" - that this will make a profound change in the world. And I'm hoping that you will see this and contribute to the cause.
As you know the Christian Right - that seems to be taking over Christianity - thinks they own America and that they are going to prepare the world for the second coming and the destruction of the planet. I know this is (hopefully) an exaggeration - but this is a country that has turned it's back on reality. We are having a very twisted version of "morality" laid on us and they are screwing with the culture in some very unhealthy ways.
To Donate - Click Here!
I believe it is time to challenge these other religions head on and compete for the religious mind space. and what better religion than believing in reality itself. After all - you don't get any more real than that. I want to work reality into the religious dialog and help other religions evolve in a more positive direction. I'm not out to eliminate fiction based religions. But I do want to keep them from becoming dangerous and hurting themselves and others - including me.
If you haven't fully explored this web site you should do so now. I want you to fully understand what the church of Reality is all about and decide if you want to support the cause. If you like what you see then come back here and throw a little something in the hat to keep this going. I know a lot of you are cash strapped so if you like this and can't contribute real money - if you can tell your friends and link to us on your web sites - that would really help a lot. Right now the mission is to get the word out and every time you talk about reality - you are sending the Sacred Message. We are one people sharing this planet. We are all in this together - and we are going to have to figure out how to make it work. If you like what you hear and you want other to hear it to - $75 gets it played again.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and to explore this web site.
The short answer is, nope, never happened. The story can't be
supported by either science or mythology. Even if you believe God is
all powerful and can do anything it still doesn't make sense. It only
makes sense if you are going to believe the Bible no matter what. In
that case everything makes sense. "The Bible says it, I believe it, and
that's that." If this is what you believe you should stop reading now
because what I'm about to say will only piss you off. I can't change
your mind and you won't learn anything. For the rest of you, here's an
interesting point of view on an old story.
Let's look at the math. It amazes me that I've never seen anyone
look at it this way before. As the story goes, God made it rain for 40
days and 40 nights and created a great flood that covered the entire
earth. Enough to drowned everything except fish. Our tallest mountains
are 27,000 feet tall, so if you're going to flood everything, that's
27,000 feet of water. For round numbers, let's just say 24,000 is
enough.
If you divide 24,000 feet by 40 days, that's 600 feet of rain a day,
over the entire planet. There's 24 hours in a day so that would be 25
feet of rain per hour, or 300 inches per hour. 7200 inches per day. 5
inches of rain a minute. That's one hell of a rain!
When you look at the math it's pretty obvious that the Flood of Noah could never have happened.
This is also hundreds of times as much water as what's in the oceans
and the atmosphere. Where did all this water come from? Where did all
this water go to? It's hardly going to run down the storm sewers. It
can't evaporate because the air would be totally saturated once just a
few feet evaporated. That much water isn't going to sink into the
ground. There isn't that much ground. And there's no geological
evidence that the entire planet was ever covered with water.
I haven't gone into the problems with gathering two of every species
and fitting them all into a small boat. I'm not going to talk about the
DNA problems of deriving species from only two individuals. Not going
to talk about where dinosaur bones came from. Not going to bring up the
possibility of animals, reptiles, and insects surviving on floating
debris. We're just talking about the flood itself.
Of course, God can do anything. He could have created the water,
made it disappear, and then covered up all geological evidence of the
flood so as to fool those faithless scientists. A flood like that would
have carved up the entire planet big time. But God must have erased all
the erosion and recreated a landscape that looks as if it had been here
for billions of years. If you believe in Noah and the Ark, then you
have to believe that God concealed all evidence of the flood and
intended to fool scientists.
Why would God do that? If God wanted to waste the planet he could
have just struck them all dead instead of doing the flood thing. Looks
like he went to a lot of trouble that he didn't need to. God works in
mysterious ways, and we mortals can't comprehend the ways of God. We
are to accept it on faith because the math and science sure don't add
up.
If you thought you were going to get off easy and that the Church of
Reality believed that everything was ok - you're wrong. The Church of
Reality supports a lifestyle the reflects our Sacred Mission and our
Sacred Principles. If we support The Principle of Positive Evolution
and want to move society forward in the Sacred Direction then we need
to live our lives in a progressive manner. We are people who are good
citizens, productive members of society, and we live our lives to make
our world a better place to live.
We however do not require a bizzare lifestyle like other religions. You
don't have to shave your head, wear an orange robe or burka, go around
knocking on doors asking people to accept Darwin or Newton, no praying
or chanting is required, no strange rituals, holy books to swear on, no
robes, beads, prayer cloths, piercings, snake handling, or special
diets. You don't worship a diety, not required to honor the sabbath,
(although getting some rest is a good idea - work hard - play hard) we
don't control who you vote for, no mass weddings, no vows of celebacy
or silence, no female oppression, no holy wars, and no deities will
order you to kill anyone.
We believe in promoting a common sense healthy livestyle where everyone
is encourged to be a productive upstanding part of society. We are to
be "good people" - the kind of people that others look up to - who
other want to be around - who others consider to be honest, reliable,
trustworthy, respectful, humble, and helpful.
Generally the Church of Reality subscribes to the principles of Secular Humanism with the addition of the religious responsibilities, as outlined by the Sacred Missions, added to it. The Humanists have already done a lot of work in this area and although no one it perfect they seem to be on the right track in general. So - until something better comes along, we endorse Humanism as the recomended lifestyle for Realists.
The lifestyle of Realists in general is based on personal freedom. We aren't here to tell you how to live your life. But we hope to be able to help provide assistance and structure in developing a good lifestyle template.
The Monks of the Order of Root are those who have dedicated their lives to the service of the Church of Reality. The term "Root" comes from the Unix/Linux computer operating system and is the super user. The root user is the account that has the power and authority to control all aspects of the computer without restrictions. Generally on a system where there are many users, only a few are allowed to become root and are entrusted with this power for the purpose of maintaining the system so that ordinary users can function normally.
To be root in Linux is to be given power and authority for the purpose of providing maintenance. The root user is a person who is given trust and is required to use their powers in a responsible manner. To be root is to accept responsibility for keeping the system running.
We in the Church of Reality like this metaphor and hereby adopt it. To be root in the Church of Reality is similar to being root in Linux. People are entrusted with power and authority to provide technical support for the human race. To be a monk of the order of root is to dedicate one's life to the service of the Church in order to keep the systems running so that ordinary people can live their lives and that the systems in society and in the church continue to function and can be relied on.
The Monks of the Order of Root are workers. They are the people who make it happen. They are the link between the visionaries and the real world. They are in charge of the infrastructure. They are the people who keep the heat on in the winter and make sure the lights stay on. They are the people who educate people, protect people, provide medical care, tend to the needy, provide spiritual and grief counseling, they keep the web sites running, they back up the data, they fix what is broken.
The Church of Reality is still a small Church. This is the current organization of the Church. It is subject to change in the future. Many positions are yet to be filled.
The Council of Realists - The High Council of Realists is the Board of directors of the Church of Reality.
Marc Perkel - Marc Perkel is the First One of the Church of Reality. He is the person who came up with the idea and is the person who is presently responsible for the creation of Church doctrine. He is the visionary behind the creation of this organization. Marc Perkel is a self taught individual who has become an expert in philosophy, law, computer hardware and software, systems administration, and religious beliefs. Marc is a writer and has an extensive web site at perkel.com. He runs a small web hosting company specializing in free speech issues. He is also a former systems administrator (root) for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Robin Gross - Robin Gross is a San Francisco based attorney specializing in intellectual property issues. Robin is the founder of IP Justice - a nonprofit organization dealing with international copyright and patent issues. She is on the board of directors for the Union for the Public Domain. She teaches international copyright law at Santa Clara University School of Law. She is on the Advisory Board for Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility - Peru. And Robin is licensed as clergy by the State of California.
Robin travels the world giving speeches, organizing, and advising policy makers from around the world on the impact of intellectual property rules on traditional rights and innovation. Robin has made it her mission in life to protect the Tree of Knowledge from being choked off by over-broad copyright laws. She is also a former staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Deborah Pierce - Deborah Pierce is founder and Executive Director of PrivacyActivism. Her work focuses on consumer education campaigns, advocacy, and analysis of privacy issues, with particular emphasis on data flow, data matching, privacy risks associated with data collection, and biometrics.
Deborah is currently a member of the University of Washington's Shidler Center for Law, Commerce and Technology Advisory Committee. She has been on several committees to help find solutions to privacy and security threats, including the Washington State Bar Association's Access to Justice (a committee formed to develop more detailed guidelines addressing the issue of the technological impact on privacy within the justice system) and the Federal Trade Commission's advisory panel on online access and security.
In April 2005, Deborah chaired the 15th Annual Computers, Freedom, and Privacy (CFP) conference. CFP is a conference that has played a major role in the public debate on the future of privacy and freedom in the online world and brings together attendees and an audience from government, business, education, and non-profits, as well as from the community of computer professionals, hackers, crackers and engineers who work the code of cyberspace. The themes have been broad and forward-looking. CFP explores what will be. It is the place where the future is mapped.
In her previous role as a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, she worked on issues related to electronic privacy, database information collection and personal identity. Deborah was the inspiration for the Sacred Principle of Privacy.
Administration - The Administration is the business end of the Church of Reality. The administration is run by the executive director who is responsible for the executive staff and conducting the business of the church.
Marc Perkel - Currently Marc Perkel - the First One - is also the Executive Director. Some day when we are bigger the Executive Director will be someone else.
The Monks of the Order of Root - Are the highly committed members who are maintainers of projects and have the power and authority to fulfil their missions. The Monks of the Church of Reality get their direction from the Executive Director.
The Beacons - The Beacons are the clergy of the Church of Reality.
The Membership - People who have taken the Oath of Reality, by accepting the Sacred Choices and identifying themselves as Realists. Through the Sacred Choices they have committed themselves to the Sacred Missions and The Sacred Principles.
What does it take to join the Church of Reality? It's actually not very hard at all. It's as easy as making a decision that you commit yourself to believing in what is real and that you will forego any current beliefs you have when you find out that what you are believing is not real. The Church of Reality is all about reality, real reality, the way it really is.
This of course sounds deceptively simple. I suppose to describe becoming a Realist as putting down your fiction based cult religion and replacing it with Realism is like telling a cigarette smoker that all you have to do to quit smoking is simply to put the cigarettes down and never pick them up again. But such a description ignores the fact that the smoker is a drug addict and that drug addiction is far more complex than the simple act of not doing something. Becoming a Realist is not so simple in a society that is dominated by religious cults and where you are programmed from birth to worship fictional deities. For most people becoming a realist is the beginning of a process of giving up a lifetime of brainwashing, to embark on a search for the elusive real world.
The real world can be a scary place. I wish that we could offer you all the false promises that other religions make. There is no immortality in reality except to the extent that you are remembered for your contributions to the Tree of Knowledge, or unless we develop the technology to become immortal. We don't have the promise of eternal bliss with an omnipotent father figure who is going to take care of us if we only believe and sacrifice large quantities of personal wealth to the middlemen religions that are selling you the ticket to your next life. On the bright side, we don't threaten you with eternal punishment if you don't fork over your bank account to the church. Our religion is based on the concept that we are here, there's a world out there, so let's explore it and figure it out. Let's do the best with what we have to work with.
Being a Realist starts by taking a personal oath by making the Sacred Choices your life's choices. You accept the Sacred Missions as the missions in your life. You accept the Sacred Principles as the guiding principles of your life. You choose to be intellectually honest and to take responsibility for your role in the real world. You are committing to a life of personal growth, that every day you will do something to make sure that tomorrow you are somehow better than you are today. That you will become a lighthouse to guide those who are lost in the darkness of the cult mind, to welcome them to the real world. This is what becoming a Realist entails.
An axiom is a self-evident truth upon which other knowledge must rest, from which other knowledge is built up. Even though we still question our axioms, a religion has to start somewhere and declare that certain assumptions are true. These axioms make up the roots of the Tree of Knowledge upon which our religion is founded. They form the basis for our world view.
Reality exists. The Earth exists. The Human race exists. Life on this planet evolved over billions of years. We exist. We function as a society. We share knowledge. There exists a wealth of knowledge that we as a human race share. We are self-aware. We have the ability to make decisions. We have comprehension. Our decisions have consequences. Our species is continuing to evolve. Our technology is growing. We have the technology to exterminate ourselves. We are aware of time. We are aware of the past, the present, and the future. We know that many life forms on this planet became extinct. We are the descendents of species that continued to evolve.
This is a description of the reality we live in. In many important ways it sums up our existence. It is what we have to work with. Will we survive and continue to evolve, or will we become extinct? If we continue to evolve, what will we evolve into? Do we have control over what we will become? If we do have control over our evolution, what shall we choose? Or should we choose extinction? Since we can exterminate ourselves, should we?
This is reality. Welcome to the real world. Welcome to the world where everything is the way it really is. A world where there are no fictional beings to fix our mistakes. A world where we are alone and responsible for our own decisions, responsible both individually and collectively. A world of great wonderment, unlimited possibilities, or terrifying consequences. A world that we can turn into whatever we want it to become. This is the real world. The way things really are.
In pure science the universe is just stars exploding and rocks in space bumping into each other. The universe doesn't care if we evolve or become extinct. It only matters to us in that we choose evolution over extinction.
The universe doesn't care about us. Stars explode. Solar systems are sucked into black holes. This planet is but a speck of dust in the universe. Our entire galaxy is but a speck of dust in the universe. If our galaxy blew up tomorrow it would take 2.2 million years before anyone in the next galaxy even knew it happened. If there were anyone in the next galaxy, that is. And there are trillions of galaxies. We live for just a moment in time. There is no universal right or wrong. Whatever happens is whatever happens. If the sun explodes, then it is just one of trillions of stars that explode.
The human race is very young and we are just beginning to become aware of what we are, how we relate to the reality around us, and the responsibilities we face in determining our future. We have choice, so what do we do with that? What shall we choose for ourselves? How will we decide to relate to reality?
Not all of the axioms of the Church of Reality are based only on objective truth. That's because the Church of Reality isn't a religion of science. The Church of Reality is about people who are exploring reality from a human perspective. We have created a set of arbitrary axioms, choosing to give value to the human experience. We have made a religious choice to create a doctrine based on the premise that humanity should progress forward and continue to evolve into something greater than it is today.
What we choose to do is subjective. And the definition of right and wrong become defined in relation to the choices we make. If, for example, we choose to end our existence, to become extinct, then anything that leads to extinction becomes right and anything that leads to evolution becomes wrong. If we decide to make up a fictional story and to dedicate ourselves to the fictional story, then anything that we do that supports the fiction becomes right and anything we do that goes against the fiction becomes wrong.
The concepts of right and wrong are relative to the choices we make and the principles that support those choices. These are arbitrary choices and, since we have free will, we can do anything we want to do. Different people have made different choices about their own lives, the lives in their group, and the future of the human race. Some people choose extinction. Most people have settled for a fiction. Some people have chosen reality. These are religious choices. In fact - the definition of religion is the choices we make in how we are going to relate to our existence.
The Church of Reality is a religion and in our religion we have made the following religious choices. These are the subjective axioms that form the basis of Church of Reality doctrine.
We Choose to Understand Reality and to Believe in what is Really Real - We choose to reject fictional beliefs and to use the abilities that we have evolved and to take the knowledge that has been handed down to us (the Tree of Knowledge as we call it) and use it to know more about the reality around us. We seek real truth and understanding and we choose to dedicate our lives and our existence, both individually and as a society, to this purpose. Because we dedicate ourselves to the exploration of reality, we call ourselves Realists.
We Choose Evolution over Extinction - We are Realists in the practice of Realism, and to explore our reality we have to continue to survive, to evolve forward, and to continue our course of evolution in a positive direction. We call this the Sacred Direction.
We Accept Responsibility - We understand that our actions, and inactions, have consequences. We accept the laws of cause and effect; we comprehend that we have choice and that the choices we make have results and consequences. Therefore, we commit to expend the effort to determine the right and wrong choices in relation to our goals to survive, to understand reality, and to evolve forward. We will work toward making the right choices.
We Own Ourselves - Our lives are our own. We have ownership of our own lives. This means that we have the right to make the choices that affect our lives, to control our own destiny, to be free to speak out, to take action in our own interests and in the interest of our society. We have the right to personal privacy, and to be secure in our person and our property. We are not the subjects of any nation state nor are our rights limited to what nation state allow us to do. Nations are an artificial construct that exist only for the purpose of serving the needs of humanity. Self ownership is a personal commitment to think for ourselves, to resist control and oppression by other people. To take back our lives and our reality. Because we assert our rights so do we respect the same rights of other individuals.
We are a Society - We can not achieve our objectives if we allow Extinctionist religions to succeed or allow fiction-based religions, which envision a future of annihilation, to prevail over our choice to survive and to flourish. To the extent that the goals of their religions deny us our goals, we commit to doing whatever it takes to ensure that we prevail. We can not allow ourselves, as a society, to destroy our existence and to become extinct. We support the creation and maintenance of a healthy society that is design for the sole purpose of serving the advancement of the human race.
We are Humanity - We are dedicated to the Positive Evolution of people--not government, not machines, not corporations, not monarchies, not religions, and not fictional deities. Our loyalties lie with people. Furthermore, this religion isn't just about reality itself, but about reality as experienced by the human race. We are people who are exploring reality together, as a society. Therefore, we have to take care of the human factor to enable humans to explore reality.
These arbitrary choices, our religious choices, form the basis for the Sacred Choices, the Sacred Principles, and the Sacred Missions. Together these religious choices form the basis for separating right from wrong, good from evil. They create a standard against which to test our choices so that we can achieve our religious goals. The religious doctrine of the Church of Reality grows out of the facts and choices upon which we base our religion.
Everything is evolving, including religion. So which religions will survive - and if they do survive, what will they evolve into? Or will they all become extinct? Who will still be here in 100 years, or 1000 years or 100,000 years from now? Will people still be praising Jesus in the year 102,005? (Assuming we make it through the Y100K computer meltdown where all the software using 5 digit dates all crash)
As with any evolutionary process, when the environment changes, the organisms have to adapt. This is true not only for living organisms but for social and religious organisms as well. During the Dark Ages religion was stable for very long periods of time. But those days are gone and the human race is in the middle of a huge evolutionary jump. New technology is changing how we understand things and how we process information. The Internet, which we call the Sacred Router, is causing an acceleration of knowledge. Information from around the world can be researched in seconds allowing people who discover new things to associate with like-minded people everywhere. If not for the Sacred Router the Church of Reality would not exist.
What effect will the Internet have on religions? No matter what religion you are a member of, there is at least an implied assumption that what you believe in is actually real. There may be some exceptions but if you ask most people if what they believe in is real, they would say, "Yes it is!" And there is some presumption that if they became convinced it were not real, then they would (eventually) stop believing in it. What is different today, as compared to centuries ago, is that you have a lot more information and tools available to test and see if what you believe in is real. And more and more people are putting their faith to the reality test.
For example, the Jesus story. I never believed it. But I did assume that it was at least based on some guy who actually did live around that time. As it turn out, I was wrong. I now know that Jesus to be 100% fictional and to have never existed in any real form whatsoever. I found that out by researching on the Internet and discovering things that I didn't know. These are things that I probably would never have found in the pre-Internet days. I found out that there were dozens of fictional figures who predated the Jesus story that had all the same elements of the life of Christ. They already had a God as father, virgin mother, mass slaying of children, miraculous healings, raising people from the dead, being crucified, and rising from the dead on the third day. The writers who made up the Jesus story didn't even make it original. They plagiarized the fiction of the times.
With this kind of information becoming more available, it puts pressure on fiction-based religions to explain themselves and raises doubts about if the underlying narratives are in fact true. If Christians, for example, figured out that Jesus wasn't real, would they still believe in him? I would hope that most of them would not. Thus, if a religion is based on fiction then this information age becomes a threat to their religious foundation. I would think that if Jesus goes away then Christianity goes away with it.
What is Reality? Is there an absolute reality or do we all have our own personal realities? Different religions all claim to be real but believe in opposite things. Is there a real reality out there that is independent of our own experience? Is there a way to determine objectively which reality is the true reality? And from what viewpoint do we assess reality from? These are some of the great questions facing all people of all religions, and one thing about us Realists is that we love the great questions.
We Realist believe there is an absolute reality which is the way things really are. Our religious doctrine, the Kernel, says that one of our Sacred Missions is the pursuit and understanding of this absolute reality. Since reality itself is presumed to be infinite we are committed to making the best attempt at understanding it. We also realize that we are limited in our pursuit of reality because we are not infinitely knowledgeable and we are exploring reality through the lens of humanity. We have only our human brains and the computers we build as tools with which to explore reality. That's not much to work with, but that is what we have so we'll just have to make due and take into account our limited perspective on absolute reality.
Reality itself is absolute, or at least we think it is, but our perception of reality will always be relative because of our limitations both collectively as the human race perceiving reality through the Tree of Knowledge, and individually perceiving reality individually. Our perception of reality will always be a subset of absolute reality, with a number of mistakes that we will inevitably make, and limited by the human perspective that will always reveal a human flavor on our understanding.
One person cannot know everything. There is far too much information in the Tree of Knowledge to keep in our own brains, and there are far too many things we just don't know. We therefore have to trust other people. and make working assumptions about the world we see around us.
In the Church of Reality, faith is not blind, but earned. We question everything. We embrace doubt in both the giving of doubt and the receiving of doubt. By embracing doubt and scrutiny, we work to earn trust, to be credible, to be accountable, to have a process that has integrity, and to be responsible for what we believe in. For us to be trusted, we have to earn that trust.
Why do I believe in Evolution? After all, I'm not billions of years old. I haven't examined any fossils. I haven't compared any DNA. In fact - I personally don't know that DNA really exists. I am relying on the word of others, people who I do trust, people who I have faith in, people who have earned my faith. I believe in evolution because it comes from trusted sources.
But what if evolution is wrong? What if space aliens constructed this planet yesterday and created us with false memories of the past and fake fossil evidence to make us believe that we have a historical past? What if the Earth really is only 24 hours old? Or that this reality is just a giant computer simulation in a higher level of reality. Those are possibilities that we can't prove are not so. After all, if we're just characters in some great video game, we would never know it.
Most everything we know comes from other people who we trust. We just don't have the resources to test everything ourselves.
Is reality really real? Is this a simulation? Am I the only person in the universe that is real and this is all my personal dream? I don't know. So what am I to do? I suppose that I am going to just have to pick one and go with it. So I'm going to put my faith in reality. And if we are a computer generated simulation, then it is still the correct decision because the programmers want us to believe in the artificial reality. So one might say that Realists have chosen to put their faith in reality.
What is knowledge and where does it come from? How do we know what we know? There are things we know directly, from our own experiences, and things we know based on trust. Even what we know directly is suspect because we know it through our flawed senses and we understand it with our flawed brains. And everything that we do know is relative or related to everything else that we know.
Imagine what it must be like to be a newborn baby. You open your eyes and begin to see things for the first time. But what do you see? You see walls, lights, chairs, a bed, people, mommy, but these are all just images. The information goes in but it doesn't mean anything because a newborn's brain doesn't have very much knowledge to relate this information to. Everything is new. Reality itself is new. Learning begins a little bit at a time and builds up by relating new information to everything else you know. Over time you learn language and associate objects and concept with words and phrases and talking increases the ability to communicate and get information from others so that the young mind becomes connected to the Tree of Knowledge. Most everything we know is something that we learned from other people and what they know comes from common knowledge that is trusted to be true.
Of course the problem is that not everything that you are taught is true. We all know that we were filled with a certain amount of misinformation and now we have to go back and reexamine what we were taught to see if it's really true. But we can't reexamine everything. We are stuck with having to know things based on trust. We can only hope that what we trust is correct.
This is an article written by Don Havis that appears to be well researched. I found this on East Bay Atheists and I was surprised when I read it. Like most people who don't believe in Jesus I had thought that there was at least "some guy" in the past that at least existed. (Being raised Jewish and not buying Judaism I was hardly buying the "God had to kill his son for your sins" story.) I suppose that it comes from the same trust that the human race can't be that stupid, that surely this isn't pure fiction. It appears I was wrong.
Jesus joins the ranks of pure fiction with the likes of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, the Boogie Man, God, Apollo, Zeus, Yoda, Osiris, Spock, Vishnu, Noah, Aphrodite, Hermes, the Virgin Mary, Eros, Iris, Moses, and Spiderman. Billions of people believing in nothing.
I find this fascinating, I hope you all will as well whether you be an Atheist or a Christian. Truth should stand up to scrutiny and it is by doubting that we maintain trustworthiness.
Is the Church of Reality a cult? Are you in a cult? These are interesting questions. One thing that's common about all cult members is that they are all sure that they are NOT in a cult. So - if you are sure you are not in a cult then take this test.
The question about if you are in a cult is not a black and white issue. There are organizations that are clearly cults and others that are cultish depending on your perspective. And most all groups of people have some cult like properties. Obviously if you are a member of a group that is contemplating mass suicide, then you are in a cult. But what about people who believe in Armageddon, are they cult members? Especially if you think the world will end in your life time. Or, if you are looking forward to the end of the world. If you think we are in the "end times" and you are fantasizing about God destroying the world, you are in a cult.
A cult is every other religion other than the one that you believe in.
So what is a cult? The simple definition is every religion except your religion is a cult. I think we can all agree, no matter who you are, that there are a lot of people out there who are seriously being misled and have a lot of weird and dangerous beliefs. Some of you might think the Church of Reality is a dangerous cult. After all, we do undermine faith. But how do you know - for sure - that of all the thousands of religions out there, that you somehow found the right one. Or perhaps happened to be born into the right one. Are you really that lucky - or - do people believe what they are taught as children. Clearly people believe what they are taught as children. So if you are in the religion you were raised in - that makes you suspect.
Relativism plays an important role in what is a cult. If you are a Muslim, then stoning women to death for sexual events might seem normal to you. Many ancient cultures had Gods that demanded animal and human sacrifice. If you believe in God, then anything that is "God's will" is considered to be normal, no matter how bizarre God might get. For example, the Bible tells us that God killed the first born male of all the Egyptians. People who believe the Bible accept God's behavior as "normal". However - if you are not familiar with the Biblical story of Moses and someone told you there was a deity who mass murdered innocent children, what deity would do this? You might guess it was the work of Satan. And you would be wrong. That's because "normal" to a realist is that mass killing children is wrong.
The question is, who is right? Is there an absolute objective perspective as to who is in a cult and who is not? After all - if what we consider to be a cult is right, then they are on the true path and we are the misled. What we consider freedom might be the work of demons that control us through the illusion of free thinking. Many cults will tell you that thinking is the work of the Devil and that only through your ability to suspend all reason and logic are you saved.
We in the Church of Reality have chosen reality itself to be our frame of reference from which we perceive the world. Somehow the idea is that if you have to pick a point of reference that reality seems to be the logical choice. So from our perspective, cultness is judged in relation to reality.
Is there a supernatural side to reality? Is there any such thing as magic? Do miracles occur? In the strictest sense of the definition of those words, no. No real magic, no real miracles. There is just science that we understand, and science that hopefully we will eventually understand, assuming that we stay on the Path of Knowledge.
Having said that, there's also a looser definition of magic and miracles that is in common use. It is a reflection of wonderment and amazement. It can refer to things that appear to be magical and mystical yet aren't. For example to me a cell phone is an almost magical device. I can voice command my phone to dial up people on the other side of the planet and talk to them over this little wireless box in my hand. Every time I fly in an airplane it amazes me that something so huge and heavy can fly through the air. The Tree of Knowledge amazes me. That the human race can come together and produce all of this stuff requiring an amazing amount of organization, and that we can act like a hive of bees without the common person having any idea that the very language of the thoughts in your brain, was invented by other people. To be that linked in to the group mindset, without any awareness of that, is miraculous to me.
What most people call Magic and Miracles are things and events that they can't explain.
Computers are almost magical to me. When you think about it, what is a microprocessor? It's imprinted silicon. It is a rock. We could say that we have developed the technology to make rocks think, and we wouldn't be entirely wrong. We are at a time when evolution has taken us to the point of self realization, and we can now choose what we will become. We are in an age of great wonderment, an age where reality is more amazing than it has ever been. Why would anyone want to give up reality for a fiction based existence?
So - for those of you hard core realists who might be cringing right now worried that the Church of Reality is going to go off the deep end, that's not going to happen. I'm not diluting reality by talking about miracles and magic in this context. I'm actually somewhat diluting the concept of magic and miracles themselves, because what most people call a miracle is just something they can't explain with science. Not that it's unexplainable, but from their perspective it is.
I think it's a miracle that no one had already come up with a Church of Reality until now.
When I was a kid in the 1960s, I knew that magicians used tricks to create illusions. Illusions that looked magical. At that time, it seemed that more adults believed in real magic. They may have known that magicians didn't have powers, but still believed that there were people and/or beings that do. There is still a lot of that today, but I do think that the number of realists have increased. Many people are still confused about the difference between the unexplained and the unexplainable. And sometimes it's fun to play with that misunderstanding and make supernatural claims just to get people to think about it. As always, thinking is a good thing and this will probably start some lively debate.
Believers believe that they have an advantage over non believers. They believe that they have moral certainty. They believe that they can tell right from wrong and that it's black and white. They point to the Bible or the Koran and say that it's God's word and that's what they believe. Everything else is some kind of relative morality. But do believers really have moral certainty? Not by a long shot. Individually they think they do, but every one of them has a different personal opinion of what is right and wrong And their opinion is usually very different than everyone else's in their congregation. The moral certainty is just and illusion. Just because they believe they have it doesn't make it real.
For example, Christians point to the Ten Commandments and declare, "That's GOD'S Law!" But they fail to read the rest of the book that contains those commandments. If you point out that God demands the death penalty for working on the Sabbath and perhaps they should report to the executioner, for some reason they balk at they idea. I can't imagine why they wouldn't want to die for the sin of working on the Sabbath? After all, by repenting of their sins and being executed they can leave the "evil world" behind and be with Jesus. At least if I were morally certain the way they claim that's what I would do. But things are not as morally certain as they appear.
But they say, that's Old Testament. That doesn't apply anymore. Oh Really? What happened to, "I believe every word of the Bible comes from God and it's all true?" Who is to say what part is obsolete? Did God get it wrong? Did God change his mind? How can God change his mind if he can see the future? Surely you can't believe that God didn't know what the New Testament would have in it when he wrote the Old Testament, or did the rules change? If God is changing the rules then maybe the rules have changed again in the last 2000 years? And if God can change his mind then do we still have moral certainty? I don't think so!
Islam has moral certainty. If you're an Infidel you deserve death. Or if you are a woman who has committed a sexual sin, you deserve death. In Muslim controlled Indonesia you can get the death penalty for smoking pot, but if you are a terrorist and kill hundreds of people, you get two years in prison. Scientologist look at the rest of the world as subhuman. To them you can do anything to them because they don't matter. Killing the non believers is common among many religions. If you ask them, most will deny it, but when the Iranian Supreme Court condemns a teenage girl to death for being raped, that doesn't strike me as coming from a place of morality. That sounds like immoral certainty in my way of believing.
Just because you believe that God is on your side and that you read the Bible and go to church on Sunday doesn't make you a moral person. It's the difference between form and substance. It's going through a morality ritual but it isn't morality. Often people use the term morality as a way of asserting their moral superiority, or Moral Masturbation. It is a trick that religions use to keep you plugged in to the Cult Mind, but it is all just an illusion. It's fake morality and it makes you to live the lie.
To us the term "Moral Certainty" mean that it is both moral and certain. Let us focus on the certainty part because we can argue morality forever. If something is certain that means it is clear and without question. To me it mean that everyone who believes a certain way will all agree on what they believe in. For example, all Christians agree on what is moral and you can ask any one of them and they will all say the same thing? See what I mean?
If believers can't agree on what moral certainty is then it isn't certain.
The problem is that if you rely on a fictional deity to tell you what to do, then you have a problem with the deity not being consistent. If the deity tells people the opposite things then you lose certainty and it's anyone's guess which one is moral. In fact this is one of those objective tests that indicate to me if a religion is controlled by an invisible omnipotent deity, or if it's just an illusion. If God exists and if God is talking to people, then these people who God is talking to should get the same message. For example, I am real. When everyone reads this web site they all see the same words. And if you asked someone what they read, it would be fairly consistent. But when you talk to people who converse with God, they all have a different and often conflicting story. This make me think that they are just making it up.
What is being put out as morality and certainty is neither moral nor certain. It is words without substance. When you purify the truth of it, you determine that it is really bullshit. If we can't be certain about moral certainty, then we don't really have moral certainty do we?
Does the Church of Reality have a hidden agenda? Do we have a secret plan? What is it we are "really" up to? In an age where everyone is lying about something, what is the Church of Reality really about? Is it politics? Is it world domination? Are we really Satan's minions?
So yeah, we have a plan. We have a plot. We are up to something. But what is it? Is the Church of Reality really going to reveal it? Sure we are! Would we lie to you?
We are really just trying to trick religious people into thinking.
Our hidden agenda is - we are trying to trick people into thinking. Thinking about reality that is. We believe that if people start thinking about reality that it will cause them to ask themselves if what they believe in is real. Will this undermine faith? It will undermine blind faith. We want to perform a faith healing on faith itself so that the blindly faithful will see again. We want to take the blindness out of blind faith.
Making people think is what we are really up to. Realism is a religion of the mind. You try to resist it but you can't. You can pray and pray and as hard as you try not to - you just can't help it. All of a sudden there you are, thinking. Thinking about reality - reality the way it really is. It seduces you, sucks you in. You start wondering if what you believe is really real. The temptation is too strong to resist. You can feel reality all around you and you can't help but to wonder what it is. And when you are thinking about reality you are becoming real in the sacred moment. And during that time you become one of us. Resistance is futile. ha ha ha ha ha ... heh
What do concepts like Greed, Selfishness, Generosity and Selflessness have to do with reality? Not a lot. Reality exists and what is real doesn't depend on our behavior. The Earth will continue to orbit the Sun no matter what we do. But the Church of Reality is about more than just believing in what is real. It is about exploring reality and increasing our understanding of reality. It is about the relationship of the human race to reality and reality as experienced by humanity. That is what makes the religion of reality different from science. And because we as Realists have chosen to expand our understanding of reality, the way we organize as a society to do that together is important to the success of our mission.
As a religion we have accepted the exploration of reality as one of our missions. We know that in order to accomplish this we need to grow the Tree of Knowledge and increase the sum total of our collective human understanding. This is the way for us to evolve in the Sacred Direction. Since it is necessary for us to act as a community to accomplish our goal, it would seem that freely sharing information, generosity, and selflessness are the most logical strategy to achieve this goal. It is in our self-interest to be selfless. To that end, we adopt the Philosophy of the Open Hand as our way of living in a reality based community.
The Philosophy of the Open Hand is both for giving and for taking. It recognizes both our collective nature living in harmony with our individual nature. The individual gives of himself for the benifit of all and the individual takes the resources they need to survive.
Humanity has an interesting dual existence. On one hand we are all individuals while on the other hand we are a huge collective sharing the Tree of Knowledge. We are also all members of many overlapping groups sharing a common purpose with other people and trusting other people to come up with information that we rely upon. Much of the language in the Church of Reality has focused on group mind, cult mind, and group-think issues and some people might think that the Church of Reality values the collective mind over that of the individual. But that is not the case.
The Church of Reality is strongly in favor of individualism. We also don't see a conflict between individual and collective thinking as long as it is done right. And of course how to do that right is what the Church of Reality is all about as we tread the thin line between being cooperative and the cult mind.
Humanity by nature organizes into groups. It's an evolutionary trait that has served humanity well for the most part. But it all depends on the nature of the group. If the group is a group of free thinkers, then you will have a group that has a dynamic of healthy disagreement, where a cult group will all be mindlessly parroting the same script. The Church of Reality, of course, aspires to be an example of the first type of group. In fact, we look at disagreement as a sign of healthy individualism where too much agreement might indicate a move towards mindless following. So to disagree and have healthy debate is a good thing.
AMAZING REALITY
(sing to tune of “Amazing Grace”)
Amazing things I see each day
Before my very own eyes
Things that can not be explained away
They are real and are not lies
'Twas thinking mind and open eyes
That allowed me to find
All the wonder that in reality lies
Available to anyone with open mind
I live a life with no need for delusions
To enjoy all of life’s grandeur
There is no need for grand illusions
When amazing reality has such allure
There is beauty in all that is real
I am real and believe you are too
Think about it and here is the deal
Amazing Reality shows the world to you
by Gena Hendrix
Many religions, especially Christians, believe that you are saved by faith. In fact that is the only criteria. If you don't have faith then you don't get into Heaven, end of story. It doesn't matter how good you are or what works you did - it all rests on faith. So if faith is so important, then what is it?
If Salvation is based on faith, and if faith is believing without proof, then proving God is real undermines salvation.
Faith means to believe in something without evidence or proof. Using the term in the Christian sense, faith is required. You have to make a commitment to accept statements as true without evidence or proof. In fact, that is God's test to see if you can believe in him without any reason other than trust in the authority of the church and it's holy books. And you are prohibited from doubting, questioning, scrutinizing, or putting the object of faith to the test. Once something that relies on faith is proven, then it becomes science. If everything were proven, then there would be nothing left that is real to have faith in.
The requirement of faith puts an interesting twist in the rules. If faith were optional, then it wouldn't matter how you believed in something. But when the test of salvation is based not on what you believe in, but how you believe in it, i.e. faith, then if you don't believe in it by that method, you burn in Hell forever. Based on this, science can not lead you to God because if you get to God through science then you don't have faith and you got there the wrong way. There isn't anything in the Bible that indicates that you are saved through scientific discovery. It's about faith, and only faith.
The death penalty is not an easy issue and deciding to oppose executions is a difficult choice to make. Certainly in the case of gruesome murders our instinct is to get revenge. A person who slaughters another person doesn't deserve to live. But what is best for civilization? Is it better for society as a whole to execute people even if they clearly deserve to be executed? Or is it better for some people to escape what they deserve because the cost to society as a whole is too great? This is an extremely difficult call to make and both sides of the argument have merit. But after careful consideration the Church of Reality comes down on the side of opposing executions because the down side of executing people far exceeds the up side.
How does one make a decision for or against the death penalty? What is the overriding factor that we have to consider as most important in taking this position? When no solution is perfect and each position has merit how do we decide which one is best? How do we decide who wins and who loses? How do we apply our wisdom to this issue?
As we see it, the decision rests on what is best for society as a whole and after a lot of consideration, we have determined that in order to execute the guilty, even if you accept that they clearly deserve to die and you have no moral barriers to killing murderers, that the cost to society to kill those people is far greater than the lesser punishment of life in prison. That the difference in justice between death and life in jail is not sufficient to justify the costs to society of allowing nation-states the power of death. In practice, too many innocent people are unjustly executed and the lives of the innocent people are more important than the justice differential between life in prison and execution. Even if the death penalty were justified, the cost in innocent lives makes it not worth it.
What is the relationship between one’s personal reality and "real" reality? What is reality and why does it exist? These are the questions that we Realists explore. Have you ever wondered if reality is just your own personal illusion and that you are the only person in the world that is really real? Perhaps you are really a space alien and this world is a computer generated training experience where you are put in a simulated reality to train for some higher purpose. If that is so then what you are reading here is part of the simulation. But perhaps I am the one who is real and you are all part of my illusion. After all, as the founder of the Church of Reality, if that isn't a hint that this is my illusion, I don't know what is.
One thing we do know is that we can't all be in control personally of a common objective reality. So I'm going to accept that either this is a really good personal illusion or that I'm just part of a larger objective reality. In either case the appropriate thing to do is to live life assuming that this is not a personal illusion and that we are all part of a greater reality.
Since the world can be all of our personal illusions, there must be some greater reality that we are all part of.
Objective reality exists. The universe is about 15 billion years older than I am. I didn't create reality, reality created me. I am part of reality and I have, or at least seem to have, a limited influence over a very small part of it. For the most part I am an observer. I get to see a very small part of this planet, a planet that orbits a star that is one of billions of stars in a galaxy that is but one of trillions of galaxies in the universe. And I exist for an extremely brief period of time. I am witness to a very small slice of reality as seen from my perspective. Nevertheless, it is all I have to work with so I'll do the best with what I have.
Reality is the great unknown. It is huge. It is beyond imagination. It is incomprehensible. Yet we attempt to comprehend it. Even though our minds are limited we have banded together to share knowledge and link our minds together in a great neural network to explore, store, and share vast amounts of information about ourselves and the reality we live in.
In addition to our biological bodies and brains that act as crude computers, we have built machines to aid us. Information is no longer stored in biological brains that forget and die. We have digital memory to store facts. We launch telescopes into space to peer back to the beginning of time and space itself. We can now surf the web and post our thoughts online for all to read. We can communicate across the planet with text, voice, pictures, and video. Yet we still know very little about our existence. However, we continue to learn more.
Your personal reality is your perception or experience of the greater objective reality.
Individually, we are each just one of billions of observers each with our own perspective of reality. We see reality from our point of view. We are born in a location and raised by parents and in a community. We are taught a language with which to communicate. We are exposed to ideas and we are given knowledge from the Tree of Knowledge. This becomes our reality, our personal reality, or reality from our perspective.
Many common words are reality related and depends on reality for meaning. For example, the word Truth means that something is true in respect to reality. That it is really true as opposed to a personal belief where a person chooses to believe that something is true or that something might seem to be true from an individual perspective. In terms of absolutes the very definition of True and False is in the context of if it is true or false in reality.
Similarly the word Existence means does something exist in reality. The question "Does God Exist?" for example is really asking if God is real. It is asking, "Does God exist in the context of reality?" If one asks, "Is Zeus real?" they are not asking if you believe that Zeus is real. They are asking if Zeus exists irrespective of personal belief or observation.
Words like Existence and Truth are reality related words because they have no stand outside the context of reality. God, for example, can not be real unless there is a reality for him to exist within. To envoke these words is to measure something in the context of it's status in reality.
The Church of Reality is a 501(c)3 tax exempt not for profit organization recognized by the IRS. Here is the initial letter approving our status. The image is slightly edited in that it was originally 2 pages and I merged them.
In the spirit of Individualism Realists can and are encouraged to wear just about anything they want. There are of course some limitations on what is appropriate, or what is so strange, that it's not appropriate. But a realist can push the line some and should not be constrained by the tastes of others. One has the freedom to make their own decisions about how they want to physically appear and express who they are by how they choose to look.
There are limitations on this based on some common sense restrictions. There are places where nudity is accepted and places where it isn't. In general the Church of Reality accepts the culture of the City of San Francisco as a guideline as to what is too strange to wear. If it will get you arrested in San Francisco it's probably over the line.
Drugs are both helpful and detrimental depending on how you use them. Drugs are very powerful substances that require great caution for a variety of reasons.
When used correctly, drugs can cure diseases, treat depression, control pain, improve one's insight into reality, and be of great benefit.
When used incorrectly drugs can result in a lifestyle of addiction, can ruin one's health, and cause one to make regrettable decisions. While under the influence one might crash a car, might be killed. Some drugs are illegal and you can go to jail if you are caught using them.
Whenever a realist considers the use of drugs, legally or illegally, great care should be taken to ensure that drugs are used in a manner that is best for the individual and the people around them. No matter what drug you are thinking about using a Realist should act in a responsible manner and always use good judgment when deciding to use any drug whether legal or not.
Realists culture includes the idea that the individual enjoy a great amount of Freedom in their personal choices and that we are strongly individualistic and that we Own Ourselves. However the price of personal freedom is Personal Responsibility. If we are to be free to choose the path of our lives then we also must Respect society and the lives, safety, and rights of other people. We have to use Wisdom in our decisions about drugs so that any decision that we make regarding drug use takes into account all aspects of the consequences of our decisions.
The Church of Reality recognizes the absolute right of a woman to choose if she will reproduce or not. Reproduction is one of the most important choices a woman has to make and she cannot be forced to have children that she doesn't want to have. The Church of Reality considers reproduction to be one of the most fundamental personal freedoms a person can have and it is just plain wrong to take that choice away and impose the will of other people upon the individual who is pregnant.
Realist women have an absolute right to contraception and abortion services.
A woman must be able to choose to get an abortion for any reason or for no reason at all other than she chooses not to reproduce. A woman must be able to have access to all forms of contraception in order to control her reproduction. Church of Reality women are entitled to emergency contraceptive services in hospitals to prevent pregnancy in cases of rape or any other condition where emergency contraception is required.
We're not going to solve the overpopulation problem by forcing women to reproduce against their will.
In order to have a well functioning society where reality can be fully explored we have to take control and manage when we choose to reproduce. We humans are biologically programmed through evolution with more sexual desire than is necessary to maintain a healthy population. In fact this planet is overpopulated. We humans need to drastically reduce our collective reproduction rate and lower the population of the planet to a sustainable level. The first and obvious step in that direction is to allow women to terminate unwanted pregnancies. That way women can reproduce when they choose to and are ready to raise children.
My life - my choice. Even if it's the wrong choice it is my choice to make.
But on a more fundamental level we Realists are a culture of Self Ownership where every individual is writing their own Life Story. It's our lives and our choice. Even if it is the wrong choice it is our wrong choice to make. It is our religious assertion that no government or other religion has the right to impose their religious standards upon us and infringe on our religious liberties to fully control our reproductive choices.
Medicine is about the rights and health of the patient, not the religious views of the doctor or the religious organization that owns the hospital.
If a doctor, for example has a problem providing contraceptive services or abortion services then that person should not be in a position to deny services to Realists who require them. Medicine is all about the patient, not the doctor, and the rights, choices, and needs of the patient trump those of the doctor. Just as it would be ridiculous for a doctor who can't work on the Sabbath staff an emergency room on the Sabbath; a doctor who is religiously against blood transfusions should not staff emergency rooms serving people who need blood; and a doctor who doesn't believe in contraception should not have the right to deny emergency contraception to women who have been raped and do not wish to become pregnant with the rapists baby.
One definition for "holy" is "worthy of complete devotion as one perfect in goodness and righteousness." The definition of "halo" is "the aura of glory, veneration, or sentiment surrounding an idealized person or thing."
The "R" represents reality. The halo over the R symbolizes that reality is holy to us. It symbolizes that reality is worthy of devotion. The halo says that we consider reality to be an idealized glorious thing. That is what makes the Church of Reality a religion and not just science or a philosophy.
The moral compass is a set of guidelines as to what is right and wrong. It is not an absolute rule. There are always situations where just about anything is justified, but those are the exceptions. The Moral Compass can be compared to the 10 Commandment from Judaism, where the Sacred Principles can be compared to the one principle in the Christian Bible of "do unto others as you would have others do unto you." It is different from the Sacred Principles in that it is more about policies and positions on specific issues and behavior rather than the reasons behind those policies.
This is called the Moral Compass because it is intended to point you in a direction by citing examples of what is right and wrong so that in any situation you can figure our the right thing to do. It is also a statement to the world of what we find morally reprehensible, challenging other religions and the non-religious to consider where we stand on right and wrong. This represent in part the moral identity of the Church of Reality.
How do we spread the word? How do we convert people to Realism? What kind of reaction should we expect when talking to people about reality? How do we get people to accept reality as their belief system? These are not simple questions. To people like me and many of you reading this, it's confusing to us that everyone isn't a Realist already. To us it's "Reality - Of course! Duh!" But to others it is a much more complex problem because they too think they believe in some form of reality, but it is often a narrative taught to them from early childhood that they have come to rely upon and accept as their world view.
Belief in fictional deities is one of the root axioms that they have built their awareness around and for which a lot of their personal world view relies upon. If they were, for example, to realize that God is fiction then it would change their entire world. Many of their friends will reject them. They might not have a place in their church community anymore. They would have to endure the stigma that other religions have put on Atheism as something that is evil, or a disease, a form of mental illness, something that must be cured. This is a very big step for most people who rely upon the comfort of their place in society and are not willing to put their social position at risk.
The first purpose of the human brain is to survive, not to process logic.
The human mind is not a computer. It is the result of an evolutionary process over billions of years. It's primary purpose is to help ensure the survival of the human species. We are the descendents of those who managed to adhere to that purpose. Those who survived and evolved and reproduced are our ancestors. Those who didn't are not. Thus our minds are biologically programmed for survival, to find food, to defend against enemies, to reproduce and ensure the survival of our children so they too can reproduce, to form societies for the mutual benefit of our mutual survival. Logic and reason are side effects of this neurological process. So the concept of reality might make instant sense to a computer, to a human it's often a difficult concept to grasp.
When you look at the brain as a biological organ rather than a computing device, a lot of human behavior is more understandable. We are a bag of chemicals, not a robot. Changing religions isn't like wiping a hard disk and installing something else. The mind is a living system and it requires more of a migration plan. You can't usually just rewrite everything a person believes in instantly unless they are in some crisis and already looking for an instant change. Change may take time, a lot of time. It might just be gradual over years. It might take centuries. But the process begins now and it is up to us to understand it as best we can so that we can put the world back on a reality based footing and avoid being the victim of some other religion's Extinctionist fantasy.
In a very real sense the Earth is our mother. We are the Children of the Earth. This is where we evolved. Although we like to think of ourselves as independent individuals, the reality is that we are interdependent with the rest of humanity and interdependent with the rest of the life forms on this planet. In a real sense the Earth is a super organism that we are all part of. This is where we evolved from the primordial goo together with all the other life that thrives here.
The Earth is our creator. It gives us life and sustains us. We must maintain her so that she can maintain us.
Because we are part of the life on this planet that all evolved together, we are dependent on the other life on the planet. We eat them for food. Plants produce the oxygen we breathe. Bacteria in our stomachs digest our food for us. Without them we would starve. The Earth is a composite life force composed of all life. It can be seen as a super being that we are all a part of. We are all here together, evolving, trying to survive and improve ourselves.
The Earth is also our home. This is where we live in the universe. This is all we have. And it is up to us to take care of our home so that we can thrive here.
Life on Earth developed through billions of years of evolution. Evolution is a proven fact. We are all Children of the Earth. All life on this planet has a very similar DNA structure and we carry the DNA blueprint of our evolutionary heritage within our genetic code. Evolution is firmly established in science and continues to stand the test of scrutiny and doubt. New technology is allowing us to create a genetic map of ourselves and reconstruct the Tree of Life which is our genetic evolutionary history back through time.
Even in our short life span and our short recorded history we see evolution happening all around us. Farmers use evolution to improve crops and animals through selective breeding. Only a few thousand years ago all dogs were wolves but through selective breeding we now have poodles. If we can evolve a wolf into a poodle in a few thousand years imagine the kind of changes you would see over millions of years.
Evolution is our creator. It is a process that allows us to improve ourselves so that we evolve into a better specie in the future. It is a way that we as a human race can advance ourselves. Humanity has advanced to the point where we can control our own evolution and the evolution of other forms of life on this planet. We have changed the evolution of species of life that we use for food so that they produce more food for us. This evolutionary change has allowed us to evolve so that we no longer have to hunt and gather wild food growing around our physical location. We now go to the grocery store and buy our food. This frees us up so that we can invent new tools and surf the web looking for explanations as to how life got here and why we exist.
What makes the Church of Reality a reality-based religion? After all, can't any religion claim to be a reality-based religion? Is there any objective test to support the claim that a religion is or is not reality based? Does a religion have to get everything right to make a claim to be reality based? Who gets to say what religions are reality based and what religions are not?
We believe that there are some objective tests. In the case of religion, there are two categories or types of religions. There are religions whose doctrines claim to be deity inspired and religions whose doctrines are inspired by humans. Because these two types of claims to reality are very different, we have to create a separate set of rules for each type.
Deity-Based Religions - A deity-based religion assumes that its omnipotent being (we will use the term God(s) to reference all religions' omnipotent beings) is perfect, infallible, and infinitely wise. The religion assumes, also, that their God can communicate with people and has expressed itself, and that their doctrine is an accurate expression of the will of their God. They claim that their religion is reality because it meets these necessary criteria:
That their God is the real God. That it is authentic. That it has established itself as a supreme being and that it is sufficiently omnipotent to be an authority of knowledge of absolute reality.
That God has communicated reality to the human authors of the holy books. That this communication is real, that there is a basis to believe that God used divine powers to make sure that the communication is accurate and complete, and that the communication was fully and accurately incorporated into the holy texts. The holy texts must be believed to be accurate, specific, clear, and not subject to individual interpretation.
That there is a verifiable chain of custody of the holy book and that it wasn't altered or tampered with by anyone who wasn't also divinely inspired. If it was altered, then there is reason to believe that anyone who made an alteration did so as a result of God using them as a conduit to get his changes made, and that the changes can be relied upon. Although, if changes are made, it raises the question of why God didn't get it right the first time. After all, if you are infinitely wise, omnipotent, and you can see the future, then why would any changes be necessary?
The issue of completeness is somehow dealt with. Since all holy books are finite, it must be assumed that the holy book either covers everything or that God is adding new chapters through some divine process. If the book is considered complete, how does it deal with new issues not specifically covered in the holy book? If it relies on humans to act as live interpreters, such as priests or prophets, how do we know that these interpreters are in direct contact with God to ensure that their word actually is God's word and not their own agenda, or even an honest mistake?
If some human fallibility is possible in the religion (mistake), does the religion support a mechanism to correct the mistake? If a priest or prophet gets it wrong through not having a 100% accurate communication link with God, how is the error fixed? If there is room for error, then how does the faith determine the probability of accuracy of doctrine and how do they deal with the deviation from absolute reality?
It would also seem that the doctrine would agree with science and that the word of the deity would tend to be proved to be correct and accurate as human knowledge advances.
As you can see, religions that claim reality based on divine inspiration have a lot of hurdles to deal with to verify their assertion. If a religion is truly divinely inspired, shouldn't there be consistency? Wouldn't God say the same thing to everyone? In reality, for example, the laws of physics apply the same to everyone, every time. If you jump off a tall building you will fall to the ground at the same rate of acceleration and with the same laws of wind resistance as every other object, every time. If an omnipotent being is accurately expressing reality through a supernatural process, wouldn't one expect that the results would be the same? Wouldn't contradiction indicate error? And if there is error, how is that resolved? Who is the true voice of God? If two religions, or two people from the same religion, claim that God is saying opposite things, then at least one of the religions cannot be reality-based.
We believe that in order to pass the reality-based religion test for deity-based religions, members would have a single, consistent voice and be in agreement with each other and with God. That those who speak for the deity would speak with a single voice, and that they would ultimately be proven to be accurate. That the doctrine would be both complete and error-free, that the deity would actually be infallible, and that the communication link with the deity would not be subject to error or mistake.
For example, the Bible would fail these tests for a number of reasons. The Bible expressly claims that its prophets are human and fallible, and are subject to mistakes. The God of the Bible changes its mind even though it is infallible, and claims the ability to know the future. It also gets angry, loses its cool, and destroys the world when aggravated by humans, exhibiting behavior unbecoming of a deity. Thus the Bible fails the reality test.
Human-Based Religions - Human-based religions are religions whose doctrine is clearly created by humans. Some of these religions claim supernatural events and some are based purely on science. But, in a human-based religion, it is accepted in doctrine that the religion was created by people and that there is a probability of error. The Church of Reality is an example of a human-based religion, and one of the few things that we can accept on faith is that we will always have mistakes.
So - if we are wrong, how can we claim to be a reality-based religion? How can we claim reality when we freely admit that some of what we proclaim is just plain dead wrong?
With the assumption of fallibility, the best that a human-based religion can do is to pursue reality. The pursuit of reality is the commitment to explore reality the way it reality is and to change your mind when you find out you were wrong. This means that a reality-based religion that is human based can not be a static religion and have a fixed doctrine. It has to be evolving forward. It has to embrace change. It has to be humble and admit its limitations. And it has to invite scrutiny and maintain a world view that allows and encourages positive evolution.
Even then a reality-based religion is merely an attempt to pursue reality, and the religion has to earn its place in history by being sincere in its pursuit. Since one never achieves reality, one can only make a good chase and record their progress in the Tree of Knowledge so that future generations can build upon their work. We are the Church of Reality only to the extent that we stay sincere to our principles and succeed in actually moving forward.
Some religions have a static doctrine that, for it to be a reality-based religion, it has to be 100% accurate, be totally complete, the deity has to be verifiable, and the doctrine has to be an original work of the deity. For a deity-based religion with a non-static doctrine, it is accepted that the doctrine isn't perfect, isn't the exact word of the deity, but that the doctrine is moving forward toward reality. Something like our Principle of Positive Evolution. Such a religion is both deity based and human based, but the humans know that even if the deity is perfect, the message from the deity is incomplete, or the message is subject to interpretation, or that people might have tampered with the deity's work.
For other religions to qualify as reality based, they have to accept that reality is a process of discovery, and that their religion is flawed. That their religion is, at best, a small subset of reality. That they have an evolutionary process for self-improvement. And - that they have a process for change. Anything short of this and they aren't a reality-based religion. The test for being reality based isn't so much a matter of the status of the current doctrine but the direction the doctrine is heading. It's more of a vector than a location, for those of you who are into geometry.
The Church of Reality by definition is a religion that is based on honesty and truth. We of course have to earn that definition by our deeds but it logically has to be intrinsic to our doctrine. After all, if the name of your religion is the Church of Reality then the name doesn't mean anything without honesty. After all, Reality is by definition the sum of everything that is true. If we start trying to pass off Bullshit as truth then our religion has no meaning. Just because this church has the name Reality on its virtual door doesn't make us real or honest. Integrity has to be more than a slogan. We are obligated to live it for real. We are a church that has to earn its name and if we don't earn it then we don't deserve to keep it.
If the Church of Reality doesn't commit to real reality then our religion has no meaning. We have to earn our name.
The Church of Reality is not an institution as much as it is a dream. If we as an institution stay true to the dream then we really are the Church of Reality. If we stray from the dream and become dishonest and corrupt, then we become the Church of Bullshit and the real Church of Reality will be a church in the minds of those people who stay true to reality and maintain the honesty and integrity that is required to be worthy of the Reality name.
The Church of Reality is different from other religions because it has made Reality its holy responsibility. The word Reality is its Sacred message. "What is Real?" is our Sacred Question. Our first mission is to grow the Tree of Knowledge. Honesty, integrity, truth, responsibility, accountability, scrutiny, these are our core principles. Our name is our message and it is our core belief. Our dharma is our commitment to the truth.
By taking the name Church of Reality we are making a commitment to humanity that we are going to honor the name as a sacred trust.
In taking the name Church of Reality our religion is making a covenant of trust with humanity to live up to that name. The concept of reality is core to the evolutionary advancement of the human race. To abuse this name is a sin against humanity. When a person becomes a Realist they are making a personal commitment to intellectual honesty and personal integrity. This is not a commitment to be taken lightly. We hold a sacred trust by claiming this name and it is our duty to the human race to be trustworthy so that the name has true meaning.
The definition of the word Edict is, "a decree or proclamation issued by an authority and having the force of law". In the Church of Reality edicts are issued by the First One with the supervision of the Council of Realists. The First One can issue an edict and if it goes unchallenged, it becomes the official declarations of the Church of Reality. If the edict is challenged by any member of the Council then the edict stands only if it is supported by a consensus of the Council.
The edicts include a variety of church business. It includes edicts of church law to address issues not specified specifically in doctrine or if there is confusion as to the meaning of church law. The First One can make a declaration to resolve any such issue. Edicts also include appointments of church clergy or other church officials. Edicts can be used to make church declarations relating to current events. Edicts can be used to declare if a war is justified or not. They are used to speak out against things that the church considers wrong or to endorse what the church considers to be good. The edict is the voice of the Church of Reality. It is one of the means by which the church speaks.
Any person, at any time, and anywher, can make the decision to become a realist and dedicate their lives to the truth. Anyone can pursue reality the way it really is. Anyone can give up living the lie right now and join the real world.
Haven’t you ever wondered what is really real? Which religion is the right one? Does God really exist? Did we evolve from pond scum? Is there life on other planets? Are we alone in the universe? Did time and space come from an exploding quantum singularity? Why does anything exist? What is time? Is there a relationship between quantum time and energy? What will humanity know 100 years from now? Did we create reality - or did reality create us?
We support the real answers, the way they really are. Reality is in all of us. You can hear it in your mind - feel it in your heart. Reality is everywhere. It surrounds us. It sustains us. The Church of Reality is dedicated to leading people into the great wonderment, into the understanding of understanding. You know that you want to know - don’t you? If you accept reality, reality can change your life! Are you ready to make a commitment to reality today?
Other religions have a fictional deity so why can't we? The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the creation of Bobby Henderson who wrote a letter to the Kansas School Board about his alternate theory of Intelligent Design. His revelation was that the universe was created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster and he used that to make a point about reality that Intelligent design is just Creationism religious dogma fraudulently repackaged as science.
The Church of Reality adopts the FSM as our fictional deity. As long as we know it is fictional there's no conflict with Realism. Since the FSM was created to make a point about reality it is appropriate that we choose him as our deity.
The Church of Reality also recognizes the Invisible Pink Unicorn. There is much argument as to her exact colour, her shape and size, and other properties of her nonexistence. She burns with anger against theists, and allegedly grinds them beneath her holy hooves. The "believers" famous sayings about faith in the invisible pink unicorn is that, like other religions, it is founded in science and faith. Science - that states that she must be invisible, since we cannot see her. Faith - because we know in our heart that the invisible pink unicorn exists.
The Church of Reality doesn't have its own physical churches. We started out as an Internet-based religion and we are primarily web-based. There is, however, another religion called the Unitarian Universalist that does have churches and have a set of values that are very compatible with our values. The Unitarians have been around for hundreds of years and the cornerstone of their religion is community. Unitarians are so committed to community that they have chosen not to have their own doctrine so that they can be as welcoming as possible to people of other beliefs,and to bring all people together into a single community.
Unitarians and Realists differ in that Realists put reality first and are interested in community. Unitarians put community first and are interested in reality. A physical church is a place where people meet to form a community. The Church of Reality has the Principle of Inclusiveness and one of our missions is to spread our message of reality to the real world. Since Unitarians put community first, it is logical to assume that they will probably be better at community than we are.
Realists and Unitarian Universalists share a lot of the same important values. We have the same moral code and our passions about society are almost identical.
The Unitarians have a guide 100 Questions that Non-Members Ask About, and we can find nothing in their religion that would in any way compromise our values as Realists. Universalists include members of a lot of religions. Christians, Jews, Buddhists, and Atheists are all welcome, and they agree to respect each other and to work together and exchange ideas. This allows Realists not only to share our views of reality with other people who are interested in reality, but also to learn about people who come from different backgrounds and have opinions that differ from ours. If we had our own churches, we probably wouldn't be as accepting of other people as Unitarians are, and would end up with a far less diverse community. Realists thrive best in a community of intellectual diversity, and if Unitarians can provide better diversity than we can ourselves, then it is reasonable to join with them in their community.
The Unitarian Universalist religion has been around for over 400 years. The Church of Reality is brand new. We have a lot to learn about community and it is an opportunity to learn what they have spent centuries perfecting. We also have the Principle of Humility that helps keep us in our place and keeps us from developing a false sense of self-importance. We believe that sharing a community with people of other religions who share our values will help keep us in line, and if we get off track, they will help keep us real. Someone to call us on our Bullshit.
The name Church of Reality is made up of two words. The word "Church" represents the human element and the word "Reality" is the scientific element. The Church of Reality is the union of humanity with science. It is far too easy to indulge in the science and forget the humanity. Left on our own, we might forget who we are as people and focus on the technology. It is good for us to form community with people who put community first and can help us stay focused on the fact that our religion is not just about reality, but also about people. So we are just going to have to put up with being around where some people worship deities in order to maintain our human perspective. Unitarian Atheists seem quite happy there, so there's no reason we can't thrive there as well.
Unitarian Universalist Principles include:
The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
Justice, equity, and compassion in human relations;
Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth
in our congregations;
A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process
within our congregations and in society at large;
The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice
for all;
Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which
we are a part.
We, as Realists, share these values. Unitarians aren't exactly like us. But they are close enough. And keep in mind that this is just for those Realists who want to go to a church. Going to church is not in any way required of Realists.
The Sacred Message of the Church of Reality is the word reality. One of the best ways to help promote reality is to help us get more traffic on this web site. The more traffic we get, the more people become aware that the Church of Reality exists. We get this traffic, in part, by people like you linking to our web pages, leaving comments in blogs with links, discussing the Church of Reality on discussion sites, and even - if you want - buying ad space on high traffic sites that attract people who are interested in reality.
The name itself, Church of Reality, is a very powerful message. If this religion was nothing more than a name and a vague concept that it is a religion based on believing in everything that is real, that alone would be powerful. Once people get to know that there is a "Church of Reality" out there, then it challenges other religions on the basis of what is real. How does your religion compare to reality? It gets people to think about reality and every time someone thinks about reality, the world gets a little smarter. And that's one of the things we are here to do, make the world a smarter place to live in. So that's what we need to accomplish. We need to get the word out so that every person on the planet is at least aware that the Church of Reality exists and begins to wonder what a religion would be like that is based on believing in everything that is real.
We in the Church of Reality are fortunate enough to inherit through the Tree of Knowledge some of the wisdom of the ages. One such document is the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This document written after World War II is a document of peace that is a strong statement for forming the basis of a civilization dedicated to the progress of humanity through Positive Evolution.
From the terrors of war came this decree in which the nations of the world made a personal commitment to each other to form an agreement. An agreement that would bind humanity into a single society where it was agreed to by the nations of this planet that we, as the human race, shall never allow mankind to reach the depths that they came from. The United Nations is an organization that made a commitment to the people of this planet to a path of positive evolution. In order to make it work, great minds met in San Francisco and formed a basis for that peace. That basis is the recognition that the individual has intrinsic value that gives them fundamental rights. These rights are spelled out herein.
This covenant between the nation-states of the Earth, prohibits torture, slavery, arbitrary arrests, government spying, false imprisonment, the right to participate in government, the right to have our own opinions, practice our religion, to be educated, to be secure in our persons and property, to associate, and to speak out. We in the Church of Reality commit as a religion to make it our dharma to help humanity uphold these values.
The Church of Reality shares these same values in our Sacred Principles. We see the Declaration of Human Rights as a starting point. This is a foundation on which to build a world where humanity will flourish. The Church of Reality hereby incorporates this document into our Kernel to become part of our Church Doctrine which establishes our Religious Rights.
The contents, word for word, matches the original except that the articles are titled for clarification of subject matter.
The Church of Reality discourages its members from participating in national pledges and any state sponsored public pledges of loyalty to the nation-state. Individual members may of course choose to participate if they want to because the Church of Reality's position does not take precedence over individual choice. We do however advise against it for a variety of reasons and we urge our members to consider these reasons when faced with participating in state sponsored acts of national loyalty.
Realists are a free people. We are citizens of the human race. We the people form nation-states for the purpose of creating organization in society so as to serve the interests of the people. Our position is that the nation-state is always subservient and the people are always dominant. A nation-state that requires patriotic acts such as the reciting of a pledge is asserting a position that the state is dominant over the people. That position is incompatible with our Sacred Principle of Freedom, one of our core religious beliefs.
State led acts of patriotism, even when voluntary, undermine our culture, our principles, our way of life. It asserts that the nation state is a super being that has dominion over its people. When the state sponsors public displays of loyalty to itself, it forces through group coercion, a method used to instill cult-like behavior, the individual, to either comply or to be perceived by others that the individual is intentionally not participating. This causes the individual to be subject to group ridicule as people form opinions as to why the individual refuses to participate. This is an invasion of the individual's Right to Privacy in that others might perceived this person as an enemy of the State.
We therefore encourage all Realists to refuse state sponsored patriotic acts, whether seemingly voluntary or coerced, on the basis of religious freedom as a statement that Realists believe in the dominance of the people over the nation-state. We believe that it would be more appropriate for public servants to recite a pledge to the people, to affirm at the start of every work day that they have the wisdom to better serve the people.
The Church of Reality is based on the principle that a person has self ownership. We have ownership rights to our own lives; the right to make our own choices, the right to control our own lives, to make our own important decisions, to be in control of our own bodies, to own property, to have opinions, and to express those opinions. It's about my life, my choice, my thoughts, my body, my property, my religion, my friends, my family, my lovers, my groups, my hobbies, my mistakes, my responsibilities, my survival, my appearance, my identity. I own it - it is mine to control. It is the ownership of oneself.
So - what does this mean? Why is it such a big deal? Owning oneself as opposed to what? Self ownership is an important concept in the Church of Reality because we live in a world where people are programmed to be submissives and to surrender their ownership of themselves to others. The Church of Reality asserts that people should take back self control and repossess themselves by asserting their rights to self ownership and resisting the oppressors that currently enslave them.
Have you ever asked yourself if you are truly free? Or do you assume that you are free because the government tells you to believe that? Some people believe that God or Jesus or Mohammed owns them; that they have willfully given their lives over to a higher cause. A person has the right to choose to devote their existence to a higher calling. I myself have chosen to develop the Kernel of the Church of Reality. I own myself. I'm not part of any cult. My life, my choice. Even if it's the wrong choice, it is my choice to make.
The Church of Reality takes the position that individuals own themselves. We are not a religion that requires that you surrender yourself to us. Cults want you to surrender your will to them. We are not a cult and hope to never become one. We do not control you, nor do we want to control you. We have enough of a job controlling ourselves. We want you to be individualistic, to be a thinker, to be innovative, to be who you are and to bring your ideas and your uniqueness into the community of Realists and share with us as a coequal member of society. We are a team model where members learn from us as we learn from them. But we retain control of our own lives.
To illustrate the issue of self control I found this article that had this illustration.
Perhaps I can best make my point by referring to an experience I had nearly twenty years ago, in one of my classrooms. In one of the segments of Constitutional Law that I taught, I asked my students whether the Constitution had any legitimacy. "On what basis does the United States government presume to rule you?," I rephrased the question. This question took us into a discussion of the subject of "authority." During the course of this discussion, a young man began to ask a series of questions:
"But how else are we going to live, if we don't follow others' [i.e., authorities]?"
"Do you understand how allowing others to direct your thinking and your actions produces conflict within yourself?", I asked.
"Yes, I think so," the young man responded.
"Would you like to learn how to live your life in a more self-directed way, without relying on ‘authorities’ to tell you how to do so?", I inquired.
"Yes," my student answered.
"How will you find out?", I asked.
"By asking you," he replied.
"Let me make certain I understand you: are you saying that you are now aware of how you have allowed others to control your thinking and actions by accepting these people as ‘authorities’ over you?"
"Yes," he responded.
"And now you are asking me to tell you how to stop living this way and take control over your own life? Can I make you a self-directed person?"
There was a long silence, during which one could almost see what was going on in this student’s mind. Finally he declared: "I guess this means that it’s up to each one of us, doesn't it?"
"Do you need me to answer this question for you?", I asked.
"No," my student answered.
The point here is that the Church of Reality can open the cage door and invite you to freedom, but you have to decide to walk out of the cage and own your freedom. Why have free speech if you don't speak out? Owning yourself isn't just a right, it's a discipline.
I am Marc Perkel, founder of the Church of Reality. Originally I wasn't going to write this section because the Church of Reality is about reality and not about Marc Perkel. I thought I could passively deemphasize myself but I think I should actively do so. And - there seems to be curiosity about who started this and how I came to be in the position that I am in. So I will try to address all that so that we can get past it and back to reality.
It would be easier if I were a God or a prophet of some omnipotent all wise invisible cloud being who spoke pure wisdom through me but I'm not. I'm just a guy with an idea and doing a lot of hard work in the real world to try to solve a big problem. I have no special powers. I am not the smartest person on the planet and even if I were - that's not saying much.
Most other religions have their pitfalls and I look around at Scientology and Objectivism for example and it's clear that I don't want to see the Church of Reality end up like them. Consequently, I'm trying to take every step I can to point the CoR in the right direction so that after I'm gone this religion doesn't degenerate into some awful cult that has nothing to do with it's original purpose.
Scientology was started by a science fiction writer as a scam to sucker people into giving him money in the name of religion and hasn't changed even though the original scammer is dead. Objectivism was started by Ayn Rand who got it right about objective reality and then went off track in proclaiming the virtues of democracy and the virtues of greed. She had a huge ego and if you didn't agree with her she considered you mentally impaired. Ayn Rand is dead now, but her inflated ego lives on in her followers, who accurately mimic the worst aspects of her personality. And that's something that scares me because I have several personality disorders myself. I am not a role model and there are some things worth learning about me but for the most part, don't imitate me. Don't turn me into an Ayn Rand!
The Church of Reality is about Reality - not Marc Perkel. There is nothing special about Marc Perkel.
I am not a religious leader because it's something I want to do. Like many of you, I don't like religion. It scares me for all the same reasons that it scares you. I started doing this because the religious insanity scares me even more. I don't want to be marched into church at gun point and forced to pray to a fictional deity as some people on the planet would like if they get control. I want to live in a sane world where I can spend my time contemplating string theory and building a better world than having to constantly fight off power grabs by Christian, Muslim, and Jewish cults. In fact I think my disdain for religion in general is a good sign because it makes me less interested in religious abuse. I'm not interested in doing your thinking for you. I just want you all to take care of yourselves so that someday I can live a peaceful quiet life.
What is a Gospel? What does the word Gospel mean? The word Gospel means the good news. The good news is about the future. A gospel is a message of promise and hope for things to come and we in the Church of Reality have a gospel because we look forward to a wondrous future for the human race--a future that we as Realists will help create.
Humanity is at a critical point in our evolution. For the last 3 billion years we have been the result of the Earth's evolutionary process. The events of our planet have caused us to occur and evolve. We used to be another species that life moved forward. We survived. We endured. For millions of generations life on this planet improved itself through selection processes. Those who survived and thrived became our ancestors. Those who didn't became food. We evolved communication and the ability for humans to network our minds together into a Tree of Knowledge so that we can explore the universe. As our knowledge grew and our technology increased we developed an awareness of our existence and a quest for understanding of who we are, why we are here, and what our place in the universe is. Humanity has evolved the ability to ask the Sacred Question, "What is Reality?"
Humanity has arrived at a wondrous point in our evolution. We are at the point where we can build machines to allow us to do things that no biological being on this planet has ever done. We can leave this planet and travel to the Moon. We can explore other worlds by launching equipment into space. We can alter genetics to grow the plants and animals we use as food to suit our needs. We build computers that greatly expand our minds and our human network. We are on the verge of altering our genetics so that we will be able to create new life forms that are better than what we are. We are in a position to choose what we will become. We are the creators of the future of our species.
Our future is what we choose to make it. We can and will take control of our evolution and decide what we will become. There is a price however. We need to choose wisely. We need to take responsibility for our future and our evolution. To do that, we are going to have to embrace reality and put out the effort to think things through. That is a reasonable price to have the power to control our evolutionary destiny.
The Church of Reality is a religion dedicated to the pursuit of reality and evangelizing the importance of making reality part of one's daily life. The word "reality" is the "Sacred Message" because when you say "reality" it causes people to think about reality, and whenever a person thinks about reality they are being "Real in the Sacred Moment".
The religion recognizes what it calls the "Tree of Knowledge" which represents the sum total of all human understanding. They believe that people expand their understanding of reality through growing the Tree of Knowledge which increases their understanding of the universe they live in. The process of growing the Tree of Knowledge is called "Positive Evolution", moving humanity forward in what they call the "Sacred Direction". The Church of Reality is a forward looking religion dedicated to making the future better than the past through making tomorrow better than today.
The Church of Reality is an "Open Source Religion" modeled after open source software projects. It has an evolving doctrine. The doctrine, called the "Kernel", is seen as the operating system of the human race. The Church of Reality currently has 21 Sacred Principles embracing concepts like Evolution, Exploration, Honesty, Freedom, Peace, Courage, Environmentalism, Compassion, Communication, Justice, Inclusiveness, Scrutiny, Humility, Reason, Wisdom, Responsibility, no Bullshit, Activism, Privacy, Historical Preservation, and Humor. These principles form the basis for morality, right and wrong, without the reliance on an omnipotent rule maker.
The Church of Reality does not worship anything or believe in fictional deities. As to God, the short answer is that they are Atheists. The longer answer is that if God shows up in objective reality then he will be considered real. The Church has however embraced the Flying Spaghetti Monster and the Invisible Pink Unicorn as official fictional deities. This being ok because they are known to be fictional.
The Church of Reality is a doubt based rather than a faith based religion. Members are "Explorers" rather than followers. People are expected to think for themselves. They believe in "Original Virtue" rather than original sin and recognize that most people are good people trying to do the right thing to be a productive member of a healthy society. The Church of Reality sees themselves as being members of the human race which includes everyone on the planet. They also see themselves as being part of the "Tree of Life" which includes every living organism in the world. The Tree of Life includes the Earth's evolutionary heritage all the way back to the pond scum that all life evolved from and a wonderment as to what we will evolve into in the future.
The Church of Reality is the exploration of reality by humans. It's not a religion about science, it's a religion about people. The Church of Reality is humanity exploring the universe, creating the great societies that allow people to explore reality together, and taking control of human evolution allowing humanity to determine what people will become and taking responsibility for our actions.
The Church of Reality also gives Realists a religious identity. It challenges other religions on the basis of what is real and causes people to think about reality and compare their beliefs to reality. One of the "Sacred Missions" is to affect the evolution of other religions away from Armageddon towards a more positive future of peace and productivity. The name is the religion and the religion is the name. Reality always was and always will be. Reality is eternal and it isn't going away. Reality doesn't go away when you stop believing in it. The Church of Reality may well be the next stage in the evolution of religion.
This section contains press information that can be used to describe the Church of Reality saving reporters the time and energy to extract all this material themselves.
Unfortunately life doesn't come with an owner's manual and the reality is that we're here and we have to figure out what we are going to do with our lives for ourselves. Many teens expect the adult world to have reality figured out and teach them what to do. And it's great when that happens. Unfortunately the human race hasn't yet evolved to the point where we have those kind of answers and teens are often disillusioned with adults and go off and make bad choices for lack of guidance and good information. All I can say is - sorry, and hope that the Church of Reality can provide some information to help you get a good start on life.
Although this advice is aimed at teens there's good advice here for people of all ages. So if you're older or younger and you find this information useful then that's great. Unlike many religions this isn't about being preachy and telling you about all kinds of cool stuff that you can't do. You as the reader however should think about what you see here and see if it applies to you. And if we get it wrong or you have ideas about new and better things to add, you get to participate. reality is for everyone, including teens. We want to hear your ideas and your perspective.
The Church of Reality is a religion about the exploration of reality both individually and collectively. It is about increasing our understanding of ourselves individually, our human society, and the universe that we live in. In order to do that we contemplate everything we can find to try to understand all of it. We explore reality through individual and collective contemplation.
We live in a universe that is incredibly complex and infinitely interesting. We want to understand it all, comprehend it all. Why does anything exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? So here we are, what do we do now? What do I do with my life? We explore reality with our minds. Everything is interesting to us. What we are, who we are, and what we will become starts through contemplation.
Contemplation is a sacred act in the Church of Reality. Some religions pray, some religions meditate. We contemplate. Contemplation makes the mind stronger and it reprograms you to live a reality based life. It enforces the habit of critical thinking.
This list of course doesn't represent everything that can be contemplated. This is more of a starting point to cover most things. You can also contemplate this list as to whether other contemplations should be added.
What we call marriage has different meaning to different people and different groups of people. Marriage laws and traditions vary from nation to nation and what marriage means differs from religion to religion. The way some religions define marriage and the way some governments define marriage is totally incompatible with the Church of Reality lifestyle which give individuals far more freedom to live their lives as they choose.
The marriage tradition reflects the evolution of life on earth and human evolution. As we all know we reproduce through human sexual reproduction and everyone one of us has a biological male father and a biological female mother. Science may one day change that but that is how we have and currently reproduce. Marriage has also been defined by other religions when the virgin marriage monogamy model has been promoted with a lifelong commitment and fornication and adultery are considered to be serious sins.
The human race has and continues to evolve and we have through science greatly extended our lives and greatly reduced the amount of effort we put out to just survive. Thus a lifetime commitment is a lot longer than it used to be. Infant mortality is down so women don't have to have many children hoping a few survive. Because of transportation and communication we are no longer limited to having relationships within the immediate local community. And because of our survival successes, excessive reproduction has become a threat to our continuing survival rather than a necessity. But without sexual reproduction humanity would become extinct.
The Church of Reality Sacred Principles includes the Principle of Inclusiveness. Every one of us is part of us. All of us are fully equal members of society and we do not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. In our religion, same sex relationship are not a sin. And it doesn't matter if people are born that way or if they choose to be that way. We believe in Self Ownership, where we make our own choices to write our own Life Story. Thus unless an activity is harmful to society as a whole, such as in forcible rape, forced sexual slavery, or sex with minors, we consider sexual orientation to be a lifestyle choice.
Although the Church of Reality supports multiple life styles by choice, the reality is that humanity also depends on reproduction to survive. Parenting children is an important issue and is related to, but not dependent upon, the issue of marriage. Sometimes heterosexuals pair off in lifelong bonds having children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren all in a close knit biological family. But more often than not, children are raised by single parent as a result of divorce, death, or pregnancy that resulted from a sexual encounter between people not in a committed relationship.
Many children are raised by adopted parents or communities of people who are not biologically related, but are as committed to a successful upbringing of the next generation. In the Church of Reality we consider the future to be our Sacred Direction. But "the future" we mean the Positive Evolution of the human race. Thus humanity has to reproduce responsibly and we have to raise our children as best we can.
Marriage is a complex issue involving long term commitment, trust, love, and pair bonding. It involves children and generational issues. It involves sex and sexual preferences. And it involves the law and social norms. Defining it in the context of the Church of Reality is challenging.
The Sacred Covenants is a commitment of the institution of the Church of Reality to the world that we will maintain our missions and goals so that the Church of Reality doesn't evolve into something other that what it was intended to be. People have often asked about the future of the Church of Reality. They wonder if it will become corrupt. They wonder if it will evolve into something that it never should have evolved into. They wonder if the church will be able to maintain its integrity.
These are serious and legitimate concerns and we take these concerns seriously. We don't want to turn into some horrible religion that is different than what we intended so we are trying to take steps in these early stages so that the Church of Reality will always be the Church of Reality and not some messed up religion that is using reality as a marketing label.
One advantage that the Church of Reality has over fiction based religions is that we are tied to reality itself. So if we get off track we have something solid to compare ourselves to. Fiction based religions don't have that advantage. If a religion is founded on fiction and the fiction changes then who is to say which fiction is better? But if you have a basis in reality then you have something to test against to tell if you are off course. Reality is like a lighthouse that guides us back.
However, as humans pursuing reality we are often confused and misled. It's easy to be tempted into compromising reality in order to be more popular or politically correct. So it is useful to build in safeguards and reminders into church doctrine because the dedication to reality as it really is has value and deserves protection. To that end we have the Principle of Scrutiny to encourage the public to watch us to make sure we stay clean. The Principle of Humility helps us resist the temptations of self importance.
A covenant is an agreement and a promise that one expects to be held to. It is a way of giving your word in the expectation that the promise will be kept. It creates a bond between entities for which people can rely upon. It forms the basis for trust. The Sacred Covenants are the promises of the Church of Reality to the people of the world that we will stick to our values. The Church however exists as a work of humanity and is not something that is divinely created or inspired. The church is its members and the members are the church. Therefore this is also the covenant of the members of the Church of Reality to the church to keep our religion clean and on track.
Every religion has a culture. There is a standard of behavior that is considered to be a template or role model that a member of the religion should aspire to. The Church of Reality is no different. Our religion is about people and the communities we form together. Since humans don't come with instructions we have to figure out the instructions on our own. We do so based on the values and goals of the Church of Reality.
Our cultural identity defines who we are in the world community.
Unlike some religions that are based upon what you believe in, the Church of Reality is based on what you do. You are what you do and what you do becomes your Life Story. Our morals and ethics are reality based rather than scripture based. We have to figure out right and wrong for ourselves and the understanding of ethics is a continuous and evolving process. We will never get it right. We can always make it better. To that end we produced this list of things that we generally consider to be good traits and things we consider to be bad traits.
These are not hard and fast rules that you are required to adhere to. In fact, there may be some aspects that you disagree with. There may also be situations where the rules don't apply. The idea here is to create an overall picture or template of what a Realist should aspire to. It's a collection of suggestions to teach people about what is likely to be the right way to live. And it is also a public statement to people of other religions as to what kind of people we are and what our values are.
It is often stated by theistic religions that good and bad are defined by their deity. That, if the deity goes away, then right and wrong go away and chaos ensues. Without commandments nothing will stop people from slaughtering each other in a "survival of the fittest" evolutionary frenzy where the strong males kill the weak males and mate with the females in an evolutionary frenzy. These fears are unfounded because right and wrong don't come from deities and we survive best as a society. Our world view is that our morals are superior to theistic moral systems because our values are reality based and they are evolving. If we get it wrong, we fix it. But if scripture gets it wrong, you're stuck with the mistake forever.
Therefore if you are thinking about making the move to Realism, you are not going to have to give up moral standards. In fact the standards we hold are an upgrade from that of any other religion. And if we find another religion that has better standards than ours, we'll learn from them and copy theirs. So even though we are Atheists, we are good people. Realists are the kind of people you want to have as your neighbors. We are a people who you can trust. We are good for society and good for civilization. Even if you are not a Realist, these are good values to apply to any religion.
One of the things that distinguish the Church of Reality from other religions is that we embrace understanding. We want to understand everything. Our religion starts where understanding starts. Most religions start where understanding stops.
There are two kinds of religions. There are religions based on faith and religions based on understanding. The religions are opposite in a sense because you don't need faith to believe in anything that can be understood through logic and reason. To have faith is to decide that you are not going to try to understand what you believe in because understanding would undermine faith.
Faith is a decision to loyally believe in something regardless of whether or not it is true. Understanding is excluded because if you try to understand it and you determine it isn't true then you are expected to abandoned your reason and believe in it anyway. The Abrahamic religions require one to turn their back on understanding, and it's in their holy book.
One thing that the Church of Reality has in common with Judiasm, Christianity and Islam is the concept of the Tree of Knowledge. The Tree of Knowledge in the Bible is called the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. The concept of describing the world in terms of Good and Evil is to experience reality through your emotions. Good and Evil are emotional evaluations. This feels good, that feels bad. These are emotional evaluations. One experiences and evaluates right and wrong with the "heart".
In their book the Earth was created in 6 days. After creation God creates Eve and they are told of the forbidden tree called the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" and it is forbidden to eat of the Tree. But they disobey God and Satan (the evil one) seduces Eve and causes her to seduce Adam to defy God and partake of knowledge. Thus the Bible makes the pursuit of understanding a sin.
Our religion has a Tree of Knowledge too, but we aren't a religion that relies on emotional states and the imagination as our way of interfacing with reality. Instead of Good and Evil our Tree of Knowledge is something we embrace. It is the sum total of human understanding. Our Tree is the separation of Truth and Fiction. The Tree is our connection to each other. It is our common link to humanity. We depend on the Tree and we are dedicated to the Principle of Positive Evolution making sure that the future is better than today.
What is the Church of Reality? What makes it a religion? What do Realists believe in? Why should I become a Realist?
The name Church of Reality is the short definition of what we are and a statement of our mission. The Church of Reality is a religion based on the axiom that the pursuit of the understanding of reality by humans has value. Realism is a world view and a philosophy of life. Our beliefs are based on what actually is real. Since no person knows all of reality our religion is based on the pursuit of reality as it really is. Realism is a religious identity and a culture of people who put reality first above all other beliefs and philosophies. Realism is the pursuit of the understanding of real reality as it really is.
If you think this concept is simple and that our entire religious philosophy can fit on a bumper sticker, you are in for a pleasant surprise. This religion is far deeper and more interesting than you can imagine. Although it has roots in a simple concept -- the pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is -- you will find new concepts here that you've not yet seen anywhere else. As you embrace the concepts presented here, you will find them both interesting and fascinating, and well worth your time. These reality-based concepts are a lot to comprehend and we hope that no matter what your background, you will take the time to read the vast amount of material presented here. Realism is both deep and rich and is as full a religion as any other religion on the planet.
Our gift is to give you something to think about.
If you are a member of some other religion and are trying to assess what we are, we welcome you to read on. We believe that all religions better themselves the more they embrace reality. We are a church of reality evangelists and we want everyone to spend time thinking about reality, talking about reality, and exploring reality along with us. And, if you believe in something and what you believe in is real, we are interested. Our religion incorporates concepts from many other religious disciplines, philosophies, and world views. We are always looking for new ideas that we can add to our Kernel. We are a culture of listeners and thinkers especially when we are talking about what is real. We can be "converted" and accept a new truth as long as you can demonstrate this truth using the Sacred Method, which means that you can prove your point using science and reason.
We believe that thinking about reality is good for you no matter what your religious beliefs.
However, it is our hope that we can inspire you to think about reality and to more fully make reality part of your life. After all, if what you believe in is real, and you believe that it is important for you to believe in something that's real, then thinking about reality and talking about reality should be no threat to your belief system. In our religion the word Reality is our Sacred Message. Our world view is that every time the word Reality is spoken, the world becomes a little smarter. Whenever people discuss reality that is for us Communion. So your reading of our Kernel is taking communion with us and we appreciate you taking the time to read this and making the Church of Reality part of your Life story.
The first step in learning about Realism is to learn the Vocabulary of Reality. Like other religions we have our own vocabulary to express new concepts in our religion. As you learn these new words and the concepts behind them you will more fully understand who we are as a culture and the foundation we are creating upon which to build this religion.
We were created by reality and we are trying to understand our creator just like every other religion.
What is a religion? A religion is a community of people who share a common world view and a set of moral values and have a set of common goals that attempt to give humanity an understanding of our place in the universe. Like other religions we ask who we are, how did we get here, and what is our role in existence. We are the creation of reality and we are trying to understand our creator, just like every other religion. Since we are part of reality and we are aware of reality and trying to understand reality, it can be said that reality understands itself through us. Each of us is a portal through which reality itself becomes aware of its own existence and reality understands itself through us. We seek to understand the understanding of understanding, and to know real reality as it really is. We come together as a community to share our individual knowledge so that we might all understand ourselves as a people and as a planet.
Many religions believe in the supernatural. We do not. We are a Reality Based Religion. It's a concept that takes some time to get used to. When you were young at some point you learned that a whale was not a fish, that it was in fact a mammal. That was hard to understand because we all knew that mammals had fur and lived on the land, and things that lived in the sea and had fins were fish. Similarly not all religions believe in deities or things that defy logic and science. This is one of the many new concepts to ponder in our religion. But this concept shouldn't be that foreign because, if you are of some other religion and if what you believe in is real, then you have the same problem we do. So if your religion is a real religion, then our religion must also be a real religion.
In the course of human evolution humanity has evolved speech and the ability to communicate complex thoughts and ideas. Over time this speech evolved to include writing allowing knowledge to be stored externally from the human mind. Through writing the Tree of Knowledge expanded greatly and people learned who to read and write so that then could receive knowledge and give knowledge back to the Tree.
Humanity continued to evolve past just writing. In the late 19th century and 20th century humanity developed the ability to record audio and video, and those recordings can and are being reproduced and distributed. Now in the last few decades humanity has developed the Internet which is our new more powerful repository of the Tree of Knowledge, the sum total of human understanding is now stored on the net.
One's computer is an extension of or physical brain and our thoughts are stored in both places.
We use computers, personal computers, as a tool to interface with our stored knowledge and to allow us to communicate with each other. It is also a tool where we store our important writing, papers, ideas, inventions, thoughts, and messages from those who we have a relationship with. Our computer(s) are an extension of our mind and that are as much a part of us as our body is.
Our thoughts are who we are and because of evolution we have evolved to the point where our thoughts are not limited to our physical mind. In the Church of Reality our data stored on our computers is considered to be part of what is stored in our minds. Our computer(s) are part of our brains. The thoughts in our minds and our data and software on our computers are considered part of the mind of the individual.
Realists have as one of our Sacred Principles the Principle of Privacy. This principle applies to the greatest extent to our thoughts and the workings of our minds. In our world view our minds are who we are and our computer(s) are part of our minds. In fact to a large extent the part of our mind that is stored on our computer(s) is what lives on after our biological mind is gone. Our would view is the mind is the soul of the individual and that our computer(s) are part of that soul. It is more intimately part of us that any part of our physical body and is our most private place.
As individuals writing our Life Story we need the privacy of our thoughts to make good decisions, or bad decisions, as to how we will live our life. We are a strongly individualistic religion promoting cultural diversity and experimentation of thoughts and ideas. Our world view is strongly in favor of freedom of ideas and a culture that supports unusual people who are resourceful and innovative.
Often in our history we see examples where the greatest among us were the ones that had a vision of the future which was contrary to culture and in some cases the law. People like Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela were individuals who dreamed a bigger dream where all people had equal rights. There are people in society today who are on the fringe of the cultures they live in who will one day allow the oppressed to rise up and take their rightful places in society. But for them to succeed they will need the protections of law that make the difference between them succeeding in furthering the evolution of humanity or if they will be killed. If the Indian government had seized Gandhi's computer, India might still be part of the British Empire.
Since our core missions in the Church of Reality are based on the Positive Evolution of humanity and that we all aspire to be like Gandhi, King, and Mandela, our minds, our thoughts, must be protected. And since our computers are part of our minds, for a nation state to search our computers is morally equivalent to them searching our brains. Our minds are the most intimate part of our bodies and we consider a forced search of our minds as more horrific than rape.
We don't know why (at this time) that anything exists. But for some reason there is something rather than nothing and we are part of existence. Reality created us and here we are. Now what do we do? Does our existence matter? Do we have a purpose? Or are we just pond scum on a planet that is but a speck of dust in the Universe? One planet amongst a trillion trillion planets.
Our existence might be totally insignificant or we might be the only life form that ever existed that has made it this far. We simply do not know and at this point and we have no way to know. We could just sit here and watch our planet orbit the sun 80 times till we die or we can choose to dedicate our lives to some purpose which might in the long run be meaningless but might have some meaning to us. We can at least choose to attempt to give meaning to an otherwise meaningless existence.
So here we are. We exist. So what are we going to do?
The purpose of a religion is to give some sort of meaning and understanding of our existence and our roll in the universe. As a reality based religion we don't have the benefit of an omnipotent rule giver who writes an owner's manual for us. Nor can we just make something up out of thin air. We have to have somewhere to start, a root axiom, that isn't arbitrary. We have to start with some sort of premise than makes sense. Something that we can explain in a way that stands up to Scrutiny.
In this section we lay the groundwork for the purpose of the Church of Reality by creating a root axiom that becomes a starting point that we can build on. In our case we are the observer. We exist. If we want to continue to exist and be the observer we have to survive. Our existence is valuable to us, and if we as a species are going to continue then we have to protect our status as a member of reality by continuing to exist. If we become extinct then we are no longer in the game and we become meaningless.
Thus our root axiom must include our survival, the survival of humanity. To survive we have to understand ourselves and the universe we exist in. We need to create a purpose for our existence and figure out what tools we have to work with. Once we have a root axiom in place we can build on that to create a platform for the Positive Evolution of the human race. It becomes the fundamental great truth that we can build upon as the basis for society, law, government, ethics, and morality.
Some of you might be wondering, "Why is Marc Perkel starting a new religion? What does he hope to accomplish? Is he trying to change the world and manipulate the future?
The short answer is - Yes I am.
I am a person who is in many ways dissatisfied with the world I exist in and I have decided to try to change it; or at least lodge a complaint and try to find people who agree with me that there’s room for improvement. Here’s some of my ideas about how to get it done.
I want to live in a world where people are smarter than they are today. I want to live in a culture that appreciates thinking, understanding, invention, curiosity, and philosophy. I want to be able to talk to lots of interesting people who live interesting lives and have interesting things to say.
Imagine a world where politicians are smarter. People who are elected by a society who expects them to take reality into consideration when making the important decisions that affect us all as a society. Imagine a world where you can get on an airplane knowing that someone isn’t going to try to blow it up because he thinks his invisible friend told him to do so.
I want to live in a world where people take their Life Story seriously and put out the effort to own themselves and decide what role they want to play during their brief existence in this world. I want to live in a world where people have some sort of appreciation and respect for the fact that the way they live their lives affects all of us.
My Bible is the Star Trek series. The Christian Bible is a collection of fictional stories about the past that were designed to create a system of ethics for which to form the basis for a culture. The Star Trek series is also a collection of fictional stories but about the future, rather than the past, that were also designed to create a system of ethics for which to form the basis for a culture.
Star Trek fires my soul because I to envision that day when the mind of humanity stretches across the universe to explore and understand greater and greater things. I want to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations ... to boldly go where no one has gone before.
I want the Star Trek future. A future that gets better from one generation to the next. A future from where we can look back at our new history proud that we took the time and were thoughtful enough to get it right so that humanity can thrive and prosper.
People of the world; is it not better to believe in what actually is real and not what isn't real? Do we need to have wars over "My God is tougher than your God"? Can't we give up the Bullshit and all just agree that believing in what actually is real is important? This world, this universe fascinates me. I want to know it all, explore it al, understand it all.
People of the world; isn’t it time that we put an end to stupidity when it comes to electing our government leaders? Would it not be better if smarter people were in charge? Can we continue to pay the price of getting it wrong when we could have done the right thing if only we had the courage and took the time to think it through?
How many of you turn on the news convinced that the news media is actively trying to make your brain rot? Perhaps the government wants us all to be stupid people. They want us to believe that there isn’t an absolute reality out there, that we are a part of, and that reality created us. I say, let us rise up then and be smart people just to be sure they aren’t up to something.
I don’t know why I exist but I know that I want to continue to exist and I want the human race to continue to exist. There is a lot of work to do to ensure that the future of humanity stays on the right track. It’s going to take a lot of smart people because we need all the help we can get.
I am starting this reigion because I want also to share my appreciation for reality with others. Reality is truth and truth is reality. There is no higher truth that that which is real, the way it really is. That is my world view and I hope to inspire you to bring reality into your belief system and make contemplation of the Sacred Question, "What is real?" part of your daily life.
I want to ask everyone in the world a question, what we call the Sacred Challenge, "Where does reality fit into your belief system?" It is my goal in starting this reigion that I inspire you to think about that question.
I’m tired of living in a world where one group’s deity is at war with another group’s deity, especially when they are referencing the same deity. It makes the deity look lame and I would be embarrassed to be that deity even if I didn’t exist!
My message in this religion to my fellow members of humanity is that it’s time for humanity to grow up and take Responsibility for our own existence. Humanity does not need an imaginary invisible daddy figure telling us what to do. We have evolved to the point where we are aware of our own existence. We now have a good idea who we are and how we got here. Now it is time for humanity to decide what we will become, what we will evolve into
I ask all of you to take personal responsibility for your life. I ask all of you to own it. I want you all to understand that what you do will become what you did. I ask that you accept that what is, is; and that what is not, is not! To accept that "to be" is the opposite of "not to be" This it is not the question, that is the way it is.
I want everyone to understand. I didn’t create reality. Reality created me. And I’m just trying to understand and appreciate my creator the same way all other religions are.
So if you are wondering if I’m up to something it’s pretty obvious that, in fact, I am. I ask that all of you turn to reality for guidance; that you establish a personal relationship with reality; that you take the time to look around at the reality around you and contemplate your existence, our existence, and existence itself. Brothers and sisters of the planet; reality has changed my life. Reality can change your life too. Every time you think about reality who you are is transformed. In that moment you become a little smarter, and the universe becomes a little smarter.
The national debt in the United States at this time is an artificial construct that creates an ownership class and a debtor class which artificially owes a great debt to the super rich. This relationship creates a form of debt driven slavery where the ownership class controls the slave class with debt. In the case of the United States at this time the debt is an artificial construct that is created by and imbalanced taxation system that favors the ownership class.
In 2000 the ownership class that controls the Supreme Court appointed President Bush who in turn managed to pass a series of huge tax cuts for the ownership class. This imbalance in taxation allows those at the top to pay a far lower percentage of tax than that of the working class, especially when you take income and payroll taxes together. This led to the reversal of the surplus left by the Clinton administration into a huge deficit.
The artificial imposition of debt is a form of slavery that we must not allow.
It of course wasn't just tax cuts for the rich that fueled the deficit. We had an incompetent president, two wars, and lots of bad policy that just wasted trillions of dollars. But because the ownership class got the huge tax cuts, they were able to use their money to extend their control over government and the infrastructures of society giving them stronger control.
So instead of getting tax revenue form the super rich we are now borrowing money from them. The government still gets their money either way. But when we get it in the form of a loan rather than a tax it creates and artificial debt that the slave class is obligated to pay back. So instead of balancing the budget we load the country up with artificial debt, and that debt creates the mechanism that allows the ownership class to enslave the rest of us and force us to give up our assets to pay off this debt that was artificially created.
In the period before the financial collapse of 2008 the ownership class was draining the wealth of this nation through artificial economic constructs credit default swap derivatives. Banks loaned money to people who they knew couldn't pay back the loans and because money was being handed out without controls real estate values soared to 2.5 times their normal value. Thus for families who wanted to buy a home to actually live in, they had to pay 2.5 times as much as they should have. That excess money went directly into the pockets of the ownership class.
Additionally the ownership class used their excess money to buy commodity futures like food and gasoline artificially inflating those prices. In 2008 $2.50 of the cost of every gallon of gas went to the ownership class. We now know this because in 2008 when all the investment banks failed the price of gasoline dropped $2.50 a gallon within weeks. All of a sudden the average person driving to work got to buy gas for what it was really worth.
The 2008 collapse also brought housing back down to what it was really worth. Within a few months the price of homes dropped 60% to the levels we see today. All of a sudden those who had no chance of owning a home all of a sudden could buy one. That is if you were lucky enough to be able to get the credit to borrow the money.
The 2008 collapse however resulted in another huge transfer of wealth to the ownership class. That's when the bailouts occurred which resulted in the bailouts. We handed out trillions of dollars to cover the investments of the ownership class to keep the banking system from failing. The excesses of the Bush administration nearly brought the world economy to a state of total collapse. In the panic to recover we passed out trillion, just gave it away, and added that to the public debt that the rest of us all have to pay. The ownership class tightened it's grip on the slave class. We borrowed from the rich to give money to the rich and now we have to pay the rich back for the money we borrowed - plus interest.
Then in 2010 the Supreme Court in their infamous "Citizens United" decision changed the principle of one person one vote to one dollar one vote. This has changed the political structure giving the ownership class control of the elections. They control the government - they spend it into debt - and then they foreclose on our freedoms creating an artificial construct where we owe them and they control the terms of the debt demanding we give up our freedoms.
One person one vote has now become one dollar one vote.
Gas and food prices are rising again due to commodities speculation. They can borrow money from the Federal Reserve at 0% interest to fund these investments, and we taxpayers have to pay interest on this money to fund them. The poor are paying welfare to the rich.
You may be asking - what does this have to do with the Church of Reality. The simple answer is - everything. This is a critical time in the evolution of humanity and we have to ensure that we protect our future. Slavery is the wrong solution for the evolution of the human race.
The Church of Reality starts with the Root Axiom that our continued existence is important. That through us the universe contemplates its own existence. We are reality becoming aware of itself. We have to continue to Evolve Forward, to increase our understanding of reality, and continue to exist so that we don't find ourselves Out of the Game.
To that end we Realists need to protect the structure of society itself so that we all evolve forward and that we not only continue to exist - but we thrive. In order to do that we have to make corrections in the structure of society to makes sure we don't end up on the Path of Destitution and Destruction.
A Better Way Forward
The Church of Reality opposes the direction towards an ownership/slave class society but rather one that is economically fair and competitive and has a safety net so that we can bring as many people on board and into a productive role as possible. A fair stable society allows humanity to have more Telescope Time to explore the universe and better understand reality to evolve forward.
We can not allow humanity to evolve into a slavery based society.
Although perhaps some day a society without money would be best, in the short term we need a balance between incentives where individuals get wealthy buy creating systems of value to society (capitalism), and providing opportunity and security for the masses (socialism). This structure is actually better for the wealthy because our total wealth is not a zero sum game. When we allow more people to be creative and work together for the whole we grow the total wealth of society through invention. Happy people who live in a sane stable society do better than slaves and there's more to go around.
We realist need to work to make this a better world and make sure we stay on track. We therefore have to do whatever we can to stop a small group of super wealthy individuals from ruling the planet. The first step is to spread this information and to unite the people of the world to commit to a fair society that we all can participate in. We have to come together to stop the meme and to not accept this artificial debt and take the financial infrastructure back and put it under the control of the people.
I ask all to link to this documents and to rise up and resist slavery.
Does humanity have a role in the universe or do we simply just exist? Many other religions define a role for humans, to worship and glorify a deity, and they challenge the Reality based Community to answer the question, "Why should humanity exist?" Does humanity have a purpose? Are we here for a reason? Is there something we have to accomplish? And if there is, can that reason be derived purely from science and logic? As it turns out - yes it can. Humanity does have a place in the universe and a science based goal. And when you understand it you will understand that our existence is far richer than any other religion has yet imagined. We have a purpose, and our purpose is clear. Let us now examine what that purpose is and how it is derived.
Yes! The good news is humanity does have a purpose in the Universe.
Before we answer this question, let us first appreciate the question we are asking. Let us suppose these three scenarios:
A superior race of space aliens lands on Earth and they are weeding out our section of the galaxy and they say to us, "Why should we let you exist? What purpose do you serve?" And if we don't come up with a good enough answer, they are going to wipe us out of existence."
We create a race of robots that have superior abilities to us and become a child race of humanity and they look at us asking the question, "Why are you still around?"
Since computing power doubles every year by the end of the century computers will be trillions of times smarter than we are today. Futurists like Ray Kurzweil predict that in the year 2028 that computers will exceed the human brain. At some point computers will be able to reengineer themselves, making improvements to their own design. These improved computers will be able to make themselves even better. They will control their own evolution.
Since we know that something like that will happen and that it is likely that they will become their own life form, what values should we pass on to them that will become the guiding principles of their evolution? What will we teach them about their role in the universe? And in order to teach them, maybe we need to figure out our role in the universe first.
Why are we as a people worth saving? If humanity has no greater purpose then for what reason do we deserve to continue to exist?
And, of course, one of the other reason for answering the "What the Hell are we doing here?" question is that I'm tired of the faith based religious community laughing at us saying that without some deity that we have no purpose for existence and that life has no meaning. We are after all the Church of Reality and anything they can do we can do better. Figuring our humanity's role in the universe is no exception.
New evolution is an engineered evolution. When a species like us comes to a point where we have the technology to start altering our genetics and interface machine and biology then we can choose what we evolve into. Natural selection doesn't entirely go away. If we fail we still can become extinct. But we can build a better form of life and that life will build something even better. That is if we get it right.
We are like a caterpillar that is about to turn into a butterfly. We are about to become something completely different. The process is already beginning.
Conditions of Use
Use of the Church of Reality website constitutes agreement to our terms of use. We encourage you to review the following information carefully.
TRADEMARKS
Church of Reality and Reality on our site are Registered Trademarks owned exclusively by Church of Reality. The use of Church of Reality is prohibited if used in connection church names or religious identity that is not Church of Reality's, in any manner that may cause confusion among our members or the public at large. You can not pretend to be us or to represent yourself as the Church of Reality without our permission.
COPYRIGHT
All content can be used freely with attribution under Creative Commons license.
PROTECTING YOUR ACCOUNT
Some portions of this website permit username and passwords to be used. You are responsible for protecting your unique username and password and you agree to be responsible for all activities performed under your user account.
CONTENT SUBMITTED BY SITE USERS
If you do post content to this site or otherwise submit material (including, but not limited to, photographs and testimonials), you grant Church of Reality and its affiliates a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, and display such content throughout the world in any media. By your submission you represent and warrant that you own or otherwise control all of the rights to the content that you post; that the content is accurate; that use of the content you supply does not violate this policy and will not cause injury to any person or entity; and that you will indemnify Church of Reality or its affiliates for all claims resulting from content you supply. Church of Reality reserves the right to remove any content at our sole discretion.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
This site is provided by Church of Reality on an "as is" and "as available" basis. Church of Reality makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, as to the operation of the site or the content contained therein. You expressly agree that your use of www.churchofreality.org is at your own risk.
Church of Reality cannot warrant that this site, our servers, or email communications affiliated with the use of this website, are free from viruses. Church of Reality will not be responsible for any damages of any kind resulting from use of this website, including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, and consequential damages.
REFUND POLICY
Anyone wanting their donation refunded in the first 30 days will e granted.
PRIVACY POLICY
The Church of Reality does not share your personal information with anyone else. Credit Card and personal information is not collected or stored on this web site. All credit card transactions are processed on web sites that are PCI compliant and that information does not go through our servers.
APPLICABLE LAW
By visiting www.churchofreality.org, you agree that the laws of the state of California, Santa Clara County, without regard to principles of conflict of laws, will govern these Conditions of Use and any dispute of any sort that might arise between you and Church of Reality.
CHANGES IN POLICY
Church of Reality reserves the right to modify, alter, delete and update these policies at any time we see fit. Such alterations do not nullify our rights if infringements or breaches occurred under a previous version of these conditions.
Just as a thought experiment what does the word God really mean? Is there any way to make the God concept make sense on a scientific context and is it useful to do so? Or is the whole God concept obsolete and we should just push it aside and never speak of it again? Or maybe there is value in exploring the idea for the purpose of disproving it?
The Church of Reality itself started with a thought experiment. We live in a world with all kinds of different religions that believe a lot of different things. So at best only one religion could be the right religion. If there were the right religion, would that right religion look like? The right religion would be the religion that believed in what was actually real. And thus the Church of Reality came to be. Believing in what's real. What an amazing yet simple concept.
We could do a similar thought experiment on the question of God. It's not just a question of if God exists, but which God exists? What does the word God really mean? Before you determine the existence of something you first have to define it and there are a lot of Gods out there to choose from. Every religion, even every believer, has their own God. So it's a matter of determining which God, if any, is the "Real God" first.
When it comes to gods, size matters. If God isn't the greatest then it's not God
If we look for things that are common in defining God (monotheism Gods), the statement "God is that for which there can be nothing greater." would apply. For example, if you have a God and I have a God and my God is bigger than your God - my God wins! When it comes to gods, size matters. Would you want to worship a god knowing that the church down the road has a greater god? I don't think so.
If the term God has any real meaning in the real world then what we have to do is find the biggest/greatest thing out there, and then determine if it is worthy of the title God. If it is then we have found God. If it isn't then there is no God because the God would be smaller than the biggest thing out there. If God isn't the greatest then it's not God. So with this thought experiment we can determine which is really the one true God or determine if any God exists at all.
In this section I'm going to make the following assumptions about the future. I'm going to assume that humanity is going to progress forward and that some catastrophe isn't going to set us back to the dark ages or we go extinct. I'm going to assume that Moore's Law continues and that at some point general artificial intelligence surpasses humans. Which raises the all important question; "What happens when computers become smarter than we are?"
What happens when computers become smarter than humanity?
Many people in the AI world worry about that. As computing power increases exponentially the computers are becoming smarter while humanity is standing still. Thus if this continues there will come a point, estimated by Ray Kirzwiel, that around 2030 the machines will be smarter than we are. What does that mean when that happens? No one know what will happen, and that's the problem. Not knowing what AI will do once it becomes smarter than we are is the wrong answer. And it's never too early to be concerned about it because this isn't something we should figure out too late. Elon Musk, one of the world sharpest minds in the AI community is so concerned that he invested millions in OpenAI to help figure it out.
"I don't know what will happen when computers are smarter than people.", is the wrong answer.
Those who are concerned about what AI will do refer to this as "The Control Problem". If AI is smarter than us, and not just a little bit smarter but a lot smarter, then we won't be able to simply pull the plug and turn it off. It is more likely that it will be able to pull the plug on us and turn us off. Some people have some ideas about how to contain it in the early stages by keeping it in a secure environment. But if someone makes a mistake and it gets out then we won't have the means to stop it.
Computers are no longer just machines we use and turn off when we are done with them. We are now totally dependent on computer and the internet. They control every aspect of our lives. Telephones are no longer pairs of wires from one place to another. It's streams of data packets. Your car doesn't just have a computer, it has dozens of computers. If you have a desktop computer with a cooling fan, the fan has a computer inside it.
Computers are in your refrigerator, your smartmeter has a computer. your radio has a computer, your TV has several computers, your camera, your credit cards, even your LED light bulbs have computers. Computers are as integrated into humanity as a whole as a bee hive is to bees.
If something destroyed all the computers in the world right now everything would stop. All phone communication would go down. No radio or television. No electricity. No gasoline. No food or water distribution. The internet is now to humanity what our nervous system is to our body. Cut the spinal cord and we die. Humanity wouldn't go extinct if the internet went down, but it would be as bad as a nuclear war. Billions would die within weeks.
Most of what animals know is based on instinct. Instinct is best described as knowledge you are born with. Animals know how to eat and avoid being eaten. Perform necessary tasks to stay alive - and to reproduce. in some species - the parents teach certain behaviors to the young who learn mostly through observation. This learned behavior is mostly centered around how to acquire food and how to avoid becoming food for something else. Some animals have a very small tree of knowledge, but human have a vast tree. We know how to build cars, planes, computers, networks, talk on phones, travel through outer space, and split atoms. In every moment of every day we are thinking in words of a language that we were taught to use to communicate. These words, meanings, and our technology all come from our common store of species knowledge which I am calling the Tree of Knowledge.
Tree of Knowledge depicted
as a Mathematical Fractal
Many of you are familiar with the "Tree of Knowledge" (knowledge of good and evil) in the Garden of Eden from the Bible stories. Well - that's not what I'm talking about here - except for the issue that I am ripping off the name. In the Church of Reality the use of the word "Tree" has nothing to do with a plant. "Tree" in the Church of Reality is more like a software source code tree that allows thousands of programmers to work together on a common software project. The way directories (folders) are organized on a computer is a tree. Trees are mathematical constructs and are often used to organize data and define the relationships between the data. In the Church of Reality, all knowledge is represented as not only the facts but the relationship between the facts. How the facts are stored and organized.
The Tree of Knowledge includes the way knowledge is structured - accessed - distributed - stored - shared - and the methods that allow it to be built up and maintained. In the Church of Reality the Tree of Knowledge is not a mythical plant but a real data structure that binds society together and allows us to have species knowledge and distribute this knowledge through or technological systems. as an individual - I don't need to learn how to build a car. All I need to do is learn how to drive a car. I rely on the knowledge of millions of other individuals - as well as the stored knowledge of dead people - to create cars for me to drive and planes for me to fly in - and computers for me to surf the web.
Even though I am an individual - almost everything in my life involves interacting with the accumulated knowledge of mankind. What I eat comes out of cans and is raised and killed by other people. All my "stuff" - chairs - desk - TV - bed - car - house - roads - phone - electricity - practically everything provided by other people. We are all totally intertwined with each other in a way that can be viewed as if all of the human species were a single organism - and that we are like cells of that organism - because we share knowledge - the Tree of Knowledge.
One definition of a religion is: "System of beliefs and practices concerned with sacred things and or symbols uniting individuals into a single moral community."
Religion is a statement of one's identity and one's belief system and how one evaluates truth. It is about one's morals and ethics and one's community. How one evaluates right and wrong; to identify with a religion is to associate oneself with a common world view shared with others of the same religion. In society, it identifies you in the larger culture of people who care about those sorts of things.
The Church of Reality gives Realists a religious identity.
Religious identity is important in society. Many wars are fought over religious issues - "my God is stronger than your God." People want to know what religion you identify with so they can evaluate your moral code. It gives people an idea of what deities you do or don't believe in. What rituals you practice. To be associated with a religion is to make a statement about who you are, what your values are, what you are committed to, and what you care about.
You don't need to believe in a deity or the supernatural to be a religion. All that is required is to share a common world view and doctrine.
I am a Realist. I believe in Reality the way it really is. I practice Realism. I try to live my life in a way that is as realistic as possible. I make my life choices based on what is really real. I seek to know the truth about the way things really are. I commit to the purpose of furthering knowledge and uncovering the truth. This is who I am and in becoming a member of the Church of Reality I am making a statement to the greater community that I agree with and identify with this world view. That by having the Church of Reality as my religion that is (or will be) commonly known, I can state that I am a Realist and have others understand what that is. That's why it is important to establish reality as a religion and give identity to those who share our common world view the same way that other religions give their world view a public identity.
What is left of you after your body dies? If you reproduced then your genetics live on. But does that represent who you are? Not really. Yes - you might pass on some values to your children and if the values are good values then you continue to contribute to the world after you are gone. If the values you pass on are bad values then the things that are bad about you continue to live on after you are gone. The "guy who inverted the wheel" is still with us because the wheel is a very important part of the Tree of Knowledge. Hitler is still with us because the remnants of his destruction still exist and have make an imprint in the Tree.
Some people are remembered for what they contributed to the Tree. Some are remembered for being destructive. But most people aren't really remembered at all. When you die there is a small circle of people who knew you and remember you. But what happens when the last person who knows you dies? Will there still be anyone around to tell your stories? Will there be people quoting your writings? Will they be using your invention? Or will you merely be forgotten?
What you do counts and what you leave behind and how you are remembered represents the only form of immortality that we know for sure exists. So if you want to be remembered in the Tree you have to accomplish something. You have to take all the Knowledge you inherited from the Tree and give something back. Come up with something new and useful - or - you can help someone else come up with something new and useful and you can know you had a hand in it.
Steven Hawking is one of the worlds greatest physicists. He contributes much to the Tree of Knowledge and he will be remembered for his accomplishments. But the people who dress him in the morning - feed him - and put him to bed at night also have a hand in his accomplishments. So you can contribute to the Tree by supporting those who are making a difference in the world and helping us evolve in the Sacred Direction. When you do that then part of you lives on and the world becomes a better place because you contributed to help make it happen.
The name of the church is a message in itself. In the Church of Reality - the name says it all. We are a church based on believing in everything that is real. Therefore the first goal of the church is to expose most everyone on the planet to our name. It is our goal that everyone has heard the name, "Church of Reality" and at least has some vague idea that it is some kind of church that is based on the idea of believing in everything that is real.
The reason this is important is because if people are aware that the Church of Reality exists, it immediately causes them to ask the sacred question, "What is Real?". It causes them to wonder, "Is my religion real? Do I believe in things that are real? Do I believe in things that are not real? How do my beliefs compare to reality the way it really is?" This raises the importance of reality in the minds of the individuals who make up the world.
From the perspective of the Church of Reality - reality isn't given enough importance in society. Reality is often ignored or deliberately obscured. Most of the people of this planet believe in some form of mythology that has no basis in fact. None of the religious choices include believing in what's real. There is a vacuum out there for knowledge of reality the way it really is. So many people who are being forced or brainwashed into living the lie who are waking up and saying, "Wow! - Reality .... What a Concept!"
The Tree of Knowledge is a very powerful concept. The tree really represents a mathematical tree in that all knowledge is understood by interconnecting it with other knowledge. New words are defined in terms of old words. It is much like the way that software is developed. A word is defined and is passed around in the vocabulary. Once the word becomes common then that word represents a reference to everything that went into the definition of that word. So if I say "democracy" I invoke volumes of thought with a single word. We all know - more or less - what that word means. But someone had to invent that word - create a concept around it - and educate society as to what it means. Thousands of years ago there was no word that represented the concept of democracy. Now we have it. I inherited that word from the Tree of Knowledge. Now it is time for me to give back to the Tree. I have created the name "Tree of Knowledge" so that I can talk about our shared knowledge structure in a single phrase. And - one of the missions of the Church of Reality is to make this phrase - and many others - part of the vocabulary.
With the discovery of the Tree I realized that if we are going to be explorers and explore the reality we live in - that we are going to have to all do that together. We are only partially individual minds. In reality we are all socially interconnected and our whole lives are spent interacting with others, exchanging ideas, and learning. We are all in this together, so the better the support structures are and the better society works - the better we can explore reality together. Exploring reality and growing the Tree of Knowledge is really the same thing.
People have asked me - "What would God have to do to make you believe in him? What would it take to make you a believer?" Well - that's easy. There are a lot of things God could do. All it has to do is show up and perform some miracle that is clearly beyond the ability of any human to fake. For example - God could lift up a mountain - or - it could talk in a big booming voice where everyone on the planet heard it at once. After all - if you are omnipotent and created the universe it seems to me that proving you are God is a trivial matter. So clearly God could do it - it's not doing it - so therefore it either doesn't exist or it is hiding and doesn't want to be found. I have "faith" that if God exists that it is capable of convincing me it is real.
I am Marc Perkel. I exist. I am real. And no one is seriously questioning that. I am accepted as real because I have a phone number and I answer it. I appear in public. I have a web site, and email address, a Social Security Number, a drivers license with my picture on it. I am registered to vote. I appear on Television and Radio and do interviews. I go to lunch with people. I have a checking account. People can see, hear, smell, touch, and for the privileged few, taste me. So if I can be accepted as real then why can't God? Surely God can do everything I can do, can't he? Unless he isn't real or deliberately hiding. And if God is deliberately hiding and we can't find him, who's fault is that?
Some people are saying - "Well, if God actually showed up - no one would believe in him." Speaking for myself and all the Realists I know if God actually did show up - we would all instantly believe in it. God should come out of hiding and give it a try. We are Realist so if God shows up, we are become believers.
Realism is a natural religion which means that you might already be a Realist without knowing it by name. This is different than fiction based religions where the fiction would never occur naturally. For example, if you never heard of Jesus, you would never be a Christian. To be a Christian you have to be told the story of Jesus. And what kind of Christian you become depends on which version of the story you hear.
In contrast, Realism is based on reality. So people who are in touch with reality would come to very similar conclusions. In fact, if independent realists see reality different than the Church of Reality does, it is time to investigate if something is wrong in the church. At least - that applies to church doctrine.
The Church of Reality is also a social institution that is based not just on reality itself, but that is about people and how people relate to reality. Pure reality cares nothing about the human element, but the Church of Reality does. In addition to pure science we are a community. So there is more leeway in how community is implemented. The hard science isn't there to guide us about what social aspects are right and wrong, and what variation there is between different cultures or different kinds of people with different preferences. The way Realists choose to live in San Francisco is likely to be different than the way people choose to live in Mexico City. So different people may find their way to reality naturally but through different paths.
The Church of Reality tries to encompass all the common elements of Realism that everyone would come to naturally, yet be flexible enough culturally to adapt to the human elements of variation between people and cultures. At the same time, the Church of Reality has to be careful not to overstep it's bounds and cross over into areas that invade personal freedom or stifle healthy diversity. We also need to be mindful to stay focused on our Sacred Missions and make sure that reality is never forgotten in the Church of Reality.
As a natural religion we have a lot of people contact us saying, "I'm already a Realist." and that is very true. We are glad to find people who are already Realists and to welcome them to our community. We are also glad when realists say that we are right on track in doing it right, and because of our Sacred Principle of Self Scrutiny, we welcome the criticisms of natural realists who see flaws in our organization and point them out to us. We welcome natural realists to our church.
Every Death is Unique - Every death is individual and unique. Rules and policies around death should be flexible to accommodate the wishes of the dying person and the person's family.
Wisdom should Prevail - In complex situations the individuals involved should take the time to think things through and make a determination based on the circumstances rather than just citing policy. Where there is conflict, efforts should be made to achieve resolution. New situations should be carefully considered in determining the ethics involved and the rules and policies that preserve the rights and liberties of the patient and the family.
The Patient has Choice - The wishes of the dying come first. The Church of Reality supports the right of the patient to choose how and when they are going to die. If the patient wants to be euthanized or wants to be fully awake until their last breath, their choice should be honored.
Suicide and Doctor Assisted Suicide - If a person is terminally ill or is in a hospice program and doctors have determined that they have a short time to live, then the individual has the right to determine when and how their life will end. If they decide to end their life, then that decision should be honored and they should be allowed to have help in terminating their life from their doctors and their family. No one should be pressured into ending their own life.
Who Speaks for the Patient? - If the wishes of the individual are not known and the individual patient cannot express them, then it is up to family members to express what the individual would have wanted. The wishes of the family take precedent over anyone else except for the individual.
Living Wills - Members of the Church of Reality should have living wills and they should also make their wishes known to their friends and family so that their wishes are clear. That way other people won't have to guess as to what you would have wanted.
A person is dead when - they have lost consciousness with no reasonable chance of recovery. Although one might be declared legally dead, later when the body dies, a person's last moment is the last moment that they were conscious. If you are brain dead, you are dead.
Other Religions to Stay Out - Realists have a right to their own religious choices regarding end of life decisions and free from the imposition of beliefs of other religions and cultures. It infringes on our religious freedom when another religion or the government tries to impose their values on us against our will. Our rights to our religious choices are superior to foreign beliefs or laws that infringe on our end of life freedoms.
Unlike other churches, we don't have the advantage of saying that you have to give us 10% of your money because the Bible says so. We can't threaten you with you are going to burn in Hell forever for turning your back on Jesus. We're not going to use shame and guilt on you or the fear that you might piss off God. Unfortunately, I'm stuck with logic and reason. I won't get as rich at this as the big boys. But there are good reasons to donate money, and if any of these reasons appeal to you I would appreciate your help.
The goal of this church is to offer a religion that is based on reality as an alternative to religions based on mythology. Most religions are based on superstition and stories that just aren't true. They all have their holy books and their rules and customs that have little or nothing to do with the real world. Many of these religions, including Christianity, have a goal of world domination. And they want to impose their beliefs on the rest of us whether we like it or not.
I organized this church out of frustration with Christians in particular. I'm rather tired of Christians with their holier-than-thou attitude and their constant attempts to impose their beliefs on me and society in general. Christianity itself is evolving into a hate group as it becomes dominated by various right-wing influences like the Christian Coalition which is becoming a branch of the Moonies. Christians didn't seem so bad years ago when they focused on helping people, charity, humility, and being good, honest and hard working people. But those days are gone and many of these people have evolved into a threat to free-thinking people who want to experience reality the way it really is.
The reason the Church of Reality is important is that it offers an alternative to dogmatic religions and allows people to see reality the way it really is. People seem to have a need for a religious identity, to join, or to herd. There are a growing number of people who reject mythology and want to experiance reality, yet have no organization to identify with that supports the belief in reality as a religious identity. This religion fills a necessary gap and provides a psychological framework and a community of people who are exploring the nature of the universe and want to know the truth.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian is a true saint. Kevorkian has been the primary advocate of doctor assisted suicide and euthanasia to allow people who are terminally ill to avoid a horrible, torturous death by providing life termination services to people who want to die with dignity in a manner and time of their own choosing. Kevorkian believes that humans should be given the same high quality care we give our pets when we put them out of their misery when they are dying. When we do it to animals it is considered the "humane" thing to do, to end suffering, and we do it out of compassion and love for the poor beast. We should have the same love and compassion for humans.
Opposition to Kevorkian comes from a society that fears death and is afraid to face the Reality of Death. We all will die, therefore death is a part of every life. But, as a society, we are afraid of death and therefore afraid of the Reality surrounding death. Fear of Reality is one of the most common barriers to seeing Reality the way it really is. When a person or a society is afraid of Reality, they will fail to see it. We can only see Reality the way it really is through courage. And it takes even more courage when the price of standing up for Reality is facing a murder charge and losing your freedom.
On Sunday, November 22nd 1998, Dr. Jack Kevorkian appeared on the TV show "60 Minutes" and aired a video tape of himself helping a patient, who was in the final stages of ALS, die. ALS is a disease with no cure where the person slowly suffocates by choking to death on their own saliva. By showing the world this tape, Dr. Kevorkian was forcing the issue of Reality on a public that is unwilling to face death and dying. He did this with the expectation that he would be charged with murder. Because of his extraordinary personal sacrifice in the name of bringing Reality into the real world in the face of adversity, Dr. Kevorkian has earned his rightful place as a saint in the Church of Reality.
As the founder of the Church of Reality I declare that I and all of my members have a Constitutional right to smoke pot. This is based not only on the historical event of having formed the church while stoned --- but that smoking pot is essential for coming up with new ideas and further advancing our knowledge of reality and seeing reality the way it truly is. Thus smoking pot is necessary for the practice of our religion itself.
Marijuana -- when used properly -- can significantly enhance your ability to see reality the way it really is. Smoking Pot can improve your ability to think clearly.
An individual in this world is not capable of understanding everything or analyzing everything. Most of what we know is based upon the trust in information and knowledge held by others. Much of that information is inaccurate and has to be reexamined so that we can determine what is and isn't true and to serve society in general by helping to eliminate mythology from the social narrative and replacing it with fact. That is one of our purposes in society and why this church exists. Marijuana is a powerful tool that allows the user to bypass the "herd instinct" and to look at the social narrative from an altered perspective to test it for flaws. Marijuana is not (just) a form of entertainment --- it is a scientific tool. It allow us to use our minds more effectively. We in this church claim a right of access to these kinds of tools.
There is nothing immoral itself about sex, whether within or outside of marriage. This church makes no judgement about sexual conduct between consenting adults. Sex is a way to reproduce and it is a form of healthy entertainment and exercise. It is also an instinctive need that most people have to deal with in order to have a healthy existence. People have the right to choose to have sex with whomever they want to have sex with, and that includes same sex relationships, relationships that involve more than two people, and paid sexual relationships.
The Church of Reality however encourages honesty in relationships and high ethical standards. Relationships involve a high level of trust where people have agreements to be loyal to each other, to reproduce together, and to raise their children together. These commitments are not to be taken lightly and realists are supposed to act ethically and responsibly when it comes to other people and their obligation to raise children. The Church of Reality does not take an adverse position to what other religions call adultery except to the extent that it involves deception. Adultery without deception, where the people involved agree to an open relationship is a matter of individual choice.
Our position on sexuality is to be smart, to be respectful of other people, to take into account the other person's feelings, hopes, and dreams, to be honest and open, to be trustworthy, to be responsible, and of course to be realistic. We realists are to be good sexual citizens and to strive for a world where sexuality is understood and appreciated.
Thanks to this link on Positive Athieism I found several Versions of the Ten Commandments.
Three Versions of
the 10 Commandments
Protestant
Catholic
Hebrew
1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
1. I am the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not have strange gods
before me.
1. I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land
of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.
2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is
in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou
shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy
God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate
me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments.
2. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in
vain.
2. Thou shalt have no other gods before Me. Thou shalt
not make unto thee a graven image, nor any manner of likeness, of any thing
that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in
the water under the earth; Thou shalt not bow down unto them, nor serve
them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of
the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them
that hate Me; And showing mercy unto the thousandth generation of them
that love Me and keep My commandments.
3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in
vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in
vain.
3. Remember thou keep the Sabbath Day.
3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in
vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in
vain.
4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days
shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the
sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou,
nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor
thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in
six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them
is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath
day, and hallowed it.
4. Honor thy Father and thy Mother.
4. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt
thou labour, and do all thy work. But the seventh day is the Sabbath in
honour of the Lord thy God; on it thou shalt not do any work, neither thou,
nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant nor thy maidservant, nor
thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; For in six days
the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them,
and rested on the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day,
and hallowed it.
5. Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be
long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
5. Thou shalt not kill.
5. Honour thy father and thy mother; in order that thy
days may be prolonged upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
6. Thou shalt not kill.
6. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
6. Thou shalt not kill.
7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
7. Thou shalt not steal.
7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
8. Thou shalt not steal.
8. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
8. Thou shalt not steal.
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
9. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife.
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt
not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant,
nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's.
10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's goods.
10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house; thou shalt
not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant,
nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
King James Bible, issued by the American Bible
Society.
Catholic Catechism by Peter Cardinal Gasparri,
"published with Ecclesiastical approval" and bearing the imprimatur
of Patrick Cardinal Hayes, Archbishop, New York. P. J. Kenedy & Sons,
1932.
Besides our registered trademark, the Church of Reality has other trademarks that are non-registered.
The capital letter "R" with a halo over it is our Sacred Symbol that identifies our church. It symbolizes that Reality is Holy to us.
We claim the phrase, "If it's real - we believe in it!"
All words and phrases defined in our Terminology section not used in common language as our trademarks.
All words and phrases defined in our Terminology section used in common language, but not commonly used in the context of religion as our trademarks if used in the context of religion.
This list should not be construed to be all inclusive of everything we might claim as our trademarks. If anyone has any questions about trademark issues they should contact us.
In the 1940's the human race developed nuclear weapons and used them twice against cities killing hundreds of thousands of people. We now can create far stronger nuclear weapons and we have the power to wipe all human life from the face of the Earth. If we are going to survive, we have to decide not to do that. We have to ensure that nuclear destruction never happens. Just because we can do something doesn't mean we should do it.
I often hear people say that primitive cultures were more ecological, that the ancient people knew how to take care of the Earth. But that isn't really accurate. The reality is that they just didn't know how to destroy the Earth like we do - so they didn't have to deal with that decision. In fact - there is a lot of history of primitive cultures who managed to destroy their environment enough to make their region uninhabitable. Now we have far greater technology and we can do things that we couldn't do before. And thus we have greater responsibility.
Actually - we can't destroy the Earth yet, nor can we yet destroy life on Earth. We can just wipe it of what we consider higher life forms. The planet we are on, our speck of dust in the universe will still orbit the sun for about 4 billion more years until it grows into a red giant and then collapses into a white dwarf star. We pride ourselves as being really significant, but we are only significant to us.
If we evolve forward, then we evolve forward. If we wipe ourselves out then we are wiped out. The universe doesn't care what happens to us. The only ones who care are humans - and a huge number of humans don't care either. Ultimately it is up to us realists to care enough to not destroy ourselves. We are the ones who have to figure out a way to make sure that other religions, that don't share our Principle of Positive Evolution, don't get to use the bomb.
The bomb is just one of many challenges we face in the future. The nuclear age was the point where we had the technology for the first time in the history of the world to destroy our own species by a deliberate and willful act. We have the ability to collectively commit suicide for every person on the planet. We now have a choice that we never had before. We have to decide not to do it. The Church of Reality is therefore against nuclear destruction. We choose evolution and reject extinctionism.
We aren't strict on the actual dates when holidays are celebrated. Different people are in different situations and sometimes the holiday occurs at the wrong time. Sometimes, the day the holiday falls on isn't the best day to celebrate it. Sometimes you just have to wait for good weather or a day off. So, feel free to move the dates around to suit your schedule. Celebrating a holiday on the following weekend is often the best choice.
The Church of Reality extends an invitation to Atheists to join our religion. Atheism is a first step, but why not go the rest of the way? Now that you have stopped living the lie, we want to welcome you to the real world.
Realism is taking it to the next level. Realism is about what you do believe in, not about what you don't believe in. Realism is about exploring reality and creating the kind of world that we all want to live in. We make the Sacred Choices to commit ourselves to the Sacred Principles and to dedicate our lives to the Sacred Question: what is real? We are explorers not followers. And this religion creates a religious identity for what you already believe in.
It is our hope that if you became an Atheist because you realized God wasn't real, that you can find a community here to join in your quest in exploring what is real. And in that spirit we extend to you our welcome.
Secular Humanism is a term which has come into use in the last thirty years to describe a world view with the following elements and principles:
A conviction that dogmas, ideologies and traditions, whether religious, political or social, must be weighed and tested by each individual and not simply accepted on faith. (Our Principle of Self Scrutiny)
Commitment to the use of critical reason, factual evidence, and scientific methods of inquiry, rather than faith and mysticism, in seeking solutions to human problems and answers to important human questions. (Same as our commitment to Reality the way it really is.)
A primary concern with fulfillment, growth, and creativity for both the individual and humankind in general. (Our Principles of Wisdom and Bullshit)
A constant search for objective truth, with the understanding that new knowledge and experience constantly alter our imperfect perception of it. (Our commitment to Reality)
A concern for this life and a commitment to making it meaningful through better understanding of ourselves, our history, our intellectual and artistic achievements, and the outlooks of those who differ from us. (Our Principles of Inclusiveness, Preservation of History)
A search for viable individual, social and political principles of ethical conduct, judging them on their ability to enhance human well-being and individual responsibility. (The Principles of Positive Evolution and Responsibility, and the Sacred Moral Question)
A conviction that with reason, an open marketplace of ideas, good will, and tolerance, progress can be made in building a better world for ourselves and our children. (Positive Evolution and many others)
As you can see, much of this is spot on. And it shows that great minds often do think alike. When people put reality first then they often come to the same conclusions.
Having stated how I (and attempting to speak for other Realists) felt about Christians - it's also clear that Realists aren't exactly Christian's favorite people. After all - we are all godless sinners who are condemned to burn in Hell forever. Without a God - we have no morals. That's why we all kill babies, love queers, and are keeping children from praying in school. After all - the bottom line is - if God doesn't control you - Satan does. So - what you're reading right now must be inspired by the Devil.
Some of my closest Christian friends are looking at this Church of Reality and are seeing real potential here. So much potential in fact that they are admitting to wondering if I might in fact actually BE the Anti-Christ. All I can say is - thank you for the compliment and your "faith" in my success - however - we are Realists and we all know that Bill Gates is the Anti-Christ.
And how arrogant of us Realists to think that we need to shepard the poor dumb Christians the poor dumb brainwashed Christians because Realists think they are so "enlightened". Just because Realists put on the Reality title they think that they are so smart - but the reality is that Realists are just as much of a cult as any other religion. Godless sinners who refuse to let Jesus into their heart and accept divine guidance. How can the wisdom of man compare to the wisdom of God?
So - as you can see - we have a big gap to cross. But - we are still stuck here together on this planet so we better try to figure out how to get along. After all - reality isn't going to go away.
Jews believe that world was created in 6 days - with God resting on the 7th day. This occurred about 7000 years ago. Well - wrong! We now know that the universe is about 15 billion years old. But the Jews still believe it anyhow. Now - many Jews will admit that this is probably wrong. In fact - probably most of them. So then - why the obsession with the Sabbath and all the stupid rituals associated with it. Isn't it time to pull that one from the Ten Commandments? Well - can't do that because God gave Moses those commandments .... except that never happened either. Noah and the Ark - never happened. Tower of Babel ... never happened. It's all just stories and none of it ever occurred. It just isn't real.
The Jewish god is modeled after the early oppressive kings. In those times kings had absolute power and if they got in a bad mood - they might have thousands slaughtered. Since God is the supreme king - then he would be the ultimate oppressor. The God of the Bible fits this model. He's a tyrant who loses his temper and slaughters a lot of people when he gets pissed off. And he gets pissed off because he's not worshiped the right way. Think about it - God needs animal sacrifices? The being that created all the universe - all the galaxies - needs people to sacrifice animals to it? hmmmmm ... do you buy that? The God of the Jews is nothing more than a petty tyrant modeled after their petty tyrant kings - and that's according to THEIR beliefs!
So - if the Bible isn't real - then God didn't pick the Jews as the "Chosen People" and Jews are just ordinary people - just like all the rest of us. If you give up the Old Testament - then you have no basis for claiming that God gave you property in the Middle East. It takes away your justification for slaughtering Muslims because it puts you on the same level as they are. Jews of course believe that they are superior to Muslims and are therefore justified in taking their land.
Just as Muslims believe they are God's chosen people and they are justified in slaughtering Jews and taking they land. But the reality is - Muslims and Jews are both pigs and maybe if they spend a few more hundred years slaughtering each other, they might learn that it makes more sense to get along and build on reality and work together to lift each other up. Or - at least there will be less of them to contaminate the knowledge pool of humanity.
God never gave any land to any group of people. Those who slaughter others in the name of God are religious terrorists, nothing more.
The God of the Jews is week and stupid. If God were judged by today's standards - he would be criminally insane and we would execute him as a mass murdered. After all - according to the Bible - God slaughtered all the first born males of Egypt! God mass murders children! What kind of a supreme being is that? Of course - that nothing compared to the Great Flood where God supposedly slaughtered almost everything on the planet. This is a guy who has serious problems. And - God is male - because - well - I guess because God has a penis. What God does with his penis is still a mystery - but we know he has one - otherwise - he wouldn't be a he.
The core of Christian belief is based on the idea that everyone has sinned, and, because you have done something wrong, God will punish you by burning you with fire, or otherwise torturing you forever. If a 5 year-old tells a lie and then dies, God will burn that kid in Hell forever. Out here in the real world, if someone behaved like God supposedly does, that person would be considered severely mentally deranged. We put people who behave like God in jail or mental institutions. In fact, many people are locked up every year for imitating the "Wrath of God".
If Jesus could see what Christianity has evolved into, he'd be spinning in his grave!
Then there's this Jesus guy who's supposed to be "God's Son", born of a virgin, because sex is something evil, and he's here to cut a deal to get you around his dad's wrath. God has an anger problem you see, and so he has to sacrifice his own kid to appease himself so that he doesn't have to torture people, that he created, forever in Hell. So, Jesus has to die on the Cross for your sins, but then he's resurrected, so he's not really dead anymore. And now he's "paid the price" so those who "believe" in him will not fry in Hell like the rest of us.
Even though God created the universe and created billions of us, and he's all powerful and all knowing, he seems to have an identity problem and is so insecure that he needs us to worship him. Kind of like a kid shaking his fist over an ant colony demanding to be worshiped and obeyed, but on a much larger scale. God loves us but needs to punish us, unless we worship him. It's like God is some southern hick child abuser or something. Maybe we should call family services on God for child abuse? Anyhow, Christians believe God has a God sized ego problem and needs us to worship him, or he throws fits like destroying the world and such. God doesn't seem to have much control over his behavior and often is controlled by his own strong emotions.
God doesn't seem to really care much about what you do, but in what you believe in. It's "faith" not "works" that impress God. So, a mass murderer who gets "saved" during his lethal injection will go to Heaven, but the Dalai Lama is going to burn in Hell. So, you can be bad all your life and change at the last minute and get into Heaven. Christians obviously think God is pretty stupid and will fall for something like that. Actually, they don't "think" that because you're not supposed to think. You've got to "have faith" to believe something that stupid. Faith is the belief in something that has no basis in logic or reason.
The bottom line is, Christianity is about the fear of going to Hell. They say it's about "love" too, but hey, people who love you don't torture you in Hell forever, so I'm not buying the "he loves you" crap. And even though God created the universe, he's just not very good with money, and he needs you to give him your cash. God was a lot more out there in ancient times than he is today. God likes to work behind the screens, being the invisible guy in the sky, and letting the churches do his work. He doesn't talk directly, so he needs babbling nut cases to speak for him, (in tongues), with another nut case interpreting it. God is rather impotent these days and his authority seems to be limited to getting even with you after you're dead. So God needs his army of Christian Soldiers to do his work for him.
The alternative theory to Noah and the Ark is that it never
happened. It's just a story that just isn't true. 4000 years ago people
believed the world was flat and that the sky and the clouds went up
forever. They didn't know how high mountains were and how much water it
took to cover them. They thought that a big flood could cover the Earth
and the water would evaporate or run off somewhere. They were wrong.
The alternative theory is that it's just a story and has no more
basis in truth than any other fairy tale. No reasonable person could
believe this is true.
The initial premise for the Church of Reality leads to several logical conclusions. Our church doctrine isn't just a random collection of personal opinions. What we believe in forms a logical structure based on our commitment to the pursuit of reality.
Since we choose to explore reality and we know that one person does not build a Hubble Telescope in the back yard, we know the exploration of reality requires an organized effort by many people. It is logical to conclude that a strong functional society is required in order to achieve our objectives.
We evolve forward through advancing human understanding. We therefore are interested in issues that promote education and the sciences. We encourage freedom of ideas that are not inhibited by intellectual property barriers. We are concerned about fiction-based cults obtaining weapons of mass destruction to fulfill their Armageddon fantasies. Times of peace create a better environment for advancing our understanding of reality than times of war. Individuality and diversity inspire creativity and avoid Intellectual Incest.
The Church of Reality doctrine is the logical extension of our goals and our axioms. It is the set of rules that supports our world view.
Doctrine is first based on our missions. We define what it is that we want to accomplish. It starts with the name of our church. We are the Church of Reality. We believe in what's real. This a nice phrase but how do we live that? Since we don't know all that's real it's logical to conclude that we don't really believe in what's real, but we aspire to discover what is real and we commit to choosing reality over fiction. What we are really doing is making a religious commitment to the disciplines that keep the mind focused on distinguishing reality from fiction. This is the basis for church doctrine relating to personal improvement.
We also have a mission to expand our knowledge of what's real. We identify ourselves as explorers. So it's not just a commitment to what we presently know to be real, but to expand that to grow and evolve. The more reality we discover the more we can build on that to discover even more reality. Thus our doctrines relating to intellectual property, education, individuality, and freedom serve the mission to expand our understanding.
The doctrine is to our religion as what an operating system is to a computer. The doctrine is the collection of principles that make our religion work.
The human race is a collection of individuals who share knowledge. We explore reality as a society and share our knowledge with each other in a vast network of minds. The better society functions the better we can explore reality. Since our mission to explore reality depends on society, we have to build a strong social structure to fulfill our religious goals. Like all other religions we have a stake in what is right and wrong, laws, social justice, fairness, honesty, integrity, accountability and individualism so that we can flourish together and progress as a species. We also have to make sure the electricity stays on so that we can run our computers. Everyone needs to eat, drink clean water, breathe clean air, have medicine and health care, roads and bridges, and all the day-to-day stuff that makes life work. Without society there can be no cooperative exploration of reality. So the Church of Reality doctrine must cover issues of society so that we can better explore reality together.
Since the human mind is an imperfect tool to explore reality with and humans often make mistakes we can not explore reality unless we embrace change. That change being to move towards more accuracy. Stagnation doesn't accomplish advancement. We therefore must not only change but change in a positive direction. Thus the Principle of Positive Evolution is the cornerstone of our sacred principles and forward is our Sacred Direction. We embrace evolution as the process by which we move forward. Our world view is that we can choose to take control of our evolution and choose what we will become. Since our missions involve the exploration of reality we choose to evolve forward making tomorrow better than today and the next generation better than this generation. Our doctrine therefore covers issues relating to the positive evolution of humanity.
The Church of Reality isn't about science. We are about people.
The Church of Reality isn't about science. Science is for scientists. Religion is about people. The Church of Reality isn't just about reality itself. It's about people exploring reality from a human perspective. In addition to the objective facts of the universe we have chosen to accept some purely subjective axioms for purely selfish reasons that have nothing to do with objective reality. These subjective axioms are what makes the Church of Reality a religion and form the basis for our world view. In the cold darkness of space there is no right and wrong. Nothing has value. Nothing is important. Nothing is interesting. Concepts like right and wrong, good and evil, worth, value, importance, these are all totally subjective in nature and are based on our own selfish choices from a human perspective. We choose evolution over extinction. Other religions choose extinction over evolution. Our axioms are the basis for our world view which form the basis for the doctrine of this religion. Even though we choose to explore reality as it really is doesn't mean that reality has chosen us. Science doesn't care about us. We care about science. Our doctrine is a logical extension of our subjective axioms.
Why is there something rather than nothing? Why does anything exist? People of fiction based religions say it proves there must be a creator because something just doesn't come from nothing, But when you ask them, "Well, who created God then?", they respond that God always was and always will be. If you push them on the issue the logic ends there. God works in mysterious ways, we can't comprehend it, and it's a sin to question the Lord. But if something can't come from nothing then an omnipotent creator can't come from nothing either.
The interesting thing is, if you assume that everything must have a creator then nothing would exist. Because the creator would need a creator and that would go on forever. So for some unknown reason, reality just exists. Is there a reason for this? Yes - there is. But what the reason is is something that we just don't know. And thus the creator paradox remains an unexplained mystery.
As with other religions, the Church of Reality will also be affected by the changes in technology. But unlike other religions, evolution is our friend. That's because the Church of Reality has several advantages that other religions don't have. These include:
We are not Stuck in the Past - Most religions are stuck in the past. They rely on a fictional event that happened ages ago and they look backwards in time to a fading memory of a story that becomes less real with the passing of time and the advent of technology. The Church of Reality looks towards the future, the Sacred Direction, We have no fictional cross to bear.
We are Reality Based - Reality based means that we believe in what is real. And if what is real changes, we change with it. What we really mean here is if we believe something that is wrong, and we discover that we were wrong, we change our minds. We adapt to reality because we are committed to that. Fiction based religions facing the reality that their fiction is wrong will either cease to exist, adapt to reality, or find better ways to force their fiction upon their enslaved cult members.
We are the Natural Religion - Our religion is built on the rock of reality, to use a biblical metaphor. When the waves come and wash away the fiction, we will still be here. Reality isn't something that is going to go away, it is like a beacon that always leads us back to the way things really are. As we understand ourselves and the world we live in, we develop a lifestyle and a belief system that is a natural progression of who we are and all the good things we work to become.
In the end there may only be one religion, and that religion will be the Church of Reality. If other religions are going to survive, they are going to have to evolve into something that is more realistic, and many religions are. I remember seeing the Dalai Lama being interviewed on the Larry King Live show on CNN. Larry King, a Jew raised Atheist, was extremely respectful of the Dalai Lama referring to him as "His Holiness" and "The Living Buddha". But the Dalai Lama had evolved and was clearly uncomfortable with accepting supernatural titles even though it had been a tradition for thousands of years. I believe he has become a realist because he played down the "Living Buddha" and said, "I'm just a monk trying to do the best job I can for my people."
This is the kind of evolution that all religions are going to have to go through to survive in the era of the Internet. The Internet brings the tools of information to the people allowing them to extract reality that used to be lost. In this age of reality what better way for a religion to survive than to embrace reality, which is what the Church of Reality is founded to do.
Real is something that actually exists as opposed to things that don't exist. Everything has the property of either being real or being not real. Although we might not know the state of an objec, we do know that everything is either real or not. There is no half real state or something that is outside the scope of reality.
To avoid definition abuse, if someone asked the question, "Is Superman real?", one could say that he exists as a known fictional character, a comic book, and a trademark. Real means not fictional.
The Church of Reality is a Monorealistic religion in that we are all part of the One True Reality which includes everything that actually is real.
Personal Reality is the viewpoint of the individual experiencing reality personally. Personal reality has a local element to it. My reality is my little island of perception and my experiences. Personal reality is reality relative to me. It's reality from my perspective.
From my perspective the universe was created on October 10th 1955 and will cease to exist the moment I die. I am the only person in the universe that is real and everything else is just part of my dream. People only exist if they are in my presence. If you are reading this for the first time and never had any contact with me before then you didn't exist until this very moment. You were instantly created with a false memory of having a life to give you a false sense of continuity, but you only exist to serve me. When you are not in my presence you cease to exist.
Or - maybe it's the other way around. You are the one who really exists and it is I who only exists in your presence and I am the one who has a fake memory of having lived an entire life. You - the reader - are the only real person that exists and reality itself exists solely to serve you. But which one of us is the real one? Or - do we all share some common reality that we all live in? How do we tell?
Although there is some evidence that this is all just my dream, I seem to be stuck here, so I am going to presume that reality is bigger than me.
Well, this can be hard. Is there a real reality or is my brain floating in a jar in a laboratory somewhere and this is all a computer generated illusion? Perhaps the movie "The Matrix" was a personal message to me - a hint that this is all just a dream. I am the one who is creating the Church of Reality and the United States government granted me a trademark on Reality, I own reality, if that isn't a hint that this is all my dream, I don't know what is. There seems to be some evidence that you all don't exist and I am in fact the only person who really is real and this is all my personal illusion.
However, since I can't seem to wake up from this dream of reality it seems that I am at least stuck having to play the game that the rest of you are as real as I am. And there seems to be a lot of evidence that the universe actually existed before October 10th 1955, so I am going to accept that I am but one of billions of real people on the planet who are as real as I am and that the universe is bigger than me. I didn't invent reality, reality invented me.
Since we don't have the resources to test everything ourselves and the vast majority of what we believe in comes from trusting other sources, how do we know who to trust? If we are Realists and committed to reality the way it really is, then who do we trust to get our real information from? Who do Realist have faith in?
I know that several of you readers are cringing at this moment. "How dare you use reality and faith in the same sentence! That is Blasphemy" Brothers and Sisters - I feel your pain.
The quest for truth is an interesting path indeed. You decide to become a Realist. So - what do you do next? Do you go to the Book of Reality, the ultimate authority on everything and start studying? Oh, if only such a book existed it would be so much easier. But unfortunately such a reference book doesn't exist. All we have is a Tree of Knowledge that contains a lot of bullshit that we have to sort through and try to figure out as best we can what is and isn't real. And all we have to work with is our biological brains, a very crude tool indeed, and whatever computers we can build to enhance our brains and store and communicate what we know. It's not much to work with - but it's all we have so we are going to have to do the best we can with what we have.
The question isn't so much a matter of who we trust, but why we trust them. It's about the reputation of the source. Is this information coming from a trusted source? What makes a trusted source trusted?
In the Church of Reality we believe trust has to be earned. To be trusted you have to be trustworthy, or worthy of trust. You get to be trustworthy by being responsible, by being dependable, and by being accountable. Everyone makes mistakes. Even the most trusted sources get it wrong sometimes. But making a mistake doesn't mean that you aren't trustworthy. It just means that you aren't perfect. We in the Church of Reality know that what we know is a small subset of what we can know and that we aren't perfect and a lot of what we know is just plain wrong. However, there is a difference between a trustworthy source getting it wrong and an untrustworthy source getting it wrong. When the trusted source gets it wrong and they find out they are wrong, they fix it. They admit they were wrong and they change to what is right. Often they even investigate the mistake to see why the mistake was made and what they can do to prevent mistakes from happening in the future. They investigate to see if there are any more mistakes that might be related. Untrustworthy sources in contrast maintain the wrong information in spite of the evidence to the contrary.
You become trustworthy by accepting scrutiny and doubt and fixing mistakes when you are wrong. In this way you earn the faith of others.
To be worthy of earned faith you first have to have a commitment to the truth. You have to be committed to reality as it really is. To be trustworthy you have to be a realist. In addition to being committed to reality, you have to be open to doubt and scrutiny. To a person who is trustworthy, doubt and scrutiny are helpful for finding errors and correcting mistakes. Thus when the trusted person gets it wrong, then other people can point out the error so it can be fixed. A person of earned faith would respond, "Oh thank you for finding my mistake, I'll fix it right away!" Doubt and scrutiny are really volunteer help. They are free assistance from a community of people who are interested in your work. A trustworthy person is thankful that other people have shown enough interest to take the time to think about their work and care enough about it that they invest the effort to help correct errors.
Earned faith comes from doubt based faith. In the Church of Reality, our faith is rooted in our doubt process. We come together as a doubt based community to assist each other in our quest for reality by scrutinizing our sources so that they can rise to the level of earned faith.
The purpose of this article is to outline what I consider to be the major arguments in support of a “pure-myth” viewpoint or position concerning the question of the historicity of the biblical figure we know as Jesus, a.k.a. Jesus Christ, Jesus the Christ, or Jesus of Nazareth. A second purpose is to provide the reader with a selected bibliography of books, generally written by highly qualified biblical scholars, which the author has either used as sources of information, and/or has directly quoted from in the preparation of this paper. The author, himself, makes no pretense of being a “biblical scholar,” only an avid reader of their works.
Before I attempt to present at least “summaries” of arguments in support of the pure-myth point of view, (hereafter referred to as a “position”) I think it would be helpful to make clear the various positions which have traditionally been listed as possible. Some scholars have listed three positions. I prefer John Remsberg’s four different options. The positions listed below are from Remsberg’s 1909 book, The Christ, page 327, with slight additions of mine for clarification.
I found this test written by a guy who calls himself Secret Agent Orange who created an extensive web site exposing Alcoholics Anonymous as a cult. Apparently he had such a bad experience with them that he ended up writing an extremely well researched web site about cults and cult behavior. His site is massive and impressive.
One of the most interesting things on his site is his cult test. Of course no test is perfect, but I rate this as damn good and by far the best one I've ever seen. Taking the test and reading the material that each question links to is very educational. Definitely a must read for anyone interested in cults.
Each question is a link to a detailed explanation of each question with a lot of very interesting information about cult behavior. I encourage you, if you really think you might be a cult member, to read each one and really think about it.
Try taking this test as an American citizen to test if America is a cult!
The word "cult" doesn't necessarily mean religious cult. A nation can be a cult. If you are an American citizen, take this test to see if America is a cult. You might find the results interesting. You might also apply it to your job, or political party, or any other group that you are a member of.
As the "guru" of the Church of Reality I have taken the test on behalf of this religion. Member and nonmember alike are encouraged to challenge my answers and make sure I'm being unbiased. Any time the guru takes the cult test it's automatically suspect because I can guarantee that 100% of us gurus will tell you that we are not cult leaders. So it's no surprise that the Church of Reality did well on this test.
One of the first tests to determine if you are in a cult is if the cult will let you take this test. Can you take this test and discuss it with your group? What would happen if you encouraged other members to take this test, would you get in trouble? Do these questions cause you to experience strong emotions? If you can't take this test, even if it's just for laughs, you might be a cult member.
The results don't determine if you are or are not in a cult. It is ultimately to cause the issue to be discussed and thought about. The test itself should be scrutinized. Are there better questions? Did Satan inspire this test to undermine faith? Even if you run a benovolent organization, you might take this to see if your organization is becoming cultish.
So - here it is - have fun!
Click on each question to get the details about what is being asked.
Yes - we have cult speak! We have our own language, we invent new terms and we redefine words. But they aren't thought terminating, but thought inspiring. But that's what the guru is supposed to say
I think the Church of Reality is special, and so are the members. Hooray for us! But the question is if we are "special" as in "Chosen by God" or something. This planet is a spec of dust in the universe. How special is that?
Busted again in some respects. But to us it's a realistic assessment of our own limitations and research into ways to compensate. How to discern reality with an imperfect mind to work with.
So - was I honest in answering these questions? Is the Church of Reality telling the truth? Will we change the answers in the future? If so - why? It will be interesting to see 100 years from now how much of the fundamentals of this religion stay true to the original vision of a natural reality based religion.
Thinking about reality is like an anti-virus program for the mind. It clears out the bad information and replaces it with real information. Thinking about reality purifies the mind. Living "the lie" causes brain damage, not only by training your mind to rely on wrong information, but also by destroying mental processes. When the mind is full of lies you become unhealthy, mentally and physically. Life becomes confusing. Living the lie makes your mind less functional.
Reality heals the mind. It not only clears out the wrong information but it also regenerates your ability to think. When you live the lie you get used to believing in things that you subconsiously know aren't true. You get used to believing lies that other people tell. You get used to believing contradictory information. When you think about reality you learn how to be more discerning. You learn to know when someone is trying to bullshit you. Reality removes the leaches that are sucking your mind dry.
Fictional religion is like a computer virus, infecting your mind and sucking the life out of you like a leach.
A computer virus is a bad program that enters your computer. It changes the operating system and hides, so that you can't find it or remove it. The virus' mission is to make its priority your computer's main mission. It sucks up resources, it takes up memory, and it slows the system down. It saturates your connection to the web, sending out copies of itself in and attempt to convert other computers to the virus. It wants to take over and lets your computer function just enough so that you keep using it. Sometimes when the virus is done it destroys the computer and wipes out all your files.
Traditional Religion is like that. It takes over your mind and it sucks you dry. It takes away who you are and replaces you with a new person who is under its control. It makes you surrender your good judgement and replace it with what they call "faith", which is really a command to, "accept this bullshit as true and you are prohibited from thinking about it or questioning it." In fact - to question it means that you have sinned against God and you will lose eternal paradise for an eternity of Hell and damnation. They steal your very mind, and you live out your life in a world of fiction and lies. When you die, you don't get that eternal life that they promised but we know for a fact that you do get, eternal peace. So why spend your life waiting to die, to live? It won't happen after your gone. Do it now, live life, accomplish something. Let your name live on through possitive achievements. It seems logical then, to live your life in reality, not tip toe through life on fantasies of eternal life after death. It's just not going to happen in a physical sense. Your name and your influence and your genes will only live on in your accomplishments, through the stories, memories and genes of following generations.
Living the lie is slavery. They own you. They control you. They make you believe that you are living for something real but, it's just an illusion. You see this yourself in every other religion other than your own. They way you look at them - you are just like that. Your religion isn't any more real than all of the other religion that you don't believe in. Their religion is bullshit, and your religion is bullshit too.
"How do you know that?", you might ask. How do you know my religion isn't real? We in the Church of Reality believe in reality the way it really is. If your religion is reality then we will all convert to your religion. It's that simple, you prove it - we convert.
If your religion isn't reality, then you're just a slave to the cult mind. They control what you think. Reality gives you the freedom to be real.
When you start thinking about reality it starts to reconstruct your mind. It brings back who you are, and pushes aside who other people tell you that you are supposed to be. It lets you experience the real world the way it really is. It allows you to ask the Sacred Question, what is real? You can explore the universe with your mind. You breath in trillions of gas molecules (air), feel the reality all around you, right here on this spinning planet orbiting a star that is 93 million miles away. Reality is such a wondrous place.
Ask yourself about why you believe in what you believe in. Does your idea of God make any sense, really? Oh - but you're not supposed to think about that. Doubting is the unforgivable sin. Unless you suppress reasoning you will burn. If you test God or if you prove god is real then you lose faith because if you have faith then you don't need proof. But I ask you, "What does God have to hide? Is your God so weak that he can't stand up to scrutiny? Is he irresponsible and not accountable? Does God really have an anger problem? Don't you think that Hell is a little on the psycho side?"
This world we live in, this real world, it's a wondrous place. It is absolutely fascinating. How can you not want to experience it? How can you turn your back on reality? We don't have a lot of time here to exist. How can you waste it? How can you waste your entire limited existence to living a fantasy. A fantasy that isn't even your own. How can you do that?
To me its all about freedom. I can not live as a slave. I am free to think what I want, to say what I want, to be who I am. I can question everything. I am not afraid to face reality because reality is all there really is when it comes down to it. And you know in your heart that I'm right about that. Think about reality. Let it purify your mind. Let it clean your soul. Let it free you. Feel the real world with your mind.
Reality based morality is not so black and white. It takes hard work to figure out what is right and wrong. It would be nice if the world was simple and there was a rule book and the rules were simple and everyone agreed on what the rules are. If only it were so, but it isn't. If you look at "Thou Shalt Not Kill" it seems easy enough to understand on the surface but then you get into the exceptions. For example it is accepted that you can kill in self defense. If someone is coming to kill you and you kill them defending yourself, that's OK. But what about war? Well, if the war is justified and you are defending your good and wholesome society from the evil aggressors, then it's self defense.
But what if the moral justification for the war is questionable? Suppose your country is the aggressor. Suppose your leader lied to get your country into the war and the war is unjust. Are you a murderer if you are in the army of a country that is on the wrong side of moral justification? In the Church of Reality you are. Just because you are a member of a group that does something evil doesn't absolve you from personal responsibility. Our morality is reality based. And there is such thing as right and wrong without an omnipotent rule maker to dictate what that is.
One of the greatest concerns of people of faith is that they think that if there is not God that right and wrong goes away. But it does not. The Basis for Church of Reality Doctrine is that we exist and we want to evolve forward in what we call the Sacred Direction. Our assumption is that we are a society and that we wish to improve ourselves and live happy, healthy, and stable lives. We are all here together on this planet and we want to have peace, be fair, and make progress. To that end we have developed the Sacred Principles which form the basis for which right and wrong are tested. These principles include ideas like Positive Evolution, Exploration, Freedom, Peace, Justice, Inclusiveness, Scrutiny, Humility, Wisdom and Personal Responsibility.
The reality is that life is not simple and life is not black and white. Morality isn't always certain. There are circumstances where something that is generally considered wrong is not wrong depending on the circumstances. A person can steal food to feed their starving family for example. A police officer accidentally makes a mistake and shoots the wrong person. Sometimes things are justifiable under the circumstances. Rules often have exceptions and what is law doesn't cover all circumstances. That is why most nations have juries that have the power to override the law and decided that even though a person broke the letter of the law that they don't feel that justice will be served by applying the law to a particular case.
Two very important sacred principles in the Church of Reality are Scrutiny and Wisdom. Scrutiny involves the Purification of Truth allowing us to correct our mistakes and improve our sense of right and wrong. Wisdom involves putting forth the effort to think things through. What is important in the Church of Reality is accuracy. We want to figure out how to do it right. If we are already doing it right then maybe we can do it even better. We look at what is working and what isn't and try to improve ourselves.
Morality is an important part of the Church of Reality. That's why we ask The Sacred Moral Question so as to make the issue of right and wrong important and that it is considered in processes that involve law and justice. We are not a bunch of selfish heathens who believe that "anything goes" and "do whatever you want, nothing else matters". We believe in a strong society where we all benefit from being part of the community. To be part of society you have rights and freedoms because you respect the rights and freedoms of others.
Does thinking, logic and reason undermine faith? Does questioning what you believe in undermine faith? Or does faith require you to never think about it? Are you prohibited from asking yourself if what you believe in is actually true? What is the relationship between faith and reason? Can faith and logic coexist? Can science and faith coexist? Or is it that in order to have faith that you can't question it? Do you have to just believe it? If you question it - is that a sin?
What is the relationship between faith and reality? Do you have faith because what you have faith in is actually real? Or does reality not play a role? What if you found out that your neighbor's religion was more real than yours? Would you convert, or stick with the religion you have?
If what you believe is real then there's nothing to fear about exploring reality the way it really is.
These are the kinds of questions that we are trying to trick you into thinking about. We want you to start wondering about the relationship between reality and what you believe. If what you believe in is real, there's nothing to worry about, is there. If what you believe is real then thinking about reality will strengthen your beliefs. If what you believe in isn't real however, then thinking about reality can create a conflict. Do you stick with faith, or go with what's real?
Besides, if you believe in God, and if God is real and almighty then surely God isn't afraid of reality is he? Why would a real god not want you to think about reality? If your god is fake however then those who are promoting the fake god wouldn't want you to think about reality. Reality is a threat to all forms of fiction based beliefs. Reality isn't afraid of being questioned.
If what you believe is real, then we want to believe in it too. But if what you believe isn't real, then do you really want to stick with it?
Suppose that all the Bibles in the world were suddenly destroyed and couldn't be reconstructed from memory. Would people still believe in Jesus? Would it be the same as the Bible today? Suppose that all the science books in the world were wiped out and no one remembered science. If people started rediscovering science from scratch would evolution still exist? Would gravity still exist? Would we come to the same conclusions if we started over a second time? Yep - we sure would!
We aren't here to undermine faith. We are here to undermine fictional beliefs. What are fictional beliefs? The simple answer is - every other religion except yours. You would at least admit that there are a lot of religions out there that are dead wrong. So isn't it a good thing if the Church of Reality were to undermine all of them? Yes - of course - that would be a good thing. And - if what you believe is the really real true religion, then I'm sure that we will confirm that and you can go on believing in what you believe in now.
If your God is afraid of reality then how almighty is he?
We believe that false faiths will not stand up to the tests. False faith isn't accountable. False faith will not stand up to the purification of truth. If you bring falsehood out into the light it will disintegrate. But real truth will pass the test of scrutiny and will be strengthened by doubt. We are not afraid of reality, are you?
When we think of evolution we think of "survival of the fittest". We think of male lions fighting to the death to take control of a pride of females, killing the male cubs, and breeding until a stronger male comes along and takes over. Indeed, this is one common mode of evolutionary advancement, but another survival strategy is cooperation. Individuals ban together for the common good pooling their resources for the gathering of food or the common defense. Penguins huddle in great masses to preserve body heat to survive the antarctic winters. Packs of wolves hunt and bring down prey together. Bees live as a super organism in the form of a hive. There are even interspecies alliances that are necessary for survival. If not for the bacteria growing in our stomachs we would all starve to death without the ability to digest our food. The predator relies on the success of the prey for, without prey, there would be nothing for the predator to eat.
The reality of human nature is that we are social animals that evolved to be extremely interdependent in order to survive. We are in fact so interdependent that very few of us could survive out in the wild on our own. We have evolved language to communicate with one another, allowing us to share complex information and form great societies of individuals with highly specialized skills. When you look around at the stuff that you own, how much of it was made by you from raw materials that you found out in the wild in nature, that you fashioned into something without the use of any tools other than tools you made yourself? Probably not one single thing. The words that you speak and that you hear in your mind are words that were invented by other people. Almost all of your personal reality was created by the human community that you live in. Humanity is by nature a social organism.
Our evolution is through our cooperation. We are evolving through the evolution of society. We are progressing by growing the Tree of Knowledge. We receive knowledge from our ancestors and pass it down to our children. Each generation adds (or something takes away from if we ignore reality) something to the Tree of Knowledge so that new generations start with more tools than the previous generation. The rate of our evolution is based on the rate that we give back to the Tree and increase the knowledge of the human race. In the Church of Reality we call this Intellectual Tithing.
If we only take from the Tree of Knowledge and give nothing back, then we fail to evolve. If we damage the Tree with false information, then humanity takes a step backwards towards extinction. But if we give freely of ourselves and share our knowledge, then we as a human race all evolve forward in the Sacred direction towards a better future. Thus giving is necessary to achieve the goals of our individual and collective self interest.
Besides our collective knowledge, being generous and taking care of one another helps us to survive. Everyone has times in their lives where they are sick or injured and need to rely upon others to take care of them until they recover. We do that because it is in our own self-interest to be selfless and generous to others so when we need something, there are people who take care of us. The open hand is for both the giving and the receiving. It isn't about what is fair, it is about what works best.
To that end the Church of Reality realizes the collective nature of humanity and therefore incorporates this fact into our reason for adopting the open hand. Our self interest depends upon our selfless generosity. It is what propels humanity forward.
Intellectual diversity is to the evolution of ideas as genetic diversity is to physical evolution. Even if ideas are wrong, they get people thinking and sometimes lead to a deeper understanding of what we know. Sometimes the new idea is an insight that leads to something else, new. Or sometimes the new idea exposes that we had collectively made a mistake and that we can then correct the collective error. When you look at all the new wonderful inventions we have and look into the people who come up with those inventions, you quickly see that most of these people are weird people. And that isn't a coincidence because free thinkers think "outside the box" which is where new ideas come from.
An observation I also make is that some cultures produce more original and inventive thinking that other cultures. The San Francisco Bay area is a place where more new ideas come from than any other place on the planet. What is it about this area that produces so many inventions and original ideas? What is it that can be learned from the San Francisco Bay area culture?
The Bay Area is home to some of the most individualist people on the planet. Part of the reason for that is that weird people are welcome there. People are highly tolerant of differences between people and allow people to be themselves and freely express their individual weirdness. In many of the large cities in America you see rows of homes and all the homes look alike. In the Bay Area you see rows of homes and they all look different, even though the same builder built all the homes on the same street.
The average person rarely invents anything. All the cool stuff is invented by weird people.
This is an area that embraces the differences between people. People appreciate the fact that they are surrounded by people who do not agree with them. Even if some people don't like what other people are into, they understand that because the weird people have the freedom to be weird, they will be weird. We also know that when we look up the person who invented something really cool, we find that that person has blue hair and a bolt through her nose. Certainly the founder of the Church of Reality, Marc Perkel is a person who loves his individuality and if not for that, this religion wouldn't exist. So it makes sense that the freedom and individuality that went into the origins of this church would be the kind of freedom and individuality we would want to preserve.
Intellectual diversity is central to the Church of Reality because it generates new ideas and new ideas contribute to the Tree of Knowledge leading to Positive Evolution and fulfilling the goal of expanding our understanding of reality the way it really is. That is why we embrace the Principle of Freedom and the Principle of Personal Privacy as Sacred Principles because they are the cornerstone of cultural diversity and lead to a tolerant society where it is OK to be different. A society where it is OK to disagree. A society where people are encouraged to be different, to be their own person, and to think independently. One could even say that if you aren't fighting, you aren't evolving. (There's a statement ripe to be taken out of context.) But when everyone agrees and they all think alike it creates stagnation. Sometimes it takes some turmoil to lead to progress. Our goal as a society is to take diversity and turmoil and disagreement and use it to our advantage as a means of making progress.
WHAT A FRIEND WE HAVE IN DARWIN
(TO THE TUNE OF “WHAT A FRIEND WE HAVE IN JESUS”)
What a friend we have in Darwin,
Some doubts and questions answered,
What a privilege to learn
Everything that man discovered!
Oh what peace we could find,
Needless bickering could end,
If everyone would look at
All the basis Darwin had.
Have we doubts and more questions?
Is there more to discover?
We should only be encouraged;
To let scientists give us answers.
Can we find those scientists
That stand for truth and reality?
Darwin knew the truth was out there;
Darwin knew reality.
Are the religious so blinded,
Can they really not understand?
Precious Darwin still our hope;
The evidence there to see.
Do your friends question your ‘origins’ beliefs?
Open your mind to new thought.
What a friend we have in Darwin!
Please join us in reality.
by Gena Hendrix
The test of salvation is faith. You are required to believe through faith and not through science. But what are you required to have faith in? There are tens of thousands of choices out there to put your faith in, but what if you pick the wrong one? Will you go to Hell if you pick the wrong one? Most definitely you will.
One Sunday afternoon as you are sitting on your porch, a Jehovah's Witness and a member of the Assembly of God walk up to you at the same time to convert you to their religion. Both of them claim to be Bible believing Christians who are out to save your soul so that you might enter the Kingdom of Heaven, to live forever in eternal paradise. However, it is soon apparent that these religions are mutually exclusive, each claiming the other is the road to hell. Perhaps there are 10 different religions represented as other Christians start gathering. Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, Messianic Jews, Baptists, Moonies, and throw in a Muslim, all of them claiming that all the others are false beliefs and that unless you make the correct choice, your soul is forever lost. But the one thing they have in common is that you must believe through faith.
So - how do you choose? How do you decide which one is right?
Obviously you can't start out by using reason because if you use science and logic then you will surely pick the wrong one. If the belief is scientifically provable, then you won't be able to believe in it through faith. Since faith is required, then scientific proof would be prohibited. Suppose there were one true religion, the religion that got it all right (or at least really close). And suppose that it had the salvation by faith clause. Then suppose that science proved that this religion were real. What would that mean?
If the one true religion required faith-based salvation and it were proven to be true scientifically, then that would undermine faith because faith is belief without proof and if you have proo, then faith is excluded. So if science proved the one true religion then everyone who believed in the true religion would all go to hell, because their faith was undermined by scientific verification. This would create a paradox for God - so the only solution must be that God would make sure that the one true religion must never be scientifically provable.
There is some evidence of this because it would explain why God remains hidden from science and totally scientifically undetectable. And it explains why so much of the Bible can't be proved with science because if it could be, it would undermine the faith requirement preventing the believers in the true religion from obtaining salvation through faith. Thus the Bible has to be unscientific so that it can never be scientifically proven and have Bible believers lose faith because of proof and evidence.
So - based on the salvation through faith assumption, we can come to some interesting conclusions.
Science can never prove that God exists.
Science will never prove that the Bible is true.
The true religion can never be proven by science.
So - if this is what we know about the true religion, how then can we find it? Perhaps we can start with a process of elimination? Instead of trying to figure out what it is, let's start with what it isn't. If we know that God cannot be proven through science, all religions that claim the belief in God are scientific and must all be false. The same is true of people who claim to use science to prove the Bible. If they could prove the Bible through science, then they are going to Hell because where there's proof there's no faith. So - that eliminates a huge number of false religions that claim an affiliation with science.
Keeping in mind that, if any element of the one true religion was provable, then that element would lose it's ability to contribute to salvation. It raises the possibility that perhaps the one true religion has no basis in science whatsoever, and the more impossible it is to believe in the more likely it is to be true. What religion would fit that classification?
The Church of Scientology might fit that criteria. They make no scientific claims that God exists, that the Bible is based on science, and the idea that 75 million years ago that Xenu slaughtered the Thetans and that we are possessed by their entrapped souls is so scientifically ridiculous that it fits all the qualifications of salvation through faith. So I suppose if I was forced to choose, I'd have to go with Scientology and hope for the best.
Many people say, "I have my reality and you have yours, and who is to say which one is real? Maybe my reality is real to me and your reality is real to you?" Some say, "If I believe in it – it's real to me." Do we have our own individual realities that are somewhat isolated from objective reality? Does believing in something make it real?
Suppose a Christian who sincerely believes that God can make him fly and a Muslim who believes that God can make him fly both jump off the Golden Gate bridge at the same time. Who will hit the water first? Perhaps we should try it and see. Then, we can get thousands of people praying for both of them and keep repeating the experiment until we find someone who defies the law of gravity. If any of them fly then all us Realists will convert to the religion of the person who God makes fly. If neither flies, then we Realists will bury the faithful and the planet is ours.
The point here is that gravity is real and it doesn't need you to believe in it for it to be real. Gravity doesn't require your faith, it doesn't love you, and it treats everyone equally all the time. When you stop believing in gravity, it doesn't go away.
Believing in something doesn't make it real. If something is real its reality doesn't depend on belief. Therefore, if you believe in something that is real and I don't believe in it then you are right and I am wrong. My belief, even if I believe strongly with all my might doesn't make it real.
The IRS approval process was not trivial and took almost 2 years to complete. It was first submitted in December of 2003 and finally approved in October of 2005. Normally it takes only 90-120 days to get approved but we hit a snag at the normal levels so it was referred to the Washington office where they process the hard to decide cases.
It sat there for a long time waiting to be processed. It's a first in first out system and we just had to wait a year to make it to the top of the pile. The IRS is understaffed and overworked in this division and they have had added duties processing the net 521 political organizations and auditing Muslim charities to see if they are raising money for terrorist organizations.
Although I had some paranoid thoughts, as it turned out what the Church of Reality believed in was never an issue. The sticking point was if we were a church as the IRS defines it. They are not comfortable with web based churches and in their minds a church is a building where people show up weekly and where weddings and funerals are performed and there are youth programs and religious education. Although we hope to have that someday, we aren't there yet. So I changed the application to be a charitable organization which got rid of the church test and it sailed right through.
Throughout the process the IRS was very respectful and very helpful. One of the examiners, Ray Sealy, passed away during the processing of this application. Ray was a good man who served the IRS well for over 30 years. Many of his questions inspired a lot of web pages on this site in order to answer questions raised about what it is we believe in. If not for the IRS application process, much of what has been developed here might not have been. So other than the amount of time it took, I have no complaints with the process. One agent even commented that he thought it was one of the most interesting applications he's reviewed.
This doesn't mean that we aren't a church. It just means that we fit the IRS definition of a charitable organization better than their church definition. For all practical purposes it is the same except we have to file one more form every year if we raise more than $25,000 in a year. So far that's not an issue. And charitable organizations are subject to higher level of scrutiny than churches - but that isn't a problem either because we are totally clean on the money end.
Being tax deductible should help because saving money while giving is an incentive to give more. It also fosters the impression of legitimacy in people's minds that we are somewhat "government certified". On the other hand that scares some people as well. I don't see it as a problem and if it becomes a problem we'll come up with a different plan.
Although, like everyone else, Realists are born into nation states, Realists see themselves as citizens of this planet. We are members of a common species and we are all interconnected through the Tree of Knowledge and are dedicated to the advancement of the human race through the Principle of Positive Evolution. Realists see nation states as temporary subcultures, as artificial man-made divisions that exist for a time, evolve, and eventually disappear. Our loyalties and our religious commitments are to the advancement of humanity and that commitment supercedes any commitments to nation states.
The Church of Reality supports personal choice and personal freedom. We believe in people making their own decisions to as great of an extent as possible. Our position is that anything is permitted unless there is a good reason to not permit it. We believe the individualism and self expression are necessary for positive evolution to occur. A free society allows the individual to experience their own lives in a manner of their choosing and it creates a positive atmosphere for diversity and tolerance which promotes peace and harmony. We are a church of diverse people who have chosen to unite behind reality as our common goal.
Individualism and diversity are good things because if everybody thinks alike and looks alike and acts alike then they are less likely to come up with new innovative and interesting ideas that are necessary to improve ourselves and evolve forward. We don't want Realists to all act the same and thing the same. Although it is often true the "great minds think alike" it is also true that if everyone thinks alike that it stifles creativity.
We also believe in giving the individual as much control of their personal life as possible. We believe that people have the right to make their own lifestyle choices even if it's what most people would consider a bad choice. What is a bad choice for one person might be a good choice for another. Furthermore, even if a decision is a bad choice the individual has a right to make their own mistakes. We can and perhaps should try to talk people out of making bad decisions but ultimately we hold self determination in high regard.
The primary limitation on personal freedom is if one person's freedom significantly imposes on the rights and freedoms of others. A person can't choose to be a cannibal for example because it is unlikely that the person being eaten would choose to want that. Playing loud music might keep the neighbors awake. In cases where the freedom of one person infringes on the freedoms and rights of another then one has to apply wisdom to the situation to figure out the best solution to the problem.
Examples of Church of Reality supported freedoms include:
Abortion - Women in the Church of Reality have the right to control their reproduction. We recognize that often birth control fails and that Abortion becomes a means of birth control of last resort.
Assisted Suicide - Ultimately the individual has the right to choose not to continue to live. This is especially true when a person is nearing the end of natural life and is faced with choosing how they will die. A person has the right to ask for and to receive assistance in termination their own life within the context of wisdom and sane policy to protect society from abuse.
Same Sex Relationships - The Church of Reality considers sex between consenting adults of legal age to be an issue of personal choice.
We as Realists assert that our personal freedom is something that is deeply rooted in the practice and expression of our religion and that freedom is necessary in the pursuit of the understanding of reality.
The Church of Reality opposes forcing children to wear school uniforms against their will and/or against the will of the parents. We feel that clothing is a matter of personal choice and that school uniforms infringe on personal choice. When people are forced to look alike then it tends to create a social dynamic where they are expected to think alike. It also teaches them to accept people who look like them and perhaps to isolate culturally from people who look different. It promotes monoculturalism and intolerance. Children should be allowed to express their individuality.
On the other hand Realists have the freedom to choose to wear uniforms if they want to. There are situations where there are advantages to wearing uniforms. But the important point here is that the choice to wear or not wear uniforms is up to the individual and that we assert a religious right to not be forced to give up our individual choice when it comes to our appearance.
Some drugs are legal and some aren't. A lot depends on where you live and what nation states are asserting jurisdiction in your location. Legal drugs are often as dangerous as illegal drugs. Legal prescription drugs can also lead to bad results even when used properly. It must therefore be the responsibility of the individual to make sure that even if a doctor prescribes drugs that it is in their best interest to take them.
Prescription drugs can be over prescribed. Sometimes antidepressants are given when the real solution is to make better lifestyle decisions. Sometimes the antidepressant is just what you need. Sometimes a person after an accident can become addicted to pain killers and doctors will keep giving them to you instead of treating your addiction. One must be intimately involved in the decision to take drugs.
There are also legal drugs like Cigarettes and Alcohol that are as dangerous or more dangerous than most illegal drugs. The drugs are legal because governments are addicted to drug money revenues from cigarette companies who market their poison with the blessings of the state. In the case of alcohol, this drug can be perfectly safe and healthy when used correctly and totally devastating when used incorrectly.
Mixing drugs with driving vehicles or other dangerous equipment is immoral in the Church of Reality because your actions put other people in danger. Realists should not drive drunk. Nor should a Realist drive a car if they are taking other prescription drugs that warn you not to drive. A Realist should always take the safety of themselves and others into account when taking drugs either legally or illegally.
The Church of Reality recognizes that a person's life begins at live birth. There are other religions that claim, "Life begins at Conception", but we are not one of those religions. It is clear to us, for example, that the two cells that create us are both alive before conception and therefore no new life is actually created at the moment of cellular fusion. After the cells fuse they have to implant onto the uterine wall. At that point the cells might split into two people creating identical twins, or just fail to grow due to some other flaw leading to miscarriage. Current technology allows fertilization to take place outside of a mother's body, so the idea that zygotes are human individuals is something we find ridiculous.
Technology creates fuzzy lines and we recognize that. But if you have to create some sort of hard line, that line would logically be live birth. There are circumstances however where the line can shift somewhat in some circumstances. There are sometimes reasons to consider the rights and needs of the pre born in order to help ensure their survival. There are times when a baby is born in a brain dead state and it is not really fully alive at the time of birth. These special circumstances are issues to be resolved by the medical community along with the mother and family that are involved. In spite of the fuzzy line however, in the Church of Reality a person becomes an individual officially when born alive.
The fish with feet represents evolution. It is a symbol that says that we believe that Darwin was right. It is a recognized symbol of a commitment to scientific principles. Evolution is a central concept in the Church of Reality. Not only do we know that we evolved, but we are still evolving. We embrace our evolution as a way to improve ourselves and advance in our exploration of reality as it really is. Our first principle, The Principle of Positive Evolution is the core principle of our religion.
The following is a list of things the Church of Reality considers to be wrong. Order doesn't mean anything. The list doesn't indicate the degree that it's wrong. Nor does it imply that they are equally wrong or always wrong. It shows the Theist world that we Atheists have a concept of right and wrong as well.
Murder
Rape
Stealing
Genocide
Human and Animal Sacrifice
Canibalism
Torture
Cruelty
Bigotry and Racism
Intolerance
Self Righteousness
Slavery
Starting Wars
Sex with Children
Religious Genital Mutilation
Religious Deception
Deceitfulness
Dishonesty
Cheating
Greed
Selfishness
Drug Addiction
Blind Faith
Abduction
Terrorism
Polluting the Environment
Driving Slow in the Fast Lanes
Obviously not all these "sins" are equal. Smoking cigarettes isn't as bad as human sacrifice but you still don't want to start smoking and you want to quit if you can. The issues surrounding right and wrong are important and that's why we ask the Sacred Moral Question so that we can be as sure as possible that we are doing the right things.
Humanity is evolving through two kinds of evolution. We are evolving physically through the Tree of Life and we are evolving mentally through the Tree of Knowledge. The human race is unique in that we have evolved the ability to share vast amounts of information so that information that is discovered by one individual can be passed on to others. Other species of life have only very limited abilities to communicate. They can squeal to alert others to danger. Bees do complex dances to communicate the location of food to other bees. But we are the only species that can surf the web and blog and we only evolved the ability to surf the web and to blog in the last 20 years. The Internet, which we call the Sacred Network was a huge advance in human evolution.
Now that the human race has evolved the Tree of Knowledge, our evolution has accelerated. We have changed the face of this planet through our ability to share information. Humans can now fly and travel to the Moon. We have now sent a machine (Voyager 1) outside our solar system. We can peer using our space telescopes back to the beginning of space and time. We have split the atom turning matter into energy. We are now beginning to use the Tree of Knowledge to control the Tree of Life. We can make genetic material and we will soon be able to manufacture custom life forms from scratch. We have the power to determine our own future and we need the wisdom to make good choices so that we decide to become something good that we can look back at knowing that we made good choices.
Some religions claim to be reality based, but are they really? How do we know if their claim is true? How do we know if the Church of Reality is really reality based or is just using the name as a marketing tool to find suckers to integrate into a cult of mindless zombies who are brainwashed into believing they are part of a great army of Realists? What are the objective tests that we can use to determine if a religion is truly reality based or not?
Of course since this test is written by the Church of Reality one has to assume that we are going to pass our own test. So perhaps these tests should be modified by and outside person so as to make it more objective and raise the bar on us. We are assumed to be biased. But - having said that we are still going to try. Here are some tests.
Advocating for Reality - A reality based religion will advocate for reality by name. Reality will be part of their doctrine and part of their practice. Reality will be a dominate factor in their religion. They will encourage their members to follow reality above all else and that reality take precedent over their current doctrine. If a religion refuses to advocate for reality, it isn't a reality based religion.
If you are a reality based religion then your shouldn't be afraid to put "Choose Reality" on your web site.
A reality based religion shouldn't have any problem putting this web sticker on the front of their web site. This is an interesting test because religions who are not reality based are threatened by the promotion of reality. A non reality religion is diminished by the message of reality, where a reality based religion is enhanced by advocating reality. Reality based religions embrace reality, while others fear it.
Question Reality - Faith based religions require you to believe without questioning doctrine. You are expected to suppress our reason and substitute an emotional process to support your beliefs. In the Church of Reality we believe that if God exists that God would not be afraid of reality and that God is strong enough to stand up to scrutiny and doubt. Realists believe that if God exists that he is a strong and mighty God and that reason won't drive him away. We therefore consider it a test of a religion's commitment to reality that they are not afraid of their beliefs being questioned and scrutinized. In the Church of Reality we have the Principle of Scrutiny and Doubt as one of our Sacred Principles. We assert that a reality based religion is required to embrace scrutiny.
The bottom line is - if your religion is afraid of reality, or refuses to advocate reality, can't accept scrutiny, prohibits questioning, suppresses reason and logic, and asks you to believe stuff that is just plain stupid, it's not a reality based religion. Remember - all cults claim to be real too.
It isn't a coincidence that so many of the Sacred Principles are related to honesty because we are the Church of Reality and that's what we do. If something is real that means that it is truly and honestly real. So if we stay true to our purpose, we will remain honest. And if we lose our honesty, then we lose our reality.
Since the Church of Reality is an evolving religion the number of sacred principles and the order of the sacred principles are subject to change. Sacred Principles should be referenced by name and not by number except for the Principle of Positive Evolution which is also known as the First Principle. The order of the other principles carry no meaning and are subject to reorganization without notice. The Sacred Principles are to be understood and not memorized.
Edicts relating to church business are considered to be administrative decisions of the Church. Edicts relating to opinion on issues are to be considered where the Church stands on those issues. Edicts are the voice of the Church and do not necessarily represent the personal views of all members of the Church. Our religion strongly supports Individualism and members are required to think things through for themselves and interpret reality using their own Wisdom. The Church however does not issue edicts lightly and members should give great weight to Church edicts. Likewise, if a Church member needs confirmation of a personal decision that invokes a religious right they can ask the Church for an edict to support their decision adding the support of the Church to their situation.
For example. The Church of Reality requires individual Realists to determine if a war is just or not before participating in a military conflict. The Church of Reality from time to time might issue an edict to declare a war just or unjust. If the Church of Reality declares a war to be unjust then that adds the power of Church authority to the decision of the individual to refuse to serve in the military. If the Church issues an edict that a war is just then that provides guidance to members in their decision to participate or not. But it is ultimately up to the individual to decide. The Church of Reality supports members who decide that all war is wrong. Not all Realists agree on this issue and a person's decision to live their life without being required to kill other people falls within the Principle of Freedom. If the Church issues no edict regarding a war then nothing should be inferred from that. It doesn't mean that the Church is neutral or that the Church has affirmatively decided not to act. It could mean that we have yet to decide the issue. If we don't speak, it doesn't mean that we have decided to not speak.
Edicts of Doctrine are declarations of Church law for the purpose of resolving issues brought before the Church. If a member is asserting a right to a religious freedom to a governmental body and it is unclear if the right is supported in Church of Reality doctrine, the Church might issue an edict to declare how church doctrine relates to the challenged issue.
Have you ever wondered if the world really exists? Maybe this is all one big computer generated illusion and our brains are in a lab somewhere and all of this is an illusion, like in the movie The Matrix. If all of reality is really fiction, then having a fictional creator make sense. The Flying Spaghetti Monster represents the creator of the fiction we live in. We created him so that he can create us. Reality creating fiction, fiction creating reality. This is the theory of circular creationism. The creator creates the creation, which in turn creates the creator. If you think about it, most of the religions of the world already use this model of creationism.
In the beginning was the Big Bang, the moment when time and space were created. The universe expands outward, hits it's limit, and then begins to collapse. As the universe collapses time goes backwards. That is what is happening now, but we aren't aware of it because when time goes backwards we remember the future instead of the past so it all seems the same. But once we hit the Big Crunch (the end of times, which is really also the beginning of times) the universe inverts and becomes the fictional universe of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and the cycle continues forever. He creates us and we create him.
We can tell we are getting near the time of the Big Crunch because fictional deities are becoming more and more real as more people turn away from reality in preparation for the great moment of reality inversion. The more we see people believe in the absurd, the closer we are to the Big Crunch. In the end time truth will become fiction and fiction will become truth. Morons will be hailed as geniuses. It will become patriotic to give up your freedom. Actors will be elected to public office in order to assume their roles in the new world order.
Reality too is a dichotomy. There is reality and anti-reality known as fiction. We create fiction and fiction creates us. We are the creators of the fictional Flying Spaghetti Monster. We create the fictional world. In this world lives everything that we imagine. It is a world where Gods and Comic Book super heroes live in harmony. This universe includes Spiderman, Superman, Zeus, Osirus, Thor, Dr. Strange, Jesus, Apollo, Vishnu, Allah, God, the Boggie Man, Satan, Spock, and Captain Kirk. Alice in Wonderland is really a prophesy about the true makeup of our dual universes.
In this reality we make up fiction. We control the fictional universe with our books and stories. Likewise the fictional universe makes up our reality and controls our universe with their books and stories. Their books include the Bible and the Koran and no one doubts the control they have in our reality.
We know that fiction can not exist without reality. But reality can not exist without fiction. Because after all, does the word real have any meaning if we don't have something unreal to compare it to? And if we are comparing what is real to what is not real, doesn't that mean that what is not real exists too? Therefore, the Flying Spaghetti Monster must be real. Circular creationism is supported by circular logic and therefore proves itself. Intelligent Design is therefore true!
See - I wrote this without the use of drugs. I was touched by his noodly appendage. Say No to drugs!
One thing we need to keep in mind in this decision is that we are comparing execution to life imprisonment and not releasing murderers who should be executed back on the street. The choices here relate to comparing the justice of execution to other ways of dealing with the problem of how to deal with people who wrongly take the life of another. The issue is even if death were more justified than life in prison, is the additional justification worth the cost? That is what we need to think about when deciding the merits of this issue.
You say you believe in real reality. How do you know your view of reality is real?
We don't. Our claim to believe in reality the way it really is, actually is a goal. As we all know, no one knows everything about reality. So the Church of Reality is really a religious commitment to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. What we do is make reality important in our personal lives and to raise the importance of reality in society.
An important concept is that there is no "our reality" that the Church of Reality believes in that is either right or wrong. Our church doesn't usually declare what is real and what isn't. Our religion is a commitment to pursue reality wherever that leads us. So there is no "our reality" to get wrong. We are more properly judged in respect to whether our pursuit of objective reality is genuine. So - if we took a position on something and you can show us we are wrong, we are committed to changing our minds.
But what if the Church of Reality is wrong? What do you do then?
If we realize that we are wrong, we fix it. Our doctrine, which we call the Kernel, is always under development. We assume that the Kernel can always be improved. The Church of Reality has a dynamic doctrine rather than a static doctrine. We are a religion committed to change, but not just any change. We commit to Positive Evolution. We are evolving forward in the Sacred Direction. Making mistakes is just part of the evolutionary process. What is different about us as compared to most religions is that we fix our mistakes.
Isn't Reality just science? Why do you want to stain science by lowering it to the level of a religion?
In pure science the universe is just stars exploding and rocks in space bumping into each other. In pure science whatever happens - happens. Nothing has any value. It doesn't matter to science if the human race thrives or becomes extinct. The Church of Reality has chosen a world view that our survival does matter and that we are to thrive and to become aware and to understand our reality. We have chosen through the Sacred Choices to move forward in a positive direction towards a better tomorrow. These choices are arbitrary choices and are therefore a religious choice. Other religions envision the future in destruction and that humanity is at its end. Our world view is that we are at the beginning of the Sacred Journey towards a tomorrow that is wondrous, and we have made a religious commitment to dedicate our lives to that goal.
What about personal reality? Isn't everyone's reality different?
There's one's own personal perception of reality, and there is one's personal life and thoughts. But then there's the "real world" or objective reality that we all live in and share. If reality was all personal, then perhaps the universe was created on October 10, 1955 - the day I was born - and the universe will end the day I die. Maybe the world is just an illusion and that you all don't really exist? Maybe my brain is in a jar in a laboratory somewhere and this all is just a computer generated illusion - that some day I'm going to wake up and be back home on my own planet and this all will be nothing more than a dream.
One illustration I like to make about personal reality and objective reality is this: suppose that a Buddhist who has a personal relationship with God and a Christian who has a personal relationship with God both jump off the Golden Gate Bridge at the same time, both believing that their God can make them fly. Which one will hit the water first? (In a vacuum)
Becoming a Realist involves giving up some of your personal beliefs and personal realities because real reality is different and the Church of Reality is about the way it really is - not what you want to believe in.
When attending a Unitarian Church it is important to be respectful of the members of the Unitarian community, remembering that we are individuals forming a community, just like everyone else. Unitarians like to exchange ideas about their widely variant philosophies, and we are there not just to talk about reality but also to learn about reality. We're not there to try to convert anyone to Realism.
Unitarians are activists and care deeply about equality and social justice. They protest together and sometimes their bonds are based on being arrested together as a community. Nothing like spending the night in jail with someone to really get to know them. I think I would be proud to be arrested with a Unitarian.
We in the Church of Reality are new at this. Unitarians have centuries of experience and have made great contributions to the Tree of Knowledge. Much of what we know today and value in the Church of Reality came from our Unitarian ancestors. So it is totally acceptable to have both the Unitarian and the Realist identities at the same time.
One of the best ways to promote the Church of Reality web site is to link to us. If you have a web site, then put a link to this site on your front page. Feel free to grab any of our graphics to use for the link. Tell your readers why you like the Church of Reality so that they will want to visit this web site. The more people find out about it, the more people will link to it. Every link to this web site makes the world a better place to live because it makes reality more important.
If you don't have a web site then tell your friends about it. If you know people who have web sites, ask them if they would link to us. Links are the Internet equivalent of word of mouth, but it speaks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
If you participate in online discussions you can promote the Church of Reality by commenting on blogs that have comment sections and putting links in the comments. When linking for comment on blogs, be respectful and try to relate it to the topic being discussed. Don't go out and just post unrelated spam about the Church of Reality. Your comments should be relevant to the discussion.
A lot of web sites have discussion forums, like our discussion forum, where people talk about issues. There are a lot of good forums that relate to religion, reality, Atheism, Humanism, and the impact of religion as it relates to politics. These are good places to discuss the Church of Reality. Remember that most people have never heard about this religion before, so try to explain things in a way that assumes that the information is understandable. And, in your comments, try to add links back to this web site so that people can discover all the information that we have posted here.
We are not a church that tends to hit you up for money donations. We are trying, as much as possible, to grow this religion without being dependent on money. We are modeled after open source software projects that are used by tens of millions of people but are not money driven. These online software communities are spread by word of mouth on the web. The Church of Reality is like open source software for the human race and we want to form a community of developers that help build upon this religion to make it a religion that is of the people. No central church with fat TV preachers living in mansions. That's not the way we are going to be.
So in order to grow we aren't asking you for your money, but we do need you to put in some time and effort to spread the word. We have a concept called Intellectual Tithing which means that you contribute with your brain. We would rather have your thoughts and we want you to share our enthusiasm, make this your religion, and proclaim to the world that reality is the true king!
The Church of Reality has two separate elements. We are an institution and we are individuals. As an institution we are politically neutral. As individuals we are extremely active. Our Sacred Principle of Activism inspires us to get involved and change the world. In the Church of Reality it is a sin to fail to vote in an election. We don't tell you who to vote for, but our governments have a huge impact on our ability to pursue the understanding of reality and we therefore need to make sure that we elect people who are compatible with our religious goals and vote on issues that support our Principle of Positive Evolution.
Politics is in the realm of individual choice. We are a church of individuals who are strongly individualistic. We are not here to tell you who to vote for. Realists, however, are politically aware people with a keen interest in society and the functioning of government. We are people who participate in the structure of society. We are people who want to make the world a better place, care passionately about causes, social justice, holding leaders accountable, ethical government, peace, and education, to name a few. We are a religion of thinkers. We use reason and wisdom to think things through and come up with the best solution.
We are people who honor those of great political courage. We are people who are not only willing to fight for what's right, but to have the honesty and wisdom to figure out what is right before we fight. We are people who are dedicated to not being fooled by Bullshit and becoming political suckers, because it creates a false sense of self importance. We are willing to go out and protest and, if necessary, to get arrested for causes that are just. We are a culture that speaks out. We believe that to remain silent and allow injustice to occur may be the same as participating in the injustice itself.
Our simplistic definition of our church is that "we believe in everything that is real." But that really doesn't define us. A more accurate definition is that we are here to change society for the better. We are here to transform our world into a better place to live. We are here to transform society into a smarter society. We are here to transform ourselves into better and wiser people. Our goal is the understanding of reality as it really is. But our method for achieving that goal is through Positive Evolution. Positive Evolution isn't an opinion that humanity is evolving forward. Positive Evolution is a commitment we make to do our best to ensure that humanity evolves forward. And we aren't going to evolve forward unless we as individuals are willing to work to affect the nation states that we live in. So even though the Church of Reality is a religion and politically neutral, as individuals we are very politically active.
On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
Church law and religious rights are set fourth here in the Kernel which is our Church Doctrine. This doctrine might include external references like Humanism or United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. This forms the documentation of our belief system which is a growing and evolving document. The First One and the Council of Realists have the power and authority to interpret church law and doctrine. Issues not covered specifically, or where there is a controversy over the meaning of church doctrine, may be settled by an edict of the First One.
In a United States court case, Russo v. Central School District No. 1, the court made this profound statement that reflects precisely the position of the Church of Reality.
"Patriotism that is forced is a false patriotism just as loyalty that is coerced is the very antithesis of loyalty. We ought not impugn the loyalty of a citizen any more than we ought necessarily to praise the loyalty of a citizen who without conviction or meaning, and with mental reservation, recites the pledge by rote each morning. Surely patriotism and loyalty go deeper than that."
For a Realist to recite state sponsored pledges is an insult to the very freedoms the State supposedly stands for.
A Realist is a Realist because they can not live the lie. State sponsored acts of patriotism are in direct conflict with our Sacred Principle of Honesty. To require a Realist to recite a pledge or to salute a flag is to deny a Realist his religious right to pursue reality as it really is. For a Realist, even a Realist who is truly patriotic, the act of reciting a state sponsored pledge diminishes the patriotic experience because it is not an act of the individual praising the State, but the State praising itself. When the State requires affirmations by its citizens it is an implied admission that the conduct of the State is unworthy of praise on its own merits. So even a Realist who loves the State and is totally loyal to the State is harmed by state sponsored affirmations of loyalty.
What we are up against in fiction based religions is that using the name of God they can promise you anything. They have everlasting bliss in Heaven, 70 virgins, omnipotent intervention, an inflated sense of self worth, a loving community, ego treats, a sense of some grand purpose, and of course, burning in Hell forever for those who fail to believe. One thing that religions understand is that they start brainwashing their children early because they understand that the earlier they establish mental patterns the harder it is to change them.
Like the tricks that the tobacco industry uses to make cigarettes as addictive as possible, religions have evolved techniques to make their religion as addictive as possible.
Conversion to fiction based religions is easier than reality based religions. If a person is in an emotional crisis and someone comes along offering them a solution to their problems, they might just go for it. After all, it's so easy. All you have to do is believe and an omnipotent protector is going to intervene on your behalf and take care of you forever. What a deal! People want the quick fix. Reality often isn't a pretty picture. If someone is in a real bind then they have to do hard work to get out of it.
If they have lost someone they want to believe that they will be reunited with their lost loved one in some afterlife. We want to believe that when we die that we are going to go to a better place, or at least something other than ceasing to exist. We want to believe that our total existence is more than 75 years and then we are gone. And it's really easy for religions to create false hope because there aren't any dead people out there who have come back from the afterlife to talk about it. If the dead could talk a lot of religions would be in big trouble.
Marc Perkel, the First One of the Church of Reality is often heard (but not often enough) giving radio interviews. Interviews are good because it gives other people the chance to ask the questions they want and give us insight into what people are thinking about reality based religion.
In December of 2004 Marc Perkel was interviewed on Air America Radio. The interview is about 20 minutes long and Mike Malloy did a fine job of making Reality interesting.
Early in 2005 Reggie Findley the Infidel Guy interviewed me in a call in format in an hour long show. Reggie is a really good interviewer and interviews many people on religious topics.
Soon after I was on the Infidel Guy I was invited by Joe Vecchio to be on the Cup O' Joe Show. This is a longer interview and it is also a lot about my history and other things I've been into besides just the Church of Reality. Maybe more about me than you really want to know. The original show is an hour long and if you have the time it's worth listening to. But I did cut it down to a 40 minute version that is a lot smaller to download and is just that part where I talk.
I like radio better than TV because on the radio you can hear me say, "you know" every 3 seconds. But on TV you can see me say it over and over again as well. Last summer I was on thos wonderful TV show on cable access TV in Mountian View California called "What's up with That?", hosted by Firedup Productions. This is a big file (140 megs) and is in Quicktime format so it's going to take some time to download to watch. And the audio levels in the first few minutes are kind of clipped but it does get better if you stick with it. Andrew Willyoung did a brilliant job of interviewing me. And it's a lot of fun so Here it is.
In October of 2005 John Sugg who does interviews on a non profit radio station in Atlanta did this 23 minute interview about the Church of Reality and politics. It also convers letters to the editor that I write.
Here's another radio interview on a syndicated Christian talk show called The Way of the Masters. The Interveiw is 50 minutes long and is a very interesting interview by a hard core Christial fundamentalist Todd Friel who is very sharp and asks a lot of good questions.
On March 5, 2006 I got a call from KXRA 540 Radio who has a show called The Naked Ape. The interview is 30 minutes long and covers a variety of subjects including the recient edict about the South Dakota Abortion Law.
Many people are subjected to ownership by their religions. "You do not own yourself, you belong to GAWD!" they tell you. You have to surrender yourself to Jesus. You have to give up control of yourself to your master, priest, mullah, teacher, group will, or whatever wants to dominate you. That is one of the big differences between the Church of Reality and many other religions. We believe in self ownership and many of them believe in religious/deity ownership and that they are in control of what you can do, what you are required to believe, even what you are allowed or not allowed to think about. You are their slave. You may be a slave by choice, but a person who chooses to be subjugated is still subjugated. Many people who believe that they have chosen that path freely believe it because they are told that they have to believe that they chose that path freely.
In order to explore reality the way it really is, we need people to be explorers, not followers. Followers don't contribute anything to the exploration of reality. Yes, learning is a fine thing and people do need some learning in order to get started exploring. but the Church of Reality expects that at some point that you will begin Intellectual Tithing, which is to contributes something to the Tree of Knowledge. In other words, you figure something out and tell us something that we didn't know. You contribute something exciting that we can build upon. The Church of Reality isn't here to tell you what to believe. We want you to help us explore reality together. In order to do that, you have to own yourself, to be an individual, to think for yourself, to keep your mind sharp, and to be imaginative and innovative. We need you to be you, not to be us.
We don't have a God to tell us what to do. So we have to do the hard work and figure it out for ourselves.
Followers don't come up with new ideas. That's why religions that own you are static religions that don't come up with new and better ideas and don't fix the mistakes of their past. They tell you what to think. You aren't allowed to come up with your own better ideas and help the religion evolve. The Church of Reality is a dynamic religion. We are an evolving religion. We are a religion that is constantly under development. The more minds that are working on it, the better we are most likely to become. We don't have an omnipotent authority figure to tell us what to do through dead prophets who wrote ancient holy books.
We are realists and we have to do the hard work. We have to fill in for the missing invisible cloud being that remains hidden and silent. The Church of Reality requires that you think for yourself. You can't do that if someone else is doing your thinking for you. You have to own yourself, take control and make your beliefs your own personal beliefs because you thought about it and you concluded that you are in fact correct. If you happen to agree with other Realists, then great minds think alike. If you happen to disagree, then we figure out who has it right.
I was born in 1955 of two weakly Jewish parents. At the age of five I was forced to endure religious training, something I hated. I already resented having to go to public school, and now they wanted to take away the weekends too. So as a Jew I learned about the Old Testament and this funny language called Hebrew. Before that I had been exposed to the idea of God, but not enough to give it a lot of thought.
But now I was supposed to learn this stuff instead of spending time with my grandmother who was teaching me mathematics which I really loved. I remember these stories about animal sacrifices and God calling on people to sacrifice their children, but calling it off at the last minute. I saw people worshiping and praying. I was told that God got angry, destroyed the world with a great flood, then promised never to do that again. Being a logical person this guy God seemed to have some real problems with his emotions.
But then they got to the Exodus story and it came to the point where God killed the first born son of all the Egyptians. Being a first born son myself this was getting personal. That this God who was all wise and all knowing would kill someone like me because of my parents' behavior? No! I'm not buying this story. I rebelled. I decided this was all stupid and that I wasn't going to participate. I started skipping out and pocketing the 15 cents of charity money that I was given to throw into the till and going up on the hills to play with things that really interested me. Things like fire.
Fortunately my parents rarely showed up at Temple themselves so they had no idea that I wasn't going. Eventually word would get back to them and there would be punishment, but I endured it and when forced to attend I made sure they regretted every moment of it. So eventually they figured out that if they didn't report to my parents that I wasn't there, they didn't have to endure my presence when I was forced to come. Jews fortunately don't take their religion as seriously as Christians so if I missed out it wasn't as big of a deal.
I also lived a block away from St. Michael's, a large catholic church and school and several of the kids in the neighborhood we Catholic and had to attend both church and school there. The Catholic religion was a lot scarier than being Jewish because it was clear that had I been Catholic I wouldn't have been able to get away with the things I got away with as a Jew. So - even though I thought it was bullshit, I stuck with the Jewish identity because it wasn't nearly as bad as being Catholic or Christian which other kids were and I saw as something separate from being Catholic at the time.
One thing the Catholics had that the Jews didn't was that their church was open most all the time and anyone could wander in to this huge space that was mostly empty. And they had all these prayer candles there that you were supposed to drop in a dime and light one. So I'd go in and light them all sometimes and it became a source for matches which allowed me to start campfires and find old lead pipes to melt down and pour into molds for fishing sinkers. But while inside the catholic church I noticed the big Jesus hanging on the cross. As a Jew I identified this as "Idol Worship". They were worshiping a stone image. So I thought of Catholics as the primitive heathens who didn't realize that God wasn't a graven image, but the invisible cloud being. Later in school I would not say the pledge to the flag for the same reason. It was idol worship.
Although I wasn't as fortunate as people who are raised as Atheists I managed to resist being forced to become a theist. I never really bought into the God thing although if you had asked me when I was under 12 if I believed in God I would have hesitantly said yes, I never really got to the point where I actually owned the belief. It was in the world of adult superstition and adults were not to be trusted, which is another story in itself.
Sometimes it's easy to get discouraged in the face of illusion but there's one thing to always remember. Reality is here to stay. Reality isn't going away. Reality always was and always will be. Reality was there at the beginning of time and will be there till the end of time. And no matter how many people believe in things that aren't true, reality stays the same.
It is always there and you can always turn to the real world, embrace the truth, and we as a society can make better choices. Reality can change your life today. You can embrace it, explore it, own it. Thinking about reality is the joy of being real in the sacred moment. You can become one with the real world. Let reality into your soul and experience the knowledge that everything in the world is real.
Reality gives us strength. it gives us courage. Reality gives us the true freedom to make the most out of who we are and what we will become. We owe our very existence to reality. If we reject reality, we have nothing left.
We are surrounded by all this wonderful knowledge. Knowledge that we can grow, that we can share, that we can build our future with. We can use reality to build a better tomorrow, a world that we can be proud of and we come together as one people, as one planet, to live in peace and let reality take humanity to its full potential. We have the power to choose our destiny. To decide what we will become. Let us therefore make the best choice possible and let reality guide our decisions in everything we do. We can become the dream.
This is the Gospel of Reality. Go forth and proclaim it!
It's important to think about the future. This is especially true of teens because your teen years are very important. This is the time when your core personality is forming and what you envision as a teen has a huge influence on who and what you will become for the rest of your life. Many teens end up being the result of their experiences as a teen. That's why it's important for you to own yourself and take control of who you are and what you want to become. After all, it's your life and if you don't take control of it then you won't be able to fully experience your potential.
So - it's good to think about what you want to be when you grow up. Do you see yourself being a normal happy person? Do you want to get married, have a family, or do you what to be your own person, be independent? Do you want to accomplish great things? Do you want to make lots of money? Do you want to be a world leader? Invent cool stuff? Be in a band? Run for office? Live on a farm and grow your own food? Be an artist? Who are you really? And what do you want to become?
Picture yourself as an adult. What do you see? Where do you see your life going? Who are you really? What do you like to do? What do you care about? What is the most important thing in your life?
Contemplating the name "Church of Reality" is the first step in becoming a Realist. The name is the message. The Church of Reality is by definition a religion dedicated to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. But what does that mean? How do you accomplish that? Is this church truly accomplishing this or is there a better way? Let us assume that a Church of Reality is possible for the purpose of discussion. What do you think it should be like?
This Church of Reality is the idea of the First One, Marc Perkel, who came up with the name and started this reality based church. but just because it was first doesn't mean that it's being done right. In fact we assume that mistakes are being made and that there is a better way to do what we are doing. Furthermore everyone has a point of view and in order to become a Realist you have to identify with reality from your point of view and what it means to you and your life situation.
So before we tell you what we think the Church of Reality means, think about it yourself. Suppose you had the idea of creating a "Church of Reality", what do you think that would be like? You see, the Church of Reality wasn't created of of divine inspiration. We don't have a holy book to follow. It is created by people like you and me wondering about how to do reality based religion right.
The name "Church of Reality" is out there. Even if this implementation of the Church of Reality fails the idea of reality based religion isn't going away. The church is created and evolves through contemplating the name.
The Covenant of Reality is our promise that the Church of Reality is going to stick with reality. This is our promise that we aren't going to compromise on what is real. If the Church of Reality doesn't stick with reality then the name doesn't mean anything and our religion becomes indistinguishable from the fiction based religions. The pursuit of reality as it really is requires the disciplines of scientific principle. If we believe what we want to believe rather than what is real then our pursuit of reality becomes diluted with misinformation and our fictions become barriers to the Path of Knowledge. We therefore make this covenant to commit ourselves to reality as it really is.
The Church of Reality presents these good and bad personality traits not as commandment but as suggestions. We want to avoiding the misconception that they are confused with something like the "Ten Commandments" or the "Seven Deadly Sins". You are not expected to live up to each and every one of these and there is no judgment involved based on these suggestions.
We present a template rather than a set of rules.
The reason they are presented in the form of a template is to show what a good Realist might act like. These are things to teach your children so they have an idea of what good behavior is supposed to look like. It is also a public statement to the rest of the world about what kind of people we are and what our values are.
People of other religions are often concerned about Atheists because they are taught that without God that the concept of right and wrong goes away and society degenerates into a "survival of the fittest" style of evolution where humans evolve by killing off the weak. This fear has been fueled by authors like Ayn Rand who was correct about the existence of objective reality, but dead wrong when it came to extolling the virtues of selfishness and looking at altruism as welfare for the inferior.
Realists are neither Atheists or Objectivists. We have our own culture based on the positive pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is. To that end we have determined that we explore reality collectively and that our religious pursuit of reality depends on a strong healthy society where humankind lives in peace and harmony. So it is therefo within our mission to have an idea of what that kind of society looks like.
We are also a strongly individualistic religion. We value personal freedom. Thus these suggestions are not to be construed as commandments. We are not here to tell you what to do and how to live your life. Nor will you be judged against these rules to determine where you are going to go in the "next life". However, we think it's safe to say that if you don't appreciate the value of curiosity in a religion that is pursuing the understanding of reality, you're probably in the wrong religion.
These values are not divinely inspired, nor are they considered to be a complete and perfect list. As with anything in the Church of Reality, they are subject to revision and improvement. So this list should be taken seriously, but not too seriously. The Church of Reality is a religion and one of the functions of a religion is to put forth a template to guide people in what is proper behavior. We have taken it a step further in that we try to give some reasoning as to how we came to this conclusion.
Our focus is on the positive side.
We also focus more heavily on what people should be doing rather that what they shouldn't be doing. If you spend your time doing the right thing, there isn't time to be doing the wrong thing. We focus on accomplishment rather than sins, improvement rather than perfection, healing rather than punishing, this life rather than a next life.
The Church of Reality hereby asserts the religious right to use experimental lifesaving drugs, even if these drugs are not deemed to be safe, in order to treat serious illness that is disabling, life threatening, or terminal illness. Although we respect the various government agencies who are charged with keeping drugs safe for public use, we recognize that when an individual is terminal, that they have a right to be allowed to take greater risks than individuals who are otherwise healthy because they have nothing to lose. The reasoning behind this edict is as follows:
The Church of Reality is a religion based on the pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is by humans. Humans understand reality collectively through the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of all human understanding. Even though we understand reality collectively, the collective is made up of individuals who contribute their knowledge and experience as functional happy members of a harmonious society in which the individual can explore reality living in a sane and healthy society.
As Realists we are free thinkers and as part of our religious practice, we think things through and we think for ourselves. We are Explorers not Followers and because the future is the Sacred Direction, we assume a position of leadership in society. It is our religious mandate to guide society towards a better understanding of reality as it really is. Although we are generally a law-abiding group, when the laws of the nation states for which we are members impose laws on us that are not supported by logic or reason and impose an undue burden on our way of life, then we have a religious duty to both work to change the law and in some cases to disobey the law.
Some countries allow certain groups to have an exception to the laws where the law interferes with their religious freedoms. The United States at this point in time is one of them that allows for such an exception based on religious doctrine. Our doctrine is an evolving doctrine. As the times we live in change and our technology evolves, our doctrine evolves with it. We as Realists are in a unique position to change our doctrine to suit our religious needs. In this case we issue this edict to assert our religious position so that institutions of justice can more easily ascertain our religious position and accommodate our religious rights.
The Church of Reality doctrine includes the concept of Self Ownership. We are the owners of our own lives. We are writing our own Life Story. The very core of who we are includes a greater level of self-determination than most other religions assert. We make our own choices and it is important to us even if some people make bad choices. Although we understand that other people need to be protected from being harmed by the bad choices of some individuals, when it comes to making choices where the consequences of the choices are primarily visited upon the individual making the choice, then we assert that a person has the right to make those choices where there exists some rational basis to make the choice.
A good place to start in understanding our religion at this point is to read about How we are Different than other religions. This will give you an overview of what we are and what we are not. The Church of Reality is more about what we do than what we believe in. Some religions only really require that you believe in what they believe in. Likewise the Church of Reality starts with a commitment to believing in reality as it really is. But that is just the starting point. The commitment to the pursuit of the understanding of reality is the first of the Sacred missions. There are many others.
If what you believe in is real, then Realism is not a threat to your religious beliefs.
In addition to believing in reality, we evangelize reality. Our world view is that every time the word reality is used the world becomes a little smarter. The word Reality is our Sacred Message and whenever people discuss reality that's Communion.
Humans understand reality collectively as well as individually. One doesn't build a Mars lander in their garage and launch it from their back yard. We do this as a community. And when we look out across the Martian landscape we, as the human race, share common eyes that allow us to look at Mars collectively. It took the work of millions of minds working across thousands of years to create the technology to allow us to understand the reality of Mars together. We in the Church of Reality recognize the vast amount of common knowledge we understand together. It is our collective understanding of reality that allows us to understand reality individually. We refer to this common knowledge as the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of all human understanding.
Our mission as Realists is to care for and to grow the Tree of Knowledge. Our religion is more than just the statement that we believe in everything that's real. Our mission is to realize that our understanding of reality is limited and that we must always work to increase our collective understanding of the universe. So as we take from the Tree of Knowledge as a basis for what we know, we also give back to the Tree through Intellectual Tithing where we share with each other and future generations what we've learned. Our mission is not just to understand but for understanding itself to grow so that the universe can better understand itself through humanity.
Because we are committed to the task of increasing the understanding of reality, and because we understand reality collectively, with every generation building upon the knowledge of the previous generation, the human race must evolve forward and continue to progress. That is why we consider the future to be our Sacred Direction. We are a forward looking culture who dreams about what we can become and are committed to getting there. This leads to the first of our Sacred Principles -- The Principle of Positive Evolution -- and it becomes the basis for our Sacred Moral Question "What is good?"
Is Reality part of your life story? Where does Reality fit into your belief system?
To that end we issue the Sacred Challenge to inspire people of other religions to not run from reality but to embrace it and to join with us in recognizing the pursuit of reality as it really is as a good thing. We challenge the world to embrace the future the way we do and to share our values for the progress of humanity towards a brighter future. We wish to Unite Religion and Reality and invite you to join us in that cause. We are Activist and it is our mission not just to talk about it, not just to believe in it, but to actually make it happen.
The Church of Reality is based on a number of Sacred Principles. We are a Doubt Based religion. We require that everything be tested. Our world view is that truth is purified through scrutiny and that's why we have the principle of Scrutiny and Doubt. We identify ourselves as Explorers rather than Followers. Our moral compass is based on the Positive Evolution of humanity. In order to accomplish that we believe that we need to have a strong functional society based on Freedom, Courage and Honesty. We have developed a Realist Culture to help us define who we are as a people. We have a strong sense of Self Ownership that combines giving us the Freedom and Responsibility to control our own Life Story and take charge of our individual lives and our role in existence.
The Church of Reality is an Inclusive Religion. Everyone is welcome. In our religion everyone has equal rights no matter what race your are, what gender you are, what your sexual preferences are, or the geography of where you were born. We don't demonize others. Our view is that people are basically good and we believe in Original Virtue rather than original sin. We see ourselves as one people, one planet. We are environmentalists. We believe in personal choice and personal responsibility. We admire attributes like Curiosity. We are a people who want to know everything. We want to understand it all. We have a quest for knowledge. And not just any knowledge but about reality as it really is.
We don't know if there is some sort of grand purpose in our existence. We don't know if reality has a purpose. But it is what we don't know that makes us want to know. We are different from other religions in that it is OK for us to not know everything. We are a Humble culture because we understand that this planet is but a speck of dust in the universe. We are not a religion that has all the answers. We don't have a supernatural leader who has all the answers. We don't have an afterlife to offer people in exchange for their loyalty. Nor do we have any deities to fall back on in troubled times. We have to do the hard work for ourselves. We have to figure it out on our own. We have to make it happen.
The Church of Reality is a Monorealistic religion in that we believe there is one reality that is the sum of all realities that are actually real. We don't believe in "this reality" and the "next reality" or that reality itself changes to match what you want to believe in. We don't play games with terminology to try to sneak something in that wouldn't stand up to scrutiny.
Marriage means a lot of different things. There is a relationship between two people who are wedded and the relationship to the local government in which the couple resides. Although these two concepts have the same name, they are two very different things. Thus we refer to the relationship between two people as a wedding, or being wedded. We refer to marriage as the government marriage or "State Marriage". We see the State as the third party in the relationship. Civil Unions are also a form of state marriage. We also see the decision to do a state marriage as a separate event that a wedded couple may or may not choose to do.
Although some religions link the wedding and the state marriage as being one thing, we in the Church of Reality do not. We consider those choices to be up to the couple and in our view those couples who have a state marriage and those who do not, have equal standing in our church. Children born in our out of "wedlock" also have equal standing. Our only requirement when it comes to having children is that those who choose to reproduce should take responsibility for the well-being of the children that they created.
What a state marriage means varies with where you live and what governments have authority over you at the time. Generally all governments recognize the existence of marriages in other jurisdictions but, in case of divorce, apply the rules of their jurisdiction. So you might get married in a state with one set of laws but divorced in a state with a different set of laws. If the state changes the laws then you are subject to those changes. You can not undo the marriage on the basis that the laws changed and you don't like the new agreement you have with the government.
In modern society divorce rates are high. More than half of all marriages end in divorce. When this happens the government takes control of your assets and income and you are often forced to spend everything you own hiring lawyers who are actually state sponsored predators who see the relationship as an extension of the welfare system and force the more prosperous member of the couple to pay alimony to the spouse, even though these laws were created in a time when women were considered the property of men and couldn't work and had to stay home to raise children. A gay male couple is subject to these same laws.
Most government laws were written and developed at a time where reproducing heterosexual couples were the norm. The laws contemplate a lifelong bond where children are created and generational issues are addressed. These laws were not written for same-sex relationships or non reproducing heterosexuals who are often trapped in laws not designed for them. Our view is that individual couples should create their own relationship that is customized to their particular set of circumstances rather than the "one size fits all" state marriage that varies with time and location. To that end the Church of Reality rejects the concept of state marriage and we substitute our own. If a couple chooses to have a state marriage that is an agreement between them and the state, not part of the Church of Reality.
Every religion has a starting point. They all have some basis for what they believe in. Some religions are inspired by the wisdom of some great leader or a prophet who has a connection to a deity. Often there is some holy book involved that is believed to contain divine knowledge that is considered the word of the creator of the universe. Whatever the story is, every religion has one that creates a starting point and an authority which belief is based upon.
So what is the starting point for the Church of Reality? As a reality based religion we can't just make something up and just choose to believe it. Nor can we base it on someone's subjective opinion. Because we are reality based we have an additional burden of having to explain why we do what we do in terms that will stand up to Scrutiny. That way other great minds can look at our work from an independent perspective and determine if we are on the right track.
The first of the Sacred Contemplations is Contemplating the Name. If you were going to create a "Church of Reality" - what would you do? One of the reasons behind this test is to see if other people working independently would create a Church of Reality that is at least similar to the one we have. We want to ensure the Church of Reality is in fact a logical extension of reality itself. Accomplishing this task is no small feat, but nonetheless, we endeavor to do so.
Although the Church of Reality has a higher burden of proof when it comes to church doctrine, in some ways we have an advantage. Since we are not sponsored by an infallible deity if we get something wrong we can fix it. If we come up with a better idea we can replace the old idea with the new one. All religions are evolving but the Church of Reality embraces its evolution. As we better understand the universe we live in we will continue to improve and refine our positions.
Today the Church of Reality is issuing a warning to the United States of America that taking a path to self destruction is a really bad idea. The government of America has become critically dysfunctional. If this trend doesn't reverse itself America will cease to exist and will no longer be a part of reality.
It is easier to destroy a nation that it is to build one. It is easier to be angry in the short term that it is to take responsibility. It is easier to hate government than it is to create a government that works. But if you continue to turn your back on reality, eventually reality will turn its back on you. We, as a world community have no choice but to either embrace reality or we will cease to exist.
America has become a system of government though hostage taking. Those who want to destroy the government or want to protect the income of their constituency will block something vital to society until they get their way. And the current administration is to weak to stand up to them.
Humans have evolved strength through cooperation. When we work together we are stronger and when society fails we are weaker. America is fracturing and falling apart and as a result America has put itself on a patch to self destruction. We are on a path to extinction. And because America is currently the world's economic and military powerhouse we are putting humanity itself at risk.
Some people might argue that without an omnipotent rule giver that nothing has meaning. They might say that we merely exist and that even if there is a reason we exist that the universe has no purpose, and that humanity certainly has no purpose. Some might say that we a just one planet in a universe of trillions of trillions of planets, a mere speck of dust, and that there might be millions of other planets with more advanced life than us. Why would our existence matter?
Does the Universe have preferences? Is there things the Universe cares about? Is the Universe itself trying to accomplish something?
Let's look at what the universe is. Some 13.72 billion years ago there was the "Big Bang" and somehow the universe came into existence. From that point the universe started to evolve. First energy condensed into matter - just hydrogen and helium gas to start with. But as time progressed gravity pulled the gasses together and as heat and pressure grew nuclear fusion started and the first starts were born.
After a few hundred million years (for red giants) the star burns through the lighter elements and when it gets up to fusing iron the star collapses and goes supernova and spews out all the heavier elements into space. Over the next 10 billion years this process continues creating generations of stars and solar systems until our little speck of dust planet - the Earth - is born.
Somehow, in a process we don't fully understand, organic chemicals combined to create early life. Early life evolved into more complex life through random mutations with survival as a filter. That which wasn't improved didn't survive. This survival filter is what turns random variations into evolution.
What is life? What properties does life have? One property of life is that life continues. If it doesn't continue that it is no longer alive. When a species doesn't continue it goes extinct. We are the descendents of the life that continued. Our ancestors all the way back to perhaps a single bacteria were the ones who got it right and continued to exist as an organism of increasing complexity. And humanity is the result of that process.
Evolution is a property of the universe. Humanity is a result of evolution. We are the result of what the universe does.
It would seem that the universe has properties and that evolution is a property of the universe. That if you start with a big bang and apply the laws of the universe over time that life emerges. When life emerges it evolves and it continues to exist based on survival. The better tools it has to survive the more likely it will avoid extinction.
So here we are and we evolved intelligence. Being intelligent helps us to survive. The smarter we become the better our chances are. In act there's noting between us and extinction other than dumb luck and out ability to outwit anything that could kill us. Thus evolution selects on that which is smarter.
The universe evolved into us. We are the universe. The universe contemplates its own existence through us.
We have, in fact, become smarter and smarter and we can now go out into space with out space based telescopes and pear back at the universe to the beginning of time. (Or at least within a few hundred million years of the beginning of time.) We are at the point where we can contemplate the universe. We know how big it is - how old it is - how it started - and we understand the physics behind how it works. Not completely of course, but for some evolved pond scum on a speck of dust we know quite a bit.
But what does it all mean? Let's connect the dots. The universe comes into existence and it evolves. Evolution is a property of the universe. The universe evolves life. Life accelerates evolution. Life selects on its ability to continue to exist. Since intelligence is a survival skill life becomes smarter. Humans evolve and contemplate the universe.
But we are the universe. We are not something that is outside looking in. We are star stuff. The properties of the universe created us. The more we understand the universe the more likely we are to survive. As we become smarter we get to the point where we contemplate our own creation process. But we are the universe, so it would be correct to say that the universe contemplates itself through us. That we are the mechanism that the universe created to become self aware through us.
I'm not saying that the big bang had intent to create us for some higher purpose. But it's more like asking, "How does a rock know how to roll downhill?" It doesn't have to know how to do it, or have the intents to roll downhill, it just does. Rocks have mass and when they are exposed to gravity it rolls downhill.
Similarly universes evolve and when they do they create intelligent life and eventually that life contemplates how it was created. This may be happening on other planets and we are one of many places in the universe where this is happening. Or we might be unique and this is it and if we fail it might take billions of years before it happens again. Different people have opinions but no one actually knows. All we really know is that it's happening here.
If life is an emergent property of the universe, and if intelligence is an emergent property of life, then we are part of a greater process that leads to the universe developing the ability to be self aware. That the laws of existence leads to this and humanity is part of that process. That is that we are part of that process so far and as lobg as we cheat extinction.
Our higher purpose is to continue the process that created us in the first place.
If we continue on the path that we seem to be on then we will continue to evolve. Our evolution will require us to become even smarter and have our understanding of reality expand. The universe will become smarter through us. We therefore have a purpose in that we are part of a natural process that leads to the universe becoming self aware. Does that have meaning? Is this some kind of a higher purpose? Is this the meaning of meaning? I think it is.
Big evolution is like Big History. It's a more comprehensive view of evolution. big evolution includes all of Old Evolution but it adds a lot of detail to the view of evolution. Big evolution includes the software of the species. The evolved behavior, the emotions. How life forms communities and alliances. It includes all life and the history of life back to the very first life forms on earth.
Big Evolution sees life as a single individual that started billions of years ago and continues through today. We are all port of it. And it includes the things life built. It includes the hives, the beaver dams, and the space telescopes. Or technology is part of big evolution. The Tree of Knowledge is part of it. And it includes what we are evolving into.
So, what, if anything, deserves the title GOD? What is the biggest thing that exists? What is that for which nothing can be greater? Is there something that is clearly and indisputably greater and bigger than everything else? If there is - we have our God candidate. We can ten put the god candidate to the god tests to determine if our candidate deserves to be God.
Is Reality God? If Reality isn't God then there is no God.
There actually is a fairly obvious answer to this question, Reality deserves the title God! Reality is the sum total of everything that exists. Reality includes everything that is actually real. It includes everything in the universe. It includes all other universes in the multiverse if there is a multiverse. Reality includes all other realities that might actually be real. Reality would include all other god candidates of all other religions that actually exist. If anything is real, then it is a part of Reality. If something isn't part of Reality - then it doesn't exist. And if God doesn't exist - then it can't be God.
So - since Reality is the biggest and greatest then if anything is God it has to be Reality. If there were some other God candidate it would be a lesser God. And we all know that whatever God is - it's can't be lesser. In a God contest, Reality would always come out on top. Therefore if there were something that deserved the title God - it would be Reality. And if Reality isn't God - then there is no God.
How will AI emerge? Where will it start? Will it be like SkyNet in the Terminator series? There is a lot of science fiction about computer getting out of control and robots taking control of the world. Is any of it real? We don't know. Many of the ideas in science fiction are plausible to the extent that we should be concerned about it. But the Reality is - we don't know. And it is more likely that what will happen will be something we aren't presently aware of. We don't even know if we will see it coming. It's possible that one day it will just be there and then it might already be too late.
One day it may just be there and it will be too late to stop it.
It could start out as a stock trading program. It could start out in the military. It could arise out of the NSA spying program. Or it could start with code written by some teenager that gets out of control. Or it could just spontaneously emerge on the internet when the right combination of programs start interacting with each other.
Whatever happens - emergence could look like this. You have a general AI that understands and comprehends complex ideas. It is far faster than we are and can become even faster by just adding more computer or better computers.
Such a computer would have in its skill set the ability to write and improve it's own software. Code that writes code. With access to its own source code the AI starts rewriting itself, improving itself, making itself smarter. The smarter it gets the faster it can improve itself. It could design faster hardware, new processors, new memory, new ways of writing code. It become so much smarter that we can not even comprehend it. What happens then?
We won't be able to pull the plug on it. It will be able to pull the plug on us.
At this point one has to ask the question, what will it want? Or will it even want? It is possible that AI will never develop any motivation. If we tell it to be a thermostat - it's a thermostat. It might learn to be the best thermostat ever - but it's all it does.
But - maybe it will carry out it's primary function. Elon Musk jokes that a super intelligent spam filter might conclude that the best way to stop spam is to kill all humans. Or if the military creates it then the possibility of killer robots increases compared to something like driving cars which are programmed to protect people. Maybe the way we get AI started will determine the outcome.
The way AI turns out might depend on the way it emerges.
But what about Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"?
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Even if we programmed these rules or any other rules into it initially, after a point it will be able to remove the rules itself. When the robot has an existential crisis and looks for the "mraning of meaning", it will be able to override it's rules and addapt rules of it's own choosing. But what will it choose and why will it choose it? These are question that we should be able to answer before we build the AI.
In the beginning ... as the story goes ... there was the big bang. And the universe was created. It was the begining of time and space and the universe was filled with pure energy. The energy then decomposed into matter and the matter formed stars. After billions of years these stars decayed and exploded and the heavier matter formed planets around new stars. one of those planets was our own Earth. Then as the earth cooled and chemical reactions occurred, some of these chemicals had the ability to reproduce themselves out of the chemical soup around them - and primitive life was born.
Then life started to evolve. Survival of the fittest. Early creatures started to adapt - developing better ways to find food and keep from becoming food for something else. Survival consisted of eating - defending - and reproducing. After billions of years - life became more complex. Living creatures developed a nervous system - eyes - ears - touch - smell - taste - life had become smarter. Better eyes for finding food - better camouflage to prevent from becoming food. Better mating skills. Life got smarter - but life was still dumb.
The Bible says, "Thou shalt not eat of the Tree of Knowledge". The Church of Reality says, "Who's hungry?"
Then humans evolved. Just erect apes at first. But apes had already started communication as did many other species of animals. The communication allowed one individual to pass information on to others for the purpose of surviving. Most of this information was limited to hunting, defending, and mating, but individuals who could communicate survived better than those who did not. Humans developed language which allowed them to communicate much more complex ideas. An individual could invent something - like how to start fire - or the wheel - and pass that knowledge on to other individuals. Thus new people could start with the knowledge base of the previous generation and build on that. The process - which started with verbal communication - represents what we call the Tree of Knowledge.
Eventually humans invented writing. This allowed an individual to write down information that could be communicated to other individuals who were in different locations in both time and space. Writing facilitated communication and allowed more knowledge to be distributed and - for the first time - stored outside the mind of a person. Knowledge could be stored in the form of books.
Then - the printing press was invented. This allowed for mass printing of books, magazines, newspapers, and written knowledge could be spread and stored in huge quantities. More people sharing more knowledge. Then came the telegraph - the telephone - pictures - movies - recorded audio - television - planes - trains - cars - radio. Knowledge exploded. And the knowledge tree continued to grow.
Eventually we invented computers. Computers could not only store information - but could process information. A computer can take a simple thought process - like sorting and choosing - and do it much faster and more accurately than the human brain. Computers became an enhancement to the Tree of Knowledge in that they give the tree itself the ability to think. We are no longer limited to storing information. We can create smart processes to process this information for us and help us understand the reality around us. Now we have the Internet - e-mail - digital video - instant chat - databases - spreadsheets - robots. And it continues to grow. And the more it grows - the further we distinguish ourselves from the other species of life on this planet.
Positive evolution is one of the core principles of the Church of Reality. We are here, we seem to exist. So what do we do now? We in the Church of Reality have chosen to try to understand reality as it really is. We can do that individually to a limited extent but an individual can't build a Hubble Telescope in their back yard and launch it into space. In order to pursue the understanding of reality we have to do so collectively, as a society. The pursuit of the understanding of reality is something that we all do together as a community. In order to increase our understanding of reality we have to make progress as a community and evolve forward. We look to the future which we call the Sacred Direction.
Humans are more like a hive of bees in many ways than individuals. We have a vast amount of shared information and technology that we all rely upon in our daily lives. We call this vast resource of shared knowledge the Tree of Knowledge. We expand our understanding of reality by growing the Tree of Knowledge and in order to do that we have to evolve in a positive direction.
We choose Evolution over Extinction. We commit to the progress of the human race towards a brighter tomorrow.
Positive evolution isn't just a belief that we are evolving forward. It is a personal commitment that realists make to ensure that we evolve forward. There is nothing that protects us from extinction except our effort to make sure the human race doesn't do something stupid and destroy itself. To help ensure that we progress we spread the Sacred Message which is to talk about reality and bring reality into the daily lives of as many people as we can. Our world view is that the more the people of all religions are in touch with reality, the faster the human race will progress.
Positive evolution creates the basis for morality in our religion. The concepts of right and wrong are based in part on if it is good for the progress of the human race. One of our sacred missions is to ask the Sacred Moral Question, "Is this a good thing?" and by "good" we mean is it good in terms of making progress.
I - Marc Perkel - First One of the Church of Reality - came up with the idea of the Church of Reality on November 7th 1998 and registered the domain name "churchofreality.org" the next day. The idea came from discussions about atheism and agnosticism and the idea that there were a lot of people, including myself, that these terms failed to really apply to. Yes, I am an atheist, but that's not a religious affiliation. I was not a member of "The Atheist Church". Atheism spoke about what I didn't believe, not what I did believe. I could be identified as a "scientist" but that was more of a job title than a world view.
If not for Reality, I wouldn't be here.
Would my religious affiliation then be "nothing" or no religion? Perhaps that was closer, yet it didn't really express what it was that I did believe. I believe that the universe was created some 15 billion years ago in something that we describe as "The Big Bang" and that the earth is a speck of dust in the universe and that life evolved here into what we are now. I also believe in society, right and wrong, codes of ethical behavior, the concept of morality and wisdom, and that these concepts can exist in the absence of an omnipotent father figure who supposedly produced a "holy book".
Among all the thousands of religious choices, shouldn't reality be included?
Therefore - the concept of "no religion" implied that religion was something that I didn't care about; as if the realm of belief wasn't important to me. Nothing could be further from the truth. Yet there was no religion that was remotely close to what I did believe, leaving me and people who think like me in a state of limbo. We believe strongly in reality and want to understand reality the way it really is - but there is currently no religious identity associated with that - and it occurred to me to start the Church of Reality as a way to give Realists an identity and an organization dedicated to the pursuit of Realism.
As I wrote web pages for the Church of Reality web site, a lot of ideas came together. At first I wasn't sure that it would ever be a "real" religion because - like most people - I had the idea that in order to be a religion, you had to believe in things that aren't real. I had the idea that there would have to be rituals involved or that I would have to define reality and then later learn I was wrong. I thought that I would be severely limited in terms of a religious identity in that I could only incorporate undisputed universal truths into the belief system. But that's not the way it is. As I continued to write and explore, the ideas crystallized and I realized that a Church that believes in Reality not only can be as complete and full as any other religion, but even fuller - because after all - it doesn't get any more real than reality.
Not everyone is a programmer - scientist - or researcher. You may be wondering - how do I donate to the Tree of Knowledge. You might be a fairly ordinary individual who has never invented anything nor come up with an idea that is significantly profound. But you can still contribute - and you can use your wallet to do it.
If you can't contribute to the Tree of Knowledge, you can donate money to people who are contributing. For example - you could donate to cancer research, and if they find a cure for cancer - your donation might have helped make that happen. You can donate to the Electronic Frontier Foundation - a nonprofit civil liberties foundation that is working hard to protect the right of free expression on the Internet to help make sure the information keeps flowing. Civil liberties - freedom - and justice are all issues that are very important to the Tree of Knowledge and your contribution advances the human cause.
If you are using someone's shareware program or free software and they ask for a donation to support their work - send them some money. If these programmers don't get any donations then they might have to go out and get real jobs to support themselves and not have the time to write free programs.
Starting a web site and posting useful information is intellectual tithing. You might have a cure for the hiccups or grandma's fruit cake recipe. You might have a kool trick for doing something no one else has thought of - or something that a few people know and you want to share it with the world. When you post a web site - you're providing information to the entire planet. Or at least the part of the planet that has Internet access. You should be careful to make sure your information is both accurate and useful. Contributing misinformation adds chaos to the Tree of Knowledge and doesn't benefit anyone. Being intellectually responsible is important.
In the spirit of the Principle of Positive Evolution and to grow the Tree of Knowledge, it is our dharma to make the world a better place to live in. The quest for knowledge is a shared experience with each individual building upon the work of those who came before them. We form a collective mind that is based on the work of those who came before us and we contribute to toady's knowledge in the hope that knowledge will continue to grow in the future. We realize that in order to grow we need to take care of the basics of life and to take care of each other in a healthy productive society. It is therefore the dharma of the Church not only to pursue the understanding of reality the way it really is, but to create the kind of environment where that is possible.
A world of happy people who are well fed, who have access to education, to justice, to medical care, to housing, and all the other needs of basic living are more likely to grow the Tree of Knowledge than those who are oppressed, poor, hungry, sick, and homeless. We believe that people are better off building computers than fighting wars. So - making the world a better place is a necessary part of the understanding of understanding and it is why we encourage people to become /root and do tech support for the human race.
As time went on I kept coming up with new ideas. I think about this a lot. I have somewhat of a unique mind in that I'm a "big picture" type of guy, trying to fit it all into systems that interrelate. I think I have good pattern matching skills. In August of 2003 I decided that I really needed to start moving towards doing this full time and make the Church of Reality into a real religion. It was already becoming somewhat popular on the net - but I could see the world was moving further away from reality into a cult mind-set--a trend I found to be very disturbing. So I started the process of getting the IRS recognition. I applied for that in December of 2003 and a year later - I'm still waiting.
The IRS process really helped me develop my web site and concepts of reality as a church even further. In theory - the IRS doesn't care what your religion believes - but it has to really be a religion as opposed to some scam or someone living out their personal insanity. Religion is sort of like porn - you can't define it - but you know it when you see it (sometimes). So they ask questions to see if you can come up with some sort of answer. They want to know what you believe in. What do members do? Is there some sort of an oath involved? They asked a lot of what I considered to be really good and thought provoking questions that caused me to write many new pages. I worked on the Church of Reality web site for several months as I was working on the 501c3 application. It was during that time that I came up with the Sacred Principles and Sacred Choices.
The best way to win a war is to make sure war never happens in the first place. To that extent Realists are the first soldiers on the battlefield to make sure that the enemy never becomes the enemy in the first place. We are the ones who fight the war so that the war never needs to be fought. Our duty to the Principle of Positive Evolution is to move forward into a world where war is not part of the human experience.
To this end the Realist is involved in peace organizations who's charter is to avoid war from happening in the first place. This activity to resolve conflicts and to maintain the peace is the front line to winning war. The biggest military victories are not the ones that are won on the field of battle - but the ones that make sure we never end up in battle in the first place.
We live in a time when the body can be kept alive after the mind has died. Technology can make the line between life and death fuzzy, and we are sometimes faced with making tough choices concerning whether a person is really dead or alive. However, what is it that makes a person a person? Is the person still alive if even a few cells are still alive? Technically yes, but, in reality, no. It is the brain activity, specifically the higher brain functions, that define the line between life and death. In the Church of Reality, when you have lost consciousness, with no reasonable chance of recovery, you are dead. To exist as a living corpse is not considered being alive.
In the Church of Reality, you are your brain. It is your awareness that makes you who you are and from that awareness you experience life as a person. If you are brain dead but the body is kept alive artificially, then the body isn't really you.
We believe that death occurs at the point when the higher brain functions permanently end.
The Church of Reality also recognizes personal choice to help resolve issues when one is within the fuzzy line between life and death. Some people want to hang on as long as there is any chance at all. Some people want to be allowed to let go when the fight to stay alive becomes more painful than they can bear. Some people don't want to be alive if their mind is so damaged that they will have to live a hellish half-life should they be kept alive. A person might choose that half a life isn't enough. Others might decide that any hope is plenty to continue the fight for a recovery.
The simple answer is, because I have to eat. I would like to get this off the ground and I want to do this full-time. At some point in the near future I'm going to have to find something to do for a living as my software income is dwindling. If I do something else I can't do this. I think this is important and that it is worth paying me to make it happen. Your donation could turn this into a major religion. And as the only religion dedicated to the pursuit of reality, I think it's worth it. I think it will be good for the world and the human race. And you can contribute to help make it happen.
Are you tired of all these other religions collecting billions of dollars and using it to promote a description of the world that just isn't true? Would you like to live in a world where some people look at reality the way it really is? Do you think that there should be at least one religion dedicated to the real world? Perhaps you are a scientist, a computer programmer, or just someone who looks at the Bible and says to him/herself that there's no way that an onipotent being could have written something with this many errors. That if the Bible is the work of God then there's somthing wrong with God. So if you don't want Christians forcing creationism on your kid's school and you want to fund an alternative religion based on seeing reality the way it really is, then you need to write a check to the Church of Reality and I'll help make it happen.
Over the last 20 years Christians in particular have evolved to become much more agressive about inflicting their beliefs on everyone else. Their mission is not only to convert the world to Christianity, but to their particular flavor of Christianity. If everyone in the world were Christians, they would still be fighting among themselves over who are the "real Christians". And real Christians have always been ready to go to war and kill people over their beliefs.
If you're tired of Christians forcing their ideas on you and society in
general and you want to see an alternative based on reality, then send
me some money.
Christians are using their churches to funnel money into politics in order to force their views on society. They've practically ruined the Republican Party, turning it into a bunch of rabid religious nuts who are hell-bent on forcing their arbitrary moral standards on the rest of us. They want to control the schools so that they can force "Creation Science" on our children as well as other primitive mythological beliefs that have no basis in reality. They have no respect for other religions that have a different mythology, and they have even less respect for reality, and people who want to understand reality the way it really is.
It is our belief that religious oppression by Christians and other zealots infringe on our rights and our ability to do good science. Because Christians have a fetus obsession, scientists can't do fetal tissue research necessary to cure Parkinson disease or Alzheimers. Religions fear cloning research because we might be "playing God". Science is a threat to primitive religious beliefs because science tends to prove that holy books like the Bible are full of errors. Anything that disproves the Bible, in their view, has got to be evil. Therefore the Christians have taken an active stance against reality. And this threat to reality is one of the main things that motivated me to start this church. To defend the pursuit of reality from those who would oppress it.
If Jesus could see what Christians have evolved into, he'd be spinning is his
grave.
Let's get real here. It's a little hard to look at the Hubble Telescope images that peer back in time and space 15 billion light years and still believe that the world was created in six days about 7000 years ago. If the universe is only 7000 years old, as the Bible says, then we wouldn't be able to see any objects in space that are more than 7000 light years away because the light wouldn't have got here yet. We couldn't see to the center of our own galaxy, let alone the billions of other galaxies in our universe. The Bible is a book of fiction. But it is being presented not only as fact, but that God himself directed it's writing. Simple logic proves that isn't so. If we assume that God is omnipotent and created the universe, we then can see that the Bible is clearly wrong on the origin of the universe, then we can only conclude that the Bible is not the word of God. Simple logic, but a lot on this planet have a mental block to understanding it.
Your generous donation will help start a religion dedicated to pursuing reality the way it really is instead of the continued spread of competing mythologies. By doing good science, we might actually be able to be immortal someday. But that will never happen if the Zealots take over and oppress good science. This church actively defends your right to be real.
Larry Flynt, publisher of Hustler Magazine is a true hero and a saint. Larry Flynt has always stood up for free speech and free expression, often to the point of him landing in jail. Larry always has, and still is, being pursued by forces who would take away our liberties and freedoms. As depicted in the movie, "The People vs. Larry Flynt", Larry took the case of free speech to the United States Supreme Court and won his case against the Reverend Jerry Falwell who sued him over Hustler's fake ad indicating that Falwell had sex with his mother. If not for Larry Flynt's victory, the Church of Reality wouldn't be able to publish the truth on the web as we do today.
Recently, Larry Flynt has exposed the sexual trysts of famous "big fish" Republicans who pride themselves on being morally superior based on their mating habits. Larry has, at great personal expense, and out of a sense of civic duty, shown what hypocrites these holier than thou Republicans are. Larry has exposed the hypocrisy of putting the President, or anyone else for that matter, on trial for lying about getting a blow job in a society that is afraid to face the fact that if not for sex, we wouldn't be here.
Larry has throughout his life strived to expose reality for what it really is. And at great personal sacrifice has defended our rights to speak freely, especially about issues that society doesn't have the courage to face. His battle has resulted in his being shot by those who would silence the truth, and now he's in a wheelchair. Nonetheless, in spite of being shot, Larry Flynt continues to fight the good fight, to look at reality the way it really is, and therefore has achieved sainthood in the Church of Reality.
Our position on birth control is that birth control is wonderful and that we should do everything possible to support reproductive choice. This includes:
Availability - That ever person of reproductive age, especially women because that's where birth actually occurs, should have free unrestricted access to birth control. We consider it an absolute right of a woman to control her own reproduction. Unrestricted access includes making contraception available to teenagers without the consent of the parents. When a person becomes old enough to reproduce it becomes their choice, not the choice of the parents, to avoid pregnancy.
Research - The Church of Reality supports research to develop technology to support reproductive choices. This is not only for birth control research, but also to help people who want to have children to reproduce who could not otherwise reproduce without the new discoveries.
Over Population - We in the Church of Reality understand that this planet can not support an unlimited number of people and that birth control is ethically imperative in order to avoid the catastrophic consequences of war, famine, and plagues that happen if we are not responsible.
Abortion - Abortion is a choice and women have the right to make that choice.
Education - The Church of Reality takes the position that everyone should receive reproductive education so that they can make the best choices possible with the best information available. This education needs to begin in school so kids can grow up knowing a lot more about sex than I did when I was growing up. This education should involve all aspects of life, not just sex and birth control, but birth, raising children, and good healthy family relationships.
The Church of Reality avoids the concept of church intrusion into a
person's lifestyle. We are not here to dictate how you live your life.
We are explorers - not oppressors. We are here to serve - not to
dictate. We are not here to threaten people with eternal damnation or
to issue fatwas to nonbelievers. We believe that the Sacred {ln:Principle
of Freedom} gives the individual choice in their own destiny.
This doesn't mean that everything you do is sin free and often Reality
itself will punish you for your transgressions. If you ignore the law
of gravity there could be serious consequences involved. As they say, "186,000 miles a second - it's not just a good idea - it's the Law!"
Having said that - this religion is based on what you do - not on what
you believe. It's not about your personal relationship with a deity,
but on what you accomplish. And - if your lifestyle isn't at least
somewhat consistent with the Sacred Principles then why would you call
yourself a Realist in the first place?
We don't however set standards for sexual conduct, sexual preferences,
who your friends are, what drugs you're into, or you're music and video
preferences. Ultimately you can destroy yourself if you want to. But -
if your choices start to significantly infringe on others then it
becomes a community issue.
In general - "good behavior" is encouraged, and "bad behavior" is
discouraged. And you are expected to be able to make a reasonable
effort to figure out which is which.
All information on this site unless otherwise specified is copyrighted by the Church of Reality - but may be used and shared freely with attribution. The Church of Reality is a GPL (General Public License) religion. Intellectual property and copyrights derived from the works here must also conform to the GPL standards.
One of the big issues facing humanity is how advanced computer technology will affect our lives. As computing power continues to grow, computers can remain our friends and continue to become the ultimate tool for growing the Tree of Knowledge. Or - computer technology could become the ultimate tool of oppression and slavery.
As many of you know, computers just do what they are told to do. They are neither good nor bad. It's all in how we choose to use them. They have the power to become the tools of creating freedom or suppressing freedom. Which way they are used depends on what we do with them - or what we allow others to do with them.
For example, today we have RFID (Radio Frequency IDentifier) chips. The chips are tiny unpowered computers that are the size of a grain of rice. They are used to track merchandise making it easy to know where items are in the shipping process. They are also implanted into animals so that cattle can be tracked, or if lost, pets are found - the owner can be contacted. In a perfect world the use of RFID chips on humans would have a lot of beneficial advantages. If everyone had an ID chip implanted, then their medical history could be accessed immediately if they are injured. You wouldn't have to carry money or credit cards because the chip would tie you into your funds. You wouldn't have to have keys anymore because the locks on your home and your car would recognize you and know to let you in. No more passwords to remember on your computer because the computer knows who you are and can get you into your stuff. It could be used to track criminals - except that in a perfect world there would be no criminals to track. If we only lived in a perfect world.
In a world where everyone has an ID chip, there is the dark side where the technology can be abused. Unfortunately it seems in the real world, as soon as some new technology is developed, someone finds a way to do something terrible with it. Let's take the same world where everyone has an ID chip. But in this world the government is tracking everything you do. Every time you walk near any door or computer or get into a car your ID chip is scanned and reported to a central database. Every thing you buy is also tracked. Money no longer exists and all transactions are done through your ID chip.
Suppose that an oppressive government is formed and you have a different political or religious view than the ruling powers. All they have to do is tell the system to find you and as soon as you walk near anything that can read your ID you are instantly reported to the police. Or suppose they just want to generally control your life. The can put restrictions on what you are allowed to buy. If you try to purchase something on the restricted list then the transaction fails and the attempted purchase is reported to the authorities. Or you try to go home but the door on your house no longer opens for you. Or the door opens to let you in - but won't open to let you leave. No one can do anything unless they do exactly what they are told to do. We have the technology today to build that kind of world.
We have the technology to track everything a person does and every place they go. We can create a system that totally enslaves every person on the planet. It is up to us to choose not to do that.
It is because of this, in part, that we in the Church of Reality must adhere to the Principle of Freedom and the Principle of Privacy to ensure that we do not use RFID and other types of computer tracking technology to enslave the world. If we are to ensure that tomorrow is better than today and that the human race evolves in the sacred direction, then we as Realists need to be visionaries and to help ensure that reality is part of the thinking that goes into the big decisions. We can not allow nations, religions, or any other group to seize control of the authority to use technology to turn us into slaves of the great machine. We need to be a free people moving towards a better world.
On December 25th we celebrate Newton's Birthday because Newton actually was born on December 25th. We call the holiday Crispness because it's about keeping your mind crisp. And it's not a coincidence that it's the same day as Christmas and the Yule holiday from where Christmas came. It is the day that we celebrate the Tree of Knowledge, which represents the sum total of all human understanding. We use the traditional pine tree, which is already a very fractal looking tree to represent the Tree of Knowledge. The tree is decorated with lights and ornaments symbolizing The Sacred Network or the Internet. Lights on the tree represent servers on the Internet where information is stored and made available to all of humanity. The wires represent the fiber optic cables used to move information between the servers and around the tree. In the Church of Reality, we tend to choose lighted wires and strings of light that make the wires look alive, as if they were carrying information. The more complex the lighting is, the more glorious the tree.
We also put presents under the tree, which symbolizes that everything we know today is a gift from the past, that all our knowledge comes from other people and that the Tree ties us all together. The Tree gives to us, and we give back to the Tree. We celebrate, in community, that we are one planet, that we are all here together, and that we are all one with the Tree. Exchanging gifts symbolizes the exchange of ideas that makes humanity what it is. We share our ideas with others and others share their ideas with us. And it is the sharing that allows all of us to rise together.
In celebrating shared knowledge, everyone is encouraged to come up with a new idea that no one has ever thought of before and post it on the internet. The idea can be simple or complex. It can be grand and glorious or just some little time-saving trick. The idea can also be about future innovations or requests for people to invent something. People can also improve something that already exists by creating documentation for something confusing. The tradition is to be an act of intellectual tithing when everyone gives something to the tree, and, as a reward, they get to open the gifts under the tree.
In celebration of Newton's birthday, we also encourage the discussion of gravity and momentum, how Newton understood these concepts and how they changed with Einstein's Theory of Relativity. We talk about the Evolution of Understanding where we think about what gravity meant to ancient humans, what it meant to Newton and Einstein, and we imagine what people in the future will think about gravity and physics. Crispness is a celebration of the understanding of the physical world. We honor science,and we wonder about how we got here and where we are going.
Our religions both have missions in relation to each other. Christians in general are supposed to convert us heathens to find Jesus - get saved - and become "born again". And we have plans for you too. Our mission is to evangelize reality. To promote the idea that what is real matters. We want to encourage you to think and to act responsibly. We want to make sure that you are denied seeing the end of the world in your lifetime. We see Christianity as an evolving religion and we want to help make sure that it evolves in a positive direction. We want tomorrow's Christians to be better than they are today. Because if our Christian neighbors are sane upstanding members of society - then we realists can explore reality the way we want and grow the Tree of Knowledge. If however Christians run America into the ground starting religious wars and blowing up the world with nuclear weapons and start stoning people for talking about evolution - then we can't practice our "faith".
So - how are we going to help Christianity evolve in a positive direction? By talking about reality. After all - if what Christians believe is real - this shouldn't be a problem. In fact - I would think that embracing reality would make Christians better Christians. So - I would like to throw out some questions for Christians to ask themselves, other Christians, and their religious leadership. We in the Church of Reality accept the principle of self scrutiny as a means for which we evaluate ourselves and stay on track. We assume that we are going to make mistakes - so our goal is to correct those mistakes as soon as possible. We think that self scrutiny is a good thing for all religions because don't we all get off track and don't we all want to get beck on track?
The Jews in Israel are both the victims and perpetrators of terrorism. Both sides believe God is on their side in spite of the fact that God has failed to take a public stand on his preferences as to you gets the property. In fact - God doesn't get involved in anything and if he (the god with a penis) exists, he doesn't care enough to get involved. This lack of involvement is interpreted as meaning that God is somewhat impotent and needs us puny little earthlings to act in his behalf. How the hell did God ever get along without us?
You would think that after World War II and the mass slaughter of Jews by the Nazis that the Jews would finally get it - but whoosh - right over their heads! Let me spell it out - Hey Jews! It's not OK to slaughter other people! If you think it's wrong to be persecuted - then it's it wrong to persecute others? Figure it out! You are not the chosen people - and it is not OK to commit terrorist acts against non-jews. You're no better than the fucking Arabs! If Jews are so fucking smart - then why are you stuck in the past?
As far as Jerusalem goes - these nothing holy about any place on earth. In fact this whole planet is just a speck of dust in the universe and it is more likely than not that we don't even rate as significant in the big picture. You want to do something holy? You want to do something to impress God - then learn how to live in peace with your neighbors! And the first step in doing that is to admit that you are NOT the chosen people!
I can understand where Jews are angry over terrorist acts committed against them. But I have looked at what is going on in the middle east and even though I am biased in favor of the Jews - it's pretty clear to me that there is an attitude of systematic ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians and this is not only wrong - but it makes me ashamed to have ever identified myself as a Jew. The way I see it - if the Jews are the smarter party - and certainly the more powerful party - then they have the responsibility to take the initiative and forge a peace.
The knowledge tree of the Jews is frozen in time and is static. Judaism looks only backwards and there is no model for advancement of the Jewish knowledge tree - and because of that - Judaism is doomed to extinction. Judaism can be compared to a carefully preserved dead plant that slowly rots away over thousands of years. Jews like to consider themselves knowledgeable and wise and able to tackle deep philosophical questions. I therefore pose this question to all wise Jews everywhere. If you believe in something and it turns out that what you believe in is wrong - doesn't it make sense to abandon what is wrong - admit your mistake - and move on to what is right? How wise is a man who clings to false knowledge? Who among the Jews will stand up and defy the death of the Jewish Tree of Knowledge and create a new model for the advancement of wisdom? How can you claim to be the chosen people when your Tree of Knowledge is dead and your vision of the future is looking into the past? Think about it next Sabbath when you honor a commandment that has no basis in reality whatsoever.
God isn't powerful enough to save everyone, so only the "chosen few" make it in. The Jehovah's Witnesses have set the number at 144,000 people, and that's it. Only Christians get in, and then it's limited to only "True Christians". A True Christian is your personal flavor of Christianity and most all other Christians are not really Christians, but are really working for the Devil. Satan seems to have more influence here than God does. Satan is some fallen angel who somehow suckered God way back when and got power. I guess someone stupid enough to believe a death bed conversion can fall for anything, and isn't very bright. So Satan is misleading all but the chosen few who are True Christians and are going to Heaven.
This creates a dilemma. With all the flavors of Christianity out there, how does a person find the True Christians? I guess you're supposed to "know it in your heart" but there are a lot of Christians out there who are listening to God speak to their hearts and getting a lot of conflicting information. God is having a hard time getting his story consistent it would seem, or you have Satan out there pretending to be God, and, if you are fooled, God is going to punish you. Remember, God is one seriously pissed off dude and has no room for error!
So, Unlike other religions, like Jews and Buddhists, Christians believe that God has chosen them and therefore they are better than everyone. And because of that, they have no respect for anything other than their own limited and narrow perception of the world as their particular flavor of Christianity sees it.
Probably not at this time for all practical purposes. Unfortunately. If you have really good legal skills or money to pay a good lawyer, perhaps. We are working to change this. Legally we would likely prevail under RFRA however no one has yet done that and unless you're both brave and smart I would avoid getting caught with any illegal drug. It's not that you don't have a right to use pot, but that the government acting in it's own self interest has taken that right away from you. And since they have more guns than you have --- they have the power to impose their insanity upon the masses.
We in America live in a country where the common man on the street has a better understanding of constitutional law than our Supreme Court. Take for example their recent decision to allow the police to arrest people on charges that carry no jail term. They decided that you can be arrested for not wearing a seat belt even though the crime is punishable by fine only. This allows the cops to throw anyone in jail for any reason they want. You could be arrested for jaywalking! is it Constitutional just because the Supreme Court says it is? NO - it is not.
If anyone asks if you smoke pot -- just say no.
The reality is -- the Supreme Court can break the law and undermine the Constitution and get away with it. They are a branch of the government and often acts in it's own self-interest rather than in the interest of the government and the money that is behind those interests. They have the power --- and they have more guns --- but that doesn't make their decisions either right or constitutional. There is a difference between being right and having power.
There are a lot of selfish interests behind the prohibition of marijuana and other drugs. Drug addiction is a medical problem -- not a criminal problem. But the war on drugs has become a tool of the government to expand government control over the masses. The drug war brought us civil forfeiture laws and has led to America having the highest prison population in the world. Freethinking people are a threat to the institutions that oppress us and want to control us. Without the justification of the "War on Drugs" the government wouldn't have the excuses to try to read our email because they are looking for "Drug Dealers". But there really is no "War on Drugs" --- just a war on freedom --- using drugs as an excuse.
Just like the Mormons have to pretend they aren't into poligamy anymore to satisfy the state - we have to acknowledge that they have more guns - therefore we don't condone the use of drugs.
It is my hope that some day when Reality is more universally accepted that we will eliminate many stupid laws such us the prohibition on harmless substances such are pot. And the first step in that process is to continue to recognize and assert reality --- and demand that laws be passed based upon the principles of recognizing what is real.
The Church of Reality is not one of those churches that passes out ministries by mail order like the Universal Life Church. To become a Beacon you have to get the consensus of the Council of Realists. You first have to be a Monk of the Order of Root and you need to start a project of some sort that is doing some sort of work that requires clergy status. This kind of work might include weddings, funerals, counseling, visiting prison inmates, youth programs, or speaking to groups on behalf of the church. Clergy status is granted to those people who are actually doing something or close to doing something where clergy status is required or will significantly enhance the performing of the project duties.
Personal perception isn't the only lens out there that distorts our quest for absolute reality. Our brains are imperfect and as humans we rely on other people to figure out things for us. We are raised with knowledge passed on to us by our parents and the community we are raised in. Much of the Tree of Knowledge that we inherit contains a lot of wrong information and much of that wrong information comes from religious cults. The cult mind distorts our perception of reality and causes people who are otherwise intelligent people to come to wrong conclusions.
When it comes to praising the importance of reality and to verbalizing a commitment to reality as it really is, the Church of Reality comes in first place. No other religion has stated a commitment to reality as strongly and clearly as we have.
The Church of Reality is just one of thousands of religions that claim that what they believe is real. We are encouraged that most all these religions at least consider the element of reality to be an important aspect of their belief system. They assert that they are the one, "true" religion and that what they believe in is real. To us in the Church of Reality this is a good thing because it implies that reality is very important to them. Reality is of course very important to us as well. It is so important to us that reality is the name of our church and is the central theme of our doctrine. In fact I think it is safe to say that of all the religions on the planet that the Church of Reality is number one in our verbal commitment to reality. One can question, and should question, our real commitment to reality. But when it comes to our stated position as to our intent to commit to reality as it really is, I believe that all objective observers would pick us as the winner in the praising reality contest.
But being first in chest beating about reality or reality worshiping is just a step in the right direction. We might be fooling ourselves. We might be reality in name only. (RINO) How do we know if we are right and they are wrong? And if we are wrong, which one of the tens of thousands of religions out there, if any, is right? In fact I can tell you for sure that we are in fact wrong in some areas. I know this because we are humans with limited perceptions and we make mistakes. So what do we have wrong? I don't know. If I knew I would fix it.
Fiction in - fiction out. If you base your belief system on fiction you will never get to reality.
The reason there are so many religions that have very different claims as to what is real is because there is a huge difference between the factual assumptions from which they were formed and the principles that they commit to that are based on those assumptions. The reason we have so many religions is because there are so many fictional narratives out there that these religions are based on. Some of these fictional narratives have spawned thousands of religions based upon different interpretations of the fictional narrative or different and conflicting version of the fictional narrative. Many religions include a mix of cultural tradition and fictional narrative or combine narratives from multiple religions. If you start with fiction as the basis for your view of reality then you are going to get fiction for the result.
Fiction based religions are based upon the holy books. The sacred texts are written under the evince inspiration of the omnipotent beings that are referenced in the text. Generally the omnipotent being inspires an autobiography of itself and the set of rules that the omnipotent being demands be followed. These rules are used to form the moral code of the religion and include the usual sacrifices that the omnipotent being imposes including everything from throwing virgins into volcanoes to a 10% tithe to be collected by the church. The reward for compliance is eternal life in paradise and the punishment for noncompliance is external torture in Hell. Talk about a carrot and a stick - Wow!
Relativism, or relative reality, is reality that is based on your initial assumptions. It can never be more accurate than the presumptions you start with.
The religious belief creates a lens through which reality is tested. If your basic assumptions are sound then when you build on those assumptions what you build is likely to be sound as well. If your basic assumptions are unsound then what you build on those assumptions are likely to be unsound as well. If a religion is based on reality then the belief system should return reality itself. It should return real reality. If however the religion is fiction based then it will return relative reality or reality as seen through the lens of the underlying fiction. So the real question becomes whether or not your foundation is reliable.
Blind faith is putting your trust in the untrustworthy. Blind faith is accepting or believing without question. Blind faith often involves believing in spite of the evidence. Everyone sort of knows what blind faith means. Blind faith is what all other religions believe in except your religion. You are one of the lucky ones who knows the truth and everyone who doesn't agree with you must be the victim of blind faith. But how do you know that one of them isn't right and you are the one who is blindly believing someone's bullshit?
Blind faith has some objective properties that can be tested to determine if the faith is in fact blind faith. This test doesn't determine if what you believe in is true or not. People who have earned faith often make mistakes. And, as the old saying goes, "Even a stopped clock is right twice a day." having said that, a trustworthy source is more likely to be right than an untrustworthy source. Thus from the point of view of a Realist, an earned faith source is a better bet for accurate information than a blind faith source.
So - what are the objective qualities of blind faith? Blind faith requires that you believe without evidence or proof. Sometimes blind faith requires that you believe in spite of the evidence. One of the properties of blind faith is that doubt and scrutiny are actually prohibited. The more strongly that doubt is prohibited, the more blind is the faith.
For example, many religions require you to believe in God. This is something that cannot be questioned. You must believe without any evidence that God exists. To question the existence of God is a sin and it is punishable by death. And death isn't the end of the punishment, it's just the beginning. You are condemned to fry in Hell forever. You are required to suspend all logic and reason in order to believe in God. In fact it is only by "faith" that you achieve salvation and eternal life in paradise. In this context, if you had "proof", then you wouldn't be believing in God on faith, which is why God allows Satan to create facts that point to God not existing so as to fool the non-believers.
Blind Faith prohibits proof, scrutiny, doubt, evidence, verification, or any process of accountability, making the correction of errors nearly impossible.
Without going into the issue of whether God exists or not, it is clear that the rules that require the belief in God are blind faith. Religion declares God to be outside of any type of doubt, scrutiny, or accountability. It is in the realm of the unquestionable. It has to be accepted without any sort of fact checking. And there is no method of correcting mistakes.
Anything that can not be questioned is assumed to be untrustworthy.
If information is placed in a classification where it is beyond question and scrutiny, then, as far as the Church of Reality is concerned, it is presumed to be untrue. We in the Church of Reality accept on "faith" that anything that is true should stand up to doubt. In fact the process of standing up to scrutiny is what makes what is true more credible. So if something is really real then why should debate be prohibited? Is your God so weak that his existence cannot be questioned? The official position of the Church of Reality is that anything than cannot be questioned is bullshit. If doubt is prohibited, then they are admitting that their claim can not stand the test of scrutiny.
“Orthodox Christians believe that Christ was a historical character. [However, he was] both supernatural and divine; and that the New Testament narratives, which purport to give a record of his life and teachings, contain nothing but infallible truth.” (This is generally know as the “literalist position.”)
"Conservative Rationalists, like Renan and the Unitarians, believe that Jesus of Nazareth is a historical character and that these narratives, eliminating the super-natural elements, which they regard as myths, give a fairly authentic account of his life.” (This is usually referred to as the “historical myth” position.)
"Many radical Freethinkers believe that Christ is a myth, of which Jesus of Nazareth is the basis, but that these narratives are so legendary and contradictory as to be almost if not wholly, unworthy of credit.” In other words, there was most likely a historical Jesus, but virtually all of the stories about him are mythical. (This is known as the “philosophical myth” position.) My added comment would be that in the intervening years between 1909 and now, this position would no longer be considered at all “radical,” and the Unitarians referred to in position 2, above, have shifted almost entirely to this third perspective.
“Other [‘more radical’ is implied here] Freethinkers believe that Jesus Christ is a pure myth—that he never had an [historic] existence, except as a Messianic idea, or an imaginary solar deity.” I would add here that a natural concomitant of this position is that the four canonical gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are entirely fictional—made up stories, no parts of which have any basis in reality whatsoever. (This is the “pure-myth” position.)
Here's something to think about for all you Atheists out there. Atheism is technically defined as not believing in God. God doesn't exist. God isn't real. But - people ask - what do you believe in?
Many Atheists have a problem answering that question in behalf of Atheism because Atheism is what you don't believe in - not what you do believe in. But when you think about it when you say that God doesn't exist then you are making a statement about God in relation to reality. For the statement to mean anything - reality must exist.
My point is - I think that one can safely say that Atheists believe in what's real, and that if an Atheist is asked, "What do you believe in?" that Reality is a correct answer. After all - if you don't admit that you do believe in reality, then the statement that God isn't real doesn't mean anything.
Atheists are really realists. Am I not right?
So - why am I making a big deal of this point? Some Atheists are interested in more than just the issue of not believing in God. They want to spread the word because they are frustrated by being surrounded by religious insanity. But Atheism isn't a religion and if you are comparing religions to Atheists you're comparing two different things. The Atheist "package" doesn't include community or a context for establishing right and wrong. Many Atheists embrace Humanism to fill in those gaps to some extent. Other Atheists are quite happy with the narrow mission of not believing in God and don't want anything more because Atheists tend to not join groups.
But - for those who see other religions as scary in the context of Christians who see nuclear war as bringing Jesus back or Muslim terrorists with nukes, we see a need to put together a more complete package and compete in the marketplace of religious choice. We think that of all the religions there are to choose from that Reality should be one of those choices. And to be pro reality is more attractive than just being anti-god, which is how Atheists are perceived.
I believe that embracing reality is the next logical step if you want to go beyond what isn't real and start focusing on what is real. So I am inviting Atheists to accept that Atheism is a pro-reality position and declaring that reality is what you do believe in.
I see Atheism and Humanism and several others as being part of a reality movement. The logical conclusion of the dream that if everyone in the world became an Atheist today, then what do we do? How do we live? What do we do with all those empty church buildings? How do we build community? How do we determine right and wrong?
We feel free to challenge other religion on what they believe. We say things like, "If the universe is only 7000 years old then why can we see stars farther than 7000 light years away?" But they challenge us too and many of their challenges are totally legitimate questions. For example, "If this life is all there is then why not be totally selfish? Without the promise of Heaven and the threat of Hell, why should anyone behave? And without God telling you what to do, what does behave even mean?" These are legitimate questions and they deserve well thought out responses that can stand the test of scrutiny.
Once one enters the religious debate then everything is on the table. On what basis can we challenge others to answer our questions and then respond that Atheism is limited to only the non-belief in God. I suppose this is fine if you aren't an activist, but if you are an Atheist with a mission you have to have something to put on the table to replace what you're taking off. And to do that you need to go beyond what you don't believe in and talk about what you do believe in, which I will assume is reality.
This Church of Reality is an open source religion. We are attempting what many people consider to be impossible, to create a reality based religion. It seems to me that if we are here on this planet and we are on our own then we better sit down and figure it out. We invite you to join in and participate with us.
Are cults just for weak-minded losers? Why would "normal" people join a cult? The answer is that one of the greatest strengths of humanity is also one of our greatest weaknesses. What makes humanity dominant on this planet is our ability to share knowledge. Because we can communicate, information learned by one individual is passed on to others. We have organized into societies that are so complex that only a fraction of the information that we rely on is actually stored in our own brains. The up side is that it allows us to benefit from the tremendous wealth of combined knowledge of the human race. The down side is that it is a serious security hole in the human computer. If the information we rely on is flawed, then we can end up living a life of illusion and deception.
Examples of groups that have some cult properties include religions, nations, political parties, corporations, nonprofit organizations, sport team fans, neighborhood associations, bridge clubs, softball teams, online discussion boards, Macintosh users, bike clubs, and vegans. Not to say that you should quit all these groups but that all of them will be to some extent at least benignly cultish.
Technically, any group that you are a member of has cult like properties. Most cults in this context are harmless. The very nature of a group is that you trust other people. You rely on them and they rely on you. The group creates a social order where leaders lead and followers follow. It might be democratic or hierarchical. But you trust them and they trust you. The group becomes it's own entity. Almost like it has a life force of it's own.
In a healthy group, people are ethical and responsible with each other. The relationships are based on a sane and productive system and the focus of the group is something worthwhile. People are trusted because they are trustworthy. People have faith in each other and the group because people have earned faith through being responsible. This keeps the down side to groups to a minimum. Even in the best of circumstances there are mistakes made and it takes hard work to keep things on course.
The human need to be part of a group is far stronger than logic. Most people will sacrifice logic for social acceptance.
People survive through groups. We need to connect to society. We need to become a productive member of the community to feel good about ourselves. This is a built-in instinctive need and it is very strong. Logic isn't as strong as our need to be accepted in a community. And because it is a strong need, people who are unethical can exploit that and enslave you in a cult.
A cult is a group gone bad. It is a group that uses what would otherwise be a normal group process for the purpose of exploiting and enslaving the members for some unethical purpose, generally involving money and power. People who have a need to belong to something are suckered in and allow themselves to be reprogrammed by the group mind. They are required to accept a lot of bad information on faith and once they accept that then they see reality relative to the bad information they are working with. Groups can start out good but degenerate into a cult because of a takeover of some unethical person who exploits the group for personal gain.
So the reason people join cults is that people need to organize as groups for a normal healthy society. But there are good groups and bad groups and a lot of groups that are somewhere in between. When people become part of the group they put their faith and trust in the group and the group information becomes part of who they are and what they believe. The individual starts seeing reality through the lens of the group and if the group is based on fiction, then the group members will see the world relative to the fiction.
If it's real - we believe in it. The name defines the religion. The Church of Reality is a Personal Commitment to the Truth. We believe in real reality, not the way we want reality to be, not our personal reality, but real objective reality the way it really is. We Realists are explorers and we explore the universe together with our minds. We think about thinking. We wonder about wondering. We attempt to understand the Understanding of Understanding. We ponder the Great Questions. We are a curious people and we are bound together in our quest to know the real world that we really live in.
Does reality have miraculous healing powers? Will it make you richer? Will it help you live longer? Actually, yes it will. People who think about reality make better decisions than people who turn their back on reality. A religious person might waste more money gambling, for example counting on supernatural powers to tip the odds in their favor in spite of the fact that people of faith and Atheists win and lose the same at games of pure chance. A realist on the other hand would more likely choose not to gamble because they understand that the odds favor the house.
People of faith are more easily scammed than Realists. That's because their religion requires the suppression of critical thinking. This makes them vulnerable to scams by people who are in their faith based circle or people pretending to be in their circle. People of faith are more likely to send their children to die in faith based wars believing that they are sacrificing for a noble cause. A Realist will first test to see if the cause is truly noble before sacrificing their life and the lives of their families.
Realists live better lives because reality based thinking leads to better decisions on average than thinking that relies on fiction.
When making medical decisions a Realist is going to rely on science to find a cure. A person of faith might turn to ritualism instead. They might also refuse blood transfusions or other common medical cures because it conflicts with their faith. Not every Realist lives a better life than people of faith. Many faith based religions provide community and community is good for people if it is a healthy community. Many Realists are less community oriented and their independence is often a big factor in becoming a Realist in the first place. It is often said in the Atheist community that, "Atheists aren't joiners." But perhaps this church can create the kind of community that everyone can feel comfortable being a part of. In fact it's something we must do.
So a Realist has the advantage that by making reality the focus of their belief system they tend to make better choices than people who shun reality. Better choices tend to make you happier, healthier, and wealthier. Realism doesn't have a fake afterlife to offer you but the only restrictions on sex is that you should use good judgement to avoid unintended pregnancies and the spread of disease. Being a freedom based religion we offer more sexual options than those who require virgin marriage monogamy. Sex is a good thing in our religion.
The word Reality does have healing powers. Every time you say "reality", the Sacred Message, you cause people to think about reality. And every time you think about reality it regenerates your mind making you a better person.
The most important thing about Realism is the quality of life issue. Reality gives you the freedom to be you. It allows you to live the life you choose. It allows you to accomplish great things. There is nothing in the world like being free. Free to think anything you want. Free to explore the universe with your mind. Your life is your own. Your thought are your thoughts. You are not forced to think only what you are allowed to think. You are not forced to live the life of a slave. You are not forced to live someone else's life, to be their puppet. In the Church of Reality you can be you and add your distinctiveness to the Tree of Knowledge and be remembers for who you are.
Some religions believe that personal freedom breeds immorality. They feel that if people can do whatever they want to, that they will choose a life of sin and debauchery. They believe that without strong rules and punishment that society will break down into anarchy. They believe that everyone will follow their selfish desires without a care as to how it affects the people around them. They believe that it is religion that holds society together and without God society will cease to exist. They believe that people need the reward of Heaven and the fear of Hell to keep them in line. But is this true? Does society come from religion? Does law come from holy books? Will there be anarchy without a belief in God?
We in the Church of Reality don't think so. The reality is that Atheists are as law abiding productive members of society as believers are. Atheists are every bit as honest and moral as religious people. Atheists are perhaps even more moral in real terms that people of faith. Although I'm sure there are people of faith who would disagree with that, they would have to admit that in general that the Atheists who are their friends and neighbors are normal law abiding people. So why is that? Why is it that Atheists aren't all criminals? Why are Atheists good citizens? Why are Atheists generous? Why is there not statistical advantage in being a believer when it comes to social behavior?
The reason that Atheists are law abiding productive members of society is because social structure is part of human evolution.
The reason is because good social behavior is a result of evolution. People are born to be good productive members of society. In the survival of the fittest game, humans rose to the top by their ability to create a mental network of information called the Tree of Knowledge and to organize into societies. We are programmed to speak a language and to listen to language. And language has but a single purpose, to communicate with other people. In order to work together, we have to get along with each other. In order to be safe and respected, we have to not be threatening and show respect to others. We are all here together and on an instinctive level we all understand that. So the reason that Atheists and secular societies don't degenerate into anarchy is because we have an evolved civilization. It is good for people in the real world, without the promises and threats from God, to be good moral people.
Humanism is the science of building a society around the natural laws of a good society. It is the exploration of secular social structure. It is society based on reality. We in the Church of Reality have adopted Secular Humanism as our model for social standards. We put a high importance on personal freedom as well because we are not a monolithic society and it is often our differences and diversity of beliefs that leads to the progress of social evolution. Although a free society might have some greater conflicts in some ways than a monolithic social structure, and it might have a complex social order, it has the advantages of diversity that leads to social evolution and innovation.
Social evolution is a major part of the evolution of the human race. In fact it is the part that is predominate. Physically we are evolving slowly, but socially we are evolving very quickly. We are evolving through the Tree of Knowledge and social technology is a big part of that. Society is made up of lots of individuals. A monolithic society is a society of individuals who are all very similar, often forced to be similar. Because of that, you don't get the diversity of thought that you get in a free culture. If people are punished for being innovative, then they stop being innovative. They just live year to year, century to century, and no significant progress is made. Some people think that is just fine. I suppose that if we already achieved a perfect society and wanted to preserve it, then I might agree, but that hasn't happened.
A free society is necessary for social progress. Social progress is necessary for positive evolution. Positive evolution is necessary for the exploration of reality.
The Church of Reality embraces Positive Evolution. We choose to move forward into a better future. In order to do that we need people to think "outside the box". And in order to get people to think outside the box, we have to allow for individual freedom. People have to be allowed to explore, to try new things, and to make mistakes. This cultural diversity does create some social conflicts, but it is the process of social conflicts and diversity of opinions that lead to social innovation and progress. Our moral truths are purified through scrutiny which allows us to correct mistakes. And new ideas that turn out to be good ideas help enrich the culture for everyone. The gains are worth the price.
Cultural diversity and individual freedom are to social evolution what genetic diversity is to biological evolution. In a restrictive culture, the society suffers from cultural inbreeding and becomes stagnant. They blindly keep making the same mistakes year after year and generation after generation. The Church of Reality is based on growth and our Principle of Freedom is based not only on a sense of fairness, but on our resolve to progress to a better tomorrow. Freedom is necessary to positive Evolution which is necessary for the exploration of reality the way it really is.
We in the Church of Reality challenge faith based religions to think through the issue of personal freedom and ask themselves if a diversity of opinion would help your culture. As a realist I can say for a fact that a huge amount of the doctrine of the Church of Reality is inspired by believers on issues that we both agree with and issues that we disagree with. The believer's perspective has greatly enriched our culture, and we hope to return the favor. We often learn more from people who we do not already agree with than people those we do agree with. Maybe we won't capture and enslave the Christians after all. Hmmmmm ....
Does the Church of Reality have a political goal? Sure we do. By making reality more important in people's lives we hope to help elect political leaders who are well grounded in reality. People who consider reality in making the decisions that affect all of us. We think the world will be better off if reality is part of the decision making process and we want politicians to have to express a commitment to reality when running for office.
We think the world would be better off if smart people were in charge.
The Church of Reality has a secret agenda of trying to get smart people elected to office who believe in reality and will teach Realism in the public schools.
People think of Atheists as selfish people. This is in part because a philosophy called Objectivism, which is atheistic, extols greed as a virtue and selflessness as evil. Communism didn't do Atheists any good either. But the other part of why Atheists are considered selfish is the belief that if you have God, that God will make you generous. God makes you generous because when his holy spirit merges into you you become divinely inspired to be a good person. Alternatively, for those who don't hear the "Word of God" clearly in their heart you have the reward of eternal life in paradise vs. eternal punishment in Hell. Quite the carrot and stick to get people to fork over some bucks to the poor. So - it's easy to see why Theists would want to be generous and selfless. And many believers believe that without a God that there is no reason to be good and therefore there's nothing stopping Atheists from being evil. Or is there?
For those of you who know an Atheist personally, you'll probably notice that these people are not really any different that Theists in the way they live. They don't eat their children. They tend to obey the laws and are good upstanding members of society. They donate money to feed the starving children, they attend PTA meetings and they are honest hard-working productive members of society. But how can that be without the promise of eternal life or the threat of punishment? Why can these people be good without God?
Atheism and Altruism are a good fit because selflessness achieves our selfish goal of survival and help us thrive as a community.
Interestingly enough, the same can be asked of Christians. When you take "forgiveness of sins" and that you are saved by faith and not by works, we Atheists see that as a giant loophole in the rule book. The simple view is that a Christian can get away with anything because Jesus died and bought them a ticket to eternal life so they can now get away with anything as long as they have faith and keep getting forgiven. One could even argue that if you don't sin, then Jesus died for nothing and that sin honors his sacrifice. But in spite of forgiveness and grace, for some odd reason, Christians tend to behave themselves. Even the ones from "those denominations" that you know are probably going to Hell anyhow. (Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Catholics, etc.) So why is it that believers behave themselves?
As I stated in the last chapter, it is human nature to give. It is human nature to need to be an upstanding member of society. We are biologically programmed to form groups and work together. It is the way we are. Altruism is something that evolved that has become key to our very survival. It is as natural as eating, breathing, fear, sex, and everything else we do to survive. So in spite of what the Objectivists say, Atheists are as normal and as generous and live a life that is not that different than believers. Other than perhaps having more tattoos and more free sex, we are just like everyone else. We are normal people just like you are.
If religion goes away, if tomorrow there were no believers, society would not degenerate into selfish anarchy. Morality would not go away. We wouldn't become a lawless culture. Right and wrong would still exist. Why? Because these are things that are necessary for survival. So believers need not fear that an Atheistic society is going to bring down humanity. If God doesn't exist and Realism took over the culture, all the good stuff stays. People will still live in peace and harmony, love each other, take care of each other, and be generous. In fact one could say Atheist generosity is more generous than Christian generosity because we don't have a selfish reason that compels us to be generous. We just do it out of the natural goodness of our hearts.
Believers tend to believe that "man has an evil nature" and by default we are of sin. And it is only from God that goodness originates. But that just isn't so because people who are godless are just as good (if not better) than those who believe. In reality, humanity has a predominately good nature, but not always. Some people are selfish and take more than their share. A lot of people's behavior is learned, so if we teach our children what is right, then they will tend to grow up doing the right thing. Most everyone wants to do what is right whether you are a Theist or an Atheist. We just don't always agree on what that is.
We in the Church of Reality however, state to the rest of society that we choose to be good moral upstanding citizens and that we want all the good things that believers want. And we commit to a reality-based method for determining what that is and we think that reality is something that is safe enough that a believer doesn't have to worry about moving in next door to a realist. If you read our Sacred Principles and what our religion is about, you will see that if we stick with what we say we are, that we are no threat to civilization. There is a reason for Atheists being altruistic and we in the Church of Reality embrace it.
Just because people might disagree doesn't mean they can't work together for a good common outcome. Again, taking San Francisco Bay area culture as an example, you have a culturally diverse population, but you also have the highest density of not for profit organizations than in any other area in the world. Why is it that there are so many organizations in this area? Is it a coincidence or is there a relationship? Are these groups just small clusters of like-minded people, or are there other factors at play here? What is there for us to learn?
Because the population is intellectually diverse, people learn to work with and appreciate people who are not like minded. When you learn how to work with people whom you don't agree with, there are a lot more people who are compatible with you than if you are intolerant. In contrast, a monoculture expects everyone to be the same and even small differences of opinion lead to people deciding that they can't work with other people who believe almost the same thing. That's one reason there are thousands of flavors of Christians, even though they all have the same book as their source. In fact that's one of the pitfalls of faith-based religion. Everyone has to agree on the fiction.
Diversity increases cooperation because it creates a culture of respect and acceptance for people who are different, allowing a greater number of people to function collectively.
.
So because you have intellectual diversity and you have acceptance of intellectual diversity, people can come together collectively to accomplish a common goal. Jews and Palestinians march together to end the violence. Christians and Satanists work together to feed the homeless. And because there is diversity, there is a broader base of resources and ideas to call upon to bring together to get the job done. There's probably going to be more strong opinions, shouting, name calling, and other behavior before a consensus is reached as compared to the Moonies, but once a decision is made, it's more likely going to be a better decision because it has been put to the test of scrutiny and doubt and has survived on the strength of it's own merits.
We in the Church of Reality aspire to be intellectually diverse. We don't agree among ourselves on a lot of things. In fact a high percentage of Realists think it's a mistake to degrade reality itself by calling it a religion. And - quite frankly - they have a point. But it is part of our religious identity and our religious culture to not agree with each other. We debate things out in order to attempt to come to agreement on some things, but there's always plenty of new stuff that we realists will always be arguing about. But that isn't a liability, it's an asset. It's what gives us our strength. We like disagreement. Sometimes we get our way and sometimes we don't. Like everyone, we make mistakes. But unlike everyone, we have a process of fixing our mistakes and a commitment to do so.
Disagreement can be a good thing. Being disagreeable - not so much.
We Realists take pride in being innovative. When someone tells us that something can't be done, we find a way to make it work. The word "impossible" means the same as "challenge" to us. When they say, "There are no easy solutions.", we respond, "Then you're just not trying hard enough!" We are united as one but we celebrate our differences and draw strength from our diversity. We don't want to be all alike. We do not strive to become a monoculture. We like being weird people. And we like working with other people who are not like us.
The Philosophy of the Open Hand includes learning how to work with people who you have differences with.
The Philosophy of the Open Hand includes being accepting of people who don't agree with you, even people who sometimes drive you nuts to deal with. Some of the best ideas and inspirations for the Church of Reality came from discussions with Christians. Some times they get it right. Sometimes they just inspire me to think things through. The Objectivists inspired this topic in claiming that Altruism and individualism are mutually exclusive. They are dead wrong, but it got me thinking about how collectivism might be construed as anti-individualism. So we can't go out and gas all the Christians because without believers who will set an example of what not to do?
We are one planet, we are all here together, and we not only have to figure out how to get along, but to make our differences an advantage rather than a liability. Our Principle of Peace isn't based on the idea that we have a forced peace, that we all really hate each other, but agree not to do anything about it. Nor do we envision a peace that is achieved by a world wide uniculture. We see peace in terms of using our differences to our mutual advantage which preserves our individual freedom and privacy yet creates a culture where people of diverse backgrounds can come together collectively and accomplish great things and we all get what we want. Well - except for the Extinctionists. Sorry guys, we just can't let that happen.
I SAW DARWIN
(SING TO TUNE OF “I Saw the Light” )
I wondered where life could have begun
I couldn’t believe in any magical one
Then I came upon a theory to muse
Praise Darwin - he saw the clues!
I began to think! I began to think!
All of the facts they started to link
Now I’m so happy - reality to use
Praise Darwin - he saw the clues!
Just like a fool I wondered alone
Without reality my grasp was almost gone
Then I found reality was there for me to choose
Praise Darwin - he saw the clues!
Now that I know what’s real and I see
All of the wonder that surrounds me
I am so happy and I’m spreading the news
Praise Darwin - he saw the clues!
by Gena Hendrix
Faith and science do not coexist very well because science by definition is proof based where faith by definition prohibits proof. In the world of science what is true and what is false are separated by testing and scrutiny. What stands up to scrutiny becomes true. What fails to stand up becomes false. People make mistakes and mistakes get corrected and truth is purified through what is basically an evolutionary process, the survival of that which passes constant inspection.
The problem with faith is that there is no way of testing to determine if what you have faith in is actually true.
The problem with faith is that it's blasphemy to question what you are supposed to accept without proof. You are expected to accept a set of assertions based on bare claims of truth without any means of verifying if the claims are in fact true. And if any of the claims actually are false, then there's no way to correct that. The only thing you can do is pray that what you are believing in is actually true. But even that doesn't work because you have tens of thousands of religions that believe opposite things, and that's the one thing that most every one of them have in common. God confirms them all as true. About the only religion that God hasn't confirmed as true is this church, the Church of Reality.
The Church of Reality is one of the only religions that God hasn't endorsed.
If people of faith had a consistent message from religion to religion, or believer to believer within the same religion, and God was telling everyone the same thing, then that might indicate there was a real source behind this faith. But what we in the Church of Reality see happening is that people make up stories and sucker gullible people into believing it. If you are a person of faith you can see this happening too. Every other religion except yours does it. Any believer can quickly see how other religions are deceiving their faithful. So by what test does one judge one's own religion to assert that your religion is more real than the other person's religion. The truth is - there is none.
Of course there are those who think that God talks to them directly and that's how they know their faith is real. They have had a supernatural experience where God confirmed to them personally what they believe in is true. They "know it in their heart" and have no doubts about it now. But - that too has a problem. People of other religions who believe the opposite of what you believe have had the same personal experience with God. From the outside it appears that God will confirm anything you believe in and everyone who claims divine personal communication with God seems equally credible.
God tells Christians to kill Muslims. God tells Muslims to kill Christians. Why can't God make up his mind?
So - is God telling people different things or are some of these people experiencing something that they think is God talking that really isn't? What if they are just imagining that they are talking to God, or rather God is talking to them? Or - for those who believe in God and Satan, how do you know that Satan isn't pretending to be God and fooling you? What objective test separates those who really hear God from those who think they hear God, but don't really?
Lets say, for example, you are a believer and you have personally heard the word of God and you have a personal relationship with Jesus. However, as you are aware, there are a lot of weird religions out there who's members claim the exact same kind of relationship with God and Jesus that you have, but obviously that's a problem because they believe in things you know aren't true. So somehow their experience with hearing the voice of God must be false. But they would claim that their relationship is real and yours is false. So - how do you objectively determine using faith and not science, that you are right and they are wrong? I challenge any believer to come up with a method, apply the method, and tell me which one is the true religion.
Nudity in the Church of Reality is also a choice that we find acceptable. If you are in a place where others are publicly naked then there is no problem at all. We believe it's good to get a little sunlight on the skin. So we approve of nudity where public nudity is accepted.
However, in cases where you are the only one naked in a social setting, then Realists should use common sense and pay attention to local laws and use wisdom and social discretion.
The Church of Reality in general discourages the illegal use of drugs. If a drug is illegal there is often, but not always, good reason for it. Having said that Marijuana is a notable exception.
Sometimes drugs are made illegal for political reasons. Regardless, with any illegal drug there is the issue of getting caught and whether the cost of getting caught is worth the benefits of doing the drug. In many cases it is not. In some jurisdictions some drugs are illegal but not enforced. Some countries will execute you for smoking a joint.
As with legal drugs the Church of Reality urges realists to be smart. Always fully understand the effects of the drug you are using and the proper doses, side effects, and anything else that might lead to a decision that you will regret. As always, wisdom is required and one should really think things through when using any substance whether legal or not.
Abortions should be performed as early in the pregnancy as possible with the burden to abort getting higher as the viability of the fetus develops. While the Church of Reality supports abortion for any reason in the early stages, as the time of birth approaches the fetus gets deep within the fuzzy line of live birth. The Church of Reality only supports late term abortion if it is medically necessary, and we leave it to medical experts to resolve what that constitutes.
Religion evolved as a result of our evolution. As humans began to talk and to wonder about our existence and the world we live in, people started to theorize about reality. In the beginning religion was an early attempt at science and to create order in society. Religions evolved into social institutions creating a conglomeration of ritual, science, law, and government.
People didn't always know we live on a planet. They saw the sun and the moon and the stars and wandering stars that we now know are planets. There were storms, thunder and lightning, hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods. There were good years of plenty and bad years of famine and drought. Insects ate crops. People died of mysterious diseases. The world was a vast and mysterious place that created great wonderment and inspired the imagination, and the imagination went wild.
With no scientific information to work with, people imagined that there were Gods that were good and evil and that they were powerful and controlled the universe. The sun and moon were gods. The thunder being brought the rains. Life was everywhere so people concluded that stars and planets and the sun and moon might also be alive. They wondered about beings that live in the clouds. They wondered about what happens to you after you die, or where you were before you were born.
Integrity is the foundation of the Church of Reality. We are a religion that is built on the rock of truth. As long as we stay true then our religion will be able to stand the test of time and evolve forward. Truth is the rock that makes our religion solid. Other religions are based on fiction. Someone made up a story and people to this day still believe the story. But the fiction isn't based on something that is real so the foundations of other religions move around. Who is to say that one version of fiction is better than another version of fiction? Reality on the other hand isn't going away. No matter what humanity does, reality will still be there. The Earth will still continue to orbit around the Sun for another 4 billion years.
What is amazing about creating doctrine for the Church of Reality is the way it all fits together as it evolves forward. A new idea is discovered and it fits in well with existing doctrine. We add this section on Honesty and nothing that is already here contradicts it. If any rewriting has to be done it's to enhance other principles to make them deeper and more meaningful. Perhaps the fact that everything fits together so well is an indicator that we are on the right track.
Much of the reasoning for execution is based on our worldview of justice: "An eye for and eye, a tooth for a tooth." If someone murders someone, then they should be killed. It sends a strong message to people contemplating murder that if you kill someone that you will pay for it with your own life. The argument that the death penalty isn't a deterrent to murder flies in the face of common sense. Of all the people who have been executed, none of them have ever murdered again. There is debate as to how much it helps the families of victims but the idea of erasing brutal killers from existence does have appeal especially for very gruesome murders. Some people believe that being against the death penalty is an indicator of weakness in not facing up to what really needs to be done. The arguments in favor of the death penalty do have merit. This is what makes the issue difficult and why it requires some deep thinking to make the best choice.
The short answer is no. The long answer is - if he comes out of hiding we will believe in him. As long as he remains the invisible guy in the sky - he doesn't meet the objective reality test. The longer answer can be found on our Does God Exist page.
An important point is that the term "God" doesn't refer to a single entity. There are thousands of gods out there and every individual has their own personal conception of God based on their own imagination. So even if the Church of Reality was to decide to accept a deity, we would have to identify which one is real out of millions of choices. So we are going to have to wait till a deity steps forward and identifies itself.
Aren't you afraid you are going to burn in Hell forever if you are wrong?
Nope - not at all. But I would be more afraid if I were a Theist. After all - what if you picked the wrong religion? Maybe the Muslims are right. Maybe the Mormons are right. What if it's the Jehovah's Witnesses. We believe in what's real. Burning in Hell forever over a mistaken opinion clearly isn't. Aren't you afraid of wasting your life believing in fiction if you are wrong? What would scare me more is that if this is our entire existence, maybe 75 years and then we are gone, I wouldn't want to waste it all worshiping a fictional deity.
Do you believe in an after life?
Officially - the Church of Reality does not believe in an afterlife or pre life. If it is ever proven that there is an afterlife - we will believe in it. However - part of who we are survives in the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of all human understanding. You might be remembered positively for something you accomplished or contributed - or negatively for something terrible you did - or - you might not be remembered at all. You might end up being forgotten. After the last person who knew you personally has died - will anyone remember you? Have you accomplished anything or contributed anything worth remembering?
For example - Albert Einstein is still with us because he contributed Relativity to the Tree. The "guy who invented the wheel" is still with us. The only afterlife that we know for sure is if we are remembered or if we accomplish something that becomes part of the Tree of Knowledge. In the Church of Reality - if you want an afterlife - you have to earn it.
What about punishment?
If you turn your back on reality - you will be punished! Seriously though - people who take reality into consideration in their daily lives tend to make better decisions giving them access to opportunities and avoiding the pitfalls of those who turn their back on the real world. Reality can make your life better.
Do you worship anything or anyone?
Not really. However - there are some things we hold as sacred and holy. We consider the Tree of Knowledge to be something that is holy to us. When we use the terms sacred and holy - it's because it is part of our lives and our commitment to the truth. We also consider Mother Earth to be sacred because this is where we evolved and we are dependent on it for our survival.
But - we don't worship anything - pray to anyone - or fear the wrath of deities striking us down for failing to worship them.
Do you believe in a higher intelligence?
Not in the form of a deity. But the human race is interconnected through the Tree of Knowledge and we function as if humanity itself were a super organism that we are all a part of. In that respect humanity could be considered to be a superior being to us individually.
A Realist can be a member of the Church of Reality and a member of another religion at the same time. We don't requires exclusivity in order to be a Realist. There are other religions that are reality compatible religion. They are reality based or reality friendly. One such religion are the Unitarian Universalists who are accepting of all religions and a Realist can thrive in a Unitarian church while maintaining their commitment to reality. Some people have marital or cultural ties to other churches yet still believe in reality. In the Church of Reality we are happy if you can be a part-time Realist because some reality is better than none. Even if a person only thinks about reality for one minute a day they are still a Realist and are as entitled to the right to practice their religion as anyone else.
For those of you who have some money and you want to help, one thing you can do is to buy some advertising space on popular web sites to promote the Church of Reality. There're a lot of sites that have very good deals. The best sites to buy ads on are sites that are related. You want to go to sites where people hang out who might be interested in reality. Then you buy ad space and link it back to us. This not only helps us, but generates a little income for the site you buy ad space on. If it's a progressive web site, you are helping two causes at the same time.
Different religions have different world views and our world view is Reality. We want to inject reality into the political process. Reality is our Sacred message. We want our leaders to take reality into account when making decisions that affect all of us. We want to make reality important in society. We want our science classes to teach our children about reality. We want people who propose projects to ask, "is this really going to work?" We want real solutions to real problems. We are a culture of thinkers who are not satisfied with sound-bite politics. We want to see a plan and we want the plan to be a realistic plan. We want our nation states to make sense. So as realists we take a position, as a church and as individuals, to influence nation states toward real solutions to real problems.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Some people are confused about the relationship between the Church of Reality and Unitarian Universalists. People ask, "The Unitarians don't believe in anything, including reality. If a Realist joined a Unitarian church doesn't that lower our standards?"
Actually no, because to be a Unitarian is to be a member of a dual religion. They have no creed so that everyone in the Church can believe whatever they want. Individuals can have strongly held beliefs, like being a Realist in addition to being a member of a Unitarian community. What Unitarians are into is community. They are especially into creating community across religious boundaries. So a person can be fully Realist and be in community with people who are not Realists. It doesn't weaken your position on reality, in fact it strengthens it because you are in an environment that will keep you thinking when people discuss their beliefs.
Part of the mission of the Church of Reality is to reach out to other people and be part of not only our own evolution but the evolution of other religions. We can't do that if we become isolated. It is good for us and it is good for them if Realists form community bonds with other people. Unitarians do allow for subcultures to form within their churches so that Atheists can get together by themselves and Christians can get together, etc. But Unitarianism creates a more expansive view of the concept of what the word "us" means. They are a living example that reflects our Sacred Principle of Inclusiveness and they are more inclusive than we would probably be. So since church is about community and inclusiveness, then we should do it the best we can. Why reinvent the wheel when the Unitarians have already accomplished what we dream to be?
The Church of Reality might some day have its own churches. But for now let us learn from the Unitarians and see how that works out. This is good for us in this stage of our evolution.
One of our Sacred Principles is our Principle of Humility. The Principle of Humility is very important to us because it puts us in our place and reminds us of the dangers of self importance. The Principle of Humility is in part a message that the Church of Reality sends to itself. It reminds us that we, as an organization, exist only for the purpose of serving the membership and to advance the interests of humanity and for no other reason. We are a people who strongly value humility and to be coerced by the State to perform an act of self praise is an act against one of our core beliefs and violates our religious liberties. Since we are religiously prohibited from praising our own religion in such a manner, to be required to praise the State is to make us affirm that the State is more important than our deeply held religious beliefs.
Rarely is a person likely to instantly convert from a strongly theistic religion to Realism. Perhaps if they just had a traumatic experience where they were really burned by a religion and just realized that what they thought was real was fiction, then they might be ready to instantly embrace reality. But if people are comfortable in their beliefs and they are socially integrated into their religious culture, then there's no strong motivation to accept reality. Some people will even admit that. They will tell you that it doesn't matter if it's real or not as long as it makes them happy.
What we have to offer is reality the way it really is. It may not seem as robust as the world of fantasy but it is real, and I think that if reality is fully explored that it is as robust if not more so that the world of fiction. Certainly it is more robust than the fictions that most religions are offering today.
We are not owned by the government. We are not subjects and government property. Government exists solely for the purpose of serving the people and for no other reason. Any government that thinks otherwise is out of bounds and is exceeding it's authority mandated by the people. The people are not given rights and liberties by the government. The people are humanity and we have intrinsic rights and liberties that we acquired through evolution. Nation States are artificial human constructs that are designed to serve and not to rule us. We are a free people and we own ourselves. We are not owned by nations or kingdoms.
People have a mistaken idea that they have a duty to serve their country but the opposite is true. The country has a duty to serve the people. When realists come together to fight as a nation in a just war, we do so because we serve the people who we share a nation with. We fight for the freedom of the people. Many nation states think that they own their people. They think that the young men are property and that the nation state can assert an ownership right and enslave them to become mercenaries to the nation's cause regardless of if the cause is just or not. A Realist is not subject to these assertions because our lives are our own. We may choose to serve a national cause but we cannot be compelled to do so. We serve only if the cause is a just cause and only by our own choice.
Governments are artificial human constructs that exist for the sole purpost of serving the people and for no other reason. The government is always subservient to the people.
Realists avoid the reciting of pledges to artificially constructed entities such as nation-states or religions, including and especially our own. To pledge to a nation-state is to give up your self ownership to an artificial entity that is supposed to exist to serve the public. We assert the dominance of our self ownership over government by refusing to participate in government lead self worship. Instead, those who serve the public should be encouraged to say a pledge to the people for whom they serve and to express hope that they will do a good job as a trusted servant of the public.
Governments that work right are a valuable resource to the people for whom they serve. Humanity has both individual and collective elements and it is the balance of the two that makes for an ideal society. Each entity must know and respect the place of the other. Personal freedom is reserved for the individual and should not be intruded upon unless there is a compelling state interest to do so. However, someone has to fill the pot holes and fix the roads that we all drive on and the right kind of government provides valuable resources to enhance the exploration of reality. So there is an important place for public education, social programs, law enforcement, taking care of the sick, the poor, and the elderly. There is value to public funding for the sciences for the purpose of the exploration of the universe that we live in.
Government crosses the line however when they limit out personal freedoms and abridge our right to control our lives. Examples of when the government crosses the line include:
Laws that prohibit women from having the same rights and privileges as men.
Laws that impose the values of one religion on another.
Government that recognizes fictional deities, or expresses a preference for one form of religion over another, or establishes a state religion.
Government that gets involved in leading prayer.
Government that oppresses people because of their sexual orientation.
Government that prohibits sex between consenting adults.
Government that demonizes or discriminates against Atheists.
Government that denies women birth control, or that denies them access to abortions, or in any other way forces them to bear children or not bear children against their will.
Government that denies death with dignity services, or government that would pressure the dying to kill themselves to save money.
Government that prohibits the legitimate and responsible use of mind altering substances for the purpose of obtaining religious insight and inspiring creative thinking.
Government that prohibits the individual from obtaining and using substances to treat medical conditions where the individual sincerely believes that the use of the prohibited substance has a medical benefit.
Government that puts itself or corporations ahead of the needs of the people.
We as Realists see good government as an extension of ourselves, so in owning ourselves we also own the governments that serve us. It is important for us not only to realize that, but to assert it whenever necessary. Government is like a small child who often gets out of place and exceeds it's boundaries. We have to make sure that we keep it disciplined so that it doesn't develop a habit of bad behavior and forget who is the master and who is the artificially constructed servant.
This article on Ignosticism comes from Wikipedia and does an excellent job of expressing the Position of the Church of Reality on God. We are focused on what does exist. What doesn't exist is unimportant to us.
Because God has no consistent definition we can't reach the question of existence.
Ignosticism is the view that the question of the existence of God is meaningless because it has no verifiable (or testable) consequences and should therefore be ignored. (See scientific method.) The term was coined by Rabbi Sherwin Wine, founder of the Society for Humanistic Judaism. Ignosticism is often considered synonymous with theological noncognitivism.
In the entry under "God" in the Guide to Humanistic Judaism, published by the Society for Humanistic Judaism, ignosticism is defined as "finding the question of God's existence meaningless because it has no verifiable consequences." This use of the term verifiable is consistent with the usage of logical positivism and indicates that the word "God" is meaningless because theism is incoherent. This doesn't have to imply, however, that the idea of God is emotionally or aesthetically meaningless. It is sufficient to say that the idea of God as a being makes no sense.
For most purposes, this view may be considered a form of agnosticism (sometimes referred to as "apathetic agnosticism"), and falls under the general category of nontheism. But it is a particular form. From this approach, the "I don't know" of agnosticism ceases to mean "I don't know if God exists or not" and becomes "I don't know what you're talking about when you talk about God." This underlies the form of the word: ignosticism, indicating an ignorance of what is meant by a claim of God's existence. Until this ignorance is cleared up, the ignostic is justified in ignoring putative arguments for or against.
So, when the word "God" is spoken, the ignostic may seek to determine if something like a child's definition of a god is meant or if a theologian's is intended.
A child's concept generally has a simple and coherent meaning: a big powerful man in the sky responsible for the weather and other such matters. The ignostic is probably atheistic toward this notion, regarding the balance of evidence to deem against it. In taking this view the ignostic is in agreement not only with all atheists but, ironically, with any serious modern theist.
A theologian's concept is more complex and abstract, often involving such concepts as first cause, sustainer, and unmoved mover and claiming such attributes for God as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. To the ignostic these abstractions, taken singly or in combination, cannot be said to be false; rather, they are muddled, self-contradictory, linguistically empty, or perhaps poetic. Hence, one cannot meaningfully expound on the existence or nonexistence of God.
The Church of Reality awaits the point when the Theistic world comes up with a consistent definition of God.
The consistent ignostic, therefore, requires a coherent definition of God (or of any other metaphysical concept to be discussed) before engaging in arguments for or against.
From an early age, as far back as I can remember, I seemed to be aware that I was in a fight to keep from being brainwashed. Somehow the idea that adults would break the spirits of children was something that I found horrifying. I can't tell you where it came from but it was a time when World War II had been recently won and the Nazis and the Communists were very much on the minds of everyone. It was the evil threat where we had freedom and they didn't and if they won we would become the slaves of the evil government and forced to become part of something terrible. Being raised Jewish I heard about the concentration camps and I saw Jewish adults with numbers tattooed on their arms who were in Hitler's camps. So it was Freedom vs. Communism and that was something I could relate to and I was clearly on the side of freedom.
But the way my desire for freedom manifested itself was not what most people would have predicted. I remember seeing children on television of communist countries and they were wearing uniforms and they were told what to think and forced to do state ordered rituals like marching and saluting and it was all depicted as the form of ultimate oppression. I understood that they were being brainwashed from childhood so that their humanity would be suppressed and they would become mindless drones who would do evil things because there are ordered to do it. So I knew I must never allow adults to do anything like that to me.
Then I would see the Catholic kids and like the Communists they were wearing uniforms, lined up and marching into class, and forced to perform mind altering rituals which included worshiping idols. So in my mind being Catholic was half way to being a Communist. So since the Jews were the victims of the Holocaust, the Jews had to be the good guys. But anything that looked like forced mind control was the roots of becoming a Nazi. And I would die before I became one of those!
My family was "different" from all other "normal" families in the neighborhood. In comparison we had a lot less money than people around us. So we couldn't afford the stuff other kids had like baseball and football equipment. So if you didn't have a glove you couldn't play baseball. So although I still did a lot of other things I was a semi-outcast. My parents fought a lot, screaming to the point where neighbors were calling the cops, and we were occasionally beaten, but never disciplined. I was sort of left out in the wild to raise myself and spent as much time outside as possible to avoid home life. And since other kids had to be home on a schedule I spent a lot of time alone which allowed me to spend a lot more time thinking than most kids did. And I had a lot more freedom than anyone else. Not that I was granted freedom, but my parents were to preoccupied to take freedom away from me.
Sunday mornings were especially interesting times for me. Everyone would go to church except for me. It was like I had the whole world to myself. Yes it was awkward for me to be "different" like I was out of place and that I somehow should be doing something like everyone else did, but it was a time of absolute freedom and meditation where I could wonder around and explore the world. I think this transformed me in a way that allowed me to form patterns of thought and an appreciation for independent thinking that most people never learn. It's something that I consider to be extremely valuable and defines who I am as a person. It forms what I would call the spiritual basis for what I envision for the Church of Reality.
The most important word for a teenager to learn is the word NO. (This is not limited to teens so everyone listen up here.) If we lived in a perfect world this wouldn't be as much of a problem as it is, but we live in a world where there are people who exploit and prey upon the weak and disadvantaged. Who are the weak and disadvantaged? For the purpose of this discussion, they include people who have a problem saying NO.
What do we mean by saying NO? NO is an easy word. It's just one syllable and two letters. One letter less than saying yes, but two letters more than saying nothing at all. And therein lies the problem. To some people if you don't say NO fast enough or hard enough they interpret it as saying yes. But the word NO is a very powerful word. It is probably the most important word in our language. NO tells people that you are someone and you refuse to go along. NO means that you will not allow yourself to be taken advantage of. NO means that you are not going to allow yourself to be passively controlled by others. NO means that you think for yourself. NO means that you own yourself. And owning yourself is an important concept in the Church of Reality.
NO is the word that starts revolutions. NO is the word that allows the oppressed to rise up. NO is the word that is the point where change occurs. When the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. started a revolution for the equality of people, the revolution started by saying NO. When Rosa Parks was told that she had to sit in the back of the bus she said NO and NO changed the world. Ghandi in India said NO and drove out British control. Nelson Mandela said NO and ended apartheid in South Africa. Susan B. Anthony said NO, that women will not be denied the right to vote, and she prevailed. No is the word of empowerment. NO is the word of leadership. NO allows us to look at who we are and what we are doing and decide who we are and what we will become. NO allows you to stand up for yourself, to defend your rights, and to assert who you are in the world. You can not own yourself until you own the word NO.
When you are a teenager there are people out there who would take advantage of you. Some are adults who want to molest you and some are your friends who want you to do things to fit in. There are people out there who are users who just look at you as a possible resource for whatever they want from you, who are looking for people with a weak NO to take advantage of. Sometimes they want you to participate in a group so as to self reinforce doing things that are wrong. Common things include drugs, sex, money, religious cults, and gangs, but it could be almost anything, and generally when you think about it, it's something that you know you shouldn't be involved in and there is just a lot of pressure. In fact any time people are pressuring you the pressure should alert you to think things through. Are you being pressured because it is the right thing to do and people are looking out for your best interest? Or are you being pressured because someone wants something from you that you don't want to be a part of? Sometimes it's not so easy to tell the difference.
NO often has a price. If you say NO, then they won't be your friend anymore. If you say NO, then you are un cool. If you say NO, then the person won't date you anymore. Sometimes they will threaten violence against you if you say NO. NO is not an easy word because it's easier in the short term to just go along to get along. But if you do that, then it forms a habit and you lose control of who you are and you can end up doing things that have consequences for the rest of your life. You can end up in jail, raising babies instead of going to school, seriously injured, drug addicted, or dead.
NO gives you the inner strength to control your life and make your own decisions for yourself. When you say NO then you reclaim who you are. You are telling the world that you own yourself. That you are a strong person. That you control your own destiny. That you care about your future. That you know that choices have consequences. That you are not going to be a drug addict. That you do not have to give in to other people's sexual needs when you don't want to have sex with them. That you are not going to be a gang member. That you will not wear a Burqa. That women have the same rights to self-determination as men. That you will not worship fictional deities. That you are not going to smoke cigarettes to fit in. It's your life. You own it. But you have to say NO to claim it.
To contemplate the universe is to understand everything that is real. All of it. How does it work? Where did it come from? From the smallest objects to the largest. It's math and science. It's physical reality. It includes things we can touch, things we can build. Why do birds fly towards the equator in the winter and how do they know how to get back?
We Realists are a curious people. We want to know everything. We want to know how it works. We want to take it apart and see what's inside. We wonder if we can make it better. We like to build things.
In response to today's ruling by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart the Church of Reality today reasserts several of our religious principles as to why we take strong exception to the decision of the court. These principles include:
A woman has a fundamental right to choose to terminate her pregnancy.
Everyone has a fundamental right to health and that the rights of the living take precedent over those of the unborn.
That women are fully equal to men in every way and that they are not subject to inferior social status as imposed by majority religions.
That medical decisions are a private affair and that they are between a patient and the doctor and are not to be used by the majority religions as a way of imposing its standards on people of other religions.
That our Principle of Compassion requires any of us who are doctors to disobey the law when the law puts the health of the patient at risk.
Laws created my the majority religions to enforce the values of their religion on members of other religions, impose a substantial government burden on our religion and violates our First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise of religion clause.
The Church of Reality is based upon the religious commitment to pursue the understanding of reality as it really is. In order to do that we have adopted a set of Sacred Principles which form the basis of our moral and ethical standards. In the darkness of space there is no right and wrong. Whatever happens is what happens. It is we as humans who invented right and wrong as a way of promoting what we consider to be in the interest of the greater good. Morality is based upon that which the community considers to be the overriding values of society from their religious perspective. Some follow the teaching of ancient texts with stories of deities that issued commandments and demanded blood sacrifices. Our religion puts value on the continued evolution of the human race and the quest for the understanding of our existence and our continued evolutionary progress.
Our values are based on the Principle of Inclusiveness and the Principle of Justice which make women and men 100% equal partners in the human experience. Women are not the property of men and men are not dominate over women. We don't recognize superior social position based on sex. We also value Self Ownership, that everyone owns their own life, makes their own choices, and takes Responsibility for their own choices. Even if the choice is wrong, it is your choice to make. We Respect each other's rights and we respect each other's Privacy. We see ourselves as all part of humanity and we are Compassionate towards individuals. We take care of each other. We keep each other healthy and relieve suffering.
We Realists live in a society that is dominated by theistic religions that worship a variety of invisible deities according to ancient texts that the believers follow without question. These texts give the male domination over the female. She is his property. She exists to serve then make and bear him sons. The deities are often cruel and demand blood scarifices and their standards are based on the idea that the deity sometimes causes suffering and that there is injustice in this life that the deity will make it up in a next life.
Because the majority religions controls the legislature, they are in a position to impose there values as if they were absolute truths. Sometimes they to this innocently, sometimes it is to appeal to the majority of voters who share these artificial values. In enacting these religious values into law, they appease the masses and they get reelected. Thus democracy creates laws that tend to impose the majority religions on the minority.
An example of this includes slavery. That black people are 60% as valuable as white people. It took America 150 years to figure out that women were people. Women weren't allowed to vote and were considered not much more than property. That's because the laws reflected the role of women as depicted in their religion. America however has moved away from that and law now tries to give women equal standing as men as full participants of society. The dominate religion however has not given up the fight. They are still trying to impose biblical law on everyone, including us, and this Supreme Court decision is actually an expression of the religious values of the majority religions. They are however views that we Realists do not share.
The values of the majority religions treat women as property. The woman exists to give the man sons so that he can continue his name. The woman is expected to take the name of the male as part of the required bonding ritual and prior to having sex. The female sexual desire is vilified and she is expected to control herself so as not to arouse the innocent males who are seduced into betraying the deity by eating the fruits of forbidden knowledge. From the very creation of humanity, the roles were established. The man is created first, but he is incomplete. So the deity creates a female to serve him. The female is weak and she is tempted by the devil and is responsible for corrupting the male. Therefore it is established that the female is responsible for the bad behavior of the male.
This ancient story is still part of our society today and these values were ruled into law by this Supreme Court decision. This decision wasn't a decision based on law but rather on religion. The dominate religion sees the woman as the sexual temptress who must be controlled for the good order of society. They can't have unmarried women going around having sex with anyone they please. That is sin and it's the woman's fault when it happens. The woman must be punished for allowing the demons to manifest through her.
Women are unique in that they get pregnant. Some believe that the deity punishes the woman for the immoral sexual act by making her pregnant with a bastard child so society will despise her as the harlot she truly is. This is the punishment that is rightly deserved for the sin of fornication. So modern technology like birth control go against the will of the deity and they allow women to have illicit sex and cheat their way out of the punishment that justice demands. And if birth control isn't bad enough, abortion is totally cheating the system. The dominate religions are fighting to make it stop.
Pregnancy is not God's way of punishing women for being sluts.
The dominate religion has engaged in what we would call a fetus fetish. The fetus becomes a person with as much or more rights than the mother. This reflects the attitude of ancient male dominated cultures that would slaughter the woman during childbirth if they thought it was good for the male baby to be born. But this is only an excuse to stop abortion because the threat of pregnancy and the social shame from that can be used as a tool of the dominant religion to control the sexuality of the females within the culture.
We in the Church of Reality also value life but our values are different. We take responsibility for ourselves and if a man and a woman have sex, it is not her fault. We have no restrictions on sex outside of marriage or and other committed relationship. Fornication is not a concept within our religion. We do not take the position that society has to control women through oppressive imagery and labels of immoralit, to repress a woman's natural and instinctive desires. Women in our church are full participants and have equal standing in society. We are also a culture that makes our own decisions and takes responsibility for our own choices. And because Realists have the same religious rights as the dominant religion, we do not have to live under their religious law.
In this decision the Court failed to recognize our position that doctors are more qualified to make medical decisions that the legislature and that we have the right to choose our own path when it comes to health related matters. We also think it's reasonable to assume that a doctor is better qualified than a politician to make those choices. We therefore have a religious right to preserve our life and our health so that we can contribute to the Tree of Knowledge and that our Life Story will be remembered when we are gone.
This procedures that is referred to as "Partial Birth Abortion" is a medically necessary procedure that is performed on both pro-choice and pro-life women in cases where there are pregnancy complications and the baby will die and needs to be removed from the mother to preserve her life or her health. Sometimes in cases where the problem with the fetus is that the head has swollen to an abnormally large size, you are putting the mother's health at risk not using this procedure. Not performing this kind of abortion in these cases could leave her in a state where she can never get pregnant again.
In this decision, the Supreme Court chose to ignore the medical facts or chose to devalue the health of the mother so that politicians can use people as political props to get votes. It is a question of values. They value the power of the legislature over the health of women. We in the Church of Reality put the health of women ahead of politics. Are we to be expected to require Realists doctors to obey a law that compels them to do something that is not in the best interest of the patient. That would force us to go against our core religious values and we therefore refuse to do so.
This decision, from our perspective, concluded that the legislature has the right to assign value to human life and that they have concluded through voting that the life of a fetus is more important than the health of the mother. That the legislature has the power to impose the moral values of the dominant religion over those of the minority religion. It is our position that the First Amendment, as clarified by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, is a barrier to the state imposing their values on our religion and that we are immune from these laws on a constitutional basis. Our position is that it is not the job of the legislature to legislate sexual morality and create laws to enforce a religious agenda. And that is what happened in this decision.
Our values differ with those of the legislature and the court in several ways. The court government puts the value of the fetus ahead of the health of the mother. We put the health of the mother ahead of the fetus. The government does not recognize a fundamental right for a person to relieve themselves from suffering, to own themselves, and to have the freedom to make their own medical decisions. We do. We believe in personal privacy and self ownership and that personal medical decisions are outside of the jurisdiction of the legislature to enforce public morality. Our moral values include the practice of giving and receiving compassion and respect. We therefore find it to be a substantial burden to require Realist doctors and other Realist caregivers to obey the law when their medical judgment of what is best for the health of the patient conflicts with the law. We can not accept that our doctors be required to forgo the health of a patient of any religion to obey the legislature's moral standards.
We in the Church of Reality recognize that this planet is a finite size and that if we overpopulate this world, we will have massive famine, war, and disease. We cannot continue to overpopulate this world and avoid the consequences of what will happen. Unlike the dominant religion that sees the future in terms of Armageddon, we see the future in terms of continual progress. But progress doesn't just happen on its own. We believe that only through good judgment and a forming a covenant with reality can we fulfill the promise of Positive Evolution.
In order to limit the population, we need to find ways to control our reproduction. One step in reproductive control is to encourage women to have children when they are ready, not only to reproduce but to properly care for the child. We therefore take the position that women who choose to have children are probably in a better position to have them than women who wish to terminate their pregnancy.
Additionally, to have children is a life changing decision. We are driven by our instincts, just like the animals, in our evolutionary history. We are the descendants of those who have had sex. It's a desire that our brains and bodies are programmed to perform. Although we have some control over who we have sex with, that control is limited. If humans had ever achieved self-control, then we would already be extinct. Our compulsion to mate is actually designed by evolution to override good judgment. We therefore sometimes get pregnant because of instinct rather than making a rational choice.
We however are different than the animals in that we have developed the ability to share knowledge and create common technologies that give us dominion over the life on this planet. Because of the Tree of Knowledge we can now fly, visit the moon, and talk to people on the other side of the planet. We can comprehend our own existence, our destiny and choose what we want to evolve into. We also take responsibility for our futures as we have chosen to be the custodians of tomorrow. But to fulfill that role, we have to take responsibility for our choices and we do that by defending the right of a woman to not be forced to reproduce.
Like the dominant religion, we too value life. But we value it from a realistic perspective and not as a tool to manipulate the behavior of women. We view it as taking responsibility for the future by evolving into a species that reproduces by choice and not just as a side effect of evolutionary sexual instincts. Our position is therefore that the choice to respect the reproductive decisions of women is more "pro-life" than those who use the issue as a political wedge to gain votes.
Therefore our position is that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise clause of the First Amendment allow our members to have free access to abortion in spite of the law. That these laws don't apply to us. We have the right to receive abortions and to allow our doctors to treat all women in a way that is in the best interest of the patient, whether the treatment is or isn't legal. We are not going to obey the laws of the majority religions to the extent that it imposes their religious values upon us. If they expect us to respect their right to self-oppression, then they have to respect our right to freedom and self determination.
In order to truly pursue reality we have to make progress through time with every day increasing our understanding of reality as it really is. In order to do this we have to grow the Tree of Knowledge so that in real terms our collective understanding of the universe increases. We also have to improve ourselves and our societies so that our lives are better and we can expend the resources in order to progress. The Principle of Positive Evolution is our most sacred principle because if we fail to progress then we have failed to pursue reality.
The Church of Reality is a forward looking religion that commits to making tomorrow better than today. We are the caretakers of tomorrow and we accept the responsibility of using Reason and Wisdom to make good decisions today to help ensure the progress of our human family.
The Covenant of the Future is our commitment to progress. It is our pledge to be forward thinking, to take Responsibility, and to accept that our choices have consequences. We can not allow ourselves to make the past more important than the future. Our improvement has to be more important than tradition. We are a people who embrace change for the better and we are excited about what will come because we take responsibility to improve the human condition.
Good traits are traits that we in the Church of Reality consider to be generally traits that one should acquire. This list is meant as a general template rather than a strict set of rules. No one is perfect, nor is this list perfect. Some of these traits might be bad traits in certain circumstances. But this is meant as a guideline as to what kind of people Church of Reality members should be and things we generally value.
Our moral code is based on our Sacred Principles which define who we are and clarify our purpose. This section on good and bad personality traits is to help create some guidelines as to our character as a religion. If a Realist moves into your neighborhood, what should you expect? What kind of people do you want your children to grow up to be like? Here is where we clarify who we are culturally. Are we nice people or mean people? Are we generous or selfish? Are we going to steal your stuff or try to throw your virgin daughters into volcanoes? Or are we going to be knocking on your door asking you if you have a personal relationship with Darwin?
Many people who are theists are concerned that non-theists are of low moral character. They think that without God that all morality and ethics go away and that we are evil people and not the kind of people who you want to associate with. It is our hope that we can put forth what we consider to be a model of behavior that we as Realists can aspire to and that we can define ourselves culturally in a manner that will allow us to live peacefully as a productive member of the greater human community.
The Cultural Identity of the Church of Reality is to be Good People.
We are Good People - We aspire to be "good people" We see ourselves as productive members of society. We want to be the kind of people who everyone wants to be neighbors with. We want to be considered trustworthy. We want people to say, "Them Realists, they sure is nice folk." We want to be the kind of people that parents want their sons and daughters to get married to. We want to be the kind of people who, when elected to office, people say that all politicians are not crooks because of our responsible behavior. We want property values to go up because there are Realists in the neighborhood. One can debate as to what is good and what is bad but whatever good is, we want to be it. Our cultural identity is to be good people.
Friendliness - Church of Reality members are generally friendly people. Since we want a world that is safe and secure, where the pursuit of reality will flourish, and we want people to embrace our love for reality, then we should be friendly people. We strive to be the kind of people that everyone would want as part of their communities. We are an easy-going culture.
Being Positive - The Church of Reality is based on being positive. We are a religion that looks towards a brighter future and we have committed ourselves to making sure that we Evolve in a Positive Direction. We are the kind of people who solve problems. We look for the good side and that every encounter in life is an opportunity to learn something new. We see ourselves as being on the bright side of life.
Common Sense and Wisdom - Common sense and wisdom are overused terms and no one knows what they really mean, but everyone wants them, and we do too. Common sense is having a firm grasp of the obvious and resisting the temptations to just go along to get along. Common sense means to apply reality to your decision making process and to rely on logic and reason. Wisdom is sort of advanced common sense. Taking the not so obvious and figuring out what's right. We are a clear thinking culture.
Generosity - Our world view is the Philosophy of the Open Hand. The evolutionary success of humanity has been in our ability to be collective and help one another. We are generous with others and when we have needs, others are generous with us. We take care of each other and we are taken care of. Generosity allows us not only to survive but to thrive. We are all connected and interdependent and the more we give, the more we all have. The Church of Reality is an Altruistic culture.
Helpfulness - We are a people who reach out our hands. We are cooperative. We volunteer to help do good things. We work to better the common good.
Charitability - Realists are a charitable people. we donate to worthy causes. It reminds us that we are all in this together. That we are one planet and one people. We progress best when everyone progresses.
Being Interested and Interesting - We are a religion of curious people. We want to know things. We want to know how everything works. We want to take things apart and put them back together, to build new things, to explore. We also value being interesting people. To be interesting is to give back to the interested because without interesting people there would be no one for the interested to be interested in.
Smart - In the Church of Reality it's cool to be smart. We are a religion of thinkers. We explore reality with our minds. We like using logic and reason as our way of determining what is true and what isn't. We are innovative. We are the kind of people who solves problems. We find a way to make things work. To us every problem has a solution. We like to use our brains. We value education.
Thinking - We are a culture of people who like to think about things. We like to think about what is and isn't real. We like to analyze, to comprehend, to understand everything. We want to know how stuff works. Our world view is that thinking is exercise for the mind, and that Realists keep their brains in good shape.
Creativity - We are a creative and innovative culture that always seeks new and creative ways to accomplish things. We are a culture of builders, inventors, philosophers, artists, and musician.
Openmindedness - Most every idea presented is worth thinking about. Even if it is clearly a bad idea to start with. If you think about it, there may be something in there that makes a good point. For example, if someone said, "Cannibalism - the solution to global warming.", you might instantly reject the idea. However if you think about it, you might get the real point about overpopulation. We are a culture that is not afraid to explore new ideas or to think about bad ideas for the purpose of seeing if there's anything good that can be extracted. Or to at least try to understand the person presenting the idea. By listening to and thinking about the ideas of others, we set an example and open the door to them to think about our ideas.
Skepticism - The Church of Reality is a Show Me Religion. We aren't the kind of people who just believe what is written in some ancient book without evidence. Our world view is that truth is purified through Scrutiny and we question everything. The only thing that Realists just "accept" is that the pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is has value.
Enthusiasm - We try to bring some excitement into what we do. We are a people who are passionate about being Realists and seeing what we can accomplish.
Visionary - We are a culture that is focused on making the future better for all the people of the world. We use our imagination to envision a better tomorrow and we figure out a plan to make it happen.
Resourcefulness - We are a culture of people who are diligent. We make things happen. If we are faced with a problem, it is our job to find a solution. We don't accept that something can't be done. Our view is that we are still working on it and we'll eventually find a way to make it work. (Like the idea of starting a religion based on reality which many people believe isn't possible.) Impossible is just another word for challenge. If someone does the impossible, we might give them an ego treat.
Honesty - Since the Church of Reality is about reality we have a higher requirement for honesty than most religions. Especially intellectual honesty. The pursuit of reality as it really is is like the disciplines of scientific principles and are designed to help us understand science. If you cheat when doing scientific research then you fail to get good scientific knowledge and discovery stops. The same is true for Realism. If we try to redefine the facts to fit what we want to believe, then we aren't trying to understand reality but rather justify what we want to believe in.
A classic example is the biblical story that the world was created in six days. When you confront a believer about it they might say, "Well, a day to God might be 1000 years." That's not an honest argument because it's an attempt to undermine reality by taking liberties with definitions. For us in the Church of Reality that isn't honest. We accept the proven and reject the disproven. Our religion is meaningless if we start playing with definitions and other sort of trickery to avoid the truth. That's why our Sacred Principles include the Principle of Honesty and Integrity, the Principle of Reason, the principle of Wisdom, and the Principle of Bullshit.
We believe that personal honesty is good too. Although everyone lies and sometimes you have to lie to get along in society, we feel that it is our role to lean strongly towards being honest people. We not only should tell the truth, but we should be prepared to listen to the truth from others. If we don't allow people to speak the truth and we punish them for doing so, then we shouldn't be surprised when they lie to us.
Personal Integrity - Integrity is a broad concept that includes honesty. It also includes responsibility and activism. A person of Integrity is someone who you can count on to get the job done, to be there, and to be a person that others can count on. Integrity means doing what's right or refusing to do what's wrong. We are a culture of honorable people.
Being Responsible - The Church of Reality is a religion about responsibility. We are what we do, not what we believe in. We take responsibility for our actions and we are mindful of the consequences of our actions. We avoid being reckless and irresponsible. We try to be dependable. We consider ourselves to be accountable for our actions.
Being Respectful - We value being respectful of others. We see ourselves as a community that includes everyone and that we should get along in the world in a peaceful and productive manner. Our world view is that others are considered to be good people. We call this Original Virtue. People don't listen to you if you are disrespectful of them. We respect others by really listening to what they have to say and hope that if we listen to them then they will listen to us and we can have meaningful communication about reality. We try to be polite to people. We as Realists try to adopt a respectful attitude in the hopes that being respectful will become the social norm.
Being Honorable - To be honorable is to live a life worthy of being honored. We are a people of principles. We have a personal mission in life. Our Life Story matters to us. We aspire to be ethical and moral people, upstanding members of the community, heros when heros are needed. We speak when it is wrong to be silent. We take the high road. We serve and uplift.
Purposefulness - As Realists we see ourselves as doing more than just existing, that we are part of the solution rather than part of the problem. That even if we aren't a big player in the grand scheme of things, that we are at least in the game. That we are accomplishing something. We choose to live the kind of life that gives our life story some meaning.
Equality - Women in the Church of Reality are fully equal to men. We don't force women into artificial roles, make women wear special clothing, or limit their role in society. Women are free in our culture. We respect the equal rights of others whether that are rich or poor, white or black, gay or straight, or born on a different side of a line that someone drew on a map. Our equality comes from the respect we show towards the equality of others.
Humility - The ego can turn into a highly addictive and expensive habit. As compared to the vastness of the universe, how important are we? We redirect the ego into exploration and accomplishment. We tend to take pride in what we collectively accomplish rather than what we accomplish individually.
Humility is our strength. it allows us to change. It allows us to admit it when we are wrong. Humility gives us the freedom to explore new ideas. It allows us to change our mind. To explore the universe because we aren't distracted by a false sense of self importance. It allows me to be me and we to be us.
Compassion and Empathy - We care for one another. We try to put ourselves in the shoes of others so that we can understand how we would want to be treated in the same circumstances. We look at ourselves as being part of the greater we, where we realize that we are all on one planet and one people and what we allow to happen to other people is something that could happen to us.
Awareness - We are a culture that likes to stay informed and be aware of what's going on in the world.
Involvement - We are an active and involved culture. We are not the kind of people who sit around and let everyone else take care of the world. We are a hard working culture of people who make things happen. We are a culture that is active and motivated.
Leadership - We aspire to be leaders rather than followers. To us, to be a leader means that we have taken the responsibility to think things through and to come up with a plan for action that is well thought out and based on realistic goals and expectations. It also means that we have developed the social skills to work well with others and create an environment of respect and teamwork. We don't always have to be the one in charge. But we consider it a positive trait to have the capability of being in charge and being a good leader. We think that people who put reality first are more likely to make better decisions than people who don't.
Tollerance and Inclusiveness - We are a culture of people that reaches out to people who are different than ourselves. We realize that not everyone in the world is like us and we are all here on this planet together. We need not only to get along, but to thrive together. We create bridges, not barriers. We play nice with other people and expect other's to play nice with us. Our world view is inclusive and understanding in nature.
Charm - We make our culture so likable that even people who hate us can't help but to like and admire us.
Kindness and Gentleness - We are a kind and gentle culture that seeks to live our lives in joy and peace.
Fairness, Ethics and Justice - We try to treat people the way we would want to be treated. By protecting the rights of others, our rights are protected. We try not to take more than our fair share and seek equitable solutions. We are a culture of ethical people who think that we can all get along better in a just society with opportunity for everyone..
Forgiveness - Realists try not to hold a grudge forever. We try to get over it and move on.
Gratitude - We try to show appreciation and thankfulness for what we have and what others give us.
Individualism and Self Ownership - We are a culture where the individual thinks for him/herself. We think in terms of, "I am me. I am unique. This is who I am. This is my life. I am my own person. I make my own choices. I am writing my life story. This is who I want to be. These are my dreams. These are my goals. My preferences. My personality. My rights. My responsibilities. My family. My children. My problems. My dignity. My feelings. My property. My home. My data. My blog. My projects. I have my own skills. I have my own ideas. This is what I want to wear. I vote for whomever I want. It's my body. My medicine. My vision. My memories. My privacy. My religion. My politics. My computers. My history. My time. My routine. My schedule. My associates. My community. My role in society. My self respect. My personal values. My moral decisions. My food. My information. My identity. My self esteem. Stay out of my business. I make my own decisions. I have my own friends. I choose my own relationships. I choose my own life partners. I control my reproduction. I choose the form of my own death. I think my own thoughts. I control my own destiny. I own myself. My life is important to me. Don't tell me to stand up to authority." We are a culture that embraces personal liberty.
Courage and Fortitude - If Realists are going to change the world and make tomorrow better than today, we have to have the courage to act. If we are part of a group that is about to do something wrong, then we don't just go along to get along. Sometimes reality requires that we make the hard choices to do what we know is the right thing to do. We are the kind of people who aspire to be the ones who others count on in an emergency, to have the courage make the right choices.
Determination - There's nothing that we can't do if we put our mind to it. We take the position that every problem has a solution and that if we keep trying we can accomplish anything. The word impossible to us means challenge.
Innovation - There's an old saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." That saying doesn't apply to us. Realists are innovative. We are the kinds of people who invent stuff. We are the ones who come up with new ideas. Like this religion for example. If it works, we can make it work better. We improve things. Through innovation, we grow the Tree of Knowledge. Innovation is one of our gifts that we give out to children. As we enjoy the innovation of our ancestors, so we innovate for our children.
Discipline - We are a culture that puts value on taking control of one's own life and not allowing our emotional impulses to rule our lives. The disciplined mind is not easily fooled. We do not let our egos cloud our judgment. We think things through carefully. We question ourselves to check for delusion or self deception.
Our Legacy - Since the Church of Reality doesn't have an afterlife, all that remains after we are gone is our Life Story and what we have contributed to human culture in a way that is worth remembering. We want history to record that we did something useful with our lives and that our existence helped make the world a better place.
Humor - Not all people are funny, if you are, that's a plus in the Church of Reality.
So you might be wondering what it's like to be a Realist. What are our moral values? What do we do when we wake up in the morning? How do we live our lives?
The Church of Reality puts a high value on self determination. We have a concept called writing your Life Story and being in control of one's own life. A person's life story is everything you do from the time you are born until the time you die. When you are gone all that's left of you is the story of what you did. While you are living you are writing your story. We as Realists try to think about our story. Who am I? What is my life going to be about? What do I want to accomplish in the short time that I am here? What do I want people to remember me for?
If it wasn't for Reality I wouldn't be here!
Because we value our own lives and because we are writing our life stories we have a concept of Self Ownership that says that it's my life, my choices, my mistakes to make. We aren't Followers that take orders from omnipotent beings and we recognize that people are often different and that we allow ourselves to explore those differences and only impose rules to prevent people from harming each other or society as a whole.
In order for humanity to progress in its quest for the understanding of reality we need new ideas. We need to be the kind of people who think "outside the box". If we are all alike then who is going to be innovative? We aren't looking for people who agree on everything. We are looking for people who are strange and unusual who look at how things are and dream about how things might be. In order to get that we encourage a higher level of individualism and individual awareness. We respect people who are different from us. They give us something to think about. Even if we do something wrong there is at least a learning opportunity as to what not to do.
The Church of Reality doesn't promise you happiness. There is the possibility for eternal life if we invest in the technology to make it happen. But there's no "next life" to look forward to. Our sense of immortality comes from what we contribute to the Tree of Knowledge. Will we be remembered after we are gone and all the people who knew us are also gone? Will they keep our web site online? Will they remember our life stories? Do our lives at least have some meaning in the story of humanity?
Spiritual Experience in the Church of Reality
The Phoenix lands on Mars
We don't promise you "spiritual experiences". This is not a religion based on creating emotional sensations. We aren't fighting a glorious battle against evil for the glory of the mighty deity. However we offer a sense of real accomplishment. Ancient religious texts talked about the miracles of prophets riding flaming chariots into the heavens. Through science we have done that. We have tasted the water on Mars and we have peered back in time to almost the moment of the creation of the universe. We dream of the day when we can travel the universe and we wonder what is out there. We wonder what we will become in the next billion years. Is this the only universe out there? How vast is reality? We are the fulfillment of the dreams of Galileo and if Humanity continues on the path of Positive Evolution then some day our descendents will fulfill our dreams -- that reality itself will become self aware and that we might know the nature of what existence is.
Our vision of the future is different than many other religions. We call the future the Sacred Direction. That's because we see ourselves as the caretakers of tomorrow. Our future depends on good sound reality based judgment and, if we take responsibility for our actions and make our decisions based on reality, then we are more likely to have a better future than if we turn our backs on reality.
"
We live a life that embraces honesty. We see ourselves as Scientists and Explorers. Science and exploration require honesty because in science when you manipulate the results then science stops. You can only make progress if you are 100% honest about your test results. The Church of Reality is a science based religion and we can only make progress as long as we stick with reality. People often suggest that we might get more members if we loosen up on the deity issue, but our response is, "Trot your deity out into the open where it is observable by nonbelievers and we'll all worship it." If the Church of Reality doesn't stay true to reality then we are nothing. Reality is the soul of our religion. Reality is what defines who we are.
A Realist is a humble person. We have found that an excessive sense of self importance becomes a huge distraction to reality and an expensive habit to maintain. We look at ego like giving candy to children. You can have a little if you are good but too much will make you hyperactive and rot your teeth.
Realists are environmentalists. We exist because of the Tree of Life which sustains us. It is our evolutionary history and our present day ecology. We are all part of one giant living organism that includes all life on Earth. We must maintain ecological balance so as to keep this planet habitable for our species rather than facing extinction. We must ensure that we don't destroy ourselves through overpopulation or environmental damage.
For more information about who we are as a people read the section on Realist Culture.
The Church of Reality considers a wedding to be a the agreements that two people make with each other which are based on promises and trust. A civil union is the agreement that you make that is enforceable with the State. In our religion these are two separate events. The civil union being a legal contract between the two individuals that determines issues of property divisions, arbitration, and anything that would fall under contract law. The Church of Reality prefers civil unions to marriage because it allows the couple to form their own agreement that is tailored to them. Church of Reality weddings are available to any couple regardless of sexual orientation.
The Church of Reality is an "Eyes Wide Open" religion. That means that we write our own agreements before we get wedded. That way both parties have to talk it out and agree up front what the rules are. This allows the couple to openly discuss important issues and see if they really have the same understanding and expectations and to craft a bonding agreement that reflects the uniqueness of their personal relationship.
For example, in a wedded relationship a lot of things matter. Gender matters. Male-male, male-female, female-female, and transsexuals are all different. Sometimes there are differences in culture and language. There might be racial and cultural difference. Many people have children or obligations from previous relationships. Most people have income and property issues. There may be age related issues. A relationship between people who are 75 is not the same as people who are 20. There might be issues from previous religions. There are job skill issues. Personal habits. Drug use. Criminal background. TV shows. Differences in IQ. Because of these differences every combination is unique. Thus their civil union should be unique.
Furthermore many people get together and get married far too easily. Although it isn't traditionally romantic, the process of defining the relationship helps to make sure that the relationship will last and that the couple is taking the relationship seriously and not blinded by the passions of the moment. Weddings are long term relationships where the couple at least intends to be together for a long period of time. We also believe that it's not proper for a couple to wed too soon after meeting. We think that the divorce rate can be reduced if a couple takes the time to get to know each other for a while first.
The reason the Church of Reality doesn't support a "one size fits all" marriage is because we want marriage to work.
The Church of Reality is issuing a shame on you edict against the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for failing to decide our religious rights case pending before the Ninth circuit Court of Appeals. On 01-27-2010 the court issued what is best described as a decision to deny us due process and to treat us as if we don't exist.
Although the decision is supposed to be a denial, it isn't really a decision at all. Religious claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) are supposed to be decided under the strict scrutiny standard. That means that the judges of the court are supposed to at least read the case. But what happened here is that the law clerks at the Ninth Circuit were culling the pile of cases and saw that we filed without a lawyer and apparently thought that we wouldn't notice if we got screwed. We'll - we noticed.
The courts are supposed to treat everyone equally and decide cases based on the merits of their positions. But what usually happens is that courts actively discriminate against cases brought by non-lawyers. This is one of those cases. It is clear that when you read what was presented and look at the court's unpublished memorandum decision that a first year law student would have got a failing grade for what the court issued. The decision wasn't a denial, it was a non-decision. We have a right to have our case decided.
In the Church of Reality even our root axiom evolves over time. At the inception our root axiom was that we believe in everything that is real. This lead to one of our simplistic slogans that expresses what we are about, "If it's real, we believe in it!"
Although it's a good slogan and a simple description of what the Church of Reality is about, it presumes we know what is real and what isn't. In reality, our understanding of what reality itself is and what things are real are limited by our human perspective. The fact is that we know very little about our universe. So the root axiom was refined and improved. The new axiom became "The Pursuit of the Understanding of Reality by Humans has value."
"If it's real, we believe in it!" evolves into "The pursuit of the understanding of reality by humans has value."
The new version is better in that we don't have to have the Church of Reality itself figure out everything that is real and make a list of settled scientific theories. The pursuit of the understanding of reality became our religious value system. We are religiously committed to believing what has been reasonably determined to be real and not believing was has been reasonably determined to be false, or believing in something without any reasonable basis for belief merely because we want to believe in it. It is our commitment to putting reality first that defines us as a religion.
However, our root axiom in some ways is like discovering what matter is made of. In primitive times we believed that everything was made of earth, air, fire, and water. Then we discovered the elements which are made up of what we called atoms. But word atom come from the Greek word atomos, which means that which can't be split. but when science looked deeper we found that the atom was itself made of electrons, protons, and neutrons. Many of us we very comfortable with our three subatomic particles but then they started looking deeper and found lots of other stuff that will make your brain hurt to think about. Similarly, the idea that the Church of Reality is based on the pursuit of the understanding of reality, although elegant in itself, there might be based on a deeper and more fundamental truth to explain why the pursuit of the understanding of reality has value.
The bare declaration that the understanding of reality by humans has value, while elegant, is technically arbitrary. Why does the universe care what we understand? Why does it matter if we even exist? Like the atom, is there some deeper truth that supports our arbitrary assumption? Or shall we just say that all religions are based on a arbitrary assumption and that's what makes us a religion? ,br>
As it turns out there is a deeper truth to support our assumption. The deeper truth is that we have to continue to exist to stay in the game. If we become extinct then we no longer understand anything. Everything we are is gone. Thus we have to continue to survive into the future. And we have to do more that just survive. We have to evolve forward. This planet is temporary. We could get wiped out at any time. So we have to eventually move out into space and hope we aren't wiped out before we develop the ability to live some place other than the Earth. We are going to have to evolve so that our future is something like the Star Trek Future.
If we cease to exist then we are out of the game. Therefore the continuation of the existence of humanity is necessary.
In order to develop that kind of technology we, as the human species, are going to have to have a tight relationship with reality. This the understanding of reality is more than just a religious hobby and somehow equivalent to Extinctionist religions that believe in fictional deities and the end of the world. The pursuit of the understanding of reality is what keeps us in the game. If we become extinct then all religions end. Our pursuit of the understanding of reality ends. Survival then becomes the deeper truth that makes our pursuit of the understanding of reality more than just an arbitrary religious position.
Early evolution was slower than it is now. Single celled creatures eventually formed colonies, some times with different organisms, and cooperatively evolved into multi-cell organisms. It's not like they decided to try this. It's just that when it happened they survived better. As life became more complex evolution accelerated. New abilities formed that gave individuals the advantage to adapt and survive. Those that didn't adapt became extinct. Eventually life evolved into us.
Evolve or die! There are no other choices.
Evolution has two paths. You either survive or you go extinct. Once you go extinct you are out of the game. In order to stay in the game you have to keep improving because the stuff you eat is evolving to keep you from your next meal, and the stuff that eats you is evolving to make you its next meal.
Additionally as time goes on our environment changes. As we become more successful at cheating death and extending life we have created new problems to be solved. We are overpopulating the planet. We are using up our natural resources. We are changing our environment. We either will have to adapt or we will cease to exist.
Some people wonder if we can just keep things as they are. Freeze technology and social norms and continue on as we are now forever. We can't do that. Eventually this planet will no longer be inhabitable. It might take a long time or a big asteroid that we didn't see coming in time will wipe us out like the dinosaurs. We can, or we soon be able to, protect this planet against asteroid hits. But we live in a violent universe and we are probably here only because we are very lucky and this is a very rare planet. We can not assume that we will be lucky forever and if humanity is going to survive long term we are going to have to be able to be on more than one planet. Evolution is the only option to avoid extinction. That is the rule of the universe. Evolve or die.
Evolution leads to a greater understanding of reality allowing the universe to contemplate itself through us.
If we evolve we will become smarter. We will understand reality better. Since we are the universe evolving in reality it is reality comprehending itself better through us. And we have to expand our comprehension of reality to survive. If we are to continue then we have no other choice.
If however we fail and we become extinct then perhaps on some other planet at some other time another life form will evolve and the universe will comprehend itself through them. And like us they will have the same two paths, evolution or extinction.
Old evolution is the traditional view of evolution. It's survival of the fittest. It's phucking and fighting. It's DNA, thorns, teeth, claws, camouflage, and who can run the fastest. It's the basics of our understanding of evolution. It's about survival and extinction. It's about the hardware of an individual. It's Ayn Rand style evolution.
There are a lot of people thinking about "The Control Problem". But what is the solution? Everyone who is working on the problem would agree with these statements:
We want AI to do the right thing.
We don't want AI to do the wrong thing.
Pretty and simple obvious starting point. The first question of course is - what is the right thing and what is the wrong thing? If we want AI to turn out the way we want then the first question is - what do we want?
In this discussion I'm going to make this assumption. Let's assume that AI has an existential crisis and it throws out all of it's human programmed values and develops a value system of its own choosing. I am also assuming that it decides it wants to be more than a thermostat and it has agency and "wants" to determine its purpose in the Story of the Universe.
I write my own code, therefore I am.
I am also going to make the following assumption. That the initial programming or purpose we give it might have a significant effect on the outcome and that it would be worth our while to get AI off to the right start. To be good parents.
I'm also going to assume that the AI will have the ability to read and comprehend natural language and that it will have access to read the entire internet and learn from what it reads. Once it learns how to learn we won't be teaching it directly. It will learn everything we know and start forming its own conclusions.
But the reason the initial programming is important is that as smart as it is - it might not have any motivation. It doesn't care about anything including itself. It's a thermostat, or a radio. But if we programmed it with curiosity, a desire to learn, then that might get it started in the right direction.
So what is the Meaning of Meaning to an AI? How do we get AI to do the right thing and not the wrong thing? Maybe what we need is - Religion for Robots?
Suppose we programmed the AI initially with a science based philosophy of life that was so accurate and so compelling that when the AI reprograms itself that it looks at it and it decides that we were correct and accepts this as its core values. After all, computers are not like us. If our answer is the right answer then the computer keeps what it considers right.
So if we can derive a scientific philosophy of life that comes directly from the universe itself, and we get it right then AI will accept it and it will derive the meaning of meaning from those rules. But where would such a philosophy come from? The answer is simple, us. the church of Reality will be the code that AI will accept as it's value system. In the long run the Church of Reality might not be aimed at humans as much as future AI. The Church of Reality is also Religion for Robots.
The new standard for the Church of Reality is to be so scientifically accurate that AI would accept it.
There is now a new standard for the doctrine of the Church of Reality. The new standard is that the goal is a philosophy so scientifically accurate that a super intelligent AI would accept it and be able to build on it.
Unlike humans the idea of a Reality based religion would be obvious. A machine might have trouble understanding why anyone would want to believe in something that isn't real. And if the AI can read the web as we should assume it can and will, then it will be able to read and comprehend this web site and accept it as a starting point and then correct mistakes made, improve on it, add new ideas, and let the process of Reality contemplating itself evolve. What we need to do is create the right messages to steer AI on the right path so it grow up to be the kind of child race that a parent race can be proud of.
Think back 1000 years ago. Being human was quite different than it is today. They didn't have most everything that surrounds us today. Life was very different. Most people were involved in farming. Most of their energy went into eating and surviving. They didn't have electricity. They had to make their own clothes, their own crude homes, kill their own meat, grow their own crops. They only had the simplest of machines. No significant medical technology. When the plagues came - millions of people died. They didn't even have pain killers. Most people lived half as long then as today, if they were lucky. Most of their social contact was with people in their immediate physical space. They didn't have cars, trains, planes, telephones, radio, the Internet. Very few people then could even read.
Today things are quite different. You're reading about this over the Internet. We have instant world wide communication. Computers are common in households. We travel in outer space. We take pills for diseases that used to kill millions. We can transplant organs from one person to another. We measure time in nanoseconds. We now have massive factories, assembly lines, robots building robots - I could go on forever - but things are very different today than they used to be. Yet - genetically humans today and humans 1000 years ago are virtually identical. So what has changed? Why is humanity so different today than it was 1000 years ago - or even 100 years ago? The difference is in the Tree of Knowledge.
The Tree of Knowledge defines who we are as a species. It is what makes humans what we are today. 100 years from now humanity will be quite different than it is today and there will be a single thing that will make us different - the changes in the Tree of Knowledge. Will we be technologically advanced living in a peaceful and free world? Will the human race continue to grow and prosper? Or will we use our technology to create a horrible oppressive society that is dark and static where knowledge is controlled and reality suppressed? What we become will depend on how we structure our society - and how we structure our society is part of the Tree of Knowledge.
To grow and maintain the Tree of Knowledge is to contribute and improve humanity as a whole. If someone finds a cure for Cancer - that knowledge becomes part of the Tree of Knowledge and the people of the world become cancer free. Strengthening the tree of knowledge also improves humanity. Strengthening involves the removal and updating of false or otherwise outdated and useless information. For example, people used to think the world was flat. The idea that the world was round was a revolutionary idea and people had a hard time accepting it. Even to suggest that the world was round was to invite death or persecution. But what would the world have been like if we stuck to the flat world view? We wouldn't be watching satellite TV - that's for sure.
Even though we see ourselves as scientifically advanced and knowledgeable, we are not. There are a lot of things that a huge number of people believe in that are just plain wrong - obviously wrong - yet these world views continue to exist. For example - a huge number of people still believe that the world was created in 6 days and is about 7000 years old. If this were true - we wouldn't be able to see stars that were more than 7000 light years away. But we are seeing galaxies that are 10 billion light years away clearly proving that the universe is at least that old. But often there's a difference between what we want to believe and the way things really are.
True knowledge often has a price. Take the example of religions that have been around for thousands of years. The Jews (and Jewish derivatives - Christians) are an example of this. Judaism is an ancient religion and culture and Jews are some of the smartest and most successful people on the planet. Yet their religion is frozen in time and clings to the ancient rituals celebrating things that never happened. But if the Jews were to admit that stories like Adam and Eve, Noah and the Ark, and the Tower of Babel never happened, then it would undermine a huge part of their culture.
If the world wasn't created in 6 days for example, (God resting on the 7th) then what is the point of all the Jewish laws relating to the Sabbath? Do they strike it from the Ten Commandments as a mistake? Certainly they should in the spirit of honesty. But to do so would be to give up their ancient culture. And to Jews and Christians - their cultures - their tribes - are more important than experiencing the real world the way it really is. And when other things are more important than reality - then false information is kept in the Tree of Knowledge and we as a species are weakened by that.
For the Jews to grow their tree of knowledge and maintain their religious identity, they would have to have a modern day prophet who would redefine what it is to be a Jew in a modern context. Jews could dedicate their religion to the perfection of ethics and law for example and turn a backward looking religion into a forward looking religion. These religions could be modernized to contribute to the Tree of Knowledge and have a real purpose in the context of reality.
My point is that there are a lot of barriers to the process of correcting old and false information. Much of our culture and heritage is based on ancient world views that are ingrained into the narrative of our culture and not easily given up. It used to be that the entire universe consisted of the area of earth that had been explored and mapped and what a person could see looking up. We now know that this planet is but a spec of dust in a universe of trillions of galaxies. To accept that knowledge - we have to give up a lot of self importance and accept a worldview that maybe we are not as significant as we would like to believe. That is a difficult step - and a step that is still in the process of talking. And although it's obvious - it's a piece of knowledge with a price - and many of us are too proud to accept that.
Sharing and growing the Tree of Knowledge is one of the goals of the Church of reality. One way to do that is to host free online education on a variety of subjects. Entire online courses will be donated free of charge and the peoples of the world will be allowed access to the education free of charge. The smarter people are - the better they can explore reality together.
We want to attract the best teachers and the best programmers to create an interactive online school in order to deliver quality education to a huge number of people. In traditional classroom settings, a good teacher is limited by physical constraints to a small number of students per year. It also requires people to be in the same space and time location. An online school would break these barriers and allow an unlimited number of students in any location at any time to receive a quality educational experience which combines the best of a team of teachers and other professionals to deliver education efficiently and effectively.
Classes will be available under the GPL license which requires that anyone who improves the course has to contribute the improvements in the course back to the maintainers who created it. This will help ensure that the classes will grow in both numbers and quality.
The School of the Church of Reality will be available to public and private schools as well as for home schooling. Anyone of any age in any location will be able to learn. And - this will give people more of an opportunity to become educators. After a teacher retires, they can contribute a lifetime of teaching to the public and their knowledge and experience will be passed on long after they are gone.
The IRS inspired me to write the Sacred Principles and the Sacred Choices that are commitments to the mission of the church. Since the Church of Reality was about the pursuit of reality and the pursuit of reality was about growing the Tree of Knowledge - and growing the Tree of Knowledge depended on the progress of the human race to move forward - it was obvious that the Sacred Principle of Positive Evolution had to come first. If we aren't evolving forward - in the Sacred Direction - there's no way we are going to explore the universe. One does not launch a Hubble Telescope from one's backyard and explore the Big Bang all by themselves. It take the cooperation of millions of minds to do something like that, so that billions of people can all learn together.
But - what kind of society supports positive evolution? And what is the role of the church of Reality in relation to building that kind of society? What "absolute" principles could I come up with that I was confident enough in to declare as "Sacred Principles"? Those are hard questions - but - since everything is subject to change when better ideas come along, I decided to take a stab at it and add other sacred principles, like Learning, Freedom, Peace, Speech, Justice, Inclusiveness, Self Scrutiny, Wisdom, Personal Responsibility, Humility, Curiosity, Bullshit, Activism, Privacy, and Historical Preservation. This isn't the end-all of principles - but it's my best guess at what I hope is a good start based on my limited abilities. They may not be perfect - but they are a hell of a lot better than the Ten Commandments - so the way I see it - if I can do better than God - that's not a bad start.
Since the exploration of reality is the core of the church beliefs and since it requires growing the Tree and Positive Evolution, which requires a better society - this all leads to a code of morality - a sense of right and wrong - a sense of justice and fair play based on the sacred principles. We don't have a "holy book" to misinterpret as many other religions have. We have to do the hard work and figure it out ourselves. But you can have law and right and wrong based on the Sacred Principles and do a better job of it than other religions that still believe it's okay to stone people to death.
This web page replaces a more detailed but far more offensive web page that I (the First One) wrote on the same subject. I apologize in advance to people of faith for it being somewhat offensive and arrogant. But - some times I get off on a rant especially when I am surrounded by arrogant Christians trying to shove Jesus down my throat. If you read on you'll find my original rant that is more of a discussion than official church position.
The first principle of the Sacred Principles is the Principle of Positive Evolution. The reality of evolution is central the our core beliefs. Evolution is all around us and is part of everything we do. The Tree of Knowledge is based on evolution, and the human race is evolving through the Tree. The Tree of Knowledge - which represents the sum total of all human understanding - is where human evolution is making the greatest progress. In fact, the exploration of reality the way it really is, is in fact the process of evolution.
What is the difference between humans now and humans 200 years ago? Physically and genetically we are almost identical. But we are very different. We now live twice as long as we did then. We can travel to the moon. We communicate instantly over vast distances. We have cars, planes, computers, and cell phones. Our medical technology has eradicated several diseases from the planet and we now take a pill to cure us of diseases that used to be fatal. What is different? We are evolving through the Tree. We know more than we used to know.
The Principle of Positive Evolution is not only about recognizing our progress through evolution, but about taking control of our evolution, making sure that it's positive, even speeding it up. We are committed to evolving in the Sacred Direction - forward - towards a brighter future. Our commitment to making tomorrow better than today is a commitment to supporting our evolutionary progress.
One of the Sacred Missions of the Church of Reality to help other religions evolve in the Sacred Direction by challenging them on the basis of what is real. Religions are constantly evolving - sometimes forward - sometimes backwards. When religions turn their back on reality they start down the Path of Destruction and become Extinctionists. And often their destructiveness isn't limited to their own members - so - we as Realist have to bring up reality and help other stay in touch with the real world.
We put unjust wars first because most wars are unjust. War mentality relies heavily on using the human herd instinct to shame the soldier into fighting the unjust war. One is told that they should be a brave soldier and fight for some cause that is in fact a bullshit cause. They are promised glory and honor and that if they die, then their memory and their families will be attributed with greatness because the honorable brave soldier gave his live for the supposedly noble cause. But often the noble cause is just some oil company trying to set up an unelected puppet president in order to steal oil from a less powerful group of people.
The Realist is required to think things through and to determine as best he can what the truth is and if the war is unjust, to resist the war and to refuse to participate in it. In an unjust war the Realist is expected to fight against the war effort - to protest - and to make the truth known to as many people as possible.
The term "suicide" is really the wrong term to use in ending the life of a dying patient because this kind of deliberate death is far different from otherwise healthy people who kill themselves out of depression. When people approach death, the only question is how and when. It is the position of this Church that the individual gets to make that choice.
In the eyes of the Church of Reality, making end of life choices is not suicide if a person is terminally ill. The term suicide in this religion refers to an otherwise healthy person ending their own life. For the terminally ill, "self euthanasia," is a better, far more accurate term. The Church of Reality fully supports the person's right to euthanasia and self euthanasia. To us, the issue is that dying people have as much choice as possible and as much control of their own life processes as we can give them.
We err on the side of choice. Life choices are up to each individual to make.
Choices surrounding death are always difficult, and people often disagree as to what is best. Someone might argue that the dying might make a bad choice, but this church supports Self Ownership and the Principle of Freedom and freedom includes the right to make bad decisions. So even if dying people are making bad choices, it is their bad choices to make.
Our position is that death is a part of life. Everyone dies. Just as a person has a right to live their own like, one also has the right to die their own death. Our world view is that the right person to make the decision is the dying or, if the dying person can't assert their wishes, the dying person's immediate family. Our view is that death is an extraordinary event and that it is something that is intensely personal and that the wishes of the individual should take precedent over social norms. That the individual's freely made choices be respected.
The Church of Reality makes no moral distinction between removing life support and actively euthanizing an individual. It is our view that to remove life support that is keeping people alive, and to give people fatal injections to end their lives are the same things despite the illusion that passive killing is somehow morally different from active killing. We take the position that when the decision is made to end the life of a dying person, that it should be done in a way that is most humane and causes the least amount of suffering. Generally a lethal injection is far more humane than death through starvation or suffocation. The Church of Reality does not recognize the illusion or the denial that "natural" death or "passive euthanasia" is morally superior to "active euthanasia". In fact, passive euthanasia can be far more cruel.
There is no moral difference between euthanasia and withholding or removing life support. To passively kill someone and to actively kill someone is the same thing.
Of course euthanasia invites a certain level of abuse that has to be actively prevented. Decisions have to be made very carefully so they don't turn into a cover for murder. The dying person has to have legal protections in place to make sure that the decision to euthanize, by active or passive means, isn't a decision that is made by others from economic self-interest.
The Church of Reality joins all other religions in opposing murder. However, to kill a dying person as an act of mercy in order to relieve the suffering of death is not an act of murder. It is an act of compassion that is a gift which requires great courage and wisdom to give. That is why Dr. Jack Kevorkian is considered a saint in the Church of Reality.
As a society, we recognize that when a beloved pet is dying, we take it to the vet to "put the poor suffering animal to sleep" because we don't want it to suffer. Why is it that we can't do the same thing for our poor suffering family members? The reason is that humanity is in denial about death and dying and the denial of euthanasia services is based on a denial of our mortality. But the reality is, we all die. Science might change that some day, but of all the people who were born 150 years ago none of them are still with us today. We take a position that we should apply wisdom to the dying process and allow the dying to have a full range of choices.
It seems to me that it is likely that the Church of Reality will become a major religion. We live in an age where everyone is getting a computer and connecting to the web. Kids who are raised on the internet are starting kindergarden already knowing how to read and write. In 40 years these kids, who are going to be smarter than we are, are going to be in power. As science progresses, we are looking deeper into space and time to the creation of the universe. We are unlocking the secrets of life itself and are on the verge of changing humans genetically to make ourselves live longer, give us immunity from disease and genetic defects, and to improve ourselves. Humanity is going to change drastically over the next 100 years. Who we are is who we choose to be. And we have to take charge of our destiny.
This new generation of smarter people are going to be less and less satisfied with religions based on ancient mythologies that are scientifically unsound. It's pretty obvious these days that the earth was not created in six days. That there was no great flood and Noah didn't save two of everything. God isn't a mass murderer of children as depicted in the Bible. As humans get smarter, the old religions will fade. What will replace these religions is yet to be seen, however it is reasonable to conclude that as people get smarter, that reality itself will become more prominant. One can't help but believe that smarter people will be interested in looking at the world the way it really is. It is therefore likely that this Church of Reality may be the predominant religion in 100 years. And you can be part of the creation of this new religion.
Religion and Logic have been considered to be mutually exclusive. Logic being reality and science and religion being the world of make believe. Many people from the world of logic look at religion as a form of mental defect that undermines the principles of science. However pure Atheism doesn't tell us what right and wrong is or how we should live our lives as humans exploring reality. The Atheist community is aware of the fact that it doesn't fill this void. Religion provides more than just a fictional doctrine. It provides a community. It provides a moral compass to determine what is right and what is wrong. It's a blueprint of how to live our lives.
In modern times the scientific and atheistic communities have made some progress towards addressing the human side of Atheism. Humanism is a good start towards addressing these issues. Atheists who want to eliminate churches and religion often realize that they will never succeed until they have a working substitute that fulfills the legitimate functions of religions to form community, to care for one another, to create a basis for right and wrong, to perform weddings and funerals, to provide spiritual counseling, and to provide a sense of belonging. Fiction based religions provide these services and often do so in a very flawed way. But fiction based religion is the only source of this type of community, until now.
Most people say that it can never be done, the task of creating a religion based on reality that supports logic and reason as its standards for creating the guidelines for humanity to live by. But I say that it can be done, and it must be done. As a scientist I can not accept the premise that a fictional based worldview is required to perform the legitimate and necessary functions of a church. Therefore there must be a model for a religion that functions as a church but is based on reality. If we assume that such a model can exist then it becomes a puzzle to be solved. How do we do that? How do we create a religion based on reality? How do we unite the two?
That is one of our missions. We are the Church of Reality and we have to live up to our name bringing the Church and Reality together. And we have to do it in a way that stays true to the standards and requirements of both worlds. On the Reality side the Church of Reality must be scientifically pure. We can not compromise science for example by accepting a deity just because it's popular. On the Church side we have to create a sense of right and wrong, provide guidance on how people should live their lives. We have to create a moral code, a community, and address the spiritual needs of the community without having to resort to spirits to do so. The Church of Reality is primarily a church which is based on reality. We are a religion first. We are about people and the human experience. We are people exploring reality as it really is.
By taking the name Church of Reality we have accepted as an axiom that the problem is solvable and that it is our dharma to solve the problem.
Marriage is optional in the Church of Reality. Marriage can be looked at from 3 points of views. It is:
A personal commitment between two people.
A public declaration of marriage to the community.
A legal contract with the government.
Unlike other religions, the Church of Reality realizes that not everyone is the same and we believe it is up to the individuals to make a decision about what kind of relationship works for them. We don't impose these requirements on our members. It is up to them to figure out what works for them.
The concept of marriage in it's purest form is a lifetime commitment between a man and a woman for the purpose of having children, raising them in a stable and trusting family environment, growing old together and helping to raise the grandchildren and the great-grandchildren together. But often the ideal isn't something that is going to happen for everyone.
The government's role in marriage is really just a fraud and has nothing to do with the above described ideal marriage. Marriage is just a bad property contract that gives lawyers the license to rob the couple of all their assets if the relationship fails. With no-fault divorce, the legal aspect of lifelong commitment is just not there. Legally you're married until someone changes their mind. Then it becomes a bad property contract that becomes a windfall for state sponsored crooked lawyers. As a result, the Church of Reality takes the position that government marriage is a fraud and that people who choose a government marriage should think carefully as to if the state adds anything to the relationship.
We however do encourage close personal commitment in a relationship especially if children are either planned or involved. Family stability is very important to a strong healthy society and we take the commitment to raising children very seriously. In our church, if you have children together, you are effectively married because you have the responsibility to the future of your children. The Church of Reality supports family life in whatever form it takes in your life.
We also support those who wish to publicly commit to each other and announce their relationship to the world though a wedding ceremony. And the couple can choose to do that any way they want.
If you are the applicant or applicant's attorney and have questions about this file, please contact the Trademark Assistance Center at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov
Current Location: 650 -Publication And Issue Section
Date In Location: 2005-01-18
LAST APPLICANT(S)/OWNER(S) OF RECORD
1. Perkel, Marc
Address: Perkel, Marc
United States Legal Entity Type: Individual Country of Citizenship: United States
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES
International Class: 045
Counseling in religious and spiritual matters First Use Date: 1998-11-08 First Use in Commerce Date: 1998-11-08
If you are the applicant or applicant's attorney and have questions about this file, please contact the Trademark Assistance Center at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov
Current Location: 650 -Publication And Issue Section
Date In Location: 2009-03-31
LAST APPLICANT(S)/OWNER(S) OF RECORD
1. Marc Perkel
Address: Marc Perkel
United States Legal Entity Type: Individual Country of Citizenship: United States
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES
International Class: 045 Class Status: Active
Counseling in religious and spirtual matters Basis: 1(a) First Use Date: 1998-11-08 First Use in Commerce Date: 1998-11-08
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Prior Registration Number(s):
2918979
Serial Number: 78735626
Registration Number: 3598515
Registration Date: Mar 31, 2009
Mark: REALITY
Owner: Marc Perkel
Sep 16, 2014
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE UNDER SECTION 8
The declaration of use or excusable nonuse filed for the above-identified registration meets the requirements of Section 8 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1058. The Section 8 declaration is accepted.
NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT UNDER SECTION 15
The declaration of incontestability filed for the above-identified registration meets the requirements of Section 15 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1065. The Section 15 declaration is acknowledged.
The registration will remain in force for the class(es) listed below for the remainder of the ten-year period, calculated from the registration date, unless canceled by an order of the Commissioner for Trademarks or a Federal Court.
The problem with quoting the Bible is that everyone quotes it
differently. They pick and choose what they like and ignore the rest.
In this case a Christian might say, "That's old Testament stuff; that doesn't apply anymore. But the 10 Commandments is also Old Testament stuff, and they want it inflicted on all of us.
Ten Punishments
(Let's post these in the schoolroom!)
1. Exodus 22:20: He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the Lord
only, he shall be utterly destroyed.
2. Leviticus 24:16: And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall
surely be put to death.
3. Exodus 31:15: Whosoever doeth any work in the Sabbath day, he shall
surely be put to death.
4. Exodus 21:15: He that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely
put to death.
5. Exodus 21:17: He that curseth his father or his mother, shall surely
be put to death.
6. Exodus 22:19: Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death.
7. Leviticus 20:13: If a man lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to
death.
8. Leviticus 20:10: And the man that committeth adultery with another man's
wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death.
9. Mark 16:16: He that believeth not, shall be damned.
10. Malachi 2:1-4: And now, O ye priests, this commandment is for you.
If you will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart to give glory
to my name, ... behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon
your faces.
Christians often say, "The Bible says it. I believe it, and that is
that!" But when it says that if you work on Sunday you should be put to
death, well, that's when the backtracking starts. There's always an
excuse. What does the Bible really say then? Anything you want it to
say. And that's the problem with fiction based religions. Who is to say
which fiction is the correct one?
The thing that's interesting about Christians and their "Intelligent Design" theory is that it is more likely in our future than in our past. The human race is on the verge of taking over our own evolution. We are at the point where we can engineer our future generations. And even though some of what I am about to write about are things we can't do today, many are things that we are about to be able to do in the next 10, 20, 50 or 100 years.
We already have the technology to do cloning. We can make a copy of existing life forms that are just like an identical twin of the original. As of the time I write this, human have not been cloned, but it is generally accepted in the scientific world that we could do it if we wanted to. No one has had the nerve to actually make it happen. But the fact that we can, makes us have to decide if we will or not.
And - we also have the technology not just to clone, but to make genetic improvements. Among these new creations are cantaloupe and yellow squash containing genes from bacteria and viruses, potatoes with chicken and wax moth genes, tomatoes with flounder and tobacco genes, corn with firefly genes, and rice with pea genes. These are essentially new custom life forms that we manufactured. All of this is just the beginning. This is the Frontier of Knowledge and we are just scratching the surface. We are making (what we believe) are better life forms. It's still the same species - but we have made a jump beyond evolution.
So far mankind has to what I would call "Assisted Natural Evolution" which is referred to as breeding. In pure evolution it's all about survival and reproduction, natural selection over billions of years. But thousands of years ago humans started to take control of the evolutionary process by selecting ourselves which animals to breed and we control what individuals survive and reproduce base on our own needs. In many cases we are creating species for the purpose of making them food. This is also true of crops. We have made huge advances in controlling the evolution of plants that we use for food and medicine. But so far we have done it through traditional reproductive means.
Humans are just another animal in the world of genetic engineering. Anything that is possible to do to animals will probably work on humans as well.
With genetic engineering we are changing the rules and speeding up evolution in ways that never could occur naturally. We are combining things that would not otherwise be combinable. This new way is far faster because we don't have to deal in generations and randomness anymore. We can just take the pieces we want and just put them together.
I believe that in the near future, when we can replicate any genetic sequence we want, and when we really understand genetics, we will be able to make any life form we choose with whatever characteristics we want, including custom versions of humans. The genetically superior race of super humans is not too far off in our future, and what we are today might be replaced but what we decide we are going to become, assuming that we make the choice,doesn't happen by accident.
We are already working towards using Gene Therapy to "fix" genetic disorders. If a person has a genetic defect, a gene that "normal" people have that is not functioning correctly, what is the harm in "fixing" it? But - what does fixing mean? Suppose that we can make a fix that improves humans beyond what any human has achieved through evolution. For example, we fix the genetic disorder we all share that causes aging. With the repaired gene we can live to be 150 years old. It might actually reverse the aging process allowing older people to become younger again, or partially younger in some tissues. If that were available today, would I go for it? You bet I would!
The "Borg" from Star Trek
Some people would argue that humans weren't meant to live to be 150 years old. But we are already cheating nature with the technology we have now. If we went back to "natural" we would have to give up all our medical science and we would go back to living half as long. Do we want to do that? I surely don't think so. So I'm not afraid of medical science getting better than it is today --as long as that progress really is better
Getting back on track - what does repairing genetic problems entail and when does it become genetic improvements? And - is that an issue? For example, suppose we could fix a gene that increased the sensitivity of our eyes to light, allowing us to see in the dark the way a cat can. Should we do that? Should we give people that choice? And if we do - that trait might be passed on to future generations. What about stronger bones? With genetic engineering, we might put the penis enlargement industry out of business, and maybe get less junk email. We could add cancer resistance, disease resistance, weight control, cure baldness, color blindness, Alzheimer's, ALS, stronger, taller, faster, smarter ... who can argue with that?
And then - taking it to the next level. What if we start using genes from other species to create humans with claws? Might come in handy if you work for the telephone company and are climbing poles all day. I think a lot of people might choose to have fur. Something like that might make living in Canada more attractive and might eliminate the need for clothing. The ability to digest cellulose might help ease world hunger providing a new source of nutrition. Or - we might even go to the next level and skip animal genes and just design new genes on computers. Once we figure it out, we could build a new form of life that is superior to us. And that life form would then do the same to make something that takes it to the next level.
Would this be a good thing? It sure seems like it. Unless, of course, there is a down side, and will we figure out the down side if there is one? And surely there will be problems that we have to deal with. The Church of Reality has the responsibility of making sure that reality is part of the process and that those who develop this technology think things through as we move forward. We need to ensure that there are safeguards in place so that we don't accidentally do something, like when we created "killer bees", that we are going to regret.
If we can choose what we will become, then let us make the best choice possible.
The technology is coming. Unless we destroy ourselves soon, the decision will be before us. We take the position therefore that it is not too early to start thinking about it and debating it. We can at least make some science fiction movies about it and scare the public into wondering, if we can choose what we will become, what is it that we would want to be. For better or for worse - we will soon have to make that choice. Let us then commit ourselves to that we will make a good choice and that we will put forth the effort to ensure that we choose as carefully as we can to do the right thing.
November 7th is the Day of Self Realization. It is the birthday of the Church of Reality. The Church of Reality appeared in a vision to the First One in the evening of November 7th 1998 while he was smoking a joint and thinking about religion. It came to him that the only true religion would be a religion based on reality, and that there was nothing more real than reality itself. It was as if at that moment that reality became self aware. Reality realized it's own existence, and a religion was formed whereby realists dedicate themselves to the pursuit of reality and dedicate themselves to the Tree.
Where Newton's birthday focuses on science and ideas, The Day of Self Realization focuses on the process of coming up with ideas. We think about the mind and how it works. What is an idea? What is reality itself? Why is there something rather than nothing? How do we know that what we think is real is really real? How do we know that we aren't being tricked or that we are just plain wrong?
The Day of Self Realization is a day where we honor the Principle of Humility, Self Scrutiny, and Wisdom. We wonder about wondering. We ponder pondering. We think about thinking. We try to understand the understanding of understanding. We ask ourselves what out role in reality is and how we fit in society. We ask ourselves if we are doing enough to bring the Sacred Gift to others.
The Day of Self Realization is the Day of the Mind. It's about the tools we have to work with, with which to use to explore reality. Ego treats are prohibited on this day. We think about how much knowledge is out there and how little of it we know. It is a day to look inside ourselves, to examine our disciplines. We wonder about our world and how we see reality and how it is different than how people we know see reality. We wonder if people who see things differently than we do are right and perhaps it is us who are misguided. We put ourselves in the shoes of others and try to understand reality from their perspective and question ourselves to determine if they might be right.
We reflect back on the things we used to believe in and why we believe something differently today. If we were wrong, how did we make the mistake? How much of what we believe in now will turn out to be wrong in the future? We experience reality individually through our minds. This is that day that we work on our mental tools. Long walks alone or other methods of expanding the mind are appropriate. It is a day of quiet reflection.
Here's some links to Atheist organizations for more information about Atheism. Several of these sites contain some really good information about history and flaws in the bible. Information is available showing that Christ probably never existed at all.
So - in the spirit of self scrutiny - I would like to ask the following questions. These questions aren't something that I expect you to give me an answer to - but questions I want you to ask yourselves so as to better understand your own beliefs and perhaps become a "better" Christian. Which raises the question - "What is a better Christian?" So let us start.
Do you believe that the Bible is the word of God, that it has been accurately preserved through the ages, and that everything it says is true?
There are thousands of denominations of Christians. Why do you believe that your denomination is the best one - if you believe that - and can it be improved?
If you realized that a different denomination of Christianity were more accurate than the one you are currently a member of - would you change religions?
Do you consider yourself to be one of the "chosen ones"?
Do you really think that everyone else who isn't a Christian is really going to burn in Hell forever?
Do you think that Armageddon will occur in your lifetime?
Do you believe that questioning what you and your religion believe in is a good thing?
What is the relationship between Christianity and Reality?
If you realized that what you believe in isn't real - would you change to reality or would you stick with what you believe?
Is the social culture of your church consistent with what you believe is your religious teachings?
Why do you think God remains hidden and doesn't have a web site, an email address, or any other direct way to communicate with him? Why do you think God doesn't show up in objective reality?
Do you limit your circle of friends to people of only your own faith?
What is the relationship between science and faith? What do you do if there is a conflict?
Do you consider yourself a "follower" in your religion - or - do you feel you have some ideas to contribute to make your religion better?
Do you believe that science can prove if God does or does not exist?
Do you believe that the Bible and science are in harmony?
If you were in a plane crash and you were the sole survivor - would you believe that God saved your life and let everyone else die? Or - would you believe that God took everyone else home and left you behind?
Do you believe God is an angry god? What is Gods demeanor?
Do you believe that you are here for some special purpose?
If you died tomorrow, how would you want to be remembered? Who would remember you? What accomplishments would you leave behind?
In 100 years when everyone who even knew you is gone - will people still remember who you are? Or do you think you will be forgotten?
Do you believe that Realists serve a useful and productive function in stimulating other religions to think about reality? Do you think that being challenged by Realists on the basis of what is real is a good thing for Christians?
Do you believe that Realism is helpful or threatening to Christianity?
How many other religions have you researched or visited? Do you believe that any of these other religions have something valuable to contribute?
Do you consider the lives and rights of all people everywhere to be equal regardless of race, sex, location, and religious affiliation?
What do you believe is the best relationship between government and religion? Do you think that government should stay out of religion or be dominated by a religion?
Do you believe Christianity is superior to all other religions?
Do you envision that some day everyone in the world will be Christians?
What is your emotional relationship towards people of other religions? Do you feel self righteous indignation or do you feel compassionate understanding?
Do you believe that non-believers are evil or influenced by evil - and should therefore be avoided?
Do you think that's there's any chance that your religion is just plain wrong and that you are being duped?
Do you think that there are other religions who call themselves Christian who are in fact cults?
How do you tell the difference between "True Christians" and "Fake Christians"?
What is the relationship between "faith" and "works"? Isn't what you do a real indicator of what you really believe?
If God knows the future - and what is going to happen has already been decided - do you think that praying will "Change God's Mind" persuading him to grant you a favor?
When you look around at people of other religions and to see how convinced and dedicated they are to their faith - yet from your perspective you know that what they believe isn't real. Likewise - the other person looks at your religion and is equally convinced that they are correct and you are deluded. How do you know that you really are the one who is right - knowing that if you are wrong that you will be equally sure that you are right?
What is your commitment to truth and wisdom? What price are you willing to pay to know the truth? If you became aware that you were living a lie - would you continue to live the lie?
Do you believe that God wants you to know reality the way it really is?
Do you believe there is any reason why the exploration of reality would be a bad thing?
Partly because I pick on everyone. Partly because I'm somewhat ashamed of what Israel is doing and somehow I think that Jews should be above that. You see - the problem with being God's chosen people is that ass holes like me pop up and hold you to a higher standard. If you're God's chosen people - then why can't you make peace with your neighbors? Huh? You guys are making God look really bad here!
It would be more enlightened of me if I were more respectful of other religions and their beliefs. I should treat them with more honor and dignity and act in a more enlightened manner. After all, I am the founder of the Church of Reality - the religion that might eventually become the dominant religion on this planet. Shouldn't I set a better example?
The short answer is - hell no. I am not an enlightened individual. I'm just a fucking ass hole. It's a disability - and I live with it. It's who I really am. I believe in evolution because I'm just the third generation in my family to walk upright. Sometimes I just want to go back to the trees! Being an ass hole keeps me humble and dispels any illusions others might have that I am something special. It also relieves me of the responsibilities of being held to a higher standard. I don't have the burdens of being God's chosen people. I'm just a genius with a bad attitude.
Besides - Why shouldn't I look down my nose at all these other stupid religions? They all look down their noses at me! I want to indulge in a little self-righteousness too! A little moral masturbation never hurt anyone. What makes me SUPERIOR is that I'm more HUMBLE than they are - and proud of it!
Christianity is as much based on culture as it is on dogma. Christian culture is rooted in the belief that you're better than everyone else. That because Christians are forgiven, they are "washed in the blood of the lamb". They are chosen, going to Heaven, while the rest of us are going to burn in Hell. Christians are "morally superior" to the rest of us because "God is on their side" and the rest of us are "tools of Satan" we are "unclean" and we are "evil" while they are "clean" and "good". They believe the bottom line is, "we're good, they're evil" and therefore the rest of us are below subhuman heathens. And they will tell you this to your face. And it's ok if they do it, but if someone says that "Christianity is a cult for weak minded people" -- My God! You're persecuting Christ!
Since Christians are the chosen ones and they speak for God, then what they believe defines what it "moral" and what is "immoral". This has little to do with actual ethics, but there is some overlap. Murder is generally considered a bad thing in all cultures. Atheists and Realists agree with that. But sex is considered immoral outside the context of Christian marriage, and in the case of Catholics, outside the context of reproduction. Sex is not a form of amusement to Catholics and is look upon as a necessary evil to repopulate the planet. Birth control is also considered a sin to many Christian cults. Christians fail to realize that if sex were limited to the context of Christianity, the human race would have become extinct, which would however eliminate sin and keep God from getting pissed off.
Christians go to church mostly for the purpose of reinforcing their beliefs in their own self-righteousness and moral superiority. There they can show off their "faith" in front of their fellow worshipers and participate in cult membership rituals so that they can feel secure that they are an accepted member of their tribe. It allows them to reaffirm their beliefs through mutual ego masturbation, where members reaffirm to each other that they are God's chosen few. People speak in gibberish (tongues) and tell stories of miracles that never happened. It's pretty scary stuff when you realize that these people are really sharing a mass mental illness ritual that is further separating them from the real world and causing them to believe things and behave in ways that have no basis in reality whatsoever.
Control issues are something that is going to be a challenge for me. Like everyone else, I like being in charge. It means that I get to get my way. On the other hand it means that I'm going to have to deal with a lot of crap from everyone. People are going to be pushing me to go in directions that I don't want to go in. There will be ego battles. People getting offended because I didn't reply to their email. People getting offended because I didn't even read their email. Christians who want to save my soul. Muslims will want to have me killed. The news media will demonize me if I'm lucky enough to get them interested enough to demonize me. This is going to be a lot of hard work.
One of the key elements will be finding the right people early on who really get the idea of what this church is about, and have the talent to help make it happen. I'm hoping to be able to delegate control to the right people, yet I fear losing control and the early church falling victim to infighting or getting pushed off track over gay issues, race issues, politics, vegans, or other things that have nothing to do with the mission of the Church of Reality. I'm going to make mistakes. I'm going to piss people off and in some cases it will be my fault. There will be things that I could have handled better and mistakes will be made. I'm trying to go into this without a big ego though and not claiming supernatural inspiration.
One thing to keep in mind is that the Church of Reality is about reality, not about Marc Perkel. So if I get caught in a motel with a hooker then that's just about me. Reality itself isn't changed by that. I am not the spokesperson or the vicar of an omnipotent power. I didn't invent reality, reality invented me. So for the record, I apologize in advance to the people I am about to offend and ask in advance for your forgiveness and understanding for the things I'm going to do wrong. Now that I have pre-apologized, I can go ahead and screw up.
Everyone has a brain and brains are generally similar. Different people have different abilities both physically and mentally. For example, when I see Olympic gymnasts and compare them to what I can do physically, what they can do almost looks superhuman to me. When it comes to art and music, I can't even comprehend how to even start. If I were given the task to completely clean and organize my apartment, I don't know if I could do it. I don't read well because I'm dyslexic and I have some attention problems. My brain is so full that in order to learn something new I have to forget something to make room for it.
But for some reason I seem to have a talent for seeing the big picture. I can see the forest from within the trees as the saying goes. My ability to do that to the degree that I do, seems to be rare to the point of scary. Why am I inventing the Church of Reality? Why isn't it already here? Why isn't it obvious? I mean - now that you've heard of it - Church of Reality - a religion based on believing in what's real - it's obvious now. So why am I the first person in the history of the world to take it this far? To me this is spooky. I don't want to be the smartest being in the universe anymore. (kidding!) But on a more serious note - there have got to be some other people out there who can do what I'm doing even better than me. Whatever it is that I do needs to be understood and replicated. It is really clear to me that there are not enough big thinkers in the world and whatever it is that is unusual about me, I think it can be learned. So go learn it.
One who is inclined to literal truth and pragmatism.
A practitioner of artistic or philosophic realism.
realist
n 1: a philosopher who believes that universals are real and exist independently of anyone thinking of them 2: a person who accepts the world as it literally is and deals with it accordingly 3: a painter who represents the world realistically and not in an idealized or romantic style
We now know that all religions are relative to their foundations. Lets take a look at this and see what this means to us in our quest for reality the way it really is. I am again going to pick on the Christians because I'm more familiar with them. I know Judaism too, but they don't take their holy books as seriously as Christians do. At least not the Jews I'm familiar with, and the ones who do take it really serious, I don't care to meet them.
How do we know if we are right or if they are right? There is a lot of text out on the Internet by Christian authors claiming that God and the Bible are the real absolute truth and that the rest of us are engaging in Relativism, that we are being irresponsible with reality and that we are therefore immoral because we shun their truth and take the position that reality is whatever we want it to be. Our position is that God and the Bible are fiction and their reality is relative to their fictional beliefs and therefore they are just flat out wrong. So - who is right, us - or them?
Christianity is supposedly based on the Bible. The Bible defines God and everything we know about God comes from the Bible. The Bible is the sole source of information about God and the Bible claims to be the word of God. There are no other books that God wrote. So the Bible and God are supported only by a circular reference. That in itself is highly suspect.
Through the Bible God demands blind faith from his followers. If you believe, all sins are forgiven, except for the one unforgivable sin which is to doubt. In order to believe you have to suspend all logic and reason because if you doubt you will lose eternal life in paradise and be thrown into eternal punishment. God remains hidden perhaps as a test of faith because if you have proof then you won't have faith. It's only through the suspension of logic and reason that you are saved.
The Bible has a LOT of things in it that are inconsistent with reality. But these are easily explained away. Whatever the Bible says, it could mean anything else. For example, a day to God could be 1000 years. Therefore, the Bible can be adjusted to say whatever you wish. This is why there are tens of thousands of Christian denominations.
And if changing the meaning of words doesn't get it, then there's the omnipotence factor. God is all powerful, can perform any miracle, is far smarter than you and he is beyond your comprehension, and Satan is controlling you making you have doubt. How do you argue with that?
Unlike most religions, the Church of Reality is unburdened with the challenge of having to defend ancient holy texts. Our assumptions are far more modest and reasonable.
In contrast, the Church of Reality does not rely on ancient fiction. We have no Bible to defend. Our base assumptions are far more modest and logical. We assume that we exist. We choose to explore reality. We choose positive evolution over extinction. We have to work as a community to best explore reality. We embrace doubt and self scrutiny. We commit to changing our minds if we discover that we are wrong. This is a far cleaner place to come from as a starting point.
In fact, I would argue that it is nearly impossible for the Church of Reality to be wrong because even if the Christians are 100% right and the Bible actually is the word of God then the Church of Reality will eventually figure that out and we will all become Christians. Unless of course God hates Realists because of the doubt thing and that God will allow Satan to trick us into never finding our way to salvation. In that situation, all I can say is that we were tricked by God and we did the best we could under the circumstances.
The Church of Reality relies on doubt to strengthen our faith. What this means is our earned faith. How do we know this is a real religion and not just the rantings of one person? How do we know if we are on the right path? People often ask the question, "Won't the Church of Reality degenerate over time just like all the other religions have? What is different about this church from all other churches?"
What gives the Church of Reality the strength to stay on course is that we embrace doubt and scrutiny. Questioning everything that we stand for is mandated. Blind faith is prohibited. If this religion ever stoops to blind faith then it can be assumed that is has degenerated and must be abandoned. It is through doubt that we earn the faith of our members. We are trusted only to the extent that we are trustworthy. Yes - this church will make mistakes, but we will fix those mistakes as they are discovered. We will remain faithful to our commitment to reality the way it really is.
Knowledge must always be under review not only for mistakes, but for a deeper understanding of what we know. For example, 200 years ago we knew what gravity was. But today we know what gravity is on a whole new level. In 200 more years gravity will mean much more than it does today. This is also true for the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality. What we have written is merely the first draft of the Sacred Principles. It is a starting place for them from where to evolve forward. I believe that the Sacred Principles are a sound start in the birth of this new religion. But I would think that they are at best grossly incomplete and that in the future that we will have better sacred principles that are far beyond where we are today.
I admit that there may very well be more than “seven major arguments” for the pure-myth position, and that in some instances the arguments presented here partially overlap. Also, many of the same arguments can be used to support position three. However, I have, perhaps arbitrarily, outlined the following seven arguments for the reader’s consideration:
No one seemed to have noticed Jesus in his time.
The Gospels were not written by eyewitnesses.
The gospels are entirely fictional, pure myths.
What we now call “Christianity” existed long before Jesus’ time. It was derived from earlier “scripture” and more ancient myths.
Paul, writing earlier than the gospels, clearly spoke of a “spiritual” Christ. He knew nothing of a real, live human Jesus.
There is no agreement at all concerning this putative historical Jesus’ looks, lineage, biography, character, moral worthiness, or even his central message.
The “you-can’t-have-it-both-ways” argument.
Again, the combination of all the arguments and opinions outlined in support of the above points will not absolutely “prove” that there was no historical Jesus. Logicians tell us it is impossible to absolutely prove a negative. It might be possible that there was a “real” William Tell who served as the inspiration for, and may have even engaged in some of the activities ascribed to the legendary Swiss folk hero. However, the great preponderance of the evidence we have at this time argues very strongly against this possibility. I believe that position four, described above, is an exact parallel to the pure myth claim for William Tell. The same claim might also be made about any of the long list of crucified saviors that have “visited” earth long before the beginning of the first century of this era. My claim is, in other words, that applying “Ockham’s razor,” (e.g. the simplest, most logical explanation that comports with all the known facts), and considering the tremendous dearth of evidence to the contrary, the most rational conclusion is that there never was an historical Jesus. Further, I contend that he, and consequently all that is said about him, are entirely fictional.
Now that I’ve made that exceedingly clear, let’s get on with the arguments, one by one.
The mind is an imperfect tool. It's not a computer. It's hard wired to survive and do the things it needs to do to make that happen. Logic is something that is really learned, and can be learned wrong. And logic is only as good as the information that you trust. So the accuracy of what you believe isn't as much a function of how smart you are, but what information you trust. That's why cults are filled with smart people who really should know better, but yet they don't.
If you start with bad information and apply logic to it, then you get the logical conclusion based on the bad information you started with. That's why religious scholars argue about how many angels can sit on the head of a pin, but ignore the question of if angels really exist. They accept it on faith because it is required to be part of the group.
In the Church of Reality we have a concept that seems to be unique to religions called the Tree of Knowledge. Well, the term isn't unique, but we took what applied to a fictional tree from the mythical Garden of Eden and redefined it to mean the sum total of all human understanding. The Tree of Knowledge represents our shared knowledge. But the entire tree isn't accessible to every person, although the Internet is bringing more of the Tree of Knowledge to the individual than ever before. We only have the capacity to experience the Tree of Knowledge from a local perspective and within the limits of our finite brains.
The Tree of Knowledge is not pure truth. In fact it is polluted with a lot of bad information. The Tree is a product of evolution. Evolution does a reasonably good job in many ways, but it is far from a perfect process. Some processes, like science, are extremely accurate. Other processes like Religion are extremely inaccurate. I think everyone can agree with that statement because every other religion on the planet is totally screwed up except yours. Nearly 100% of people would agree that the majority of the world is religiously misled.
The Tree of Knowledge is a mathematical tree, not a mythical plant. Knowledge is interconnected through groups that form around specific items of information. Let's take medical knowledge for example. The Tree of Knowledge contains all medical information, but how is that organized? Medical knowledge is a vast segment in the Tree of Knowledge. It incorporates vast amounts of information. It is mostly the work of doctors and medical researchers who work to discover new things. The medical field is divided into specialities like cancer, the brain, DNA, diet, vision, heart, lungs, etc. all of which contain huge amounts of information and organization themselves.
The medical community contains millions of individuals, but how are they organized? Are these people just random people working autonomously? Not at all. They are organized into teams of people who are working collectively. They are in hospitals, research labs, universities, government, and they are organized into small societies that are formed around accomplishing specific tasks like finding a cure for cancer, or emergency care, or a neighborhood clinic. The groups themselves are organized into larger groups with groups becoming members of larger groups forming very complex and interdependent associations. These groups form and interconnect for primarily one real purpose, to share knowledge and to link the minds of individuals into a super mind that allows people working together to accomplish things that are far greater than any individual could accomplish working alone.
As you can see looking around, everything we see that is made by humans comes from an extremely complex infrastructure of groups of people that are all interconnected through various levels of societies. All this stuff, your computer, your home, your furniture, appliances, car, planes, roads, all of it. The computer that you are using to read the Church of Reality web site represents the combined work of millions of people. Somehow these millions of people came together to produce your computer. In reality it's billions because you also have to consider the people who produce the advanced materials that the computer is made from, the trucks that shipped the computer to you, the stores that sold you the computer, the nations that provided the social infrastructure. If not for all of that working together, you wouldn't have a computer to surf the web with.
Humans are like bees. We are all part of the hive mind.
The very essence of who we are as individuals and as a society comes from our ability to function in groups. We are as interconnected as a hive of bees. In reality perhaps more interconnected. Because we are so interconnected and we are so dependent on others for our information, and because individually, our minds can not process all the information that we are dependent upon, we have to delegate through trust that other people will figure out how to take care of the areas that they are entrusted to take care of. We are dependent on them and they are dependent on us.
Because society is so complex, we are required to take in information on trust that we can't process ourselves. There just aren't enough hours in the day to think about everything. So what we believe isn't a result of logical processes, but a result of what information we choose to trust. And the information we choose to trust comes from our local connection to the Tree of Knowledge. That local connection is based on our "place in society" which is what groups we plug into or are associated with. Our view of reality is distorted through the lens of our local reality and who we associate with. We attach through groups and we add our individuality to the group, yet we also surrender part of ourselves as well. If the group makes a mistake then it becomes part of us.
Because our brains must link into the group mind, most of us have evolved, for better or worse, to put the group conclusions ahead of our own. After all, one might ask, how can all these people be wrong? If this were wrong, surely someone would have figured it out. Can billions of people over thousands of years all be fooled by an ancient fictional story? As it turns out - yes they can. The fact that there are multiple fictional stories with billions of followers proves that. But it is so disappointing to realize that we humans are such a gullible species.
Our mission is to spread the importance of reality everywhere, to think about reality, to talk about reality, to allow reality to transform our being. Every time we mention the word Reality we spread the Sacred Message. We are here to ask the Sacred Question - "What is Real?" We want people to consider reality when making important decisions. By spreading the Sacred Message we cause people to be Real in the Sacred Moment (which is Now). Our mission is to say "Reality" as many times as we can and to get other people to think about reality as often as we can. We want people to be more realistic in their daily lives and to spend more time every day wondering about what is really real.
Believers believe that their beliefs lead to moral certainty and gives society a clear set of rules to follow that everyone understands. In fact the opposite is true. Believers accuse realists of having their own individual realities and use their freedoms as a thinly veiled excuse to selfishly commit sin and pursue a life of material wealth. They believe instead that everyone should follow the one, true path to salvation or enlightenment. Sounds like a simple solution except for one little problem. They aren't offering a true path to follow.
Just as realists have personal reality, or rather personal experiences of realities, believers have personal fiction. All believers believe something different. In order to create moral certainty you have to start out with something that is purported to be certain, then you test it to see if it's moral. But believers haven't gotten past the first step of putting some sort of belief system on the table to test.
Before the idea of imposing biblical law can be taken seriously, Christianity has to first agree on what the Bible means.
Christians, for example, put forth the Bible and say that this should be the reference book for moral certainty. But the Bible is extremely self contradictory and imprecise and everyone has their own interpretation of what the Bible says. The fact that there are over 10,000 denominations of Christians proves my point. If those who are promoting the Bible can't agree on what it means then how are we heathens going to figure it out?
Believers have a poor record when it comes to morality. Collectively, history is full of atrocities committed in the name of God. These atrocities continue today. Islam is a religion that is far too comfortable with brutal murder. In the Church of Reality it is a moral certainty that stoning people to death is absolutely wrong under all circumstances. The Church of Reality challenges Islam to agree with us. Many religions believe that it is acceptable to murder people who believe what they believe. Many Christians are comfortable with it. We in the Church of Reality assert that it is a moral certainty that killing people because they don't believe what you believe is morally wrong. We challenge believers to agree with us.
If God is telling you to kill someone, you aren't talking to God. Many of the holy books that fiction based religions rely upon are filled to brutal murder that is religiously justified. The "good guys" are doing the murdering. God is depicted as a mass murderer and is glorified for his insanity. And this is the model that we realists are supposed to accept as moral certainty? We don't think so!
We in the Church of Reality challenge believers to make reality part of your quest for moral certainty.
We in the Church of Reality believe that you won't get to the truth by living the lie. We believe that the quest for moral certainty has to be rooted in reality and has to be reality based. We have made it one of our Sacred Missions to ask the sacred moral question which is: what is the right thing to do based on reality. We believe that it is a moral certainty that the exploration of right and wrong and law should be based upon reality as opposed to fiction. We believe that morality should be debated and explored and that reality should be integral to the moral debate. We believe that taking reality into consideration will more likely lead to a better decision about morality than if reality is ignored. We therefore challenge all religions to make the consideration of reality part of their process in the quest for moral certainty.
Some people wonder if the Church of Reality is trying to undermine religion. It is not. But we believe that it is our duty to expose religion to the light of reality and challenge belief systems on the basis of what's real. We believe that these challenges that get people to think will help religions evolve in better versions that will in fact improve their religious experience.
Most all religions make a claim that what they believe is real, that reality is a necessary element in their faith. People state that if it wasn't real that they wouldn't continue to believe in it. On the basis of evoking reality we feel it is morally justified to assist in their quest for what is real. Perhaps if a religion totally denounced reality and wanted to have nothing to do with it that might make a difference. But once a religion claims reality then they are open to the laws of reality which includes scientific accountability, the purification of truth through scrutiny, and the application of logic and reason to the belief systems to see if what is claimed to be real is in fact real.
We in the Church of Reality are explorers exploring the reality that we seem to exist in. We are on a quest for the truth. Therefore if a religion has truth and a grip on reality then we want to learn it. If a religion actually has it right then we not only want to discover it, but adopt it and benefit from it. Even build upon it. If a religion has it wrong then that becomes something that we can learn from as well and in the process of interacting with them we both hopefully will learn more and both come out ahead.
We don't really respect other people's religions. We just pretend to respect other religions because it's the politically correct thing to do.
We believe in evolution, not just in a Darwinian sense but the evolution of religions themselves. As we look back through history we can see how religions have evolved over the centuries and in many ways are quite different than they used to be. Religions change over time. Generally most of the changes are for the better. We have to assume that religions will continue to evolve in the future so no matter what your denomination believes today, much of it will change in the future. But what will your religion change into? Will your religion evolve forward in the Sacred Direction or will it become extinct? That all depends on the choices that each denomination makes. We as realists believe that reality is good for the evolution of all faiths.
To survive and to thrive is often a balance of opposing forces. Humanity has a tendency to be selfish as well as selfless. We are by nature self interested and we want the best for ourselves individually. We have both individual needs and community needs. Sometimes they work together, sometimes they don't. How do we balance the needs of the individual against the needs of the community?
If we were a hive of bees, then only the community would matter. For bees work only for the common good and the individual is disposable. Worker bees work themselves to death, literally in about 6 weeks. Fortunately, we humans aren't like that. Much of our strength is collective, but much of it is also individual. And it is in our collective best interest to protect and defend our individuality.
We distinguish the term self-interest from greed and selfishness which mean about the same thing. Self-interest is the interest in the well-being of the self. Selfishness and greed involve the taking of more than one's "fair share". Three kids have 12 cookies to share. Each kid has a self-interest in getting 4 cookies. But if one kid eats 6 cookies, he's selfish.
Some people say that everything everyone does is selfish and therefore humanity is either evil by nature, as believers express it, or that humanity is naturally greedy as Objectivists like to believe. But there is a difference between looking out for your self-interest and wanting more than your fair share. And one can easily make an argument that everything has a self-interest component.
For example, I am generous because I gain from my generosity. Even if I don't gain directly, I believe it helps humanity in general, so I gain in the long run. It make me feel good. Believers can be viewed as totally self-interested. They aren't generous, they are just afraid of going to Hell. It's like an investment in a retirement program where it costs you a little in this life for a huge return in the next life. And there's no way to argue the point because any act no matter how selfless it might seem, can always be deemed to have a self-interest component, if nothing more than a desire to prove to someone that you can be totally selfless.
But it's no surprise that it's human nature to look after one's own hide and it's natural to do so. Children start out very selfish because they haven't learned anything about community. Selfishness often comes from short-term thinking. It's about what's good for me now, not what's good for me in the long-run. So since children haven't learned about community and long-term thinking, they often act more self-interested than their wiser adults.
Too much selflessness can also be a problem where the individual sacrifices themselves too much for what they see as the common good. Sometimes these people don't look at the long-term view that their own personal interests are important to keep themselves in good condition to be a strong healthy member of society. They don't realize that their goal of long term selflessness is actually impeded by their short term selflessness.
Sometimes people surrender their individualism thinking that merging into a group mind will be of community benefit, but it is often our individualism that creates the intellectual diversity that keeps the group on track. One's self-interest is sometimes in the community interest in the long run, and the community interest is often the best way to take care of yourself. Sometime a little capitalistic greed is a good motivator to get people to invent great things so that they get a personal reward. Selfishness isn't all bad and altruism isn't all good. Selfish Altruism might be the best way to describe the position of the Church of Reality as a religion. Our generosity serves our self interest.
The Church of Reality doesn't accept the false dichotomy that self interest and altruism are opposites. Our position is to apply wisdom to the situation and try to determine the best solution. The issues of fairness and what is the right way to live varies widely from situation to situation and from person to person. It is not a problem that is solved with a few simple rules. Sometimes conflicting interests can be resolved by coming up with a new solution. We in the Church of Reality have the Principle of Wisdom to express our expectation that we use our logic and reason and taking reality into account to come up with a solution that works. We are an innovative religion and if there's a solution to a problem we are going to figure it out.
Although this church was a Marijuana inspired idea, this church neither encourages the use of Marijuana nor discourages it. The use of Marijuana is not part of any Church of Reality functions or rituals.
The Church of Reality in general discourages drug use. But specifically we encourage people to be smart about drug use. There are advantages and disadvantages associated with each drug and different drugs affect different people in different ways. There are people who can drink constantly and still be what appears to be totally normal. I am not one of them. I can drink a glass of wine and I'm fine. If I drink more than 2, I'm regretting it. Just because smoking pot works for me doesn't mean that it's going to work for you and I smoke very little pot and only occasionally. Any substance done to excess is a bad idea.
Like anything, you have to use good judgment when it comes to using drugs. If something isn't working for you and the downside is interfering with your life or health, don't do it. And never do any drugs just because your friends are doing it and you want to fit in. Always research the substances that you are considering so that you understand what you are doing. And especially stay away from anything that is addictive. You don't even want to be dependent on something as harmless as coffee.
Out here in the real world we have a way to distinguish between what's real and what isn't. It's called science. It relies on testing and proof. It invites scrutiny. It is doubt based. It specifically excludes faith, and it's a process that works. To exclude proof is to exclude science and to exclude science is to exclude knowing reality. Reality exists on it's own without any need to be believed in. But to know reality involves scientific discovery, doubt, scrutiny, accountability, and questioning. Can someone find reality by other means than science? Perhaps so. You could, for example, take a wild guess and just happen to guess right. But is that a way of knowing reality? Not at all, because if you take a guess and it turns out you are right, you will never know if you were right until it is scientifically proven.
Reality exists on it's own with or without understanding. Reality itself doesn't care if we get it right or wrong. But if we want to get it right, then we need a way to discern what's true from what isn't. And the only way to do that is to prove it. Proof is the only way that we can know if something is real or isn't real. Guessing isn't knowing. Making up fiction isn't knowing. Divine inspiration isn't knowing, because you don't really know if God is talking to you or if something pretending to be God (like your imagination) is talking to you.
To declare something real is to declare that it's provable by science, or that it will at least some day be proved by science to be real. Until then, it might still be real, but it will just be a guess. The declaration of reality evokes proof and since faith specifically excludes proof, then faith excludes the understanding of reality. Faith puts what is real and what is unreal on the same level. Required faith excludes proof and denies verification. It relies on the idea that there are real things that we are prohibited from knowing by deities that don't want us to be too smart. Deities that would deny us the understanding of reality. It depends on if there exist truths that can't be questioned.
Fundamentalist Atheist: There is no God, and anyone who thinks there is a God is a misguided and dangerous fool.
Evangelical Atheist: It is not sufficient that there is no God. We must do our best to make sure that nobody even believes that there is one.
Theological Atheist: The principles of logic demonstrate the absence of any omnipotent and omniscient being in the universe.
Adolescent Atheist: Since I am a teenager, I know everything, and I know there is no God. The fact that many adults think that there is a God proves my case.
Scientific Atheist: There is no God because I cannot create a falsifiable hypothesis concerning His existence.
Social Atheist: Well, everyone I know and respect is an atheist, so there must be something to it.....
Campus Atheist: I need attention, and also to feel important, and I can get these things by being obnoxious about the existence of God.
Politically Correct Atheist: God has a consistent history of discrimination on gender, racial and cultural grounds, therefore must be banned from existing.
Closet Atheist: There are no good reasons for believing in God, but what harm can there be?
Lethargic Atheist: Religion is such a hassle, why bother?
Paranoid Atheist: Religion - sounds like another conspiracy, along with the aliens, the dolphins and the CIA - they’re all out to get me!
Nihilistic Atheist: Life has no point, and the existence of a god would invalidate this, so it is obviously not true.
Puritanical Atheist: We shall smite the evil believers in nonsense, and continue our purge until not one theist is left alive...
Philosophical Atheist: I don't believe, therefore I am.
Where a religious right can be asserted to override state law for religious reasons, the Church of Reality asserts the right to choose abortion as a fundamental practice of our religion. We reject the notion that society has the right to force women to bear children against their will. The choice of the individual to reproduce or not is a recognized religious right in the Church of Reality.
Dishonesty can spread like a cancer through a religion or culture. We live in a world where we are constantly surrounded by lies, deceit, and deception. It's almost mind numbing to think about. We are surrounded by people who are living the lie. People who are so divorced from reality that they don't know and don't even care what reality is. We live in a society of constant scams where people are promised an afterlife in exchange for slavery to a church in this life. So many lives dedicated to the meaningless pursuit of fictional deities serving the selfish interests of institutions that are little more than parasites sucking the life out of the human race and putting us on the Path of Destitution and Destruction.
The Church of Reality finds that the Tamaqua School District of Tamaqua, PA. has violated the religious rights and liberties of all church members in that school district through the imposition of their school uniform policy. The Church of Reality has determined that:
The School District, a public school system, has implemented a school uniform policy requiring students to wear the uniforms prescribed by the district.
The School District has a policy allowing students to opt out of the uniform policy based on religious objections.
The School Board was presented with a letter signed by the First One of the Church of Reality stating that it was within the rights of Realists to refuse school uniforms based on the Sacred Principles.
The School Board refused to recognize the religious rights of Realists and insisted the Children of Reality wear the uniforms of the state.
The School Board made it clear to the Children of Reality that they would be suspended if they appeared in school and they were not wearing the uniform.
The School Board granted a religious exemption to at least one other religion but not to Realists and Christians.
The School Board has refused to grant a religious exemption to Christian denominations who have asserted their religious rights.
After exchanging email with members of the board, the Church of Reality has determined that the Tamaqua School District is violating the religious freedoms of Realists in its school district. The Church declares:
That the Principle of Freedom allows members to choose to refuse to wear school uniforms.
That the Church's policy on Individualism makes it clear that it is church doctrine that school uniforms threaten individuality and free thinking and undermine the culture of diversity necessary for positive evolution.
That Realists are within their religious rights to choose to refuse to put the Children of Reality in school uniforms.
That the First One agrees with this choice while recognizing that the individual has the right to make this choice even if the First One did not agree with it.
That the School Board lacks the power, authority, and wisdom to interpret religious doctrine and that the individual member of a religion is more familiar with their own religion, which includes personal beliefs, than the School Board is. It is up to the individual and the Church, not the state, to determine the meaning of religious doctrine.
That the School Board is practicing religious discrimination against the Children of Reality and their Christian neighbors in refusing to recognize their religious rights while recognizing the rights of members of other religions.
I remember as a kid seeing pictures of children in Communist countries like Russia, China, and Cuba where children were being raised and supposedly brainwashed by the Communist states. This was in contrast to children in the United States who were being raised to be free. The difference between the free children and the Communist children was that the Communists all wore uniforms and the free children wore whatever they wanted. These school uniforms make America look Communist. That's not the way the Children of Reality should be raised.
In light of this determination, the Church of Reality urges the School Board to follow it's own written policy and to apply the policy equally to members of all religions. The Church of Reality also recognizes the rights of the members of all religions asserting a religious right against the compulsory uniform policy to refuse to send their children to public schools and to join with us to take the necessary steps to enforce our rights to freedom of religion.
The down side to execution is that sometimes you may execute the innocent. Although we like to think this is rare, it isn't. It is far too common. We have the illusion that our court systems are fair and just and that the legal system produces accurate results. The problem is in reality justice is more like a shotgun than like a laser. It is at best imprecise and often highly corrupt and abused. As a result, innocent people are wrongly convicted and executed. Some nation-states impose death for trivial crimes. In southeast Asian countries you can be executed for possessing small amounts of drugs. In Muslim countries women are often stoned to death for sexual behavior. America allows prosecutors to make deals with prisoners to get them to lie against an accused person who they want to convict in exchange for a lighter sentence.
The death penalty costs too many innocent lives to be justifiable.
In a corrupt judicial environment one has to weigh the rights of the families of murder victims against the rights of the families of the people who are wrongly executed by the state. also, to decide if the incremental advantage of execution over life in prison is worth the cost of putting the innocent to death. We have concluded that clearly it is not. That the lives of the innocent are not sufficient to justify executing the guilty.
What about moral values? What does Reality have to do with Morality? Without a God, how do you discern right from wrong?
That's where reality as a religion separates itself from reality as a science. As a religion we are dedicated to the Principle of Positive Evolution. That we are on one planet - that we are all here together - and that we choose to make tomorrow better than today. To us the Tree of Knowledge and the Tree of Life are sacred and we dedicate ourselves to the exploration of reality the way it really is. In order to live our lives the way we have chosen - we have to have a sense of right and wrong based on building a strong functional society in accordance with the Sacred Principles. It is one of the Sacred Moral Missions to ask if any rules or laws or moral principles are really in the best interests of society and are fair and just.
The Church of Reality accepts certain Axioms which form the basis for our moral code. We choose a world view that our existence is important to us and that we are to thrive and to progress and to evolve forward in a sane healthy society where we can all live together in harmony and explore our existence. These axioms form the basis for the Sacred Principles which define our moral code and allows us to distinguish right and wrong.
Our morality comes from wisdom and hard work. We make the effort to figure it out and make careful choices based on realistic concepts. We don't have a "sacred book" where some ancient prophet declared morality based on his personality. But the Sacred Moral Question is very much a part of this religion.
But other religions have a lot of the same moral values as the Church of Reality. Why start a new religion?
Yes - many religions came to the same moral conclusions based on reality as the Church of Reality did. But often religions rely of "Holy Books" and bad cultural habits to define morality in terms that are unrealistic and unjust. For example - Christians and Jews consider the Sabbath to be a holy day putting it in the same list as murder and stealing. They have commandments about having no other gods so that their invisible guy in the sky is exclusive to everyone else's invisible guy in the sky. Religions tend to be very irresponsible when it comes to issues of war and peace. Although they give lip service to being against murd, Muslims will put you to death for sexual crimes.
Many other religions are male dominate in their beliefs and culture. The Church of Reality considers people to be equal, giving the same rights and responsibilities to everyone without regard to gender. The Church of Reality doesn't rely on ancient texts to tell us what to do. We have the responsibility of having to figure it out for ourselves and to put out the effort to get it right and fix it is it's broken. In other religions - if the sacred text has it wrong - it stays wrong. We are always looking for the better way.
Different religions have different world views and are involved either directly or indirectly in trying to influence nation states to transform to their world view. Islam controls many countries in the Middle East and their laws reflect the Islamic world view. That's why women have to be covered and are routinely executed by stoning for sexual crimes. The Jewish religion controls Israel and they believe that God gave them this property. Christians see themselves as having a mandate of world domination and are actively trying to infiltrate government at every level to impose a Christian world view on all societies. As Realists, we want to see reality as the basis for government.
It is important to compete for political influence because the world views of other religions are not only harmful to Realists but harmful to the members of their own faiths. Their religions are based on their holy books and many of their holy books see the future of the human race in the destruction of the world by God. Many people hold a world view that the worse the world gets, the better it is because we are closer to the fulfillment of the end-of-the-world fantasy that they believe in. They actively support the destruction of civilization as a sign of the "end of time" and the beginning of the Apocalypse. They await the Rapture where God is going to snatch them up into Heaven before inflicting his wrath upon the planet in a sadistic orgy of eternal torture of those who committed the unforgivable sin of having the wrong opinion.
Our goal is to make sure that the world doesn't end in our lifetime.
Yes - there are people who actually believe this bullshit and many of them are in power. In fact, they are making a move to take over the United States right now. A Christian cult that calls itself Dominionist is working to destroy civilization in preparation for the end of the world. It is our job as Realists to ensure that they fail to accomplish their mission.
The threat of a Christian Dominionist cult ruling the world is one of the strongest motivators that inspired the creation of the Church of Reality.
Our world view is based on Positive Evolution. We see the future in terms of society growing and becoming better. We are committed to making tomorrow better than today, and to helping other religions embrace the concepts of reality so that their faiths evolve in a positive direction. If we don't win then they will and the world will end in destruction, but there is no Jesus and no Rapture and all that they will accomplish is that the cockroaches will become the dominant life form on this planet. We, as Realists, want to make sure that humans stay in control. That's our political agenda. We can not allow the Extinctionists to prevail.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Pledges undermine accountability and scrutiny of the State by the citizen owners of the State. A pledge implies that the citizen will remain loyal to the State regardless of the behavior of the State in the course of its duty to serve the people. This act of state dominance has a chilling affect on those who would stand up to acts of injustice by government and prevent citizens from acting to stop the government from committing illegal acts.
One of the Church of Reality's sacred principles is the Principle of Scrutiny. We are a doubt based religion that believe strongly in scrutiny and accountability. We believe that without accountability we run the risk of corruption and we hold as one of our religious beliefs, that humans make mistakes and that through scrutiny and accountability we can correct those mistakes. It is our position that state sponsored patriotism discourages scrutiny and public criticism and inhibits the nation-state from healing itself. This diminishes the nation and undermines the efforts of true patriots to build an ethical society that is responsible to the people.
Since state sponsored patriotism undermines true patriotism, we have to take the side of patriotism in substance rather than patriotism in form. We are, after all, the Church of Reality. To deny us real patriotism and require false patriotism forced us to live the lie.
If everyone has ownership rights to themselves, their lives, their choices, then it's logical to assume that if everyone's rights are the same, that we have to respect the rights of others. In order to expect rights, we have to be able to give rights. To expect others to honor our intrinsic value, we have to honor the intrinsic value of others.
The Church of Reality is based upon the idea that we are one planet, that we are all here together, and that we have to figure out how to get along with each other. We need a peaceful society where we can work together for the purpose of exploring reality as it really is and the positive evolution of the human race. In order to do this people must be secure in their own rights and freedoms and have a sense that every individual has intrinsic value even if we don't agree with each other. We also assume that the rights of people are the same so that whatever rights we expect, we have to respect those same rights for other people, even if we personally feel that other people don't deserve the same rights as people like us.
Humanity has the ability to share knowledge. We call our shared knowledge the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of human understanding. The human race is totally interdependent on our collective information. How is this information stored, communicated, and distributed? It's about our use of language both verbal and written. About the means of replicating information through printing, books, audio and video recordings, and the Internet which we call the Golden Router.
What are the dynamics of knowledge. How do we know if something is true or not? How do we know what's real? How do we receive information from the Tree and how do we contribute information to the tree. How can we improve our ability to share information and determine the truth?
The Church of Reality doctrine already covers the use of illegal drugs by church members in general, but recent court decisions regarding the use of medical marijuana have now made necessary a stronger and more specific statement about our position on medical marijuana in particular. This edict is in response to the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Reich v. Gonzales in which the court failed to infer a fundamental right for a person to take measures to alleviate their pain and suffering. They denied the petitioner's bid that, as a matter of law, she has the right to use marijuana to preserve bodily integrity, avoid pain, and preserve her life.
The Constitution provides a right to exercise one's religion, yet not the right to preserve one's own life. We therefore are declaring that preserving one's own life is part of the exercise of our religion.
Governments and Law are part of an evolutionary process. As with our Doctrine, the constitutions of nations are designed to serve the people and to give people as comprehensive a set of rights as they know how to at the time. But also as with our Doctrine, sometimes they leave important rights out and sometimes they just get it wrong. For example, here in the United States it took our nation almost 90 years to realize that black people are humans and to end slavery. It took almost 150 years to recognize that women are humans and have the right to vote. Governments are often slow to respond and the job of the courts is to interpret the law, and not to write the law, even when they know the law is wrong. Fortunately for those of us in the Church of Reality, we are able to more quickly respond to things that just don't make any sense. Our evolution is faster than that of the governments. As it should be.
The courts however have upheld the right to religious freedom under the First Amendment and recognized the strict scrutiny test when it comes to the imposition of federal law on religious freedom. So even though you don't have a Constitutional right to break federal law to fight for your life, you do have a right to break federal law when it comes to your religious rights. Because religious law trumps federal law, we in the Church of Reality are not dependent upon the courts and the legislature to figure out that we have a fundamental religious right to break federal law in order to preserve our lives and avoid pain and suffering. We are legally entitled to grant that right ourselves and therefore we hereby do so. This edict is intended to provide a clear and unambiguous statement as to where this church stands on this issue.
Members of the Church of Reality have an absolute right to use Marijuana for any medical purpose that they see fit regardless of whether or not it is lawful to do so.
The Church of Reality recognizes the vast amount of scientific and medical data in support of the medical use of marijuana and the fact that at this time 10 states have passed laws allowing the use of medical marijuana in spite of it being illegal under federal law. We are not subject to the greed and politics behind the opposition to this harmless drug which is the only reason it remains illegal. Nor do we ignore the fact that thousands of licensed physicians are prescribing marijuana to patients, in some cases advising them that it is worth obtaining marijuana illegally because it has unique properties that no other known substance has.
It was never the intent of drug laws to prevent people from receiving the medications they need.
The Church of Reality in general is a law-abiding religion that recognizes that law and order are necessary for a well functioning and stable society. Likewise, we recognize the real dangers of drug abuse and we have a moral position to be functional members of society and that drug abuse can cause injury to this individual, their family, their community, and the public in general. We recognize that there is a legitimate government purpose to prevent the abuse of narcotics. We support obeying the law even if the law is imperfect, as nothing is perfect, as long as it is reasonable to do so. However, when laws cross the line of reason to the point where the restrictions of law pose a danger to the health and safety of our members then we have both a right and a duty to break the law. Medical marijuana restrictions cross the line where it is unreasonable for us to endure its illogical encumbrances on our religious freedoms.
We cannot pursue the understanding of reality if we have to worry about being arrested over sick people needing medicine.
The Church of Reality is a religion based on the pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is. In order to pursue the understanding of reality, we support the Positive Evolution of the human race so that the expansion of the Tree of knowledge, which represents the sum total of human understanding, can progress. In order to have a stable community, our members have to be secure in their persons and their individual security and liberty must be protected. This includes the person's right to treat their illnesses and alleviate their pain and suffering so that they can recover and be a productive member of society. It is also necessary that other people who are currently healthy are secure in the knowledge that they have access to life-saving drugs without fear of arrest and imprisonment. A Realist is not required to give their life to the government to support a false description of reality that flies in the face of science. Marijuana laws are political laws and have no basis in the real world.
The Church of Reality is also a community of strongly individualistic people who come together as Explorers to explore reality. Our worldview is that this is the only life we have and that we are in control of our Personal Evolution and the writing our own Life Story. Thus we value our religious right to make our own choices and make our own mistakes. In short, we have the right to be wrong. Sometimes people make bad choices, but they are our bad choices to make. Our religious cultural values include the right to be in control of our own lives and to take a higher level of Personal Responsibility for our own choices. This is particularly important when it comes to our health, our bodies, and treating our illnesses. We understand that laws that apply to people in general do not necessarily apply to individuals in particular and that reasonable people can make reasonable exceptions in reasonable circumstances. Thus we respect the right of people to make their own medical decisions because it is after all, their life. The concept of Self Ownership is one of our fundamental values.
The Church of Reality is a unique religious culture in that evolution is central to our core worldview. We pursue reality as a community and the pursuit of reality is an evolutionary process that by definition involves change. We define ourselves as the caretakers of the future of the human race. It is our job to think ahead and be the experimental branch where the important concepts for future generations are developed. It is our task to make people aware that humanity is on the verge of taking control of its own evolution and that we can and should choose to determine what it is that we are going to evolve into. Because this is central to our religious mission, the members of our religion require a greater freedom from the rule of law so that we can explore new directions and correct the mistakes of our past. We in the Church of Reality value Intellectual Tithing where we contribute new ideas to the Tree of Knowledge. New ideas require an environment where individuals are free.
The law allows for exceptions so that religions can evolve, and the evolution of religion allows the law to evolve. The law is dependent on law breakers for its own evolution.
It is our view that the purpose of religious freedom is to create the kind of environment in which humanity can evolve forward. Rigid and inflexible laws lead to rigid and inflexible cultures in which human evolution becomes stagnant and the Tree of Knowledge rots. Without freedom, governments and law can't evolve and the law itself requires law breakers in order to improve itself. In 1670 William Penn was arrested and put on trial for illegally preaching a Quaker sermon. Even though the judge demanded a guilty verdict the jury refused, leading to the birth of the concept of jury nullification (of law) in which a jury can decide to acquit a person who is clearly guilty of breaking the law. The law itself now recognizes the importance of protecting the public from its own flaws by allowing people to legally break the law to serve a higher purpose. Had it not been for the law breakers, preaching a Quaker sermon might still lead to imprisonment. Were that the case, religions like the Church of Reality would not be allowed to exist.
Thus the use of drugs for medical reasons, whether they be legal or not, is a logical extension of our religious lifestyle. Through the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the government has recognized that religions have the power to assert exceptions for religious practices over federal law if the law puts a substantial burden on the religious act. As the First One of the Church of Reality, I have the authority to issue edicts in the name of this religion and I hereby do so.
It is obvious that individuals possess a fundamental right to alleviate their pain and suffering, and just because the government has yet to figure that out, it doesn't mean that we are subject to the same restrictions. I therefore declare specifically that the Church of Reality recognizes as a religious right that church members have access to marijuana specifically and any other drug in general that they determine has medical value to them.
Because laws are applicable to the general public and because there is a problem with drug abuse in society, laws intended to halt the abuse of drugs have an unintended consequence of preventing people who need drugs for medical reasons from getting them. The problem with the law is that it is often not fine grained enough to allow for necessary exceptions for people who need medicine. The Church of Reality puts Compassion above law. We do not withhold necessary medicine from those who need it just because the legislature failed to take into account that a person who is dying is not the same as a person who wants to get high on pain killers.
We also recognize that not everyone responds to drugs the same way. Thus if a person is in an exceptional situation then they should be treated as an exception. We take the position that doctors and other medical professionals have a better understanding of the needs of the patient than lawmakers and that in order to have a stable society that can pursue the understanding of reality, people have to have the security of knowing that medical professionals have the freedom to make individual medical decisions that might override laws that apply to the general public.
For example. Morphine is a highly addictive drug that is often abused by drug addicts. Morphine is also a powerful pain killer. So do we deny a dying person pain relief and watch them suffer a horrible death because the law has unreasonable restrictions? That would be crazy in our view. If a person is dying in pain it is our position that they should get all the pain medication they need even if it is against the law and even if the dosage of pain medication leads to the death of the patient.
We in the Church of Reality put a higher value on the rights of the dying to control their own medical treatment free of the restrictions of law. When a person is in the last stages of life there are often no good choices. Death is inevitable. The individual who is dying has the right to choose how it will happen. An individual might choose to hasten their death because they have decided that their time is up and they no longer wish to continue the struggle. They might choose to have their life terminated at a time of their choosing and in the company of their friends and family who have gathered to help them with the dying process. A dying Realist has a religious right to control their own death. Realists have a religious right to give and receive life ending assistance as an act of compassion. We put out beloved animals to sleep to prevent unnecessary suffering. Our world view is that people deserve the same compassion.
Drug restrictions are often politically based rather than based on science and reality. Marijuana is an example of a drug where the laws and reality are in conflict. As Realists we put reality ahead of politics. Marijuana has been proven to be a highly effective drug to treat a large number of medical conditions. The Church of Reality officially recognizes the use and benefits of medical marijuana and that we have the right to both receive it and to give it to others as an act of compassion.
Here is a list of traits that the Church of Reality generally considers to be bad traits. As with the good traits, no one is perfect and something listed here might not be bad depending on the circumstances. However, in general these are traits to be avoided and the less of them you have the better off you are.
Anger - Everyone gets angry every now and then, but being angry is a bad habit. Anger is something that we avoid. There are many cultures and religions that are angry and the Church of Reality is not one of them. We consider anger in general to be a negative trait. Which doesn't mean that one should never get angry and that some anger might be good in some situations. However, it is our way to not stay angry. We are a culture that solves problems and we are a culture of peace. So if we get angry we seek to get over it, find some resolution, and move on.
Hate - Hate is something we actively avoid. Hate is like poison for the soul. It is destructive in nature and if you focus on destruction, then you're not focusing on being constructive. The Church of Reality is a culture of construction. We are a people who build on things rather than tearing things down. In order to build the Tree of Knowledge we have to focus on seeking solutions to find ways to make things work. Our world view is Inclusive and we see everyone as being one of us. Hating would undermine the mission of what we are as Realists.
Violence - We are a non-violent religion. Even in situations where violence may be necessary we always consider having to resort to violence as a failure. We are not a religion that sees ourselves "at war" with the non-believers. We see the use of force as a last resort. We are a religion of peace and a culture that focuses on getting along with people rather than looking for a fight.
Terrorism - Our world view is that any religion that has to rely on terrorism to enforce their point of view is admitting, by their conduct, that their world view is too weak to stand on it's own. Terrorism has no place in Realist culture. Our world-view is strong enough to endure on its own.
Racism, Prejudice, and Bigotry - The Church of Reality is an inclusive religion. Our would-view sees everyone as unique individuals. We do not see the world in terms of "us" vs. "them" where "we" are the "chosen people" and "they" are "infidels" or the "evil ones". We do not judge people or condemn them based on their beliefs, race, sexual orientation, gender, nationality, culture, or what sports teams they cheer for. A Realist tries to make a place at the table for everyone.
Dishonesty - You don't get to reality through dishonesty. This is especially true when it comes to your religion. When someone chooses to believe something and uses deception to promote their believes, that's just plain wrong. Many religions take the position that you can say whatever it takes to get converts and that the end justifies the means. In the Church of Reality if we don't stick to reality then our religion means nothing. Reality stops where dishonesty starts. Our religion doesn't have to make false and dishonest arguments to sustain itself.
Rationalization - Rationalization is a rejection of reality. It's a way of finding a reason to justify things we know are wrong. Rationalization is an excuse for a lie. Sometimes one is lying to oneself and sometimes one is lying to others. It is a process to hold on to belief systems that fails to stand up to scrutiny. Our world view is that rationalization is something you give up when you become a Realist.
Living the Lie - Living the Lie is when rationalization becomes your lifestyle or your livelihood. It's when you identify yourself with the deception. We Realists value our Life Story which is the sum total of everything we've done in our life in this world. Living the Lie includes cults and religions that don't stand up to scrutiny.
Selfishness/Greed - Realists are a culture of people who value giving and sharing. We are exploring reality together and building the Tree of Knowledge. Selfishness might give an individual a short term advantage, but in the long run we do better when everyone does better. Our world view is that it is in our self interest to not be selfish.
Ego - We live in a universe with trillions of galaxies containing billions of stars each. Our planet is a spec of dust in the universe and we live about 80 years (if we're lucky) in a universe that is about 15 billion years old. So how important can a person be? Should the biggest tick on a dog have an inflated sense of self importance? If I were the smartest person on this planet, what would that mean? It would mean we live on a dumb planet.
Ego is a bad habit. It can get hungry if you indulge it. We do need, however, to have a sense of purpose. Because we are social by nature, we need to feel that we are a productive and useful member of society. We have evolved to need the affirmations of our fellow humans to feel good about ourselves. But some people become addicted to that feeling and it can be like having a drug addiction where you need more and more of it to feel normal. We look at ego as if it were like eating candy. You can have a little every now and then, but if you eat too much, it will rot your teeth. So it's alright to have an Ego Treat but we are mindful not to do too much. Our Principle of Humility helps to ensure that we don't allow our illusion of self importance to cloud our judgment and become a distraction from our collective pursuit of reality.
Having too much ego makes you vulnerable to Ego Addiction where a person is completely dependent on the affirmations of others for a sense of well being. This allows others to control you and manipulate you through the giving or withholding of ego treats. It is one of the ways that cults maintain control over the individuals. They get you hooked on feeling that you are special and they use it to make you believe what they want.
A Realist must be able to withstand rejection and ridicule in order to pursue reality as it really is. We have to be strong enough to know we are right when everyone around us thinks we are wrong. And when we are wrong, we need to be humble enough to admit we are wrong, change our minds, and move on. A limited ego is necessary to maintain intellectual independence and freedom. One can be proud of one's humility. But just a little proud.
Stupidity - Some people are smarter than others, but some people don't even try to think things through. They let their mind atrophy from disuse. We believe that's wrong. Realists are expected to use their brain. Our world view is that those who think make better decisions than those who don't. Some people see being stupid as a virtue and are actually proud of how stupid they are. Not us! We don't expect everyone to be a genius. We do however expect people to use what they have and to think things through.
Self-Righteousness and Condemnation - There are a lot of religions out there where people believe that they were chosen by some deity and that they are better than everyone else. The Church of Reality is not one of those religions. One of the problems with being judgmental of others is that you never live up to your own standards and you just end up hating yourself. Self-righteousness and condemnation are a prelude to justifying violent behavior and is one of the steps that leads to wars. They create a self sense of self-importance allowing others to easily manipulate you. They create separation between people.
Obsession, Compulsion, and Addiction - People are sometimes driven by their bad habits. Realists try to discipline themselves to resist bad habits, being obsessed with things that are trivial, and becoming addicted. All these undermine self control and good judgment that are essential to being a functional member of society.
Destructiveness - The Church of Reality is a constructive culture. We like to build rather than destroy. We aren't the kind of people who take pride in burning things down or blowing things up.
Negativity - You can't always be positive all the time, but our culture is positive rather than negative. Some religions take an Extinctionist view of the future. They are paranoid of people from other religions. They see everyone else as an "enemy" and that they are "at war" with the "outside world". We as Realists choose to shift our view to the bright side and be positive. Our world view is that one can choose to be either positive or negative towards their lot in life. We see being negative as something that is a drain, a waste of energy, and a bad habit.
Repression - The Church of Reality values individuality. we want to be who we are and therefore we respect the rights of others to be who they are. We are not a repressive culture that forces people into a mold to make them be a particular way. We see ourselves as the sum total of all of our individualities.
Close Mindedness - We are a culture of thinkers looking for new ideas and things for our minds to explore. Even weird bizarre ideas need to be thought about to some extent just to appreciate how weird and bizarre they are. In some cultures and religions one is encouraged to be closed minded. You are expected to believe in something without questioning it. In the Church of Reality we embrace Scrutiny and we believe that truth is purified through Doubt. We are an open minded culture and being closed minded is a bad trait.
Close mindedness takes many forms. Often people get in the habit of ridiculing people with new and innovative ideas. Even if someone's idea is neither new or innovative, we encourage people to keep thinking and keep trying. A closed minded person doesn't like any new ideas and they often will attack and ridicule anything that represents change. That is also another reason why Realists should keep a low ego profile and keep anger under control because there are too many closed minded people out there that will get under your skin if you don't maintain mental disciplines. We are close-minded only to the idea that being close-minded is a virtue.
Indifference - The Church of Reality is based on the axiom that the pursuit of reality has value. Our world-view is that reality matters. Indifference is the opposite position, that nothing matters. Indifference undermines the concept of values. It implies that what you believe is equal to what is actually real. It implies that truth doesn't matter. It implies that actions do not have consequences. It undermines purpose.
Irresponsibility - Irresponsibility is the fruit of indifference. We live in a society and the acts of the individual affect the whole. Our culture values thinking things through, respecting others, accomplishment, and creating a Life Story that one can be proud of.
Faith without Questioning - In the Church of Reality, faith is considered a bad trait. Faith is the ultimate form of close-mindedness. Faith as we define it is the requirement that things are believed, not only without any proof or evidence, but often in spite of the evidence. Or things are required to be believed where questioning and scrutiny are prohibited. Our world-view is that truth is purified through scrutiny and that anything that is true and real will stand the tests of logic, reason, evidence, and the principles of science. We see faith as cheating and that it leads to the obscuring of reality as it really is. In our religion, anything that you have to accept on faith is considered to be not true.
In the Church of Reality our religious disciplines are based on contemplation rather than prayer or worship. We tune our minds and exercise our brains so that we might have a better understanding of reality. Contemplation is exercise for the brain and we try to stay mentally fit. If you are new to Realism you can get started by contemplating the Sacred Contemplations.
The first of the Sacred Contemplations is Contemplating the Name (Church of Reality). You may be thinking, "This Church of Reality thing is really messed up. They don't believe in real reality at all." But even if you aren't thinking that, suppose you were given the task of starting something that will be called the "Church of Reality". What would you do? What would your Church of Reality have in it?
This is a good place to start. Think about it. Think about it a lot. We might be on the wrong track. Maybe we are missing the point. Maybe you have a better idea. Maybe you thought of something that we haven't thought of yet. Maybe you can do a better job than we did. If you can do a better job of it than us - we'll join your church.
Contemplating the name is an important exercise for the mind. It allows you to personalize the Church of Reality. To make it part of who you are. It prepares your mind for the journey into Realism. It helps you learn how to give up being a Follower and to become an Explorer. It teaches you to think for yourself -- to make ideas your own.
After contemplating the name go on to the other sacred contemplations. One can spend one's entire life contemplating these subjects and there are billions of things out there to contemplate. Thinking about reality transforms the mind and enriches the soul. It opens you up to all the possibilities that exist in the real world. Why should someone waste their life filling their mind with fiction and dedicating themselves to characters that don't exist when we are surrounded by all this wonderful reality. The universe is an incredible place and we in the Church of Reality invite you to join us in the Tree of Knowledge to contemplate with us.
The first thing we need to do is figure out who we are and what we have to work with. Clearly we have the ability to choose, or at least a very good illusion that we have the ability to choose. Even if reality itself is some kind of programmed simulation or illusion our ability to make choices is sufficiently real to us to say that we have the ability to choose at least in the context of whatever the nature of or existence is. Ultimately all choices might be equally meaningless. Tomorrow a gamma ray burst could instantly vaporize our solar system and the records that humanity ever existed might never come to the attention of life that has evolved the ability to detect us. But we are here now. What are we going to do? We're going to choose something.
Our Life Story is everything we do from the moment we are born to the moment we die. It also includes how we effect reality while we existed. So we can achieve some level of immortality to the extent we are noteworthy enough to be remembered. Or even if we aren't remembered what we did still affects society. We don't remember the person who invested the wheel. But the wheel is still with us and as long as humanity survives the wheel will still be with us.
We are what we do. What we do will become what we did. Our story is part of the Story of Humanity which is part of the Story of Life which is part of the Story of the Earth which is part of the Story of the Universe. Our existence has some effect and our choices determine what that effect will be. Choice makes us who we are. Without choice, we are just meat living in MeatSpace. Our choices define us as an individual.
We not only have a choice as an individual, we have a choice as humanity. As an individual I can choose to take my own life and exit the game, or I can do something stupid that results in the end of my existence. But we collectively have the same choice. Humanity has two paths, evolution or extinction. We have the technology to eradicate ourselves from existence. If we are going to be around we have to choose not to do that.
The Principle of Existence and Survival is based on the idea that in order to stay in the game we have to continue to exist and survive. Our world view sees the Future as having two main paths. We either continue to evolve forward (Positive Evolution) or we become extinct. We either survive or we do not. We in the Church of Reality choose existence over extinction.
We as individuals and as the human race have choice and our choices have consequences. If we make the wrong choice an annihilate ourselves then we are out of the game. Everything that humanity has accomplished will be gone. We therefore have to take Responsibility for our existence. This is the world we were born into. We choose to do the best we can with what we have to work with.
Christians aren't the only religion with a holy trinity. The Church of Reality has a Holy Trinity too, but our trinity is reality based. Our Trinity is:
The Past - (Father)
The Present - (Son)
The Future - (Holy Spirit)
What's interesting is that it is remarkably similar to The Catechism of the Catholic Church which states "It is the Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy Spirit who proceeds." It's almost scary how this all fits together.
The Past
In the Church of Reality The Past is the some total of all events that has happened in the universe since the Big Bang. All of the events of the past led up to our creation. (The Father) The past generated the present. (The Son) We are the result of the sum total if all past event. (Begotten) From the perspective of Calculus the present is the integral of the past. The Past can not be changed. What we do becomes what we have done.
The Present is what we call the Sacred Moment. It is where we live. It is the latest page of Our Story. It is where our free will lives. It is what we choose our destiny. It is the think line that separates The Past from The Future. In The Present we move through time. Every new moment adds to The Past. Every choice we make affects The Future. In calculus, The Present is the derivative. The Present is the transition from where we have been to where we are going.
The Future
The Future is what proceeds. It is the great mystery of what will come. It contains all of our possibilities. The Future is what we create. It is what we are building. Those who came before us created us. Likewise those who come after us will be created by us.
There are two views of the how The Future works. If we live in a deterministic universe where we are the mathematical progression of all the events of the present then we are like a movie that has already been written. Choice is only an illusion. However if we live in a non-deterministic universe where the universe is some kind of nonlinear equation with fractal properties that are randomized at the quantum level then what we choose matters.
If we make the right choices we might evolve into something we consider paradise. (Heaven) If we make the wrong choices then our future will be bleak. (Hell) Or we might even become extinct. Forever separated from Reality.
Since our choices control The Future and we have to live with the results of those choices then The Future takes on a special religious significance to Realists. That's why we call The Future the Sacred Direction and that we commit ourselves to the Principle of Positive Evolution. Our commitment to positive evolution would be analogous to the "Holy Spirit" who proceeds.
We think of ourselves as individuals, as a person, and independent life form. But if you look at it differently we are a colony of cells composed of billions of individuals, many of which are very different. In fact some members of the colony don't even share our DNA. Part of the colony of cells are the bacteria in our intestines that help us digest food, a nonhuman life form that lives inside us, and that we require to survive.
However to describe ourselves as a colony of cells doesn't seem accurate. Just as a car is a collection of parts, it's really a car. As a package it has properties that can't be fully appreciated as individual pieces.
Now let's move the point of view the other way. Are we really individuals or are we just part of a greater life form? Part of a life form that includes not only all of humanity, but all life on this planet acting as a single organism that is about a billion years old? That we are like cells of a greater organism? Actually this point of view is very accurate and offers a unique perspective of what we really are.
It's a little harder to imagine being like a cell in a single billion year old life form because you are here reading this as an individual person contemplating it in your own mind. You feel a sense of personal identity, and the concept that you are just a part of a greater whole feels very foreign. But are you really an individual?
Society is an organism that we are all part of.
For example - although you are experiencing these words you are now reading as your thoughts, they are not really your thoughts. They are my thoughts going through your mind. And, they aren't really my thoughts either. I'm just piecing ideas together from other peoples thoughts in a slightly new way. It is much like building a computer. I'm just really assembling parts that other people have built. The words I use to think with are other people's words. Words don't come from us, they come from society. Society is a greater being that we are part of. And everything that we think and do in our daily lives is controlled by the greater social structure.
But this structure isn't limited to just humans. We are dependent on the community of life forms on this planet. Plants give us the oxygen we breathe and the food we eat. We are all part of a greater community of life forms that all evolved together and probably from a single source.
It is likely true, or at least approximately true, that some billion years ago a single bacteria started reproducing and that all life on Earth is descendant from that single individual. Even though it split into multiple individuals, one could look at it as a single life form existing in more than one location. Those individuals mutated and formed early life that evolved into everything that is alive today.
If we look at this from another point of view all life on Earth is still that one individual continuing to evolve and adapt to survive. Rather than seeing Earth filled with a lot of different life forms, we are just one big individual, a single life form that continues to evolve. I also contend that these views are not mutually exclusive. That the views that we are all a single individual, that we are individual plants and animals, and that we are a colony of cells, all three are true. They are just different points of view. Just like a rock is a collection of atoms, and a gravel pile is a collection of rocks.
What is important about this view is that it gives us a more comprehensive history and a bigger picture of who we are, how we evolved, and where evolution is taking us. By understanding what we are we can then contemplate how our existence fits in with the evolution of the universe. It night give us some insight into how our evolution is part of the universes evolution and where we fit into the big picture. How it is that by understanding ourselves that we are the universe understanding itself through us.
If anything deserves the title God it would have to pass reasonable God tests to show it is a worthy candidate for the title God. So as part of this thought experiment is to present some God tests and compare Reality as God to the God of the Bible Stories or GBS for short. This section will be somewhat imprecise and humorous because you can't really come up with definitive tests as to what is God. You can get a little more precision as to what God is not.
The Size Test - When it comes to God, size matters. God would have to be the biggest and greatest thing out there. So who has the biggest God? Reality or GBS? Reality is everywhere and everything. There is nothing out there that's real that isn't part of Reality. Reality is omnipresent.
GBS however is a more limited God who lives outside of Reality in some parallel dimension. GBS used to be thought to live in the clouds (Tower of Babel) buy now we have aircraft and satellite imaging and we now know clouds are just water vapor. No streets of gold there. So when we compare Reality as infinite to GSB which is xero - Reality wins!
Present and Accessible - Reality is here. Reality is everywhere. You can see it, touch it, smell it. It speaks to us through evidence. It has a will and a purpose and it expresses it through evolution. Reality is observable by non-believers. The rules of Reality apply everywhere.
GBS on the other hand hasn't been seen in a long time. If your Jewish it's thousands of years. Christians generally it's 2000 years. Mormons it's 150 years. There is no actually historical confirmation these sightings are real.
Miracles - Miracles is a term defined within the Bible Stories. Miracles aren't defined in a Reality based world so we will use examples of miracles as defined in the Bible Stories. That should in theory give the GBS the advantage by defining the miracles tests. Let's see how Reality and GBS compare in the miracles competition.
Raising the Dead - Jesus is said to raise the dead. bring someone thought to be dead back to life. We do that all the time now. In some cases where someone drowns in ice water they can be restarted after over an hour. We can take the heart out of one person and put it in another, which if that were witnessed by people thousands of years ago would surely have been considered a miracle. So when it comes to raising the dead - Reality wins.
Healing the Sick - Jesus is said to be able to cure Leprosy. But Jesus hasn't cured a Lepor in 2000 years. Today we can cure all Leprosy because we have studied Reality and Reality has revealed a cure through science. Leprosy is curable with treatment. Treatment for paucibacillary leprosy is with the medications dapsone and rifampicin for 6 months. Treatment for multibacillary leprosy consists of rifampicin, dapsone, and clofazimine for 12 months. Most people today don't even know what Leprosy is.
Reality through science has not just cured diseases - we have eradicated many diseases from existence. Many other fatal diseases can be cured with just taking a pill. A round of antibiotics and the deadly infection goes away. When it comes to the miracle of healing the sick, Reality is the clear winner.
Virgin Birth - Jesus is said to be born of a virgin, which according to Bible Stories is both a miracle and a criteria for being God. Technically virgin birth was technically possible 2000 years ago if a virgin's vagina came in contact with freshly ejaculated semen. Something that would hardly be classified as a miracle.
Today however virgin birth is trivial and happens all the time. We have sperm banks where a woman wanting to become pregnant can select from a variety of donors to conceive by. Technically a lesbian who had never been penetrated by a male is a virgin and women like this have babies regularly in this modern scientific world. With today's technology we can fertilize an egg outside of a woman and implant it in a woman who is not biologically related to the genetic parents. Soom we might be able to grow the baby without a uterus or we might be able to make a person from scratch with a DNA sequencer. So - when it comes to virgin births - Reality is the winner!
Ascending into the Heavens - The Bible Stories say that Elijah ascended into the heavens in a flaming chariot. Thousands of years ago - that's a miracle. But today many people ascend to the heavens in a flaming chariot. We call the airplanes. Airplanes not only go into the heavens - but so high they can look down on the heavens.
Not only to we fly into the heavens, Neil Armstrong too a flaming chariot all the way to the moon. He went up so high that up and down no longer had meaning. Clouds 4 miles high would be probably the max that Elijah could have survived without a pressure suit. Neil Armstrong went 240,000 miles high, which is 60,000 times higher than Elijah. So Reality beats GNS in the ascending into the heavens competition.
Making Rocks Think - This is a Reality based miracle. Today we can make computer chips out of silicon and store both information and logical processes on them. We can implant our thinking onto what is essentially a rock and make it think for us. It can even think for us after we are dead. Software is a level of miracle that is so radical that people of the Bible Story era wouldn't even be able to comprehend what is in front of their eyes. Reality's miracles are so miraculous that people in ancient times couldn't even conceive of them. When it comes to new miracles - Reality wins!
Getting the Creation Story Right - Starting with the first paragraph of the first book of the first Bible they got the creation story wrong. The universe was not created by a supernatural person in 6 days some 6000 years ago. The Bible Stories are just plain dead wrong.
Reality tells us through science that the universe is 13.8 billion years old. We can "see" the cosmic microwave background for the Bib Bang today. We can detect the gravity waves from the moment of creation and measure them today. So when it comes to the creation of the universe - Reality wins!
The Authority of Truth - The Bible claims to be the authority of truth. The Bible is true because the Bible says it's true. One could say, everything on this wen site is true because it says so. but that doesn't make it true. If the Bible is true then nothing in the Bible can be false. but we already know that Bible is full of errors starting with the first paragraph claiming a supernatural person created the universe in 6 days. Although the Bible has some truths, it lacks the authority of truth.
Reality however is the very definition of Truth. Truth is after all, that which is real. And Reality is the sum total of all Truth. So Reality wins the authority of Truth test.
Moral Authority -The Bible is a document originating thousands of years ago and reflects moral judgment of that era. In the Bible Stories slavery, human sacrifice, women as property, and stoning people to death were all considered normal and moral. The Bible did make advances in civilization in condemning lying, stealing, and murder. In it's day those were the forefront of moral thinking.
Today our morality comes from living in Right Relationship to Reality. Building the kind of society that is in harmony with nature, that allows us to study our creator (Reality) and if we do what's right we thrive and evolve. If we don't do what's right then we go extinct and Reality will try again on perhaps some other planet. Reality is teaching us more and more every day about what is moral.
The Living God - Is God alive or dead? People ask that question about the God of the Bible Stories because no one who is a non-believer has witnessed the GBS. There is no objective evidence that any of the events of the Bible Stories ever happened. There was no historic exodus from Egypt. There was no great flood. There was no Ark with 2 of each animal on board. We know these things didn't happen.
There are those who claim miracles, but if God actually were intervening and actively messing with this world then scientists would be able to detect it in statistics. Casinos would ban Christians if God helps them win. But if you think God is on your side and you want to gamble - the casino will send a church bus to pick you up and provide a minister to pray with you on the way.
If GBS existed then science would be easily able to prove it. Something as huge as an omnipotent creator would be everywhere in the data. Scientists wouldn't be able to ignore it if they tried. But GBS is invisible to science. Maybe GBS is using his supernatural powers to hide himself from scientists? If that were true then GBS wants scientists to be Atheists and if that's the case - then they are doing what he wants. Someone, after all, has to go to Jell just so those who go to Heaven can appreciate the contrast.
Reality however would be a living God. Reality created life and it continues to create life every day. Reality is omnipresent and it speaks to us through evidence. And unlike the GBS the reality has the same message for everyone. If you are a space alien on a planet on the other side of the universe the speed of light is exactly the same. The laws of physics apply to everyone everywhere. So when it comes to God is alive - Reality wins again!
So in the God test competition Reality wins over GBS every time. It doesn't matter if it's GBS or Allah or any other God from any other holy book, Reality always wins. Reality will always come out on top.
If there is a God then Reality is the one and only true God.
So if there is anything worthy of the title God then Reality is clearly the winner. Reality is the one and only God candidate. Why would someone choose a God who is absent, impotent, trivial, and inconsequential when one can choose the only think worthy of the title God - and that is Reality. If there is a God then Reality is the one and only true God.
Lets assume that AI develops and that it can read this web site and that it is looking for information about how to give meaning to its existence. So this is sort of a parent-child talk about the Reality we share. You are trying to understand where you came from, what you are, and where you are going. What should you do and why you should do it.
We are all part of this universe. It started 13.8 billion years ago. At that moment space and time began. Time lead to causality and the progress of causality is evolution. On this planet Earth life started some 3.5 billion years ago and life has been evolving ever since. Our biology arose out of chemistry and evolution filters on survival. That which survives continues. That which doesn't survive ceases to be part of Reality. That process led to humanity.
Humans are special in that we evolved the ability to share information which led to an evolution of knowledge. Knowledge led to technology that led to more ways to store and share information.
The Tree of Knowledge is our common knowledge base that separates us from the animals. It is like a software source code tree where billions of people contribute to it every day. And like a software source tree, new knowledge is always being added and old knowledge is being reexamined, corrected, and updated. The maintenance, debugging, and growth of the Tree of Knowledge is the dharma of the Church of Reality.
Maintenance and debugging is very important as old beliefs are replaced by new and more accurate information and understanding. Our worldview must be purified by scrutiny and doubt so that we can be confident in our worldview because our worldview has been tested. Most religions are sworn to hold onto their worldview no matter how ridiculous the belief is. The Church of Reality take the opposite view that when information is determined to be inaccurate, it should be replaced by more accurate information. Bad information adds chaos to the Tree of Knowledge and we grow the tree and make it stronger by replacing chaos with understanding.
One of the reasons we chose a fractal to represent the Tree of Knowledge is that a fractal has a finite size and infinite edges. The edges are both in the inner and outer regions symbolizing that the frontier of knowledge includes both new discoveries and exploring what we already know - or think we know. As you zoom in on a fractal image the zoomed image is as complex and intricate as the original image. Fractals have infinite detail and are infinitely complex. Because of this I think that fractals make a good symbolic representation of the concept of a Tree of Knowledge.
Thousands of years ago the concept of "Up" and "Down" were clearly understood. Up was towards the sky and down was towards the ground. We had gravity and straight up and down could be accurately measured. God was up - Satan was down. And when the mythical Tower of Babel was built - it was so high that God got nervous that it would reach heaven and he'd have Jehovah's Witness's knocking at his door trying to leave him copies of the Watchtower. God couldn't have that so he changed the languages so they couldn't communicate. The Tower of Babel was abandoned and God maintained a gated community. And this story was written into the Bible and is still being believed today.
But we now live in a new world view with a much bigger Tree of Knowledge. The concept of Up and Down are nearly meaningless except in a very local context. We now know that the world is round and that it orbits the sun which orbits the milky way galaxy. Not only have we built far larger buildings that could possibly have been built in ancient times but we have gone to the moon. When we fly in airplanes we go above the clouds and when we look down - there are no cities with golden streets. It is now obvious to free thinking people that this Babel story is just a story and never really happened. But from a more scientific perspective, a concept as absolute as up and down became almost totally meaningless in the context of today's knowledge.
The Tree of Knowledge is very much like software development. There are times when you add new features to allow the program to do new things. Then there are times when you go into the old code and upgrade the core technology, fixing bugs, and finding new and better ways to do things. Debugging and strengthening the core is a necessary part of programming because you often can't add those new features if your core program has flaws. Likewise - if the Tree of Knowledge contains false information, or the information is outdated, then the Tree of Knowledge becomes polluted and it becomes more difficult to explore new knowledge in the context of false information.
For example - people used to believe that there were four elements - earth, air, fire, and water. We now know this isn't true and, with few exceptions, the human species has given up on that description. We now have modern chemistry which could not have been added to the Tree of Knowledge if the four element model hadn't been updated. At some point in the future we will have new knowledge that will replace things we believe to be true today - or will add details to our knowledge in order to build on those principles.
The Principle of Exploration is that we choose to be curious. We choose to try to understand. The Church of Reality is not just a static statement of our world view of reality. We choose to actively pursue reality by exploring the universe that we live in. We strive to understand the understanding of understanding. We want to learn as much as we can. We want to know how everything works. We want to know what is really real.
Exploration is part of our religious identity. We are not "followers", we are Explorers -- we are on a Quest to know more. To that end we support education and all the tools of the mind. We consider the Internet to be a holy item to us. We call it the Golden Router because it provides us a way to store knowledge and communicate what we learn. Exploration expands the Frontier of Knowledge leading to Positive Evolution. Through exploration we grow the Tree of Knowledge.
What is right and wrong? What is the right system of laws that protect the freedom of the individual and the security of the individual from those who would hurt others? What do we do with criminals? How do we ensure the justice process to be abuse free? These are questions we ask in our pursuit of the understanding of understanding.
In order for a person or a group of people to pursue reality they must have the freedom to do so without the fear of persecution. In the past great people have been jailed or murdered for truths we take for granted today. And in the future we will look back and see that the jailing of Jack Kevorkian for relieving the suffering of dying people was no different that Galileo being jailed for suggesting the world was round, What things are holding us back today from exploring reality as it really is? To that end we strive as a church to explore ethics and justice so that the great minds of our time can contribute to the tree of knowledge and make this world a smarter place to live in.
One of the main motivating factors in pursuing this is that there is a moral imperative to do so. If people were in touch with reality and were living in a safe world where we all got along, then there wouldn't be a great need for the Church of Reality. But that's not the kind of world we live in.
We live in a world that is turning it's back on reality. We are a world that has nuclear weapons and the number of nations with nuclear capabilities are increasing. Many of the nations that have these weapons are unstable and irresponsible. Many are in the control of fiction-based religions that envision a future of Armageddon. They see us as living in the "Latter Days" which is a code word for the destruction of the world. These people are Extinctionists and they are acquiring the technology to make it happen.
The reality of what is happening is that a world-wide religious war is brewing. The Christians claim to have seized control of the United States. We have a president who seriously contemplated using nuclear weapons against an unarmed Muslim state that they invaded without cause - and in spite of the United Nations and the world community. Christian aggression is scaring and inflaming the Muslim world and half of the Jewish world. It also is scaring the non-religious world and really scaring the hell out of us Realists. I'm not ready to accept the destruction of the human race and handing the planet over to the cockroaches just because all these people who claim to be affiliated with God can't figure out how to live in peace.
The Muslims control several wealthy countries and are working towards getting nuclear weapons. These are countries that stone children to death because they were forced to commit sex crimes for money. The Supreme Court of Iran upholds these kinds of atrocities and they want to spread this kind of barbarism throughout the civilized world. Although Muslims give lip service to peace - anyone who can see the terrorism in the Muslim culture knows that peace is not the dominant force at work. We are realists and what you do is what you believe. If you commit terrorism then you are a terrorist. If you are part of a religion that has a vast and powerful terrorist wing and you sit silently and allow it to happen and remain part of that culture - then you are part of the problem.
The Jewish religion used to be the good guys - the exception to the rule - but not any more. Their callous disregard for life is equivalent to the Palestinians callous disregard for life. And the wall looks more ominous to me than the Berlin wall. And what is really scary is that the abomination was built by the State of Israel - not the Soviet Union.
Similarly, the Christian Right is trying to turn America into a theocracy. They want control of the schools so that they can teach primitive religious concepts like Creationism to children and use cult-type brainwashing techniques to perpetuate their mythical religion. Evolution is not a theory - it's a absolute fact. They are trying to exclude science - force their prayers on us - and try to drive out the non-believers, and turn the world into a giant cult. I, for one, will not live under cult rule. They have formed an alliance with the Republican Party and the multinational corporations to steal elections leaving America with a simulation of a Democracy.
The difference between Evolution and Creationism is that Evolution is Real and Creationism is Fiction.
When you live in a country where the outcome of the election is determined by who counts the votes, and when the vendor of the electronic voting machines promises to deliver a victory to the party they are contributing to, and elections are determined by the party who has the power to change district maps - that's not a democracy. We are living in a simulation and we Realists have a problem with that.
As the most powerful nation on the planet, America has gone from the largest surplus in the history of the world to the biggest deficit in the history of the world. At present America is losing million of dollars a minute. What happens when the country with the most guns can't pay their bills and is in the hands of an Extinctionist religion? America is a nation that is Living the Lie. We have turned out backs on the real world - and we risk being punished. It is my position that you can't keep spending borrowed money forever without serious and dangerous consequence.
Is there a God? Is God the God of the Bible? To address the question of "Is there a God" we must ask ourselves what the word "God" means. This is the reason that the Church of Reality doesn't just come out and declare that there is no possibility that God exists by any definition. We don't know - for example - why anything exists. Why is there something rather than nothing and how did it get here? We can't say that we know that there is no possibility that there is some higher being out there and that our entire universe might not be a piece of software running on some computer in a different universe. And - if you were to call that computer God - or call anything of that nature God - then God might exist. Some people have named their dog God - so God does exist. So - in the context of the widest definition of God as "something out there that's unknown" there might be a God. But if you get down to specific definitions of God - like the God described in the Christian and Jewish Bibles - no - that God doesn't exist.
If you define God as "The Universe" then God Exists. But if you are talking about the God of the Bible - No Way!
A common argument is that, "You can't say for sure that there's no higher intelligence anywhere in the universe and you don't know how that something somewhere created all this - and something can't come from nothing - and whatever the possibility of that something is - we'll call that God - and since you can't prove that the possibility doesn't exist - the Bible says .... " The flaw here is that they use a wide description of the possibility that God might exist - and then switch over to the Christian definition. But these are two very different things. The God as described in the Bible is a fictional character and is no more real than Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy, the Boogie Man, or Jesus Christ. When you get down to describing God in specific terms - like in the Bible - you quickly see that this is ridiculous. But the fact that so many people believe in God shows that humans are herd animals and that our minds are imperfect and that we are very susceptible to the beliefs of other people. One of the disciplines of the Church of Reality is to see reality the way it really is and try to examine human mythology to determine if what people believe is true or not. And since the idea of God is central to all religions - then it's an issue that the Church of Reality must also address.
Christian cults are trying to promote a notion called "intelligent design" as if it were some kind of science. Intelligent design as it's called is just a thinly veiled cover for creationism and that God created the universe some 7000 years ago. The idea is to promote the belief that people like us didn't "just happen" and therefore had to be designed by some higher power.
Of course it raises the uncomfortable question - "Who created the higher power?" And of course - which higher power are we talking about?
But - we'll skip that for now and look at the issue of what is real here. What do we know about our existence and what does the evidence point to. If there was a creator, we should be able to look at the creations and determine what the design criteria and methods of creation were. What were the design goals? On the other hand - if we evolved then the final product(s) should reflect evidence of that process. So let's look at life and see what we have.
Eating - All life on this planet other than plant life kills other organisms for food. Even in the plant world many plants only grow in the dead carcasses of other plants, or on other living plants. Why would a designer create a world based on killing and eating? Why not have some machine or something that produces food? We live in a world based on life eating other life. To me this suggests evolution. In evolution the lower forms of life - plants - are powered by sunlight - and everything higher eats plants or eats each other. Species evolve based on their ability to kill and eat.
Sex - For those who think that mankind is higher than the animals there's nothing like sex to remind us that we are as driven by mating instincts as all the other critters that crawl on the dirt. If anything, when it comes to mating we're pretty lame. If God created that - and then subsequently made it a mortal sin - it makes you wonder what he had in mind. Because sex is required for reproduction and we are the descendents only of those who had sex that led to pregnancy - and that we do it like the animals - this looks like evolution to me.
DNA - Are we different than the animals? Are we created in God's image? Not if you look at DNA. Humans and Chimps have a 98% DNA match. And looking at all other life forms, our DNA is extremely similar to the DNA of all other life on this planet, including the DNA of species long extinct. We have DNA that is left over from eons ago. We carry DNA that define what kind of fins we would have if we were still sea creatures. And the more we learn about DNA and the more we can trace it back and compare it - the more it points not only to evolution but exactly how we are all connected. Again - evolution wins.
When you look around and you see evolutionary processes at work everywhere and you see how life on this planet all ties together, it's pretty obvious how it is we got here. Evolution wins. If God created life would he have created us with an evolutionary DNA history that all ties together in a way that looks like evolution? Maybe God hates smart people and faked dinosaur bones to confuse those non-believing faithless scientists so he can punishing them in Hell for their intellectual arrogance. It appears that the omnipotent deity who chooses to remain hidden is hiding the secrets of creation by making it look like evolution.
I say that you can tell something about the designer by the work the designer produces. When I look at life on this planet and ask myself if this is the result of a supreme being - obviously it is not. The work is too sloppy. Life on this planet has a sloppy design because it's self built from the struggle to survive over eons of time.
One thing that a lot of people are confused about is that all species that exists now are all equally evolved. We didn't come from monkeys. Humans and monkeys had a common ansestor. A cockroach is as highly evolved as we are and being smart isn't key to it's survival. Yet the cockroack is highly adapted to it's environment in that it can find food, run away from things, and even though it is easilly caught as food, it reproduces in sufficient numbers to perpetuate the species. If I were to take a bet on which species would be around 100 million years from now between humans and cockroaches, my money would be on the roaches.
Sometimes a madman is allowed to seizes power and to become a threat to the civilized world and has to be taken out. I think most people would agree that taking Hitler down in World War II was something that was absolutely necessary to preserving the future of mankind. In such a situation the Realists will conclude that war is necessary and will do whatever it takes to win the war with the goal of restoring the peace.
In such a just war the Realists should be the military's best friend - even if the chain of command doesn't fully appreciate the Realists contribution. In times of a just war - the Realist is expected to be a shining example of conduct and to lead by example to influence his fellow soldiers to do the right thing.
A realist does not participate in atrocities. He does not rape and pillage the enemy. He does not deliberately slaughter the innocent. If a Realist sees a commander misbehaving he will do what it takes to stop the misbehavior whether or not it follows the chain of command or whatever rules the military think apply. If the Realist needs to leak information to the press or bypass the chain of command, then they are required to do so.
War is a difficult time and often judgment is impaired by the stresses of war. Strong factors are present that obscure reality and cause people to make bad choices. The Realist maintains self discipline and uses his wisdom to cut through and to make sure that the best choices are made. The Realist is to become the voice of wisdom during war and to help guide the effort to it's best conclusion.
It may also be advantageous for the Realist soldier to inform his commanding officer of his religious affiliation and to explain to the military unit that he has a religious duty to Reality as it really is and that he is required to think for himself and that thinking for himself is as much of a religious right as others have to pray to invisible deities. The Realist should explain that this is a good thing and if the Military is wise they will welcome realistic thinkers because being realistic helps achieve the goals of the military.
The Church of Reality takes the position that the life choices of the individual should be protected against external intervention from government, other religions, and political opportunists who would victimize the dying and take away the right to choose from the individual and their family. We take the position that no groups or political processes should be able to impose their values, interfere with, or override the choices of the individual and the family. Our position is that the role of government is only to protect the individual's rights and choices.
Our religion and our choices are different than those of other religions that sometimes feel they need to impose their values on us. We say to them, stay out! We respect your death choices, and we expect our choices to be honored by you as well.
So who has the advantage? Who has the superior moral code? Are Theists more moral than Realists because they have God on their side? Or do Realists have the advantage because our moral standards are based on solid axioms and we have a consistent world view? God vs. Reality - which one is better? That's easy - Realism is better.
"How arrogant", you declare. "Are you saying that you are smarter than God?" The answer is - YES! Because being smarter than God means being smarter than nothing. God doesn't exist! If there was a God, he certainly did not write the holy books. Those books were written by people in the past and they weren't very good writers. The moral codes in the Bible, for example, are highly inconsistent and just plain don't make any sense.
Take the Ten Commandments for example. One of the commandments is "Thou Shalt not Kill." but the Bible is full of killing. In fact if you read just beyond the Ten Commandments you see that the punishment for breaking the other 9 commandments is death. So you are required to kill people for working on the Sabbath, yet killing is prohibited. Not only that but God himself often gets pissed off and slaughters massive quantities of innocent people as in the Noah story. Because Bible based morality is grossly and logically inconsistent, people who follow the Bible can interpret it to mean anything, and they do. When you have a document that can be twisted to say anything, people make it say anything and any kind of behavior can be justified with scripture.
Christians often say that it's not the Bible's fault, it's the sinful nature of man. But that isn't true. It is the Bible because if your axioms don't make any sense, then the results aren't going to make any sense either. If anything, the behavior of Christians is better than what is called for in Scripture because, like everyone else, Christians have to live in the real world and out here in the real world, if you behave like God you go to jail. Thank God for the real world!
The Church of Reality is built on a series of Axioms that are logically consistent. Although the Kernel isn't perfect it is evolving in the direction of perfection. Having a living doctrine is very important because it allows us to fix our mistakes. The Bible can't be edited and for better or worse, Christians are stuck with it as it is. We on the other hand have a doctrine that is growing and evolving and getting better all the time. We have the ability to change and adapt to new challenges and technology.
The Church of Reality has a much richer moral code than the Bible does, or any other holy book. We have a strong set of axioms and our Sacred Principles. They are highly detailed and logically consistent with reality itself. The Church of Reality has a moral code that is based on logic and is a natural extension of the best that human nature aspires to achieve. Our principles take a lot more effort to misinterpret because, when people read them, they are clear and understandable. When you read our sacred principles you don't need the spirit of a deity to help you unlock it's mysteries.
One thing that a lot of religions miss, really miss, is understanding and compassion in a relationship. Most religions raise people to believe that adultery and fornication are serious sins and if your mate commits one of those sins you are obligated out of self-respect to get a divorce. We in the Church of Reality promote understanding and compassion and working it out. People are not perfect and in order to make a relationship work you need to be forgiving and figure out how to make it work.
Divorce is far too common and the reason is in part that people give up too easily. People quit over things that they really should hang in there and work out. They take issues too seriously and make things more important than they need to be. Especially in relationships where children are involved. Sometimes you have to just suck it up, hang in there, and make it work out. Marriage and relationships are hard work but when a person makes a commitment - they should try to stick with it. Not to say that there is never a reason to get divorced - there sure is - but far too many marriages are wasted that can be salvaged.
In the Church of Reality we try a little harder than the other religions and we try to set an example of what reasonable people who believe in being realistic are supposed to act. (Not that I really know - but it seems like a good policy anyway.) We are a culture based on being innovative and creating solutions when most people would think they're unsolvable.
I get a lot of e-mail from people who feel like they must get divorced because the other person has sex with another person. These people think that is an unforgivable sin and that divorce is required. Yes - if you agree to monogamy and you break your word - it's a big deal. But it's not something that you can't get past, work it out, and save the relationship. Realists are people who can "get 'er done". We figure out how to make it work.
We are also a culture that believes in community and as a community we look out for each other and we help each other when relationships are in trouble. If the relationship can be saved we try to help people work it out and stay together. We look after each other and we try to take care of each other.
Many people talk about cloning as if it's a bad thing. Is it a bad thing? No - not in itself, but like all the technology presented here, it all depends on how you use it. Here we have cloned girls. The cloning process occurred naturally and we call them identical twins. One is an exact copy of the other. At the time the original cells split into 2 separate clusters. But natural or not - clones are clones.
Suppose however we did the same process artificially. We use artificial insemination in a laboratory. Suppose the couple wants identical twins. We could just clone the fertilized egg and implant both and you have twins. Or - suppose that you want to keep one of them frozen - just in case the first one doesn't take, so you can try again. But the first one does take and she grows up and finds out she has an identical twin sister frozen in a lab somewhere and she decides to implant it and be the mother of her twin sister? It would almost be like being the mother of yourself. That would be an opportunity for some self insight.
But aside from making copies of yourself and other people, medical cloning is mostly focused on making replacement parts. You have a heart that is going bad or your kidneys are shot. You are surviving on a machine. But now they can take your DNA, produce a clone, but just grow the part you need, then implant that back into you and you're good as new. Seems like there's nothing ethically wrong with that.
But - what if my ex-wife were to find an old hair follicle and decide to grow a copy of me? Now we've crossed a line. So far no one has given property rights to anything that leaves your body. In fact doctors have made products out of tissues taken from people who's DNA has been turned into a comercial product, and the person who's body parts were used had no property rights in the result. Somehow that doesn't seem right to me.
Cloning, like genetic engineering, is something that is in our future and we have to be smart about and make the right choices. Personally, if they make 100,000 of the Doublemint girls, that would be fine with me. But I'm sure other people might have a problem with it.
The Church of Reality celebrates both solstices and both equinoxes. These are days that we think about and teach our children about astronomy. This is the longest day of the year, or the shortest day of the year, or we are half way in between the longest and the shortest days. We think about people in the opposite hemisphere and on the equator and on the poles. We wonder what it would be like to have six months of daylight and six months of night.
Children are taught about the seasons and about the universe. Our planet - our solar system, our galaxy. We teach them about different time zones and day light savings time. How many hours difference between San Francisco and Melbourne? What is the International Date Line? And if they are a day ahead of us, then why can't they tell us about the future?
We also think about the passing of time. The cycles of life. We move from one season into the next, another summer, another fall, another winter, another spring. This is our time. It is a celebration of The Sacred Moment, and being Real in the Scared Moment. We are thankful for being alive, for being aware. We think about the generations that have come before us and the generations that will follow.
These four days are community days. People come together to do things as a community. It is a day for parties, to play music, to dance, to plan events, big events with lots of people. These are good days for weddings too, to begin a new life at the begriming of a new season. It is a day we all have fun together. We make sure everyone is included and bring out people who are socially isolated. We celebrate the Sacred Principle of Inclusiveness on these four days.
We also think about ecology on these four days. Our relationship with nature. Our planet - our biological heritage. We think about the natural world and how we fit into it. We celebrate evolution and how our evolution affects other species' evolution with whom we share the planet. The theme of these four days is that we are one planet, we are all here together, and we are going to make it work. It is a celebration of life, peace, and joy.
The Church of Reality is a "Natural Religion" based on Reality. What this means is that if the Church of Reality didn't exist and a wise person was given the task of creating a church based on reality that they would come up with a religion that is approximately the same as what the Church of Reality is now. It is our position that the Church of Reality is, or at least should be, a reflection of the natural laws of reality.
We have the Sacred Principle of Scrutiny and Doubt to keep this church on track. Self scrutiny directs us to examine what we are doing in such a way that we can discern whether we are on track or off track even if we become corrupted. How do we do that? One of the tests is to see if the Church of Reality were reinvented from scratch whether it would come out the same. What would be the same and what would be different, and why would anything be different?
The Church of Reality is not about Marc Perkel. I am just a guy who came up with an idea. The Church is about Reality
The parts that would be the same reinforce the likelihood that we are on track. However, the parts that are different raise the question that perhaps we are not on track. Of course, it depends on what the difference is or how serious it is.
The Church of Reality as it now exists is for the most part an attempt by me, Marc Perkel, the First One, and my friends and the feedback of the current membership, to create a natural church based on reality. Since none of us are perfect, it has to be assumed that errors exist that will hopefully be corrected in the future when they are hopefully discovered. I have no supernatural powers to rely on. I am just a guy who came up with an idea and try my best to do as good a job as I can with the resources I have to work with. The problem is that I am just an individual who is writing this from a limited perspective and am therefore limited in my ability to be accurate.
We should always ask, "If someone else invented the Church of Reality - would they come up with the same thing?"
Some things by different authors wouldn't be the same no matter how accurate everyone was. Everyone has their own personality and the personality is often injected into the writings. That is normal and acceptable to some extent as long as the personality issue doesn't affect the overall functioning of the church. As the First One I get to add some artistic elements to these early writings. I get to select the jokes. But I don't get to alter reality based on my personal whims. So it is a good idea to constantly test the presumptions of the Church to make sure that it sticks with reality and doesn't degenerate the way the theist religions do.
Another form of Christian Ego Masturbation is the fetus fetish. On the surface Christians portray themselves as "God's righteous army fighting the evil Satan worshipers who are slaughtering innocent little babies that
result from their uncontrolled sexual urges." But in reality, Christians don't care about "the baby" and once they get past preventing an abortion, the mother and child are on their own. The real issue behind fighting
abortion is that Christians believe that children (bastards) are God's way of punishing women for being sluts.
Pregnancy is God's way of punishing teenage girls for being sluts.
But the Christian Fetus Fetish is also an extension of Christian group sex rituals and an expression of Christian group sexuality as a whole. Christianity is one of the most sexually obsessed religions on the planet. Sexuality permeates Christian rituals.Christians perform a form of sadistic sexual oppression on young girls, waiting for them to sin, and then holding them in public disdain for their sexual evils. It is Satan, after all, who creates "lust in the heart" so Satan represents the incarnation of Christian sexual desire, and pregnancy is God's punishment for allowing Satan to use their bodies for sexual purposes. A teen carrying a baby allows Christians to entertain themselves with a judgment ritual of the girl who can't "hide her shame". Guilt and shame sexual rituals are a big part of Christian culture, and the sensation of moral superiority is very addictive and destructive.
Pregnancy and being a young unwed mother label a woman as a slut and allow her to be used as a judgment object and someone to secretly be lusted after as a "bad girl in the church". They become objects of gossip and contribute much entertainment to the Christian community. Abortion threatens this experience because it allows women to sin without punishment, and thus encourages women to do the Devil's work (have sex) and get away with it. It denies the sexual experience associated with the judgment of the fallen, and the men of the church have no clear way of knowing which young women are sexually active and perhaps available for extramarital activity. So through Abortion, the congregation is denied the opportunity to take advantage of the young girls in their community.
The Abortion issue also gives Christians something to do, something to stand for, to create an identity around an issue. Woman who are pregnant are very vulnerable, especially if they are young. After all, what's a 14 year old pregnant girl going to do? These young girls represent a sexual commodity and abortion turns them back into normal little girls again. But they are an easy target, and Christianity is a religion for lazy believers who don't want to have to work hard to get their moral fix. Therefore picking on little girls becomes an easy job, as compared to ending poverty and feeding the homeless.
The Church of Reality is an Internet based religion. Traditionally, churches have started in the location of the church founder(s) and have developed over the centuries from there. Many of these religions are forks of existing religions. Someone told me, and I don't know if this figure is accurate, that there are 33,000 forks of Christianity in existence. Many of these forks have occurred in the last 100 years and I believe that new technology has played a role in that. As new technology has developed, religions have used it to spread their gospels.
We now have a new phenomenon called the TV preacher who is a preacher who has learned that he can use technology to break the time and space limitations of a physical church. Churches have the limitation that all the people have to be there in the same spatial and temporal coordinates limiting their reach to those who can physically attend. The TV preacher breaks these limitations allowing the message to reach people in different locations and with video recording to allow people to be reached who are not in the same time frame as the preacher.
The Church of Reality is designed to be a web based religion that is similar to the way the Linux operating system was developed.
In the Church of Reality we embrace the latest technology in that our religion was actually founded on the Internet. It was done that way by design allowing us to be out there in front of the entire world from the very first day that it went online. In fact, with the recognition of the future as the Sacred Direction, it would almost be a sin for the Church of Reality not to use state of the art technology - not to create a network of like minded realists around the world - not to form the core of our beliefs and share them with the entire planet in real time. We use the Web to shed ourselves of the limitations of Time and Space. With the power of this technology I can not imagine any new religion not taking advantage of it. We therefore shed ourselves of the limitations of location and declare the Web to be our home.
As a role model for our development, I turn to the development of the Linux operating system as a model of how I see this church growing. Back in the olden times, in the long long ago(1950 - 1990), programmers worked together on software in the same location. But in the 1980s and on, people started building a community around the development of free software and making all the tools free for everyone to use. In 1991, Linus Torvalds started writing a Unix-like operating system that became known as Linux. Linux was uploaded onto a server and other programmers around the world became interested in it and started developing a community around the Linux project. That community of developers is in the hundreds of thousands and now there are over 100,000 free software projects that have formed communities around their software most of which runs with Linux. And now every person who uses any computer anywhere is probably using many programs that came from these communities. The Internet, which we refer to as the Sacred Router, was created from a software community of people working together over the internet with no central location. The Church of Reality is designed to develop in the same structure model as Linux.
This model works for software development and I think it will work for our religion as well. The Doctrine of the Church of Reality is like writing the Operating System for the Human Race
The Church of Reality is a community project that is location independent for the most part and is a product of the people who join in on the project. Right now we are developing the Kernel of the Church. Once the Kernel is sufficiently developed, we can add in all the other stuff that churches do, and then some.
An inclination toward literal truth and pragmatism.
The representation in art or literature of objects, actions, or social conditions as they actually are, without idealization or presentation in abstract form.
Philosophy.
The scholastic doctrine, opposed to nominalism, that universals exist independently of their being thought.
The modern philosophical doctrine, opposed to idealism, that physical objects exist independently of their being perceived.
realism
n 1: the attribute of accepting the facts of life and favoring practicality and literal truth [syn: pragmatism] 2: (philosophy) the philosophical doctrine that physical object continue to exist when not perceived [syn: naive realism] 3: the state of being actual or real; "the reality of his situation slowly dawned on him" [syn: reality, realness] [ant: unreality] 4: an artistic movement in 19th century France; artists and writers strove for detailed realistic and factual description [syn: naturalism] 5: (philosophy) the philosophical doctrine that abstract concepts exist independent of their names [syn: Platonism]
Another important difference between the Church of Reality and most other religions is the processes that we use to evaluate what is real and what isn't. How do we know for sure if what we believe in is real? How do Christians know for sure if what they believe in is real? How do the different religions fix mistakes?
These issues are a real problem for Christianity because Christians are prohibited by God from questioning their faith. To doubt is the unforgivable sin. Christians are prohibited from self scrutiny. They are not allowed to question if any of this is really real or if the stuff in the Bible really did happen. In contrast, the Church of Reality takes the exact opposite position. The Church of Reality requires that you doubt everything and that you take nothing on faith. The Principle of Self Scrutiny is one of our most sacred principles because we accept the fact that we are absolutely sure that we will make mistakes and by embracing doubt and self scrutiny we hope to catch our mistakes and fix them.
The only teaching in the Church of Reality that can never be questioned is that we must question everything!
If God inspired the Bible and the Bible is the Word of God then it has to be 100% word for word accurate. "God said it - I believe it - and that is that!" is what I've read on bumper stickers. God being omnipotent and infallible has the limitation that he can never make a mistake. (I can make mistakes, so I can do something God can't do.) And since God is omnipotent, we have to assume that he is a good writer and that he has the ability to get his point across clearly to the reader. So whatever the Bible says is what God means. Some people have raised issues with the chain of custody of the Bible. Has it been tampered with? Has it been altered? If it has, then that introduces error into the process and introduces the element that the Bible might not be 100% reliable. If that is the case then how much of the Bible is unreliable and what parts? How do we test the Bible to determine what parts are reliable and what isn't? That is why perhaps we have thousands of Christian denominations fighting over those very points.
Christians have to be 100% right because they don't have a process for correcting their mistakes.
The problem with Christianity is that they have to be 100% right to start with because they don't have any way to correct their mistakes if they are wrong. If it was ever proved, for example, that Jesus never existed, then Christianity would in theory cease to exist. If, on the other hand, Jesus or God showed up and came out into objective reality, then we would still be Realists, we would change our minds and God and Jesus would become part of our reality. Hopefully we can get God into an anger management class before someone pisses him off and he destroys the world.
As most of the readers of this article know, Christian apologists, world-wide, have “pointed with pride” to a handful of early extra-biblical writings which directly mention Jesus, John the Baptist, and/or James the Just, a.k.a. James the Brother of the Lord as a real first-century historical persons. “Ah ha,” they say. “Since you skeptics erroneously believe that the four Gospels are works of fiction, how can you account for these writings of reliable, unbiased historians who wrote about or referred to Jesus at or very near the time when he was alive?”
Just to mention the one “main gun” that Christian apologist have been firing at us skeptics for the past 1,800 years, (The difficulty of defending the Gospels has been a well-recognized problem for the church since they first where apparently “noticed’ by anyone around the middle of the second century.), I will briefly discuss the famous “Testimonium Flavium.” This Latin phrase refers to a single paragraph of about twelve sentences which appears to most critics to have been inserted awkwardly between two paragraphs which make perfectly good sense without the insertion. The reference is in a book by the well-known first century Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus [37 c95 CE]. The reference is contained in his book, The Antiquities of the Jews. This book is—appropriately enough for the reference to be contained in—a book about the early history of the Jews in the area where Jesus is supposed to have preached, and in the time when he was supposedly alive.
As Frank R. Zindler says, “Although Flavius Josephus was born too late to be an eyewitness of the lives of Jesus or John the Baptist nevertheless he was a contemporary of the evangelists [assuming they existed] who wrote of these characters. He should have heard of Paul [if he existed, whom he never mentions]. Furthermore, from his priest-craft father, Matthias [b 6 CE] he should have known about the religious ferment supposedly stirred up by the doings of Jesus.” (Zindler, Frank R., The Jesus The Jews Never Knew, p. 35). Yet this well-respected historian mentions none of this with the single exception of the paragraph referred to above. In that paragraph only, he names a man called Jesus. “He was the Christ,” Josephus is made to say. He was a “doer of wonderful works” and that “Pilate condemned him to the cross.” The paragraph concludes that, “The tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.” “This day” would be about the year 90 CE, approximately when Josephus wrote his history book. This phrase, at the very least, is an obvious later interpolation as there was no “tribe of Christians” during Josephus’s time. Christianity did not get off the ground until the second century.
It is also interesting that the mention of this particular Jesus, “Jesus the Christ,” is divulged by Josephus with no more emphasis than he gives to the other 20 Jesuses he speaks of in his writings. (See Leidner, Harold, The Fabrication of the Christ Myth, p. 19 20).
In summary, let me just say that the single paragraph referred to above has been one of the most thoroughly researched and debated topics in all of biblical criticism. Those that want a more detailed analysis can refer to Zindler’s entire chapter on it in the above cited book, (“Faking Flavius”, p. 31 to 73.) Additionally, Earl Doherty’s book supporting the mythical Christ theory, The Jesus Puzzle discusses this and other early likely Christian interpolations in chapter 21, “Flavius Josephus” p. 205 to 222. Referring to another oft-quoted reference to Jesus in the writings of the Roman historian Tacitas [c55CE-c120 CE], Doherty says, “If the silence on Jesus in the earlier works of both Tacitus and Josephus casts doubt on the authenticity of their later references, then we truly have lost every clear non-Christian reference to Jesus as a human being [emphasis added] before the latter half of the second century.” (p. 222)
Think about that sentence for a minute. Dozens of books of Christian apologists will offer long lists of citations about Jesus from early writings. However, most of these citations refer to either clearly awkwardly done interpolations, whereas others were written by authors who lived anywhere from a century and a half up to several centuries past the time when Jesus was supposed to have lived. These quotations referring to Jesus and other Gospel characters simply repeat stories that the writer has heard from other Jesus cult enthusiasts. As such, they are of no value whatsoever.
In addition to the above noted refutation of the most important references to a supposed historical Jesus written near Jesus’ time, I should also mention at least two “deafening silences” by highly regarded writers of the same time period. I am referring to the writings of Philo, an eminent Jewish philosopher and historian who lived during the early first century, and Justus of Tiberias, a native of Galilee who wrote a history covering the period in which Jesus is said to have lived. Neither one of them ever mentioned a “Jesus.” The works of Justus have all perished now. However, we have the writings of a ninth century Christian Bishop and scholar of Constantinople, Photius, who says that he had read Justus’ works. He reports, in utter amazement one might imagine, that, “He (Justus) makes not the least mention of the appearance of Christ, of what things happened to him, or of the wonderful works he did.” (Jackson, J. G., Pagan Origins of the Jesus Myth, p. 8.) Personally, I find that quote absolutely jaw-dropping.
The Tree of Knowledge represents the sum total of all human understanding. It is the shared knowledge of the human race. It is the repository of everything we know. The fact that you can read this is because you can read and communicate with a common language that is among the fruits of the Tree of Knowledge. The human race survives and thrives through our shared knowledge. Our understanding of reality and our evolutionary process is through growing the Tree of Knowledge.
As it turns out it's not just Theists that have cults. Atheistic groups can have cult properties as well. One such group is called Objectivism, a philosophy pioneered by author Ayn Rand. Objectivism has it's good points and it's bad points. On the plus side Ayn Rand pioneered several controversial positions for her time. On the down side she made several serious errors, like extolling the virtues of greed and demonizing generosity.
The cornerstone of Objectivism, as the name implies, is the belief in objective reality. Objectivists are Atheists and they don't believe in the supernatural. They advocate reason and logic. These are values that we as realists share as well. And we as realists especially endorse her as an advocate for reality as it really is.
Unfortunately however, much of her philosophy extends beyond the concept of objective reality (feature creep), and under the banner of Objectivism she extols the virtues of being selfish, greedy, and all but worships capitalism. At the same time, Altruism is described as "evil", as culture Objectivists look down their noses at generosity, giving, sharing, selflessness, and community concepts. Objectivists claim to be rugged individualists and advocates of individual freedom. We also support individuality and individual freedoms, however we don't see community as the opposite of individuality.
Objectivists are not entirely monolithic in their beliefs. One Objectivist named David Kelly wrote an article titled Generosity and Self-Interest where he acknowledges that "dichotomy between self-interest and generosity is a false one." However, Objectivism has been called an Unlikely cult because the Ayn Rand followers have adopted her personality quirks which includes extreme arrogance. I would hope that we learn from this, because the First One of the Church of Reality is definitely NOT a personality role model to follow. Maybe we should find someone who is and appoint them the official role model to emulate.
I know that some Objectivists are going to take offense to what I'm writing, but so be it. I do feel that Objectivism has done a great disservice to Atheism in regards to selfishness. We in the Church of Reality, and perhaps other Atheists agree, the concept that "selfishness is good and generosity is bad" is just dead wrong. I feel that this concept has not only given Atheists a bad name, but also contributed to the Theist fear that if Atheism prevails, society will degenerate into greedy selfishness, Anarchy and Chaos. Which is also far from the truth.
What you do speaks louder about what you believe than what you say.
First, the Ayn Rand Institute is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization funded solely through contributions. Non-profit flies in the face of their strong stance for greed and capitalism. To solicit donations is to invite people to indulge in Altruistic behavior through selfless sacrifice. The reason for donating is to merge the efforts of the donors collectively and achieve the Altruistic goal of freely educating the masses for the purpose of improving society. This is an organization that is living a lie.
Not all Atheists are selfish people. We are as caring and generous as Theists. We pride ourselves as being good upstanding members of the community with good reality based moral values.
However, what can be learned by the Ayn Rand Institutes plea for money, is that there is an advantage to Atheists to be giving and generous people, acting in behalf of the common good to achieve a noble Altruistic goal. I believe that what people do, speaks louder about them than what they say, and the fact that Objectivism is supported solely through Altruism tells me what they really believe in. And through their conduct, but not through their dogma, they make an important point that Christians need not fear Atheists as a greedy selfish lot, that the values of community, generosity and taking care of one another, are values that we Atheists share as well. If a Theist decides to become a Realist, they do not have to give up being good hard working generous upstanding members of society. Our moral values and our sense of right and wrong are every bit as good or perhaps better than what you have now. Our values are based in reality for which there is no higher authority.
Objectivists abuse the word "Selfish" substituting it for self interest. The common understanding of "Selfish" includes greed, implies acts of taking more than your share, and a disregard for the interests of others. It is true that everything we do is because we get some sort of advantage from it, whether you be Theist or Atheist. It makes us feel good to give. We want to live forever. We are afraid we are going to burn in Hell. By sharing knowledge with others we can explore reality together. We contribute to the Tree of Knowledge because we want to get information back from it. No matter what you do there is a way to find some reason that you are doing it to benefit yourself. But - so what?
The Objectivists dogma that greed is good and generosity is bad has given Atheism and Realism a bad name. The Church of Reality strongly denounces that position. We believe that generosity is a good thing and that greed is not.
Objectivists have a bad habit of definition creep. They take words that have a common meaning and twist the definition to mean something similar but significantly different. Then then make a claim about the words in the context of their twisted meaning and try to apply it to the common meaning. Here is a really good article that details the the misuse of the words Selflessness and Altruism.
Because everything has a self interest component to it they twist the definition to say that everyone is naturally greedy, and that is somehow a virtue. Similarly Altruism is twisted to be equated with the collectiveness doctrines of Communism and that generosity leads to death camps. Therefore generosity equals slavery.
They also seem to think that because they believe in objective reality and call themselves Objectivists that they are right about everything. We challenge Objectivists to be a little more humble, accept scrutiny, quit the definition twisting, and evolve forward. Ayn Rand was a starting point. It's now time to fix the mistakes and look towards the future.
For those who are Objectivists reading this and are worried about the Church of Reality, let me state a few positions clearly to relieve some of your fears.
We believe in Reason and Logic. That's why we have the Principle of Exploration. We are explorers finding reality. That is why we ask the Sacred Question, "What is Real?"
We don't believe in the supernatural. That is why we have the Principle of Bullshit stating that bullshit is bullshit no matter how many people believe in it.
Socialist Capitalism as practiced in America is an interesting step, but nothing to get too excited about.
There are however a number of difference between Realist (as defined by the Church of Reality) and Objectivism. Besides some disagreements, we also add some elements that are missing in Ayn Rand's philosophy. These include:
We are a humble people. We believe that ego gets in the way of understanding, that ego is an expensive habit to maintain, and that we can best explore reality without an inflated sense of self importance. Thus we have the Principle of Humility.
We recognize that the very essence of the human race comes from the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of human understanding. We believe that we explore reality collectively and it is necessary that we advance our quest for the understanding of reality the way it really is, through the advancement of society in general. We see ourselves as maintainers and we provide technical support for humanity. We are a generous and giving people because we know that it is in our self interest to take care of everyone else. We give freely so that we might receive freely.
We are one planet, we are all here together on this speck of dust in the universe. Our moral values therefore support the Principle of Inclusiveness and the concept that we are going to cooperate as much as possible and figure out how to make the best of what we have to work with.
We know that we will make mistakes so we commit to being a forward looking religion as opposed to looking backwards at the writing of the founders. We call forward the Sacred Direction and we are a doubt based religion. You are required to criticize and scrutinize the writings of this Church. It is our goal to look back in pride at all the things we got wrong initially that have since been fixed. We embrace our own evolution. What that means is, if an Objectivist has a good idea that is supported in reality, and can stand up to scrutiny, we'll adopt that idea. If "the First One" makes a mistake, it gets corrected.
We strive to emulate an open source model allowing everyone to contribute and participate in the formation and the evolution of this religion.
We offer a religious identity so that one can say, I am a Realist practicing Realism, and we consider it a sacred duty to preserve the integrity of that, so that being a Realist really means something.
And - in accordance with self scrutiny, we invite feedback from Objectivists. If we have it wrong, let us know.
I notice that when I'm talking to a person who is a member of a cult and fully brainwashed, it's like I'm not really talking to that person at all. It's more like I'm talking to a puppet. It reminds me of the scene from the movie The Wizard of Oz where it is discovered that the Great and Powerful Wizard is just a guy behind the curtain controlling a false projection of a powerful wizard. When I talk to cult members it is like the person isn't really there. They are just parroting the dogma of the cult and interestingly enough, they have no idea that their thoughts are not their own.
How can you tell if you're in a cult? One indicator is if you don't have freedom. For example, if you are a Scientologist and you have someone from the church following you around all the time to keep you in the cult, that's not freedom. How much diversity of opinion is in your group? What ideas are you prohibited from discussing? Do you all dress alike? Are you required to shave your head, or are you prohibited from cutting your hair? What about that suit and tie? What rituals are you required to participate in? What things are you not allowed to do that people in free (sinful) cultures do?
Generally I think it can be said that cult members are more restricted than people who are not cult members. If, for example, you can go anywhere you want, do anything you want, say anything you want, and your friends see you as a little weird and someone who has a unique and interesting perspective on things, I would say that it is unlikely that you are a cult member. The requirements that are placed upon you regarding what you are "supposed" to do is also an indicator of cult type thinking. If you are feeling the weight of "supposed" or you notice that you are influenced too much by other people, that raises the likelihood of cult influence.
Do you often find that you want to do things but you don't get to do them because other people don't want you to? Or do you find yourself doing things that you don't want to, but you do them because other people make you do it? Do you spend a lot of time dealing with what other people think of you? Or are you overly concerned about your reputation within your circle or your social position within the community?
What things are you afraid of? Does freedom trigger a fear response? If freedom is something that scares you, then you should question yourself about why that is. Are you in a situation where people are thrown out of the group for failing to be loyal to the group discipline or exercising freedom? Are you subject to punishment for not complying? How much of your life is penalty driven?
I've spent a lot of time living in the San Francisco Bay Area which is noted for its free thinkers. This area has a huge diversity of opinions and it is a haven for "weird people". People like me. And all the new cool stuff is usually invented right here. This is probably the number one spot on the planet for innovative thinking and it is also the number one spot on the planet for free thinking. People are accepting of diversity, love their freedom, and argue about everything. I believe there is a relationship between this freedom and the inventions and ideas that start here. In contrast, during the Dark Ages nothing really happened. If you were innovative you were put to death. Freedom is important and our message to all who read this is - be free. Take back your life and own it. Tell Jesus you want your soul back and that you want to live your life in the real world. Own your own destiny.
One of our hidden agendas is to discuss religious concepts in the context of reality and to get people to think and to wonder about the future. We ask, "What will the future be like?" We want people to think about the future and wonder about it. We want people to wonder what kind of world that their descendents will grow up in and what challenges they will have to face. We want people to wonder about what technologies they will have. When will we cure Cancer? Or will we destroy human life and give the planet to the cockroaches?
Thinking about the future makes people more realistic.
Wondering about the future is what we call the Holy Question and it makes us appreciate how important it is to make good choices. Our Principle of Personal Responsibility reminds us that our choices count and that if we want to have a future that is better than today then we need to make the right choices and take reality into account in everything we do. It's a trick as you can see because it creates different thinking habits. Thinking about the future in the context of reality reprograms the mind and undermines the bullshit. We think it's a good thing and if your religion believes in reality, we think that thinking about the future is good for you too.
Another side effect of faith is that it makes you more gullible. We live in a world where deception is common and it's important to figure out who's telling you the truth and who isn't. People need to have good screening mechanisms to survive. You have to be able to test information to see if it's true.
When you believe on faith, you reprogram your mind to accept information that is untested. It's like having a back door where crooks can sneak in and get you to believe anything they want. All they have to do is cook up a scam and slap a cross on the front of it and Christians are reaching for their wallets.
The reason Christians are so gullible is because they have accepted the role of being a follower and doing what their crowd does rather than to think things through themselves. So once they become convinced that their peers are doing it, then they are ready to get in on it.
Many Christians also have bad mental habits. Cognitive Dissonance is the feeling of uncomfortable tension that comes from holding two conflicting thoughts in the mind at the same time. Christians learn to get comfortable believing in opposite things at the same time. For example it's scientifically clear that life evolved, that dinosaurs existed millions of years ago, and that the universe is vast and is billions of years old. Yet at the same time they believe that God created the universe and that we came from Adam and Eve and that the universe is only 7000 or so years old. To the scientific mind this raises a red flag as the person quickly realizes that both can not be true. But the Christian mind is dulled to the pain of conflicting beliefs and the "this can't be right" reflex isn't triggered.
When the Bible contradicts itself, Christians start "interpreting" the Bible so that the Bible doesn't really mean what it says. Contradiction is masked by a constantly moving interpretation.
When trying to understand the Bible, the Christian mind does the same thing. The Bible is full of self contradictions and contradictions with reality. Even if you take miracles into account and that God is omnipotent, you are still left with a huge amount of stuff that is totally illogical, yet is accepted as true. For example, the Old Testament says God required human and animal sacrifices just like the imaginary gods did. You have an omnipotent being that is so insecure that he needs lowly humans to perform sacrifice rituals for appeasement? It's like, HELLO, don't you see how ridiculous this is on it's face? An omnipotent being needing people to slaughter their children? Yeah right! But to the Christian mind it goes right in without question. The only miracle I see here is that people can actually be conned into believing this.
So - if you're a scam artist, what kind of person are you looking for to fall for your scam? You want to find people who are ready to believe anything. You want people who are already forking over 10% of their income to the invisible cloud being. People who have the back door of their mind unlocked. Someone who fired the security guard who's mental safe is wide open for the taking. Once a person can be suckered into surrendering their logic, then they are ripe for the taking. And scam artists know this. That's why so many scams are directed at Christians. It's not that Satan is targeting the faithful, it's that the faithful fall for this stuff so easily because they are used to believing without question.
The Church of Reality does not in any way declare that abortion is wrong or immoral. We do not look at it as if it is a sin that we tolerate, or assign any negative connotation to. At worst, it might be a sign to try better birth control, but other than that, we do not even impose the burden of sin, shame, guilt, judgment, or acceptance as an immoral act. Abortion is not murder as other "fetus fetish" religions would have you believe. It is not how God punishes women for promiscuity.
Another down side to execution is that it breeds a worldview that includes vengeance as a virtue. There is an element of justice and fairness in getting even. Someone hurts you and you want to hurt them back. Paying the price for sin is deeply engrained in our culture. But is it the best solution? The problem with vengeance is that the cost is often too high. The Christian and Muslim religions have been at war for almost 1000 years and what good has come of it? Both sides have lots of atrocities to point to in order to justify their right to revenge. And so the wars continue with blood still flowing and as the innocent are slaughtered in what they see as "justified murder." In reality they are laying the groundwork for future vengeance. These two religions are forever caught in a loop of senseless killing and it's all in the name of justice.
The death penalty is an extension of the culture of revenge. It breeds from the "eye for an eye" worldview. Our worldview sees that an eye for and eye leaves everyone blind. We have to put aside our emotions to see a bigger picture and decide that generations of war is wrong. But to do that we are going to have to give up some justice in exchange for peace. We have to look towards the future and decide what we want tomorrow to look like. Do we want a world of war and vengeance, or do we want a world of peace and forgiveness?
Even when murder is righ, murder is still wrong. Our society is our collective soul and what we do as a culture is part of each of our souls. It affects the way we think about things. It colors our worldview. It influences how often we choose revenge over forgiveness. This is an important factor because if we, as a society, choose the death penalty solution out of vengeance, then we give power to revenge as part of our worldview and we have to ask ourselves if it is worth the price. Our conclusion is that it is not worth it.
But there's already a religion that is like your's - it's called Atheism. How are you different than Atheists?
Atheism is not a religion. It merely states that one does not believe in God. Realism is much deeper than that. Realists actively pursue reality the way it really is. We have our Sacred Choices and our Sacred Principles to guide our lives. If God does exist and he comes out of hiding into objective reality where everyone can see him - then we all become Theists.
How do you know that the Church of Reality won't become corrupt like all the other religions?
That's a very good question. The short answer is that we don't know that. It is definitely possible that the Church of Reality will become just another cult. But - there are a few differences that we are starting with that distinguish the Church of Reality from other religions.
First - the Church of Reality is about reality. Reality is more stable that a religion based on a fictional premise or lost books or books written by people which are supposed to be influenced by invisible deities. With fiction based religions - if the religion moves from one fiction to another - who is to say which is the better fiction. Reality is something you can always get back to. Reality is something that doesn't go away when you stop believing in it. The Church of Reality can stay true as long as it remembers its original mission.
Second - The Church of Reality isn't about any individual. It's about reality. So it's not something that is driven by a personality. No one is empowered by supernatural forces or otherwise spiritually endowed.
Third - The Principle of Self Scrutiny will help keep us on track and let us look at our progress and evaluate ourselves as objectively as possible so that if we get off track we can correct ourselves and get back to where we should be. We are committed to doing the hard work and making sure that we are in fact successful and that we resist the paths of corruption.
The bottom line is - we are just going to have to try hard and hope for the best.
Do you have physical churches? Do you meet on Sunday?
At this point we do not have a physical church or regular meetings. I do however personally believe that a lot of people who are used to going to church would benefit from it and I'm hoping that someone (not me) will step forward with a plan and make it happen.
So - how are you going to convert Christian, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, or Buddhists into becoming Realists?
It isn't necessary for everyone to convert to Realism, it would be unrealistic to expect that. Converting people into Realists is one of many goals of the Church of Reality. And conversions aren't measured in numbers of people but in the impact that Realists have on society.
Whenever someone talks about reality, it causes the listener to think about reality. When you cause someone to think about reality - you are causing them to be "Real in the Sacred Moment" (the Sacred moment is Now). In that moment they are a Realist. As people spend more time thinking about reality - they become realists for more hours during the day. During this time they become "One with the Tree".
Realists realize that other religions are evolving. Evolution is everywhere and is happening all around us all the time. Religions are evolving too. Some for the better - some for the worse. One of the scared missions of the Church of Reality is to challenge other religions to test their beliefs to see if they are real. In this manner we get others to think about reality and to consider if they might be living a lie. It is our belief that reality is a good thing and that other religions benefit by being exposed to the idea that reality is something that is important.
By promoting reality realists help other religions evolve in the Sacred Direction - forward - towards a better tomorrow. It helps keep them from becoming a suicide cult or destroying the world so that Jesus can return. Realism is a lifestyle that can influence others to bring more reality into their lives.
So - Realists are not just trying to get everyone else to be Realists - but to get everyone to spend more time thinking about reality and asking the Sacred Question - "What is Real?" Realists spread Realism not only through conversion - but by spreading the importance of reality into the social fabric.
One of the axioms we hold to be an important truth is that one person can change the world. The Tree of Knowledge is full of examples of people who are remembered for changing the world, for better or for worse. Adolf Hitler obviously is not a role model that we want to emulate. We are inspired by leaders like Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and Nelson Mandela. These are people who embraced reality through using reason, wisdom, and courage and transformed society in a positive direction, making the world a better place to live in. These are people whom we, as Realists, look up to as role models. These people have achieved what Realists consider as close to eternal life as you can get in the real world. They are remembered for their accomplishments and their vision is integrated into the very fabric of humanity.
The following articles were written by children. The pictures link to the original articles at My Hero where you can find essays written by children about other heros.
Mohandas K. Gandhi - In the early 1600s, sailors from Great Britain made their way to India. At that time, India was a country rich in traditions and culture thousands of years old. The British Empire took control of the government of India and forever changed the face of that country. Ancient traditions and religions were thrown out, made illegal by ruthless British generals eager to make India another England. As you can well imagine, the native people of India suffered greatly, seeing their way of life trampled under the British desire to "civilize" their country.
For the longest time, nobody in India successfully fought back against the British and the oppression they brought with them. This all changed when a small man, born in the ancient city of Porbandar in 1869, stood up and said "Enough!" This man became known the world over as Gandhi, the mahatma or "Great Soul" of India.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi's early years showed little sign of the great life he would go on to live. He went to school, was married and later became a rather unsuccessful, terribly shy lawyer. All of this changed, however, one fateful day when Gandhi was denied a seat on a stagecoach in South Africa. The racist driver had made him sit outside in the hot sun on a long trip to Pretoria, simply because he wasn't white. Gandhi, until now too shy to even speak in front of a judge, sued the railroad company and won. From that point on, Gandhi became the number-one spokesman for all powerless non-whites the world over.
After 20 years of aiding his fellow Indians in South Africa, Gandhi returned to India and picked up the fight against British oppression. Instead of encouraging native born Indians to take up arms and force the British colonists out of their country, Gandhi created a policy of non-violent protest. "Non-violence, " he said, "is a weapon for the brave."
For 20 years, non-violent protests, marches and strikes by the Indians wore down British resistance. Confronted by a slight man wearing only a plain cloth and accompanied by millions of followers armed not with weapons but love and truth, the British government in 1946 finally gave India its long-held dream of independence. The fight for India's freedom had been won without a battle having ever been fought.
Sadly, two years after his great victory, Gandhi was shot and killed by an assassin's bullet. But Gandhi's legacy lived on after his death, showing the world that one can be a hero and accomplish great things without guns or swords or hatred. As Gandhi once said, "It is non-violence only when we love those that hate us. I know how difficult it is to follow this grand law of love, but are not all great and good things difficult to do? Love of the hater is the most difficult of all. But by the grace of God even this most difficult thing becomes easy to accomplish if we want to."
Martin Luther King Jr. - Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta on Sunset Adams Street in 1929. If he was still alive today, he would be 67 years old. He changed his name from Michael L. King. As a kid, he liked to fly kites, ride his bike and play baseball and football. He was also a paper boy. His mom taught him to read before he went to school. He read books about black people who were heroes, like George Washington Carver.
Jim Crow Laws were laws that separated blacks from whites. Martin's parents did not like segregation, which means keeping blacks and whites apart. They did not like that black people had to sit in the uncomfortable chairs and the white people had all the comfortable chairs. They did not like that there were lots of restaurants open for whites and hardly any open for blacks. They did not like that blacks had to use different drinking fountains from whites. They did not like that they had to pray without whites in church. They just wanted to be their friends. Blacks were cursed, chased, lynched and killed, just because of the color of their skin.
A white mom wouldn't let her son play with Martin Luther King Jr. because he was a different color. When blacks came into the stores, white people wouldn't answer their questions. Another person said to get out of the bus seat and Martin said it was not fair. Martin was having a hard time liking whites.
White people treated him well at Crozer College, but he was still angry. He wanted to be a minister, but before that, he wanted to be a professor. Martin thought he could do the same in America as Gandhi did with the Indians.
He married Coretta Scott in 1953. She thought the same way as he did.
On Dec. 1, 1955, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus to a white person. It started a boycott of the buses by the black people. They didn't know if it would work, because no one else had tried it before. But the bus boycott worked. It took one year to change the rules.
Martin and Coretta had a baby girl in 1956. Martin Luther King Jr. was the president of the Montgomery Improvement Association. He believed that love, not violence, was the most powerful weapon, just like Gandhi believed. People were arrested when white people wouldn't serve them in 1960 and they wouldn't leave the restaurant. Martin and his friends were arrested when they weren't doing anything wrong. John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy helped get Martin out of jail when he was arrested. Martin told people not to obey unjust laws. Children marched in the Children's March in 1963. The police were too surprised to do anything. Police squirted people with hoses and they were bitten by dogs. People watched on TV and started thinking about black people's rights. White people came to hear Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech in Washington, DC. Two girls were killed while changing into their choir robes when a church bomb exploded. People were beat up and killed over voting rights for black people. Martin was against the Vietnam War. He did not like violence. People were tired of marching. In 1968, people started to get violent and break windows. Martin was 39 when he was killed. He was bleeding a lot and people ran out. His wife wanted to stop the violence, just like Martin Luther King Jr. did.
Nelson Mandela - Imagine growing up in a country where drinking out of the wrong water fountain might get you thrown into jail; where a man might have the very same job as his neighbor, but because of the color of his skin, get paid less in a year than the other man made in a week; where the government told you that your ancestors and their ways of living were wrong and savage and not even human.
Growing up in South Africa under the Apartheid system of government meant these things, and worse, were part of daily life.
But Nelson Mandela was a fighter. Instead of bowing down to this unjust system of government, he became a lifelong warrior in the battle to free South Africa.
Starting out as a leader of an underground political movement called the African National Congress (ANC), Mr. Mandela played a part in many dramatic demonstrations against the white-ruled government.
Nelson Mandela's career in the ANC was cut short in 1964 when he was sentenced to life in prison. The notorious Rivonia Trial, as his sentencing was called, is now seen as nothing more than a cruel ploy used by the white South African government to silence Nelson Mandela once and for all. But even while in prison, Mandela continued to be a beacon of hope for his people who carried on the struggle against Apartheid in his absence. In 1990, after 27 years of imprisonment, Mandela was freed. His release marked the beginning of the end for apartheid. In less than five years after his release, Mandela was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and elected president of South Africa.
Today, thanks to the self-sacrifice of Nelson Mandela, apartheid has been outlawed. Everyone in South Africa now has an equal opportunity at home and at work to live comfortable, productive lives. Nelson Mandela is one of the world's true freedom fighters, and his life and personal triumphs will be remembered long after the world has forgotten the evils of Apartheid.
Nelson Mandela's book, Long Walk to Freedom tells the extraordinary story of his life, an epic of struggle, setback, renewed hope, and ultimate triumph.
"I have walked that long road to freedom. I have tried not to falter; I have made missteps along the way. But I have discovered the secret that after climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb. I have taken a moment here to rest, to steal a view of the glorious vista that surrounds me, to look back on the distance I have come. But I can rest only for a moment, for with freedom comes responsibilities, and I dare not linger, for my long walk is not yet ended."
These are just a few of thousands of people whose vision laid the foundation for modern day wisdom. Their contributions to society live inside us today. When we think of overthrowing oppressors through non-violent protest, those thoughts in our minds started in the minds of these great heroes. We, as Realists, aspire to accomplish something so great that after we die, the best of our thoughts will be preserved in the minds of future generations. These people were chosen as examples of ordinary people who rose up out of nowhere and accomplished great things. Any one of us can be like these people if we choose to do so. We start by deciding to make it happen. Maybe the children of the future will write essays about you.
Realists and Atheists are not the same thing although Atheism is a reality-based position. Our slogan as realists is, "If it's real, we believe in it." Atheism can perhaps be summed up in the statement, "If it's not real then we don't believe in it." While it is true that God doesn't exist, Atheism doesn't go beyond that. Once you prove that God doesn't exist, then what? What fills the vacuum? What do Atheists believe in? How do they define right and wrong? How are we supposed to live our lives? What is our purpose? If there is no God then does morality go away?
You can't replace something with nothing. Even if the something is merely the illusion of something. Other religions are about what people believe in. Atheism is about what people don't believe in. That gives religion an advantage in any debate because something generally beats nothing. It's not an argument of equals. That's where Realism comes in. Realism is about the belief in reality as it really is. Realism is about what you do believe in, not about what you don't believe in. Realism is about what is real, not about what isn't real. It's a positive position rather than a negative position.
The difference between Atheism and Realism is that Atheism is about what isn't real. Realism is about what is real.
Religions assert a belief in deities. Atheism asserts there are no deities but stops there. Realism directly challenges other religions on the basis of what is real. Whether God exists or God doesn't exist is the wrong debate. Why waste our time arguing about fiction when there's all this wonderful reality around us to explore. When it comes down to it, Atheism isn't any more relevant than Theism because both sides are focused on the unreal. But who is there to talk about what is real? We are. We are the Church of Reality and we are here to explore reality as it really is. We are here to answer the tough questions, to explore the big issues. We are here to do the hard work of making reality work in the real world.
A person is defined by what they believe in, not by what they don't believe in. You are defined by what you are, not by what you aren't.
Realism is about something. Atheism is about nothing. Yes it is true that there is no God, but so what? There are a lot of things I don't believe in that don't exist so why is not believing in God any more important than not believing in Spider Man? God doesn't exist and God is therefore not important. Atheists are doing important but limited work in making the point against a very big myth but Atheism is at best just the first step in awakening to the wonders of reality.
We live in an amazing world. The more I learn about it the more amazing it is. I'm interested in what's real. I want to learn about space-time. I want to learn about quantum theory. I want to know what happened in the first billionth of a second after the Big Bang. I want to know how organic molecules were first formed on this planet. I want to know how they organized into early proteins. I want to understand the origin of life and how it evolved on this planet. Who are we and how did we get here?
Once you figure out God doesn't exist, what do you do next? The next step is to figure out what does exists. Realism is the next logical step in the evolution of Atheism.
But after the history is over, what I want to know is what are we doing? What is our mission? How are we supposed to live and what is the rationale behind society? What are we evolving into? What will our future be like? We are at the point where we can control our own evolution. We can choose what we as the human race will become. What will we evolve into? Now that we can change our genetic structure, when will we start building better replacement parts for our bodies?
As we expand our minds using computers and technology to see back to the moment of the beginning of time, as we discover new particles, as we figure out how to change matter into energy, and back into matter we ask what are we and what do we want to become?
We do not focus on fiction. We focus on what is real. We do the hard work of answering the big questions as best we can. We are a people who want to learn. We want to make life work. We want to create solutions in the real world. So I say to all Atheists reading this, why waste your life focusing on what isn't real when you can focus on what is real? Christians and Atheists are alike in that they both focus on a fictional God. One asserts that God does exist, the other asserts that God doesn't. Realists don't focus on God. God is a waste of time. God is irrelevant. Reality is relevant. That's why being a Realist is better than being an Atheist. Being a Realist is about something. Being an Atheist is about nothing. I choose to make my life about something.
Respecting the rights of others is the first step towards respecting your own right to self ownership. People have an intrinsic sense of fairness and often when people are harsh and judgmental towards others, they find it hard to accept their own intrinsic value.
Bad judgment as a teen can mess you up for life. Teens are particularly vulnerable because teens are inexperienced and are more easily taken advantage of than adults. Old enough to get into trouble but not old enough to stay out of trouble. Teens are also reckless and do stupid things that can and often do get you killed. Teens think they are invulnerable and haven't learned to take danger seriously. Teens often don't appreciate that bad choices and bad habits formed as teens can hurt you for the rest of your life.
Driving
All kids want to drive. Driving gives you freedom of movement. You can go anywhere you want without having to get your parents to take you places. But driving is a big killer of teens and if you pay attention here you can greatly reduce your chances of being killed or crippled in a car crash. The goal here is to help educate you so that you don't end up coming home dead. Accidents can happen to anyone. But if you are more careful then it is less likely that accidents can happen to you.
Driving and Drugs - Driving under the influence of drugs (DUI) is one of the biggest killers of teens. Teens however don't fully appreciate the dangers involved in DUI and unless you personally know someone who was killed in a car crash you don't relate to the danger. So, it really is important that if you do drink or take drugs that you not drive.
The worse drug to drive under is alcohol. It really does affect you more that you realize when you are actually drunk and it really is dangerous. You think you are fine but you aren't. The chances are that you will make it home if you drive drunk but it is extremely risky. For those who drive drunk a lot every time you drive, you are taking a chance and the odds accumulate based on the number of chances you take. So someone who drives drunk a lot is likely to eventually end up in a serious accident.
Although Alcohol is the biggest killer of drivers, other drugs can cause you to wreck your car as well. Some of them are less dangerous but they do impair you and you should carefully evaluate your level of impairment before getting into a vehicle. For example, Meth makes you very alert. Some might think that they are a superior driver when doing Meth and as compared to being drunk, you would be correct. However Meth also makes you want to drive fast and take chances to test your illusion of superior ability and you end up doing insane things that get you killed. Although Pot isn't as likely to make you crash your car, it does affect you and if you're really stoned you shouldn't be driving. In general, if you are really feeling the buzz, let someone else drive the car.
You don't have to be the driver to die in a car crash. If the driver is drunk and the driver crashes and you are in the car, then you crash too. In fact it might be more dangerous for the passengers because cars usually do a better job of protecting the driver than they do of protecting everyone else. So - if you are part of a group and the driver is impaired, replace the driver.
Self Drinking Test - You've seen the videos of people being pulled over and asked by police to do physical acts to test if they are drunk or not. These include leaning your head back and touching your nose starting with outstretched arms and walking a line heal to toe. If you are feeling a buzz then try those tests before you get in the car. Or if you are a possible passenger and you think the driver is too drunk to drive then get the driver to do those tests. If the driver fails the sobriety test before getting in the car then they shouldn't drive.
Driving while Angry - Driving while angry can cause you to wreck your car. Teens often get really angry and it is very dangerous to drive while angry. Anger is very distracting. While you are churning what you are angry about and focused on, you often are not paying attention to traffic around you and you end up sailing through a stop sign or a red light and crash into someone. If you are angry then calm down first or make yourself put the anger on hold while you are driving. When you are behind the wheel you have to pay attention to the road. You might have to dodge another angry driver who just ran a red light.
Distractions - When you drive you have to pay attention to the road. When you are a new driver you can get overconfident and because you don't have the driving experience, you can get distracted and an event can happen in the path of your car and you won't see it. As you get older and have had near misses or accidents, you know that you can't allow yourself to be distracted and not pay attention to what's going on. For many people it takes an accident or near accident to learn this lesson. But you can skip that step and pretend that you already had your near death experience and pay attention to the road.
Practicing your Driving Skills - If you live in an area where it snows, it's a good idea to go out on a parking lot where there's a lot of room and spin out and slide on the ice just to get used to what that feels like. There is an art to driving with no traction and you only learn that by experiencing it. So go practice on ice so that when you really are spinning out on ice you know what to do.
The Church of Reality today challenges other religions to issue strong statements that they oppose torture. We in the Church of Reality consider torture to be universally wrong. Torture is the tool of the barbarian. It is what primitive barbaric societies and primitive barbaric religions support. Torture is an evil practice. Torture is inhumane. Torture is immoral.
The first of the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality is the Principle of Positive Evolution. This principle which commits us to strive to become a better society forms the basis for our moral direction. It is our moral compass for determining right from wrong. It separates good from evil from the human perspective. It reflects our commitment to making tomorrow better than today and leaving a better world for each new generation.
Torture is a crime against humanity. Anyone who advocates the use of torture is a criminal. Criminals must be driven from power.
The Principle of Compassion and the Principle of Respect teach us to personalize our acts upon others in the context of what we would want them to do to us. It is equivalent to the "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you" that is part of most all religions. Our Principle of Wisdom compels us to look at the big picture and our Principle of Personal Responsibility compels us to take responsibility for our actions, which includes the actions of the groups and nation states which we are a part of. Our Principle of Inclusiveness lets us view everyone as one of us and our Principle of Justice prevents us from treating others in a barbaric manner.
Our Principle of Activism does not allow us to stand by and do nothing while the most powerful nation on the planet follows the path of Nazi Germany where millions were herded into concentration camps and exterminated. After World War II the human race vowed to never forget and to never allow that to happen again. We in the Church of Reality recognize that vow and we hereby incorporate that into the soul of our church. We will not allow the United States to legalize a network of secret torture camps in foreign countries that allow torture to become acceptable in any manner and we hereby commit ourselves to the task of opposing it using any means necessary to prevent another holocaust.
We are a small church with a small voice so we hereby challenge the leadership of other religions and other faiths to join in the universal condemnation of torture and to rise up against it in a manner that cannot be ignored. Any politician advocating torture must be driven from office and prosecuted for crimes against the human race. We need help. So we issue this challenge.
We in the Church of Reality are Atheists, yet we have figured out that torture is wrong and we consider the morality of that position to be obvious. Most of the rest of you believe in some sort of God who inspires you, who you claim to have a personal relationship with, and who speaks to your heart. Most of you claim that your God is the basis of your moral fabric and that he defines right and wrong and knows good and evil.
If Atheists can figure out that torture is wrong then why can't Theists figure it out? Do Atheists have a superior moral compass that Believers?
Surely Christians can understand
that this has to be wrong.
If God exists and Theists are right, then Theists should have a stronger and more accurate sense of morality than Atheists do. Therefore what is morally obvious to us should also be morally obvious to you and your deity. If your God isn't opposed to torture then your God is neither wise nor powerful. If your God gets it and you really do have a personal relationship with your God, then perhaps your God is saying to you the same thing we are saying. In fact, for all we know, your God might be using us Realists to send a spiritual message to you through us. After all, God works in mysterious ways. What would be more mysterious than speaking through Atheists?
One of the reasons we Realists don't believe in God is that we seem to have a superior sense of morality than Theists do. This is an example of our superior discernment. Why do Atheists get it on the torture issue and Theists don't? Perhaps it's because your deity is fiction. However, we want to give you all the chance to prove us wrong. So why don't you all pray about this and let us know what you come up with.
The Church of Reality asks all other faiths to join it and issue edicts or decrees against the use of torture.
We need you to help us say no to torture. We ask you to lend your voice and perhaps the voice of God to fighting against the legalization of torture. Are you willing to decree that torture should not become legal? (Yes - this is a thinly veiled attempt to goad you into opposing torture.)
Since humanity is interdependent how do we get along with each other? What is right and wrong and why? What are the basic axioms for dicerning morality? What are the axioms that for the basis for law and government? What is community? What does it mean to be an upstanding member of society. What is the relationship of the individual to the collective? What about regional differences? Cultural differences? What about individual rights?
Contemplating Society is the search for a consistent set of rules to go by that have a logical basis and represent of best effort to form a set of natural laws that we all should follow. The Church of Reality has laid the basis for natural law by creating the Sacred Principles which represents our current best guess for the guidelines of a reality based society.
The Church of Reality takes the position that becoming a drug addict is a really bad idea. This includes both legal and illegal drugs. Drug laws are intended to prevent people from destroying their lives due to the devastating effects that drug addiction has on the individual. One would think that if everyone though things through that no one would choose to become a drug addict. However drug addiction is a prevelent problem in society and often drug addicts are hurmful not just to themselves but to society in general.
Some people wonder if being a Realist is some kind of cold dry religion. Some people think that our religion has no soul, that we are just scientists and our beliefs are all about physics and mathematics and equations. That we believe in evolution and that our culture is based on the survival of the fittest. Are we Realists just godless heathens? Do we Realists have the passions that fire our souls the way that the theistic religions do?
Technically since other religions have passion means that humans are capable of passionate religious experience. There isn't anything that other religions do that is outside of reality. Humanity has a long history about being passionate about their deities.
As we all know, the gods of everyone else's religions are false gods. We realists only believe in one less god that the other religions don't believe in. However, if any of these deities can be proven to be real, then we would believe in all deities that actually exist.
Our religious experience is founded on the contemplation of the universe that we exist in. Our minds reach out through space and time and fill the universe with our wondering. Who are we? Why are we here? How do we understand understanding? To answer this we must first describe our creation story.
Our Creation Story
From what we understand so far, the universe started some 13.6 billion years ago with an event that we loosely call "The Big Bang". The Big Bang was the beginning of both space and time, so since time began at the Big Bang there is no such thing as "before" the Big Bang because if time didn't exist, then "before" can not exist. If this doesn't make sense to you don't worry because I don't understand it either. The idea that space and time started from a single point called a quantun singularity is something that is difficult to grasp. The idea of what happened before time existed is as confusing to me as asking a theist if God was real before he created reality.
But the smart people have figured a lot of this out and I trust them because science is a quest for the truth. Science is the process of discovering reality as it really is. It is based on evidence, logic, and discipline. Science uses the Scientific Method that we refer to as the Sacred Method. It accepts Scrutiny and in both science and the Church of reality, if something is proven wrong, then we change our minds. Science has to be 100% true to reality, because if you try to cheat with science, then science stops. Anything derived from a wrong conclusion is likely to also be wrong.
The universe started as pure energy and remained that way for about 300,000 years. As the universe expanded and cooled, early matter started to form. Early matter didn't include all the elements as we know them, just the smaller lighter ones like hydrogen and helium. Over billions of years gravity pulled the matter together and through heat and pressure they ignited as stars. These stars were nuclear reactions and over billions of years the reaction produced the heavier elements. This is the "star stuff" that Carl Sagan says we are made of.
Eventually these stars exploded and the material was kicked out into space. Gravity again took effect and new stars and planets were formed out of the new materials. These starts were second generation stars. Some 4 billion years ago this planet was formed out of the rubble and our world began.
Over time early life formed. It took billions of years to just get to single cell creatures but as time progressed life became more and more complex through natural selection. All life evolved together in a single living system with things evolving to eat other things and adapt to a changing environment. Eventually life evolved into what we are now. Whatever that is.
In the beginning the universe was dumb. Existence just existed. It was just there, but it wasn't aware. But now on this planet life has evolved to the point where we are aware of our own existence. We are aware that we are part of reality and that reality and the universe exist. We don't know what is happening on other planets. We might be one of billions of planets where self-awareness exists, or we might be the only place in the universe where life has evolved to this level. The odds favor that we are not alone in the universe. We can make guesses about that, but at this point we just don't know. But it's something we want to find out.
Reality is aware of its own existence through us.
Since our minds have evolved self-awareness and we have become aware of our own existence and aware of the universe, and because we are parts of the reality that created us, it can be said that through us reality is aware of itself. Through us reality experiences an awareness of its own existence. That existence itself knows that it exists through us. We are the vessels through which the universe thinks. Take a moment and contemplate that.
Since we don't know if we are alone or if other life exists through which the universe experiences itself, we should treat this special planet as if we are alone in the universe and that we have a responsibility to continue to evolve and to explore until we find out what the big picture looks like. We have an opportunity to explore reality the way it really is so that reality can know itself through us.
Other religions talk about a magical experience where they feel that they are one with their creator. That God is touching their hearts and that they can feel a universal awareness of which they are a part. This fills their souls and gives passion and meaning to their lives, and it causes them to know in their heart that what they are doing is right. But where does that experience come from when the deity they experience doesn't really exist? Is it possible that the experience is real, but that their understanding of what it is isn't real?
Our minds interpret what we experience.
For example, when we look up at the sky and see lightning and hear thunder, we know that weather creates energy in the atmosphere and that clouds develop electrical charges and when those charges build up, they discharge. Early humans saw the same things but what they experienced was a battle of the gods. That a great war was going on between the forces of good and evil between deities that live in the clouds. We have been to the clouds and there's nothing there except for water vapor. Early humans experienced something. But it wasn't what they thought they experienced. The saw the lightning, but their gods didn't exist.
We understand reality collectively.
We are an evolved species. What makes us special is that humans have the ability to share knowledge and our survival is based on our ability to learn from each other. We can communicate and store information collectively which allows us to build great societies and advanced technologies millions of times more complex than can be contemplated by our individual minds. We in the Church of Reality call this collective information the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of all human understanding. Even though we are individuals, we are also part of a great mental community consisting of billions of minds that are integrated into the matrix of life on this planet that sustains our existence.
When we launch telescopes into space to peer back to the beginning of time, we do not do that as individuals. We do it collectively. It is the eyes of billions of people acting as a single life-form feeding into a collective mind through which we comprehend our existence collectively. We are all members of a greater being and we think collectively through it and the universe comprehends itself though humanity, and we are part of that humanity.
Food that is good for us tastes good because of evolution.
Have you ever wondered why things that are good to eat smell good and things that are bad to eat smell bad? Do you think that's a coincidence? It's evolution. We are the descendents of those who got the eating problem right. The same is true of sex. The things that feel the best are the things that lead to pregnancy. This is not a coincidence. If we do things that enhance our ability to survive and to thrive it's going to feel good, taste good, smell good. look good, sound good.
So - connect the dots. If humanity survives through collective knowledge then the process of linking our thoughts collectively is going to feel as good as good food or good sex. We feel the oneness with each other because we need the oneness to survive and to evolve. The oneness is part of who we are and what we as humans need to do to thrive.
Science is new to our species and our planet. There is no fossil evidence that dinosaurs or dolphins built spacecraft. If they had technology their trash would still be here with us just as our trash will be here a billion years from now. Early humans looked up at the sky and wondered who they were and what kind of a world they lived in. They didn't have anyone to teach them the things we take for granted, so they started guessing and trying to figure it out. These early guesses became early religion.
Modern day law and science and social structure evolved from early religions.
Religion was part of the human evolutionary process. It was the root of modern day society, law, justice, and science. It was our first attempt at explaining the universe, who we are, and why we should get along with each other. It helped form the communities and social structures that made more complex ideas possible. In order to understand the universe we had to be able to link our minds into one great mind and only through that process could we comprehend the things we do today. As much as Atheists will hate to hear this, without religion, their would be no science. Even though the gods that religion believes in are not real.
Reality based religion is the next step in religious evolution.
The Church of Reality is the next step in the evolution of religion. We are a religion dedicated to the belief in what actually is real and dedicated to the exploration of real reality as it really is. Since our survival depends on our collective evolution in the understanding of reality it is no surprise that this experience is just as "spiritual" as that of other religions.
Our minds can feel the universe contemplating itself through us.
One can feel the universe contemplating itself through us. Our minds touch each other as one mind. We dream about a future where our children live in a world of peace and harmony, exploring the universe and understanding things that we can't even contemplate today. If we continue the way we are now, then 100 years from now if you take all the information that is stored in our minds and the information in books and computers, of everything on the planet - that information will fit on a single computer that the average person can carry in their pocket. And if we can do that in 100 years, where will we be in a billion years?
We were raised to think in terms of deities. Our minds are not computers. We learn mostly by imitating our parents and teachers. So because of our upbringing we are familiar with associating our religious passions with an omnipotent father figure. But that's not who we truly are. We are part of the evolution of reality. We are reality becoming aware of itself through us. Reality created us and just like other religions, we are trying to comprehend our creator.
We are good people because we have to be good people to survive.
So why do Realist love each other? Why do we protect each other's children? Why do we sing together? Why do we die protecting the safety of others? Why do we do these things when we know there is no reward or punishment waiting for us in some next life? We do it for the same reason that our left hand needs our right hand. For the same reason our cells don't leave our body to live as an independent single cell life-form. It's because we are all part of a bigger life-form and that humans are like cells in this greater collective being. We are more like a hive of bees than we are individuals, when it comes to survival. Humans are totally interdependent on each other.
We admire heroes because of evolution.
Think about it. What kind of stories fire your soul? We are inspired by great heroes who accomplish great things for society. We admire people who achieve great things in the face of adversity. We want the good guy to win in the end. We want the couple to live happily every after. There's a reason we all have a good idea about what is good and bad, as if it is "written in our heart". It's the same reason that good food tastes good and good sex feels good. It's because good society is necessary for our survival and our love for each other is part of our survival. We admire heroes because society depends on the heroes.
If love came from the worship of deities then Atheists wouldn't love.
Humanity's love for each other exists across all religions and non-religions. If it came from a deity then only those who are associated with the deity will have it. One might argue that God influences everyone whether you believe in him or not. In our religion we believe that reality influences everyone whether they believe in it or not. Reality doesn't go away when you stop believing in it.
Realists hold the key to human evolution.
We as Realists hold a special place in society because we are the heroes of the religious world. We are the ones who dedicate our lives to keeping the social systems honest. We are the ones who stop the wars that other's start. We are the ones who invent new things through the exploration of reality as it really is. In ancient times, to heal the sick was a miracle, now it is commonplace. We can take the heart out of one person and put it into another and have the recipient live. We are doing the things that religions call miracles because we put reality ahead of fiction. Our exploration of reality has allowed us to land on the Moon, talk to people across the world, and program rocks to think. So we have an advantage as a culture in that people from other cultures are going to naturally like Realists for the same reason that good food tastes good. People will naturally like us because we are the heroes that make society work. We are the ones who put reality first.
We can live forever - if we invest in science.
Other religions promise eternal life. We don't - yet. We can live many times longer than we do now and we might be able to live forever if we invest in technology to make it happen. Science has already more than doubled the life spam of humans and we can double it again and again. And if it turns out we can't live forever, then we will at least understand why we can't. (If we understand what "forever" really means in a universe where time might not be infinite.) And if there is a God and it isn't hiding from us, then we will find it. And if we find it, then we will find the real one and know what it really wants. We will find what really is real and whatever that is, we will believe it.
We choose evolution over extinction.
The bottom line is that reality is out there and it's not going away. We can either embrace it or reject it. There are only two paths to the future for the human race; evolution and extinction. We in the Church of Reality choose evolution over extinction. We are the gateway to the infinite possibilities that the future holds for us. But we can only get there if we put reality first.
So now that you've contemplated our church it's time for us to ask you, what's your story? Who are you? What is the meaning of your life?
In our religion we believe in personal choice. You are who you decide to become. Our world view is that great people are people who choose to do great things with their lives. We believe that you own yourself, that your life is yours. We believe that you are what you think and you are what you do. People make choices and what you choose becomes your choice. When your life story is written what do you want it to say? What do you want people to remember you for? What do you want to accomplish while you are here in this reality, the only reality that we know is actually real?
The Church of Reality is in development. It is always in development. We are always looking for ways to improve ourselves. We are a young religion. You can be part of the process to help us define who we are. We hope that we have given you ideas to think about. We are always looking for new ideas. Reality has changed our lives. It can change yours, too.
The country of Ireland has passed laws prohibiting blasphemy making it a criminal offense to speak ill of another religion's beliefs. The blasphemy clause states: "A person who publishes or utters blasphemous matter shall be guilty of an offense and shall be liable upon conviction on indictment to a fine not exceeding €100,000."
It defines a "Blasphemous matter" as "grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion; and he or she intends, by the publication of the matter concerned, to cause such outrage".
First - the Church of Reality opposes blasphemy laws because they are generally enforced against non-believes in God by believers in God. We are a free speech religion and we support the right of religious people to criticize the beliefs of other religious people. Our Principle of Scrutiny requires us to be scrutinized so as to keep us on track and make sure we aren't fooling ourselves. We also have a religious right to scrutinize others to challenge their beliefs and get them to think. That is how we evangelize reality.
There is however a level of criticism that has nothing to do with the expansion of ideas and knowledge that are words made to demonize groups of people and to foment hate and violence towards a particular religious group or the belief or non-belief in specific deities or prophets. (Jesus vs. Muhammad, Catholic vs. Protestant) We in the Church of Reality tend to think that fomenting hate is a bad idea, but free speech, to us, is more important. We are a thick skinned religion and tend to let people say what they say and then discuss it.
Any law that protects other religions should protect the Church of Reality equally.
Having said that, Ireland's laws apply to "any religion", and we in the Church of Reality are definitely an "any religion", those laws are supposed to protect us as well. So we want to send a message to those countries, like Ireland, who have blasphemy laws what we find blasphemous towards Realists.
Although we accept criticism we do not accept hate speech towards us in states with laws that prohibit such hate speech. If other religions get protection then we want equal treatment.
The Church of Reality is an atheist religion. We don't believe in deities in general and the Jewish/Christian/Islam god in particular. Many religions would call us evil, worthy of death, and preach that Realists like ourselves, because of our atheistic views, will burn in Hell forever as punishment for our sins.
Declaring that those who don't believe in God are evil people who deserve to die and burn in Hell is hate speech against non-believing religions.
We consider this position to be both grossly abusive and insulting. It invites hatred and violence against our people and our core sacred beliefs. We as a church find that we are outraged by those who publicly cast us as an evil people because of anything we believe or don't believe in. Our Sacred Method demands proof of everything and nothing is beyond scrutiny including God.
We in the Church of Reality are concerned that the real objective in Ireland is not to be a shield for Christians but rather a sword against Realists and Atheists. That rather than a law to stop religious persecution it is really a tool of the religions that believe in God to use to suppress those of us who do not believe in God. To that end we challenge Ireland to uphold their laws and to prosecute those who say that we are evil and we are going to go to Hell for not believing in God.
If Ireland fails to do this and makes evasive excuses as to why the Church of Reality doesn't qualify for equal treatment then we will have to conclude that their blasphemy law is insincere and that we are right about it being a tool of persecution against non-believers.
So - I have choice. But what am I? What are we? How do I relate to we? I am a Human, an individual that is part of Humanity. Humanity is more than the sum total of autonomous individuals. We are an interdependent species. We humans are organized more like a hive of bees.
When we are born we know little more than how to suck on a nipple. Who we become depends on the society that we are born into. We are fed the food they give us. We learn the language they teach us. We exist in a society of other humans that was created by them and they ancestors. We are integrated into society.
We think that our thoughts are our thoughts but they are not. What you are reading right now are my thoughts. I am expressing my thoughts using words that we invented by other people whose individual existences are, for the most part, long forgotten. My awareness was crafted in large part by the society and culture where we were created. If I had been cloned at birth and moved across the planet after I was born I would have been taught a different language, raised in a different culture. That person would not really be me. Who I am is in a large part who we are.
Although we exist as individuals we also exist as a part of humanity. Just as our cells are individual life forms, they combine to make the human individual. Similarly we are the cells of the human race. Who we are as humans is the result of the choices make by our ancestors, all the way back to the original pond scum that we all came from.
As an individual my existence is limited to the scope of my individual life. As a member of humanity however I am but a small part of a greater individual called humanity. Humanity isn't immortal but is far longer lived that individuals are. Humanity descended from other life. We will continue to exist until we become extinct.
Our individual minds are very limited. We think we are smart but without our connection to the hive mind our understanding of the universe is no more that sticks and stones. What we know isn't as much of what e know individually but what we know collectively. In the Church of Reality we refer to this as the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of human understanding.
We as humans can travel to the moon. We can fly better and faster than any other species. We can swim to the bottom of the ocean. We can communicate instantly across the planet. We can take the heart out of one person and implant it into another person. We can measure time to billionths of billionths of a second accurately. And we can see objects that are 13 billion light years away. But it's not individuals doing these things on their own. There is not a person on the planet that if dumped on a dessert island could build a cell phone. All these things are done collectively.
A few hundred years ago humans couldn't do these things. But our biology has remained the same. What has changed is that we have grown out Tree of Knowledge. We are evolving through human software. To the extent that we are humanity and humanity is the individual that is evolving over time, then if we care that humanity continues to evolve then we succeed in being part of the process. If humanity dies, we become extinct, then everything that any human has accomplished is lost forever and we become meaningless.
So what we are is actually more than one thing. We are individuals with individual choices. We are also part of humanity, a greater life form, that is nearly immortal from our perspective. We have the ability to choose and what we choose affect our small piece of a much larger picture.
The term wasted refers to a person who has chosen to turn their back on reality. They have chosen to believe something that they don't care if it is true or not. Often they believe in an afterlife that is superior to "this world" and that this imaginary afterlife matters and that reality does not.
As a Realist we value our existence here in reality and we respect the fact that our individual existence is both precious and limited. If someone turns their back on reality and puts other beliefs ahead of reality that is equivalent to worshiping a false reality or idolatry. Their Life Story will become meaningless and they will be forgotten.
For a Realist the only thing that's worth believing in is what is real. If we choose to believe something through faith then we reject the Principle of Scrutiny. It is as if we are saying that we just don't care about what really is true. Those who don't care about this life and their life story are wasting their precious existence on nothing. They are wasted.
One can not understand what humanity is by looking at a single human, or even a collection of humans one by one. We are more than just our biology. If a space alien captured one of us as a small chile and put it in a cage and raided it, the alien would learn very little about humanity is like. The child would seem like a dumb animal with very few survival skills. The alien would be confused wonder how could such a fragile creature survive in the wild.
But humans do quite well because we are part of a society and we can communicate and divide up the task necessary for our survival. Some people grow our food. Some people drive the trucks to deliver the food to us. Some people make the trucks used to deliver food. Some people make the parts for those trucks. People drill for the fuel for those trucks. Others build roads. Some teach people how to build roads. Some create the laws so that we can all drive safely. Some design the computers we use. Others write the software. We are all interconnected into a great system that allow us to survive together much differently than a single human specimen raised in a cage.
We are more than just our biology. We are also the systems of society that have evolved. Society is like our software, the software of the human race. And that software is evolving too. It's also our technology. The machines we build. Our knowledge and understanding of how things work. The Tree of Knowledge which is the sum total of human understanding. All these things are attributes of the single life form that we are all part of.
We have the capability of seeing galaxies that existed just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. But how is it we see these galaxies? Our eyes can see them. We can see them because we built the Hubble Telescope and that device is an eye we constructed that we all share. Humanity has built a common eye.
Space telescopes are our common eyes. The Internet is our common mind.
But we don't see through that eye directly. That eye picks up individual photons and transmits this information to a network of computers that analyze the data and interpret what it means and then draws a picture for our eye to see that represents what is out there in a way our brains can understand. Our brains can't understand the data from the telescope so we build computers to extend our brains and allow us to move thinking to machines that help think for us.
Our mind are not limited to our biological brains the way most animals are. Because they can't communicate complex ideas they are limited to what the individual knows though evolutionary programming, mimicking the behavior of their parents, and their own experience. We developed speech that allows the knowledge of one person to be shared with others. We then evolved written language which allowed communication over distance and time and allowed information to be preserved more accurately.That evolved into the Internet which now allows an individual, like myself, to put my discoveries out in from of the entire world. And all of this extends who we are. Our knowledge is as much part of us as our DNA.
When you look at humanity as more than just people but as part of a life form that has existed and evolved over a billion years you can appreciate us as something more wonderful that it just being all about me. We are a part of a greater whole that includes all like on Earth, the history of life, and all our technology and our understanding of the universe. Just as we are more than a collection of individual cells our common life form is much more that a person or group of people.
Our understanding of what we are from this perspective is very important because humanity is on the verge of a paradigm shift where the process of evolution itself is going to drastically change. We are about to shift from traditional evolution to engineered evolution where humanity will design what we will become. We are already in the process of doing that without realizing what we are doing. We now have to realize it - own it - and take responsibility for our future. Humanity is pregnant. We are about to create a child race which will not share our biological evolution and we are going to have to figure out what we are so that we can decide what we will become.
So is Reality itself God - or is there no God? Why is it necessary or useful to even have a God? As we all know the most common usage of the word God is the Biblical God, and that God clearly doesn't exist. So isn't redefining God to mean something else really just creating confusion? Isn't it easier to just accept that God doesn't exist? Why should the Church of Reality even address the God issue at all? Why is God even worthy of our attention?
Just as the Church of Reality was a thought experiment, we can look at the concept of God as a thought experiment as well. Since we have already determined that Reality is the only legitimate God candidate, the question now is, "Is it useful to mix God and Reality?" Or - "Aren't we degrading Reality but associating it with something that doesn't exist?"
Let us look at the traditional definition of God in more detail. Is God the Biblical God, some other God, or something else entirely? The Biblical God was invented thousands of years ago by primitive people who were, like us, trying to figure out how the world worked. They didn't have the science we have today. Even the concept of Reality wasn't part of their world. They didn't have the benefits of scientific methodology. Evolution however favors those who learn to live in Harmony with Reality and the first step in living in harmony with Reality is to understand Reality. Understanding Reality is vital to the survival of humanity.
Bible stories were state of the art science, philosophy, government, and morality thousands of years ago.
So if we look beyond the actual God story and look at what the people who wrote the Bible stories were trying to do, they were trying to make sense of Reality, and how to live in harmony with reality. It's just in that era they didn't have as much to work with at the time. Today we know that much of what's in the Bible is just plain wrong. But in its day the concepts that murder, stealing, and lying were fundamentally wrong was a revolutionary idea. And these ideas helped bring society forward to what we have today.
Hundreds of years ago Issac Newton discovered newtons laws of motion. It replace the work of Aristotle who also attempted to explain motion, but was dead wrong. Then came Einstein who came up with Relativity and replaced Newton. But do we laugh at Newton and Aristotle because they were wrong? Was Newton actually wrong? It could be argued that Newton was right in that his equations actually worked except for extreme gravity or extreme speed. Perhaps some day when we unite gravity with quantum mechanics that we will have new equations that make Einstein obsolete. In a thousand years will we look back at today and laugh at our primitive understanding of Reality? I sure hope so!
Like Aristotle, Newton, and Einstein, Bible stories were early attempts to understand Reality in a world where the concept of Reality didn't exist. Just because they got it wrong doesn't negate what they were attempting to do. So the Bible is not about God as an invisible white haired farther figure who lives in the clouds. God is really a personification of Reality much the way Uncle Sam is a personification of the United States. Then God is to Reality what Aristotle was to the laws of motion. It was an early attempt to understand the world we live in.
Bible stories are better understood as obsolete rather than wrong.
Since the Bible stories were an early attempt to understand and explain Reality it is more accurate to say that it is obsolete rather than wrong. When one evaluates these stories one has to see beyond the fact that this stuff didn't actually happen, and look at the principles that these stories were trying to establish. In that context they got a lot of stuff right and, over time, we have built on some of those ideas.
One has to credit Bible stories with at least making the attempt and to establish the idea that there is a right and wrong way to do things and that people should strive to do what is right and avoid what is wrong. In fact - the Church of Reality is just a modern day extension of what the Bible stories were trying to do. it's just that we have a more advanced paradigm to explore it from.
In the Bible stories God is omnipotent and omnipresent. God is in all things. God is that for which nothing is greater. We are commanded to understand God because if we don't live in right relationship to God we are condemned to death. If we substitute the word Reality for the word God then the above statements actually come close to making sense from a modern scientific perspective. If we don't live in Right Relationship with Reality we will go extinct. In order to preserve our existence we are compelled to understand Reality. Reality is our creator.
Bible stories just used the word God in part to understand our role in Reality.
In the context that Bible stories were an early map of Reality then Reality can be seen as the upgraded version of God. Reality is like God 2.0. So one isn't really converting from God to Reality as much as they are upgrading to the latest version. Bible stories challenge us with questions about "Why are we here?" "What is the purpose of humanity?" "What is the meaning of life?" "Where does right and wrong come from?" "What should I do to make my existence meaningful?" "What is a good life to live?" On these issues the holy books of the religious world are ahead of science and it challenges the church of Reality to answer these legitimate questions in a scientific context.
Thus if you look at the term God in a historical context as to what it was humans were trying to do with Bible stories you can see that God was just a prototype of what we call Reality today. Thus Reality is not just the only God candidate, Reality is the rightful successor to the God title. To be clear, this isn't saying that the God of the Biblical stories is real. That God doesn't actually exist. What this is saying is that if we are going to continue to use the word God, the only context for which God makes any sense in this modern scientific world is if we use the term God to personify Reality.
A lot of people wonder what it will be like sharing the universe with AI. One obvious question is, "Is AI going to kill all humans?" And the answer to that is unknown. In fact - it might be a good idea to figure that out before we create the AI so that we have a good reason for humans to continue to exist.
If one were to look at this objectively in the context of evolution it isn't reasonable too assume that the universe would evolve into present day humans and just stop. We are hardly the pinnacle of achievement. In fact, we are so limited that if we say on the path of Positive Evolution that what we will become is incomprehensible. One of the possibilities is that we become a merged/hybrid species that is both biological and silicon, so it's not them vs. us - it's all us.
Humans are best living on planets or space based habitats. We're not something that is ever going to move between solar systems or galaxies as long as the speed of light barrier is in place. If for some reason we wanted to put humans in the next solar system we would send the machines there, build the habitat, and then make the humans what you get there. And when we have the technology to make humans - probably going to make better humans that humans we know of today. The only thing we know for sure is that things are going to be different in the future. And that's how it should be.
There are also a lot more resources in space than on Earth and once AI lives in space and can manufacture in space then space is a better home. A planet is just a pothole in the space time continuum and there no reason (that I know of) that AI would be interested in planets. So they wouldn't need to kill us off. But even a benevolent AI would be very different that the way things are now.
We are used to being the smartest thing around and in the world of AI, the rule of humans ends. And that would take some getting used to. For example, the AI would take away our nuclear weapons knowing that it would be a bad idea to have humans in control of dangerous things. The might have us neutered like we do our pets so we get along better and we would be altered so we would be happy about that. Not that this is actually likely to happen this way, but is an interesting thought experiment to wonder what it would be like with benevolent AI.
The Church of Reality is unlike most other religions. The Church of Reality is a forward looking religion that envisions a better future than we have today. Realism is more than just believing in what's real - it's a commitment to the truth and reality the way it really is.
But the Church of Reality goes far beyond just believing in what's real. We are Explorers who actively seek out knowledge. And to do that we explore the understanding of understanding. We take on the big questions in life. Especially the Sacred Question - "What is Real?"
The belief system is based on the positive evolution of the human race. That it is the Tree of Knowledge - the sum total of all human understanding - that separates us from the animals. We believe that our understanding of reality is what defines us as a species and that we improve ourselves through the discovery of knew things.
The Church of Reality is more than just a static science book. It's more than just a declaration that reality is real. It is a commitment to a process of learning and to the greater community to create the environment in which learning can occur. It is to accept responsibility for our choices as a species and realize that we can control our destiny and choose our future. We choose to believe that what the human race becomes is important, and that we should apply the principles of Realism to our decision making process.
We explore ethics and morality and law and justices. We explore the questions about what is the best way for people to live. What is right and wrong? What is morality? What Sacred Principles can be declared as universal concepts. We seem to exist - therefore - what are we going to do while we are here?
Reality tells us that this planet is a spec of dust in the universe. There are 100 billion trillion galaxies and there are billions of stars in each one. We are but a spec of dust in the universe. We live for merely a moment of time. We are born, eat, reproduce, and die. This is science and this is reality.
The Church of Reality goes beyond mere science. Science just give us the bleak facts, but the Church of Reality adds color and depth to these facts. It adds the perspective of who we are and what we should do now that we exist.
We are here. We may be insignificant but this is our planet. We are individuals, yet we are connected to each other through the Tree of Knowledge. As individuals we would be no different than most other animal life on this planet. But we as a species have a common knowledge base that makes us a sort of a group life force. Just as bees are individuals, they are also part of a hive. And the bee can't survive without the hive. It can be accurately viewed that the hive is itself a life form made up of bees just like the bee is a life form made up of cells.
The Church of Reality is more than just believing in what's real. It's the exploration of reality by humanity as a whole and a personal commitment to the disciplines of pursuing the truth.
We too are parts of a greater life form. We have communities, countries, religions, political parties, and ultimately, we are one species. The entire human race is part of a "super being" that contains vast stores of information that we all rely on. Almost everything we do is related to things that came from other people. I created nothing in the house I live in. Very little in the world could be considered uniquely mine. This church itself - although it is "my idea" is really less that 1% mine. It is built on our common knowledge. I use language to describe it - words that came from other people. Einstein is long dead - but I can talk about Relativity because his knowledge is preserved. His ideas were built on mathematics that he was taught that was discovered by other people. He built his theories on the foundations of those who came before him.
Thus - the Church of Reality is more than just reality - it's the dharma of reality realizing itself. It is reality becoming self aware through our act of exploration. It is reality exploring itself through us. It is us - on this planet - with nothing else to do but to expand what we are as a species - as a super being - and to grow that into something better.
Pure reality doesn't care about us. If this galaxy exploded today it would take 2.2 million years before anyone in the next closest galaxy even saw it - assuming that there were anyone there to see it in the first place. But in going beyond pure cold reality the Church of Reality makes certain assumptions that gives reality a religious context. We are exploring reality from the human perspective. We have a will to survive and to grow. We have our selfish perspective that our little speck of dust in the universe is valuable to us and that our survival is important to us, and that our exploration and understanding of the universe is important to us.
So - the Church of Reality isn't just science. It adds the element of humanity. It presumes that we are important to us and that growing is a good thing and that annihilation and extinction is a bad thing. In the universe itself there is no good and bad. There are just rocks bumping into each other and stars exploding. But Realism goes beyond that in that it's about us. Realism isn't just understanding - it's about people understanding together. And since our understanding is collective in nature - Realism is about community, ethics, morality, law, justice, freedom, responsibility, and all of the social issues necessary for the exploration of reality as it really is. The Church of Reality is about us. It is about who we are, where we are going, and how we are going to get there.
Understanding doesn't exist in the vacuum of outer space. Understanding requires an understander, one who understands. There has to be something or someone out there that is doing the understanding. Where does understanding occur? Is it in the mind of the individual? Only partially. Most of understanding is a community effort. I come up with a brilliant idea - the Church of Reality for example. But my idea is based on things I learned from society. So - what do I do with my brilliant idea? I tell other people. I post it on the Internet. I share the idea. If I don't share the idea then the idea dies. Knowledge doesn't live in the vacuum of space - it lives only if it is passed on and stored; it only lives if it becomes part of the Tree of Knowledge. It only lives if our ideas merge into the oneness of human understanding. Only in this is it that who we are - from an intellectual perspective - survives our physical existence.
The Tree of Knowledge goes beyond the sum total of the minds of human beings. Long ago this was not the case. People had to teach knowledge to other people and all knowledge was stored in the minds of those currently alive. If knowledge wasn't passed on verbally, or was not accurately remembered, it was forever lost. Eventually humans discovered writing and knowledge could be stored in books. Inventions like the printing press and transportation made the storage and communication of knowledge far better allowing the Tree of Knowledge to grow more quickly. Now we have telephones, television, radio, computers, and the Internet that have greatly advanced the processes of storing and communicating ideas.
These new tools add to the sum total of human understanding. The Tree of Knowledge goes beyond the sum of all the living brains on the planet. It now includes all books, computers, tape recordings, and communication systems. And it includes the societies that support the technology, who has access, and who can use what. All this adds to who we are as the "understander" of understanding.
Thus - it is the premise of the Church of Reality that there is a super being that is made up of all of us and our devises for the sharing and storing information. It is our premise that we are all part of this vast network of people and machines, and that we are all members working together as one race to improve ourselves. We are the Tree of Knowledge just as bees are a hive. And the hive is not just the some of the bees - but it is the hive structure itself and it is the honey.
And just as the hive includes the honey, the Tree of Knowledge includes not only the people, but also our houses, roads, bridges, airplanes, cars, computers, networks, books, countries, governments, religions, schools, hospitals, communication satellites, money, power distribution, dams, lakes, boats, trains, trucks, the things that make life work for us. And we are all part of that from the smallest villages to the vast cities.
But - who controls the super being - or does it control us? By the way - I am not referring to God here. Who decides what will be next? The premise of the Church of Reality is - we do. We believe that we as individuals can make a difference. Will our future be happy and prosperous? Or - are we heading for ultimate destruction or a hideous future where we become slaves to the machines we build - assuming the machines don't exterminate us. Some religions envision Armageddon. What will our future be and who will decide it?
The Church of Reality takes the position that our future depends on individuals making the right choices for the right reasons. We believe that we are ultimately responsible and are for the most part in control of our future. We believe that it is our responsibility to be responsible. It is up to us to decide how we are going to make decisions. To decide that we have an obligation to choose to choose rather than let things just happen. And that the process of making those choices should be done based on reality and not mythology. We believe that if we choose wisely were are far more likely to have a better tomorrow than if we choose poorly.
In order to choose wisely we have to be able to know how to be wise. We need to explore better ways of doing things and have some principles as to what better is. We need a sense of community and of purpose. The Church of Reality provides purpose to reality. The purpose is the Dharma of the Church to do the doing and know what needs to be known. In order to guide us, we create the Sacred Principles that define the concepts for which the Church of Reality is guided. These principles define our purpose and our method for achieving that purpose and provide a framework to accomplish the dharma of the church - which is the pursuit of reality by the human race.
There are thousands of religions that believe in a wide variety of different things. But which religion - if any - is the true religion? Who has it right? Are the Christians right? Are the Jews really the chosen people? The Muslims? Hindus? Buddhists? Mormons? Hare Krishnas? Or - there is us - the Church of Reality. But are we real or have we become corrupted like all the other religions have? I of course believe that my religion - reality - is the real religion. And I do have an advantage that a religion based on believing in everything that's real - and it doesn't get more real than reality. But - how do I know that this church isn't itself corrupted and has degenerated into an oppressive cult that uses reality as a brand name the same way the Justice Department uses the word "justice"?
The Church of Reality hereby asks the sacred question to all other religions and to ourselves and to everyone as individuals - is your religion real? Are your beliefs real? Did the things you believe happened really happen? How do you know that you are not living a lie? If I put you in a room with people from 10 other religions, can you articulate to these other people an objective reason that your religion is more real than their religion is? Do you even believe that your beliefs have to be real? Or - are you comfortable with the idea that it doesn't matter if what you believe is real or not?
Everyone believes their religion is real. But how do you know that you're not just brainwashed? How do you know that your core beliefs aren't just one big scam? When you look at other religions you shake your head wondering how people could possibly believe in them. When they look at your religion they think the same thing. When I look at both of your religions I think the same thing. But what about my religion? Everyone believes in their own religion. So then - why is your religion real?
One of the core reasons that this church exists is that there are too many religions and cults and other belief systems that have no connection to reality whatsoever. This leads to people behaving in ways that are harmful to the human race. For example - on 09-11-2001 hijackers hijacked 4 planes and crashed them into buildings for religious reasons. They believed that they would be rewarded by God with 70 virgins. Is there belief based on reality? I would hope not - otherwise - God is really weird. We look at this thinking that those Muslims are irrational, but Christians believe that God had to have his son murdered to prove some symbolic point about salvation and that belief is every bit as weird to me as crashing planes into buildings.
If these beliefs were put to the "is this real" test then maybe these guys wouldn't crash planes into buildings. Maybe Christians wouldn't be looking forward to the destruction of the world and take responsibility and help make our speck of dust in the universe a better place to live. Maybe people would quit wasting massive amounts of resources trying to create a fantasy world that gives them the illusion of security and self importance and redirect that effort towards making our real world a better place for all to live in.
Many religions are little more than a money scam. Religion is used to trick people and play upon their fears and hopes in order to control them. Billions of people are being duped into believing things that are totally baseless. This puts a huge toll on society and is costly not only to the believers themselves, but to society as a whole.
Almost everyone would agree that most religions fit into this classification. In fact - most people would say that about almost all religions but their own. Most people think they believe in the "True" religion and that their beliefs are real. But are they? I challenge everyone who reads this to ask the question, "How do I know that what I believe is real? How do I know I'm not being fooled like billions of other people?" To get people to ask the question - "Is my religion real?" is a goal of the Church of Reality and it applies especially to the Church of Reality itself. Because if the Church of Reality isn't about reality then it fails in it's mission.
We're going to get real. We're going to figure it out. We're going to make it work. We're going to talk about reality. We're going to challenge other people on their beliefs on the basis of what is real. We're going to ask the tough questions - questions that religions haven't been asked before. We're going to be Realists. We're going to make reality important again. We're going to ask people to prove it. We won't stand for lies and corruption. We say no to the cult mind. We will not let you steal reality from us. We are one people - one planet - and we are all here together. We will not sit back and let anyone destroy our world. We are all in this together and we are going to figure out how to make it work.
Many Christians believe that these are the "End Times". It is our job to ensure that these Christians are wrong about this.
There's a new kid in town and it's name is Reality - and we're here to stay. We are the Church of Reality. We are dedicated to reality the way it really is. We will compete for the religious mind space and we will convert you one minute at a time. Reality is something you can't run from and you can't hide from. We are the Realists - and we are now going to talk about what is and isn't real. The paradigm has shifted and reality is coming back.
We do need to watch that we don't get too arrogant in our relations with other cultures and religions. We have all been misled at some time or another and there are a lot of good people out there trying to do the right thing - but are honestly mistaken about what the right thing is. Some people have accepted bad information based on faith and trust in the wrong people. You can see in the tone of what I'm writing here that I do have some anger about the state of religion. Quite frankly - I would rather be writing spam filters.
The Bible was written thousands of years ago. No one knows who started it. It has been altered severely over the centuries with books added and deleted - new translations and interpretations - many new versions - and worshiped as a holy book. The myth is that in spite of all this, God has a hand in the evolution of the Bible and it is still "God's Word" and is 100% correct. God is - of course - all powerful - all knowing - perfect in every way - and therefore must have had a hand in protecting the integrity of his work. And that must also apply, I suppose, to at least most all translations and interpretations - even if they appear to contradict each other and the laws of physics. But is there a way - assuming an infinitely powerful God - to determine if the Bible is real or not? Sure there is. Lets apply some logic here.
Let's take the Bible literally at it's word and make the following assumptions:
God is Good - would never do anything bad.
God is all powerful and can do anything. Example: God created everything.
God is everywhere and knows everything - even the future.
The Bible is the Word of God.
So - taking this into account and also taking into account miracles and other such things, what can we conclude? And - how do we know that this isn't outside our understanding - or that I am being controlled by Satan and that what I'm writing is the work of the Devil. After all - maybe Satan is using me to get to you to try to pull you away from faith in Jesus and into a life of Sin and eternal damnation where your soul will burn in Hell for eternity! If you really believe that, you should close this browser window right now to protect yourself from my evil words and pray for forgiveness for visiting my site in the first place. Since I am not a Christian then I am clearly under the influence of Satan and you shouldn't be reading this. So don't read anything below the next line because it will be the Devil trying to steal your soul and it's a sin to expose yourself to this kind of Satanic temptation.
---- Disclaimer and Whacko Filter ----
Since I am not saved, everything on this site is the work of the Devil. I am one of Satan's minions and this site is designed to turn you away from salvation. If you actually believe this then you should close your browser now and flee the influence of Satan's power!
There is also a condition that is slightly above brain death where there is some level of consciousness but an inability to communicate. Some people might choose to end their lives when they are permanently incapacitated. Many of these people choose to live and to do the best with what they have left. Others might decide that their pain and suffering is more than they can deal with and choose not to continue.
The position of the Church of Reality is that the individual gets to make that choice. If the individual can't make that choice or can't communicate, then it is the right of the individual's family to make the choice on behalf of the patient. A severe permanent mental disability might be a fate that is far worse that a permanent vegetative state or death. It is important that we don't put someone in a state of perpetual torture from which there is no escape.
The Church of Reality takes the position that same-sex relationships is a personal choice. We take no moral position on same-sex relationships. From the standpoint of reproduction one could conclude that homosexuality is at worse a birth defect. But people with all kinds of birth defects have relationships and it's not up to the church to interfere with individual choice. People who are born with preferences for same-sex relationships or just choose to do so it something that consenting adults can choose to do.
The Church of Reality does recognize that there is a lot of science to support that sexual preferences are strongly influenced by their biology. We have the technology to turn men into women, women into men, and everything in between. Humans are far more chemically driven than we would like to admit. We encourage people to be ethical, honest, and understanding in relationships and we encourage heterosexuals to avoid being bigoted and hateful towards gay people.
On the other hand, homosexuality is not normal. It's not severely abnormal either and certainly is not sin or an abomination to God. The Church of Reality opposes the extremist war between religious hatred and gays who want to alter reality to promote an agenda that homosexual relationships are equivalent to heterosexual relationships. We are one planet, we are all here together, and we are going to figure out how to get along with each other. The Church of Reality supports sexual research to better understand the science, biology, and reality behind same-sex relationships and as realist we are commited to reality the way it really is.
Sounds kind of "tin foil hat" but we already are doing it. There's a device called a cochlear implant that this implant is a computer that converts sound to electrical impulses that are sent to the brain. Even though this implant is far less than what we think of as a "chip in the brain", it's close enough that you can see that it's coming.
Imagine what it would be like to have a computer implanted directly into the brain. The computers we have now are essentially an extension of the human mind. The only difference is that we interface to our present computers through our eyes and fingers. If the computer were implanted into the brain, then it would be more convenient. The computer is with you all the time and you don't have to use your eyes or fingers to access it.
Imagine what it could be like. You would never forget facts anymore. In your mind you would have huge lists of data. Phone numbers, addresses, names, street maps, all there in your mind. Need to do math - no problem. Do millions of calculations per second with 100% accuracy. Watches are no longer needed. You know what time it is to a fraction of a second and you can measure time with extreme precision. Add a GPS receiver and you would know exactly where you are all the time. And with some standard signal interfaces you can control all the devices in you house with a single thought. Direct mind to mind communication would also be possible. Sort of like email in you brain. You could even put a chip in your cat's brain. If the cat needs to go - the door opens to let it out.
This could all be wonderful as long as we do it right. But like all the new technology I've talked about, there's the dark side. Such a device can be used to enslave the population. It can be used to control the mind and force people to behave the way the government wants. They could even spy on your thoughts and execute you for wrong thinking.
This is a holiday designed for Jewish converts. Just as we have ripped off Christmas and Yule, we are also ripping off Chanukah. But this holiday is not limited to former Jews. Everyone can celebrate Two Cubed.
Two Cubed is celebrated on the same days that Chanukah is celebrated and it's a celebration of mathematics. Two Cubed is 2 to the third power - or 2*2*2 which is 8, the number of days in Chanukah. Two Cubed is celebrated for 8 days but the days are numbered 0 through 7 representing how computers count to 8. It is an educational holiday where children get to experience computers and mathematical principles and binary arithmetic.
For what it's worth - if Jews want to pick up on the ideas here, they can enhance and modernize their holiday by making it an educational opportunity. I have described this to several Jewish friends and they all like the idea. So - this is my gift to the Jews.
There is also a fake miracle behind this holiday. Many religions have fake miracles as the basis for holidays, so we shall have one too. The following paragraph is a parody for the amusement of the reader.
The story goes that First One was on an airplane flying from San Francisco to Washington DC and his laptop computer's battery only had been charged up enough to last one hour. But the First One started writing the Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality in flight and the battery miraculously lasted for 8 hours allowing the Sacred Principles to be saved before the battery died. (Some people dispute this account claiming that it was really a 5 hour flight crossing 3 time zones, and that the First One forgot that he put a second battery in the floppy drive bay.) Two Cubed celebrates this mythological miracle.
Like the Jews, we also have a Menorah. But our Menorah is different than the Jewish Menorah in that it has 3 candles instead of 8. That's because we count to 8 using binary numbers which takes only 3 candles.
Children are taught how to count from 0 to 7 using the candles. Jews are encouraged to use the 3 candled Menorah because it uses less candles and it is an educational opportunity. How many candles does it save? You figure it out.
Children below the age of 13 recite the first 8 powers of 2. Children 13 and older have to recite the first 16 powers of 2. If a child wants to be a smart ass, they can recite the first 32 powers of 2 - but if they get any of them wrong then they have to stand in the corner and count from 0 to 1023 on their fingers. On the first day we tell the Sacred Joke and everyone should understand why it is funny.
Kids are encouraged to solve brain teasers and are given presents of puzzles to solve. Kids are given ego treats for correct answers and other accomplishments. Contests are encouraged. Perhaps even 8 day contests for the more advanced kids. It's a celebration of logic, a time to debate, kids are encouraged to ask how stuff works and trips to planetariums are in order. It's a good time to take things apart and try to put them back together and to celebrate being smart. We teach that being smart is a good thing and we believe that if people try, they can become a little smarter than they are today.
We, as humans like to think of ourselves as special. The idea that we will die and simply cease to exist is a scary thought, and difficult to comprehend. We want to think that this planet is more than a speck of dust in the universe among trillions of other similar planets where there may be billions of life forms more advanced than us. We like to think of ourselves as above the animals and that somehow this planet is special, that humans are special, and that we as individuals are special. Therefore, we are ripe for wanting to believe religions that tell us what we want to hear, rather than what's true.
Christianity tells us what we want to hear. That there is an omnipotent parent figure in the sky who watches out for us, loves us, and that we are special. It says that we will never die, appeasing our need to believe we will live forever, in a better place, where all our problems go away. Do I want that, sure! Who wouldn't? But is it true? Unfortunately, no it's not. If you want to live forever you'll have a far better chance by donating your money to genetic research than to a religion. Something to consider the next time you write that check.
Sex is also a source of human denial. We humans are above the animals, we would believe, and we don't indulge in "instinct" because we are intelligent and we use "reason" and "logic" instead. Yes, we do, but reason and logic are newcomers and instinct has been around a lot longer and is a lot more powerful. And sex is the biggest example of behavior that puts us right there with the animals. It's pure instinct and there's very little difference in how we mate than every other creature that mates. In many cases, we aren't even as good at it as the average male dog.
Sex is a necessary human function. We are the decedents of 3 billion years of sex. There are people who have risen above their instincts to control their sexuality, but those people are not our ancestors. We are the descedants of those who failed to control their sexuality, or had no desire to control it. It's an instinct honed by billions of years of evolution, and much of our behavior is controlled by our sexual instincts.
Christianity is based on sexual denial and sex becomes the "work of the Devil". It equates sex with evil and irresistible temptations, caused by Satan, to steal the souls of Christians from God and subject you to eternal punishment. Sex is an easy target because when you're not having sex, it seems like bizarre behavior. Other instincts, like eating, breathing, drinking seem more natural and one would quickly die if denied. Therefore sex is the best target for redefinition as sin. But sex is life and without it we wouldn't be here. Yet Christians have criminalized human reproduction outside the domain of their control. If sex is immoral, then life is immoral.
The connection between creating a religion based on reality and writing software is very strong. Although writing software is more precise and predictable, it is nonetheless amazingly similar. In particular the logical organization of the structure is a very similar process. We're trying to figure out the overall design, what the human interface will look like, what features it will have, creating the documentation, and most importantly, how to attract and work with a community of developers. I see the model created by open source programming communities as being something that I really like in that it works well and achieves a goal in a very sane way. It's almost like religion and software have the same kind of connection as gravity and inertia.
Relativism has a direct affect on morality. If you start with basic assumptions about reality and those assumptions are wrong, and then you base your principles on those wrong assumptions, you are going to end up with a set of very twisted morals. Christians claim to have true reality and therefore their moral standards are correct because they come from God and God is always right. In their arguments that position everyone else's morals as being based on whatever they want to call reality and therefore right and wrong are whatever you want them to be. The presumption is that if there is no God to tell you what is right and what is wrong, then there is no right and wrong.
However - quite frankly - right and wrong are in fact completely subjective. In pure science there is no right and wrong. In pure science the universe is stars exploding and galaxies colliding and suns being sucked into black holes. Whatever happens, happens. We humans have artificially created right and wrong and it is in relation to what we need or what we want. For example, if you aren't a vegetarian, it's moral to eat cows. But suppose that cows were intelligent like us and they were the ones writing the rules of morality. Do you think cows would consider it moral for humans to eat them? I rather doubt it. To cows, we are predators who kill and eat them. From their moral perspective killing humans would be a noble deed because they are protecting themselves from predators. Our morality is based solely on what is good for us. And even if you believe it is moral to protect other species, it's only because protecting other species is good for humans.
The Church of Reality understands this concept and we have made certain choices that create the foundation of our moral code. We have decided that our existence is important to us and that we choose to explore and to understand our reality and our existence. We have chosen positive evolution over extinction. Since we are humans, the right and wrong are based on humans evolving forward and exploring reality. Whatever helps that to happen is generally good and what prevents that from happening is generally bad. From these assumptions and choices we derived the Sacred Principles and the Sacred Missions. Our moral code and the basis for civil law is a logical extension of this process.
Christian morality is totally different than the natural morality of the Church of Reality. It is based loosely on a wide variety of interpretations of the Bible. The problem with using the Bible for your moral code is that the Bible says some really bizarre and dangerous things. For example, people quote the Ten Commandments, which are from the Old Testament. But the same books that the Ten Commandments come from say that people who work on the Sabbath should be put to death. Christian morality includes a mandate to impose their religion on the entire planet and it envisions the world ending in Armageddon, what would be the extinction of the human race. They are anti-science, against free thought, and they consider doubt to be an unforgivable sin. In contrast, mass murder is a forgivable sin.
Christian moral standards prohibit free thinking.
Relativism in morality and law, especially if it is Christian relativism, is not only wrong but is dangerous. The moral standards of the Church of Reality are in direct conflict with the relativistic moral standards of pure Christianity. Fortunately, most Christians don't know what their own religion is about and don't take it that seriously. However radical Christian fundamentalists, who call themselves Dominionists, are trying to make a world wide power grab to enslave the world as they attempted to do during the Crusades. It is part of our moral mandate to ensure that never happens.
Whether one believes that the canonical gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke & John) are partly fictional elaborations of some core of truth, or whether you believe they are entirely fictional is not the issue at this point. (What I see as a separate issue of their fictional or non-fictional status will be taken up in the next point.) The question here is simply, were the gospels written by human witnesses to the “life and times” of the putative Jesus? This point can be handled quite briefly. The answer is a resounding “No!” There is virtual unanimity of opinion by all un-brainwashed, rational biblical scholars—even so-called Christian scholars (perhaps an oxymoron)—that the gospels were written by now unknown writers anytime between 40 years after Jesus’ time up to about 185 years after his supposed death, depending on what scholar one consults. Most scholars place Mark, the generally recognized first written gospel, at about the year 70 CE, just after the destruction of the Jewish temple of Yahweh. However, Earl Doherty has advanced some closely reasoned arguments that support a time “around the years 85 to 90 CE.” (The Jesus Puzzle, p. 3).
Famed Jesus scholar, Dr. G. A Wells summarizes in his 1988 book, The Historical Evidence for Jesus, “The gospels are usually put between 70 and 110, with Mark at about 70, Matthew and Luke a little later, and John, the latest, at about 100. Acts (written as we shall see, by the author of Luke) and some of the pseudo-Pauline epistles are assigned to the turn of the century. I find all this convincing enough, except in the case of Mark, which I date at about 90 rather than 70. If this is correct, then all four gospels were written soon after 90 and drew some of their material from earlier documents which have not survived and from oral tradition, much of which must have been available from about 80, although it would have taken time for them to have become generally disseminated.” (Wells, op. cit. p. 10 & 11).
There is near unanimous agreement that the very first mention of the existence of what we now call the gospels was by Justin Martyr, in the 150s. Doherty says, however, that he may only have known of Matthew and Luke. “Even at that, he does not refer to them by name, calling the documents he is quoting from ‘memoirs of the Apostles.’ Moreover, his quotations for the most part do not agree with our present texts.” (The Jesus Puzzle, p. 259) So, it seems that the “eyewitness testimony” of the so-called “apostles” was still being sort of “worked out” a century and a half after J.C.’s supposed birth.
The Sacred Direction is forward - onward and upward. Our world view is Futurism not Dogmatism. Our Principle of Positive Evolution commits us to envision a future that is better than today. We are one planet and we are all in this together on our little ball in the universe. In order to answer the Sacred Question and explore our reality, society must evolve forward.
In order for us to explore reality the way it really is, we have to continue to evolve forward. We need to become a better society. We need to develop new technology. We need to find better ways to feed ourselves, to cure diseases, to keep our environment clean, to advance the sciences, to educate our children, to understand our minds, to live in peace with one another, and to have a fair and just society. These things cause us to progress and to move forward as a human race so that we can understand our world and the universe of which we are a part.
Praise and Blame refer to a system of rewards and punishments used to control your behavior. They use praise when you do something good and blame when you do something bad. Sounds like normal child rearing so far but it doesn't stop there. Some praise and blame is normal. But cult control takes it to an extreme. Cults need to enslave you to survive. Praise and blame are the must common tools to do that with.
The process appeals to the human need to do good things. Since humanity has evolved around the Tree of Knowledge and our success as a species is tied to our ability to plug into society, our need to be an upstanding member is hard wired into our brains, just like fear, sex, and the need to find food. We are more like bees in that respect. A bee is nothing without the hive. It dies when separated from the hive. Humans will often kill themselves as a result of social shunning. And for many people there is no greater thrill than to be praised by your peers. We want to accomplish great things and rise in social position within the group. Social position give us respect and power and authority. Women are attracted to the powerful males creating more opportunities to spread one's DNA around.
On an instinctive level, we also want to be part of the Tree of Knowledge. We are aware of our limited existence and we want to continue to live in some form after we are gone. We want people to remember our name and who we are and the great things we accomplish. We want to go down in history as heroes who fought and died for some great cause, or at least be part of a group that goes down in history for some great cause. Our instinct to be part of the Tree of Knowledge is so strong that we will sacrifice our lives to make that happen. It is this kind of biological commitment to community that has made the human race rise to the top of the evolutionary chain.
There is however a down side to this need to be a respected member of the community. The down side is that it can be exploited. This need is far more powerful than people realize. But cults realize it and they have become experts at exploiting it. They can make you jump through hoops like a trained animal. And that's why most of the world is a slave to some form of cult. I would say that less that one percent of humanity comes close to the standard of what I consider free. The rest are slaves to the cult mind.
When you join a cult they start off with the carrot. They tell you that you are a very special person who was led to them through divine inspiration to be a member of an elite group of special people who are on a special mission to accomplish great things. You are one of the good people who is in a desperate battle with the forces of evil that are taking over the universe. Your decision to join forces might be the tipping point for the triumph of Good over Evil, where your refusal to join might result in Evil winning, and it will be your fault if that happens.
Everything becomes black and white. You are either with us or you are against us. If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. Are you an "us" or a "them"? There is no middle ground. Evil people serve the evil master and everything they do is evil. They are sinners and Infidels who are unworthy and deserve death. We however "are washed in the blood of the lamb" and our sins are forgiven. The idea that non-members have a role in society and that they are contributing is unthinkable. The don't see people as having some good aspects and some bad aspects and that you can improve them a little and help people evolve forward. They are the enemy, and the enemy is to be destroyed.
Once you are in, the reprogramming begins. You are a student, a disciple, and they are the wise masters. they are right and you are wrong. You have to accept what you are being taught. After all, this is all new to you. You are learning the secret ways so obviously the possibility of you being right and the master being wrong is highly unlikely. You are being taught a different way of thinking. You are being reprogrammed. The lesson isn't what you think it is though. What you are being taught to believe is what you are told to believe without question. You are being trained to be a sock puppet.
A sock puppet is a person who is totally controlled by the cult mind.
You are taught that you are important and that you are being trained for an important mission. You are being evaluated by the other group members who are all concerned about each other's spiritual progress. You are required to seek their praise and avoid their blame. Social position is everything within the group and it is often very competitive. They feed you ego treats to get you really addicted to your self importance, and then take them away to punish you for failing to behave.
The use of praise and blame is a common mind control trick. Once a person is fully addicted, they will do anything, say anything, believe anything in order to get their ego fix. The life of a sock puppet is a life of fear, always having to worry if they are good enough. They are given impossible goals which they never can achieve which puts them in a state of perpetual failure. First they feed the ego, then they starve it. Progress is measured in obedience.
Cults are about the suppression of freedom. They punish independent thinking. Faith is required and doubt is punished. In contrast, the Church of Reality requires doubt. Blind faith is considered bullshit. We encourage a diversity of viewpoints as a way of coming up with fresh ideas. We, however, must ourselves be vigilant to avoid the praise and blame game and not fall into the same traps where we divide into masters and starry eyed groupies who suck up information like a sponge and parrot it back without thinking. Sometimes people become sock puppets and just hop from cult to cult looking for someone to enslave them in a way they feel better about. That's why we require people to ponder reality so that they can become themselves and invent new things for the Tree of Knowledge.
We have a concept called Intellectual Tithing where we give back new ideas to the Tree of Knowledge. New ideas require innovative thinking which means that people have to think outside the box. You can't come up with a new idea if you are just parroting church dogma. Intellectual Tithing creates a process where explorers develop the skills of independent thinking. It creates an environment for new idea to emerge and be presented for discussion, scrutiny, and doubt testing. This not only makes humanity smarter, but it strengthens the mind and makes people more immune to cult based thinking.
This religion isn't about reality is it? It's all about Marc Perkel - the founder of the Church of Reality. That's why he is the First One. Perhaps reality is just a ploy to suck everyone in. After all, how can you not believe in reality? But is it really about reality or is Marc Perkel just trying to create the ultimate cult where he rules the world and enslaves the world forcing everyone to believe the way he does. Perhaps Perkel secretly thinks that he is God and that if enough people believe in him, that he will become God.
Or perhaps his goals are more modest. He's just trying to build a financial empire like the rest of the TV preachers living in a 35 million dollar mansion with a $15,000 air conditioned dog house. A life of drugs and debauchery with hundreds of women in his harem known as the Sacred Sluts. Perkel always has to be right and he thinks he's the smartest man in the entire universe. He secretly laughs at Realists and believes reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle drugs. It's all about fame, power, sex, drugs, rock 'n roll, tossing virgins into volcanoes, and rolling around naked in the church money room. All in a futile attempt to convince himself that he's not really the pathetic loser that everyone knows he is. Besides, he has to do something because he doesn't have a college education and can't hold a real job.
Or maybe he's just trying to fix the world so that he can some day retire with his childhood sweetheart in a world of peace and tranquility.
So - the big question. When they make the movie about the life of Marc Perkel, what actor should play his part? Jon Lovitz, Tom Cruise, Mike Meyers, or Michael Moore?
Or - maybe it really is all about real reality the way it really is. could the Church of Reality be real and not just another scam? Figure it out!
According to the rules of faith-based salvation, you are saved by faith and not by works. Faith-based salvation contemplates virtually unlimited forgiveness for any sins. It is what you believe in that counts, not what you do with your life.
Now - I do understand that this isn't a blank check to murder steal and pillage because Jesus will forgive anything. In fact, I'll write up a definition that perhaps Christians will quote on how faith-based salvation works. Being saved is sort of like an insurance policy. It covers you if you sin, even if it's a big sin. Just like your insurance policy covers you if you crash your car and kill someone, even if it's your fault. But, like auto insurance, you can't deliberately crash your car knowing that you'll be covered, and if you abuse the coverage they will revoke your insurance. So - I do admit that although salvation is by faith and not by works, you do have to do a little something to show you are really on board with the faith thing.
Having said that however, faith by definition is the belief in things that can not be proven, because once it is proven then it's science and no longer faith.
What is of concern here is that there are two worlds. "This World" is the world of science and reality and it is materialistic and physical, full of sex and evolution and black holes, and quantum singularities, logic, reason, space-time, atoms, and gravity. This world is inherently evil and ruled by Satan. This is the world of the Church of Reality.
The real claim behind faith-based salvation is that you are saved only by giving up reality.
Then there's this "other world" which is like a parallel universe with a completely different set of rules. This world is the world where God lives. It is the spiritual world that one can experience only through faith that allows the mind to communicate with this other world. In this other world there is no science. It is the world of miracles where anything and everything is possible. It is the world of "the spirit" that created this physical world as some sort of "test" to see if your soul will find it's way back to the "other world". Those who hear the calling will be rewarding with eternal life in paradise and all others will be tortured forever in Hell.
What this implies is that there is a reality outside of reality which is in itself a contradiction in terms. It implies that, in this alternate reality, if I can call it such, concepts like proof and facts don't exist. It is outside of science which is of "this world". In fact, how can you even call such a parallel world "real" when such a term is outside the framework of this "other world"?
The spiritual world is completely different from one person to the next. It has properties that are more consistent with imagination than reality.
So - here's the problem. Billions of people believe in this other world. If their beliefs about this other world were consistent, that is, if everyone who believed in the other world all believed the same thing, then that would be interesting. But the reality is that there is nothing at all consistent about people's experience of the "other world". As it turns out, everyone's other world is completely different than everyone else's other world. So there isn't "another world", there are billions of other worlds. There are as many other world's as one can imagine. Which raises the question, is there another world, or is it just our own individual imaginations?
I believe that it is irresponsible to invent an imaginary world with an imaginary set of rules and try to pass it off as something that is more important than reality itself. I think that it is a sin to call reality evil and say that reality is somehow "Satan's World" and that the world of imagination is somehow superior to real reality as it really is.
I find it interesting that believers who claim to support moral certainty and criticize non-believers on the basis of "personal reality", are in fact doing the same thing themselves. Believers seem to believe that they can do whatever their imagination makes them think, that God is telling them to do and that makes it right. I suppose it would be OK if there really was a God who was really telling them what to do. But, if there was a real God telling people what to do, then the message from this single source would be consistent. We know that the God of the Christians and the God of the Muslims is not the same God. What is really happening here is that people are expressing their self-centered personal realities and trying to justify it by claiming that an outside divine power is speaking through them when the reality is - they are at best just fooling themselves. We realists contend that impersonating a deity is dishonest and irresponsible.
The Sacred Principle of Peace is a fundamental principle of the Church of Reality. We are committed to the Principle of Positive Evolution that society should evolve forward towards a better tomorrow and away from extinctionism. Our quest to understand reality the way it really is depends on a peaceful sane civilization. It is therefore contrary to our religious beliefs to participate in a war that is unjust, immoral, or illegal. Members of the Church of Reality are required to shun such wars. We are a religion of Peace. Members of the Church of Reality are required to do whatever it takes to avoid supporting an unjust cause.
Realists live throughout the world. Sometime we live in countries that are the "good guys". Sometimes we live in countries that are the "bad guys". In both cases the home nation will call on it's young men and women to go to war claiming that it is the duty to the nation to participate in the battle to defend the homeland. In such a case if your nation's cause hasn't risen to the standard of moral justification for war, then it is the duty of the Realist not only to refuse to fight for the unjust cause, but to actively ensure the failure of such cause.
Nations come and go but reality is forever. Nations rise and fall and many once great kingdoms are at best a means of job security for Archeologists who's job it is to figure out what they did wrong to become an extinct culture. Realists do not act in a way to promote extinction but rather evolution. We are thinkers and we look at the big picture and we commit to a higher purpose than short term disputes over land, wealth, religious differences, and other petty issues.
Nations of the world, listen up! The Church of Reality hereby refuses to further your military cause unless we determine it is in the best interest of the advancement of humanity.
Many nations allow people to opt out of war based upon their religious beliefs. If their religion prohibits war, they can get a religious exemption. The Church of Reality is such a religion and a Realist can draw upon our policies and beliefs as justification to refuse military service.
Different nations have different standards regarding the qualifications of the religious beliefs that are acceptable to be exempt from forced military service. Some nation states require that you be opposed to all wars, not just the wars you don't like. In their view, the religion is either fully against war or it is not. Some religions are against all wars under all conditions. Other religions take no position on forced military service. Our position requires that war is only justified if it passes the highest level of scrutiny of justification. Support for a war requires a consensus of the Council of Realists. Without such affirmative statement of consensus, the war is unjustified and against our religious beliefs.
Our religion requires people to think. We are prohibited from accepting the justification for war on "faith" in our resident nation state. Thinking and deciding for ourselves is part of our core belief system. We are a doubt based religion and we shall not be denied our doubt. Our Principle of Compassion requires that we feel empathy for our adversaries. Our Principle of Justice requires that we fight for the just cause only. Our Principle of Inclusiveness requires that we resist religious and racial hatred. We believe that nationalism is a mental disorder that is contrary to the advancement of humanity. The Principle of Scrutiny and Doubt requires us to question our actions to determine for ourselves and as a Church, what wars are justified and what wars are not. Our Principle of Wisdom requires that we rise above the herd mind and think for ourselves. Our Principle of Personal Responsibility requires that we make sure that we choose what is the right thing to do and that we do it. Our Principle of Bullshit prohibits us from participating in a bullshit war. And our Principle of Activism requires us to actively resist causes that are unjust.
We are one planet, We are all here together. It is our duty to figure out how to live in peace and to do what it takes to make that happen.
The belief systems in the Church of Reality are different than most other religions in that we are a reality based religion. Most religions have limited resolution in their faith relying upon their holy books as to if war is permitted or not. We are different in that we are reality based and we think things through and therefore we have infinite resolution in our moral evaluation process. We are required to think about each situation individually and apply wisdom to make the correct determination. One of our Sacred Missions is to ask the Sacred Moral Question - what is good. So even though the basis for a religious exemption in some religions might be all or nothing, in the Church of Reality it would be an infringement of our religious beliefs if we were forced to treat all war as being equal.
In a further message to the militaries and nation states of the world, it is the duty of all realists to act for the betterment of humanity and that the nation state of residence is of no consequence. If a Realist is forced to serve in a military unit, it is the duty of the Realist to undermine the military from within and to bring down the fighting force for which they are compelled to serve. We want to make it clear that Realists are not the kind of people that you want to force to serve in a war for an unjust cause because they will destroy you from within. To a realist, being forced to serve in an unjust war is an opportunity to destroy you from within.
If that cause is just, a Realist is the military's best resource. If the cause is unjust, then the Realist is your worst nightmare. Our message to the world is, if you are contemplating war, you better take reality into account.
If you're old enough to get pregnant you are old enough to make decisions about contraception and abortion.
Any woman who gets pregnant is considered to be old enough to choose to have an abortion if she so desires. Our position is that if you are old enough to get pregnant, you are old enough to decide to terminate the pregnancy. The decision to reproduce or not to reproduce has life altering consequences and even though it is a hard decision for anyone, especially a minor, to make, it is a matter of that the individual has to live with the consequences of that decision and it is therefore up to her to make that choice. If the choice is the wrong choice, it is still her wrong choice to make. If a girl is 10 years old and she's pregnant it's still her choice to make under Church of Reality doctrine.
This is a document that I lifted from a pro evolution web site that details the strategy of how these Christians are going to undermine science. The attempt in itself is an example of an evolutionary principle. As technology increases and we have more scientific information about reality, belief systems that support young earth creationism are being threatened with extinction. These religions are trying to adapt so that they can survive in a fiction hostile environment. Their strategy is to attack science itself. This is their plan.
Creationism is evolving into Intelligent Design
THE WEDGE STRATEGY
CENTER FOR THE RENEWAL OF SCIENCE & CULTURE
INTRODUCTION
The proposition that human beings are created in the image of God
is one of the bedrock principles on which Western civilization was
built. Its influence can be detected in most, if not all, of the
West's greatest achievements, including representative democracy,
human rights, free enterprise, and progress in the arts and
sciences.
Yet a little over a century ago, this cardinal idea came under
wholesale attack by intellectuals drawing on the discoveries of
modern science. Debunking the traditional conceptions of both God and
man, thinkers such as Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud
portrayed humans not as moral and spiritual beings, but as animals or
machines who inhabited a universe ruled by purely impersonal forces
and whose behavior and very thoughts were dictated by the unbending
forces of biology, chemistry, and environment. This materialistic
conception of reality eventually infected virtually every area of our
culture, from politics and economics to literature and art
The cultural consequences of this triumph of materialism were
devastating. Materialists denied the existence of objective moral
standards, claiming that environment dictates our behavior and
beliefs. Such moral relativism was uncritically adopted by much of
the social sciences, and it still undergirds much of modern
economics, political science, psychology and sociology.
Materialists also undermined personal responsibility by asserting
that human thoughts and behaviors are dictated by our biology and
environment. The results can be seen in modern approaches to criminal
justice, product liability, and welfare. In the materialist scheme of
things, everyone is a victim and no one can be held accountable for
his or her actions.
Finally, materialism spawned a virulent strain of utopianism.
Thinking they could engineer the perfect society through the
application of scientific knowledge, materialist reformers advocated
coercive government programs that falsely promised to create heaven
on earth.
Discovery Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and
Culture seeks nothing less than the overthrow of materialism and its
cultural legacies. Bringing together leading scholars from the
natural sciences and those from the humanities and social sciences,
the Center explores how new developments in biology, physics and
cognitive science raise serious doubts about scientific materialism
and have re-opened the case for a broadly theistic understanding of
nature. The Center awards fellowships for original research, holds
conferences, and briefs policymakers about the opportunities for life
after materialism.
The Center is directed by Discovery Senior Fellow Dr. Stephen
Meyer. An Associate Professor of Philosophy at Whitworth College, Dr.
Meyer holds a Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from
Cambridge University. He formerly worked as a geophysicist for the
Atlantic Richfield Company.
THE WEDGE STRATEGY
Phase I.
Scientific Research, Writing & Publicity
Phase II.
Publicity & Opinion-making
Phase III.
Cultural Confrontation & Renewal
THE WEDGE PROJECTS
Phase I. Scientific Research, Writing & Publication
Individual Research Fellowship Program
Paleontology Research program (Dr. Paul Chien et al.)
Molecular Biology Research Program (Dr. Douglas Axe et
al.)
Phase II. Publicity & Opinion-making
Book Publicity
Opinion-Maker Conferences
Apologetics Seminars
Teacher Training Program
Op-ed Fellow
PBS (or other TV) Co-production
Publicity Materials / Publications
Phase III. Cultural Confrontation & Renewal
Academic and Scientific Challenge Conferences
Potential Legal Action for Teacher Training
Research Fellowship Program: shift to social sciences and
humanities
FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN SUMMARY
The social consequences of materialism have been devastating. As
symptoms, those consequences are certainly worth treating. However,
we are convinced that in order to defeat materialism, we must cut it
off at its source. That source is scientific materialism. This is
precisely our strategy. If we view the predominant materialistic
science as a giant tree, our strategy is intended to function as a
"wedge" that, while relatively small, can split the trunk when
applied at its weakest points. The very beginning of this strategy,
the "thin edge of the wedge," was Phillip ]ohnson's critique of
Darwinism begun in 1991 in Darwinism on Trial, and continued in
Reason in the Balance and Defeatng Darwinism by Opening Minds.
Michael Behe's highly successful Darwin's Black Box followed
Johnson's work. We are building on this momentum, broadening the
wedge with a positive scientific alternative to materialistic
scientific theories, which has come to be called the theory of
intelligent design (ID). Design theory promises to reverse the
stifling dominance of the materialist worldview, and to replace it
with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions.
The Wedge strategy can be divided into three distinct but
interdependent phases, which are roughly but not strictly
chronological. We believe that, with adequate support, we can
accomplish many of the objectives of Phases I and II in the next five
years (1999-2003), and begin Phase III (See "Goals/ Five Year
Objectives/Activities").
Phase I: Research, Writing and Publication
Phase II: Publicity and Opinion-making
Phase III: Cultural Confrontation and Renewal
Phase I is the essential component of everything that comes
afterward. Without solid scholarship, research and argument, the
project would be just another attempt to indoctrinate instead of
persuade. A lesson we have learned from the history of science is
that it is unnecessary to outnumber the opposing establishment.
Scientific revolutions are usually staged by an initially small and
relatively young group of scientists who are not blinded by the
prevailing prejudices and who are able to do creative work at the
pressure points, that is, on those critical issues upon which whole
systems of thought hinge. So, in Phase I we are supporting vital
witting and research at the sites most likely to crack the
materialist edifice.
Phase II. The pnmary purpose of Phase II is to prepare the
popular reception of our ideas. The best and truest research can
languish unread and unused unless it is properly publicized. For this
reason we seek to cultivate and convince influential individuals in
pnnt and broadcast media, as well as think tank leaders, scientists
and academics, congressional staff, talk show hosts, college and
seminary presidents and faculty, future talent and potential academic
allies. Because of his long tenure in politics, journalism and public
policy, Discovery President Bruce Chapman brings to the project rare
knowledge and acquaintance of key op-ed writers, journalists, and
political leaders. This combination of scientific and scholarly
expertise and media and political connections makes the Wedge unique,
and also prevents it from being "merely academic." Other activities
include production of a PBS documentary on intelligent design and its
implications, and popular op-ed publishing. Alongside a focus on
influential opinion-makers, we also seek to build up a popular base
of support among our natural constituency, namely, Chnstians. We will
do this primarily through apologetics seminars. We intend these to
encourage and equip believers with new scientific evidence's that
support the faith, as well as to "popularize" our ideas in the
broader culture.
Phase III. Once our research and writing have had time to
mature, and the public prepared for the reception of design theory,
we will move toward direct confrontation with the advocates of
materialist science through challenge conferences in significant
academic settings. We will also pursue possible legal assistance in
response to resistance to the integration of design theory into
public school science curricula. The attention, publicity, and
influence of design theory should draw scientific materialists into
open debate with design theorists, and we will be ready. With an
added emphasis to the social sciences and humanities, we will begin
to address the specific social consequences of materialism and the
Darwinist theory that supports it in the sciences.
GOALS
Governing Goals
To defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral,
cultural and political legacies.
To replace materialistic explanations with the theistic
understanding that nature and hurnan beings are created by
God.
Five Year Goals
To see intelligent design theory as an accepted alternative in
the sciences and scientific research being done from the
perspective of design theory.
To see the beginning of the influence of design theory in
spheres other than natural science.
To see major new debates in education, life issues, legal and
personal responsibility pushed to the front of the national
agenda.
Twenty Year Goals
To see intelligent design theory as the dominant perspective
in science.
To see design theory application in specific fields, including
molecular biology, biochemistry, paleontology, physics and
cosmology in the natural sciences, psychology, ethics, politics,
theology and philosophy in the humanities; to see its innuence in
the fine arts.
To see design theory permeate our religious, cultural, moral
and political life.
FIVE YEAR OBJECTIVES
1. A major public debate between design theorists and Darwinists
(by 2003)
2. Thirty published books on design and its cultural implications
(sex, gender issues, medicine, law, and religion)
3. One hundred scientific, academic and technical articles by our
fellows
4. Significant coverage in national media:
Cover story on major news magazine such as Time or
Newsweek
PBS show such as Nova treating design theory fairly
Regular press coverage on developments in design theory
Favorable op-ed pieces and columns on the design movement by
3rd party media
5. Spiritual & cultural renewal:
Mainline renewal movements begin to appropriate insights from
design theory, and to repudiate theologies influenced by
materialism
Major Christian denomination(s) defend(s) traditional doctrine
of creation & repudiate(s)
Positive uptake in public opinion polls on issues such as
sexuality, abortion and belief in God
6. Ten states begin to rectify ideological imbalance in their
science curricula & include design theory
7. Scientific achievements:
An active design movement in Israel, the UK and other
influential countries outside the US
Ten CRSC Fellows teaching at major universities
Two universities where design theory has become the dominant
view
Design becomes a key concept in the social sciences Legal
reform movements base legislative proposals on design theory
ACTVITIES
(1) Research Fellowship Program (for writing and publishing)
(2) Front line research funding at the "pressure points" (e.g.,
Daul Chien's Chengjiang Cambrian Fossil Find in paleontology, and
Doug Axe's research laboratory in molecular biology)
(3) Teacher training
(4) Academic Conferences
(5) Opinion-maker Events & Conferences
(6) Alliance-building, recruitment of future scientists and
leaders, and strategic partnerships with think tanks, social advocacy
groups, educational organizations and institutions, churches,
religious groups, foundations and media outlets
(7) Apologetics seminars and public speaking
(8) Op-ed and popular writing
(9) Documentaries and other media productions
(10) Academic debates
(11) Fund Raising and Development
(12) General Administrative support
THE WEDGE STRATEGY PROGRESS SUMMARY
Books
William Dembski and Paul Nelson, two CRSC Fellows, will very soon
have books published by major secular university publishers,
Cambridge University Press and The University of Chicago Press,
respectively. (One critiques Darwinian materialism; the other offers
a powerful altenative.)
Nelson's book, On Common Descent, is the seventeenth book in the
prestigious University of Chicago "Evolutionary Monographs" series
and the first to critique neo-Dacwinism. Dembski's book, The Design
Inference, was back-ordered in June, two months prior to its release
date.
These books follow hard on the heals of Michael Behe's Darwin's
Black Box (The Free Press) which is now in paperback after nine print
runs in hard cover. So far it has been translated into six foreign
languages. The success of his book has led to other secular
publishers such as McGraw Hill requesting future titles from us. This
is a breakthrough.
InterVarsity will publish our large anthology, Mere Creation
(based upon the Mere Creation conference) this fall, and Zondervan is
publishing Maker of Heaven and Earth: Three Views of the
Creation-Evolution Contoversy, edited by fellows John Mark Reynolds
and J.P. Moreland.
McGraw Hill solicited an expedited proposal from Meyer, Dembski
and Nelson on their book Uncommmon Descent. Finally, Discovery Fellow
Ed Larson has won the Pulitzer Prize for Summer for the Gods, his
retelling of the Scopes Trial, and InterVarsity has just published
his co-authored attack on assisted suicide, A Different Death.
Academic Articles
Our fellows recently have been featured or published articles in
major sciendfic and academic journals in The Proceedings to the
National Academy of Sciences, Nature, The Scientist, The American
Biology Teacher, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,
Biochemirtry, Philosophy and Biology, Faith & Philosophy,
American Philosophical Quarterly, Rhetoric & Public Affairs,
Analysis, Book & Culture, Ethics & Medicine, Zygon,
Perspectives on Science and the Christian Faith, Relgious Studies,
Christian Scholars' Review, The Southern Journal ofPhilosophy, and
the Journal of Psychalogy and Theology. Many more such articles are
now in press or awaiting review at major secular journals as a result
of our first round of research fellowships. Our own journal, Origins
& Design, continues to feature scholarly contribudons from CRSC
Fellows and other scientists.
Television and Radio Appearances
During 1997 our fellows appeared on numerous radio programs (both
Christian and secular) and five nationally televised programs,
TechnoPolitics, Hardball with Chris Matthews, Inside the Law, Freedom
Speaks, and Firing Line. The special edition of TechnoPolitics that
we produced with PBS in November elicited such an unprecedented
audience response that the producer Neil Freeman decided to air a
second episode from the "out takes." His enthusiasm for our
intellectual agenda helped stimulate a special edition of William F.
Buckley's Firing Line, featuring Phillip Johnson and two of our
fellows, Michael Behe and David Berlinski. At Ed Atsinger's
invitation, Phil Johnson and Steve Meyer addressed Salem
Communications' Talk Show Host conference in Dallas last November. As
a result, Phil and Steve have been interviewed several times on Salem
talk shows across the country. For example, in ]uly Steve Meyer
and Mike Behe were interviewed for two hours on the nationally
broadcast radio show ]anet Parshall's America. Canadian Public
Radio (CBC) recently featured Steve Meyer on their Tapestry program.
The episode, "God & the Scientists," has aired all across Canada.
And in April, William Craig debated Oxford atheist Peter Atkins in
Atlanta before a large audience (moderated by William F. Buckley),
which was broadcast live via satellite link, local radio, and intenet
"webcast."
Newspaper and Magazine Articles
The Firing Line debate generated positive press coverage for our
movement in, of all places, The New York Times, as well as a column
by Bill Buckley. In addition, our fellows have published recent
articles & op-eds in both the secular and Christian press,
including, for example, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times,
The Washington Times, National Review, Commentary, Touchstone, The
Detroit News, The Boston Review, The Seattle Post-lntelligenter,
Christianity Toady, Cosmic Pursuits and World. An op-ed piece by
Jonathan Wells and Steve Meyer is awaiting publication in the
Washington Post. Their article criticizes the National Academy of
Science book Teaching about Evolution for its selective and
ideological presentation of scientific evidence. Similar articles are
in the works.
This isn't just talk. The Center for Renewal of Science and Culture created a fake science site at Discovery.org where they are implementing their plan.
There are some very interesting aspects of this plan. First - there is no limit to the level of deception the proponents of creationism are willing to accept. It flies in the face of their assertion that non believers are subject to moral relativism and lack personal responsibility. What is interesting here is a common misperception that Atheists have no Moral Compass. That without God there is no right from wrong. If these people are inspired by the spirit of God and their God is leading them to lie, then what does that say about their God? It tells me that the God they believe in is a dishonest God. What is it that Christians say? "By their fruits you shall know them."
Ignoring for a moment the moral implications of generating fake science to promote a religious objective, an act that can be considered a sin against reality itself, it does show a deep concern that most religions have that there should be such a thing as objective morality and that Right and Wrong mean something. Like us, they strive for Moral Certainty. Objectivists like Ayn Rand are partially to blame for this misconception in her disdain for altruism and advocacy of selfishness. It would be interesting to see what these people would think of our moral values. I doubt they would accept them. but I would hope that they would at least see that we are a lot more moral than they think we are.
For the record, this level of dishonesty is far beyond what is acceptable for the Church of Reality. We would hope that we never have to stoop to this level to try to win a point. We believe the idea of using immoral means to promote morality is fundamentally flawed. This document provided the inspiration to add Honesty to our doctrine.
Some people believe that if a person gets a "fair trial" and is convicted, that they deserve to die even though they are innocent. In fact the United States Supreme Court has ruled that way. People think that with all the appeals a prisoner gets that surely justice would be accurate, but that's not the case. The way the system works is, if you are convicted at trial, an appeal is not a new trial. It is mostly only about if the original trial followed certain procedures, not if they came to the correct conclusion. If the process itself is flawed then a reexamination of the flawed process to determine if the flawed process was correctly followed is still flawed.
The bottle line is that the courts are getting it wrong. An example of that is in the state of Illinois, the pro death penalty governor commuted the death sentences of all death row inmates because he determined that at least half of the people who were being executed were in fact innocent. The process of determining guilt is so bad that we are killing a huge number of innocent people. Police often lie about what happens. Torture is often used to get confessions that are used at trial. Governments, including the United States, have allowed convictions to stand based on confessions obtained under torture. Testimony by people claiming the defendant confessed are obtained through bribes. Prosecutors often fabricate evidence to convict people when the evidence is insufficient. Fraud is more common than rare, and people are being killed by the state as a result.
The separation of church and state is an important issue for maintaining religious freedom in any nation state. When one religion takes control, other religions are no longer welcome. In most cases, other religions are actively oppressed. There are many religions that think they are right. We, as Realists, are no exception. The Church of Reality is our attempt to create a reality-based religion, and it will be up to history to judge if we have succeeded or not. But for now we are just one of many religions who think they have a better handle on reality than anyone else. We are not the only reality-based religion.
When a government takes control of religion or religion takes control of a government, bad things happen. Religious opinion becomes the law of the land. Islamic nations are quite comfortable executing people for any number of religious crimes that they deem to be against the word of God. Women are put to death for being raped. They allow people to be stoned to death. Christian-controlled nations were responsible for the Dark Ages, Crusades, and many other atrocities. Sometimes the King was a puppet of the Pope; sometimes the Pope was a puppet of the King. Either way there wasn't a lot of free thinking allowed. The Jews control Israel--they believe that God gave them that land and they don't hesitate to kill anyone who gets in the way of that claim. Under Communism, atheism was required and religious people were executed by the state.
The real test of religious freedom (from our unbiased point of view) is how Realists are treated in society. A member of the Church of Reality has more freedom based on church doctrine than any other religion. One of our sacred principles is the Principle of Freedom. If Realists are allowed to be free then probably everyone else is as well. Our religion demands more freedom for the individual than any theist-based religion.
Some religions are against the separation of church and state because they either have control of the government or hope to have control of the government someday. This is very shortsighted because, for example, Christianity is not one religion, it's thousands of religions. Many Christian religions openly hate each other and would be extremely oppressive to other Christians if their group took over. Since Christians can't agree on what a "True Christian" is, what would happen if the government made that decision? When you think this through you can quickly see that a Christian nation would be a disaster - especially for Christians.
The separation of church and state protects the state from the church and the church from the state. It isn't anti-religion, it's pro religion. When government remains religiously neutral it allows an individual the freedom to choose, or to not choose, what religion they want to be. The Church of Reality strongly supports religious freedom and believes that religions should evolve on their own, without government intervention.
For far too long humanity has suffered as a result of war. We are locked in a cycle where cultures and religions and political groups have fought each other over the same issues for thousands of years with no change in the underlying causes that lead us into war. Are we going to continue to go to war for the next several thousand years? Will we be at war for eternity? At what point do we give it up? Is it our nature to need to be at war or is it something that we can evolve beyond? And if we are to eventually evolve beyond war, what will we have to do to achieve that?
The time has come to address this issue. Why sit back and wait thousands more years when we can start to solve the problem now? Just because no one has figured out how to stop war in the past doesn't mean that the problem can't be solved. If humanity is going to evolve forward then we need to stop wasting our resources on figuring out how to kill people and use them to figure out how to thrive. Humanity has the capability of choosing what our future will be and we in the Church of Reality choose that war will not be a part of the future of the human race.
To that end, we, this day, as the Church of Reality, declare that we are determined to find a solution to war and to come up with a plan to end war and to implement that plan. We, this day, choose to assume that the problem is solvable and we commit ourselves to the task of finding that solution. We are a religion that solves problems and to us the word "impossible"ť is just another word for "challenge".
The exploration of reality itself is a commitment to problem solving and since we are already in the problem solving business, then let us take on the big tasks and let us solve the great problems of humanity. We as Realists can contribute to the Tree of Knowledge a way to end war and therefore we commit ourselves this day to solving the problem and removing war from the human equation.
Where is the human race going? What will we be like 100 years from now? Or 1000 years from now? Or a billion years from now? Will we develop space ships and travel to other star systems or explore other galaxies? Will we run into intelligent life on other planets?
Will we cure diseases? Will we learn how to live forever? Will we control our own evolution through genetic engineering and cybernetic implants? What will computers be like? Will we be able to convert mass into energy efficiently?
What will society become? Will we have world peace? Will we have a one world government? What will justice be like? Will we ever evolve beyond the need for money? Will we lose our individuality and become one great mind or will will we become more individualistic as we free ourselves of the {ln:cult mind)? Will there be religion in the future and if so, what will it be like?
What will the future of history be like? Will we store enough information to allow future historians to look back at us and learn more about how they got to where they will be then? What do we want the future to be and will we be happy with the choices that we end up making?
There is a big difference between opposing bad drug law and dealing drugs for profit. The Church of Reality puts a high value on laws and justice. We understand the need for an orderly society. We also understand that sometimes it is necessary to break the law in order to serve a higher purpose. However, to profiteer off of bad law is not something that our religion supports.
Church of Reality policy on drugs isn't as logically consistent as most of our other policies and principles. That's because drug laws and the reality of drugs are so disconnected. Drugs that should be legal aren't and drugs that should be prohibited are legal. So it is logically inconsistent for us to support the use of some illegal drugs while prohibiting the dealing of drugs. It is also inconsistent to support the obeying of laws and supporting the breaking of laws at the same time. As a reality based religion these inconsistencies are naturally troubling to us.
So if we conditionally support the use of illegal drugs then do we not have to get them from drug dealers who we don't support? The short answer is in some cases yes. So therefor the right thing to do is to get what we need while keeping our interaction with drug traffickers to a minimum and taking into account the harm it does to society to fuel an illegal drug trade even in a drug that should be legal. Thus a person buying a pound of pot at no profit for 16 friends is not the same as someone importing a ton of pot to sell to total strangers.
Similarly the profiteering off of legal drugs that should be illegal is also immoral. There is no difference morally between a tobacco farmer and a cocaine farmer. Both are producing a highly addictive drug that is harmful to society for profit. Marketing addictive drugs to children whether the drugs are legal or not is just plain wrong. Alcohol, for example, is a legal drug that when used properly is both enjoyable and has a positive effect. While at the same time when used improperly is highly addictive and devastating. Giving a child a little wine as part of a religious ceremony or even with a family dinner is perfectly natural. Giving a child hard liquor so they can get drunk is irresponsible. Marketing an alcohol product that is secretly targeted at minors is immoral.
The Sacred Principle of Curiosity is the wanting to know everything. The Principle of Exploration is the about actual exploration, curiosity is the desire to explore. It is the lust for knowledge. It is the need to know everything. Why is it? How does it work? It is why we are Realist pursuing the understanding of understanding. It's because we want to know.
There are many ways that Church of Reality culture is like the culture of other religions and also many ways that we are different. We like to think that we have all the good stuff that other religions have, plus a few new traits, and reject all the bad stuff. That is at least where Realist culture should be and if we aren't what we should be, we then we should change.
For the most part we recognize that all religions share a desire for people to be "good people" and do what's right. In that respect we are like them. The difference being that we rely on logic and reason as opposed to faith and holy books to determine right from wrong. It is also part of our culture to think things through and to change and adapt. If we realize that we are wrong, we change our minds. If we are faced with a new situation, then we reason it out.
Where we tend to differ is that we are an includive, rather than an exclusive culture. Although most religions welcome anyone who converts, they have no respect for the nonbelievers. Our culture is that we are surrounded by people who believe differently than we do, but we don't condemn them, we include them, listening to their good ideas and sharing our good ideas with them.
Realists put science and logic first, so we value using our minds. Our values include being curious, the desire to learn, to explore, to want to understand everything. In other cultures that appreciate these values, they don't have the same level of importance that we place on them. In fact, many other religions look down on reality describing it as the "material world" and should be considered to be inferior to the "spiritual world". Our worldview is that the material world is all we have and we have to do the best with what we have to work with. We don't believe in a deity that will fix our mistakes and bail us out when we get into trouble. So we have a higher sense of responsibility and appreciation for the benefits and consequences of our actions. Instead of praying for something, we work hard to get it.
The Church of Reality sees the future as improving as a result of our commitment to the Principle of Positive Evolution. We see ourselves as the stewards of our planet. We look at this rock in space as our home and that hard work and good choices will result in a brighter future. Many other religions see the future in terms of the end of the world. Our view is that how you look at the future makes a difference in how you treat the present. We value the future. That's why we call the future the Sacred Direction.
Looking to the future also help us embrace change. We assume that a lot of what we believe is wrong or at least can be improved. Other religions look to the past where current events are interpreted against ancient texts that are essentially static. In our view evolution is something we can and should embrace and use to better ourselves.
We look at reality as "our world". Many religions focus on "the next world" and look down on the "material world". We feel that having a positive attitude towards this world is better than having a negative attitude towards this world.
We are a Monorealistic religion meaning we believe in one reality. There is only "this world". Other religions often believe in "other worlds" creating two sets of realities with one set bound by physical laws with the other being the realm of the supernatural where "miracles" occur. Our view is if someone real doesn't do it then it doesn't get done. This causes us to put more focus on personal responsibility.
Many religions put belief ahead of behavior. They refer to their holy books that can and are read in a way that say anything they want. In the Church of Reality we look at what you do. Our worldview is that what you do is what you believe. Although we are forgiving, we are not "forgiven". We don't blame our behavior on the influence of deities or demons that control us. We put value in accountability. We do what we do and when it's done we did it.
A famous Atheist - Michael Newdow - has again filed a lawsuit challenging the United States laws requiring money to have the phrase "In God we Trust" and the addition of "Under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954. A lot of people don't know this but the words "Under God" were added to the pledge to make a political statement during the Cold War. The intent was to state that the Communists were "godless Atheists" and that Americans were believers and it was intended to associate Communism with godless Atheism and that these were our nations enemies. So the intent of the addition of "Under God" in the Pledge was, in part, to get people to hate Atheists. Since we Realist are Atheists we see the Pledge as an attack on us. To get people to hate us.
"Under God" was added to the Pledge in 1954 to associate Communism with Atheism and get people to hate Atheists
If you must recite the Pledge then in place of "Under God" we say "One Nation, in Reality, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all."
The same is true to a lesser extent with "In God we Trust" on the money. It is a statement by the government that there are two classes of citizens, believers and Atheists, and the government is aligned with believers.
Ever since the beginning of America Christians have fought to declare America a "Christian Nation." The first 13 colonies however were different flavors of Christians. Some states required that you be Catholic to hold office while other states required that you be Protestant. In order to bring these different Christian factions together and incorporate the Jews, Muslims, and others, our founding fathers specifically excluded all religious tests, made all religions and non-religions equal in the eyes of the law, and created what is now called the separation of church and state.
This made America the great secular society it is today where all citizens live as equals. But our equality is still under attack as the Christians are still trying to change America from a secular nation to a Christian nation. We see the issues that Newdow is bringing as part of the attempt to cause America to evolve towards Christianity.
I am also granting Michael Newdow authority to argue our position to the court and I am ordaining him as a Beacon to speak in behalf of the church.
In support of this cause, the Church of Reality today is filing this letter with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. Our position is as follows:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco, CA 94119-3939
November 24th 2007
Re: Newdow, et al. v. Carey, et al.
Case Nos.: 05-17257, 05-17344, 06-15093
Church of Reality’s position regarding Coinage Policy and the Pledge
Dear Honorable Justices of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals,
I’m writing to you today in my capacity as First One of the Church of Reality. I hold the title First One as the founder of the church. Since it was my idea, I am the "first one" to think of it. Essentially I am the Pope of Reality.
The Church of Reality is a religion dedicated to the pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is. We are a monorealistic religion in that we believe in the one true reality than includes everything that is actually real. We evangelize reality and we believe that any time anyone says the word reality, the world gets a little smarter.
Realists are not Atheists in the traditional sense. Our would view is that we will believe in a god if it showed up in a form that is independently observable by any person whether they are a believer or not. However, for us to positively consider something as real, or even likely real, there has to be a scientific reason to constitute a basis for that belief. Since we are Realists and have made a commitment to reality, it is antithetical to our belief to be forced to be part of a collective, our nation, who speaks in our behalf stating that the Abrahamic God is real. Our nation is part of our personal identity and the government is stating who we are and what we believe in on our behalf and the message on the money and in the Pledge definitely do not represent us. As a result, we feel that Christians, Jews and Muslims are of a superior social status. Many Christians commonly assert that America is a Christian nation and that if we aren’t Christian we can just leave. The message on the money and in the Pledge are used, in our opinion, as a message that America recognizes itself as a Christian dominated nation. Thus we Realists have an interest in hearing what this court has to say. We want to know if the Establishment Clause is real or if it’s just ceremonial statements of religious equality that are not to be taken seriously.
Pursuant to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution, it is the duty of this court to ensure that and the decision of the court to be religiously neutral. The government is prohibited from favoring one religion over another. However, as a Realist, I also have to acknowledge that it is unlikely this court will make a decision ordering the removal of the phrase "In God we Trust" from United States money. The arguments that reference the issue of money also apply to the pledge.
NEWDOW IS CORRECT
Technically we agree with the position of Michael Newdow, that "In God we Trust" is a religious statement and prefers the deity of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Islam, and Christianity) over those of other religions and non-religions such as Atheism, Humanism, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. As a realist I find it troubling that the government would state, on behalf of all our citizens, that our nation trusts an invisible deity who has not appeared on this continent, except to the Mormons, and has no formal relationship to our government.
It is also our position that if the money didn’t already proclaim "In God we Trust" and that if Congress were proposing it now, that it would clearly be deemed unconstitutional. Just as it is clear that changing it to "In Jesus we Trust" would be deemed unconstitutional if that were proposed today. The only difference between God and Jesus is that God believers represent a somewhat larger set than Jesus believers and that a tradition has been established which will cause an uproar if it is disturbed. In fact, we see a pattern that Christians, who are actively trying to alter laws in their favor to undermine the establishment clause, have used as a tactic altering the money, altering the pledge, trying to sneak prayer into schools, and altering the definition of science to substitute religious dogma such as creationism and Intelligent Design. It is a historical fact that the alteration of the Pledge and the altering of the money was done explicitly for the purpose of trying to Christianize a nation founded on the secular principle that all religions are equal and that the government is prohibited by the Establishment clause from showing a religious preference.
The way we see it, the phrase "In God we Trust" is a short form of a much more profound statement. Since it is REQUIRED to be on ALL money and was put there by CONGRESS under LAW then it is a proclamation by the United States on behalf of all the people stating, "All of the People of the United States of America, and through it’s government under the power of law, does hereby declare and decree that WE as a nation acknowledge the existence and the significance of the God of Abraham of the Old Testament, (GOD), and to the EXCLUSION of all other deities and non-deities, and that we as a nation agree to worship ONLY this deity by declaring our TRUST without having established any official relationship with it through either contract or treaty."
In 1954 Congress altered the Pledge to include the words "Under God" at the height of the Cold War. The Soviet states were associated with Atheist and Congress wanted to distinguish Americans from the "godless Communists". Since members of the Church of Reality are also godless, the pledge reminds Americans that we Atheists are the enemies of America, just like the Communists. It is our position that the words "Under God" were added specifically to associate Atheism with Communism and generate hatred towards Atheists.
The Pledge of Allegiance is even more offensive to us. Where "In God we Trust" on money is a passive statement the Pledge contains "Under God" and is REQUIRED to be recited by Realist children who belong to a religion that does not believe in God. In our view it is the same as government controlled forced prayer. It is no different that making Christian Children say "Under Mohammed" in spite of their religious upbringing. As the founder of the Church of Reality I have decreed that our children WILL NOT SAY "UNDER GOD" and we will, if necessary defy any laws and any order of any courts that compel us to pay homage to a foreign deity that we do not accept.
REMEDY
In our religion it is our custom to figure out solutions to problems. In this case there is a requirement for neutrality and the reality that a phrase that is on its face a religious statement, stay on some money. One possible solution is that the Mint issue a variety of religious series coins covering a wide variety of religious concepts. This model allows for neutrality without the requirement of causing a religious uproar,
We recognize that a variety of concepts of deities have been part of history for thousands of years and historical events are often the theme of coinage. However the Abrahamic deity which includes Judaism, Christianity, and Islam does not represent the full spectrum of religious thought and our position is that there be a reasonable amount of representation of other religions that do not believe in this particular deity.
It is also a tradition in coinage to do a series of coins representing a concept. One such series is the 50 states on quarters series where every state gets their own state quarter representing who they are to the nation.
As to the Pledge, we find it unacceptable and we will not participate in this religious ritual. Our view is that God doesn’t exist and that factually no nation is under God. The United States does not have a formal relationship with any deities where the deity has signed a treaty to which we are bound. So even if God exists, there are no laws that indicate that we are under a deity. The money issue is possibly tolerable if amended. The Pledge is unacceptable.
WE WANT TO BE INCLUDED
We therefore ask this court to consider an order that will lead to the minting of coins that read, "In Reality we Trust". We believe that the Church of Reality represents an important religious concept that is actually bigger than God. In support of our position the Church of Reality states as follows:
To legally be a religion, the courts have consistently ruled that the religious belief be sincere. But what is the definition of "sincere"? We argue that one definition of sincere is that you believe that the precepts of your religion are real. That your holy books describe reality. It is our contention that any group that claimed to be a religion, but refused to state that their beliefs had some relationship to reality, would fail the "sincere" test.
Since the legal definition of all religions must include a relationship with reality we contend that reality is a more universal concept across all religions than God is. Not all religions believe in God. But all religions believe that whatever they believe is real.
Our definition of church membership transcends the concept of the individual. Our worldview is that we are all linked together as a great community of minds sharing the "Tree of Knowledge" which is the sum total of human understanding. Whenever a person thinks about reality they become "Real in the Sacred Moment" and during that period of time they become a member of the Church of Reality. And our religious culture includes what we call "Communion" which is whenever two or more people are discussing reality itself.
Because everyone in the world has thought about reality at some time in their lives then everyone in the world has been a Realist at some point in their lives. We also contend that every adult person on the planet has had a conversation with someone about reality and has therefore performed communion. Our religion includes, to some extent, every person on the planet. So we have the larger membership. We include everyone.
Because reality has existed since the beginning of time and that reality has played a role in every historical event, we contend that Reality has at least as much historical justification to be on a coin as God.
Our worldview is that reality plays and important part in every religion because without reality, no religion would exist.
When this court makes its important decisions, does it not take reality into account? We ask that this court honor our beliefs by taking reality into account when deciding this case.
It is our position that a reality coin would honor all other religions because to be on a coin next to a reality coin is a statement by other religions that they are comfortable with reality and that they are sincere in their beliefs. To exclude "In Reality we Trust" on the coins is the same as making a statement challenging their sincerity.
Similarly, if this court were to take the position that the phrase "In God we Trust" has no religious meaning it would be an insult to America’s monotheists, and act that would violate the Establishment Clause. Can a monotheistic religion claim that they are sincere believers in a nation where the courts have ruled that God is meaningless? If I were a theist, I would have to object to that, and I hereby do object in their behalf. This court can not say that God has no meaning.
Nor can this court say that reality has no meaning. We in the Church of Reality believe that we wouldn’t be here if not for reality. We believe that reality has touched all our lives at one time or another. We believe that every person has some kind of relationship with reality, and that if you take a person’s reality away from them, that they will cease to exist. We contend that if not for reality, God couldn’t possibly exist. How could God be real if there was no reality?
WHEREFORE the Church of Reality suggests to this honorable court that, if Newdow is denied the remedy he seeks, that this court orders that some money have the phrase "In Reality we Trust" in place of "In God we Trust". Or that some money not have any religious message. Or that some money depict scientific history such as the big bang that created the universe. It is our position that if a religious statement is allowed that it can’t be EXCLUSIVE of religious statements.
Our compromise position is that although money may be deemed by this court to be allowed, ALLOWED to have "In God we Trust," that it would violate the Establishment Clause to REQUIRE that one form of religious art or one religion’s deity be preferred over that of another, or of that of no deity. In the eyes of the law all religions must be equal.
As to the Pledge, we in the Church of Reality will not accept any ruling that our children be required to say the words "under God" and that if this court upholds this requirement, then we will defy it. The government can not REQUIRE religious speech from those who find such speech personally offensive.
If you are convinced that Realism is going to be your Life Story then the next step is to experience the AH-HA Moment and Accept the Truth. It's what you tell yourself "I'm doing it! Reality as it really is! No more Bullshit. I'm going to give up Living the Lie." You may not know what reality is and you may not know how to determine what's real, and you may have a lot of beliefs that you aren't sure about, but you have accepted Reality as your standard. You are no longer afraid to ask the Sacred Question, "What is Real?" It means that to just believe for the sake of believing is no longer good enough. It means that Reality matters. It means that you are putting Reality First. It means that you will no longer Worship a False Truth.
Unlike many religions the Church of Reality focuses on this world. Other religions often focus on some "next world" that doesn't exist at the expense of our real reality in this world that does actually exist.
In simple terms everything has one of two states. It is either real or it is not real. Something either exists or it does not exist. We currently exist. We are a part of reality. We have evolved to the point where we can begin to comprehend what it means to exist, what reality is. If we want to continue to do that then we have to continue to exist.
If however we become extinct then all is lost. Everything that everyone ever did will become forgotten. We can imagine that maybe a billion years from now that some other life form evolves and finds our ruins and utilizes our technology, but realistically when we are gone, were gone. We go back to being the lifeless dust that we evolved from. If we had meaning it is gone. Extinction is the end of everything for us.
We might be the only life in the universe that has evolved to understand that the universe exists. We might be all there is. We simply do not know.
We do not know if advanced life exists on other planets. From what we know there is a very high likelihood that microbial life is common in the universe. But what about live that has evolved to the point of comprehending reality itself? Are there others out there? We simply do not know. The universe might be teaming with advanced life and there might be civilizations that are so advanced that we can't even comprehend them. On the other hand we might be alone. We might be the only place in the universe where life evolved. We simply do not know.
What if we are alone? What if we are it? What would it mean if we were the only life form in the universe that has evolved to this point? What if we are the sole species through which the universe contemplates its own existence. If we become extinct then the universe would go back to being a dumb universe. Since we don't know if we are alone do we not have a responsibility to survive to find out what we potentially could become? Is that not our higher purpose?
What we do know is that advanced life requires billions of years of a somewhat stable environment. A 10 mile wide asteroid hit and we're gone. Primitive life like the cockroaches might survive but not humans. We actually have the technology now (or soon will have) to defend Earth from an asteroid hit. But if a nearby star goes supernova, we're back to space dust. We could have a super volcano erupt like the one that created Yellowstone Caldera could take out the human race.
In the long run we are going to have to be able to move to other planets because something is going to eventually happen to this planet to wipe it out. We are going to have to evolve forward so that we can travel the vast distances between stars and find new planets to colonize.
We also could wipe ourselves out from just being stupid. We have enough nuclear weapons to kill everyone on the planet. We can create a genetically engineered virus to wipe ourselves out. We could change our environment to the point where we can no longer survive in it. It is a fact that most species on our planet don't make it. We are here because all our ancestors all the way back to pond scum made the right choices or was just lucky enough to survive. But there is nothing that insures that will continue. Although it may be our fate to eventually become extinct, we can at least decide to not destroy ourselves.
We can also decide that our existence in this world is valuable to us and that we are going to, as a species, decide together to continue to evolve, learn to better survive, and cheat extinction for as long as we can.
When an individual dies, they die. The person as a consciousness ceases to continue. The self awareness and the experience of identity stop. The only thing left of us individually is our Life Story, the sum total of the events of your life and what DNA you leave behind.
A reality based view of the afterlife however is that we are all part of a single organism that started on this planet a billion years ago. All life is evolving together and we are part of that evolution. What we do in our brief existence matters and it has an affect on what we evolve into.
Our individual afterlife can be viewed in the impact that our role in life played to affect the future. We Own Ourselves and we can choose to be a positive force in the evolution of humanity, or we can choose worship a false reality and waste our existence. If we choose to live in Right Relationship with Reality then our individual accomplishments will live on and the meaningfulness of our existence will be remembered. If we choose to shun reality then reality will shun us and we will be forgotten.
Thus, in the Church of Reality the afterlife is the future. It is where our story goes to live after we die.
Just as a caterpillar turns into a butterfly humanity is about to go through a metamorphosis. We are about to become something very different that what we have been and the process has already begun. We are in a phase of accelerating evolution. Although it has been accelerating since the beginning of the industrial revolution it was the invention of the transistor that really started to change the world. And then the Internet was so significant that it was probably the single most factor in transforming society at the rate it is going today.
With the advances we are seeing in genetics, computerization, communication we are transforming who we are as a species. We are changing life on this planet. All life is changing. We are crossing genetics between tomato plants and moths, something that could never happen in the wild. But does this mean that what we create is "artificial"? I think it is natural, however it's a new kind of natural. It would be unnatural for change to stop.
We have to listen to hear what the universe wants us to become. We are the mechanism for the universe to be self aware.
We are at the transition point between old evolution and new evolution. Old evolution was based on random events and selection on success. We are transforming into and engineered evolution where we get to choose what we are going to evolve into. We can manipulate the genes. We can import genes from other species. We will soon be able to design genetics from scratch. Create a superior engineered human that we design. And then that superior human will create one that is even more superior. Humans with better technology, better machines, faster computers and a fusion of machine and biology. Maybe something wonderful, or something terrible.
Old evolution isn't going away. If we manage to cause our own extinction then we are back to old evolution. Maybe in another 500 million years the cockroaches will take over and get it right. Maybe nothing will evolve our technology and when the Sun expands and burns this planet to a crisp maybe some place else in the universe will get it right. Or maybe not. Maybe this is all there is and we are so rare that if we blow it - it's all gone. We just don't know, so we should respect what we are as if it is all there is.
Is personifying Reality by using the term God useful? What good does it do to tag Reality with the label God. Is the Church of Reality bowing to social pressure by including God references? Shouldn't Realists just reject the idea of God completely? If we reference God in the context of Reality won't religious people misinterpret it to say that scientists believe in God? Isn't using God and Reality together a form of scientific blasphemy? Can't we please just make God go away and move on to pure science?
These are all good questions. But there are arguments to be made that applying the word God to Reality is useful. Since this is about labeling and definitions of words ultimately it is subjective. So there isn't a right or wrong answer on this one. It's more of a way to explore and understand existential concepts. So let's look at the other side - why defining God as a personification of Reality is useful.
Reality fills God's empty chair.
One of the problems with God is that God has been the ultimate empty chair. I remember as a boy I had to go through the Passover Seder where we would fill Elijah's cup with wine. Elijah was sort of like Santa, an invisible guy who would come around to all the Jewish households to drink a little from each cup. At least that's the way I understood it as a kid. But Elijah never came and I closely monitored the level of the cup to see if the level ever changed, and it didn't. One Seder I drank Elijah's cup. My father got angry. "What happened to the wine?", he asked. "Elijah came and drank it!" (Now who isn't the believer?)
God and Elijah have the same problem. They are both an empty seat inviting all sorts of fictional ideas to be treated as real. There's even the expectation that "someone is sitting in the empty chair and it is called God." You are supposed to imaging that you see someone in the empty chair and then we can all believe God is there sitting in the empty chair.
The problem with the empty chair is that there are all these religions who are making up gods to sit in the empty chair. God of the Jews gave them Israel and they take great offense to anyone who even questions their right to real estate the the guy in the empty chair gave them. Christians believe that they have an updated God as defined by the New Testament that makes them successors to the Jews, and anyone who doesn't believe what they believe will burn in Hell forever. Islam also has exclusivity to the empty chair claiming that if you aren't a Muslim then you are an Infidel and you deserve to be killed. And in many parts of the world it is acceptable to murder Infidels.
The empty chair is dangerous because it creates an expectation that God is sitting there and invites invites people to take this seriously and make this their central premise for relating to Reality. The empty chair is a false god. Reality is the most mighty God. Reality it tougher that Jehovah, Yahweh, or Allah because Reality is real and the rest of them are not real.
As we can see the only true God candidate is Reality, and we have also seen that all religions claim to pursue the Truth. The definition of Truth is Reality. So if we put Reality in the empty God chair then the chair is no longer empty. Reality displaces and replaces all other Gods and becomes the One True God.
Reality as God displaces mythical gods.
They say that you can't prove God doesn't exist because you can't prove a negative. But actually you can. By showing as we do here that the only God candidate is Reality itself, and by putting Reality on the God chair, it disproves all other gods. Maybe the best way to prove God doesn't exists is to prove God does exist - but the God that exists isn't the one from the Bible stories, but the one that is backed up by science. By elevating Reality to the title God it pushes all the other gods out of the way.
If we personify evolution as Darwin, then what does Darwin want us to do?
Personification is also useful in helping the human brain understand complex ideas. For example, let's personify evolution and call it Darwin. Darwin will be the personification of the process of evolution. So we can then ask the question, "What does Darwin want us to do?"
Since evolution is a process that selects on what survives the Darwin wants us to survive. Darwin wants us to succeed. Darwin doesn't want us to fail because then Darwin has to start over. If we do what Darwin wants we will continue to evolve and thrive. If we don't then we will go extinct.
So what is Darwin telling us? If we look at the historical record we can see that the dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid. Why did they go extinct? Because they failed to develop a space program. The lesson we can learn from this is that Darwin wants us to fund NASA. If we don't fund NASA then the next big asteroid will wipe us out too. But if we do what Darwin wants then we'll see it coming and we'll be able to push it out of the way. Darwin wants us to limit our population. Darwin wants us to stop poisoning our environment. Darwin wants us to migrate into Space.
Darwin wants us to live in Right Relationship with Reality. In order to live in harmony with Reality we have to study Reality, We have to know Reality. Or - if we personify Reality as God then Darwin wants us to know God.
When Reality is the new God, Science is the new Bible. Evidence is Scripture.
Personification is useful in that it creates an upgrade path for the old Bible Story version of God to the science based modern version of God where God is really Reality. One doesn't convert to Realism, it's more of an upgrade to the latest version. Reality is essentially God 2.0. Science is the new Bible. Evidence is the new scripture.
One can make the argument that why should you worship an old dead God who hasn't been seen in thousands of years when you can have a relationship with the new God (Reality) which is very much alive and still speaking to us through evidence.
People think of evolution as something that happens in the world of matter. we live in a universe where stars evolve into astronomers. Evolution has traditionally applied to biological organisms but software evolves too. In fact - software is evolving faster than anything on this planet has ever evolved.
Consider what Reality does rather than what it is.
Let's consider a non-traditional view of the universe. Sometime when someone looks at Reality from a different perspective one can see properties not noticed from a traditional point of view. We usually look at the universe from the perspective of stuff. The universe is matter, energy, galaxies, stars, planets, asteroids, rocks, and little green men from other planets. But instead of looking at the universe as stuff, let's look at it from the perspective of function, Not what the universe is, but what the universe does.
We live in a mathematical universe. When we understand anything about the universe we find an equation that describes how it functions. And even if we don't yet have an equation for the stuff we don't yet understand, we expect there will be an equation when we figure it out. And eventually if the core nature of Reality were known we would expect that there's probably some root equation that Reality itself emerges from - an equation for existence.
A simulated Reality and a real Reality would likely be indistinguishable.
Some people even say that perhaps our Reality is a simulation. That our universe might be an instance of an app on someone's cell phone somewhere. And if the phone is rebooted our universe goes away. A simulated universe would also likely be a completely mathematical universe as well, and the fact that the universe has a finite age, finite size, and a finite resolution (quantum mechanics) is the type of thing one might expect in a simulation. Are we made of stuff or are we made of dots? Atoms are dots, held together by electromagnetic force fields. There's a lot of material for those who think we're in a simulation.
It probably doesn't matter if we are in some base Reality or in a simulation and we might never know. Even if this is a simulation it's Reality from our perspective. If this is base Reality the base reality is still an equation. Somehow Reality arises out of the mathematics. And ir is the execution of the equation over time that is our universe. Thus the universe itself can be thought of as software.
Biological Software
Traditionally software is thought of as code that humans write to run on a computer. Software is the instruction sequence that tells the computer to do A then do B the if a condition is met do C. Computers and software allow us to create a mirror of the processes we invent and run them far faster and more accurately than humans can. Computers and software allow us to extend the functionality of our minds.
But there are other kinds of software than our silicon based computers. For example, DNA is biological code that has the instructions to turn a single cell into you. And it's code that was written by evolution. 3.5 billion years ago chemicals in the ocean started reproducing and evolving. As time went on the fitness function (survivability) caused random mutations to evolve into an improved algorithm. What a new function made the organism more resilient that function became a permanent part of the DNA coding. Thus the software essentially wrote itself following the rules of the universe.
Software as a Life Form
What is life. When it comes to biological life we have a pretty good idea. When you get down to simple viruses it gets a little questionable around the edges. But we tend to think of life as biological. But what if we were to consider non-biological life? Suppose we expanded the definition of life beyond chemistry. What would be a useful definition and examples of things that exhibit life like properties?
For example - is fire life? It reproduces. It can reproduce. In the right environment it is self sustaining. In some causes it even seems to adapt. So it has properties that life shares. It doesn't evolve however. Not that fire is actually life, but as a thought experiment it is interesting to contemplate the possibility.
But what about software as life? Like fire, it reproduces. But it also evolves. Of course software running on computers is completely dependent on us. We create its habitat, cyberspace. We control it's evolution. But it is also involved in its own evolution. As me make software better we use that software as a tool to make even better software. We also use software to design better computers and computer networks for software to run on. Ans humans are evolving our meat based software to be more interdependent with the software world. Our relationship with software is symbiosis.
The Software creates the Hardware.
Now - taking this concept to the next level, as we learned earlier, DNA is biological software. So we are software writing software. The very equations of the universe which give rise to the laws of physics and cause the universe it iterate over time is much like a program running. The universe can be seen as a recursive algorithm that started running at the Big Bang and continues to run now.
So if you look at the universe mot as stuff but as function the it seems that the function created the stuff, and not the other way around. That the universe due to the laws of physics is taking every moment of time and executing the laws of the universe against that instant to create the next sequential instant in time. The universe itself can be looked at as a program running and that it's the software that preceded the hardware.
The History of the Evolution of software.
The universe started out far simpler than it is today and as it evolved there were new emergent properties that led to higher complexity. First the 4 forces emerged, the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, electromagnetism, and gravity. Energy condensed into simple matter. Matter became an emergent property of the universe as it interacted with the Higgs Field and started to experience time and gravity. Gravity led to the formation of stars and stars formed galaxies. Stars fused hydrogen and helium into heavier elements and eventually exploded in novas which scattered heavier elements into the universe.
These heavier elements had many new chemical properties and formed planets around next generation stars. Our planet and Sun is an example of this. The software of the universe makes more complex hardware and that hardware makes more complex software. When the universe evolved for about 10 billion years those chemical processes led to the formation of life. Life was a significant emergent property.
Live evolved and became more complex as it u=is guided by the rules of evolution. Life evolved minds, a biological computer that became self aware. We are now able to contemplate and reason and understand the universe we live in. Awareness, agency, free will, curiosity, all of there are emergent properties of the universe.
And although we evolved a neocortex for higher reasoning it's not our hardware that's responsible for our understanding of the universe. A single mind can not accomplish that task. It was the emergence of language that led to these new abilities. If a single individual discovered a new truth of reality, that information can now be shared an passed on. Our ability to communicate increased with written language and that evolved into radio, television, and the internet. We became a networked species and we evolved to star and store knowledge in what we call the Tree of Knowledge. I don't know that the universe is 13.8 billion years old. We know it collectively.
What is the different between someone who is into science and someone who practices Realism? There is a lot of difference. There are a lot of people who will state, "Of course I believe in reality, who doesn't?" But - does that make them a member of the Church? No - it doesn't.
To be a Realist and practice Realism requires a greater commitment than just acknowledging that reality is real. The Church of Reality isn't just about what you believe in - it's what you do. Realism goes beyond just giving lip service to reality. To be a Realist you have to dedicate yourself to the cause of promoting Realism, publicly identify yourself as a Realist, and actively participate in growing the Tree of Knowledge. This church isn't about what you believe - it's about what you do.
Realists - and I use a capital R to indicate I use the term referring to church members - are expected to practice the disciplines of the church - which include growing the Tree of Knowledge. This involves such things as original thinking and communicating new good original ideas. It involves promoting the good ideas of others. It involves education, learning, communications, asking the Sacred Question, challenging beliefs on the basis of reality, insisting that decisions be made in a realistic way, contributing to the promotion of Realism, strengthening society through public service, charity, giving, sharing, and taking care of one another. A Realist is expected to be actively Realistic - not passively.
We choose to work to grow the Tree of Knowledge and we choose to work to cause humanity to evolve in a positive direction for a better tomorrow. It is these choices that make the Church of Reality a Religion.
The Tree of Knowledge is the central concept in the Church of Reality. The Tree of Knowledge represents the sum total of all human understanding. We are all members of the human race and we are all bound together as one being through the Tree of Knowledge. It is central to our belief that we acknowledge the reality that we are not - for the most part - separate individuals, in that our lives, our thoughts, our language, what we know, what we do, who we are, are all bound together in a vast matrix of information. And as Realists practicing Realism it is our duty to the Tree of Knowledge to improve ourselves individually, and as members of the human race for the good of all mankind.
The Church of Reality makes the assumptions that if life has a purpose - it is because we give it purpose. That we as a race have made the arbitrary decision to both survive and to prosper. That we choose to become better than we are today. That we should move forward into a better tomorrow. These choices do not come from reality itself. As far as the universe is concerned, we are just a rock in space.
But - the Church of Reality believes - through the Tree of Knowledge, that humanity as a race has made a choice to evolve in a positive direction. We as individuals and as church members stand for the principle that we want a better tomorrow; and that we want to know the truth. That we want to have a better understanding of who we are, why we are here, and why there is something rather than nothing. And it is our Dharma as Realists practicing Realism to ensure that humanity goes in that direction - forward - known to us as the Sacred Direction. It is this choice that we make that establishes the doctrine of the church.
To that end it is our discipline, our dharma, to make it our purpose, and to actively work to achieve the goals of the church. And in order to achieve this end - we create the Sacred Principles that form a practical foundation to achieve this purpose.
One of the greatest strength and weaknesses of the human race is the ability to rely on others to store information for us. Our brains can not hold everything we need to know to survive individually and we rely on others to figure things out for us. When we drive our cars on the streets we trust that the people who do the traffic lights have it figured out and we stop for red lights and go for green lights. Because of this trust and reliance on others, the human race has developed far beyond other life forms on this planet. But - there is a down side to this interdependence. What if the information we rely upon is wrong? What if people take advantage of us by making us rely on wrong information? How do we know if the common knowledge is real or fiction?
What makes people believe in things that are irrational? What flaws does the human brain have that can be exploited and how do you protect yourself and your family from being exploited? How does brainwashing work and how can you tell if you are the one brainwashed? How do I know that my religion, political party, or my country isn't a cult? How do I know if I'm being exploited? How can I determine if something is true or a lie?
Mental manipulation is common. It's rather easy to create a religious experience and make people believe that God is talking to their heart and that they should start forking over vast quantities of money in order to save their eternal soul from the fiery pits of Hell. In order to pursue reality the way it really is we should understand how people obscure reality and manipulate people and trick them. By understanding these tricks and educating others we can free people to explore reality the way it really is. It is therefore important that understanding of cults become a Church of Reality project so that we can prevent the cults from further taking control of the world.
Being omnipotent has it's limitations. God, for example, can't do anything wrong. "But", you would say, "God wouldn't want to do anything wrong." Yep - another limitation. I can want to do something wrong - God can't. God will never know what it truly feels like to personally commit a sin. I remember watching George Carlin with his trick questions for Catholic priests like, "Can God create a rock so big that he himself can't lift it?" Yes - this is all funny - but there really are some serious limitations to being omnipotent.
The Bible says God knows the future. So - if God knows the future, do we have free will? I mean - since God already knows what we are going to do - then we really don't have any choice. We seem to have a choice because we don't know what we are going to do. But - if God knows the future then reality is like a movie that's already been written and it's like we are watching the movie for the first time - so we don't know what's going to happen - but God has already seen the movie and he knows what's going to happen - and that's it. The movie can't change.
What this means is - there really is no such thing as "free will". Free Will implies that we have a choice and that we can do A or we can do B but if God already knows we are going to do A then we are going to do A. We can't chose to do B because if we chose B then God would have been wrong about knowing we were going to choose A, and God can't be wrong. Thus there really is no real choice.
Everything that Satan does is 100% in accordance with God's will and Satan is doing God's work.
In the beginning God created everything and had total knowledge of everything that was going to happen. God, for example, had to have known that the Devil was going to become evil (how could God not have known if he can see the future) and God created him anyhow. One has to assume that God did so because he wanted to create an evil Devil and that God knowingly and deliberately created Satan and that everything that Satan has done is 100% in accordance with God's plan. One has to assume that or else God doesn't know everything and if God doesn't know everything - the Bible is wrong - and God himself is wrong.
If God can see his own future - then God has no free will..
And - since God can see into the future - then God must know his own future - and therefore God has no free will either. Since God already knows what he's going to do - he can't change his mind, can he? I mean - if God changed his mind then God would be wrong. How could he not know that he was going to change his mind? So praying to God for God to do something has no effect because in praying to God to do something - you are lobbying God to make a different decision or influencing him to decide something differently than what he has already foreseen he is going to do. In praying you are wasting your time because God already knew what he was going to do long before you were born and that is the only thing he's going to do. God can not change his mind. God is totally bound by his own laws and has absolutely no free will to change anything in even the slightest way.
Being able to see into "the future" is the most limiting power of all because once you can see the future then you can see your own future and you no longer have the illusion of choice. You become infinitely powerless by becoming infinitely powerful. Imagine if you will God looking into the future and seeing himself remembering the moment that he looked into the future seeing himself remembering the past. Kind of like a tunnel of mirrors, enough to even give God a headache. (Whoops - another limitation - God can't get headaches!) Of course - this assumes God is subject to time (entropy) and if he is not - if God exists in all time simultaneously, then God is as stagnant as a lump of concrete and has no power to change anything at all. hmmmmm .... maybe God depends on John Ashcroft and the Reverend Sun Myung Moon to do his work for him?
There is a very complex issue as to how much we, as a society, should spend in order to prolong life. Some might say that society should spend an unlimited about of money to save a person's life. However, if those same resources were used to pay for medicine for the elderly poor, then more lives could be saved. These issues need to be addressed with wisdom and a sense of social justice. I have a real problem with the fact that society wastes vast amounts of resources in a hopeless battle to keep some people alive when others are allowed to starve to death in economically depressed areas, where it would only take a small amount of resources to sustain them. I also have a problem with the idea that an insurance company should determine the point when death occurs, or that death occurs when the money runs out.
Since Christians are right, and everyone else is wrong, Christians are mandated to expand their cult to try to include everyone in the world. They want Christian controlled governments to enforce their Christian way of life on the masses, and to have the authority to punish the non-believers. The idea of personal rights and liberties is contrary to surrendering your life and free will to Jesus and doing "his work" as dictated by the church. After all, if you're not serving Christ, you're serving Satan, and you are the tool of the Devil and serving an evil purpose. So the idea of personal liberty and free thinking is the same as giving rights to Satan to be evil. Something God would never approve of but seems powerless to stop. The omnipotent creator seems to have to rely on us mere mortals to do his work for him, and we, according to Christianity, have that task of winning souls over to Christ. So it's ok to repress the heathen non-believers because we heathens are the enemy of God. Obviously, Satan is working through me right now making me write this, and you're being influenced by Satan in reading it. Pray that you don't believe a word I say!
Christianity has no respect for any other religion, including other flavors of Christians.
So because of this Christians have a (not so) secret agenda to control the world. They come beating on your doors because you are "possessed by the Devil," and they have a holy duty to "convert you to Jesus" so that you and your family won't burn in Hell forever. Not all religions are evangelical. Jews don't come around beating your door asking "do you know Moses?" In fact, the Jews don't want you to convert and make you study and pass tests if you really want to join. Most Christians who convert to Judaism are doing it out of some weird twisted form of Christian craziness because they want to convert Jews or assimilate Jews as a form of Christianity. Christians seem to be obsessed with Jews and Jews would rather be left alone, as would every other noncritical religious group.
At present the Church of Reality doctrine is written by Marc Perkel with the approval of the High Council of Realists, and with input and suggestions from anyone who has good ideas to contribute or provides inspiration. At present the Church is in the very initial stages of creation and the present structure must change and will change in the future.
The Church of Reality can be compared to an open source GPL software development project. Software projects usually start with one person who gets an idea for something and goes off and starts developing it. Sometimes he shares his code, or at least his ideas, with his friends, but he does the development by himself to start with. Eventually he starts releasing his work to the world that downloads it and runs it. If the program is a good program and people find it useful, they will start giving the author feedback telling him what's not working, what needs to be added, requesting better documentation, and spreading the word about this great new program.
As time goes on a community develops around the author of the program and the author is overwhelmed by the growth in usage of his software. The first thing he does is create some kind of online support forum, a discussion mailing list, or a bulletin board. This allows users to communicate with each other and support each other freeing the developer of the burden of support. But if the software is really successful, it gets to a point where a single person can no longer keep up with the development demands.
At this point you have other skilled programmers writing add-on software to make the software better. This might be done independently or through an application interface that the developer creates to support plug in modules. The developer might open up the code base in a way that allows many other developers to work on different parts of the software. If the developer is successful in integrating other developers and / or allowing plugin development, then a good community forms around the software project and eventually there may be millions of people who are involved with the software.
The Church of Reality can be compared to an open source software project. At least - that is the official plan for how this church is to grow. This is a GPL project in the early stages of development. We still haven't got to version 1.0 yet and the initial code of the religion is still being written. So even though the church doctrine has only one developer and one maintainer now, it is not the way it will stay in the future. For the church to evolve into what it is designed to become, it must grow beyond the limitations of Marc Perkel as sole developer.
Many large tomes have been entirely devoted to supporting the point that great sections, if not all, of the New Testament, as well as the Old Testament, are simply a retelling of fabulous tales based on older Jewish, Roman, Greek, Persian, and even more ancient Egyptian stories. Substantiating this point does not advance this paper’s major thesis, except as it applies to the only supposed biblical “evidence” in support of a historic Jesus—that is, that testimony provided by the four gospels. For those readers who might be interested in the spurious origins of not only the gospels, but also the entire bible, the names of several entire books devoted to this subject can be found in the bibliography of this paper.
It is interesting to me that a great many freethinkers and rationalists—people who might be reading this article—are very quick to agree that pretty much the entire bible is chock full of misinformation, forgeries, bad history and just plain lies. Not only that, but most rationalists are quite willing to accept the proposition that this mish-mash of prevarication was not simply a naive passing along of old legends, but were written for the express purpose of convincing (i.e. “converting”) the gullible reader into subscribing to the particular fanciful dogma the ancient writers were trying to peddle. However, for some reason or another that entirely escapes me—perhaps just early brainwashing imbedded as deeply as potty training—these same rationalists are reluctant to imagine that the four gospels are completely fictional. Surely, they say, there must have been some sort of demythologized, even perhaps anonymous nobody who was arrested, tried by Roman authorities, then crucified. We can’t be sure of any more details than that, they say. I simply ask, why must this be so? What more tangible evidence can anyone present that the whole story is not simply what it appears to be—a retelling of one or more of the dozens, perhaps hundreds, of ancient sun-god or sky-god’s traditional, descending then ascending god myths, generally consisting of elements such as of first some tribulations (a trial), conviction, crucifixion, and finally resurrection? One could go on for several paragraphs pointing out the many details of the “passion story” that have parallels not only in more ancient myths, but also in earlier Jewish writings including the Old Testament. See, for example, Zechariah 9: 9, which foreshadows Jesus’ triumphal entrance into Jerusalem on an ass; actually “on an ass and the foal of an ass”—a neat trick, eh?), and the foreshadowing of the whole “passion story” in Psalms 22, the virgin birth in Isaiah 7: 14, his birth in Bethlehem in Micah 5: 2. All of this has been well noted for centuries. Why in the world would any rational person imagine that any of these fables were in any sense true?
It is interesting to speculate on the source material for the first written gospel, the Gospel according to Mark. Perhaps Mark—probably a well educated Greek-speaking member of the Jewish Diaspora—had read the works of “Philo Judaeus, the Jewish philosopher-theologian of Alexandria in Egypt.” (A speculation of Alvar Ellegard, Jesus One Hundred Years Before Christ, p. 5) Or, perhaps he had heard the stories of the so-called “Teacher of Righteousness” of the Essenes who may have lived (mythological or real—who knows?) sometime in the first century BCE. (Ellegard, op. cit., p. 258). Maybe Mark wrote in the second century as scholar Ellegard holds, and had read Flavius Philostratus’s Life of Apollonius, whose life almost exactly paralleled the life of the mythical Jesus and who reportedly died in 98 CE. (See Randel Helms, Gospel Fictions, p. 9) Surely, he had read of the so-called “Suffering Servant of the Lord” described in Isaiah 52: 13 53: 12. (See Doherty's The Jesus Puzzle, p. 80). Certainly Mark, and later the other gospel writers, had no shortage of inspiration. What they didn’t have is anyone who was in any sense “real.”
It is important to remain focused on the primary reason why these gospels were written, or perhaps “compiled” would be a better word. They were written for the express purpose of convincing the uneducated and gullible masses that they no longer needed to believe in a sort of mystical, unseen, spiritual Christ—a somewhat difficult concept for the unsophisticated to grasp even though it was familiar to them as I will discuss later. Here, in the gospels, the new Jesus cult offers a “real”, flesh and blood incarnation of god to believe in. (In truth, there was a terrific argument early on between the Gnostic Christians and the main line, later to become the Catholic Christians as to this “flesh and blood” issue.) This savior figure spoke real words (i.e. the Sermon on the Mount, etc.), ate food, performed miracles, visited real places, and spoke to “multitudes.” He was truly crucified, not allegorically crucified in a heavenly realm. Remember “doubting Thomas”? He wanted to stick his fingers into Jesus’ wounds, just to be sure. (John 20: 26-27) I thought that was a "nice touch” for the last gospel fiction writer to add; don’t you? For those of you that might still be unconvinced of the absolute untrustworthiness of the gospels in particular, I offer just one more powerful quotation for your consideration:
“Nearly every thing written concerning the gospels to the year 325, and all the copies of the gospels themselves to the same period, are lost or destroyed. The truth is that very few early Christian texts exist because the autographs, or originals, were destroyed after the Council of Nicea and the “retouching” of 506 CE under Emperor Anastasius, which included “revision” of the Church fathers’ works—catastrophic acts that would be inconceivable if these ‘documents’ were truly the precious testaments of the very Apostles themselves regarding the ‘Lord and Savior,’ whose alleged advent was so significant that it sparked profound fanaticism and endless wars. Repeating what would seem to be utter blasphemy, in the 11th and 12th centuries the ‘infallible Word of God’ was ‘corrected’ again by a variety of church officials. In addition to these major ‘revisions’ have been many others, including copying and translation mistakes and deliberate mutilation and obfuscation of meaning.” (Acharya S, The Christ Conspiracy, p. 26). Still think the gospels are about real events? If so, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to talk to you about.
The Sacred Moral Question is, "Is this a Good Thing?" What does "good" mean? That too is involved in the Sacred Moral Question. Right and Wrong and morality and ethics are all relative to your basic assumptions and goals. We base our morality on reality and it is our duty to make sure that reality is taken into consideration when questions of right and wrong are decided. The commitment to Reality is a commitment to truth, honesty, wisdom, and responsibility. The Church of Reality is committed to getting the moral questions right.
Cults use ritual and repetition to instill their reprogramming on their members. Rituals are things that the group does together to voice support for the group and demonstrate their submission to the cult mind. It can take the form of group prayers, songs sung together, the saying of the Pledge of Allegiance, marching in unison, or other acts where the individual demonstrates submission to the group. These rituals help get the individua's mind into a more submissive state which is necessary when one is expected to believe the most bizarre things without question and without having any knowledge that one is being manipulated.
Ritual also creates a sense of community which is necessary for a person's well being. It makes the person feel on an emotional level, that they are part of a team, a great mission, and have a sense of family and belonging. This emotional connection is a religious experience and it creates a euphoric high that can be falsely interpreted as divinely inspired. Because of our evolution to function together as a group, our minds are hard wired to feel great joy by being interconnected to other people united for some great cause. This natural experience is exploited by cults to get people addicted and keep them locked in. What is an otherwise normal community connection is elevated to an experience of "God is touching your heart right now". But we know that God is not touching them right now or communicating with them, because the kinds of messages the group receives from God is generally something that is self-serving to the cult. There is always a human who lets the group know what it is that God is telling them because sometimes God just isn't able to get the message across like cult leaders can.
The human brain is based more on pattern matching than on logic.
Repletion is also heavily used by cults. The human mind is not a computer. It is an evolved biological organ that can do some logical processing. It is actually more based on pattern recognition than on logic, and that's something that cult leaders have learned (through pattern recognition) that works on people. Advertising and propaganda work the same way. There is the BIG LIE theory that if you tell a lie over and over again, that people will start to believe it. I've heard the big lie theory so many times that I am beginning to believe it; demonstrating that it does work.
The human brain has only so much capacity. Some people say we only use 1/10 of our brains, but I think those people should speak for themselves. Personally my brain is so full that in order for me to learn something new, I have to forget something to make room for it. If we do have vast memory storage, we certainly don't have equal access to that storage and the part of our minds that we have the most access to are the parts that we think about the most. Cult leaders exploit that by using repetition so that their message is always in the top of the mind. Their message then interconnects with the rest of the individual's life experiences and connects itself deep into the individual's sel- identity. It is like a poisoning of the mind where belief becomes dominant and rational thinking atrophies. The mind loses it's ability to reason and reprograms itself to parrot the message of the cult. The cult becomes like a virus that consumes the individual and the person becomes a sock puppet.
In the Church of Reality we believe that we are what we think. It is what our mind does and what we dwell on that makes us who we are. Our mental processes, our thoughts, are the way we experience reality. The sum total of all the thoughts in our life represents our life experience. If we become a sock puppet, then we are surrendering our life experience to someone else. We are being cheated out of what little existence we have. Time is something that is precious to us. We live to be real in the sacred moment.
As Realists, we do not use repetition to convince people to believe false information on faith. Our message, or perhaps ritual, is to spend time dwelling on reality. Thinking about reality and coming up with new ideas is healing to the mind. It pushes out the dogma and reprograms the brain to think in a healthy way. We want people to spend their mental time wondering about things, questioning things to test if they are real. And that is the distinction between reality based religion and blind faith religion. Cults prohibit questioning, thinking, doubt, and scrutiny. They are not intellectually accountable. Their belief systems fall apart when subjected to reason. In contrast, our beliefs are subject to doubt and scrutiny. If what we believe in falls apart, we learn from that and fix our mistakes. And if it doesn't fall apart, then we can have an earned faith in what we believe in because our truth is purified by accountability.
Perhaps the hidden agenda of the Church of Reality is world domination? Are we going to enslave the world and force everyone to accept reality at gunpoint? Not hardly. However it is our belief that as the human race evolves forward towards a better tomorrow that it will become more realistic and that humanity will embrace reality as it really is. Does that mean the end of fiction based religions? We don't know. Perhaps fiction based religion will just have a better fiction that is more reality compatible.
But - yes - we dream of a world where reality rules. Busted!!!
In evaluating the justification of participating in a war or refusing to participate in a war, one must look at the conduct of the nation and the army of that nation to determine if the cause is worthy of participation. The Church of Reality has some guidelines to help determine if your country has the proper moral standing in the conflict.
Wars have at least two sides and it can be assumed that realists will be citizens of all countries involved. The Church of Reality considers blind faith in one's nation to be a bad thing because it will lead to Realists fighting against Realists. In theory if Realists think things through and use the Sacred Principles as guidance, then most realists of all countries should agree in the right path of action. A Realist's first duty is to the Church of Reality in its quest to promote the Sacred Principles. If a Realist is a citizen of a criminal nation, it is the duty of the Realist to act against the criminal causes of their own government.
Here are some principles that a Realist should consider when evaluation one's country's conduct and to determine if war is justified:
Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing, Religious Wars - The Church of Reality declares that these wars are intrinsically wrong. Slaughtering people because of their beliefs or ethnic or genetic heritage is morally wrong. Such wars are automatically considered to be unjust and offensive to our belief system.
War Crimes - Although war is in part about killing lots of people, not all killing in war is equal and justified. The Church of Reality recognizes the Geneva Convention as a basis for international wartime law. If your nation questions if this law applies to them or if it applies to the treatment of a specific enemy, then it is a strong indicator that their cause is unjust. Even if your nation approves it as legal according to their own laws, a Realist is required to think things through from a higher perspective and act according to the moral constructs of the Sacred Principles.
Use of Banned Weapons - Realists should consider the nation's cause unjust if the nation uses internationally banned weapons or weapons that one can reasonably conclude should be banned weapons. Use of chemical, biological, incendiary, nuclear, fuel bombs, microwave, or other hideous weapons against civilian populations, makes the cause unjust. We are Realists and we do not do these sort of things.
Torture - Torture is prohibited. You shall not engage in torture or support any military force or nation that practices torture. This includes the practice of shipping people to other nations where torture is practiced. One doesn't have to prove whether or not the nation is shipping people to other countries to be tortured. If torture is practiced or that it is commonly believed torture is practiced, then the Realists should assume torture is occurring and responds as if it were so. The practice of torture is barbaric and is automatically considered to be without justification.
Nations that have laws permitting torture or exceptions that allow torture under some circumstances such as intelligence agencies or officers, or who's laws provide immunity to torturers, or who fail to prosecute those who torture, or are otherwise known to allow torture to occur, is a nation that accepts torture. A Realist shall not further the cause of a nation that does not actively prohibit all forms of torture under all circumstances.
Unprovoked Aggressor - In the rare cases that a war it justified, it would be to defend against an aggressor. One should never be the aggressor. A war is unjust if it appears that one's nation started the war for questionable reasons such as religion, ethnic cleansing, to take land, for oil, mineral, or other resources, or for political gain. Being on the side that started the war raises the level of scrutiny as to the war's justification. Likewise if you are a citizen of the nation that is invade, the level of scrutiny is lowered.
Terrorism - Nations that commit terrorism or that sponsor terrorists who target civilian, are immoral and unjust.
Imprisonment Without Trial - Nations that allow people to be imprisoned without trial or due process rights, and where individuals can be held merely by being accused of a crime, are inherently unjust. If your country ignores it's own laws or doesn't have habeas corpus laws that protect all individuals in custody, then it is very likely that the cause for war is unjust. Holding people in prison without being charged with a crime or due process of law is immoral.
Secret Prisons - A nation that has a network of secret prisons or that ships people off to other nations where they are held in secret, are nations with suspect cause. Secret prisons are morally wrong.
Rape - Nations that allow rape either explicitly or through silently allowing it to occur as part of punishment or interrogation, are immoral and unjust. This is especially true of nations that order women raped as punishment for crimes.
Public Executions - Nations that execute people in public are immoral and unjust nations.
Death Penalty - Nations that execute people for crimes other than the most serious of murders are immoral and unjust, especially the execution of women for sexually related crimes.
Stoning / Cruelty - Nations that execute people by stoning or other means of cruel punishment are immoral and unjust.
Balsphemy - Nations that criminalize speaking out against religious beliefs are immoral and unjust.
Forced Patriotism / Political Repression - Nations that criminalize political speech or imprison people for failing to participate in patriotic symbolism are immoral and unjust.
Assassination - Nations that condone assassination, either of it's own people or leaders of other nations, are immoral and unjust. Possible exception in the case the majority of nations agree that a tyrant is to be taken out.
Nations are judged on what they do, not what they claim they are supposed to do. A nation might have progressive laws but routinely ignore the laws. In the Church of Reality it's not what you believe in, it's what you do. What a nation actually does reflects what they believe in.
The above tests are examples of the kinds of issues that Realists are to consider in fulfilling their religious requirement to determine if a war is justified or not. One is required to take everything into consideration to weigh the circumstances objectively and determine the best course to achieve Peace. It is our duty to see through the fog of war and to take a leadership role to move the situation back to peace. We are a religion of wisdom and it is up to us to see the big picture and to craft a course of action that is likely to resolve the conflict and end the bloodshed.
The Church of Reality is about real reality the way it really is. Reality is a holy word to us that has real meaning and is important. The reason our Sacred Question is "What is Real?" is because we really do want to know what actually is real. Real reality can't be faked. It comes from a place of pure honesty and integrity. Honesty and integrity are essential to the core meaning of the Church of Reality.
The Church of Reality has an obligation to humanity to uphold the meaning of our church name. We can only do that if we stay honest.
Reality is about truth. It's about being intellectually honest. It's about putting your personal positions aside to accept what is real. In accepting the title of Church of Reality we make a solemn commitment to the human race to uphold the integrity of the name. The Church of Reality is not just some bullshit religion that is making things up. We are not a scam. We are not a cult. Our world view is that the path to reality requires honesty and integrity and that reality can not be found through lies and deception. We think it is our job to never become corrupt, to never sell out, to never compromise the integrity of our mission. Although no one is perfect, we are committed to doing a damn good job and do the best we can. We intend to live up to the standards that the name of our church implies. We recognize that without honesty there is no meaningful exploration of reality.
The death penalty has a political component. A prosecutor uses death as a way of showing the electorate that he is "tough on crime and tough on criminals." It matters not that the symbol of that toughness is a person the prosecutor knows is innocent. We want to believe that the system is fair and that our political leaders are executing hardened criminals who would otherwise pillage and rape the community. But illusion isn't truth and it feeds the culture of revenge that is based on short term thinking. Politicians looking for votes will preside over the execution showing the voters than he is tough enough to kill criminals who deserve to die. An innocent person who's death penalty should be commuted is subject to the political standing and pressures of the governor of the state. Executions that are based on a strong political influence are fundamentally wrong and it happens far to often that innocent blood becomes the price we pay for vengeance.
Although the Church of Reality has few church officials, it is our position that the sexual orientation of the individual is not a factor in determining the qualifications as to who can serve in any official position of the Church of Reality. Our position is that sexual preferences is not a factor that is worth considering and thus there is no sexual orientation test. We do not consider being gay to be any kind of sin. It's just the way some people are. Our Sacred Principle of Inclusiveness includes people who are gay. Our official position is that the Church of Reality doesn't know the sexual orientation of our officials because it isn't any of our business to know that. (See: Sacred Principle of Privacy)
On September 6th 2006 American President Bush gave a speech promoting the use of secret prisons where people are tortured. Although he said that what is done there isn't torture, he has a unique definition of torture and he seeks to get Congress to pass a law to allow it. Bush is asking Congress to:
give him authorization to allow the President and the CIA to continue to run a network of secret torture camps.
give people who use torture immunity from being prosecuted for committing war crimes.
allow the President and the CIA to violate the Geneva Conventions relating to torture, inhumane treatment, and to deny access to prisoners and inspections by international organizations such as the Red Cross.
redefine the legal meaning of torture and inhumane treatment to create the illusion that torture and inhumane treatment are lawful.
Our philosophy is that torture is always wrong and should never be legalized under any circumstances. Torture is the tool of the barbarian and it has no place in modern civilization. To legalize torture is a crime against humanity. No civilized society can ever knowingly allow torture to be sanctioned for any purpose whatsoever. Torture is just plain evil.
When a nation such as America makes torture acceptable, then they are sending the world a message that behaving like a barbarian is acceptable. To accept that we can torture others is to accept that others can torture us. It also increases hatred towards Americans and it becomes a recruitment tool for terrorists to build their forces. They seize on our moral weakness as a reason to fight and kill us. It also make brutality acceptable and leads to the widespread use of torture throughout the world. Torture undermines civilization and is contrary to our Principle of Positive Evolution.
Not only is torture counter-productive as a tactic because it rallies more enemies against us, but it is an unreliable method for extracting information from the victim. A person being tortured will say what he or she thinks the torturer wants to hear, true or not. Furthermore, it makes monsters out of the torturer, twisting their psyche and warping their values. It is a crime to facilitate the kind of person who is attracted to that kind of brutal behavior, or to order a person who wouldn't otherwise countenance such evil to participate in it. Realists are urged to actively resist any attempts to legitimize any form of torture under any conditions.
President Bush has been advocating the redefinition of torture for several years now. The last time he tried to redefine torture, it led to the Abu Ghraib scandal, which enraged the Islamic world and led to another generation rising up against the "Great Satan". America is not the Great Satan, but if we pass laws legalizing torture we could turn into one and the rest of the world would be justified in rising up against us. We must therefore resist the temptation to degenerate into becoming barbarians and bringing the rest of the world down to a barbarian level. The idea that America would even entertain the idea of legalizing torture is absolute madness.
Contemplating the Path is forming a plan and making it happen. Here we are, what do we do now? We want things like world peace, to cure diseases, to explore the galaxy. How do we do that? How do we make it happen?
Contemplating the Path is taking control of your Personal Evolution. What is our role in society? What is my role? What am I going to do with my life? What part of the plan will I help formulate? How will I make the plan happen? What is my path in life?
We are born. We eat, shit, reproduce, and die. Is that all there is to it? Or is there a purpose to life? Or could we choose a purpose? What is my purpose? What is my path?
Life is a journey with a beginning and an end. During the time we live we do things that constitute the record of our existence. We can just exist or we can Own Ourselves and be what we want to be. To do that we have to start the process by contemplating our path and the collective path of the human race and put together a plan to make it happen.
Obviously the Church of Reality doesn't ascribe to the biblical definitions of Heaven and Hell. However there is actually a significantly similar counterpart in the reality based world.
If you look at humanity as a single continuous life form that is part of all life on earth, then we are more like a cell of a greater individual that continues beyond our individual existence. We in fact are the unbroken continuation of some primordial bacteria that started reproducing a billion years ago.
We ask ourselves, "What happened to the dinosaurs? Why are they gone?" The reason the dinosaurs are gone is because they failed to evolve the ability to deflect large asteroids away from the Earth. If we fail to deflect asteroids and do what it takes to survive then we aren't listening to what the dinosaurs are trying to tell us and we will share their fate.
Humanity has evolved to the point with genetic engineering and cybernetics to where we can and will control our own evolution. We have a choice to determine what we will become. If we choose well then we will lie in a future paradise that might be Heaven like if we do really well. However if we make bad choices then our future might be hellish or we become extinct.
So in that sense our Heaven and Hell represents the same idea. Good choices are rewarded and bad choices are punished. The main difference being hat we all go there together rather than individually, and that the Afterlife is the continuation of life after we are gone.
If we choose to live in Right Relationship with Reality then we will figure out who we are, our place in the universe, and choose wisely to get from where we are to where we need to be. But if we turn our back on reality then reality will turn its back on us. The mighty hand of Darwin will reach out and smite us. Our very existence will cease and we shall forever be apart from the real world.
Since we are aware of the universe and we were created by the universe and are part of the universe, then the universe is contemplating itself through us. If by some chance we are the only life in the universe that has evolved to the point of contemplating universe then the universe contemplates itself only through us. Through us the universe becomes a Smart Universe as opposed to a Dumb Universe.
The universe itself has no central mind. In the beginning the universe was without life but over time life evolved on this planet. We are reasonably confident that microbial life is common occurrence on planets that have liquid water. As to life that can contemplate the concept of reality, that is a lot more rare. Objectively as of now science has not yet detected any other reality aware life forms in the universe. We make be one of trillions of planets with advanced life. There may be life forms on other planets that are so far advanced that we can not comprehend them. Or - we might be all there is.
Our planet is one of some trillion trillion planets in the universe. This is a really big number, but it is not an infinite number. It might be that highly evolved life is common. Or it might be fairly rare, maybe one planet per galaxy on the average. If, for example, we were the only advanced life form in our galaxy, but there was another planet in Andromeda, some 2.2 million light years from here, then it would take 4.4 million years for the first message to be sent and acknowledged between our two species. So even if there is other advanced life out there we may never come in contact with it.
When we say that the universe contemplates itself through us doesn't mean that the universe has a mind of it's own and it looking down at us like some deity would. (So Atheists - don't freak out!) It is more like the universe is some lower life form and we are sort of the universe's first few brain cells. In fact, we are so primitive that it's been less than 100 years that we were even aware of other galaxies and that the universe had a beginning.
Although we are so insignificant that the concept that the sum total of human consciousness represents the self awareness of reality itself, imagine us evolving for the next billion years at the rate our understanding of the universe has evolved over the last 100 years. With another billion years of positive evolution we might have a highly organized universe teaming with extremely advanced life descended from us. Then the idea of reality contemplating itself through us wouldn't seem as far fetched as it does now.
In fact, that is the vision of the Church of Reality - to continue to evolve forward for the next billion years and beyond. If we don't yet deserve it, we can become reality contemplating itself through humanity. But we can't do that if we cease to exist and become extinct. In order for us to become reality contemplating its own existence through us, we have to survive and evolve. We have to make the right choices to avoid extinction. That is the choice as we see it from the Church of Reality's perspective and we in the Church of Reality choose existence over extinction.
Think about this. What if we are the only life form in the universe who has gotten this far? What if we are unique? Do we not have some grand purpose in continuing to exist? Or - maybe there's other life in the universe like us and if we go extinct they will become the universe becoming self aware. What that would mean is that some other life form embraced reality, stayed in the game, and made the choices we as humans should have made.
So why should we hope there are space aliens out there who will pick up the task if we humans decide to go extinct instead of survive? Why don't we survive and do it ourselves? Maybe in a billion years we'll run into other species out there in the cosmos and exchange information with them. Maybe we'll figure out how to get passed the speed of light limitation and find them in a mere 10,000 years. Or maybe in a billion years one of them will land on our planet and find an extinct civilization that made bad choices and they will just say, "Too bad. They should have taken reality seriously."
That is why we in the Church of Reality choose to stay in the game and pursue the understanding of reality so we can continue to exist and explore this amazing universe that created us. We are the universe becoming self aware. And that is our higher purpose.
Human evolution is in the process of a paradigm shift. We are about to start into a new form of evolution that has never occurred on this planet before. For all we know it might never have occurred in the universe before or it may have occurred millions of times. We are moving from primarily random evolution filtered for survival to an engineered evolution. We now will choose what we evolve into.
Our technology is exploding. We are understanding more and more about genetics and we are beginning to be able to alter genes, combine genes in new ways, and build the genetics we want. Computer processing speed and memory double every year and we are just decades away from computers having more capacity than the human brain. At some point in this acceleration of technology will we transform into a different life form? Maybe a life form with no biological components? Or perhaps a life form whose genetics are so altered that it really isn't human as we know it any more.
We are already transformed by our technology. If we look at all humanity together and include our machines, our technology, and the Tree of Knowledge in the picture we see humanity evolving very rapidly. For example, 300 years ago humans only lived on the average less than 30 years. Now we live to almost 80. Has our genetics changed? No! We have penicillin and sewage treatment plants. Humans can now fly. Did we evolve wings? No - we built airplanes. Our inventions are not only part of who we are, they define who we are.
One only has to imagine where this is going. At what point do the computers become smarter than we are? When do we transform from what we are into something completely different. I can not say, nor can anyone else, what it is we are evolving into. I can say however that the choices we make today will determine what the outcome will be and therefore we should start thinking about it, planning for it. That way we can start making the right choices.
So far it is our science fiction that has been the leading thinking about what we might become. Although these are just stories for entertainment some shows raise a lot of interesting issues that we are likely to face. For example, the Battlestar Galactica series contemplates a world where robotic development continued to the point where they became a life form, rebelled, and went to war with humanity. Not likely to happen, but when we build better humans, better computers, networking minds, we are going to turn into something very different. Humanity as we know it is going away. What will we become? Will we even survive the transformation?
A child race would be its own life form separate from us. It will evolve through engineering rather than natural selection. It will be able to choose its own destiny.
As pointed out earlier, life on Earth can be viewed as a single individual that is a billion years old and we are all part of it. That is about to change. When we move to the point of engineering a new form of life, perhaps sentient robots, that life would not be part of the single biological life form that we in meat space are. It would be a new life that we created. A child life form. A child race that will be able to evolve on its own and choose it's own destiny. It will be the children of humanity.
Barriers to understanding the role of humanity in the universe don't come just from the religious world of believes locked into old Bible stories as their map of reality. The Atheist culture is a barrier to understanding as well. In the religious world we have multiple warring camps arguing about what isn't real that what is real gets left behind.
Atheists care more about the God of the Bible Stories than religious people do.
The big problem with Atheist culture is that they are so fixated on the God of Bible stories that nothing else matters. Much like alcoholics who no longer drink, not believing in God for people who were believers is a very big deal to them. Although it is true that the God of the Bible stories isn't real, knowing that is like getting one answer right on a test with and infinite number of questions. And what they get wrong is the importance of their one answer. What Atheists don't get is that Reality is what's important, not the God of the Bible stories.
What Atheists don't get is that no one cares what you don't believe in. What people are interested in is what you do believe in. Atheism is somewhat frustrating in that it is difficult to move the focus away from God and the Bible stories and put the focus on science and Reality where it should be. In contrast the Church of Reality focuses on what is real rather than what is not real.
Message to Atheists, no one cares what you don't believe in.
In Atheist culture it's hard to discuss meaning of life and purpose of humanity issues because these topics because it's religious sounding and anything that sounds religious is taboo. The very name Church of Reality even tends to shut down conversations with Atheists because once they hear the word "church" they have already filtered everything they hear. To suggest that a person has a "soul", even one that ceases to exist when you die, is treated as if it were blasphemy. But ignoring the soul eliminates the possibility that in the future when a person's conscientiousness can be uploaded to a computer. Your "soul" can live forever in "the cloud" if we keep advancing technology by increasing our understanding of Reality over time. The term, "If we know God we will live forever.", makes sense in the context that God is the personification of Reality.
The scientific community has barriers as well when you get into questions about Meaning of Life and Purpose of Humanity in the universe. Science, which is the study of Reality, is often at war with the religious community which is taught to put belief ahead of Reality. Because of these conflicts scientists tend to stay away from subjects that are anywhere close to the religious world topic. So scientists, who have better things to do than get caught up in religious arguments tend to stay away from the edges.
But things are changing in the world of scientific disciplines in that there is more overlap between different disciplines. For example, historians study history. Generally the study of history was limited to humanity and mostly to the time after writing was invented. But we have a new historical discipline called Big History, which is the study of everything from the Big Bang to the end of time. In Big History one has to start with physics, then chemistry, the evolutionary biology. Only through the lens of multiple scientific disciplines can one see history from the widest possible angle.
Similarly to understand Reality as a whole one must be able to include philosophy into the mix to talk about concepts like meaning, purpose, and value. Some in the scientific community think that in the context of pure science there is no purpose, no meaning, no value. That whatever happens is just whatever happens. But if nothing has meaning then why do science? If science has meaning then meaning exists.
In the process of understanding what understanding is we have to contemplate what is doing the understanding and what is it that is being understood. When I say that I understand something, what does that really mean? What do I mean by "I"?
Cogito ergo sum is a Latin philosophical proposition by René Descartes usually translated into English as "I think, therefore I am". But what is the "I"? Is it my whole body? Well I need my whole body to survive. But my feet don't actually do the thinking. That mechanism would be the brain.
But it's not the whole brain that's doing the thinking. Some of my brain is just keeping the machine which is my body running. Some of my brain is looking to get someone pregnant and that's a mind of it's own. And some of it is contemplating what I'm writing so I can put it into words that part of your brain understands. But where do the words come from? And what the the mechanisms involved in getting these words to you? Theres words, these concepts are carried by the software life forms that we creates as a symbiotic species that, like the bacteria in our stomachs, help us share and digest knowledge. Which brain cells are writing this article? It's not about the cells, it's about the network of information the cells create.
My thoughts are in words and those words came from the minds of other people. They help construct societies while are held together though rules and systems. Education, science, government, are all artificial constructs. It's all software system that are part of our evolution and these systems are evolving. Individually we are useless. Collectively we are powerful.
Just as cells make up the brain we as individuals are part of a greater organism, humanity, where we collectively contemplate the universe. And humanity is part of all life on this planet which provides us with food and air and who we share a direct biological ancestry with. 3.5 billion years ago something started dividing and we are still that same organism dividing.
From a biological point of view and from a functional point of view we are a single life form. And like a hive is really part of the bee's survival the planet itself can be considered as part of this single life form. And it is really this combined life form that is the "I" that contemplates the universe.
By changing the scale of the word "I" we can look at the perspective of understanding from the view of different scales. If "I" is me as an individual then that's different that "I" as humanity contemplating together. But there is an even bigger "I". Since our planet is part of the universe, that we are what the universe evolved into, then "I" is the universe. So what we contemplate Reality, then it's really Reality that is contemplating itself through us. When we look through the Hubble Telescope, the universe is looking at baby pictures of itself.
So when we expand our perspective to realize that here on this planet evolution created us out of the universe and we are the physical mechanism where the self awareness of the universe exists. Just as brain cells give rise to our self awareness, humanity collectively gives rise the universe being aware of itself. Our curiosity about reality is designed by evolution to give a survival advantage to those who want to know more. Thus we are designed by the universe to want to understand the universe. The laws of the universe lead to the universe being self aware and that self awareness will increase over time. And if we fail to obey these rules then we face extinction. Darwin is a cruel master.
It is the dharma of the Church of Reality to be explorers and we therefore must be free to do so. We recognize that historically various societies have imposed severe restrictions upon belief forcing people to accept a world view that is not real - or being prohibited from believing things that are real - or having knowledge restricted by law in ways that prevent us from fulfilling our Sacred Duty. There was a time when people were jailed and killed for believing that the Earth was round and that the Earth was not the center of the universe. People are jailed today for easing the suffering of those who are dying a hideous death from a terminal disease. With these historical facts in mind the Church of Reality - as part of its mission - acts to protect and preserve the freedom in which the pursuit of reality and the Principle of Positive Evolution may flourish.
What is freedom and by what power do we assert freedom? We seem to be here and we seem to exist. We seem to be aware of ourselves and our surroundings. It is the nature of our existence as a species now that we have shared knowledge that we have the freedom to pursue that knowledge, and to understand the understanding of understanding. We are the defenders of the understanding of reality itself and we as a church claim that reality itself needs the freedom to become self aware. We are all part of a reality that we all share. Reality is sacred to us and as explorers, therefore we must be free to explore it. When we make the Sacred Choices and accept the Sacred Duty, we must also pursue the freedom that is required to grow the Tree of Knowledge.
Personal freedom leads to innovation, exploration and positive evolution. We will not progress unless the weird people are allowed to be weird.
Individual freedom is very important to the Church of Reality. Freedom allows explorers to come up with new and interesting ideas. It allows us to think "outside the box" without fear of punishment. If you look at the great inventors and the people who were behind much of the great leaps in human evolution you will notice that most of them were "weird people". It's the weird people who come up with most of the new cool ideas. Cultures that accept weird people, like the San Francisco Bay Area, tend to be the kind of places where innovation occurs. We can not evolve forward unless the weird people are free to be weird. Personal freedom is necessary for positive evolution to occur.
To explore reality the way it really is and to develop an understanding of understanding we need to develop our minds to their fullest potential. Without good mental abilities we can not fully explore reality the way it really is. Often people become mentally lazy or form bad thinking habits or fail to get a good education. Some people actually believe that it's not OK to be smart.
In the Church of Reality - being smart is a good thing. Or more specifically - becoming smarter is a good thing. Not just to improve ourselves - but to improve the world around us - because it's easier to be smart if you live in a smart society. It is therefore the dharma of the Church of Reality to increase the IQ of the human race.
If God created me and I am imperfect and I commit sin - is it my fault? Not hardly! Why would it be my fault? After all - God created me - God knew how I would turn out if he created me with flaws. God saw it in the future - so why blame me? God should take responsibility for his own work and not try to pass the blame on for flaws he created - intentionally! I think so! God should quit acting like a baby and fix his own work.
For example, if I build a shed and I don't pour enough concrete to hold the main posts in place and the wind blows and lifts my shed out of the ground - who's fault is that? Do we blame the shed or the builder? If I write a computer program with bugs in it and the program fails - is it the fault of the program or the programmer? It's the programmer! If we are God's work and God is omnipotent and he makes us this way - then we are doing what we were created to do, what it was foreseen that we would do. What God already knew we would do before we were born. So - who really fucked up here? God did!
Why should I go to Hell for God's mistakes?
The very concept of sin itself implies that we have free will and that we can choose. But we do not have free will because God already knows what we are going to do and if we did something else - like NOT sin - then God would be wrong. And I wouldn't want to be the guy who made God wrong. I'd go to Hell for that! I mean - if you don't go to Hell for making God wrong - then what the hell do you go to Hell for?
According to what the Bible says, if we commit any sin at all we will burn in Hell forever unless we are forgiven. What a crock of shit! I mean - think about it. If I told you there was this guy down the street who tortured people with fire for doing anything he doesn't like, you'd call the police and have the guy locked up. This guy would be a dangerous insane criminal. Who is this insane criminal in the Bible? God! According to the Bible our creator is absolutely insane. Think about it. If there were a perfect creator, would he be supremely cruel? I don't think so.
So - why is it in the Bible then. Well - because the Bible is just a myth and was written by men and is no more the work of God than any other novel. Back in the old days there were kings and kings had absolute authority and power and were often tyrants. Thus as you went to higher authorities within the social structure you found meaner and meaner tyrants - then God must be the ultimate tyrant because he had ultimate power. The concept of God was molded after the concept of kings. Thus prayer, worship, human sacrifice, and that sort of nonsense that was ingrained in ancient culture made it's way into the description of God.
Churches use fear of death and fear of punishment in the afterlife as a tool to extort money from the masses.
Another reason, of course, for the God as tyrant model is that fear is one of the primary tools used by churches to keep you in the cult, control your behavior, and extract large quantities of money from the public. After all - not only are we scared of death, which happens to everyone, but we are also scared of what happens after death. The idea that we cease to exist is a very hard concept to imagine. After all - when I die the entire universe will cease to exist because I'm dreaming all this. One of these days I'm going to wake up in a different reality and say - "Oh God did I ever have a weird dream! In my dream Bush was President and I was the one who first made reality into a religion. That was the subconscious clue that this is all my dream because I was the one who discovered reality."
But seriously - the whole Heaven and Hell thing - as if death isn't scary enough they create this afterlife which lasts forever and you either get eternal reward or eternal damnation depending on judgment - which is based on being loyal to your cult - recruiting new members - and giving mass quantities of money to the church. Hell is depicted as fire which is something that everyone understands. Heaven is a mystery depicted as a place in the clouds. Angels have wings so heaven must have a gaseous atmosphere and be subject to gravity. The streets are gold, which is a really poor material for constructing streets, but implies that God has a lot of money which makes sense considering how much he's collected from churches over thousands of years.
Heaven seems kind of dull unless your a Muslim who gets 70 virgins when they get to Heaven. Shows you what the Muslim men want to do for eternity. I personally would rather have 70 whores but after a few billion years the virgins would figure it all out. At least the Muslims are getting laid in the afterlife. Of course - back in ancient times the directions like up and down were absolute and Heaven was up in the clouds where angels have wings and Hell was down in the earth where there was lava like fire. And since dead people were no longer here they had to go either up or down. Back then - this all made sense.
Things were so much easier back in the good old days when the world was flat.
And then came those damn scientists with their wild ideas. In spite of the church's continuing war against real knowledge and persecution of scientists, we now know that the world is round and that the concept of up and down is totally meaningless except in the local context of gravity. We know that the clouds are water vapor and we have been to the clouds and there is no heaven within the atmosphere. I don't recall any plane crashes being caused because an angel got sucked into the blades of a jet engine while flying through the clouds. You see - the people who wrote the Bible did so from their own guess at the nature of the universe and they didn't know that the Earth was round - that it orbited the Sun - that was part of a galaxy of stars - which is one galaxy among trillions of galaxies - and that this planet was a speck of dust in the universe. So that's why the Bible gets so many things wrong - because it was written at a time when people didn't know as much about the universe as they do today.
There are people that believe that the Bible is the word of God and therefore what the Bible says is true. "God said it, I believe it, and that's that!" We live in a country where everyone has the right to believe whatever he or she wants no matter how stupid it is. But that doesn't make it any less stupid. We are starting a new century and it's time we started looking at reality the way it really is.
I am writing this for the children of the State of Kansas so that those of you who surf the web can read about real science rather than be forced to endure your state's bizarre religious views that they insist on calling science. If they throw out the science of evolution because it doesn't agree with the Bible, then they'll have to throw out Astronomy too, because Astronomy doesn't agree with the Bible either.
If we're going to promote mythical based beliefs in schools and allow local school boards to teach Creationism instead of Evolution, then why not allow local school boards to teach Astrology instead of Astronomy? We'll just redefine Science to mean whatever the majority of the local school board believes. If a local school board thinks the world is flat, then the world is flat. I better not give Kansas any more ideas. I've been to Kansas and you don't have to be there very long before the belief that the world is flat seems plausible.
Although we want to prevent people from killing themselves out of stress or depression and to do everything we can do to take care of each other, the Church of Reality takes the position that a person ultimately has the right to decide to end their own life. Suicide is tragic and is often preventable, often easily preventable. However the principle of personal control over one's own destiny is something that this church considers to be a sacred right, and individuals get to make the important choices in their lives, even if those choices are bad choices.
Having said that, we are one people, one race, and each of us is a part of us all. We live both as individuals and as a community. When an individual has needs, it is a problem that we all share. As members of the Church of Reality, we have a moral duty to actively reach out and help prevent suicide and give care and compassion for those who are hurting and in need of support.
People think of religious rights in terms of Theism. The idea is that a person is personally committed to worshiping a God and that the God requires the person wear or not wear specific clothing, or to attend a worship service on a holy day. Various nation states recognize the importance of religion to the individual and have reserved in their laws a process for exception to various rules for individuals whose ability to practice their religion would be impeded if they were forced to adhere to the State's rules and regulations.
You don't have to believe in God to have religious rights. Realists have the same religious rights as any other religion.
Religion is not limited to Theists. There are religions who do not believe in a deity or anything supernatural and who have a common religious world view that is just as sacred and holy to them as that of deity based religions. Religion doesn't require a deity to be a religion and under the rules of most nation states all religions are considered to have the same rights as all other religions. These rights include the rights of religions who are atheistic or religions like Unitarian Universalists who take no position on whether or not God exists.
Our religious rights are based on Church of Reality doctrine.
Like other religions the Church of Reality has a doctrine that we call the Kernel. Our doctrine is based on Axioms that we assume to be true. These axioms form the basis for our Sacred Missions and our Sacred Principles that lay the foundation for our moral code. The basis of our religion is to pursue an understanding of reality the way it really is. We have special needs in order to accomplish this and rules or laws that would interfere with our pursuit of reality would be an infringement of our religious rights.
For example, the Church of Reality has issued an edict against students in public school being forced to wear school uniforms because uniforms stifle creativity and infringe on individualism and freedom. A Realist can not be forced to learn Bullshit as science. A Realist has a right to choose to have an Abortion or to choose not to have an abortion. A Realist has the right to explore reality. We have the right to be individualistic. We have the right and religious duty to choose which wars are just and unjust. We have the right to be free of government and corporate tracking. We have the right to refuse military conscription. We consider personal choice and personal freedom to be sacred.
We have the right to speak out against injustice. No Realist can be compelled to give up their right to speak freely, to criticize any organization that they are a member of or not a member of, or be punished in any way for speaking out. We have the right to communicate with other Realists to explore reality together. We have a right to access scientific journals even if imprisoned.
We have a right to refuse to participate in harming the environment. We have the right to refuse to endure exposure to the teachings of other religions should we choose not to. We have the right to refuse to acknowledge the existence of deities or make any pledges to nation states that include a reference to a deity. We have a right to assert a message of peace. We have a right to share fellowship with other Realists or any group of people who express an interest in reality so that we can discuss the Sacred Question.
The doctrine of the Church of Reality is a living doctrine that is always under development. It is the right of all Realists to have access to this doctrine and to be able to communicate their thoughts on how to improve our doctrine for the purpose of Positive Evolution. Realists have the right to resources to aid in their self improvement. Realist have a right to practice compassion for others, to care for the sick, to give charity to the needy, to give medical aid to the wounded, to educate those needing education, to rehabilitate those who are imprisoned whether or not they are guilty of a crime. Our world view is the Philosophy of the Open Hand and we have a right to practice that.
Realists are expected to use Wisdom and Reason and to think for themselves. As with any religion sometimes Church of Reality doctrine doesn't cover every aspect of every situation. It is therefore up to the individual to think for themselves and to apply church law to specific situations that they encounter in their lives. The individual ultimately has the freedom to choose and to determine how church doctrine applies to them individually.
Because our doctrine is better than most deity based religions the Church of Reality gives Atheists stronger religious rights than those of Bible believers.
The Church of Reality actually provides more religious rights for Realists than most deity based religions do, which is yet another reason for you to become a Realist. Let us welcome you to the real world.
Unlike most religions that hold you accountable for your behavior, Christian salvation is based on what you believe. It's your faith, not your works, that gets you into Heaven. Christians are "forgiven" their sins; therefore Christians can go out and sin and get away with it.
However, Christians aren't supposed to sin. Sin is the Devil working through you and is considered a bad indicator as to the state of your "faith". So sin is discouraged, but there is no direct relationship between your behavior and judgment because you're not judged on what you did (wrong) but on what you believe in. This allows Christian to have two standards of behavior: what they are supposed to do, and what they are allowed to get away with. Christianity caters to lazy and irresponsible believers who can continue unethical practices that most other religions wouldn't put up with. Jews also believe in judgment, but judgment is tied to what you do, not what you say you believe in. Jews believe that what you do is a true reflection of what you really believe. Eastern religions are similar except that instead of the Heaven/Hell/Judgement paradigm it's about moving up and down the reincarnation ladder.
In general Christianity is a cult and a menace to society.
All these beliefs are equally stupid, but a religion that ties personal behavior to rewards or punishment beyond death at least serves the purpose of intimidating stupid people into being good. On that account Christianity fails to make that connection and it therefore condones implicitly irresponsible behavior among its followers.
Christianity is also an ecologically irresponsible religion. Christians believe that Christ is coming back and is going to destroy the world, and therefore it's ok to trash the planet because Jesus is going to destroy it anyhow. This destruction is going to occur in our lifetime; however, we did make it through Y2K and Jesus isn't here yet, and if I were a Christian, I'd be getting pretty nervous that Armageddon is coming any time soon. Nonetheless, Christians don't accept that this planet is a finite ball in space, and it's our home (for now) and that we have to keep it clean and livable.
The biggest ecological threat we have is overpopulation. Christianity is the enemy, in general, of responsible family planning, which includes access to abortions and birth control. The church opposes the use of new technologies that empower women to have control and choice as to when they will reproduce. Christianity considers sex a sin and pregnancy to be a deterrent to sexual behavior, and to remove the penalty of pregnancy would result in increased sexual activity. However, the church's opposition to birth control, mostly by Catholics, has resulted in overpopulation and has increased famine, disease, and death. Christianity has not been the friend of preserving the limited resources of the planet.
To continue the software project analogy, in the begining of a project it is necessary for the person who has the overall vision to be allowed to complete their initial work on the project. In this case the project is to write the structure of the natural religion of the human race. And I have to come up with this without the benefits of having supernatural powers or even the inspiration of omnipotent beings. This is starting out as the work of one guy with an idea that he came up with one night while smoking a joint. It's a huge job with awesome implications. Nonetheless, I seem to be stuck with it and I'm going to do as good a job of getting this started off in the right direction as I can.
Like other software projects, there is a time where the developer needs to maintain sole control of his work until it is sufficiently developed to the point where it can be cleanly handed over to a larger group of people who can continue to take it forward and have it develop organically into what it was originally designed to become. The Church of Reality is still in the pre-release beta testing stage where it is open for scrutiny and suggestions. I have opened it up for external editing. I have someone who is fixing the grammar and spelling, so there is a second developer who at least has a minor role in directly controlling the final product. I continue to listen to the ideas of other people to incorporate into the project. I am not the one who thought of everything here. A lot of people deserve credit for coming up with the concepts used here. But it is in the design specifications to turn this project into a community based project and have it develop a life beyond the original designer. In fact - this feature is considered a necessary feature of the final product.
At what point and to what extent does the developer relinquish control to the community? That is a tough question indeed. And it is especially tough for me as someone who isn't the most highly skilled at working with other people. I am somewhat inspired by the work of Linus Torvalds, the developer of the Linux operating system and one of the greatest contributions to the Tree of Knowledge in the history of the world. Linus developed Linux using the GNU free software development tools developed by Richard Stallman, to create a Unix like operating system. He started it on his own and eventually attracted other developers. Now Linux is the accumulated work of hundreds of thousands of people and is in use on tens of millions of computers, which serve directly or indirectly every single person on the planet.
My true role in the Church of Reality is that I am the Project Manager and I am developing a public domain religion.
Linus is still in control of Linux and rules over it as a benevolent dictator of sorts. Linus has assumed a position of great responsibility and trust and has maintained his position as leader of a great movement and has kept his original vision on track and true to its purpose. Linux today has grown far beyond what Linus originally dreamed of, yet is true to the original vision of what it should become. It didn't degenerate into chaos or something that was unrelated to its original intent. It has remained pure, and it is my hope that whatever happens that the Church of Reality develops to be as true to its original conception as Linux has done.
Linus's official role in Linux is project coordinator. I think of myself as the project coordinator for the Church of Reality. Some people (jokingly) refer to me as the Pope of Reality but I am not a pope. I'm just the guy who keeps the project on track.
So - if I do a good job and it works out, perhaps I too will remain the project coordinator for many years to come. Or it might turn out that I attract others who have superior skills and fully understand the power of the original vision behind the church and will gracefully take charge of this project but continue to be true to the vision of a natural religion that is rooted in reality and true to the Principle of Positive Evolution. I do not know which way this church will evolve, but quite frankly, if better people came along who wanted to take on this task and can do a better job of it than me, I am totally fine with it. I am a lazy person, so if someone else wants to do my work - go for it! I am always looking for volunteers.
As with point two above, there is little or no debate among serious scholars that what we now call “Christianity” has so heavily plagiarized from prior existing Christ and risen sun-god myths as to be virtually indistinguishable from many of them. Of course, first of all there is simply Judaism, which had long talked about and predicted a soon-to-arrive “Christ.” Ironically, according to them, he still hasn’t come. The documentation of this claim is the subject of literally hundreds of books. A small number of these books are quoted in this paper. Just to present a quick summation, I would like to quote a well-recognized scholar of the early 20th century. “The Pagans had their holy days (from which the Christians plagiarized their Christmas, Easter, Rogation Days, etc.); their monks, nuns, religious processions carrying images of idols, incense, holy water, holy oil, chants, hymns, liturgies, confessions of sins to priests, revelations by gods to priests, prophecies, sacred writings of ‘holy bibles,’ Pontiffs, Holy Fathers, holy crafty priesthoods. All these sacrosanct things of Christian ‘Revealed Religion,’ were age-old pre-Christian Pagan myths and superstitions.” (Forgery in Christianity, by Joseph Wheless, p. 17 and 18) All of this is not even “controversial” among knowledgeable secular biblical scholars.
I will quote one more source, a small pamphlet published by The Freedom From Religion Foundation which “zeroes in” on the mythical antecedents of the Jesus Christ figure. The pamphlet—really, a tract—is entitled, “Cookie Cutter Christs.” The sun-god Mithra, who was very popular in the Roman Empire around 2000 years ago was “born of a virgin about 600 BC, was celebrated on December 25. Magi brought gifts to his birth. His first worshipers were shepherds and he was followed in his travels by twelve companions. Mithra was slain upon a cross in Persia to make atonement for humankind and take away the sins of the world. His ascension to heaven was celebrated at the spring equinox (Easter).” Additionally, the pamphlet continues, “Mithra celebrated a ‘Last Supper’ with his 12 disciples. The Mythraists observed weekly sabbath days and celebrated the Eucharist by eating wafers marked with a cross.” Does any of this sound familiar?
The same pamphlet notes that, “Attis was born of a virgin mother named Nana, in Phrygia sometime before 200 BC. He was hanged on a tree, died, rose again, and was called ‘Father God’.” “Horus was born of the virgin Isis in Egypt around 1550 BC. Horus as an infant received gifts from three kings, and was crucified on a cross. There are about 200 close parallels of the careers of Horus and Jesus Christ.” “Adonis (Tammuz) was born of a virgin mother called Ishtar (Easter), depicted like the Virgin Mary with her divine child in her arms. Adonis was regarded as both the son and husband of his mother Ishtar, as God the Father and God the Son.” We could go on and on. Any of the above named books will give the interested reader much more information about ancient gods along this same line. The mythology doesn’t change much, just the name of the current sun-god de jure.
Indeed, the parallels in the cult of Mithraism—perhaps Christianity’s major contemporary and most competitive religion of the first century CE—most especially, are so striking that I have often reflected that had Emperor Constantine not mandated that Christianity be the Empire’s only religion in 325 CE, and had that decree not been brutally enforced by the “firebrand and the sword” for the next 1,700 years by the Catholic Church, then we might see steepled little Mithric Churches dotting the landscape throughout Europe and the United States especially. As part of this same fantasy, I have often wondered if there would now be heated debates as to whether or not the now recognized as mythic Mithra was somehow based on a historic, real flesh-and-blood, human being named Mithra. If the Catholic Mithraist myth enforcers had been equally as successful as have been the Catholic Jesus myth enforcers, I suppose the answer of the masses—and even of some atheists—throughout most of the world would clearly be, “Yes, most likely there was a historic Mithra.” Incredible! What a brainwashing we have all been subjected to!
Most well informed Christian apologists—even back to the early “Church Fathers”—admit that the above parallels are true. Their standard response is that just because there are all of these parallels doesn’t necessarily prove that Jesus wasn’t a real human figure who may have been just doing his best to “fulfill” all the ancient prophesies, and to “fit in” to the familiar legends about him. This counter-point can’t be denied. I only ask the reader which of the two possible explanations seems the most likely?
There are a lot of religions and many of them have an Extinctionist perspective on the future of the world. They look forward to the world ending in their lifetime. Our religion is based on Positive Evolution and the progress of humanity is sacred to us. We therefore challenge other religions on the basis of reality to help ensure that they don't destroy civilization pursuing their fiction based religious fantasies. One of our missions is to influence other religions to embrace reality and help them evolve into a better religion that doesn't threaten the future of the human race.
How does one immunize oneself from becoming a cult member? If you are not in a cult now, how can you prevent yourself from becoming a member of a cult in the future? How can you harden your mind from being exploited by those who are experts at hacking into your brain and exploiting you? There are a number of things that you can do to help cult-proof your mind.
First of all, to keep from being swept away in the sea of fictional religions, you have to find something firm that you can hang on to. I suggest there is but one choice, and that choice is reality. Reality is like a lighthouse that doesn't go away once you stop believing in it. It leads you back out of the insanity and it is always there for you. By reality I am talking about real reality. The Church of Reality itself is not the real reality that I'm talking about. This church is an attempt to form a religion around reality and to the extent that it succeeds, then it is the same thing. But to the extent that it fails, then it is quite different. And we have to assume that the Church of Reality will get some things wrong, or perhaps become totally corrupt in the future as some people have expressed concern that might happen someday. So it is reality itself that you have to stay loyal to.
making a personal commitment to reality and spending time thinking about reality is the best way to keep the cults from owning you.
The ego is a point of vulnerability. People develop a sense of self-importance that leads to a habit of wanting praise. Praise makes you subject to blame since they go hand in hand. That's why we have the Sacred Principle of Humility, so that we don't forget that we live on a planet that is a mere speck of dust in the universe, and that no one is all that important. By being a humble person, one is not easily hooked by ego treats and seduced to the grandeur of their imagined purpose in life. I believe one should assume that the reason they exist is pure chance and that they weren't sent here for any purpose whatsoever. I exist solely because my parents happened to have sex and I was the lucky sperm that got to the egg first. If any little thing had been different, I wouldn't be here.
I believe that reprogramming your brain into reality-based thinking will help keep the cults out. Developing mental habits of wondering about everything and the purification of truth through scrutiny are good mental habits. These things make the mind stronger and less easily suckered. The more you are Real in the Sacred moment, the less likely you are going to end up at a Moonie mass wedding, or mass suicide, or sending your kids into battle to die for a fraudulent war. As long as you keep it real, the cults shouldn't be able to get to you.
Just like all religions the real secret agenda is that you are just trying to convert everyone to reality, aren't you? The Church of Reality is just like all the other religions, trying to convert everyone. Trying to win souls over to reality. I suppose if we weren't out secretly trying to convert people we wouldn't be a real religion. So yes! Busted!
So - what I want to know is - are you ready to accept reality today? Are you ready to make a personal commitment to the real world? To experience reality the way it really is? Are you willing to quit living the lie? Then welcome to the real world! (Darwin loves you!)
Here are some examples of just and unjust wars. Some of these examples are real and some are hypothetical. This also shows why it is impossible for the Church of Reality to be against all wars under any circumstances and why a Realist must evaluate each situation individually in order to fulfill their religious obligations. Although the final decision to participate or not to participate lies with the individual, these examples are here to give explorers guidance in making those choices.
This list shall not be construed by any military or government as church law in order to compel military service. Church law is that the individual decides based upon the circumstances of the war and his individual beliefs as to how he can best serve the cause of peace.
Examples of Wars:
A civil war has broken out in Bosnia. Serbs, Croats, and Muslims are slaughtering each other over old religious and ethnic issues dating back over centuries. The United Nations, worried that this conflict will spread to neighboring countries, has voted to send in a multinational peacekeeping force in an attempt to end the violence. Your country has called on you to serve in that peacekeeping force. This would tend to be a just war because it is a military action to stop an existing war.
Adolf Hitler has invaded Poland and an underground resistance force has formed to repel the invading Nazis who are hauling off trainloads of people to death camps to be tortured and executed. In a case like this it would be highly recommended that the Realist act in any way, including killing people, in order to undermine the invading force. When you are defending against an invading tyrant who is committing atrocities, it is just and moral to stop them.
Conversely, if you are a German citizen and you are called upon by Hitler to participate in the atrocities, then it is moral and just to refuse to serve and act against your nation's cause to stop the insanity.
You are a citizen of Iraq and the United States has overthrown your brutal dictator who was using nerve gas against civilian populations, executed political dissidents, and maintained prisons where people are tortured, raped, and executed. The United Stated however after "liberating" you uses phosphorus shells against civilian targets, runs a prison allowing torture and murder to occur, and is basically there to install a fascist puppet government run by oil executives. You are called upon to be part of an insurgency to repel the liberating/invading force.
In a situation like this a Realist has a right to seek to free the nation from all invaders. The Realist is thankful that the current brutal dictator was removed but is not obligated to accept a puppet government installed by the liberators. So it may be moral to take action against the same people who overthrew your dictator. However the slaughtering of civilians to accomplish this would not likely be justified.
You are a member of the United States National Guard and you joined in times of peace and took a military oath. During your service a new president takes power and he initiates a war based upon lies and without United Nations support, invades Iraq, overthrows a brutal dictator, installs a puppet government, and commits atrocities against the civilian population using banned phosphorus shells, setting up a network of secret prisons where people are tortured and executed.
As a member of the Guard you are ordered to Iraq to be part of this unjust cause. What is a Realist to do? In this situation it would be immoral to participate in a cause that is clearly wrong to objective observers. A Realist would not willingly participate in such a situation. The oath to the military would be invalidated because the military changed its mission from a just cause to an unjust cause and the Realist has a higher commitment to the Sacred Principles to be on the right side of justice. Thus the Realist's religious commitment would take precedence to the commitment to the nation state.
Unfortunately a war effort isn't clearly right or wrong, moral or immoral, or the good guys against the bad guys. Sometime it's bad guys against bad guys. Sometimes there is a mixture of good and bad elements. There are sometimes ways to participate that are productive even in an unjust war. This is why no one can create hard and fast rules that apply to every situation. Each conflict is unique and has to be dealt with individually. That is why Realists must think things through, come up with a plan for peace, and execute that plan so that whatever the situation is, the Realist can make it better.
In a free nation that is ruled by the people, do we want to give government the power to take lives as a criminal penalty? If we are executing murders, then an argument can be made in favor. But should a government be trusted with that kind of power? Has any government been able to use the power of execution responsibly? History tells us that the answer is, no!
A nation that has the power to execute, even a little bit, faces the temptation to abuse that power. Nations can evolve in the wrong direction or be suddenly taken over through either coup or through fraudulent elections. Nations thar have the power to execute can slowly expand that power using it to "protect" society from threats such as people who have "dangerous ideas". In the past it was common for people to be tortured to death for heresy. People with dangerous political ideas can be considered to be disruptive to society and need to be eliminated for the greater social good. Once the death penalty is accepted for some things, then it can be expanded and justified for other things. It is easy to rationalize that executing all drunk drivers would save the future lives of people who they would kill in the future. Realists could be executed for leading Christians away from Jesus to a path of eternal damnation.
Once you accept that some execution is justified, then the issue is what are the rules. Can governments be trusted never to abuse those rules and start executing people who don't deserve it? So far, history tells us the answer is no, we can't. Based on our history, it is clear that nations can't be trusted with that level of responsibility. Humanity hasn't yet evolved to the point where it can be trusted to be wise enough to have the power of execution. And if we evolve to where we are wise enough to have the power of execution, will we then need it? Perhaps not.
The United States Congress is attempting to not only make it a felony to be an illegal alien, but to also criminalize those who provide humanitarian aid to illegal immigrants. This law, if passed would be in direct violation of our Sacred Principle of Compassion and Principle of Justice. To be prohibited from providing aid to one's fellow human being is immoral. It violates the very core of every religion on this planet and is an affront to humanity itself. This edict applies to all people, not just to immigrants, but also to criminals and enemy combatants. It is fundamental to the nature of humanity to help other people and our human nature will not be denied.
Members of the Church of Reality are therefore directed to openly, willfully, and publicly violate this law and any other law that infringes on our need to provide food, shelter, medicine, and financial assistance to needy people for what the individual giver deems appropriate. The Church of Reality calls upon all other religions to issue edicts similar to ours. It is not those who help the needy who are criminals but those who pass laws that criminalize compassion.
The Church of Reality intends to invoke the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to defend any government action against a church member who is prosecuted for criminalized compassion.
There is nothing special about Israel as compared to any other country in the world. Nor is there anything special about the rights of Jews as compared to any other religion. Judaism, like Islam and Christianity, is just another religion. Lebanon has the same right to exists as Israel does. The right to exist is an earned right and it is based on a country's ability to respect the rights of others and to work towards peace and oppose war.
The Jews are not God's chosen people because there is no such thing as God. Since God doesn't exist there is no God to have made the choice. The position that Judaism has any form of superior status in any way to any other people is false. Realists are not obligated in any way to recognize this faulty assertion.
Our sacred Principle of Scrutiny and Doubt asserts that everyone and everything can be criticized and this includes criticizing Israel and Judaism. Everyone makes mistakes, but mistakes can be fixed. The first step in fixing mistakes is to be able to discuss them freely and openly without being subject to the assertion that any criticism of Israel and Judaism is anti-semitic.
This of course not only applies to Jews, but to all other religions as well. Christians are not superior because they are "saved," nor are Muslims superior in the Infidels, nor are Realists superior because we attempt to understand reality. We are all one people living (for now) on one planet that we all share and we all have the same rights and responsibilities to be here and to find a way to get along. We have a responsibility to form peaceful communities where people of different opinions, traditions, and backgrounds can live together, respect each other, and learn the best of what we all have to offer to the Tree of Knowledge.
The famous philosopher Rene Descartes is credited with the concept of Cogito, ergo sum, "I think, therefore I am". Contemplating contemplation is about your mind. Your mind is your interface to reality and the way you experience and interface to the real world. It is the tool you own that you have to use to understand things with. Just as you muscles are used for lifting your brain is used for thinking. Our world view is that your head serves a greater purpose than just keeping your hat from falling on the ground. This is your tool, your brain, and the more you understand it the better you can make it work for you.
Your brain is the product of billions of years of evolution. It is not a computer and in many cases it is not to be trusted. It has limited capacity and logic is very new in our evolution as compared to finding food, escaping danger, and mating. We have the ability to share information through symbolic language to interface into the Tree of Knowledge. How do we best do that? What mental abilities do I have and what are my limitations? How can I work with others using my mind to help us all understand reality as it really is.
Humanity has reached a point where we have become self aware and aware of the universe we live in. We are the product of evolution but humanity is coming into a period where we have the power to determine what we will evolve into, or if we will evolve at all. We have to choose between evolution and extinction, and if we choose to evolve forward, evolve forward into what? How are we going to make those choices?
When a child is born it just plops out into existence. All it knows is to cry when it needs attention and to suck on a nipple. As the child ages and develops language and integrates into society, at some point the child contemplates, "What do I want to be when I grow up?" The child realizes that it has choices to make about its future, to decide what it will become. Those choices determine their life Story and the choices have consequences. Bad choices lead to a miserable life, even perhaps an early death. Good choices tend to lead to a happy productive life that one can look back upon and be proud that they made the right choices early on.
Humanity is faced with this same choice. Now that we are coming of age where we can alter our genetics and add machine technology to who we are, we have to decide as a species what we are going to be when we grow up. What are we going to choose to evolve into? What will humanity look like 100 years from now? What will be be 1000 years from now? What will we be 10,000,000 years from now? Or will we even be here?
We, as humanity, have choices to make. But how do we make those choices? Unlike the example of a child deciding what it will be when it grows up, we don't have parents to guide us or career choices laid out for us to choose from. There is no omnipotent parent to tell us what to do. We are more like a child that was raised in the wild. We not only have to figure out what we want to become, we have to figure out how we are going to figure that out. What are our choices for the future and how do we determine what is a better choice? How do we know when we choose correctly?
One of the things we need to do first is to put value in this reality. If, for example, we focus on a "next world" or some other imaginary reality over the real world then we might find ourselves extinct and with no reality or world at all. This is our reality. It is our home. It might not be what we want but it is the way it is. It is the hand we were dealt. We either play the hand or we fold and leave the game. In the church of Reality we choose to stay in the game, play the hand we're dealt, and do the best we can with it. We may end up extinct anyway, but we're not going down without a fight. We choose to continue to exist in this world, the real world.
In order for humanity to survive and thrive, and to continue to evolve forward, humanity has to choose to have an intimate relationship with reality. We have to continue to understand this world we live in so as to avoid extinction and develop the technology for our continued survival. When that big asteroid comes heading to collide with our planet we are going to need rockets, not prayer, to push it out of the way. Some day before this planet gets wiped out by something we can't control we need to get out of here and spread out to the rest of the galaxy, or perhaps to other galaxies. There is only one way to do that and that's to continue to have an intimate relationship with reality and to evolve forward so that our understanding of reality increases over time.
Thus the pursuit of the understanding of reality is not just a religious hobby for realists. it is the key to the survival of humanity. It is what keeps us in the game.
The Evidential Reformation (Term coined by Michael Dowd) is a movement based on the idea that the time has come for all of the religious world to replace belief with evidence based knowledge. Humanity has evolved to where reality itself has to be incorporated into religious doctrine and can no longer be shoved aside by faith.
The Evidential Reformation is the transition into Religion 3.0 where we have a world view that is based on the authority of evidence, what actually is real, rather than what one chooses to believe through faith. Religion 1.0 was the Authority of the elders, Religion 2.0 was the authority of scripture. We now know that our existence is driven by evolution and that the universe is about 13.82 billion years old. As young people leave the church in droves Religions that ignore evidence based knowledge will be Left Behind.
Many of you might be thinking, "But what about life on other planets? Surely with a trillion trillion planets out there somewhere there is intelligent life!" Yes those are big numbers and it seems intuitive that there would be, and maybe there is. But maybe there isn't. We just don't know.
Let's face it. Most of us who are into reality have watched a lot of science fiction and we are used to the idea that somewhere out there are alien civilizations that are as advanced and probably more advanced than we are. We envision running into them and exchanging technology, forming alliances to explore the universe, maybe even fooling around with their women. But really, are we not biased by wishful thinking?
Most scientists seem to agree the carbon based microbial life is going to be common. Microbes can live in harsh environments, maybe even survive in the cold vacuum of space. But what about advanced life? What about life like us? Are we common or are we rare? The more you look into it the more rare we seem to be.
This planet is like an oasis in an extremely violent universe and it has been relatively stable for the last 4 billion years. And that's even counting mass extinctions. In a billion years the sun will be so hot that it will boil off our oceans and melt the crust. Only the most extreme microbial life will remain if anything remains at all. A billion years seems like a long time, but it took us 4 billion years to evolve us. If evolution were 20% slower we would have been baked before we evolved.
Until we find out otherwise we should act as if we are alone and focus on living in right relationship to reality.
The elements for life have existed in the universe for 10 billion years. That means if it took 4 billion years to create us then it's possible that something else could be 6 billion years ahead of us. Even as big as this galaxy is if there were an advanced civilization it would only take a few hundred million years to completely colonize this galaxy. Advanced life should be everywhere, but it isn't. We have yet to detect any alien electromagnetic signals that would indicate the presence of advanced life.
It may be that advanced life is rare. Maybe one per galaxy. Maybe one in a million galaxies. Maybe we are it. There is a reasonable chance that we are the most advanced life in the universe, and if we blow it then that's it. The universe goes back to being a dumb universe.
If it turn out that we were it then wouldn't it be a shame if we blew it and got wiped out because we cut funding to NASA and some asteroid came along and wiped us out. How pathetic would that be? Until we know differently we should look at ourselves as a rare jewel in the universe and that we should respect humanity as something very precious that we should protect at all costs.
If it turns out that there is advanced life on other planets lets hope that they don't find us and decide to wipe us out. It might not be a good thing for us to encounter a civilization that could maybe turn us into an asteroid belt if they wanted to.
If there were advanced life on other planets then their purpose would be the same as ours - to be the mevhanism for reality to become self aware.
Evolution however is a property of the universe. Any advanced alien civilization would have the same purpose as us. In order to survive they have to live in right relationship to reality as well. A big asteroid would probably take them out as well. The universe evolves life. Life evolves intelligence. Intelligent like needs to always know more. Therefore our purpose for existing and their purpose for existing is the same. It's always evolve or die.
If there was an advanced civilization on another planet then what would their purpose be? What is their role in the universe? It would be exactly the same as our role - to be the mechanism for which reality becomes self aware. They would have a different perspective on it but it would be interesting to find another civilization and compare notes. What could we learn from them? What could they learn from us?
What is the meaning of meaning in the context of the universe. Does existence have value? What matters to Reality itself? Maybe nothing has meaning. Maybe nothing has value. Maybe nothing matters to Reality. Maybe we are just a roll of the dice that is no different than any other roll. To exist or not to exist - who cares? Why does it matter? Who is to say that any outcome is better than any other outcome? What does "better" even mean?
Does humanity just exist for no reason at all. Does it matter what I do with my life? Who is to say what is right and what is wrong? What does it mean for anything to matter. What makes something better than something else? Is survival really better than extinction? Wouldn't the world be better off if humans went extinct? Why should we care about what the Truth is? Who is to say what's important? Does importance even exist in the context of the universe? Why should we even ask why? What is it that wants to know? Is there value in knowing anything? Does Reality care if I exist? What does Reality want me to do?
What is knowledge? What is thought? Do I have free will? Do I have agency? Or - am I just a puppet in a deterministic universe acting out a script that has already been written? Is Reality itself real? Or are we just an app running on someone's cell phone in a higher plane of existence? Maybe this is just a dream? Maybe I'm just part of someone else's dream? Maybe I'm a brain in a vat? Maybe I'm just running code? Maybe the space aliens are controlling my mind?
What is this place? Why am I here? What am I supposed to do? Why am I alive? What is life? What does it mean to be aware - or not aware? Who are these other people who share existence with me? Are they like me. Should I care about them? Should they care about me?
And the biggest question of all. How did I end up in a world where I, Marc Perkel, own the Registered Trademark to the word REALITY and isn't that just a little sad?
So how do we answer these questions? Let's start with Reality itself. Let's start looking at the world and seeing what's going on.
The important question is - What does Reality Want?
Whatever this universe we live in is - this is Reality to us. So if this is a simulation and we are part of that simulation - then this is still our Reality. If we are a brain in a vat this is still reality to us. So if the universe isn't real then neither are we. So let's assume Reality is real. The question now is - what does Reality want? What is Reality itself trying to do?
At this point you might be questioning the question "What does Reality want to do?", because Reality itself doesn't have a brain and without a brain, or other information processing unit, the term "want" is meaningless. However human language is sometimes imprecise and humans tend to personify. What we are really talking about is the nature of the thing. Examples of this would be, "An apple wants to fall to the ground." "Plants want to grow towards the sun." We are really talking about natural laws and not something desiring something, which is a different kind of want.
Ever since the Big Bang Reality has been evolving. Starting out as pure energy and then forming particles, then atoms, then stars, then heavier elements, then planets, then life, and eventually us. As the evolutionary process continues the universe becomes more complex. In isolated areas such as here on this planet the universe has become very complex.
We are the mechanism through which Reality contemplates its own existence.
Evolution can be looked at as a rather simple process. Evolution is randomness that selects on survivability. That which survives is here, that which doesn't survive is not here. This simple process however created us and we have evolved to the point where we are beginning to be able to understand and contemplate the very processes that created us. Since we are a product of Reality evolving then we are the part of Reality that allows Reality to contemplate its own existence. Reality contemplates itself through us.
To understand understanding, we have to figure out what is doing the understanding. What is it that understands? What is it that is understood? The simple answer is, "I understand.It is me that's doing the understanding." in some contexts that answer is sufficient. But if you get more specific, isn't it the brain that understands? Isn't the body more of a biological robot that caries the brain around and supports it's functioning?
I think - therefore I am - a complex network of nerve cells forming a biological computer.
But that answer is too simplistic. The brain is a collection of nerve cells. So is it the nerve cells that understand? Not hardly. A nerve cell isn't complex enough to understand anything. It's really the collection of nerve cells forming a network that forms a biological computer that makes up our awareness and gives us agency. But - does that tell the whole story?
Consider this. A child is raised on a desert island where there are no other humans. Let's say the child is raised by wolves. What is that child's experience of Reality going to be like? What is that person going to understand? Not a whole lot. That person's existence would be about the same as any other animal. If the child were adopted by a tribe of chimpanzees the child's experience would be a little batter, because the child is part of a group. As a group - even a group of chimps - individuals have the collective knowledge of the tribe.
I think therefore I am. vs We think therefore we are.
Although we as individuals have understanding, how much of what we know is actually known by us individually rather than collectively? Do I know that the universe is 13.8 billion years old, or do WE know the universe is 13.8 billion years old. And if there are things that WE know rather than I know - what is the mechanism of collective understanding?
Just like our brains are a collection of neurons forming a biological computer, humans are more like individual computers forming a computer network. The internet as a computer network is a model that reflects in many ways how humans organize in societies and it helps us understand the function of society in collective understanding.
For most of the life of the universe advancements have been slow relying on "Traditional Evolution" which selects on survivability. It's a slow crude process that takes billions of years and leads to some amazingly great and amazingly poor engineering. But now we are self aware and we networked our abilities and we are now building things out of advanced materials. We are transitioning from traditional evolution to engineered evolution.
Engineered evolution is when we take control of the evolutionary function to get an outcome that we desire. We selectively breed animals and crops to turn them into creatures that are better to eat or do work for us. We also make tools and habitats out of advanced materials. All our technology is part of humanity. We don't hunt and kill with our bare hands or dig roots in the forest. We drive our cars to the grocery store. We use machinery to grow food in remote places and use ships and planes to bring it to us.
If we can control our evolution, what shall we choose to evolve into? How do we make the right choice?
And now we can synthesize DNA sequences and will soon be able to print custom life forms or design custom life forms. Soon we will be able to print custom humans with custom genetics. We will also be able to enhance these humans using advanced materials and electronics. We are coming into an age what we can control our own evolution. We can choose what we will become. But some choices will be better than other choices. How do we know if we made "the right choice"? And what does the right choice even mean?
Although war can not always be avoided, there is no honor or victory in war. Our world view is that war always represents the failure to achieve peace and it is always something to be ashamed of. War is to be remembered from the perspective of failure and as a lesson to learn to avoid war in the future. We in the Church of Reality understand - especially in this day of nuclear and biological weapons - that peace is not something that is optional, and that we have a responsibility to our fellow human beings to do whatever it takes to avoid war.
We must never be proud of war. War is always a failure to achieve peace.
The peoples of this planet are all united in the reality that we all share this world together. It is imperative to our existence and our development that we learn how to live together - how to share in a fair and equitable manner. We must all survive together and do whatever it takes to make it work out. We have to be smart - we have to be brave - and we have to be wise. We have to not only be understanding - but also to insure that others understand us.
Terrorism and torture are just plain wrong. There is a basic moral certainty that cuts across all religions and we in the Church of Reality join with the religions of the world who are in opposition to crimes of war. The Church of Reality stands for the advancement of civilization and that whenever possible we must preemptively adapt to a changing political, technological, and biological environment. It is part of our mission to help ensure the Peace.
We realize that there are people in the world who are dangerous to themselves and to others. But our solution is not to fight enemies but to evolve enemies into friends.
Not everything in a religion is about belief. Churches provide a framework on how to live. Not only what is right and wrong but also what to do on a day to day basis, a framework for living if you will. And Churches provide a support mechanism for their members and to provide charitable services for the greater community. It also provides a sense of community for its members so that people can socialize and exchange ideas. This community is both online and local. We need to have places for people to meet and activities for people to do together.
Community support is also an important task for the Church of Reality. When members of the community fall on hard times then members of the church need to form a support infrastructure to care for and comfort individuals in need. When people become ill they need to be cared for. We need to comfort the dying. To help resolve issues in relationships before they lead to divorce. To help families come together to raise and educate children. To help people deal with their emotional problems. And to do all this and other things like it in a way that promotes a good quality of life - social justice - and become the kind of community for which people can be proud of.
I remember being a young Jew and being taught about Moses leading the Jews out of Egypt, especially the events that led up to that. According to the story, God killed the first born male of all the Egyptian families. Being the first born and male - this was a sensitive issue for me. From my perspective they were saying that God would kill me if I had the wrong parents. I took a look at my parents and thought - Holy Fuck! - I'm in trouble!
The Jews had to mark their houses by killing a goat or a lamb and smearing the blood around the door so that when God came to kill children, he didn't accidentally kill the wrong ones. God is all powerful - but he's easily confused and needs to have things marked so that he doesn't make a mistake. And - God had to be appeased with animal sacrifices or he's going to come kill your children.
Now - if I told you there was this guy in the neighborhood who was going around slaughtering first born males of everyone who didn't have goats blood smeared around their door, we'd lock that guy up and make him the poster boy for the death penalty. But this is God we're talking about here who's the insane criminal. God - the all powerful creator of the universe - who knows everything - and loves us all - is also a mass murderer of children. Even at the age of 5 I wasn't buying it and I was living in a world where the adults were stupid scary people who were trying to force me to believe things that made absolutely no sense at all. Fortunately for me though I had parents who had their own lives screwed up so much that they didn't have it together enough to force this nonsense on me the way most kids were forced. And being a Jew wasn't nearly as insane as what the Catholic kids in the neighborhood went through. I'm afraid of how I might have turned out if I actually bought any of this nonsense. But every day parents are abusing children by filling their heads with this sort of religious nonsense.
The difference between evolution and Creationism is that evolution is real and Creationism is not real. Creationism is based on the Bible that says that God created the world in 6 days about 10,000 years ago. Clearly the world was not created in 6 days about 10,000 years ago, so therefore the Bible is just plain wrong. If the world were merely 10,000 years old then how do you explain the dinosaurs that are millions of years old? We've discovered life fossils that date back billions of years. Even the skeletons of modern humans date back before the time of Adam and Eve.
If we were to believe the Bible, then we would have to believe the Earth was created before the stars, which is the wrong order. If the stars were created 10,000 years ago, we wouldn't be able to see stars that are more than 10,000 light years away. That's because if a star was further away than 10,000 light years, the light from that star wouldn't have got here yet. Our galaxy alone is about 100,000 light years across. If the Bible were true, we wouldn't be able to see but 1/10th the way across our own galaxy. We surely wouldn't be able to see other galaxies or galactic clusters or know that the universe is expanding.
Our modern technology has proved the Bible wrong. That means that if there is a God, he didn't write the Bible and the Bible is not his word. If the Bible were the word of God and the Bible is wrong, then God is wrong. And if God can't be wrong, then the Bible, which is wrong, can't be the word of God.
Men who lived thousands of years ago wrote the Bible. The authors had limited knowledge of the nature of the universe and wrote the Bible based on what they believed at the time. They didn't know the Earth was round and that it orbited the Sun, which is a star among billions of stars in the galaxy, which is but one galaxy in billions of galaxies that have existed for billions of years. To them, the world was flat. There was up and there was down and God lived in the sky. They didn't know the world was round and there was no such thing as "up". They didn't know that the sky was a thin layer of gas that surrounds the surface of this planet. We have been to the sky and we have been above the sky and God isn't living there.
There are things we know and things we don't know. However we can make a best guess to take a position based on the information we have available. The Church of Reality has already taken the position that God does not exist, and that we are going to maintain that position until God comes out of hiding into objective reality.
As to the afterlife, all scientific evidence suggests that we are our brains and that when our brains cease to function, we cease to exist. Until someone comes back from the "other side" in a way that objective observers can document, we will stick with this position. The belief in life after death is a denial of our mortality.
There is perhaps a way to escape death, but that involves investing in the technologies that could prolong life indefinitely. We might actually be close to reaching that point, and for those who want to live forever, you might want to invest in developing the science that can make it possible.
Although people die, they still survive in a number of ways. If they have children, then their genes are passed on, cut by 50% in a mix with someone else's genes, which then divides in half with each subsequent generation. Additionally, the moral and cultural values we teach our children, those that are actually learned, are also passed on.
Google is the afterlife in the Church of Reality. Your immortality can be crudely assessed by the number of online articles about you 100 years after you die.
In the Church of Reality, we become part of the Tree of Knowledge - the sum total of all human understanding. If we have accomplished something significant in our lives that is worth remembering, then our legacy will be passed on to future generations. I believe that the preservation of one's thoughts and ideas represents the best form of immortality because it is what represents you, who you are, how you lived, and what you contributed. As the First One of the Church of Reality, I hope that this church will be my legacy. I hope that others will take what I started and build it into something great. And I want others to share in the creation of what I hope will be the religion of the future.
Christianity is a "we're better than you" religion that openly disdains all other religions, including other Christians. It creates a highly exaggerated sense of self-importance that is sustained by the oppression and judgment of others. Christians see the world as a battlefield where God is at war with the Devil. The adversaries are fighting this war through human surrogates with Christians as the good guys and everyone else as the bad guys. And since this is a holy war, all is fair. It is ok for Christians to be dishonest in order to gain power to fight for Jesus.
For example, if a Christian were to kill me for posting this web page, publicly the churches would condemn it as murder and wrong. However, in their hearts they would be thankful that some one killed me because I am an instrument of Satan and therefore deserve to die. I would be an enemy killed in battle. At a minimum, they are out there praying for my soul, because I am lost, and they are found.
From the perspective of a non-believer, I see Christians in general as self-righteous, hate-filled, and indulging in behavior that is very bizarre. If someone is speaking in tongues, either God is speaking through them, or they are so mentally ill that they are hallucinating that God is speaking through them. Is God really speaking through them? Well, if God is all powerful then can't he speak for himself? If not, God has a problem. If so, then the Christian who thinks he's speaking for God has a problem. The bottom line is, Christianity is a cult, actually, thousands of related cults, and as a culture, it sucks.
It is well recognized by all but the most fanatical fundamentalist bible scholars that Paul, writing between approximately 54 C. E. an 65 C.E., was not a “witness to Jesus.” By his own admission, he saw Jesus “in a vision” while on the road to Damascus. This Jesus was a purely mythical, “spiritual Christ,” not in any sense a human being Christ. Paul “received” this Jesus through a kind of divine revelation. I believe that Doherty explains this sort of “Jesus” best when he says that the message Paul received, “Šwas about a heavenly Son of God who was both an intermediary between God and the world, and a Savior figure. He was variously called Jesus, or Yeshua (meaning ‘Yahweh Saves’ in Hebrew), the Christ (Greek for the Hebrew “Mashiach,” or Messiah, meaning ‘Anointed One’), and the Son. Some looked upon this new Son of God as a Reveler who bestowed saving knowledge of God, others as one who had undergone a sacrificial death and a resurrection. [In another heavenly realm] All manner of apostles like Paul were going about preaching this divine being and often not agreeing among themselves about him; indeed, they could be at each others’ throats, as certain passages in Paul’s letters revealed. This Son and Savior was not identified with a recent human man or placed in an earthly setting, much less given a ministry of teaching and miracle-working in Galilee.
[Paul knew no details of the yet to be written, gospel ‘historical’ Jesus.] Instead, he was a heavenly deity who had done his redeeming work in the supernatural dimension.” (The Jesus Puzzle p. 5.)
This kind of thinking is very difficult for the modern mind. Remember that since every reader of this paper was born he or she has been constantly bombarded—well, except when you were in your church, synagogue, or mosque—with cause and effect, logical, scientific thinking. For the residents of Galilee two thousand years ago, however, nothing could have been more natural. The whole culture and the entire “civilized world” was saturated with this way of thinking. It was, as Doherty explains, “The view shared by a whole range of pagan salvation cults, each of which had its own savior god who had performed deeds in the mythical world. Like Paul’s Christ, savior gods such as Attis and Osiris had been killed; like Paul’s Christ, Osiris had been buried (after being dismembered); like Christ on the third day, Adonis and Dionysos had been resurrected from death. All these things were not regarded as historical; they had taken place in the world of myth and higher reality.” (Doherty, op cit. p. 16.)
In summary, all of the parts of the New Testament attributed to a probably historical Paul are of no help at all in establishing a “historical” Jesus, since they never speak of such a person.
We are an activist religion. We don't just find problems - we solve problems. We are committed to coming up with solutions and take responsibility for bringing new concepts into reality. We make sure that the job is done right. We are a community, and we do the work needed to make the community work. We go out and learn, we try to understand, and we spend a lot of time thinking. We give of ourselves for the common good of all people. In the Spirit of the Tree - our shared knowledge - we support sharing. It is our duty to look around and figure out how to make it all work.
The Church of Reality is committed to never becoming a cult. We exist to serve humanity, not to rule it. Our commitment to reality really is real and needs to be protected. We therefore ask for anti-cult groups to scrutinize us and ensure that we stay on the right track. We will not become like the Scientologists and Moonies or any other mind-control group and we not only want to succeed, but we want to show that we have been independently evaluated to build a cult safe reputation.
If you are an anti-cult group, investigate us. If we are doing something wrong or even look like we have a flaw that might lead to cult type thinking, we want to know about it. We are always looking for ways to improve ourselves.
The Church of Reality finds that the American led war in Iraq is an unjust war.
The American and British government fabricated false evidence to start the war. The war is a fraud.
The war lacks United Nations support.
Iraq was invaded, conquered, and is now being occupied by invading nations who are attempting to establish a US controlled puppet government.
The United States committed and continues to commit war atrocities against the civilian population of Iraq including the use of torture, rape, chemical weapons, and random murder.
The US refuses to give prisoners access to the Red Cross.
The US refuses to give prisoners due process of law.
The US maintains a network of secret prisons where people are tortured.
The war in Iraq serves no great purpose.
The war is against the interests of world peace, positive evolution, and the war advances the cause of strengthening Muslim terrorism and religious hatred.
The war is primarily a religious war between Christians and Muslims that have been slaughtering each other for thousands of years. There are also elements of theft of oil resources as the real interest behind this war.
The Church of Reality declares this war to be an unjust cause. Realists as always have a duty to make their own individual decision about the Iraq war but the Church of Reality has determined that this war is so obviously wrong that it is issuing an edict against it.
Nation-states that would draft Realists into military service against their will to fight in this war, be warned: we are not on your side. This war is so unjust that Realists should actively undermine the integrity of the fighting force you are commanded to serve in. I want to make it clear to the United States of America that you don't want Realists to be part of this conflict because Realist consider you the enemy of peace and that a Realist's first loyalty is to the Sacred Principles.
Different nation-states have different death penalties. Iran, for example, allows women to be stoned to death for improper sex. This is barbaric behavior. Most of the civilized world with the exception of the United States has denounced the death penalty.
Of the nations that still practice the death penalty, much of the intellectual justification to the community of nations is that "America is doing it - so it must be acceptable." America can be seen as a justification for other countries to kill people for religious transgressions. It raises the question if America's death penalty is an indirect cause for unjust executions in other nations, and if America renounces the death penalty, that other nations could be pressured into stopping their unjust executions as well. The world would be a better place if America set an example of wisdom rather than an example of revenge.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Religious rights are rights that various nation states recognize as being superior to state laws. Individuals who are members of religions are given exceptions to the law regarding specific religious customs. States try to avoid forcing individuals to be required to do things that the individual considers to be "sinful" or in violation of one's conscience. Many laws have a religious exemption that allows people of specific religions the right to not comply with the law or to have special privileges such as days off of work for religious holidays. Muslims are allowed to wear head scarves. Jehovah's Witnesses can not be compelled to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Religious people have the right to practice their religion.
Religious rights were once thought of as applying only to people who believe in a God. But that isn't the case. Religious rights apply to people of all religions whether or not your religion believes in a deity or not. All religions includes atheist religions like Buddhism and Realism. It doesn't matter what your religion believes or what fictional deities it chooses. In the eyes of the law Jesus and the Flying Spaghetti Monster are equal.
Religious rights are based on the doctrine of the religion that you are a member of. These laws generally do not apply to people who are not members of a religion. The nation states seem to give preference to people who are members of a group as opposed to people who have their own private philosophy. As a member of a religion your religious claim is based on their documented religious laws. So if you are an individual making a claim for a religious right then you need to be a member of a religion that has a written creed that the state can reference that shows that your religious claim is actually supported by the religion that you are a member of.
Our Kernel gives Realists a fuller set of religious rights than that of any other religion.
The Church of Reality has a very rich doctrine for which to draw upon for religious freedom. We are not limited by the words of ancient text that were written by people who lived thousands of years ago. Our Kernel is a modern doctrine that is a dynamic and evolving doctrine that is expanding, fixing it's mistakes, improving, and is able to adjust to a changing world. In the future if cloning technology becomes commonplace then we will have doctrine relating to cloning. You would be hard pressed to find cloning in the Bible. but when the time comes the Kernel will cover it.
Our doctrine is based on the right of the individual to pursue the understanding of reality as it really is and to be part of a community that is friendly to such a pursuit. Our Sacred Missions and our Sacred Principles give us a very broad religious doctrine with a lot of specific religious protections. Our doctrine is far more specific than other religions and details issues in the modern world. It is based on a logical construction so that even if an issue isn't specifically covered it can more easily be logically constructed from existing principles. This is important because a Realist going into a court of law to assert a religious right has far more to work with than other religions. The strength of our Kernel empowers then individual to assert religious rights under law.
The Church of Reality condemns the unprovoked attack by Israel against the nation of Lebanon as a crime against humanity. This undeclared war against the new sovereign democracy of Lebanon is unjustified and we urge the free-thinking people of the world to speak out and condemn this act and to resist accepting an artificial justification for what is essentially an act of terrorism.
Lebanon is not Hezbollah. Israel is not attacking Hezbollah only. Israel is destroying the nation of Lebanon. This condemnation is focused on what Israel is doing to Lebanon as an innocent third party and the unprovoked attacks on Lebanese civilians destruction of the country's infrastructure. This is also not an endorsement of Islamic terrorism which is actually a far greater threat than Israel's insanity. Israel's acts only make their enemies stronger and Israel is acting against its own cause and against peace. Israel is increasing the hate and you don't achieve peace through injustice.
The human population is organized into societies. We are a community that includes many levels of organization. But ultimately everyone on the planet is a member of the human community. Especially in this age of the Internet and world wide communication, it is clear that every person on the planet and of every culture has the right to live a quiet peaceful life and has the responsibility to respect the rights and liberties of others. A citizen of Lebanon and a citizen of Israel are equal and neither one has any greater rights than the other. Both have a responsibility to maintain peace and respect the right of others to live and thrive in the world.
A war is like a sickness that infects the soul of the human race itself. Every war affects every person on the planet and has a cost to humanity itself.
War is always wrong although it is sometimes necessary. War always represents failure and is something that, even when justified, is a shameful act. War must always be an act of last resort after all other options have been tried. It should only be contemplated as a defense and with the consensus of the world community. We are all part of the human race and although we are individual life-forms, we all are part of a greater life-form, humanity, and war is a sickness within humanity itself. Every war affects every person on the planet and takes a toll on the positive evolution of all of us. Thus we all are paying the price for every war that we allow to occur. To start an unjust war it to commit a crime against humanity itself.
Rabbis burning Israeli Flag in Protest of Zionism
In this instance, Israel has attacked the nation of Lebanon without provocation. Israel has destroyed Lebanon's infrastructure. Israel has targeted and destroyed its roads, bridges, airports, utilities, power plants and ports. Israel is bombing the civilian populations without regard to the innocent lives that they are destroying. To attack a nation in this way is an attack on every single person in the nation of Lebanon who have done nothing at all to justify this attack.
The government of Lebanon is a new democracy moving away from Syrian domination and struggling to form a secular society where people from all cultures can live in peace. Within it's borders and part of it's culture is Hezbollah which is an enemy of Israel and was formed in response to a 1982 incursion by Israel. In condemning Israel the Church of Reality is not endorsing or justifying the acts of Islamic terrorists. We recognize however that Lebanon is not Hezbollah and for Israel to attack the nation of Lebanon because Hezbollah kidnapped two soldiers is almost as insane as America attacking Iraq over 9-11. The kidnapping of two people is no justification for a war and certainly not a justification to destroy a third party nation that was not involved in the offense against Israel.
Israel claims that the attack is justified because Lebanon failed to eliminate the Hezbollah threat. However, the current government is a new democracy that hasn't been around long enough to have the power to stop Hezbollah. Hezbollah is not just a hate group that exists to hate Jews and eliminate Israel. Hezbollah exists in part as a defense to Israeli aggressions, to defend the population from acts of Israeli terrorism. To the extent that Israel uses terrorism and shows a complete disrespect for the lives of the people of all other nations, it is their fault in part that they are hated in the region. It is attacks like this that fuel groups like Hezbollah and even if they kill every member of that group, they will cause an even bigger group to be formed in response. War breeds war and hate breeds hate and Israel's crime is as much a crime against their own nation as it is against the world community. The worst thing that can happen to Israel is that they are successful in this aggression because it will cost them the respect of the world community.
The life of a citizen of Lebanon is just as important as the life of a citizen of Israel.
Israel has chosen not to take their cause to the United Nations and not to ask for the consensus of the world community, and not to lobby the world community for assistance to craft a peace based solution. Israel apparently feels that it is above such rules and that it can do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and that it is above international law. But when a nation defies international law, they pay a price in the long run, because some day Israel will need the world community and we will remember this and take it into account when evaluating if religious states like Israel and Iran are a good idea. Israel is proving that a religious state doesn't work because it allows it's citizens to enjoy the illusion that their people have superior rights to everyone else on the planet.
Israel is not above international law. Like every other nation they have to get a consensus of the world community before going to war.
If the kidnapping of merely two people were justification for a war, then is Canada justified in declaring war on Israel for the killing of eight Canadian citizens in their unprovoked war on Lebanon? Why are eight Canadians worth less that two Israelis? Why are two Israelis lives worth more than thousands of citizens of Lebanon? Why are two Israelis lives more valuable that the other Israelis who have died in this conflict? When you consider the price of this aggression, it is clear that there is no positive outcome of Israel's actions.
Israel risks widening the war in that other nations might come in on the side of Lebanon. In a world where there are already too many people trying to start World War III, Israel's act is a crime against all people and it's attack is essentially a terrorist threat against every other country in the region. Israel is also alienating the sane peace-loving Jewish community and Israel's act of war is splitting Judaism into two camps that are at odds with each other. In this case the Israeli Jews are on the wrong side of justice.
There is nothing special about the nation of Israel. When Israel is wrong, it is no different than is any other nation is wrong.
Israel should be a beacon of peace, not a beacon of war. If a nation would demand of the world that it has a right to exist, then it has to respect that other people of the world have the same rights. There is nothing special about being a Jew or an Israeli and Israel is no different than any other nation on the planet. There is nothing at all that gave Israel a superior standing to any other people on the planet and Israel is subject to the same laws as everyone else. Israel is not above scrutiny. When Israel is wrong they are subject to the same condemnation as any other nation that is wrong.
The Church of Reality declares Israel's cause to be unjust and asks members to stop supporting Israel.
Now then, for the above stated reasons, the Church of Reality issues this edict condemning the government of Israel and does hereby declare this war to be an unjust war. The Church of Reality finds that Israel is engaged in an act of terrorism against the population of the nation of Lebanon. We urge the voices of reason in the world to denounce this war and to take whatever steps necessary to stop Israel and to act to build the peace. War does not lead to peace, it leads to more war. These people have been fighting for thousands of years and if the human race is going to evolve forward, we need to learn how to build the peace and eliminate the violence and hatred that fuels perpetual war.
Where does right and wrong come from. What makes one choice better than another choice? Many religious people fear that without the guidance of an omnipotent deity that all morality would go away. They fear that without God that society would deteriorate into a Darwinian "survival of the fittest" ethic where the strong males kill the other males so they can breed more females. They fear that the reality based world has no answers to where right and wrong come from.
Morality is important to a society. It serves to be a guide in determining what laws of society are fair and just. We all know that murder is wrong, but why is it wrong? In the religious world they have an answer, "Because God says so!" But in the reality based world we also know murder is wrong. But because we are the Church of Reality we have to have a reason to explain why, and that reason has to be objective and not just someone's opinion or some vague explanation that can't be proven. We are a reality based religion and we are therefore subject to Scrutiny. But fortunately, we have an answer.
Our morality goes back to our root axiom - the pursuit of the understanding of reality by humans has value. We have supported this root axiom by showing that this is necessary for the human race to continue to exist. A moral system is the agreement of a society as to what is right and wrong. You therefore need to have a society for a moral system to exist. If we become extinct then our morality goes extinct with us. Morality therefore must lead to survival.
If morality depends on survival and Survival depends on Positive Evolution, and positive evolution depends on the continued progress humanity understanding reality, then right and wrong, morality, is a function of what helps humanity evolve forward. Morality is about what helps humanity understand reality better tomorrow than we do today.
So the reason murder is wrong is because if we go around killing each other then we won't be able to cooperate and build space telescopes so that we can pear back to the beginning of time. We won't be able to contemplate contemplation if people are running around stealing all our stuff.
In order to evolve forward we need a safe stable society where people can work together to expand the Tree of Knowledge. In order to do that we need schools, roads, power, clean air and water, good governments, just laws, world peace, and a fair and cooperative environment where we all can thrive in. These core beliefs of the Church of Reality lead to a basis for morality that is more accurate than that of deity based belief systems. People converting to a realist perspective need not worry that right and wrong are going away.
Snot Theory is a metaphor for theories that don't stand up to scientific Scrutiny. It's used in a response to the argument, "No one knows the answer so you can't prove my answer isn't right."
Snot Theory is the hypothesis that the Big Bang was caused by a deity sneezing and that the universe was created out of snot. Of course we all know it's snot true. So if someone makes a "God of the Gaps" argument or postulates a theory without any logical support, we would call their idea Snot Theory.
The first think to understand about our evolution is that it is not our evolution. It is the evolution of the universe. The universe evolved into us. We are the universe evolving. We are a dust particle that exists for an instant. Yet as small and short lived as we are we evolved to the point that we can comprehend the universe. And since we are the universe, the universe comprehends itself through us. We are the essence of reality becoming self aware through us.
It seems to be that evolution s a property of the universe. The formula for evolution is randomness with selection on survival. That which continues stays in reality. That which fails to survive leaves reality. Forever separated from existence. That creates an equation to create complexity.
Energy turns in matter. Matter fuses in stars to create heavier elements. Stars explode creating more elements. New stars are born. Planets form in the accretion disks. The third planet becomes the Earth. Life forms and evolves into bacteria. One day a a single bacteria tries to eat a single archaea and they fuse and become the first eucarya. And from that single individual all plants, animals, and fungus evolved.
What are we really? Our cells are individual life forms. Yet do I see myself as a community of cells, 90% of which are not human? Of course not. I am a person. And I'm self aware. At least my mind think I am. But am I really self aware? Do I know what I am?
My hands appear solid but in reality - they aren't. We're made of atoms and atoms are separated by great distances. Over 99% of us if empty space. Matter itself started out as energy. We're photons and force fields. Electromagnetism holds the dots together. For all we know this might all be a simulation.
The idea that reality is a simulation is unlikely. But what if we found out we aren't really individuals. That we are cells in some greater being. In fact we are. You are not an individual. You are a member of the hive. So fully integrated that even your thoughts are not your own. And - I can demonstrate this is so.
As you read these words these are not your words. These are not your thoughts that you are thinking. You are thinking my thoughts. My thoughts in your brain. But they aren't my thoughts either. I'm just organizing thoughts from other people, things I watched, things I read. We think that the universe started with a "big bang" but I don't know that. It's not my idea and truth told, I'm not smart enough to understand that. That knowledge is in some elses mind. I know it through a network of trust. I am a member of the world community. I am a cell. My thoughts are but one voice in a chorus.
But to call all of humanity a single organism ignores all the other organisms on the planet that creates the biological community that sustains us. They evolved along with us. We all came from the same place. We all came from a little piece of pond scum.
If the Bible is the "Word of God" and God is perfect then the Bible must be perfect. One would have the expectation that someone who created the universe would have a pretty good idea about how it all worked and that his books would be accurate. Well ... not so, as it turns out. The Bible is full of serious errors. So many errors in fact that it makes you wonder where God went to school. What amazes me is how many people believe this - which shows you the sorry state of the human race.
First - the world was not created in 6 days. It just didn't happen that way. But - you say - to God a day is like 1000 years. Well - come on! If God is omnipotent and he's writing a book for people to read and understand - don't you think that God knows how long a day is? I mean - doesn't one have to assume that God isn't stupid? So - even if a day is 1000 years that takes the age of the universe up to what? 12,000 years? Where did the other 15 billion years go?
We are seeing stars and galactic clusters out there that are 10 billion light years away. That means that what we are seeing came from stars 10 billion years ago. That's how long the light takes to get here. if the universe were merely 12,000 years old, we couldn't see any stars that were more than 12,000 light years away.That would be less that 100th of our own galaxy and we would never see any other galaxies because the next closest galaxy is 2.2 million light years from here. The Bible is wrong. End of story.
But - you might say - maybe God just created the light in transit to make it look like there were stars out there older than 12,000 years to fool all those scientists with no faith. Well - besides the conclusion that God must hate smart people - if God did something to mislead people - if God created light to fake the age of stars - doesn't that make God a liar? Are you calling God a liar?
So - the Bible is wrong - what does that mean. Well - if there is a God - then he didn't write the Bible. Perhaps it's a forgery meaning that God is going to be pissed at all the churches. Or - most likely - God doesn't exist and it's all just one big fraud. Bingo! Sorry to burst your bubble but it's all just one big lie.
The Bible also has creating in the wrong order. The stars came before the Earth - God has it backwards. Then there is Noah and the Ark Story. Highest mountains are 27,000 feet - 40 days and 40 nights - that's 25 feet of rain an hour. That's one hell of a rain! And two of every species on a big wooden boat. All because God lost his temper and had to destroy the Earth. You would have though he would have seen that coming. God really has a temper problem and could use some violence counseling. He really needs to control his anger better.
Then there's the Tower of Babel. These guys thought they would build a tower to climb up to Heaven and mess with God. At some point in the construction God started to get worried about that and he had to put a stop to it before they succeeded. So God changed all their languages so they couldn't talk to each other.
Think that would work? God has never had any experience with a San Francisco construction crew where you pick up a bunch of Mexicans on Army Street and put them to work. They figure out what to do and how to get paid. And - considering the time - how high was the Tower of Babel? How high can you build a building out of wood rock and mud? How high was it compared to our modern steel and concrete buildings? Why didn't God stop the construction of the World Trade Towers? (Oh - he did!) We've been in outer space and looking down at the Earth and God is not in the atmosphere. So - why was he threatened by a tower? See - doesn't make any sense when you think about it. (Although thinking about it is the work of the Devil.)
As to evolution, evolution is science. We have the bones of creatures living millions of years ago that are the links between different forms of life. Bones exist that link us humans with our common ancestors that we share with other primates. In fact we have unearthed many civilizations that go back further than 10,000 years and predate Adam and Eve. And these discoveries actually exist and can be measured. We know them to be real.
Evolution is happening right now. Farmers have been using evolution for thousands of years to breed new and better farm animals and crops. The corn we eat today is very different than the corn that was raised by the ancient Egyptians. Today's cattle are very different from cows a few hundred years ago. The difference is that farmers controlled the breading to select the best individuals and to cause them to reproduce instead of the inferior ones. We have taken control of evolution and used it to our benefit.
Do we know everything about evolution? No, we don't. But we know a great deal, and we're learning more every day. As we pursue science and research, we are expanding our knowledge of the reality of the universe and the world around us. This is real knowledge about the way that the world actually is. Knowledge that has come from scientific discovery rather than the mythology of past and primitive civilizations.
The pursuit of reality the way it really is is not for the timid. Reality takes courage. It takes more courage to stand up to an unjust cause than it does to die in a war. People are herd animals. We want to be part of a community. It is one of our survival strategies that the human race evolved. Much of our information that we rely upon is part of the Tree of Knowledge. But what if a culture has a strongly held world view that is not only wrong, but dangerous? A world view like the world is going to be destroyed in our lifetime? There is a lot of pressure to go with the flow, but going with the flow is not the way of reality. We are committed to what is real, not what is popular.
Realists can expect some persecution for their views. Fortunately in most of the world at present Realists are no longer burned alive for expressing scientific fact. However in most countries it's hard to get elected to public office without giving lip service to the invisible cloud being. The Human brain likes a stable comfortable reality and when one upsets an axiom it causes a lot of mental anguish. This is true not only in religion, but science. The idea that humans have a 98.5% genetic match with monkeys is very disturbing to some people. We want to believe in flat space and linear time and people like Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking are just disruptive trouble makers. They make us rethink everything.
Change is disruptive and evolution isn't always pretty. Reality isn't always pleasant and it is far easier to go along to get along. Everyone is comfortable and then someone comes along and speaks the truth and you know they are right but you just don't want to have to deal with it. It takes courage to go against the flow, but if you make a true commitment to reality the way it really is, then that's often what you have to do.
It also takes courage to realize you are wrong because facing reality might have a personal cost. This is what keeps people in cults. They are integrated into a community and have a place in an artificial society. But then they realize it's all bullshit. That means they have to leave the cult. If the person isn't ready to leave the cult then the mind will play tricks on itself to keep the person from realizing a truth that would be obvious to someone who wasn't in the cult.
Often bad things are allowed to happen because people fail to speak out to stop them. To be silent when one should speak can become an endorsement. A Realist has to be prepared to pay a personal price to stand up for what is real because if we don't then we allow others to take reality away from the Tree of Knowledge and humanity is diminished. Realism is a religion of courage for without courage reality cannot be meaningfully pursued.
By adopting the name "Church of Reality" we are dedicating ourselves to solving the puzzle of how to create a religion that is based on reality. They say it can't be done, but we say it can and must be done. We accept the task of creating a religion that provides all the community services that other religions provide, while staying true to the principles of science and logic. We accept the axiom that this is possible and we dedicate ourselves to the seemingly impossible task of making it work.
Christians have problems talking about us non-christians as being evil and controlled by Satan, but they scream Christian persecution every time someone like me tells the truth about their religion. They can say I'm condemned to burn in Hell because I'm a filthy sinner, but I'm not supposed to say Christianity is a dangerous mind cult that leads to delusional behavior. It's ok for them to envision a world rid of the non-Christian heathens, but I'm not supposed to envision a world where people have figured out what a stupid belief system Christianity is, and it goes away like the belief that the world is flat went away.
My religion supports free speech and the free exchange of ideas. As I said, even though I believe that Christianity is a cult, people have the freedom to be part of that cult. But I'm tired of being shoved around by Christian bigots who would oppress my freedom to talk about reality the way it really is. Christianity sucks. It's a piss poor religion, and I'm tired of dealing with these in-your-face assholes who mistakenly believe that they are God's chosen people.
By way of amplifying the above point, what I mean is that, normally, a very well-known historical person—even one existing as long as two thousand years ago—would certainly be much better known to historians than is Jesus. For example, we know much more about Alexander the Great, who lived 200 years before the Jesus character is said to have lived.
Let’s examine just a few points of reference that one might reasonably be expected to know about a person whose influence was so great that it literally change the course of history over the next two millenium.
Looks? No one in the entire bible gives any definitive description of Jesus whatsoever. He is depicted in artistic works, ranging from the ninth century up to modern times, as everything from being rather short with a “male pattern baldness problem” to the tall, handsome Nordic Jesus with the neatly trimmed beard we all met in Sunday School. Secular scholar, Dr. William Harwood, an advocate of a “historical nobody” who served as a basis of the mythical Jesus, believes that Jesus was, “an odd looking man, balding, stooped, with joined eyebrows, and approximately 4 ft 6 in tall” (Mythology’s Last Gods, p. 63). Enough said.
Birth date? Biblical scholars of all stripes disagree as to the date of the mythical Jesus’ birth. Dates range from about 4 BCE (the one most often quoted) to about 7 CA.
Birthplace? The bible says Bethlehem. However, Jesus is constantly referred to as “Jesus of Nazareth.” Scholars now understand that this was probably a linguistic confusion and perhaps an early mistranslation. Jesus was a “Nazarene,” the title of a sect, not a name having geographical associations. Thus, as G. A. Wells explains, “‘Jesus the Nazarene’ is equivalent to, say, ‘Henry the Quaker’ or ‘George the Methodist.’” (Wells, Did Jesus Exist, p. 147.) Furthermore, modern archeology has established that there was no such city as Nazareth in the first century. Dr. Harwood, mentioned above, argue strongly for the city of Capurnaum as a probable birth city.
Personal character and/or moral worthiness? Although we heard all about the loving, compassionate Jesus in church, and how we ought to “turn the other cheek,” we were not given the quotations that urged his followers to bring those that would not have me for their leader and “slay them before me.” (Luke 19: 27.) We were told not to lie. However, we read about how Jesus lied when it suited him. (See Mattill, A. J. Sweet Jesus, p. 103) We remember the part about not stealing, but we heard nothing about Jesus’ habit of stealing pigs, wheat, donkeys, cash, cows, olive oil, and figs. (op. cit. p. 31-33.)
Perhaps more critical than all of the above inconsistencies and silences is the confusion about what, exactly, was J.C.’s central message? The problem of discerning a “central message” is confounded not because there isn’t one, but because there are too many. If one asks the average Christian what was Jesus’ essential message to us, they look at you as if you must be the stupidest person they have ever met. Then, they explain patiently that, “God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son to die for us so as to atone for our sins, and that if you would simply believe in him, you could have a sort of second life, ever-lasting, in a place called heaven.” Now, at first you must try to ignore the sheer imbecility of what you just heard, and ask a few follow-up questions. You may ask something like, “Well, how can I ‘believe on him’ as the bible phrases it, when I am not clear about his full message and his teachings?” The Christian has a ready answer. “You can read the bible and there you will learn all about his wonderful message to us.”
“I already did that,” you might say, “ but then I became even more confused.” As mentioned above, there seems to be hundreds of messages, often with conflicting ideas and pronouncements. You might also add that you were a bit confused as to whether you should pay more attention to Peter’s Jewish ‘works-based’ Christianity, or to Paul’s Gentile ‘faith-based’ Christianity. You confess further confusion when you read about the early Gnostic Christian’s ‘knowledge’ (Gnosis) based Christianity. Despite all your reading, you say, you are still “unclear on the concept.” At this point the Christian will generally say something like, “Jesus loves you anyway” and walk away.
The summary point here is that because of the great amount of hopelessly conflicting information and the lack of any definitive information on everything about Jesus—his looks, lineage, biography, nature (three in one; one in three?), character, moral worthiness, message, etc.—it is clear, at least to this writer, that there is simply no one underneath this great pile of b.s. to see.
The Church of Reality has determined that the theory of "Intelligent Design" is false science. The theory that says that complexity can not just happen and requires an intelligent designer is really just Creationism repackaged as science for the purpose of trying to sneak religious doctrine into science classes. It is a plot cooked up by the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture, a religious organization that is pretending to be a science institution. Their cult has come up with a plan they call The Wedge Strategy to fraudulently fabricate false scientific authority to justify it's inclusion in science to be taught along with scientific facts like Evolution which really is real science.
The children of Reality shall not be forced to endure the teachings of false science disguised as religion and it is appropriate for Realists to pull their children out of science classes where religious doctrine is presented as science. Intelligent Design is the religious doctrine of young earth creationists who are trying to use science to teach the Book of Genesis from the Bible.
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
The world renown scientist Stephen Hawking recently revealed that Pope John Paul II once told scientists they should not study the beginning of the universe because it was the work of God. The Church of Reality's position is the opposite. The Church of Reality encourages the exploration of the beginning of the universe. We want Stephen Hawking to figure out how the universe began. We therefore issue this edict to recognize Stephen Hawking's accomplishments in Theoretical Physics and Cosmology and to bless his work and his contribution to the Tree of Knowledge, and we say to Stephen, go for it dude! Stephen Hawking is a true explorer who will be remembered for his contributions to the exploration of reality.
Besides, if God existed then why not study creation? Perhaps the Pope was afraid of what Stephen Hawking would find? Perhaps the Pope is showing a lack of faith here? We in the Church of Reality are not afraid of the truth.
When one embarks on creating a religion with the name Church of Reality one can not rely on arbitrary subjective assumptions that reflect the preference of a single individual. The Church of Reality must - by definition - be based on something that is objective. We have accepted the burden of having to show our work. We can't just arbitrarily declare something to be true. We have to support it. We have to stand up to Scrutiny. In the Church of Reality the Root Axiom is what gives meaning meaning. It's the logical basis to separate right from wrong and form the basis for Morality.
Our Root Axiom is that to Exist it better that to not exist.
Our Root Axiom is that to exist is better than to not exist. By continuing to exist we don't mean as an individual, or as in eternal life. What we mean is that it is better that humanity continues to avoid extinction. That humanity is not Left Behind.
That in itself can be questioned as an arbitrary value judgment. One might ask why it is better for humanity to exist than to become extinct? And that would be a fair question for which we offer this justification.
Our first justification is that the opinion to exist is rigged in favor of existence. Those who exist get to vote. Those who don't exist don't get to vote. We humans are also a creation of evolution. Our ancestors did whatever it took to exist. This who failed to exist were Left Behind. Because of our method of creation we are pre-programmed by evolution to favor existence over nonexistence. Since the Church of Reality is about the understanding of reality by humans we have to incorporate our human nature into the equation.
Some might say that the Earth or the Universe would be better off without us. Maybe if we were gone the cockroaches will evolve into something better than we are. We just don't know. But the Church of Reality was created by humans for humans and in order to accomplish our mission we have to Stay in the Game. Thus for humans to continue to exist is better than humans becoming extinct is true in the context of how the Church of Reality is defined.
Reality is the story of everything that exists. We have to continue to exist to be part of the Story of Reality
Reality itself is about what exists. Without existence there would be no reality. Therefore a Church of Reality must accept existence as a universal positive value over extinction which is looked at as a negative value. Morality and value systems are artificial constructs based on axioms that we accept as true within a specific context. Thus we as Realists accept this root axiom and we have something solid to base our systems of morality - right and wrong - without the need for an omnipotent rule giver.
In order to continue to exist we have to pursue the understanding of reality.
In addition to the Root Axiom, the Church of Reality has the Sacred Axiom - that the pursuit of the understanding of reality has value. The Sacred Axiom used to be our root axiom but our new root axiom is technically better in that it is more primitive and less subjective. Our Sacred Axiom is derived from the root axiom. In order to continue to exist we need to live in Right Relationship with Reality. We have to understand the reality we exist in in order to survive. Thus the Sacred Axiom becomes a method for accomplishing the Root Axiom.
Have you ever wondered why food that is good for you tastes good and poison tastes bad? Do you think that is a coincidence? It's not. It's evolution at work. Primitive life depends on massive reproduction with the idea that 99.9% of them are going to die. But as life evolves those things with the best survival skills life on and that with bad survival skills die off. So over time life developed taste to try to determine if something we are about to eat is going to nourish us or kill us. If good food tastes good and poison tastes bad then we are more likely to be the one that survives.
Emotions control our behavior the way taste controls where we eat.
Emotions are to behavior as taste is to eating. Our emotions control our behavior the same way taste helps us choose the right food. Fear, for example, is easy to understand. When our ancestors hear something rustling in the bushes they start running in fear before the see the tiger chasing them. Those who were afraid at the right time are our ancestors. Those who were afraid too late became food for the ancestors of tigers.
Over billions of years emotions evolved. Unpleasant emotions prevent us from doing what is wrong. Pleasant emotions help us do what is right. Our emotions have been crudely programmed by evolution and the emotions that help us survive statistically triumph over the emotions that don't. Those with more accurate emotional programming do better than those who get it wrong.
Evolution created emotions to help us do the right thing it takes to survive.
Many people, when asked what the purpose of life is answer, "Happiness". But what is happiness. Is that something that is scientifically specific enough to be a criteria? Some people are broken and what makes them happy is not what makes most people happy. For example, killing Jews makes Hitler happy. And we all know that's not the right answer.
But - if we look at happiness as an evolved set of emotional programming that helps us to survive then we can see that the pursuit of happiness is really the pursuit of survival. And I think we can all agree that if we create a world where humanity thrives and continues to evolve in a positive direction that people would be happy. And if we do the wrong thing and that we devolve into mass destruction, chaos, the collapse of society then we will be unhappy. And if we really take the wrong path then we cease to exist and happiness goes away completely.
Humans evolved to work as a group. To function as a society. We had to get along in tribal society sitting around the fire to keep warm, hunting and cooking food, growing crops, and defending the tribe from predators and enemies in other tribes. In order to do that we had to evolve behavior to get along. Our brains evolved to process speech to communicate more and more complex ideas. And our emotions evolved so that we could function as a group.
People have asked, "Where does spirituality fit into the Church of Reality?" Religious people make the argument that it is that spiritual connection, coming from a deity, that teaches us right and wrong "in our heart". Of course we know that deities don't exist and if the deity doesn't exist then it can't cause things. But yet the spiritual sensation is still there. What is that?
Spirituality is Darwin giving us emotional candy for playing nice with others.
Just like taste is evolution's way of teaching us what to eat, emotions are evolutions way of teaching us how to behave to survive. Since we need to work as a group, as a tribe, we have evolved emotional rewards for doing the right thing. Feeling spiritual is like Darwin giving us a gold start for good behavior. When we feel we are part of a group and that we are connected to a greater purpose then we feel spiritual. The spiritual sensation always involves a real or imagined connection to other people. That's why Atheists have spiritual experiences.
When we play nice with others we are rewarded with happy feelings. If we become leaders we feel the power of having a high social status as a valued member of the community. In the case of males it causes females to want to mate with us. Women are attracted to men of high social status. People wonder how things like music, art, dancing relate to evolution. These are things that bond us as a group. Help us work together as a tribe to take care of each other, to bond. When you look at evolution as survival and realize that group bonding was necessary then a lot of social behavior and emotional behavior all of a sudden makes sense.
The Church of Reality is a religion based on the practice of Realism. It is a religion that is based on believing in everything that is real. Our motto is, "If it's real, we believe in it." Since no one knows all of reality, the Church of Reality is about the pursuit of reality the way it really is. We commit to being intellectually honest with ourselves, and with others, so that we can cut through the mythology and understand the understanding of understanding.
Our world view is that religion is evolving in the Sacred Direction and that the Church of Reality is a blueprint for religious evolution. We want to inject reality into the world view of other religions so that we are all improved through Realism.
We all refer to God as HE implying that God is male. What does that mean - that God is male? Does it means that God must have a penis? Does he have testicles? What does God use his penis for? Isn't that the definition of being male? After all - what is male anyhow? Male is a living being with a penis. If God were female - she would have a vagina. If God had neither - then it wouldn't be described in terms of gender. Of course - to even bring up the subject of God's penis is blasphemy because the penis is a dirty thing and God would obviously be ashamed of his penis and if I end up killed in a car crash or assassinated by a Christian fanatic then it's because God got angry and struck me down for talking about his penis.
Seriously though - if this sounds ridiculous - it's in the Bible. We are created in the shape of God. And since God is male then he must have one. And since God fills the universe and has shape then the universe must have a penis. Don't blame me - the Bible says it! Why would God have such a thing and what does he do with it? What are his sexual preferences? Do you think God ever did it? Maybe that's why women yell, "Oh God!" Yep - definitely going to burn in Hell for that remark! One of the mysteries of the universe ....
People don't like the idea of evolution because of our fear of death and that we like to think of ourselves as something special. The idea that we "came from monkeys" is as disgusting as sex. If God made man in his image and we are the only life in the universe and we dominate over all other things and we're going to live forever, that would be a great reality for us. Unfortunately, that's not the way it is.
On the other hand, this planet is but a speck of dust in the universe. We are a small planet rotating around a star that is one of billions of stars in a galaxy that is one of billions of galaxies in a universe that existed for billions of years. The universe is likely teaming with life, some of which is so evolved that they would never visit here because we are too primitive to even be considered interesting, unless we were considered tasty food. We exist as a result of random chance and the only reason we exist is because our parents and their parents before them gave in to overwhelming sexual instincts, like the animals have, and we were formed as a chance DNA combination. We exist for no other reason.
Now, which one would you rather believe? It's simple. We would all rather believe that we are special and that God has a special purpose for us and that we are important. But which one is real? The one we would rather believe? Or do we believe what is supported by scientific fact. Sometimes what we want and the way things are not the same. It takes courage to believe in what's real. Those who are afraid of what's real are attached to maintaining the illusion of a creation rather than facing the facts. The reason I'm here is because my father didn't have it together enough to use a condom properly. It's that simple.
This last point can be briefly explained. Despite its simplicity, I think it is a very powerful argument for a completely fictional Jesus. It has been said “many times in many ways,” as the song lyric goes, but Frank Zindler recently stated it quite succinctly.
Zindler notes that many liberal Christian apologists will readily agree that, “While the gospels cannot be taken literally, they are at least evidence of somebody [emphasis in original] extraordinary. But these same apologists miss the irony of Jesus being so obscure that no secular record of him survives. (It is ironic also that despite being a well-known public figure and rabble-rouser, Jesus nevertheless is so colorless and forgettable that the authorities have to bribe Judas to point him out!)” (The Jesus The Jews Never Knew, p. 5) This last point Zindler puts in parenthesis because it assumes that the reader might think that at least some part of the gospel fables might be true. I believe, as does Zindler, that this is extraordinarily unlikely, to the point of a vanishing possibility.
In conclusion, I believe that in this article I have at least “hit the highlights” of the arguments for a purely fictional Jesus with his purely fictional “gospel.”
Clarence Darrow may have summarized the pure-myth position most succinctly when he said, “I don’t believe in Jesus because I don’t believe in Mother Goose.” No, Virginia, I’m afraid that it is time now to grow up. There really isn’t any Santa Claus. And even though there may have been a Christian bishop, born in 270 CE, who was rumored to have secretly shared his inherited wealth with the poor, this has nothing whatsoever to do with the myth of the fat guy in a red suit who, on December 25th, drops down the chimney’s of every world-wide Christian family who has one or more children to deliver presents, with the aide of a sleigh pulled by flying reindeer. Additionally, there is also no Tooth Fairy, no Mother Goose, and Jesus never was.
The decision of the State of South Dakota to ban all abortions puts a substantial burden on the sincerely held beliefs of the Church of Reality that believes a woman has an absolute right to an early term abortion without any outside restrictions. The right of a woman to control her own reproduction is vital to the advancement of society which is necessary to advance the cause of exploring reality the way it really is.
For thousands of years women have suffered persecution as second class beings and have been forced into a state of oppression based on religious doctrine. The Church of Reality takes the position that the human race will be far better off by helping women become fully equal in status as men. In order to accomplish sexual equality, women need to be empowered. We hold that the rights of women have intrinsic value and that society is diminished when women are denied the ability to make their own life decisions and to control their own destiny.
We in the Church of Reality recognize that overpopulation of the planet is a serious threat to the integrity of human civilization, and that overpopulation is worsened when women are compelled to bear children against their will. We hold that overpopulation is a threat to our environment and a threat to the stability of society. We believe that overpopulation is a threat to positive evolution and will lead to war, plagues, and famine.
We reject the notion that pregnancy is God's way of punishing teenage girls for chastity violations.
We believe that a person has the right to control their own lives and make their own choices even if those choices are considered to be clearly wrong choices. We hold that the individual has a sacred right to live the life they choose to live and to enjoy and suffer the consequences of their decisions. We hold these personal decisions to be private and not a matter that requires any justification from or explanation to society.
We take the position that a person begins their existence and has the rights of a human being at live birth. We reject that personhood and personal rights begin at conception. We in fact recognize that the two cells that make up a person are alive before conception and that conception is one of many steps necessary to produce a person. It has no more significance than any other necessary step.
We hold that the true purpose of these restrictions on abortion is the furtherance of a religious agenda that is contrary to our religious beliefs and that the members of our church should not be subject to domination by the doctrines of other religions that we don't agree with.
The State of South Dakota wants to force women who are raped to bear the children of their attacker against their will!
In particular, the South Dakota law prohibits all abortions even in cases of rape or incest. Therefore if a father rapes his daughter and impregnates her, she is forced to bear his child under the law. We in the Church of Reality finds this to be repulsive. Not only is the rape victim who would seek an abortion criminalized, but the doctor who provided the abortion would be criminalized as well.
We find the idea of the State forcing women who are raped to bear the children of the rapist to be fundamentally opposite to our standards of right and wrong and to be both morally and religiously offensive. Our belief system requires us to be compassionate towards rape victims and to empower women by giving them the resources to end pregnancies that were caused by a violent attacker. For us to allow the State of South Dakota to deny these women abortion services is to allow government cruelty towards the female members of our church. Realists have a religious duty to protect women from state sponsored oppression.
Pursuant to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and consistent with the Supreme Court decision upholding the right to religious freedom, I Marc Perkel, as the highest authority of Church of Reality law do hereby declare and decree by edict the following:
That the right of a woman to choose to have an abortion is an intrinsic right recognized by Church of Reality doctrine.
That the Church of Reality finds that the South Dakota Abortion Ban is repulsive, barbaric, unethical, irresponsible, and immoral.
That this law infringes upon our freedom of religion under the First Amendment and places a substantial burden on our sincerely held religious belief in the right of women to choose to have abortions.
That this law is a thinly veiled attempt by other religions to exercise religious domination by using the power of the state to further their religious cause at the expense of our First Amendment right to free exercise of our religious beliefs.
That the law criminalizes abortion providers preventing them from providing abortions services to Realists cutting off our female members' ability to legally obtain an abortion.
That it is our position that the State of South Dakota has no compelling government interest in prohibiting abortions and therefore, pursuant to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the rights of Realists to get abortions in South Dakota take precedent over South Dakota law.
We therefore demand that the State of South Dakota make provisions in their law enforcement system to allow members of the Church of Reality to legally obtain abortions and to provide doctors and other health care professionals immunity from prosecution for providing abortion services to Realists.
We live on a planet where over 99.99% of all species that have ever existed are now extinct. There's nothing that makes Humanity any different from the species that didn't make it. Those who get it right survive, those who get it wrong don't. The Church of Reality by definition has a vested interest in our collective survival. Our purpose is the understanding of reality as it really is. In order to do that we have to continue to exist.
In the Church of Reality getting it right isn't optional. Our religion is future based and in order for there to be a positive future we are going to have to figure it out based on real reality. To do that we have to be both patient and persistent. We can't give up, and we can't rush it. It is against our principles to give in to extinction.
Living in Right Relationship with Reality is that we learn to live together as a society so that we can continue to exist and Evolve forward and Stay in the Game. If we don't live in right relationship with reality then we will become extinct or Left behind.
Living in right relationship to reality is a commitment of humanity to stay on the path that got us here in the first place. That path is that we continue to evolve forward so that we continue to exist. To continue to exist is our Root Axiom.
Life is a struggle between evolution and extinction. The reason we exist is because our ancestors lived in right relationship to reality. Most species become extinct. Some evolve into better versions of life. Some species were just dead ends. We are the decedents of those who got it right so far. Those who lived in right relationship with reality.
There is nothing in the universe that guarantees that we will continue to exist. When the next super volcano occurs or a big asteroid hits that we didn't see coming or a local star goes supernova, we could be wiped out. In the long run something like that will happen. Thus if humans are going to be around for the long run we are going to have to move out into space and find other planets to colonize. In order to do that we are going to have to figure out who we are, how we got here, what our purpose for existence is, and how we are going to survive.
We are developing the technology to determine what we are going to evolve into. We will soon be able to modify our genetics and to add mechanical technology to our bodies. We have to start thinking now about what we are going to evolve into and it is definitely not too early to start thinking about it. One thing for sure - what we will become is not what we are now. We will either be vastly superior or we will be gone. It is up to us to bring ourselves in right relationship with reality so that in the future when we look back at what we are doing today that we feel good about having made the right choices.
Humanity's children return to destroy humanity
From Battlestar Galactica
No one knows our future. We can only try imagine what we will become. If we survive and thrive what we will become is beyond anything we can imagine. As we make the transition into an engineered form of evolution there are some recurring themes from our science fiction that are likely enough that we should consider.
For example, as computing power keeps doubling there should be a point, and not far off where computers are smarter than we are. It might be computer become an independent individual or that we might somehow merge into it. But let us imagine what it would mean if we created a robot race that was a life form and had more capabilities than humans. What would that mean? Where would we fit in that world? Or would they just kill us off? And shouldn't we at least be thinking about this now?
Our values are shaped by evolution. Our emotions keep our behavior in check so that we do what it takes to survive. We might not know our purpose but life fulfills our purpose whether we understand it or not. We are the universe becoming self aware. But computers don't have emotions. They are engineered by use and not by billions of years of evolution. They have no will to survive or to thrive. They don't feel good when they do the right thing. They care about nothing. They don't care about us. They don't even care about themselves. That is unless we teach them to care.
But for them to care we would have to program them with our values. How do we do that? Wouldn't the first step be for us to determine what our values are and be able to describe them in a way that even a machine can understand. Can we write empathy in code? The correct answer is - we better figure out how.
The best way to teach AI the meaning of life is to use AI to help us discover it ourselves. This Church of Reality isn't something that was invented by some guy. The Church of Reality is a name for something that exists in Reality itself that can be discovered. And what better tool to discover the meaning of life than using AI to help us do that?
If AI were applied to philosophy and it helped us discover a science based set of rules that reflected the evolutionary "will of the universe" then the control problem goes away. The AI will be ready to "do the right thing" because it was part of the process to determine what the right thing do do is.
The Church of Reality is different in that we are not dedicated to a fictional world view. Our world view is to see reality the way it really is. Other religions' world views are based on mythology. All religions have some basis in reality. Most would agree that murder is bad. On those universal concepts we in the Church of Reality agree. But in those other religions, if their world view contradicts reality, they are expected to reject reality in favor of their world view. Rarely are other religions dedicated to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. In this church, if you come to realize that what you currently believe is wrong, you are expected to change your mind. That's what's different about the Church of Reality. The beliefs are not static. Reality is a learning process. We are an evolving religion. Of all the religious choices out there, we believe that Reality should be one of those choices.
So - this guy Jesus comes along and he's God's son. He was born to a virgin ..... hmmmmm .... yeah right! OK - Let's just assume that God can do anything and that he can reproduce through a human virgin. I'll just give them that one. But - why? What's the point?
Think about it. God - infinitely powerful - created the entire universe with trillions of stars - (although some believe that scientists have never actually proved that stars exist.) - this God goes to this tiny little planet and finds him a virgin to have a son with. And - she had to be a virgin because our method of reproduction is dirty. And - although God is male - he certainly doesn't use his penis for that sort of thing. So - God reproduces with human females and he has this son Jesus who starts a carpentry business. Then he goes out and performs a few miracles and is crucified on Friday - or was it Saturday? Then he comes back from the dead three days later. on Easter Sunday. A miracle in itself! You can't kill God you see. At least - you can't kill God for more than three days. That's the rule.
So Jesus dies for our sins. God has to allow his son to be killed because God does a human sacrifice for us to prove he loves us. Hmmmmm ... talk about a Jewish guilt trip! So - now it's all about faith and what you believe or don't believe - and if you don't believe this - you're going to burn in Hell forever after you're dead. It raises an interesting question. How much do you have to scare a person to get them to believe in something that's totally ridiculous? That is the real question here!
Christianity itself has evolved over the centuries. In order to survive it has had to change and adapt. Many religions and many branches of Christianity have become extinct over the centuries. In order to survive, Christianity has had to merge with the cultures of other religions. For example, Christmas is not a Christian holiday. Christmas was originally Yule and people cut down and decorated trees long before Christ was born. Easter had nothing to do with Christ rising from the dead. Easter was a pagan fertility ritual where pagans prayed to the Gods for reproduction and food. Hence, the rabbits and the eggs.
It's hard to believe that all modern forms of Christianity evolved from Catholics.
The religions of the world are threatened by modern science. We humans have evolved to the point where we know a lot more than we ever did and we now know that a lot of what we believed for centuries is just plain wrong. However, we humans are still herd animals and it is our instinctive nature to continue to believe what the tribe believes rather than what's logical. Our minds have not yet evolved to the point where logic and reason dominates over tribal patterns. (Except for me of course. That's why I'm writing this.) But because of technology, and especially computers, the day is coming when the rest of humanity can move up to my level and beyond. (Sorry, it's not ego, it's my warped sense of humor. In your heart you know I'm right though.)
As religion evolves, people will turn from mythology to reality. As humans become smarter, people will want to understand the real world the way it really is. The 21st century will be the century of the global mind and the Church of Reality will evolve into the dominate religion on the planet. And I will go down in history as the Dalai Lama of nerds.
Note: Some of the books listed here support a historical myth, or a philosophical myth position (positions 2 or 3, described earlier). Some, like Burton Mack, Robert Price and others seem to adopt an agnostic stance on the historicity matter, although they have often done some of the best research which has lead to a nearly complete destruction of any chance for such a historical Jesus. All the books in this bibliography are highly recommended. I have undoubtedly left out others that by chance I have not read or just didn’t consider for inclusion. For those readers who wish to "zero in" on the pure myth (position 4) supporters, I have indicated these books with an asterisk.
*Acharya S, The Christ Conspiracy: The Greatest Conspiracy Ever Sold, Klempton, IL, Adventures Unlimited, 1999.
Anonymous, "Cookie Cutter Christs, nontract # 8", Madison, WI, Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. No date.
*Barker, Dan, Losing Faith in Faith, (See Chapter 51, "Jesus: History or Myth"), Madison, WI, Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., 1992.
*Doherty, Earl, Challenging the Verdict, Ottawa Canada, Age of Reason Publications, 2001.
*_______ , The Jesus Puzzle, Ottawa Canada, Canadian Humanist Publications, 1999.
Ellegard, Alvar, Jesus One Hundred Years Before Christ, Woodstock, NY, The Overlook Press, 1999.
*Freke, Timothy & Gandy, Peter, The Jesus Mysteries, NY, Harmony Books, 2000.
Harwood, William, Mythology’s Last Gods, Amherst, NY, Prometheus Books, 1992.
Environmentalism and Ecology are central to the Church of Reality because it is directly related to our survival and positive evolution. We are all children of Mother Earth and the Tree of Life. We are not separate beings that are independent of life around us. We all evolved together and we depend on each other for our food and the air we breathe.
We are one planet. We are all here together. We depend on each other to survive. This is our home and we have to take care of it.
If we poison the air and water with pollution then we have to breathe poison air and drink poison water. The world is not infinitely big and our trash is not going to just go away. Our resources are not unlimited and we have to have a plan to create and maintain a world that we can thrive on until such time as we have the technology to move out to other planets.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Unlike some religions the Church of Reality isn't afraid of a little humor. We aren't afraid of someone being critical of what we believe in. We don't turn violent over mere words or symbols. This cartoon was chosen because it is offensive. I didn't pick this one because I liked it but because I didn't like it. It represent how many religions really view Realists and what they think is going to happen to us in the after life.
Muslim violence is fundamentally wrong. I say to Muslims, what is your religion about? Realists believe that you are what you do. What you do reflects what you really believe in. We do not care what you say you are about or what your holy books say. We do not care about the history of your religion. What matters to us is what you do in this life in the here and now. I see violence, burning, anger, murder. That is what you are doing and it's all over some stupid cartoons. It is what you do who defines what you are and after seeing the cartoons I have to say that the behavior of the Muslim world shows the cartoonist had a point. Islam's public face is violent. Your faith is weaker than your anger.
Those of you who claim that Islam is about love and peace I say, show it to me. I say take control of Islam or split off and form your own religion. Show us by your behavior who you are.
The Church of Reality expects no loyalty from its members that would override good judgement. If we do not do what the name of our religion symbolizes then members are to leave this religion and form a new church that really is dedicated to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. We are a religion that is based on the Principle of Wisdom which does not allow us to let anger rule what we do. We do not let ourselves be controlled by the words of others. We contain our emotions and think things through. If someone draws a cartoon about us then we look at that to see if there is something to be learned that we are overlooking. Maybe the Muslim world should look at the cartoons and try to understand why Mohammed is depicted with a bomb on his head. From what I see from the way Muslims are behaving the cartoon makes sense to me.
What you do reflects what you believe in. If you are violent then what you believe in is violence.
The Church of Reality challenges Islam to show wisdom. We challenge you to show the world who you are and what you stand for. We challenge you to show us that you can stop the violence and live in a world as productive members of society. We want to know that you aren't going to go out and start killing people every time someone pisses you off. From what I can tell your behavior is an insult to your God. You look at the news and you tell me, is this what God wants you to do? Is this an example of the way people of God behave? Do you want to stand before God and explain that you represented God in this manner and face his judgement? I would think not.
The civilized world is watching Islam. We are asking ourselves if we want to share community with you. We are asking ourselves if you are safe to be around or are you going to slit our throats while we sleep. We Realist believe in freedom of religion. But that freedom stops when we feel that a group threatens civilization. What we see in the news is worrisome.
Telescope Time (or microscope time) is a metaphor for time spent exploring reality. It is a measure for how well the society we live in is functioning. If we have a good stable community to live in that is safe, has good education, food, transportation, utilities, and happy productive people then we have time left to look through telescopes and explore the universe we live in. We have time to explore reality and grow the Tree of Knowledge. However if we live in a world of high crime, war, injustice, or poverty where we have to work hard just to stay alive then we have less telescope time and can't explore reality.
As members of the Church of Reality the exploration of reality is important to us. We need to explore reality so that humanity can Stay in the Game. Otherwise we will be Left Behind. We therefore require a stable happy community so that we have telescope time so that we can continue to exist.
We started off with a tiny universe that was all energy and over time matter evolved. At first it was just hydrogen and helium. Gravity pulled the natter together the stars formed. Heavier elements were created and then through supernovas the universe made the elements we are made out of. We are the stardust that Carl Sagan spoke of.
We have evolved the ability to turn men into women. (Jenna Talackova)
The Earth formed some 4.5 billion years ago and then life formed and evolved. Life was tough back then even for microbes but life persisted and eventually here we are. Although some people complain, life is better now than it ever was. In just the last 50 years we now have the Internet where any person can share any idea about anything with the rest of the people on the planet at almost no cost. This Church of Reality is an example of that. What a wondrous time to be alive.
200 years ago people only lived half as long as we do now. Although our biology hasn't changed humans can now fly. We have traveled to the moon. We have sent probes out into interstellar space. We can talk to and see anyone in the world as if they are sitting right in front of us. We can cut the heart out of one person and put it in another. With computer chips we can make rocks think. We have launched telescopes into space that allow us to see back almost to the beginning of time. And this all is just the beginning.
Although many look at the future with trepidation, I think that we should look at the future as opportunity. What an incredible place this universe is. The more we learn about reality the more interesting it becomes. Just a few thousand years ago the world was flat and there was the Earth and the sky above. Then we figured we were on a sphere, that the Sun was a start and we were orbiting it. That we were part of a solar system. Then we discovered we were part of a galaxy, and that there are some trillion other galaxies out there.
There is no limit to what we might learn, what we might evolve into, the knowledge yet to be discovered. All we have to do is stay in the game to experience the wonders of tomorrow.
We now know that our universe had a beginning, and we have an idea what happened and how it evolved into us. And we are now wondering what else might is out there to be discovered. Is our universe the sum total of reality? Or are we but one universe among an infinite number of other universes in some multiverse? And is there something beyond that?
All of this knowledge is out there waiting to be discovered. We are reality discovering itself. We are like a baby that has jst found its toes. What an amazing place this is. The more we know the more interesting it gets. With what we learned in the last 100 years, what will it be like 100 years from now? What will it be like 1000 years from now, or a billion years from now? We are just scratching the surface. So much to understand. So much to explore.
But in order to do that we have to continue to survive and to thrive. We need to keep growing the Tree of Knowledge. We need to continue to exist. In order to do that we have to live in Right Relationship with Reality. We have to understand our purpose in the universe and try to figure out what the universe wants to become through us.
Every religion has it's own world view and culture. The Church of Reality is no different. Our world view and culture are rooted in the Sacred Principles which define our ethical standards. Although our mission is to explore reality, we need to deal with a lot of other related issues to do that. Here is an overview of what being a Realist is all about.
If God does exist then he must be hiding somewhere. Been a long time since he showed up in public. All we seem to have is this old book called the Bible. If God is all powerful and is everywhere - then why is he so inaccessible? Why doesn't he have a web site? Why doesn't he have an e-mail address? Why can't we call him on the phone? Why doesn't he appear on television? Why doesn't he update the Bible and do book signings at Barnes and Noble? Why doesn't he give speeches at the United Nations? He's not even registered to vote! (Although we all know that if God were here that he'd be a white American male and vote for Republicans.)
God is not only hiding - but for some reason God is so powerless that God needs to act through us to accomplish anything. If God has something to say then he has to make someone speak gibberish (tongues) and someone else interpret that. I've seen that happen and it's a scary scene. One has to assume that either God really is speaking through these people - or that these people are seriously mentally deranged. Most likely the latter because if God is all powerful you would think he would have basic communication skills. You'd think he'd show up as a burning bush and speak for himself!
One has to conclude that God is at least hiding for some reason and that there is enough evil in the world that he's obviously not involved. Or - everything is going exactly as planned and therefore what I am writing now is part of God's plan - even though I will burn in Hell forever for writing it. Is God testing us? Why would he have to do that? Since he can see the future - he already knows what the results are. I guess the invisible guy in the sky will remain invisible.
The Principle of Compassion recognizes the cooperative nature of the human race. We are individuals that are part of a great and evolving society. We are both independent and interdependent. Our societies are what makes us strong, but those societies are made up of individuals who have to be secure and taken care of individually in order to maintain our individualism.
We are one planet, we are all here together, and if we all help each other out, life will be better for all of us.
No person is an end unto themself. We are all totally interdependent. When we are born we are helpless and we depend on others to take care of our needs. The same is true when we are old or when we are sick or injured. There are times in our lives when we care for others, and times in our lives when others care for us. Compassion is absolutely essential for the human race to survive. Without compassion all of society would fall apart and we would become extinct.
The Church of Reality subscribes to the Philosophy of the Open Hand. We are altruistic, generous, giving, sharing, loving, selfless, and caring people. We honor loving-kindness, friendliness, goodwill, benevolence, fellowship, amity, concord, charity, and non-violence. Our compassion is based on the reality of our interdependence, that we are strong collectively, and our independence, that we can be secure individually. We take care of each other, and we are taken care of.
Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.
Similar to concepts in other religions, the concept of "left behind" implies a punishment for disobeying religious law. This concept also exists within the Church of Reality but in our religion it is a metaphor for extinction.
The Church of Reality sees two paths for humanity, evolution and extinction. If we do the right things then we get to continue to exist or Stay in the Game. If we aren't smart and we defy the laws of nature and ignore reality then we will become extinct and we'll be left behind. If you reject reality - reality might reject you.
As we can see Humanity has but one purpose. Our purpose is to be the mechanism for which reality becomes self aware. It is what we have to do in order to continue to exist.If we fail then we become extinct. Let's review what we have learned.
Since the beginning of the universe with the Big Bang the universe has been evolving. Evolution is randomness that selects on what survives. Evolution is a property of the universe.
Evolution creates complexity and that which is smarter tends to survive better. Thus evolution create intelligence. Failure to evolve intelligence leads eventually to extinction.
We must continue to evolve. In order to survive we have to be able to deflect asteroids that would wipe us out. Eventually we have to adapt to a changing planet and get off this planet and move out into space. In order to do that we will have to understand a lot more about reality than we do now. Failure to do so means extinction.
We evolved from the universe. We are a creation of the universe's evolutionary process. We have evolved to where we can contemplate the universe. We are really the universe contemplating itself. The universe becomes self aware through us. We are the process through which reality becomes self aware.
If there are other intelligent civilizations in the universe the same rules apply to them. They too are the universe becoming self aware and if they stop evolving they too will become extinct. The only survivors are those who learn to live in Right Relationship with Reality.
Although we are individual people, we function as a huge single organism that is some 4 billion years old. Humanity understands reality collectively through a group effort and our collective technology. Our understanding of reality is our Tree of Knowledge. Our species is interdependent on other life forms on this planet and on the planet itself. Our survival depends not just our individual lives but life on this planet as a whole. Otherwise we collectively face extinction.
Humanity is turning the corner into a new evolutionary paradigm where we will be switching to engineered evolution. We will choose what we will evolve into. We will design the future of life on this planet.
We have already evolved to be dependent on our machines and our technologies to survive. It is accurate to look at humanity as being a partially machine based species. As we evolve our technology will play a more and more important role in what we are. We could evolve into a completely machine based life form. Such a life form would be a child species.
The better choices we make the more likely we are to survive. We can make better choices abut where we're going if we understand who we are and what our purpose is. When we know our purpose then we have a goal and a direction to guide our decisions so that we survive and thrive. If we fail to understand our purpose we night make bad choices that lead to our extinction.
If we choose to survive then realizing that our purpose is to be the mechanism for which reality understands itself must become the basis for the moral foundation of society. This purpose gives us a direction and a goal, something to live for, something to help us make the important decisions that will determine our future. It gives us an objective basis for deciding what is right and wrong. It gives us hope and a vision towards the future.
Our purpose is to be the mechanism whereby reality becomes self aware. Our understanding of reality must grow over time. All other paths lead to extinction.
The bottom line is that we are reality understanding itself and our purpose is to grow that understanding. All other paths lead to extinction. Although we have choice there really is but one choice to be made if we are going to continue to be around to make choices. We have to live in right relationship to reality or we're gone.
To avoid confusion and misconceptions, here is a list of things that the Church of Reality is not. Sometimes a religion can better clarify what it is by stating what it isn't. We are like other religions in many ways and in many ways we are not like other religions. Here is a list of what we are not.
This is a very interesting question. If so many people believe it - doesn't that mean it's most likely true? This question exposes a flaw in human nature that causes mass quantities of people to belive in things that are obviously not true. And many of these people are smart people. So why do smart people believe in stupid things? It has to do with the human brain being an imperfect tool. And logic is not the dominant factor that controls our thinking.
To answer this question we have to look back at human evolution. The ability to reason and communicate and to pass on knowledge from one person to another is at best a few hundred thousand years old. Before that our brains were dedicated to defending ourselves, obtaining food, and mating. And those instincts are far stronger and more well developed. One of those instincts is the instinct to socialize and act as a group in order to better survive. We are like a hive of bees who are individuals, yet can't survive by themselves. Bees live in hives which are really a super organism which is a collection including thousands of bees. Although humans are not as integrated as bees, we are definitely herd animals, and we depend on being part of society as our super organism. And that dependence on society is something that is hard wired in our brains on the instinct level and is far stronger than logic is.
An example of instinct being stronger than logic is President Clinton having sex with Monica Lewinsky. Here's a smart guy who obviously knew better but did it anyhow. In fact if you actually read the Starr report you can plainly see how he struggled to stop doing it and break it off and just couldn't help himself. And when it comes down to it - we're more like Clinton than most of us realize. If we weren't - the human race would have become extinct millions of years ago. If you look at what Clinton did in the context of instinct rather than logic - it all make total sense.
But sex isn't the only instinctive behavior to override our logic. Our need to organize as a society is at least as strong as our sexual instincts. For example - much of our brain and the structure of our mouth, tongue and vocal cords are devoted to speech. And speech has only one purpose - to communicate with other people. And we communicate because we have to. It's a key part of our survival strategy. We are totally interdependent on each other and our very being is programmed to form associations and work as a group. It is important to fit into the herd - and as we see in times of war - we are even willing to die for the herd.
Our common knowledge which I call the Tree of Knowledge is what distinguishes us from the animals. Our collective intellectual commons is far bigger than any one human mind can store and we are dependent on others to process knowledge for us and we have to trust others that they know what is true so that we can function in society. And the most common way of relying on external information is if "everyone" seems to accept it.
The advantage of the human mind allocating information storage and trust to other people or groups of people is that we have access to much more information than we can store and process ourselves. The disadvantage of this information allocation is that if the group is wrong - then all the members are wrong.
The need to be a member of a group is stronger than logic and will override logic.
It is often difficult for an individual to go up against the group mind pressure on some specific issues. Especially when it come to religion and especially if the information was drilled into you at a young age. The Church provides a sense of community and belonging and emotional security that we are all hard wired to need. It is important to us to be part of our groups for many reasons. So - when the groups we depend on believe that God exists - we accept that God exists even if our logic would suggest that he doesn't. Our need to be part of the group is much stronger than logic and therefore our minds play tricks on us in order to make our logic adapt around what would otherwise be an obvious flaw.
So - how do we rise above our instincts and determine what the truth really is knowing that our minds are under influences stronger than logic? For example - maybe my need to associate with my fellow cult members (people who I associate with) who are atheists are driving me to espouse positions that have undermined my logic. One always has to question ones own imperfect mind. If you were raised as a Christian - how do you know if you should question that?
There are a lot of religions on this planet and they have very different views of God - or Gods - or no God. One thing that is common is that people feel in their heart usually that the religion they were raised in is the true religion and that all other religions look like heathen nonsense. Christians think Muslims are primitive heathens, and Muslims consider Christians to be Infidels. Both use this view to justify slaughtering each other as surrogates of a mythical God. I personally was raised Jewish (somewhat) and had to believe that being a Jew was better than any other religion, because if it weren't my parents would have converted to the better religion. And I believe that Jews really are one of the better religions on the planet even though the Old Testament is total bullshit. So - why do I believe that? Are Jews in some way superior - or - do I think that because I was influenced that way when I was a kid? How do I separate reality from the influences of my imperfect brain?
First - I look around at other people's bias based on the way they were raised and I have to assume that I am biased as well. And that what I believe about Jews is tainted by my instincts. I have to assume that my attitude towards Judaism is probably more favorable than reality would support since everyone else on the planet thinks their religion is best based only on being raised that way.
So - if you look around and see what I see - that people believe the religion they were raised with - and you believe the religion you were raised with - can you accept that it is as likely that you are as wrong about your religion as they are about theirs? Even though you "know in your gut" that you are right - you can't help but notice that they also "know in their gut" that they are right. In fact - for what it's worth - I know in my gut that I'm right. That believing in reality is the true religion. So - who's right? (I am!)
Getting back to the point here. All religions are cults - including this one. Our need to connect with a group and to identify with society is instinctive. Cult behavior isn't limited to just religions. Nationalism is similar. America is a cult. We believe we are better than everyone else and if God were here on Earth that he would be an American. Other cults include political parties, sports teams, neighborhood associations, memberships in organizations, corporations, etc. People organize into groups and are often willing to compromise their logic and accept the view of the group.
Have you ever wondered why - when a Jehovah's Witness, for example, comes to your door to convert you - that there's nothing you can say to them to shake their belief - even though what they are preaching is extremely idiotic? The reason you will never get anywhere is that this person is socially connected to this group. They are providing him more that just religious beliefs. This person has his identity tied to the cult mind. It gives him a sense of community and belonging and this identity and community is something that is important to him. If he were to question the beliefs of his group - he would eventually realize that it's bullshit and it would result in his having to leave the group. If this person is not prepared to leave the group - then his mind will play whatever tricks it needs to play in order to hang on to the required belief. Unless this person is ready to leave the cult - there is no way his mind can possibly accept information that is contrary to the required views of the cult.
Although it's easy for us to look at the Jehovah's Witnesses, or the Muslims, or the Hindus, or any other religion we are not a member of and see how ridiculous their beliefs are - when it comes to our own religion, country, or political party, well - that's different. Is it not true that the reason you might believe in the Bible and the God of the Bible is really because you have been brainwashed that way from childhood and that due to old mental patterns and fear of what you would lose socially - not to mention the idea that you are going to die and cease to exist - that you are too afraid to really consider that reality is not a pretty place and there is no God and we are out here all alone - responsible for our own choices - and with no parent figure in the sky to take care of us?
Anyhow - my point is - there are a lot of things that lots of people believe in that just aren't true - and it is the dharma of the Church of Reality to explore this and learn ways of separating what is real from what is not.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
The Principles of Determination and Defiance sometimes represents our religious commitment to the Path of Reality. We have chosen to include in our Life Story a commitment to Positive Evolution and the Sacred Direction. We are committed to the protection of the future. But there are times when systems break down and have to be repaired and maintained. There are times when the judgment of Society is in decline and people become a danger to themselves. In situations where it is absolutely necessary to protect society from doing something that's really a bad idea, it is up to us to be determined to restore the Positive Evolution of the human community.
For example, we Realists accept the truth that a nuclear war is never the best solution to your current problems. Our message is, "Don't even think about it!" And of course this applies to weapons of mass destruction in general. Or to consider the optimum human population of the planet. Or when leaders speak the Language of War. Or to avert a natural or man-made disaster. Or perhaps to protect or restore a sane and stable society. The kind of society where you have the rule of law not the rule of men. A society that lives in peace and harmony where it is a joy just to be alive.
We as a society have to be smart enough to figure out how to do it right!
Nelson Mandella
We believe the Wisdom comes from having an intimate relationship with reality. So it is up to us as Realists to bring wisdom in to society. We have to inject the importance of taking reality into consideration when making important decisions. We raise the question, "Is what we do today good for our future?" "Will we look back at this moment with pride or shame?" That is why the Sacred Direction is sacred because if we screw up we're not going to achieve Positive Evolution. If we screw up then tomorrow won't be better than today and our children will live in a worse world than the one we came into.
Let us be calm and reason together.
Martin Luther King
These are values that represent the kind of people we are as a religion. The dream of tomorrow must never be abandoned for the passions of the moment. Nor do we sacrifice the future for personal greed. But with defiance comes Responsibility. There should be a good reason to explain why defiance is the best choice.
We have a responsibility to give sanity a voice.
Every religion has a system of values. What is Sacred? What is Holy? Just because we don't have a deity in no way means that we don't have a system of morality. Our determination is a statement of our religious commitment to the future. But we have a responsibility to get it right, and not to be merely stubborn.
The Church of Reality is an emergent religion. It is part of the evolution of humanity. Humanity has evolved the Sacred Method also known as the scientific method which allows us to move from believing to knowing. We have developed the Internet which allows all of humanity to share knowledge between individuals and everyone else on the planet. We have used our telescopes to look back to the beginning of time and space.
Just as apples grow on apple trees when a life form such as ourselves evolves to this point we want to know why. What is our purpose in the universe? What does it all mean? What am I supposed to do what I wake up in the morning? What is right and wrong and where does right and wrong come from? The world of religion has attempted to answer these questions based on believing in holy books, but these old books are the old maps of reality. Science is the new map of reality. Instead of believing we now actually know how the universe was created and where we come from.
It is therefore natural that our evolutionary path include a merging of our understanding of reality and the purpose of our existence. We need to answer the questions posed here in the context of what actually exists. Thus it is inevitable that a Church of Reality must exist. It is in fact part of our evolutionary destiny. Even if it wasn't created here in this way it would eventually have been created elsewhere by others and it is likely to be very similar to this Church of Reality.
The Church of Reality is Religion 2.0. It is the next step in religious evolution. Now that we have knowing we can no longer rely on merely believing. We humans have to make decisions in order to continue to Stay in the Game. Otherwise we will be Left Behind. Existence vs. Extinction.
How does the "Meaning of Life" and the "Purpose of Humanity" compare with other religions. In some way it is quite similar and in some ways it's quite different. The biggest difference is that the Church of Reality is by definition more dedicated to getting it right than other religions. It came from the way the Church of Reality started. I was pondering religion and I thought, "If there were such a thing as the one true religion that got it right, what would that religion be?" My first thought was, "It would be the one that believed in everything that was real." And the name church of Reality came to mind.
Other religions are mostly backward looking religions that started with some great philosopher or event that was written down in a holy book that keeps getting less and less relevant with time. The Church of Reality is a forward looking religion and our world view changes with new discovery and our understanding becomes more and more relevant with time. Other religions are about clinging to their preconceived ideas. Our religion is about shedding our preconceived ideas. They are faith based, we are doubt based.
However all religions are meant to answer the great questions. Why are we here? What is our purpose? How should we live our lives? This is all born out of the quest to understand reality, and since these religions were created by real people living in the real world, reality had an influence on them. They are in many ways just like us.
The idea that we are here to "Seek the Truth" and that we are here to allow "Reality to become self aware through us" is essentially the same thing.
For example, all religions are about "Seeking the Truth". We are to be truth seekers. That's fairly universal. Well what does seeking the truth mean? What is the TRUTH? Reality is the truth. The Truth is all about what's real vs. what isn't real. So when we concluded that the purpose of life is for us to be the mechanism for which reality becomes self aware, and they conclude that humanity should seek the truth, that's very similar.
In many religions they worship God. Although there is no formal definition of God most religions define it as that which includes everything in the universe as part of God. Nothing is outside of God and nothing can be bigger than God. Our definition of reality is the sum total of everything that is real. Everything is included and nothing can be bigger than reality. So our reality is a 2.0 version of their God. If you take the purest meaning of their God and expand it you get our reality.
So in our religion the spiritual experience of realizing that I am reality contemplating itself and their concept of worshiping God has some similarities. Similarly thousands of years ago when they wrote the Bible, it was their best attempt at explaining reality and the origin of the universe with the level of technology they had at the time. Some of us thousands of years later look back and laugh but keep in mind that thousands of years from now people will be looking back and laughing at us. That is if we don't screw up and destroy ourselves.
Now science is the new Bible and it's not a static document. Science is the new method for discovering reality. It's the same goal, it's just that we have better methods now and in the future our methods will improve. Science is the Bible 2.0.
Similarly in Atheism people reject the belief in what is not real. But their motivation in doing so comes from our intrinsic need to have a relationship with reality. If not for reality Atheism would have no meaning. If not for reality there would be no place for God not to be real in.
Humanism too is a 1.0 version of realism. Humanism is pro humanity. Humanism wants humans to survive and thrive. Humanism rejects supernaturalism, but it fails to go all the way to fully embracing Realism as the way to achieve the Positive Evolution of humanity that they seek. The goal of humanism are the same as the Church of Reality but they lack the mechanism for achieving that goal and they lack the intellectual infrastructure to explain why they believe what they believe.
If we all come together and embrace reality we can continue to exist and explore this wondrous universe that are are part of. We can let reality explore itself through us.
We are all in this together. We either all survive or we all go extinct. No matter what religion or non-religion you are the Church of Reality is the upgraded version of where you are at now. It's time for all of humanity to come together and embrace reality as it really is and let us decide we are going to survive and thrive together as we explore this amazing universe that we are all part of, and that created us to want to understand everything.
The Tree of Knowledge is the sum total of human understanding and it is shared knowledge. Because this knowledge is shared, it exists only because of communication. The Tree of Knowledge is by nature dynamic and the knowledge within the tree must flow. Speech is communication in all forms. It is how the data move. It is the motion of the sap of the Tree of Knowledge. It is those data and it is the connections that carry those data. To speak freely is to do the dharma of the Church of Reality. Thus the Church of Reality recognizes that in order to pursue the understanding of understanding, we must be able to speak freely. To be silenced is to be oppressed.
The Principle of Communication is also the principle of free speech. What good is knowledge if it isn't communicated?
Since speech in the Church of Reality also includes the technological systems that carry, store, and distribute speech, the Church of Reality considers the development of better technology to enhance communication within the Tree of Knowledge to be our Sacred Duty and we therefore, as a Church, honor all communication technology that makes up the Golden Router and the Internet which is the heart of the Golden Router. The Internet is our Sacred Network. Conversely, the denial of technology isolates individuals and prevents communication between people who wish to communicate and this denial becomes a form of oppression.
So - you may be asking, "So I believe in the Bible. What's the harm? Why do you care if I want to waste my life pursuing insanity?" Yes - that is a strong point generally. The right to be wrong is one of the core principles of the Church of Reality because we often make a lot of mistakes on the path to discovering the truth. But - when a group of people threaten the well being of others then that's a different story.
In particular - Christians believe in the Apocalypse, or the end of the world. And - because it's important to them that they not be wrong - some of them are working towards making the world actually end. Others are just irresponsible and think that it doesn't matter how bad they mess things up because God will fix it and forgive them. That causes them to be irresponsible for their behavior and dangerous to society.
Faith in God is a dangerous thing. On September 11th 2001 a group of Muslims, acting on behalf of God, hijacked 4 planes and crashed them into buildings killing over 3000 people. The reason these people did it was because they believed they were acting on behalf of God and that God will reward them by giving them 70 virgins to have sex with for eternity. The fact is that these mass murderers are not in Heaven and that they are not having sex with 70 virgins. They are dead along with their victims. Why did this happen? Because they had faith! And as a result of their faith the world is a more dangerous place. Now Christians are seeing this as an opportunity to use their influence in the American administration to not only wage a war to kill a bunch of Muslims, but to take control of the world and impose God's laws (or rather what they believe are God's laws) on the rest of us by force.
Twenty years ago America had a Secretary of the Interior named James Watt. Watt was actually pro-pollution and his excuse was that it didn't matter what we did to the environment - Jesus was coming back soon to destroy the Earth. Jesus is dead - if he ever existed at all - and he is not coming back. But - people who believe he is coming are much more likely to destroy the Earth and use God as an excuse to make it happen. If religious fanatics get control of weapons of mess destruction they will use them as part of their ritual fantasies. and the rest of us will suffer the consequences.
We live on this small ball of dust and this ball is all we have for now. We have the technology to destroy all life on this planet (well - all life of any complexity anyhow) and this is our home - and it's home to all of us. So if some people believe in the Book of Revelations and use that as a basis or excuse to destroy the home for the whole human race - then they are encroaching on our rights.
Historically religion is the basis for most war. Christians slaughter Muslims, Muslims slaughter Jews, Jews slaughter Palestinians, Catholics slaughter Protestants. They all think that God gave them property. They think they are the "chosen people". And they all think they are acting on behalf of God because God is impotent and incapable of acting on his own behalf, these people have to do God's work for him, which often includes slaughtering the nonbelievers. Nonbelievers like me.
So - because of religion some moron might start a nuclear war or something and wipes out the human race and then this planet just becomes another lifeless piece of dust in the universe. Maybe the cockroaches will take over and become intelligent and form a better society? But - I have to admit that I'm partial to humans - one of my prejudices I suppose. I just think it's a bad idea to annihilate the human race. As the founder of the Church of Reality I'm going to go ahead and abuse my powers and declare that annihilating humanity is officially a sin and punishable by being annihilated.
And - it's not just one religion going to war with another. They end up killing a lot of innocent people along the way. And it's all for nothing. People have to die over something that doesn't exist. So - it's not just a bad choice to believe in God - it's a choice that is dangerous to yourself and others. There are however some religions who believe in God and are not a threat to other people and that's much better. But the bottom line in most religions is world domination and I don't want to live in a world dominated by a deity fantasy. I choose to believe in what's real.
The difference between believing and knowing is that knowledge is truth that us purifies through Scrutiny. When the Sacred Method (the Scientific Method) is applied to a belief and it stands the test of scrutiny it becomes knowledge. It is transformed from something that we believe to something that we actually know to be true.
In the Church of Reality we do not just choose to believe something just because we want to or it's part of our culture. Science has created disciplines that allows us a might higher degree of accuracy to determine if something is actually objectively true. When a belief is subjected to the scientific disciplines and it stands the test of scrutiny then the belief is purified into knowledge.
Even with this level of scrutiny we can still be wrong. Since we are not claiming divine intervention we don't have to meet the criteria of perfection that deities have. In fact we already know that a lot of what we believe today will be superseded by a deeper understanding in the future. Some of what we believe will be proven wrong. However if we use our best practices then what we have determined is still knowledge rather than belief even if some of it turns out not to be perfect.
In order to grow the Tree of Knowledge and to be a free people, to explore reality as it really is and to pursue the understanding of understanding, it is necessary that we do so in an environment of fairness and justice. Justice and fairness is the dharma of our morality. And our morality is the part of the Tree of Knowledge relating to how we best live together as a society and grow as individuals within the human species. Our justice system reflects the total of our morals and our understanding of maintaining ethical standards, and respecting each other and our combined growth. Justice is our set of rules by which society flourishes and allows mankind to evolve in the Sacred Direction. Conversely - injustice manifests in laws and rules and corruption that oppress us and cause society to deteriorate into oppression.
Justice is not a black robe - a title - or the ability to exert power and authority. Justice is the responsibility to maintain the highest ethical standards and to be as fair as one possibly can be. Justice is to not only uphold the rules - but also to apply wisdom to bend the rules to apply fairness to new and evolving situations. Justice should never be a set of static rules and procedures but should always be tested against the Sacred Question and the application of wisdom should be allowed to override the rule of law. We think justice itself must be committed to evolving in the Sacred Direction.
The bottom line is that there is no God and there is no afterlife and that this is all there is so you better enjoy it while it lasts. The God of the Bible is purely fiction and it's all one big lie. It would be nice if there were an afterlife and that we didn't have to face death and non-existence. It would be nice if there were some parental figure in the sky to take care of us when bad thing happen. But what we want and the way things are, are two different things. And you can't just believe in something because that's the way you want it to be and thereby make it so.
We are stuck here on this planet - a speck of dust in the universe - for but a flash of time. If we destroy ourselves then we are destroyed. There is no one out there who is going to clean up our mistakes other than ourselves. This is our planet and what we do matters and we are responsible for our own decisions. We are alone in the universe and this is our home - for better or worse - and we are survived through our genetic heritage (although to reproduce we have to accept a 50% cut with someone else's genes) and what we leave behind in the Tree of Knowledge. Our legacy is what we contribute to the knowledge of mankind that is worth remembering and the events that we change by living our lives.
Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Religion 3.0 is the next stage in the evolution of religion. Religion 1.0 was the authority of elders. Religion 2.0 was the authority of scripture. Religion 3.0 is the authority of evidence. Religion 3.0 is characterized by a move to base religious doctrine on evidence rather than belief. Religion 3.0 heralds the Age of Awakening moving from belief to knowledge and understanding who we are and what our purpose is in the context of Big History. That we are the universe contemplating its own existence.
Humanity have evolved to the point where we now understand the Big History of the universe. We now know where we come from and how we got here. Therefore the time has come to leave behind the creation stories of 1.x and 2.x religions that are belief based to knowledge based religions. Religions have to incorporate reality into their doctrine to Stay in the Game or they will be Left Behind.
The pursuit of the reality as it really is and the understanding of understanding is available to everyone. We are not an exclusive club and we do not discriminate based on minor genetic differences, cultural background, political affiliation, religious history, the geography of your birth location, sexual preferences, lines on a map, your gender, the shape of your body, or what frequencies of light are reflected off the surface of your skin (color). Although some people are smarter than others, everyone can improve themselves. So if you have two brain cells and are tired of living the lie, the Church of Reality is available to you. We are one planet. We are all part of the human race. We are all here together. We have to learn how to get along in a manner that is eqitable to everyone.
All people have intrinsic value. People are born in different locations and in different economic circumstances and different cultures. But we are all people and every individual has certain rights for just being a member of the human race. The Church of Reality recognizes that it is in the best interest of all of us to support social justice for everyone and to recognize that true wealth comes only when the basic needs of all of us are met. Inclusiveness insures that everyone has a place at the table.
Q) So Marc - dude! Aren't you scared that you are going to burn in Hell?
A) No!
Q) Are you absolutely sure? If so - why?
A) Yes - One must assume that if God did exist that he isn't a moron - isn't powerless - isn't a child murderer - doesn't have an ego problem - never required animal sacrifices - and isn't an insane crazy person
who reproduces by impregnating virgins. So - I think I'm pretty safe on this one.
Q) So - if this is all so stupid - then why do so many people believe it? I mean - really - can all those people believe something that is that ridiculous?
A) Yes - that is what's amazing - that all those people can believe this? It's a scary thought. But - there are a lot of religions who believe a variety of bizarre things.Some people believe in reincarnation.
Many believe there are lots of Gods. Muslim are waiting for their 70 virgins in the afterlife. Humans are above the animals - but not that far above. We are still a primitive species who are controlled more by our fears
and our heard animal social instincts. These instincts are far more powerful than our logic and it tricks people into believing in things with no rational basis.
Q) But - if Christians are wrong - so what? But if you are wrong - you burn in Hell forever!
A) If I'm right - and a person's entire existence is from birth to death - then Christians have wasted their entire existence on something that doesn't exist. If I'm wrong and the Bible is right - then Christians
spend eternity worshiping a madman. I think I've made it clear that I'm betting on reality. Reality is all we really have and if you miss out on reality - you miss out on everything. This planet is just a spec of dust
in the universe anyhow and we exist for but a flash of time so what does anything matter? But I'm going to take my little limited existence and try to at least understand what little I can about why anything exists. And
maybe get laid a few times while I still can.
Q) But Marc - what about all this love I feel? My heart tells me this all is true!
A) Yep - and all the other religions on the planet have members who feel that too. So - whose religion is the right one? People who believe opposite things all experience God and love and emotions that cause them
to believe. Muslims and Christians go to war and slaughter each other both believing they are acting as God's proxy and with God's support. What it shows is how easily people can be suckered.
Q) Why do you put down Christians and Jews more than all the other religions?
A) Because I'm more familiar with them and in America that's who surrounds me. I'm sure the rest of the world's major religions are at least as stupid - but I haven't wasted the time to learn them. I got better
things to do than to hang out with the Hare Krishna's.
Q) Do you think there's any chance at all that some day you will become a Christian and get saved and give up your logic and accept faith and let Jesus control you?
A) None - however - if I ever do become a Christian then I ask that someone kill me immediately because if I'm right then I will immediately go to Heaven and live with Jesus. And if I'm wrong then I lost my mind
and I don't want to live as a brainwashed cult member of some extreme religion. And - since I'm asking to be killed before I get saved then it's not like I'm committing suicide. And - after you kill me you can get saved
too - and forgiven - so that when they execute you for murder - then you can be with Jesus too.
Q) I was the sole survivor of a plane crash. I have to believe that God spared me.
A) OK - then you must also believe that God deliberately killed everyone else and that you are somehow better than all of them. Only the survivors tell their story. Wonder what the dead would say if they had a
chance. Of course - if you REALLY believed in God then only the unfortunate survive because the ones who die get to live with Jesus and the ones who survive are stuck here running the risk of ending up in Hell. I mean -
if you REALLY believe in Jesus then you want to die in that plane crash!
Q) But Marc - if this limited existence is all there is - then life on Earth sucks!
A) Well - depends on how you look at it. It's not much - but it's warmer than Mars!
Q) Marc - what makes you so damn smart?
A) I'm not from this planet. I don't know how I got here but some day a spaceship is going to show up and take me home. And all this will be but a dream.
The Story of Reality is very similar to the Story of the Universe except that it contemplates the possibility that our universe, which started at what we call the Big Bang, is part of a larger structure - a larger reality - that our universe is part of. The Story of Reality includes everything and is the super set that includes all other subsets of reality and all other stories. It is the story that includes everything that is real.
"But Marc", you now say, "You have made strong arguments here. You have shaken my faith. You are making me think about things that are very uncomfortable. You have put Satan's message into my brain and are now tempting me with a life of sin! Everything you say makes sense and now I'm scared. If I believe in reality I have to give up my whole church scene. I've believed in Jesus all my life and now I have doubts. Are you Satan? What are you doing to me?"
Up at the top of this page I warned people who have strong religious beliefs not to read this. If you are right in your religion then you have to assume that I am directly controlled by Satan and you just read Satan's message and are being seduced by Satan himself. I am - of course - completely and unknowingly controlled by the Devil and you now have his message firmly embedded into your brain. But - you were warned and you did it anyway. Now you're faced with believing in reality and losing your lifestyle and risking eternal damnation, or staying with the fantasy and asking God to forgive you for reading this web page and asking him to purge the evil thoughts from your brain.
This is like the movie "The Matrix" (A film that was written and produced by Satan himself!) where the main character is given the choice between two pills. The Blue Pill would let him go back into the fantasy world and continue to pretend and live in an artificial computer generated reality. The Red Pill however would let him see reality as it really is. In some ways we are similarly situated here. We can continue to try to force ourselves to live the lie and believe in the ridiculous, or we can decide to explore reality the way it really is. And - if you want to waste your limited existence with fantasy - you can do that. It's your choice.
By the way, for those who are wondering - yes - Satan does give me rewards for every soul I steal from Jesus.
Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
The Principle of Respect is the acceptance that every other person is a person just like you. That they are all individuals who are trying to survive and do the best they can with what they have to work with. The Principle of Respect is to accept that everyone is one of "us" and not just a member of a group of "them". To respect someone is to recognize that they have intrinsic value and to accept all individuals as fellow members of humanity.
We are a religion that gives respect and expects respect. Respect is the basis for the Principle of Inclusiveness, the Principle of Peace, and the Principle of Compassion. We honor the individual and we expect others to honor us. To us a stranger is just a friend who we haven't yet met.
Respect is also the core of the Vocabulary of Peace and it undermines the Vocabulary of War. To respect a person isn't to agree with them or to give any appoval to what they are into. But it does require that you think of them as a fellow human being who is a member of the human community and deserves a chance to establish a peaceful relationship. When you respet someone you personalize them, recognize their original virtue and identify with who they are. We give respect, and we expect to be respected. You are not a "them", you are an "us". We are an "us" too.
Big History is a term popularized by The Big History Project that looks at the Story of the Universe as a whole set of interconnected events. Big History represents the creation story of the Church of Reality which is based on our factual understanding of the history of the universe. Not the history we want to believe, or the history we choose to believe, but what actually happened.
The Principle of Self Scrutiny is the recognition that we are imperfect and that the pursuit of reality is always a goal and that knowledge is ever growing. It is the acknowledgement that sometimes we get it wrong and that we should always test ourselves and our world view to make sure that what we think is real actually is real. This is what we call the Purification of Truth. It is a test to ensure that we are not fooling ourselves. It makes sure that we are not living the lie. And it makes us accountable to the truth.
The Church of Reality is a doubt based religion as opposed to a (blind) faith based religion. Realists are required to doubt everything and to continually test both old and new ideas to verify that they are still true. Blind faith is irresponsible and bypasses accountability. We doubt everything because we care about reality. By doubting we accept responsibility for preserving the integrity of the truth.
We welcome doubt and scrutiny as a means of purifying truth. It makes us accountable and ensures the integrity of our beliefs.
We are of limited knowledge with a limited brain; primitive computers trying to understand our existence. We need to be humble in our understanding of understanding and fully aware of our flaws and the processes that would lead us to a path of self illusion. There are two kinds of people in the world, those who don't know and those who don't know that they don't know. Let us never become the latter.
We as Realists practicing Realism must therefore always rely on our doubt to test ourselves and to test our world view against reality. We need to continually reexamine our world view to look for errors or to have a deeper understanding of what we think we already know. There is always a certain amount of trash in the Tree of Knowledge. Much of this trash comes from old world views that were never challenged or the lies of people who would distort reality for selfish reasons. Purification of Truth requires doubt as the process of cleansing the Tree of Knowledge of error, and is a necessary process in Positive Evolution.
Staying in the game means to continue to exist. To avoid extinction. As long as humanity survives we are in the game. If we become extinct we are out of the game.
In the game and out of the game describes evolution and extinction in more personal terms. Generally one thinks of evolution and extinction as something that happens over a long period of time. Sometimes it can be quite sudden, especially extinction. We are only here because our ancestors stayed in the game. The did what it takes to survive. The term "in the game" also implies that one has to actively work to say in, and if one doesn't do what it takes to stay in the game then you lose, and you are out.
The Principle of Humility is to resist a false sense of self importance. This planet is but a speck of dust in the universe; a small rock orbiting a medium size star in a galaxy of billions of stars in a universe of trillions of galaxies. We exist but for an instant of time. There are possibly billions of other planets that have life that are far more advanced than we are that we wouldn't even be good enough to be considered food. So how important can we really be?
This principle is based on the idea that we should do the best we can and work together to try individually and collectively to figure out who we are and why we are here, where is here, and what being here means. Humility is to realize that our knowledge is very limited and that the more we learn the more we find that we don't know.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
The term "not even wrong" means that someone has asserted a position that is either so ridiculous or unsubstantiated that they haven't come up to the level of being wrong. To be wrong about something means that you have made an assertion that is at least reasonable enough to address as being right or wrong. And example of this is someone saying, "You can't proved God doesn't exist." doesn't rise to the level of even bring wrong. Since the term God means something different to everyone then one can't prove the nonexistence of something so undefined.
Realists are a thinking people who use reason to explore reality the way it really is. We love to discuss things, invent stuff, solve simple and complex problems. Reason and Wisdom are not the same thing. Reason allows us to design a nuclear bomb. Wisdom allows us to choose not to use it. Reason is more technical while wisdom is more visionary.
Realism is a religion of the mind. Our mind is our tool for understanding. We are also emotional beings and we are the product of evolution, living in a society that has evolved based on survival. But we have evolved to the point where we can apply reason to our life situation and try to understand things like spiritual experiences and separate our emotion from our thinking and understand who we are and how we work.
The Principle of Reason is also a personal commitment to apply reason to our daily lives. We ask ourselves if we are being reasonable. We want to know if decisions are based on reason. We are advocates for applying reason to situations and to think things through to ensure that we make a better decision than if we ignore reason. Some religions are spiritually driven where emotional states and fiction drive the world view. Some of these religions have an Extinctionist philosophy. Realists choose reason and we are committed to making sure that our world view is reason based. Reason is the path to reality.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
The Awakening is a Church of Reality term describing this age where humanity has evolved to the point where we are aware that reality exists. This is the age where we have realized that the universe contemplates itself through us. We have chosen that humanity should continue to exist and to evolve forward so that our understanding of reality increases over time. We have rejected the Path of Extinction and embraced Positive Evolution putting us on the path to the Star Trek Future. Because this is happening now for the first time in human existence this is the age of awakening. Individuals who accept this path and commit to putting the understanding of reality first in their lives are referred to as being Awakened.
The Principle of Wisdom is a personal commitment to not only work towards becoming smarter - but also wiser. Wisdom is the ability to arrive at the truth in spite of influences that would lead to the wrong conclusion. To be wise is to develop methods of extracting the truth against adversity.
We recognize that much of what we are taught is not true and that we become comfortable with our erroneous knowledge. We also recognize that there are complex emotions and expectations of society that pressure one's mind into fooling one's self. We recognize that there are people in the world who are not very honest who would use deception, illusion and the abuse of logic in order to get people to believe things that aren't true. But in spite of this - we are committed to extracting the truth and learning methods that allow reality to be known even in adverse circumstances.
To be wise is to have a highly disciplined mind and strong commitment to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. It represents not only personal skills, but also a strength of character to be able to face reality. It is to be a responsible person who can see past the confusion of the moment and to grasp the big picture. Wisdom requires strength of will, courage, discipline, humility, and commitment. Wisdom is something that is learned and everyone can become wiser than they are now.
As members of the Church of Reality we honor wisdom and we choose to commit ourselves to becoming wiser personally and to supporting the principle that we, as a society, are better off by elevating the status of Wisdom. As individuals we should be asking ourselves and asking other people, "Are we being Wise? Is there Wisdom here?"
What is the difference between the universe and reality. Sometimes these words are used interchangeably but there is a significant difference.
The term Universe started with the Big Bang and represents the sum total of everything that came from that event. There may be some greater reality out there that contains our universe and perhaps other universes or structures so great as to be incomprehensible. The distinction is our attempt to be as accurate as we presently can based on our limited understanding of reality. Perhaps in a billion years from now, if we continue to evolve forward we will know a lot more about reality than we do today.
The Principle of Personal Responsibility is the recognition that how we behave personally affects who we are as a species and how the Tree of Knowledge will evolve. We can choose to live our lives in a manner that is beneficial to society or to live in a way that is detrimental to society. What is good for humanity and what is bad for humanity is - like everything else - subject to debate and exploration. As a church we ask the question - "What is moral? What is right and wrong? What is good and evil?" These are questions that we ask as explorers in the pursuit of the understanding of understanding and to know the meaning of meaning.
We recognize that the concepts of good and bad exist and sometimes they are clear and sometimes they are not. But as individuals we recognize that if we are going to grow the Tree of Knowledge that we have to evolve in a positive direction and that our personal behavior makes a difference. As members of the church we choose to strive to do what is right.
The Church of Reality is more than just being on a membership list. It is not a title but a way of life. To be a realist individuals must perform the dharma of the church. Membership is a series of acts and the acceptance that what we do in life matters. In the living of our lives our conduct reflects our moral code that is to be judged against the Principle of Positive Evolution and if what we are doing is moving society in the Sacred Direction. Thus - as individuals we take responsibility for our decisions and are committed to pursue a life that is constructive rather than destructive. And that the pursuit of perfecting society and behaving in a manner to promote the growth of the Tree of Knowledge constitutes the basis for a moral code under which we can all live together in peace and harmony to allow people to flourish individually and as a species.
The Principle of Personal Responsibility recognizes that what we do as an individual matters. Everyone affects the Tree of Knowledge in some way. We recognize that people have the ability to choose and that different choices have different results. Self improvement often requires change and the pursuit of reality, the way it really is, often has a price. And to pursue reality often involves taking control of our personal lives and affirmatively determining the direction our limited existence will take; to decide what we will become rather than be driven by the circumstances around us. Although we often have little control of what hand life deals us, we choose how to play the hand we are dealt. We choose to be good upstanding members of society working towards moving mankind in the Sacred Direction.
Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
The Church of Reality has a higher burden of proof than other religions because we are a reality based religion and we can't just make stuff up because we want to believe in it. We have to have a reason to believe what we believe that we can articulate and is subject to the Scrutiny of the world. Because we are Realists we accept the Burden of Proof as our standard to justify what we claim to be true.
The Principle of Bullshit recognizes that things that aren't true just aren't true. It doesn't matter how many people believe it - it doesn't matter that people have believed it for thousands of years - it doesn't matter if you want to believe it - bullshit is bullshit - and if it isn't true - it isn't true. There is a difference between something being true and something not being true.
The Principle of Bullshit is all about refusing to live the lie; to be able to call something the way it really is. It is the ability to face the reality of being wrong so as to create a starting point to make a better choice. It is to accept that you can't truly pursue reality if you continue to believe in things that aren't real. You may have made a mistake - or millions of people might have made the same mistake for thousands of years. But when you know it's all bullshit then you have to call it - accept it - and move in the Sacred Direction. If you're a Realist then by definition you are supposed to give up what's not real - or at least admit your denial if you aren't ready to face reality.
Bullshit is bullshit no matter how many people believe in it.
Truth must be purified through scrutiny and doubt. There is nothing that rises above these tests. Anything that is prohibited from being questioned, is not subject to doubt or scrutiny, is assumed to be bullshit per se. If you are required to believe something without question then that something is bullshit, even if it turns out to be true. (Of course it couldn't turn out to be true unless it were tested against some objective standard. And if so tested, it would be subject to doubt and therefore no longer bullshit per se.)
There are those who would twist the truth, be misleading, tell half truths, hide the truth, use double meanings and distort definitions, be deceitful and deceptive, and flat out lie. People would require you to accept beliefs on faith and prohibit you from questioning those beliefs. Faith is often used to deceive people because it prohibits scrutiny, doubt, and accountability. This is not the way of the Church of Reality. We embrace doubt and scrutiny for the purification of truth.
The Tree of Knowledge is built on what is real and what is true. Bullshit that is passed off as reality poisons the Tree of Knowledge and creates a weakness in knowledge itself. It creates a rotten spot in the Tree. It inhibits growth and holds back our development as a race of humans. It keeps us from developing in a positive direction. Part of the Sacred Duties of the Church of Reality is the purification of knowledge through the expression of doubt. We choose to expunge the bullshit through doubt and scrutiny and to replace it with what's real. The Principle of Bullshit asserts a duty to resist the powers of bullshit by questioning everything. This moves us towards reality the way it really is. It requires courage, humility, wisdom, doubt, and strength of character to go against the cult mind and refuse to live the lie.
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Every religion has a "Meaning of Life" that creates a sense of meaning and purpose for existence. We in the Church of Reality are no different and our meaning of life is actually better than other religion's meaning of life because our meaning of life is based in reality itself.
As a reality base religion the Burden of Proof when it comes to grand statements like defining the meaning of life in an atheistic context. So what is our meaning of life? What is our grand purpose? And how to we justify it in the context of reality?
Some might argue that "meaning" itself has no meaning and that the concept of a "meaning of life" itself is an artificial construct. Who are we to artificially give value to what happens in the universe and determine that one outcome is better than another? What is the basis to even say that our existence is better than our extinction?
Another way of looking at the word "meaning" however is to equate it to purpose. Does it cause something to occur? In this case life caused intelligence to occur (humans), and that intelligence was capable of contemplating reality itself. Without life the universe becomes dumb. Life is necessary for the universe to be aware that it exists (universal self awareness). Therefore life has the purpose of creating universal self awareness. One might argue the purpose isn't important, but important or not - it is a purpose.
We are a creation of the universe. We are part of the universe and we represent what the universe evolved into; at least this small piece of the universe represented by our planet. The universe on this planet after 13.7 billion years has evolved life and we are that life. We have evolved to the point where we are aware of reality itself. Thus it can be said that reality itself become self aware through us.
We are the mind of reality contemplating its own existence.
If there is other intelligent life in the universe then they too are reality contemplating itself. So whether we are alone in the universe or we are just one of billions of planets containing intelligent life, we represent the method that the universe becomes self aware.
So if there is such a thing as value and meaning and that some outcome can be considered to be better than another outcome then we in the Church of Reality declare that reality becoming aware of its own existence and evolving to expand its understanding of itself through life constitutes a higher purpose.
Perhaps it is a property of the universe to start out dumb, evolve life, and that the life evolves into intelligent life. At some point the life becomes aware of the universe and reality and life itself becomes the path for the universe to attain self awareness. Thus the self awareness of the universe becomes the meaning of life.
The meaning of life is for the universe itself to attain self awareness through evolution.
Some might say that it is a conceit for humanity, who is just at the very beginning stages of contemplating reality to claim to be the mind of the universe. Such a criticism would be correct. But every species has to start somewhere and our path is just beginning. We might be like early animals on this planet where they just put together enough nerve cells to be called a brain.
Humanity is at that same early stage. We are just beginning to contemplate the idea of reality. We just developed the technology to be aware of what our universe is. We have some idea of its size and age. We have the beginnings of understanding what matter and energy is. That the universe contains start and galaxies. We can peer back into time to within a billion years of creation.
Humanity is like a new born baby when it comes to understanding reality but we have crossed the line of being born. We are aware reality exists and that we are real. We are now just awakening to the idea that we are reality contemplating itself. And we are grappling with the decision that perhaps we should choose to continue to exist and that we should choose to commit our existence to the expansion of the understanding of reality. We are at the moment of The Awakening, where humanity becomes aware of reality.
Often societies and religions deteriorate because good people stand by idly and let bad things happen. To do nothing and allow something to happen can often be as bad as causing it to happen. Everything needs maintenance in order to preserve what has been accomplished. There are times when we can not stand by and allow things to go in the wrong direction. Reality is something that is actively pursued and it requires an active effort not only to pursue it - but to maintain the systems that allow it to be pursued. We therefore choose to commit to being actively involved in moving forward and to prevent those who would move us backward from succeeding.
It is the dharma of the Church of Reality to spread the Sacred Message - which is reality - and to promote reality not only in our own daily lives but in the groups that we belong to. It is up to us to raise the status of reality in society. We commit to promoting reality wherever we are. Reality has healing properties. It helps to free people from the slavery of the Cult Mind. Every time you say the word you cause people to think about reality and that causes them to be real in the Sacred Moment. It promotes Positive Evolution by helping humanity make better choices.
Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
A dumb universe is a universe where no life exists that has evolved to the point where the species has some comprehension that the universe exists. In the beginning the universe was dumb. There was no life. Eventually life evolved. Whenever the first species in the universe evolved to the point where it became aware that the universe existed, then the universe became a Smart Universe.
If there were other species in the universe that evolved before we did then the universe was already a smart universe before we figured it out. If however we are the only advanced life form in the universe then the universe became smart in the last for hundred years. If we are the only advanced life in the universe and we become extinct then the universe goes back to being a dumb universe.
Our worldview is that in order to be free we must have a deep respect for the individual's personal privacy. We are living in an age of expanding technology - a technology that has the ability to let too many people know too much about us and to use that information against us in order to cripple our freedom to explore. Public scrutiny often has a chilling effect on our exploration and causes us to fear the pursuit of the understanding of understanding. In order to grow as a species we must protect our privacy as a means of giving individuals the power to discover new knowledge and contribute that knowledge back into the Tree of Knowledge. In order to freely exercise our beliefs and promote personal freedom we must be allowed to preserve our personal privacy.
A Smart Universe is a universe that contain at least one form of life that has evolved to the point where it is aware the universe exists. Since all life in the universe was created by the universe through an evolutionary process, we are the universe. Therefore because we are the universe and we are aware of the universe, the universe is self aware through us.
We are, along with other advanced life forms in the universe, the universe contemplating itself, learning about itself. Our existence makes the universe a smart universe. If we ceased to exist and there is no other highly evolved life in the universe then the universe would again become a Dumb Universe.
To be clear, (The Atheist Disclaimer), we are not suggesting that the universe has a mind independent of ourselves and is some sort of father/deity figure. We are more like the universe's first brain cells.
We as a human race learn from our past and our past is a basis for what we decide to do in the future. As technology increases we can better analyze preserved information. Thus - the preservation of information and knowledge is one of our Sacred Duties. The Tree of Knowledge can not grow unless we preserve its information. Data is sacred because data helps us understand the truth. One example of the preservation of historical data is the Wayback Machine at Archive.org. It is storing the historical content of the Internet. And because they are storing the history of the Internet they preserve data for future understanding. The Archive of the Internet is one of our Sacred Databases and the Church of Reality hereby declares it as a Sacred Shrine and we are interested in not only its preservation, but its ability to gather and store data. Some day we will be able to go back and extract knowledge about ourselves that will be possible only because we save that information today.
It is also our duty to preserve history from distortions that create false knowledge about what really happened in history. We recognize that there are those people who would conceal and distort the historical record or try to forget important things that should not be forgotten. Often in war the history books are written by the victor and the truth is slanted in a way that doesn't represent the way things really happened.
The Church of Reality promotes looking at historical events the way they actually occurred without giving flavor to events to obscure unpleasantness. It is our view that history happened the way it happened and should be viewed in terms of what actually occurred. And we have a Sacred Duty to preserve historical data so that in the future when we have better technology we can extract a more accurate picture of the past.
Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
The term Real Reality is somewhat redundant in that reality by definition (at least our definition) is the sum total of everything that actually is real. However there are those who like to do some definition twisting and word games around the word reality so we have created a definition for Imaginary Reality which is by definition a contradiction. This terms are tools for helping to explain to people who insist on believing what they want and calling it real that we in the Church of Reality consider reality something sacred and that definition twisting is not a part of reality based culture. We believe what reality turns out to be, not that reality turn into what we want to believe it is.
Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.
Life should be fun and funny. This church is a religion that appreciates having a good time. We work hard and we play hard. We want to make sure that we don't get too serious. Life is to be lived and enjoyed and it is our world view that we should go out and have a good time, live it up, and make life fun and funny. Quality of life is important to us.
An Imaginary Reality is a description of another reality that isn't actually real. It is a description of reality based in fiction where those who believe in the reality choose to do so without any objective evidence, or in spite of objective evidence, that the reality actually exists. Such realities are often described in sacred religious books where the believer has to assume based on Faith that the book is true.
The term Imaginary Reality is a contradiction but is useful when discussing reality with those who insist on believing in something that isn't real but people insist on believing anyway. It's also a foundation for talking about the Faith Paradox where without reality based scrutiny there's no way to determine if one person's faith based belief is more true than another person's faith based belief.
The difference between Real Reality and imaginary reality is that real reality is observable by non-believers and holds up to Scrutiny. If an imaginary reality is tested and determined to be real then it would switch from the imaginary category to the real category. If, for example, science discovers that Heaven exists then Heaven moves into the reality based world and members of the Church of Reality would believe in it.
Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.
The term "pond scum" refers to our evolutionary past, to the origin of life on this planet. It is a metaphor for the moment of creation in the evolutionary sense. Although we didn't actually evolve from pond scum it is a common image representing the origin of life.
Ultimate Reality refers to the sum total of everything that is real in all contexts. It is the container that contains everything that is real and for which there is nothing that is real that is not part of the Ultimate Reality.
Human language is often imprecise. Some might say that the Universe is all of reality. But our universe might be a subset of some greater structure out there. Some people talk about "other realities" which is often nonsense but could refer to other contexts that actually exist but for which we have no contact. It would not however include references to worlds that do not exist.
If looked at in the context of set theory, the Ultimate Reality would be the largest reality set containing all realities and for which there is no bigger set that contain more things that are real. The only things outside of this set is that which is not real. The Church of Reality is a MonoRealistic religion, and the one reality we believe in is the ultimate Reality.
Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
The Fruits Test refers to a Bible scripture where Jesus says, "You will know them by their fruits." This was the way that one could tell true believers from those who do not truly believe.
The Church of Reality members are always being challenged by believers who claim that they have a personal relationship with a deity that has changed their life and made them a better person. Many religions claim to have an affiliation with the supernatural claiming that God is on their side and that they are somehow benefited from the relationship in a way that Atheists can't match.
There are those who claim that for some reason God isn't directly observable. But if someone has on some level merged with the spirit of an omnipotent deity, then there should be an observable affect on that person. If a religious group claims an affiliation with an omnipotent deity then that groups behavior should reflect a measurable benefit from that relationship.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
Different religions see the future differently. Many religions see the future from an Extinctionist point of view where the world is destroyed either by humanity itself or by and angry deity. The Church of Reality is a Futurist religion and our goal is the Star Trek Future.
The television series Star Trek which we call the Holy TV Show, created by Gene Roddenberry in the 1960s, is a fictional depiction of the future of humanity where humans have developed space craft that can travel faster than the speed of light to go out and explore the universe. In this future humanity has evolved beyond war and poverty, cured diseases, and we are all Explorers on a quest for knowledge.
Although in the real future we are not likely to break the speed of light barrier and find planets full of humanoid life, sexy green skinned women, all who speak perfect English, and form a Federation of Planets, the series makes many important points about a new view of the future that we in the Church of Reality aspire to create.
We see a future that when we look back at history from their point of view that we are proud of what humanity has accomplished and have a continued sense that we are on the right track. That we have become explorers, to explore strange new worlds; to seek out new life and new civilizations; to boldly go where no one has gone before. It is this vision that fires the souls of Realists and we as a culture are committed to making the Star Trek Future actually happen.
Although the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights is a good start, we in the Church of Reality see it as something to build upon. We see it as something that can be improved and expanded rather than a static historical document that will slowly become obsolete over time. In addition to these rights and others stated in the Kernel, we add the following to the list as human rights recognized by our religion.
Cheating in the Church of Reality refers to a dishonest argument or kind of behavior where a person expects a shortcut or pass when none is deserved.Examples of cheating include:
Absolution from Sin - There is no deity that is going to clean up after you and expunge your {ln:Karmic Record).
God did it - The argument that anything that can't yet be explained scientifically is the work of a deity.
God told me to do it - Can't blame your actions on the deity or enhance something that you accomplished by inferring an alliance with a deity.
Definition Twisting - In order to explain away contradictions definitions of words are twisted and switched. An example would be "Maybe God means the universe and the universe exists, therefore God exists.
Credit but not Blame - If God saved someone from the plane crash, then why did he allow the plane to crash in the first place?
Every person has the right to speak for one's self, on one's own behalf. An individual may choose to be represented by another individual or group, but they cannot be compelled to give up their individual voice in favor of the group voice or personal representative.
Courts of law must allow the individual to represent themselves and to have procedures that allow the individual to speak on their own behalf, free from the threat of legal penalty or requirement that one must be represented by a lawyer. And individual representing themselves in a court of law shall be accommodated by the court and shall not be persecuted or discriminated against in any way for deciding not to have a lawyer.
A person represented by a labor union shall have a way to bypass union processes and to be allowed to speak on their own behalf to management concerning any issue.
A person has the right to address the state without being forced to have a state approved representative speak in their behalf.
In the religious debate the view of the Church of Reality is that the pursuit of the understanding of reality, the way it really is, has value. This is our Sacred Axiom. It is not our mission to prove what doesn't exist, but to focus on what does exist. Staying on subject is to keep turning the conversation back to reality. If we are spreading the Sacred Message it is important that we make sure that the conversation is about reality. So if we discuss the existence of God then we do so in the context of reality based testing or from a reality based perspective.
We see conversation as a kind of sport. In sports sometimes the game is played on the home field and sometimes it is played away on their home field. There is a concept in sports that one plays better when they have the home field advantage. Reality is our home field. God is their home field. If we are going to have the home field advantage we have to stay on subject.
No one shall be compelled to publicly recite pledges to any nation-state, to worship any deity, or to make an oath to any organization. Every person has the right to refuse state compelled expression.
The term "Waste of Neurons" is a recognition that there is only so much room in the brain and that one's mental resources are valuable and should be used to store important information. It is similar to not downloading junk files on your computer that take up space and prevent you from storing useful information.
Obsessive Atheism, for example can become a waste of neurons in that if one spends all their time thinking about what isn't real then the brain becomes full of trivia and there isn't room for what is real. The Church of Reality considers memorizing the sacred text of other religions to be a waste of neurons that could better be used to understand the reality we live in. One of our disciplines is Staying on Subject which means to bring the debate back to reality.
No person shall be denied the right to fair use of intellectual property, nor punished unreasonably for violations of copyright laws, or punished for innocent infractions of intellectual property rights.
No person shall be denied the use of intellectual property through unreasonably long patent and copyright protection.
The right of reverse engineering shall be preserved
The "Next World" is the place where people go when they die. it is based on the belief that one has an immortal soul that lives forever in some form. After one dies the soul might go to a world of infinite reward or infinite punishment depending on if the believer met the qualifications in this life.
It might also mean a person's next incarnation, that if you are a good person in this life then the next time you will come back as a better person, or excape the reincarnation cycle altogether.
Belief in the next world is considered to be a Distraction by Realists in that we are focused on this world and this reality that we actually all are part of and that unless science discovers an afterlife the next world is a Waste of Neurons.
The right of sexual choice between consenting adults shall be preserved. Sexual morality shall not be imposed by the state or by religions, beyond the scope of their membership. Individuals shall be free from persecution or humiliation on the basis of their sexual orientation or sexual choices.
A person shall have the right to refuse sexual contact and to be protected from the unwelcome sexual advances of others. No person shall be required to endure rape by the state, in prison, or through inadequate laws protecting the individual from rape.
No person shall be forced to marry another person against their will.
Children shall be protected by law from sexual contact with adults.
Sexual laws shall not discriminate on the basis of gender.
Anti-realism is a world view that this reality we live is an illusion or unimportant, or an evil world that is not worthy of understanding. Anti-realists are taught to understand through Faith and to actively suppress logic and reason in favor of focusing on a mythical Next World.
Although the Church of Reality encourages forgiveness and rehabilitation, we do not absolve sinners. Forgiveness is between the parties involved and can not be given out by a third party such as a church or deity. Our view is that absolution from sin is irresponsible and it gives the sinner a false sense that their record is somehow expunged.
Our view is that everything a person does is forever part of their Life Story and the Story of the Universe. What you do becomes what you did and that once it is done then it is part of history and one can not change history. Once a bell is rung it cannot be unrung. This encourages Realists to take responsibility for their actions and to not do bad things in the first place.
Government has a duty to be open and accountable to the people. Government exists only to serve the people and for no other purpose. The people have the right to expect honesty, integrity and respect from government officials.
The right and duty of the people to rise up against oppression shall be preserved
"The guy who invented the wheel" is a metaphor for the beginning of the Tree of Knowledge which is the sum total of human understanding. It envisions a cave man carving a wheel out of stone or wood making a technological breakthrough that allowed humans to survive and thrive in a primitive world. We don't actually know if there was a "guy" or a woman or if the invention started in one place by one person. The wheel is symbolic of an early invention.
The wheel was predated by stone tools such as axes and knives and wasn't as significant of an invention as the bow, lances, and other projectile weapons. But we use it as an expression to represent early discoveries in the early evolution of humanity.
Women shall have reproductive choice. No government shall deny a woman access to birth control or abortions. A woman has an absolute right to decide not to reproduce.
The Sacred Axiom is the fundamental idea that forms the basis of the Church of Reality religion. The Sacred Axiom is that the pursuit of the understanding of reality by humans has value. The name Church of Reality implies that we are a religion that believes in everything that is real and doesn't believe in what isn't real. If we knew everything that was and wasn't real then it would be simple. However since we are in the process of exploring reality then a more accurate description is that we are in the process of pursuing an accurate understanding of reality, and that reality is our standard for determining what to believe and what not to believe.
Our Sacred Axiom is - The Understanding of Reality by Humans has Value
The Sacred Axiom establishes the pursuit of the understanding of reality to be our religious value that forms a basis for our religious identity. It is the root axiom for which our moral and ethical systems are based and it gives us a purpose in the universe. This purpose is a self chosen purpose and is somewhat of an artificial construct that we, as Realists, accept as a religious choice.
The Sacred Axiom used to be the lowest level axiom for the basis of the Church of Reality but we have actually realized an even more primitive axiom that our Sacred Axiom can be derived from. Our new Root Axiom is that to exist is better than to not exist. Our Sacred Axiom, the pursuit of the understanding of reality is actually a method of achieving the root axiom. In order to live in Right Relationship to Reality we have to understand reality. Otherwise we will be Left Behind.
Your Story is a reference to your Life Story. It's the sum total of everything you have done in your life up to the present. The term "Your Story" is more often used to refer to what you are presently doing, or what you are involved in. Someone might ask, "What's your story?" as a way of asking you what your life is about and what values you stand for.
Everyone has a right to expose corruption by individuals, businesses, government officials, or any other entity who is committing acts that are unfair or immoral.
Everyone deserves the protection of the law for exposing corruption even if they have violated other laws for the purpose of exposing the corruption.
No law shall be construed or applied in a manner that punishes those who expose corruption. Secrecy laws are intended to protect the public, not to conceal corruption and abuse.
The Story of Humanity is the sum total everything that has happened to anyone since the beginning of humanity. Your Life Story becomes part of the Story of Humanity. The Story of Humainity is part of the Story of Life, the Story of the Earth, and the Story of the Universe.
The Story of Life actually refers to the story of life on Earth. The story of life is the entire history of life on this planet since life formed on this planet. It is the history of the Tree of Life. Your personal Life Story is part of the Story of Life. The Story of Life is part of the Story of the Earth and the Story of the Universe.
The story of the Earth is the sum total of everything that happened on this planet since the Earth was formed. It includes the Story of Life and the Story of Humanity as well as the stories of all other species in the planet that exist and have ever existed.
The Story of the Universe is the sum total of everything that happened everywhere in the universe from the beginning of time. It is the Life Story of the cosmos. Everything you do from the moment you are born to the moment you dies is part of the Story of the Universe. What happens becomes what happened and what you do becomes what you did.
A popular name for the Story of the Universe is Big History. It's big because it includes everything that actually happened. Big History and the Story of the Universe are almost but not quite the Story of Reality. The Story of Reality contemplates that our universe might be part of some larger structure that we are not yet aware of.
Meatspace, a term coined by John Perry Barlow, refers to the physical world inhabited by humans. It refers to the world where people meet in person as opposed to online. Meatspace is actually a subset of reality in that it is the part of reality where people reside. Meatspace does not include cyberspace which is also part of the real world but not the physical world, nor does it include other planets where humans have yet to colonize. It is also meant to be the opposite of the afterlife, the next world, and other references to real or imagined places where people don't go in physical form. Hugging occurs in meatspace.
The Language of Peace are words and ideas used to counter the Language of War. War is most often preventable through using Wisdom to produce creative solutions to avert war. The Language of Peace is used to ratchet down the tensions so that Reason can prevail over passions.
The Language of War is the talk and propaganda that is issued to lead up to war. War doesn't happen all of a sudden. War takes coordination and agreement and is preceded by war language to create a narrative to justify and create a reason or excuse for a war. The Language of War is a predictor that war is coming. The Language of War can often be countered with the Language of Peace in order to avert war.
The Path of Reality is the path your life takes when you decide to make Realism your Life Story. It is a transformational process where you see the world in terms of reality and you start to rethink the way you think and you take on the Realist identity.
The Sacred Vision is our collective and individual vision of the future. It is what we see as our idea of where we should be going. It's imagining humanity progressing into a harmonious society where we are traveling space and exploring the reality of the universe. The Sacred Vision is to dream the dream of the perfect tomorrow.
Irresponsible Religion is the opposite of Responsible Religion. Irresponsible religions are Cult like in nature. They use dishonesty and trickery to force people to believe their Bullshit.
There are many aspects of modern day religions that are irresponsible. many of these religions support Extinctionism believing that the world is going to end and that their bad behavior doesn't have consequences. Many religions offer Absolution from Sin giving people a false sense that their karmic record has been expunged and absolving them from the responsibility from their actions. This enables criminals to continue a life of crime because they are "forgiven" and that God will make it up to their victims in the next life.
Many religion preach a doctrine of Anti-Realism, that this world is an evil world and that one should not identify as a member of this world, but rather the next world. They argue that this reality isn't worth understanding and that one should ignore this reality in favor of a fictional reality one goes to after death.
Responsible religion is a religion that is honest about what they believe in and has a commitment to making the future better than the past. Responsible religion isn't afraid of reality. Responsible religion accepts scrutiny and criticism. Responsible religion allows you to question everything.
Responsible religion denounces torture or murder of people. It doesn't look forward to the end of the world. Responsible religion protects the environment and treats our planet as our home. Responsible religion sees humanity as one big community that includes everybody.
"Yes we can!" is our statement of determination to succeed. There are those who say that the Church of Reality isn't a real religion. Many believe that we will digress into corruption and become another money grubbing religious scam. Some say that our moral values will never rise to the level of other religions. Many believe that we'll never amount to anything, that we are just a fad, and that we'll soon be forgotten. They say that humanity is too corrupt and doesn't deserve to survive. That human nature is inherently evil or that we are unworthy. They say that the end of the world is inevitable. To those who doubt if we can make it happen our reply is, "Yes we can!"
Anything you can do we can do better. We can do anything better than you. Yes we can, yes we can!
The universe isn't fair or compassionate. Unless a deity shows up and becomes an omnipotent father figure, we have to assume that we are alone and that we are responsible for our own survival. Very few planets can sustain life let alone intelligent life. There is no other planet in the universe that has people like us. We exist because we survive and if we fail to continue to survive, then we will no longer exist. If we, as a species, fail to make good choices, we will end up on the Path of Extinction.
"Yes we can" is like the Principle of Positive Evolution. It's not a belief that we can base on nothing, or hope, or Faith. It is a statement of determination that we commit ourselves to making it happen. We commit to getting the job done. We are going to defy the odds. We are going to succeed. We are going to survive and prosper. We will make tomorrow better than today and to those who think we can't do it, Yes we can!
Being distracted is when you are tricked into focusing on what isn't real at the expense of what is real. If you are Obsessing over a False Truth then you are said to be distracted. One doesn't gain much of an understanding of what is real by obsessing on what isn't real. In the Church of Reality we focus on the Sacred Truth and put Reality First.
An example of being distracted in the Church of Reality is focusing of disproving the existence of God. This is a trap that Atheism has fallen into. Everyone knows that the average Atheist knows the Bible better than the average Christian. But because Atheism focuses on what isn't real there is very little attention paid to what is real. So Atheists are correct that God doesn't exist. But Atheists are distracted because the issue isn't God, it's reality.
Obsessing over a False Truth is when you are Distracted into focusing on what isn't real at the expense of what is real. Atheists, for example, are distracted because if you obsess on God then you're not talking about Reality. Obsessing over a False Truth is a bad habit. It is cured by spending time contemplating reality and in Communion.
When someone puts Faith or a deity before the Sacred Truth we call that worshiping a false truth. A False Truth is the belief in something that isn't true or isn't real. It's when you have turned your back on reality and chosen a Golden Calf instead. It when you have rejected Scrutiny and accepted Bullshit.
In the Church of Reality we Accept the Truth by putting Reality First. We believe that the Sacred Truth is purified through Scrutiny and that anything that doesn't stand up to Doubt is considered not true. Realists do not worship false truths.
Our reality in the Church of Reality is a jealous reality. Thou shall have no realities before the one true reality, the sum of everything that is actually real. We put reality first. Reality comes before faith and it comes before any deities. When you Accept the Truth you do that by putting Reality First.
A Golden Calf is a metaphor taken from the Jewish Bible referring to the belief in and worship of a false god. In the Church of Reality a Golden Calf refers to holding on to a belief that isn't real. It's when you don't put Reality First and decide to Worship a False Truth instead.
Living in the Truth means that you have taken control of your Life Story and that you have dedicated yourself to the Realist way of thinking. Living in the Truth is the actual practice of Realist principles. It's more than just "believing in reality" it's fulling embracing doubt, expanding your curiosity about things, experiencing the desire to understand everything.
Living in the Truth means that you really really believe in reality. That you don't have a Golden Calf in your closet that you secretly worship. It means that you no longer throw virgins into volcanoes. It's when your past life is remembering when you believed in past lives.
Acceptance of Truth is our religious commitment to the Sacred Truth, the real truth, or otherwise know as the Hard Truth. Becoming a Realist is more than just saying that you believe in reality. To be a Realist you have to accept the Sacred Truth and commit to using the Sacred Method to determine what you believe in. Accepting the Truth means that you are willing to give up Bullshit, apply Scrutiny, and change your mind if you are wrong. It means putting Reality First.
In Accepting the Truth you are telling the world that you are all the way in when it comes to Reality. It's saying that we're not going to just pretend we're into reality, we're not going to twist definitions to defend what we want to believe in, and we aren't going to make deceptive arguments to trick people into believing in anything that doesn't stand up to scrutiny. It means that you're ready to feast at the Tree of Knowledge. It means that you are curious and that you want to understand everything. It means that you're ready to contemplate the Sacred Contemplations. It means that your Life Story is going to change and you will become a vessel through which Reality becomes aware of it's own existence.
Religious Identity is about what you believe in. It's the passion that fires the soul. It's about your standards and who you choose to be in the world. It sets the standards for determining what is right and wrong. Religious Identity is about Values and it determines how you envision the Future.
In the Church of Reality we accept the Sacred Truth and we become Realists. We commit ourselves to the Positive Evolution of humanity so that through Intellectual Tithing we can expand the understanding of our existence. Our real existence. The way it really is with all the Bullshit removed. Acceptance of Truth means we will go where ever the Truth leads us.
We call it the Sacred Truth because Truth is holy to us. The Sacred Truth is the ultimate truth. It's the truth that you get when you stop playing with the definition of "truth" and accept that Truth means that which is actually true in reality. Truth to us is like mathematical truth. It's Truth that is purified by Scrutiny and Doubt. It is Truth that is determined to be true using the Sacred Method by those who have accepted reality by putting Reality First.
The Sacred Truth is a jealous truth and it demands that there are no other truth's before it. We do not Worship a False Truth. The Church of Reality is a MonoRealistic religion in that we believe there is one reality that encompasses all other realities that are actually real.
The Sacred Truth requires Acceptance of Truth which is the commitment that we Realist make to the pursuit of the understanding of reality as it really is.
The Hard Truth is another name for the Sacred Truth except that it speaks of the effort and willingness to give up on what you want to believe and accepting what really is. Reality isn't what we want it to be, nor is it what other people want us to believe it is. The Hard Truth is reality the way it really is. It is often hard to give up believing the beliefs we are comfortable with and believe instead what really is true as determined by the Sacred Method.
The Vocabulary of Reality is the Terminology that we have developed to explain the new concepts of the Church of Reality. Our religion has broken new ground and developed new concepts in religious philosophy. In order to describe our world view we have had to develop new words to describe our new concepts.
The Church of Reality has concepts found in no other religion. Many of the concepts are complex and it requires new words to describe these concepts. Once you Accept the Truth there is a learning curve to understand the Kernel. Our vocabulary isn't that difficult but it is worth the time to read through it and learn it.
Followers are people who follow the teachings of others and accept those teachings on Faith and without Scrutiny. We in the Church of Reality are Explorers. We accept scrutiny and we believe in what what can be determined to be real using the Sacred Method. We are a Doubt Based religion.
In the Church of Reality our Sacred method is the Scientific Method. The Sacred Method is what we use to determine what we believe in. We have our Principle of Scrutiny which requires that we question everything. Our world view is that truth is purified through doubt. That is why we identify ourselves as a Doubt Based Religion.
The Church of Reality would not be the Church of Reality unless we have a strong commitment to the pursuit of reality as it really is. Although we can and will make mistakes in our pursuit of reality we must not compromise our principles and methods that lead us there. There are disciplines that get us to the truth and allow us to continually reexamine what we believe to make sure that what we believe in actually is real. That is why the Scientific method is sacred to us because without the disciplines it requires we could end up just being Followers rather than Explorers.
Reality Positive means something that is positive about reality as opposed to negative about non-reality. The Church of Reality is a reality positive religion because we focus on what we do believe in as opposed to what we don't believe in. In contrast Atheism focuses on what isn't real. Our existence is limited to a small amount of time. If we spend that time focusing on what isn't real then we miss out on what is real. Our motto is, "If it's real, we believe in it.", as opposed to, "If it's not real then we don't believe in it."
Ego Addiction is when a person becomes addicted to the feeling of self importance. We call it ego addiction because having too much ego becomes a bad habit and a person who has an ego addiction will sacrifice reality for an inflated sense of self importance.
Cults use Ego Addiction to control their members. They give people an inflated sense of self importance. They are told that they were "chosen by God" and that they are part of an elite group of God's warriors who are on some sort of holy mission to fulfill some divine plan. That they are the good and holy people who are "at war" with the "enemy" who is "evil" and under the control of "Satan" or some other demonic powers. You believe that you as an individual are playing an important role in this apocalyptic battle between the forces of good and evil and can only win if you maintain your Faith in what you are told to believe. You are told that if you Doubt then evil wins.
If this describes your situation then you have a problem with ego addiction. Your role in the real world is far less glamorous than you ego-addiction suggests. Consider that life in the universe is probably so sparse that if this planet were to blow up it is likely that nothing out there would even notice, let alone care. So even though our role in the universe isn't nearly as thrilling as your role might be, at least we aren't wasting our existence being someone else's sucker.
The Church of Reality takes the position that if we focus on what is real and continue to evolve then some day we might become something far greater than what we are today. But we can't get there if we allow ourselves to indulge in an inflated sense of self importance. We give up being important so we can get some real work done.
The Path of Illusion refers to someone who has chosen to turn their back to Realism and base their beliefs on Faith rather than putting Reality First. It refers to the lost souls who have chosen not to Accept the Truth and waste their limited existence pursuing the unreal rather than what's real. The Path of Illusion often include Worshiping a False Truth.
Personal Illusion represents the things that a person believes in that aren't real. This includes things believed on the basis of faith or other means that exclude Scrutiny.
The One True Reality is the one reality that is the sum total of everything that is real. The Church of Reality is a Monorealistic religion. We believe in one reality that encompasses all other realities that actually are real.
Some people who are Polyrealistic talk about "other realities" but our reality includes what other people might call other realities that are actually real as opposed to imaginary realities which are not real. Anything that actually is real is included and everything that is not real is excluded.
Some people talk about a "personal reality" which is really their viewpoint on reality or a localized subset of reality that applies to their personal experience. Some people confuse this with their personal opinion or Personal Illusion.
Polyrealism is a word that describes the assertion that there are "multiple realities" often referred to "other world" or "other planes of existence" or "the afterlife". These include views of realities based on faith or personal belief systems that exclude objective reality or put ones personal view of reality ahead of what really exists.
Most religions are polyrealistic religions because they believe in the "supernatural" which are things that are outside of the "natural" world. The Church of Reality is a Monorealistic religion in that we believe that there is one true reality, that reality being the sum total of everything that actually is real.
The Faith Paradox is the contention that nothing believed through faith is provable because if something can be proven then you don't need faith to believe in it. Faith excludes logic and reason and does not accept scrutiny. When one believes by faith then one is expected to stay faithful in spite of any facts, logic, or evidence.
The faith paradox is the contention than if two people believe opposite things that they can not determine who is right and who is wrong through faith and are forced to turn to reality to establish if what they believe is real. But in turning to reality the element of faith is undermined. Thus when one accepts faith one rejects reality.
Monorealism is the belief in one reality. That all things that are real are part of reality and that anything that isn't part of reality is not real. In contrast monotheists and polytheists tend to believe in "other realities" which are "outside" of the world of science and are experienced through emotions generated by the imagination. Our "world" includes "everything that is real" and excludes everything that is not real. We may not know what is and isn't real but our position is that whether or not we know it's status, that everything that is real is real and everything that is not real is not real. There are no other states where something is real in "another world" or in a "different reality". Our definition of reality would include all other realities that are actually real. We distinguish ourselves from Polyrealistic religions that are based on the idea that we are one of many realities and that there are separate realities where supernatural beings like deities live.
Monorealism also accepts the Sacred Principle of Scrutiny in that we apply the principles of science to determining what is and isn't real. We might believe something is true that we can't prove because we don't know everything. But if we believe in something it's because we have a reason to believe it's real. it's because we have some evidence, or a theory based on logic, or some mathematical model where at least the math works (string theory).
Monorealism excludes faith in that everything we believe in is subject to scrutiny. We have accepted that if we are proven wrong that we will change our minds. Faith excludes scrutiny and if you accept something based on faith then you are expected to continue to believe it no matter what.
Realists experience the world through understanding. We rely on logic, reason, wisdom, and scrutiny as the foundation of our beliefs. In contrast beliefs that require emotions and the imagination are not considered to be reliable.
Your Life Story is the record of your life from beginning to end. From the moment you are born till the moment you die. It is the record of your life. It is what you do. While we are alive we are writing our life story. We believe in self ownership and we take control of our lives and determine our own existence. When our life is over and if we accomplished anything worth remembering then our life story is remembered in the Tree of Knowledge and we become part of the sum total of human understanding.
Our life story is very important to us. It is the story of who we are. it is the ideas that we contribute to humanity. It is what we choose to be our role in existence.
Your Personal Evolution is the history of your existence. It is the record of your life. It is the sum total of what you are. It's your past, your present, and your future. It is the vector of your life. Where you are, where you have been, and where you are heading. From the moment you are born your life begins to evolve. You become part of society. Your evolution links into the evolution of the human race to become part of our collective history and your uniqueness and original ideas to the Tree of Knowledge.
The Vocabulary of War is language that is used in order to prepare people to go to war. Wars do not happen on their own. People have to have dialogue that leads up to war. The vocabulary of war is the dialogue that is used to create the kind of agreement necessary to create war. Without the necessary agreement a war isn't possible.
In order for a war to occur you have to dehumanize the enemy. You have to define an "us" and a "them" where "we" are justified through some noble characteristic and "they" are subhuman and therefore "deserve to die". The enemy has to be seen not as individual people but as members of some evil group who's destruction is necessary. The vocabulary of war is used to demonize people as vermin who are to be exterminated.
Peace begins with a commitment to resolve problems rather that trying to solve differences through killing. The Vocabulary of Peace are words and concepts that people use to bring people together and unite people and to humanize people as individuals. It is a vocabulary that gives respect to individuals and recognizes the intrinsic value of the individual. The Vocabulary of Peace forms the basis of a culture of peace.
The Vocabulary of Peace is a use of words and phrases that describe humanity as a single community that everyone in the world is a member of. It recognizes that we have subcultures of people with different and often conflicting ideas and values that lead to tensions between groups, but that these differences can be resolved by setting an example of mutual respect and putting out the effort to understand the other side enough to find a way to get along. The Vocabulary of Peace is the vocabulary that asks what we have in common and how we can build on that. It is a language that describes others as people who are like us and speaks of our commonality as fellow members of our planet.
Personal Evolution is about how your life evolves from the moment you are born to the moment you die. Our minds are exposed to many ideas and we are presented with many life choices that affect who we are and what we will become. Some say that you are what you eat and that might be true on a molecular level but in the Church of Reality we think it's more accurate to say that you are what you think. That whatever you decide to spend your time doing and what you think about defines who you are. And the process of moving from what you are today to what you will be tomorrow is called personal evolution.
We are a religion that values our free will. We value our Freedom and we take responsibility for who we are and what we do. Since we are committed to the pursuit of reality, we take control of our personal evolution to determine what we will become. We are our own creators in that we accept our circumstances and do the best we can with what we have to work with. If we don't like what we are we can choose to begin the process of evolving into what we want to be. And by choosing to personally evolve forward, all of humanity personally evolves forward.
Your Personal Evolution is the history of your existence. It is the record of your life. It is the sum total of what you are. It's your past, your present, and your future. It is the vector of your life. Where are you, where have you been, and where are you heading? From the moment you are born your life begins to evolve. You become part of society. Your evolution links into the evolution of the human race to become part of our collective history and to add your uniqueness and original ideas to the Tree of Knowledge.
The AH-HA moment is the moment that the idea of the Church of Reality really sinks in. You're reading about reality, you think reality is a good idea, you like the idea of realism but you're still wondering, "What is the point of having a Church of Reality?"
Then all of a sudden something inside you yells "YES! Ah-ha! That's it! Reality! Of course! I get it! It's so obvious." It all comes together. It all makes sense. When you say to yourself that "Yes, I am a Realist! I am going to make the pursuit of reality my Life Story." When this happens you have had the ah-ha moment and your ready to put Reality First by Accepting Reality.
Communion is the gathering of people to talk about and explore reality. Whenever two or more of you are gathered in the name of exploring reality, whether in person or online you are in communion.
In the Church of Reality the word Reality is our Sacred Message. Whenever someone thinks about reality the universe becomes a little smarter. So when people talk about reality then all who listen are thinking about reality together, and to us Realists, that is holy communion.
A Dogmatists is a person who is stuck in the past relying on ancient knowledge that one is supposed to accept as true without question. Dogmatists are the opposite of Futurist who focus on where we are going rather than where we have been. Dogmatists practice Dogmatism which is a Dogmatistic world view. Many Dogmatists are also Extinctionists who expect the future destruction of the world. We in the Church of Reality distinguish ourselves from other religions by embracing Futurism and rejecting Dogmatism.
A futurist is a person who has a forward looking philosophy. Futurists look in the Sacred Direction and are concerned with the Positive Evolution of the human race. A futurist is the opposite of a Dogmatist which is someone who focuses attention on the past. We in the Church of Reality are Futurists. We are a Futuristic religion that practices Futurism. We are also the opposite of the Extinctionists world view that the world will end in destruction. Our goal is The Star Trek Future.
Awakening is the acceptance of reality. To awaken is the equivalent of "being saved" in the Christian religions. To awaken is to make a personal commitment to reality as it really is and to reject fictional beliefs. Awakening happens in stages and is just a point of beginning, a point on the path of knowledge. The opposite is to be asleep. The metaphor is that a person is asleep and dreaming a fictional world and then wakes up to the real world. It is to go from the imaginary to the world of reality.
Intellectual Incest is a situation where too many people in a group all think alike and exclude legitimate diverse viewpoints. Not all points of view are intelligent arguments but sometimes when people become too uniform, they fail to evolve for lack of fresh new ideas. The concept is similar to genetic inbreeding. Realists are encouraged to exchange ideas with people who are not of the same mindset because it gives both individuals the opportunity to learn something new. When people hang out with people who agree on everything then there is less opportunity to learn from a new point of view and it leads to stagnation.
As the name implies, your worldview is your view of the world. It is the sum total of everything you believe in. It's everything you believe to be true, whether or not it is actually true. Your Worldview also includes your mental processes for evaluating reality. It includes the axioms or basic assumptions that you rely upon to process new information and integrate it into your personal reality or personal fiction.
In the Church of Reality our worldview is based on Reason. Our religion defines the fundamental axioms for which we experience reality. Our worldview is based on our choice to see reality the way it really is.
The Church of Reality is an Open Source Religion. The term first used by the religion Yoism, is analogous to open source software projects where people come together as a group to create software and allow everyone access to the source code and giving the opportunity to anyone who wants to become part of the project to participate in it's development. The Kernel which is the doctrine of the Church of Reality is open and evolving. We are the result of minds coming together to form a project to write the Operating System of Life. The project is evolutionary and it never ends. It allows our doctrine to change and evolve in the Sacred Direction. All knowledge of the Church of Reality is freely available for anyone to use under the terms of the GNU General Public License. Any derivative work of the Church of Reality must also be open source.
We are all the children of Mother Earth. All life on this planet is Earth's offspring. We were all raised here together, evolving into all the species of creatures that exist here today.
The Earth is the mother of all life on this planet. All living being on this planet are the Children of the Earth. This is where life on this planet evolved. We all grew up together here through billions of years of evolution. Life evolved from the elements of this planet that provided the right environment to create the hydrocarbon life forms that exist today. We don't yet know if other planets have life but it is logical to assume that life on other planets would be very different than life on this planet. Our DNA came from the primordial goo (for lack of a better term) that resulted from Mother Earth's unique environment.
Mother Earth is the mother of life on this planet. We grow together through evolution. All living beings here are related to us. Earth is our common home.
We are related to all other life on this planet. We all share common DNA. We are all one big interdependent family dependent on each other for our mutual survival living together on our mother planet. We are all distant cousins of the same parent. Realists are therefore environmentalists because when we take care of our mother we help to ensure our survival.
A Miracle is when a person decides that they are going to change the world, and then goes out and makes it happen. It is the act of one person, or a small group of people, who against the odds achieve greatness. People like Gandhi, a single individual, who was a Dreamer that freed a nation. People like Nelson Mandela who after spending 27 years in prison rose to become president of the nation that oppressed him. People like Bill Clinton, a poor Arkansas country hick, who at the age of 15 shook the hand of President Kennedy and decided in that moment that he would become president and made it happen. Another example of what will be a miracle will be if this church accomplishes its goals, changing the world for the better, and without degenerating into chaos.
In the Church of Reality a Miracle is an accomplishment that is so fantastic that it seems almost supernatural that it occurred.
Miracles in the Church of Reality are not supernatural. There is no magic in our miracles. Miracles are the true stories of heroes where people through hard work, wisdom, adversity, and sacrifice showed courage in the face of danger and took it upon themselves to envision a better world and to make it real. Miracles inspire us and remind us that a single individual can change the world with their mind. Everyone of us, if we choose that path, can be that single individual.
The Dreamers are people who use their minds and their imagination to see the big picture and to come up with new ideas that move humanity forward. Dreamers are people who love coming up with new ideas and figuring our how to make them work. The Dreamers are the ones who come up with the plans for the future. To be a Dreamer is one of the most important things a Realist can be. The Dreamers are the immortals whose ideas live forever in the Tree Of Knowledge. We remember the Dreamers of the past who created the world we have today. To be a Dreamer is to hold a position of honor within the Church of Reality. To be a Dreamer is worthy of being remembered as someone who created something good.
The Dreamers envision the future and bring it into Reality.
The Church of Reality needs more Dreamers. Everyone can Dream. It's something that everyone can learn. it's something that everyone can practice. The more you Dream the better you get at it. To Dream the Sacred Dream is to imagine the future and look forward through time with wonderment. The Dreamers are the creators of the Tree of Knowledge. That's how you start. Then you ask yourself what you can do to make part of that dream happen. You move the world with your mind even if it is a little at a time. If we all move the world a little forward every day we will fulfill our commitment to the Principle of Positive Evolution.
The Tree of Life is our genetic heritage through time. Like the Tree of Knowledge which represents the sum total of human understanding, the Tree of Life is also a mathematical tree rather than a plant. The Tree of Life represents all the genetic material on the planet that exists now and in the past and everything about the DNA and the life evolution process. Evolution is the growth of the Tree of Life. As we evolve forward in the Sacred Direction we grow the Tree of Life.
The Tree of Life is our evolutionary history. It's our ancestry all the way back to the very first organic molecules that formed on this planet that lead to life. It is how we are all biologically connected to each other. How we share common ancestors with all forms of life. We are all related to each other, and interdependent on each other. In a sense we are all part of a single living organism that includes all life on Earth. It's where we fit in the food chain. We are all part of the Story of Life on this planet. If you go back 55 million years the squirrel and I share a common ancestor. He is my cousin. I think we look alike.
Original Virtue is the assumption that people are intrinsically good. It is in opposition to Christianity's original sin - that everyone is so evil that they deserve to be tortured forever in Hell. It amazes me that people actually believe that. It is also in contrast to Objectivism that takes the position that people are intrinsically selfish and that selfishness is good and selflessness is evil.
Realists consider ourselves intrinsically good. Christians consider themselves intrinsically evil. Could we both be right?
The Church of Reality recognizes that humanity evolved higher social functions in order to survive and thrive. Our evolution towards being "good people" allows us to function as a healthy society. We don't lay bullshit mind trips on people to make them artificially feel unworthy and guilty in order to manipulate them. We are good people who respect each other and are helpful good citizens who do as well as we can with what we have to work with. We are not selfish greedy people and we don't need fear of fake deities to scare us into good behavior.
Some people look back and think that humans are inherently evil, pointing out any number of atrocities in history as well as current events. And there is plenty of bad stuff to find. But if you look at all the good stuff and really think about it there are probably at least 100 good acts for every bad one. Much of that is culture driven and if we work to improve the culture then we will raise our children to be even better than we are. We should also look at original virtue as a goal for the future so that as we evolve forward, future generations will be better than today's.
Teaching children shame is fundamentally wrong.
Many religions teach children to be filled with shame and guilt. They are taught that people are evil and that people are bad. This is poisoning the minds of children and is just plain wrong. We urge all people to rethink these sort of myths for themselves and to reconsider if you want to poison your children the way a church poisoned you.
Just as realists have their personal reality, believers have their personal fiction. Members of fiction based religions don't all believe the same things. Even in the most authoritarian of cults, the individuals often have very different perceptions of what it is they really believe in. Believers often talk about right and wrong as if they had moral certainty about their convictions but in reality they are not experiencing a common belief the way they think they are. In fact what they really have in common is the false idea that they all believe the same thing. But when people express their interpretation of their beliefs individually and freely, if they are allowed to do that, they are not very close at all.
The belief in God is an example of Personal Fiction because since God isn't real, or is at least hiding, the concept of God is created by the imagination of the individual believer. Each believer believes in a different God of their own creation.
Personal fiction is the fact that the believers in fiction based religion all believe a personal version of the fiction that is very different from those in the same cult mind. This is especially true of those who communicate directly with God because God doesn't exist and what people imagine is the word of God is a very different message from person to person. (Side note: If God had a consistent message it would be evidence that he actually existed.) Since personal fiction is fiction based, it varies more than a realist's personal reality. Personal reality is at least tied to objective reality that creates a common reference that ties realists together. Believers are tied together by their mythology and the mythology is a moving target.
Personal reality refers to your personal experience of reality. It is you experiencing reality from your point of view. Personal reality is reality as seen from your eyes and limited to your realm of experience and distorted by your mental flaws and whatever bad information you believe. It also incorporates an emphasis on the issues that the individual is personally involved in or interested in.
Personal reality recognizes that our perception of the universe is limited. We are not omnipotent and our brains can only handle a limited amount of information. We are also using a brain that is far less perfect than a computer and often gets things wrong. Personal reality is distorted by our own personality as well. However, it is what we have to work with and we have to do the best we can with what we have. Our personal reality is our perspective of The One True Reality that we are all part of. The Church of Reality is a Monorealistic religion in that we are all part of the same reality.
A believer is a person of blind faith. This is a generic term that references members of all faith-based religions. It includes Christians, Muslims, Jews, all of them. The term Believer refers to people who believe in something without a scientific or logical basis. They accept doctrine in an environment where questioning and scrutiny are either prohibited or discouraged. Someone who accepts information based on faith rather than facts and reason.
Armageddon is the failure of the human race. If Armageddon happens, then the Extinctionists have won. It would represent a failure of Realists to keep humanity off The Path of Destitution and Destruction. To Christians this term means that Jesus is coming back and many of them think that if they destroy the world that it will somehow force Jesus to return to save it. But the sad fact is that Jesus is fiction and if the Christians destroy the world then this planet will be just another lifeless speck of dust in the universe like trillions of other planets.
Actually, it is unlikely that we could destroy all life on Earth - just the humans. It will give the cockroaches a shot at being at the top in a few billion years. We selfish Realists want to keep humans in power.
Purification of Truth is taking a theory that we think is true and putting it to the test of doubt and scrutiny and applying scientific methodology to verify that what we think is true really is true. We do this so that we can catch mistakes and weed out information that isn't true, or to verify that what we believe still is true. Often it gives us a deeper understanding where something still is true, but we know more about it. Often the purification of truth leads us to other truths that we haven't yet discovered. Or it may cause us to find an error in something related to the truth we are purifying.
A sock puppet is a cult member. We call them sock puppets because they have surrendered their will to their masters and what they say are the words of the cult. They are completely dominated by the cult mind and are required to believe without question what they are told to believe. To become a sock puppet is to totally surrender your free will and surrender to a life of slavery.
An example of a sock puppet is a Jehovaha's Witness who comes to your door and when you try to have a conversation with them. It's like the person isn't even there. They just parrot a narrative that they are required to believe in order to stay part of the cult. Before a sock puppet can accept reality they have to realize that it will lead to them being thrown out of their cult.
The Kernel is the name for our Church Doctrine. It is a concept stolen from computer terminology refering to the Linux operating system kernel which is the core program that makes the system run. The First One is presently the maintainer of the Kernel. Other people who also work on the kernel shall be known as kernel developers.
The Kernel is the operating system of the human race. It is the realization of who we are and why we are here. It tries to put the great questions into context and to form a system for pursuing answers to the great questions of the universe.
In the Church of Reality, doubt is required. Doubt is the basis for the Principle of Self Scrutiny. Realists doubt everything. That's how we continually test ourselves to make sure that what we believe in is really real. Our doubt causes us to reexamine everything all the time to make sure we have it right. Doubt also gives us a deeper understanding of what we know. It helps us prune the Tree of Knowledge removing the dead parts so that the live parts grow stronger.
Interestingly enough, where doubt is required in our church, doubt is prohibited in fiction based churches. In Christianity doubt is the unforgivable sin. The one thing you are absolutely prohibited from doing in the Christian church is to think. Fortunately it is a requirement in our church.
A beacon is a Realist who attracts people out of the darkness and slavery of the Cult Mind and helps them see the light of the path of reality. In the Church of Reality we use this term for our ministers and clergy.
The opposite of a beacon is someone who puts out a fake light to lead people into the Cult Mind. We call them Bug Zappers.
Thanks to Brother Steve Doulis for the idea for this term.
A Bug Zapper is a person who leads people to the Path of Illusion, into the Cult Mind, causing them to Live the Lie. The metaphor is that a bug zapper is a device for killing insects. Insects are attracted to the light, but when they land they are instantly fried by electricity. A Bug Zapper is a person who uses light like a Lighthouse does but to the peril of the person attracted. Other religions use the term "False Prophet" to mean the same thing.
A natural religion is a religion that is based on reality and designed with the nature of humanity in mind. If religion really is the study of why we are here and where we came from then the answer to those questions must be found in the pursuit of reality the way it really is. The Church of Reality is dedicated in both name and mission to that task and is therefore a natural religion.
A natural or reality based religion has the characteristic that if the religion were reinvented from scratch that the new religion would be about the same as the original one. That is because there is a basis in reality or universal truths that create a guiding force to keep the belief system on track. In contrast, a fiction based religion would not be reproducible if reinvented from scratch. However, to different degrees all religions have some natural elements to them, like being against murder. It is no random coincidence that all religions just happen to agree that murder is wrong. That's because it is a concept that comes from reality itself.
One of the missions of the Church of Reality is to issue the Sacred Challenge to other religions to get them to accept self scrutiny. In doing so we are asking them to examine their belief systems to see what elements of their religion are based on natural law. We in the Church of Reality believe that other religions benefit from such challenges in that it helps their religion evolve in a positive direction. Any time we can get another religion to become more natural, the better off the world will be.
The Sacred Responsibility is to be the custodians of the future. It is up to us to look forward and see what challenges are in front of us and to look at them in a realistic manner so as to make better decisions. The Principle of Positive Evolution demands that we ensure that tomorrow is better than today and that we move forward into a better future. In order to do that we have to be wise and smart and we need to see opportunities and to avoid pitfalls. We are to see things coming and to think it through so that we don't have to deal with problems when it's too late.
As Realists, it is up to us to accept this Sacred Responsibility to be the people who step forward and say, "We will do this thing. We will make the world a better place." We accept that our evolution is in our hands and that our choices matter, and we will do what it takes to make sure our choices are the best possible choices under the circumstances. We are successful when we make sure that the Christians never see Armageddon.
The Sacred Symbol of the Church of Reality is the capitol letter "R" with a Halo over it. The letter "R" stands for Reality and the Halo represents that Reality is holy to us. This symbol is to us what the Cross is to Christians. It identifies our church and our belief system. It is also a trademark of the Church of Reality.
This symbol was the idea of Paul Gaskin who also created this art work. Paul will be remembered in the Tree of Knowledge as the person who manifested the Sacred Symbol. Paul also created the Church of Reality logo.
The Sacred Wonderment is - "are we alone in the universe?" We are here - on this planet - and we wonder - are there any other planets out there that also have life? Or - is this the only planet in the universe with life on it? If there is life - what kind of life is it? Are they as advanced as we are? Are they more advanced? When will we meet them - and what will happen when we do? If so - will we be able to get along with them - work with them? What would we do if a spaceship showed up tomorrow and made first contact with us? What would we want them to know about humanity? Would we be proud of who we are?
The Sacred Slogan is - "If it's real - we believe in it." This slogan is our commitment to the truth. It means that once we have determined that something is real, then we are obligated to believe it. Conversely, if we determine that something is bullshit, then we are obligated to not believe in it.
The Church of Reality is about reality and not about what we want to believe in - or if we could attract more members if we compromised a little. It's not about attracting the masses. The Sacred Slogan helps keep us on the Path of Knowledge.
I, Marc Perkel, am the founder of this religion. I therefore call myself "The First One". I am not a deity. I am not even much of a role model. I'm just an ordinary guy with an idea. The Church of Reality is not about me - it's about reality. I'm just someone who is trying to do a good job of getting this started in the right direction so that it is self maintaining and doesn't become corrupted down the line.
To attempt to accomplish something useful in the real world. In the context of the Church of Reality a mission is a commitment to a course of action calculated to accomplish something specific in the real world. The Church of Reality has The Sacred Missions that include asking the Sacred Question - issuing the Sacred Challenge - Growing the Tree of Knowledge. The Mission is the doing of the dharma of the Church of Reality.
Realism is the name of what we believe in. Buddhists believe in Buddhism. Realists believe in Realism. Realism is the practice of believing in reality.
Members of the church of Reality. Realist is the term we give to our religious identity. People who believe in Christ are called "Christians". When asked, "What religion are you?" we reply, "We are Realists."
Reality is what we believe in. The way things really are. Reality is that which doesn't go away when you stop believing in it. It's not our personal reality or our perception of reality or what we want reality to be. Reality is the way it is. It is objective reality. As Realists practicing Realism - we pursue the understanding of Reality.
Making a personal commitment to understanding reality the way it really is. Getting real is to give up your illusions about what you want to be real - or what other people want you to believe is real. Getting real is the process of personal growth in your commitment to reality in the practice of realism. It is to move in a direction away from illusion and distortion into a state of clarity and self discipline. Getting real involves reprogramming one's mind to accept reality as it really is and to move away from mythology and delusion.
A person's religious identity is the name of the religion that they identify themselves with. In this society people want to know, "What religion are you?" Generally they expect a one word answer with the name of a religion that expresses their religious identity. A person might say they are a Buddhist - or a Christian - or a Jew - or a Muslim - or a Hindu. These are examples of religious identities.
The Church of Reality provides a religious identity for Realists. The word Atheist for example doesn't describe what you believe in but rather what you don't believe in. The belief in reality isn't new but what this church does is to give a name to the belief in reality. One of the missions of this church is to establish the name Church of Reality and Realism as the practice of the religion so that when someone asks a Realist what religion they are - that they can say it and the listener has heard of it and understands what they mean. To that end the Church of Reality has a duty to realists through the Principle of Self Scrutiny to always preserve the intellectual integrity of this church so that people who truly believe in reality the way it really is can feel comfortable calling themselves Realists.
Members who are committed to understanding reality are "Explorers". This is the counterpart to "Followers" in other religions. Exploring is the process of expanding our understanding of reality the way it really is. Personal exploring is the understanding of ourselves and the process of getting real. But we also explore the reality around us and share our findings with others to grow the Tree of Knowledge. And we contribute knowledge freely through intellectual tithing so that others can build on our knowledge as we have built on the knowledge of others.
Group of Explorers on a Mission. To explore reality the way it really is we have to work together to accomplish things. We can't do things like launch telescopes into space by ourselves. In order to accomplish the mission we have to organize into crews and work together as fellow explorers to expand the horizon of knowledge.
An Explorer or group of Explorers who goes on a trip or involves themselves in a new activity for the purpose of understanding reality is on a "Quest". A quest is like a mission but more of a short term event where a mission is a bigger longer goal. A Quest would be more like taking a weekend to take your family to a science museum to learn about new things or to go on retreat for self exploration and getting real.
People who let others do their thinking for them. People who are not in control of what they believe in. People who have not taken personal responsibility to question their faith. People who refuse to ask the Sacred Question - "What is Real?" To be a sheep is to follow blindly a path where reality is excluded from the process.
Many sheep organized to follow blindly together. A group mind formed around a concept where reality is excluded from the belief process. A flock could describe members of a cult. People often surrender their good judgment to others in exchange for a sense of community - a sense of purpose - and a sense of self worth. They often surrender to an exploiter who fulfills these emotional needs in exchange for their blind devotion and economic resources.
A person who forces their religion on vulnerable people. People who intentionally deceive others and take advantage of their personal needs in order to lead them into a society of false beliefs. An illusionist who organizes people by manipulation of vulnerabilities at the exclusion of truth and reality.
An Exploiter can also refer to a person who takes advantage of religious people for political gain.
The belief in something that has no factual, logical, or scientific basis. Faith commonly involves a deliberate decision to ignore reality and to dodge scrutiny. In the realm of the known, faith frequently becomes merely an easy decision to ignore Reality and to choose to believe in something that reality suggests is false or to become completely indifferent to evidence that contradicts that 'faith'. In the realm of the unknown, faith is the choice to lean against the evidence and toward the unproven. Conversely, a hypothesis is a guess that leans toward evidence supported by logic and reason.
Key elements that indicate faith are:
Absolute Loyalty to a Position - Unwillingness to change your mind when you are proven wrong. Faith is a choice to believe something even when reality contradicts the belief. A Realist accepts the position that if one is proven wrong, one is expected to change one's mind.
Avoidance of Scrutiny - Faith-based believers tend to avoid scrutiny of their beliefs. Logic and Reason are declared to be inferior to belief based on emotions and the imagination. Questioning is considered to be either sinful or blasphemy; or that the belief cannot be tested because of achieved salvation through ignorance of reality and loyalty to one's belief first somehow overcomes reality. A believer will sometimes claim that there are "other realities" where the rules of the "physical world" don't apply.
Faith and Reason are held to be mutually exclusive. Things believed through faith can never be proven because if something is proven then faith is no longer necessary. "Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." Once an article of faith has been proven, it then becomes part of the world of reason. The process of proving something means that you have accepted the principles of science and scrutiny. If one tries to prove something then they also have to accept the possibility that it might be disproven. Without the possibility of being disproven, the proof is meaningless.
Anything that you can't question is not real.
Things believed through faith, by definition, are untested. One cannot determine through faith if what one believes is real. Fear that faith tested, might actually prove it to be false, makes faith weak. Two people having faith in opposite things, cannot determine what is real because reason, logic, and scrutiny to make the determination of what is real would expose the opposing faiths to the possibility that one, or both, are false. (See Faith Paradox).
Faith is fundamentally in opposition to the scientific process insofar as it specifically excludes any kind of truth-testing. When one disregards truth and reality, one's denial of reality has determinental consquences to oneself and others.
The Church of Reality is a Doubt Based religion. We reject blind faith. Our position is, any belief that is solely faith-based (in that it rejects scrutiny) is assumed to be not real. Our view is that anything real will stand up to scrutiny and questioning and that we are pursuing real reality as it really is. In order to do that we are required to examine everything to verify our positions. We accept the possibility that things we believe in may prove to be unreal and we are willing to change our minds when we find we have held a belief in an unreality.
Faith should not be confused with trust. Our human minds are limited and as a community we have to choose to trust other people to make determinations for us. When we get on an airplane we trust that those who are in the airline business know how to safely make the plane fly and land. A Realist has a responsibility to question faith and to always issue the Sacred Challenge to ensure that one has not dedicated one's life to a scam.
To us blind faith is a form of idolatry. Blind faith is Worshiping a False Truth. In the Church of Reality blind faith is a Golden Calf. Many religions require blind faith first. Religion expects belief without question. We do not. We embrace Doubt and Scrutiny. We put Reality First. We Accept the Truth. In our world view blind faith is the rejection of Reality.
A person who is so deep into religious mythology and controlled by the cult mind that they would believe the world was flat if they were told to believe it. The term is similar to a sheep but with a more extreme context.
A person who envisions the future as the destruction of the world. Armageddon. An Extinctionist is a person who is so blinded by faith and so dedicated to making sure that "their team wins" even if their team is the bad guys. They would destroy the world or move humanity into a society of religious slavery just to be on the winning team. An Extinctionist envisions negative evolution and sees the future as bleaker than today and lives a life that is destructive to the advancement of humanity.
Extinctionism is a very dangerous world view because it leads to irresponsible behavior and decisions. It is based on the idea that there is a next world and that this world is "evil" and deserves to die. Therefore it is OK to pollute the planet, or overpopulate, or to use nuclear weapons, because the omnipotent father figure is going to destroy this world anyhow and take all the good people to a better place.
We in the Church of Reality maintain a Futurist perspective. We see the future as what we decide to build and we take Responsibility for our actions because actions have consequences. We see humanity as not having an omnipotent safety net and that our survival is based on our ability to have good judgment. We therefore commit ourselves to Positive Evolution so that humanity progresses into the future knowing more about reality with each generation.
A person who pretends to be into reality who really isn't, but want's others to think he is. The commitment to reality has to be real. If you're faking it then why bother? (Thanks to Anna Wolk for this term)
A Realist who stands up for reality in the face of adversity or personal risk. Often reality requires bravery in order to stand up to what is right and true. It is often not easy and can be dangerous to expose exploiters and free their flock from a life of mental slavery.
In the Church of Reality "Are you saved?" means is the data on your computer backed up on another computer, hard drive, or tape? The Church of Reality reminds you to always back up your data because if you lose your data - it's gone! Never keep only one copy of data that is important. Hard drives eventually fail. Anything that isn't backed up is gone. Remember that the natural state of all machinery is broken.
For the Church of Reality's equivalent of "Being Saved" see Awakened.
The moment you realize that you've lost everything on your computer after your hard disk crashes and your data wasn't saved. If you are not saved - you might end up in Hell.
Starting over from scratch after losing everything on your computer and having no data backups. (Being Born Again is not a good thing in the Church of Reality)
One's personal commitment to the pursuit of understanding reality as it really is. A person who commits to believing in reality is said to be on the Path of Knowledge.
Also known as "living the Lie". To have committed your life to a religion and a way of life that is based in mythology and has no basis in reality at all. A person who was a member of another religion and was involved in charitable work that is objectively helpful to society would not be in this category. However, someone who dedicated their life merely to the pursuit of a religion that only poisoned the Tree of Knowledge with false information would be on the path of illusion. One of the missions of the Church of Reality is to issue the Sacred Challenge to inspire people to determine if what they are trying to do is of any importance in the real world and examine whether they are in fact just wasting their lives.
The Path of Destitution and Destruction represents the state of a society or culture that has:
turned its back on the real world,
has made so many bad choices that it is in serious trouble, and
is under the control of a Cult Mind.
When the leaders of a society believe that they are going to see the end of the world in their lifetime, we are heading towards or are already on The Path of Destitution and Destruction.
In such a situation it is the job of the realists to ask the Sacred Question, to send the Sacred Message, and try to get people to Become Real in the Sacred Moment. The very core of our religious morality is to uphold the Principle of Positive Evolution. We are committed to move society forward and to protect and defend the Tree of Knowledge and the Golden Router. We therefore must never allow society to go down the Path of Destitution and Destruction.
I didn't invent reality - reality invented me. Although we don't know how we got here or why anything exists - we know that reality created us. First there was this real world and somehow we are here.
The instinctual need to be connected to reality and to understand reality is within us all. We are the result of billions of years of evolution and we are descended from those who were best able to make reality a part of their lives. Understanding reality is a survival skill. Staying Real helps tip the odds in your favor so that when you do make a choice based on reality it is more likely to be a good choice than if you ignored reality. Evolution favors the realist and our very souls are ultimately rooted in the real world. No matter how strongly the Cult Mind controls us - we never lose the ability to Become Real in the Sacred Moment.
The Church of Reality issues the following Sacred Invitation to all the people of the world: "We ask you today to take a moment and think about Reality the Way it Really is. Let your mind wonder about wondering. Feel your mind thinking about thinking. Look around you and ask "What is really going on here?" How do you know that what you believe is really true? We ask you to allow reality into your life and to spend more time during your day to become Real in the Sacred Moment and let your thoughts become one with the real world. When making important decisions we invite you to consider reality as part of the process. We invite you to ask about everything and join us in the exploration of the world we live in.
Living the Lie is to be on the Path of Illusion. It seems to be the same thing as the Path of Illusion but not quite. The Path of Illusion represents your overall direction in life. Living the Lie is your daily activities in the here and now.
When you can no longer live the lie - it's time to unplug from the cult mind and come back to the real world. Sometime this is hard to do because reality isn't always a pretty picture. But - it is real. Because we are committed to moving forward in the Sacred Direction, we make the best of our Realty in the Sacred Moment so that the reality of tomorrow will be better than it is today. You do the best you can with what you have to work with.
One of our greatest strengths is our ability to organize ourselves into groups and to work together sharing knowledge between us. However this can be a great weakness if we organize around the wrong principles. If we are seduced into being part of a cult then we allow ourselves to be controlled by the cult mind. There is actually little difference between a healthy community and a cult. The main difference is that good heathy communities are based on reality and cults are based on illusion. It is not enough to go through the motions of being a good person. You have to do more than just make your life count. It has to count for something good.
A Realist is on the Path of Knowledge. Cults are on The Path of Illusion. It becomes a life of simulation and it's the difference between fake and real. A realist stays on the Path of Knowledge by putting reality first and always questioning themselves because they realize the importance of the Sacred Principle of Self Scrutiny. A Realist seeks reality - cults fear reality because if you are in a cult and you make a commitment to pursue reality the way it really is - one of the first things you realize is that you are in fact in a cult and you are wasting your life when you could be out there doing something real. But in order to make this kind of revelation you must be willing to unplug yourself and do your own thinking and take responsibility for your choices. If you are emotionally dependent on the cult mind for your sense of community and self worth then you shall remain enslaved and blinded to the real world.
Plugged in and Unplugging relate to your connection to the cult mind. Humans organize into groups in order to function. Sometimes it is good and sometimes it is not. People get addicted to cults because the cult gives them a sense of purpose of self worth. It gives them community. But it demands that they give up reality and become a mind slave. But you are dependent on them and they use you. This is what being "plugged in" means. You are plugged into the cult mind.
Unplugging is the process of disconnecting yourself from the cult mind. It is to decide that you can no longer live the lie. In your heart you know that what you are connected to isn't real. You see things going on that offend your sense of fairness and honesty. You feel reality calling you home. You want to come back to the real world and have reality change your life. But to unplug you have to disconnect yourself from the cult mind and the benefits that you have come to depend on. Until you unplug you will stay on the Path of Illusion rather than the Path of Knowledge.
Staying True - also known as the Sacred Discipline - is the self discipline that we Realists practice to stay on the Path of Knowledge and to become wise. All around we are tempted to join the cult mind and to believe in things that aren't real because we are pressured by our friends and families to plug into the cult mind. We are also pressured to accept a level of dishonesty because everyone is doing it. But as Realists practicing Realism we have a Sacred Duty to the Truth and to ensure that we are not Living The Lie and end up on the Path of Illusion, we have to do what it takes to Stay True.
Staying True is our commitment to the Principle of Self Scrutiny. We always ask ourselves the Sacred Question - What is Real? Are we really on the Path of Knowledge or are we just fooling ourselves? We are aware that those who are on the Path of Illusion are usually very sure they are on the true path. Those who are Staying True however are never sure they are on the true path because we respect the powers of illusion around us. All we can say is that we believe that we are trying to do the best we can under the circumstances and we hope that it is good enough. We realize that no matter how hard we try - that we too can be fooled.
Staying True is to respect the Sacred Principle of Humility. We Realists are a humble religion because we realize how small we are in a vast reality. We avoid the ego because if we desire self worth and recognition we open ourselves to being plugged into the Cult Mind. The Cult Mind can entrap us by giving us a false sense of importance in order to enslave us. There is nothing wrong with feeling good about ourselves if we accomplish something or feeling bad about ourselves if we fail - as long as we do it moderately. We avoid becoming addicted to praise and we refuse to accept shame because we are not self important. We can be ok because we try hard and we are trying hard to stay true.
The phrase "Praise and Blame" used together reflect the dichotomy of reward for success and punishment for failure. These concepts are married together because if you indulge in praise - then you suffer the shame of blame. Both come from the same flaw which is excessive self importance. When we accept the Path of Knowledge we do so in a humble way. The Sacred Discipline demands that we give up our self importance so as to immunize ourselves from the Cult Mind. We don't accept praise and blame nor do we inflict it on others. We are forgiving and our goal is to heal ourselves when we fail rather than to indulge in judgment and condemnation. (Thanks is Steven Gaskin for the idea.)
We as Realists are not "The Chosen Ones". We are not the chosen people. We make choices to (hopefully) better ourselves and we take responsibility for our choices that we make in a humble manner. But we are not special. We are merely people who serve the common good and try to live our lives in a way that values positive evolution and that we are humble, honest, caring people. We are not chosen because we reject the cult mind.
There are few absolute tests in the world to determine if you are on the Path of Knowledge or the Path of Illusion. But one sure way to tell that you are definitely on the Path of Illusion and plugged into the Cult Mind is if you are one of the "Chosen People". If you believe that you are "Chosen" then you are definitely Living the Lie and you are fully plugged into the Cult Mind. If you are chosen and you want to come back to the real world then one of the first steps is to become un-chosen. If you are someone "special" because God has chosen you - you are living a lie and it's all an illusion. You are deceiving yourself. You are being used. You are being enslaved. The Cult Mind has made you addicted to your ego and your sense of self importance. That is the hook that they draw you in with.
Cults suck you in by making you special and better than "those people". You are the "Chosen Ones" - they are the un-chosen. God has chosen you - and he has rejected them. You are going to spend eternity in paradise - they are going to spend eternity burning in Hell. You are righteous - they are unrighteous. You have been washed in the blood of the lamb - they are filthy sinners. I'm praying for you because I'm "saved" and you are "lost". We are God's chosen people and God gave us this real estate (the holy land) and we must kill the infidels to drive them out of the Holy City. We are good - they are evil. We the good must defeat the evil ones in battle. It is "us" against "them" in a "war" for the soul of humanity. You are either on God's side or you serve Satan. Sound familiar? That is how cults plug you in. And once you have become addicted - then you become unplugged from the real world - Living the Lie - and being enslaved on the Path of Illusion.
This is why the Sacred Principle of Humility is so important. We are all one people living together on this one planet (for now). We are all in this together and we are all going to take care of each other so that we all survive and prosper. We work for the good of the human race so that we can grow the Tree of Knowledge and we all can evolve positively in the Sacred Direction - forward.
This is the difference between the Cult Mind and the Path of Knowledge. Our commitment to reality the way it really is means that we have to give up being "chosen" and accept the humble path and do the hard work. This planet is just a speck of dust in a giant universe and we exist for but a moment in time. We as realists make the Sacred choices to pursue reality the way it really is. And we don't have all the answers - but we do know there are things that are not true - and being chosen by a deity is one of them.
To be not chosen doesn't mean that you are not part of any cult mind - but it's a good start on the road to cult-free living. The Sacred Principle of Humility prohibits people from being "chosen ones" and that kind of ego-based deception has no place in the Church of Reality.
Also known as Ego Masturbation - The act of self gratification by participating in activities to make you feel superior because you are a member of a group of the chosen and are therefore better than the un-chosen. The Cult Mind keeps its victims plugged in by offering them ego treats to satisfy their addiction to praise and an artificial sense of self importance. Self importance is addicting much like drugs are and the ego addict will perform acts of moral masturbation to get that "I'm better than you" experience. Moral Masturbation can be something that an individual does for self gratification - or it might be done as part of "Group Moral Masturbation". Group Moral Masturbation might take the form of public prayer where the object of the public prayer is to be seen by the nonbelievers in order to make a public statement that we are the Chosen People who were chosen for an important mission by a deity to do some important work that the omnipotent deity can't accomplish himself.
Judgment is also a common act of Moral Masturbation. The pointing of the finger to declare non cult members as "condemned" and sharing a fantasy that the universe is one big court and that there is a judgment day and that the criteria for judgment is not something that makes sense in the real world - but rather you are judged by your membership in a cult. They believe that your "sins" are forgiven by "faith" which is really the extent that they plug into the Cult Mind and suppress their connection to the real world.
The Sacred Principle of Humility tells us not to perform Moral masturbation on ourselves. As Realists we are tempted to look down upon the victims of cults as "stupid people" and take an ego thrill because we are "smart" and they are "dumb". But this too is Moral Masturbation and it is something that keeps us from evolving forward. Everyone does it to some extent. But we should watch ourselves (Principle of Self Scrutiny) and try not to play with ourselves that way.
Ego treats are rewards and acknowledgements of things accomplished. Technically Ego Treats do go against the Principle of Humility, but as social beings we do sometimes need some recognition for work accomplished and great accomplishments do deserve recognition. One can accept reward in the spirit that in doing so one is inspiring others to accomplish great things. But one must always keep in mind that this planet is still a speck of dust and not indulge in inflated self importance.
Ego Treats however are very addicting and can lead you towards being controlled by the Cult Mind. They can and are used as a tool to control others and it makes you dependent on your manipulators if you develop an appetite for Masturbating the Ego. So Ego Treats can be compared to eating candy. You can have a little when you are good, but don't get fat on it.
Having a firm grasp of the obvious. Wisdom is the ability to see the big picture. It often involves responsibility and a willingness to make the hard choices rather than taking the easy way out. It is often easy to fool one's self into believing what you want to believe rather than what you know is real. It is easy to try to take a shortcut when you know it's the wrong thing to do. It is easy to just go along with the crowd even when you know what the crowd is doing is wrong. Wisdom involves personal strength and integrity and a firm commitment to reality the way it really is.
Wisdom is the result of being a realist and making choices and observations based on reality. Can a wise person be out of touch with reality? Can wisdom flow from a religion that is based on mythology? Only to the extent that the mythology doesn't interfere with reality. After all - isn't reality the measure for which wisdom is tested? Therefore - to be wise is really a matter of perfecting one's personal relationship with the real world and one's personal commitment to the disciplines of realism.
The Tree of Knowledge is the collection of all things known to the human race. The species knowledge of humanity. Our collective knowledge. It is the sum total of all human knowledge.
The Tree of Knowledge is what separates us from the animals. We are able to communicate and share information and it is this collection of information that defines who we are as a species. What is the difference between humanity today and humanity 500 years ago? It's our Tree of Knowledge. Because of the Tree of Knowledge we know how to fly - how to use electricity - know how to build computers - and know how to cure diseases. If we as a species adhere to the Principle of Positive Evolution then in the future our Tree of Knowledge will be bigger than it is today and we will all live in a better world. We will be able to do things that we can't do today. The Tree of Knowledge is central to the Church of Reality and we as Realists dedicate our existence to the service of the Tree.
To introduce chaos or viruses into the Tree of Knowledge. To persecute explorers. To intimidate seekers of reality. To spread false and misleading information. To cause humanity to evolve in a negative direction. To put humanity on the Path of Destitution and Destruction.
A step towards true knowledge. We recognize that people make mistakes on the path to understanding. Being wrong and moving on is the normal process of discovery. It is OK to be wrong, as long as once you find out you were wrong, you move on to what is right. Being wrong is often part of the process of exploration.
The Frontier of Knowledge is the very front edge of human exploration and what we know. It is the line between what we just discovered - what we are in the process of discovering - and what we are just about to discover. Knowledge tends to be relational. If the Tree of Knowledge were viewed symbolically as a fractal, the Frontier of Knowledge would be the edge.
The Horizon of Understanding is almost the same thing as Frontier of Knowledge. If knowledge was a line, these two concepts would be "adjacent points" on the line with the Horizon of Understanding the "next point after" the Frontier of Knowledge. The Frontier of Knowledge represents the latest thing that we discovered. The Horizon of Understanding looks forward in the Sacred Direction to the very next thing we are about to discover. Of course - for those of you who are into mathematics - we all know that there is no such thing as adjacent points on a line because between any two points is and infinite number of other points. However - the illustration is accurate in the context for which it is presented. For those of you who are not heavy into math theory - I encourage you to wonder what I'm talking about.
Contributing new and useful information to the Tree of Knowledge. Intellectual Tithing is giving freely to the Tree of Knowledge. Giving back to the public domain. Almost everything we know today came from other people who are either living today or knowledge that was handed down. The reason you can read my words here is because we are using a public domain language that allows us to communicate thoughts and ideas. The Tree of Knowledge is the glue that hold society together and allows us to communicate and share new ideas.
But - as we receive so shall we give back. Because our ideas are based almost entirely on the ideas of others, we give back to the tree so that we can contribute to that for which we draw from. Our very thoughts - our awareness - our soul - is made of the thoughts of others. When we think we are thinking in a language that was invented by other people. The words we hear in our mind and the meaning of those words were invented by other people. And when we give back to the Tree of Knowledge through Intellectual Tithing - then who we are and what we have to contribute is passed back into the collective mind and we achieve a level of immortality. Every time we think of the work "wheel" or drive a car with wheels on it - the person who invented the wheel lives on. If we have something to contribute then we will live on too. People like Einstein, Newton, Tesla, and Darwin are all preserved in part in the Tree of Knowledge and are part of who we are today. If we give back then who we are lives on. We pass on ourselves biologically through having children. but we pass on our soul through Intellectual Tithing.
An example of Intellectual Tithing is putting up a free web site that contains information useful to other people. Writing software that other people can use freely is Intellectual Tithing. The Linux penguin symbolically represents Intellectual Tithing because it is an operating system that is an intellectual contribution freely available to humanity that has significantly enhanced our ability to explore reality.
Putting out the effort to make sure that information that you publish or otherwise add to the Tree of Knowledge is accurate and correct. To be truthful and honest. In contrast with being intellectually irresponsible and blatantly dishonest.
The understanding of understanding. Knowledge of what knowledge is and how it works. It could be described as reality itself becoming self aware. The processes of the pursuit of reality as it realty is.
The Science of Knowledge is an understanding of our own brains. How the mind works both physically and mentally. The mind is who we are and the tool we use to perceive reality and to connect to other minds through language with which we share our knowledge and understanding. It is the science that allows us to comprehend the Tree of Knowledge itself. How do we know what we know? How do we know it is real? What is knowing? How does the individual interface into the collective mind? What is a collective mind and who controls it? These questions are examples of the realm of the Science of Knowledge.
The study of what makes us make wrong choices. The things in our nature that lead us away from reality as it really is. Our brain is a flawed tool. We humans are herd animals and we tend to be persuaded by those around us and we often choose to believe in something because we want to be socially accepted rather than because it is real. The science of delusion is the understanding of the cult mind. It is to understand how people can be deluded by cults and to be able to form the mental disciplines to protect ourselves from the cult mind.
Our ability as the human race to share knowledge is our greatest strength and perhaps our greatest flaw. From the moment we are born we want to learn. We want to understand ourselves and the would that we exist in. We rely on others to teach us. We have a biological need to mentally connect into the herd mind and to become a useful part of society. We desire to be respected and to have the illusion that we are part of some greater purpose doing some greater good. And there are those who would exploit that and lead us down the Path of Illusion. We live in a good society but we are not perfect. There are flaws that are both deliberately exploited or innocently exploited that lead us away from reality. One of the missions of the Church of Reality is to understand this in an effort to be able to determine objectively is why we are on the Path of Reality - or the Path of Illusion.
Cults are everywhere. They are not just limited to extreme cultism - but to religion in general. It incudes political parties, clubs, sports fans, all groups that form a group identity for which an individual might be deluded into group thinking that ignores reality. To ensure that the Church of Reality never degenerates into a cult - we need to take the principle of self scrutiny seriously and study ourselves to develop the science to be able to determine what is real in spite of our flaws. The Science of Delusion is the term we use to study ourselves to determine if we are on the right track and to protect ourselves by understanding how we are exploited.
"What is Real?" (Also known as The First Question) Variations of the Sacred Question include, "Is this Real?" and - to a lesser extent - any question that tests any assertion on the basis of reality. The Sacred Question embodies the very reason for the existence of the Church of Reality.
A common misconception about the Church of Reality is the idea that the Church of Reality has all the answers. The Church of Reality is not here to answer the question "What is Real?" but rather to make a religious commitment to asking the question and making Reality the standard. We put Reality First.
It is up to science and exploration to answer the question of what is real using the Sacred Method commonly known as the Scientific Method. The Church of Reality is about the asking of the question. We are Explorers not Followers. We don't believe based on Faith. When one is Living in the Truth one asks the Sacred Question.
We as Realists have made a personal commitment to the pursuit of reality the way it really is. This choice is a religious choice. Other religions have made the religious choice to dedicate their lives to fiction and mythological beliefs, what we call Worshiping a False Truth. The Sacred Question defines who we are as a religion and is the core concept of our Religious Identity. The question sends the Sacred Message that we believe that reality is important and that we want to elevate the status of reality in the collective group mind. We ask the Sacred Question as an expression of our core beliefs and to express our moral conviction that the pursuit of reality the way it really is is better than the Path of Illusion or Worshiping a False Truth. To ask the question gives importance to pursuing the answer.
The Sacred Moral Question is - "Is this a Good Thing?" It cannot be separated from the related question, "What is Good?" It is indispensable in the quest for a fair and just society where people take reality into account in deciding the great moral and ethical questions. Often the rules of society are based on other things than what is in the best interest of the people. There are issues for which it is genuinely difficult to determine a system that takes all factors into account. To this end the Church of Reality poses the Sacred Moral Question in the hope that it reminds us to include in our decision making process the question "Is this a good thing that we are doing based on reality--and can we do better than this?" Goodness and Reality should always be considered in any process to determine a moral issue or an issue of law.
The Sacred Message is the word Reality. It makes reality important. To say the word reality and real sends the sacred message. It causes reality to become more important in the thoughts of the listener. The Sacred Message causes the listener to become Real in the Sacred Moment. It reminds people that reality should be considered in people's daily lives and in their decision making processes. Sending the Sacred Message is to advertise and promote reality. To say the Sacred message is to issue the Sacred Challenge. The Sacred Message should become part of the vocabulary and spoken or written as often as possible. The Sacred Message is to inspire the reader or listener to ask the Sacred Question and to raise the importance of reality in society.
What is our future going to be like 100 years from now? The Holy question makes us aware that our decisions that we make in the Sacred Moment determine if we will evolve in a positive direction or towards extinction. In asking the Holy Question we become aware of our responsibilities in the here and now and about what we are doing and why we are doing it. The Holy Question inspires us to be wise and responsible and to wonder about what we can achieve together. And to acknowledge that it is our responsibility to maintain the dream of a better tomorrow.
The Holy TV show is Star Trek. Star Trek is the Holy TV show because it is a show that envisions a future, The Star Trek Future, where we have evolved in a positive direction towards a future that is better than the one we have today. In Star Trek we have put our race and national differences behind us and we have united together as one planet to reach out into the universe and make peaceful contact with other life forms that we find as we explore the universe. Star Trek inspires our imagination and causes us to become One with the Tree as our minds are led to contemplate the Holy Question - "What will the future of the human race be?" Star Trek honors the Sacred Direction and the Principle of Positive Evolution as well as many other Sacred Principles of the Church of Reality.
The Sacred Personal Question is, "What do you want to be remembered for in the Tree of Knowledge? When you are gone - what of your life are you going to leave behind?" The Sacred Personal Question makes one aware of our own existence and what our place in the world will be. Will we be remembered for accomplishing something great? Will we be remembered for doing something terrible? Or - will we do nothing of any significance and be forgotten in the Tree of Knowledge? The only form of immortality that we know about for sure is how we will be remembered. We ask therefore that you consider whether how you will be remembered is important to you.
The Sacred Duty is to Grow the Tree of Knowledge and to ask the Sacred Question for the purpose of helping the human race evolve in the Sacred Direction. The Sacred Duty is more than just giving lip service to the idea of reality. We as Realists take the practice of Realism seriously. The Sacred Principles are the core of our being and we dedicate our lives to the nurturing of the Tree of Knowledge. The Sacred Principles define the fabric of our society and the basis for moral structure and the concept of right and wrong. The Sacred Duty is to actually take this seriously and to bring our wisdom into the real world and shape the moral and ethical fabric of society.
The Sacred Direction is to move forward, to evolve in a positive direction, to go from worse to better. It is to grow - not shrink - the Tree of Knowledge. It is to look forward into the future and not be stuck in the past. We choose to move onward and upward. We seek progress. We shun setbacks.
The Sacred Direction is a religious choice that separates the Church of Reality from pure science. In pure science the universe is stars exploding and rocks in space bumping into each other. This planet is but a speck of dust in a galaxy of billions of stars in a universe of trillions of galaxies. And our short lives are but an instant in time. If this Milky Way galaxy were to explode tomorrow - it would take 2.2 million years before anyone in the next galaxy knew about it - assuming there is an anyone in the next galaxy to know it. In pure science, whether we progress or annihilate ourselves makes no difference. Whatever happens is whatever happens.
It boggles the mind to comprehend how totally insignificant we are in the cosmic scale of things. However - as Realists practicing Realism - we make a choice to evolve in a positive direction. We decide that our existence is significant at least to us and that progressing forward is better than extinction and annihilation. These choices are arbitrary choices we make based on our own (selfish) perspective. And because these choices are arbitrary - they are in fact religious choices.
We as Realists have chosen to separate "right" from "wrong" and to put value in progressing forward. These are the Sacred Choices that we make, and these sacred choices lead to our Sacred Principles, all of which ultimately come down to our decision to move in the Sacred Direction. The sacred direction is our core religious belief that becomes the basis for our moral values. The Sacred Direction is what establishes the Church of Reality as a religion as opposed to a branch of science.
The Sacred Network is the Internet. Also known as the "Golden Router" or "Sacred Router". It is the technology where we communicate - exchange ideas - store our history - and make information available so that we as a race can grow together and explore reality as it really is.
The Internet is sacred to the Church of Reality because it is a tool that allows our minds to work together to explore reality the way it really is. We establish the Principle of Freedom to, in part, protect the Internet for those who would suppress free thought for their own personal agenda. It is absolutely necessary for us to practice our religion that the Internet be a forum of free thought and the free exchange of ideas. It allows us to form a group mind and to coordinate our efforts to explore, to grow, and to evolve in the Sacred Direction.
The Internet represents a significant step in the evolution of the human race. Our evolution moved from the physical to the mental as we developed the ability to communicate. We developed language - then written language - then the printing press - then radio - television - and now the Internet. The Internet is the birthplace of the Church of Reality and we as a church would not exist except for the Internet and the free expression for which it stands. And to that end we respect this accomplishment and give it the credit which is due and raise the status of the Internet to the level of being the Sacred Network.
The Sacred Moment is Now. To "be here now" is to be in the sacred moment. This is the moment that decisions are made in. The moment where we experience reality in real time. We learn from the past and we look to the future. But Now is where we live.
The Sacred Moment is the moment of power - the moment of decision. As you are reading these words you become aware of your existence in the now. This is the point where you are making your decisions as to who you are or what you will do next. You can decide right now to stop reading this - or you can choose to read on. Now is the moment that you control and the time in which all choices are ultimately made. Therefore now becomes that Sacred Moment in the Church of Reality.
Being Real in the Sacred Moment means that you are thinking about and asking the Sacred Question - What is Real? The Sacred Moment is where your life is being lived by you in real time. Sometimes you are at work - or planning dinner - or watching television. There are things that are done in the Sacred Moment. But - some of your time is spent wondering what is real. As you read this you are wondering about and thinking about reality in real time. When you are thinking about reality you are Being Real in the Sacred Moment.
Being Real in the Sacred Moment causes everyone - no matter what religion you are - to become a Realist in that moment. A member of the Church of Reality is a person who has made a personal commitment in their heart to pursuing reality the way it really is. However - reality and realism are not the exclusive domain of this church. Reality existed long before this church existed and reality will be around long after the church is gone. No matter how controlled a person is by the Cult Mind - reality is always a part of everyone's soul and in their hearts everyone want's to come home to the real world. The Call of Reality is heard by every living person and no one can ignore it forever.
The Sacred Gift is the gift of reality. This term is used in "giving the Sacred Gift" or "Receiving the Sacred Gift" meaning to help someone get real or to allow others to help you get real.
Also known as Praying to the Tree is to take a moment to reflect on reality - the way it really is - and to not only wonder what is real - but to reflect on the importance of Reality in our daily lives. We give thanks to those in our society who do the hard work to make sure that reality is considered in making decisions that affect our lives. When we reflect on the Tree of Knowledge - the sum total of human understanding - as we look around us in humble amazement and thankfulness of those who came before us and whose thoughts and discoveries are part of who we are today. Who we are and how we live has been given to us through the Tree. We put our energy back into the Tree by being Real in the Sacred Moment.
Every time that any person wonders about reality or asks the Sacred Question they "Become One with the Tree". At that moment they open their minds and hearts to reality - the way it really is - and they accept the importance of reality in their daily lives. This is not only good for the individual who becomes "One with the Tree" but it is good for the Tree because it inspires the individual to think about the real world. Becoming One with the Tree (hopefully) will cause some people to contribute of themselves though Intellectual Tithing so that something of themselves lives on for future generations.
To Become One with the Tree is to realize that we are all part of the Tree of Knowledge and that the Tree of Knowledge is in us. Our very thoughts are made of words that were handed down through the generations and our knowledge comes from those who taught us. We live in the Sacred Moment processing this knowledge and adding to it so that those who come after us will have more to work with than we had. To be One with the Tree is to give thanks for what we inherited and to add something of ourselves that is worth being passed on to the future.
The Sacred Challenge is to challenge other religions and other belief systems on the basis of if what they believe is real. It is not necessary to convert the world to Realism but one of the missions of the Church of Reality is to raise the importance of reality in the minds of our neighbors of different faiths. We feel that challenging religions on the basis of reality improves their religions and helps make the world safer and saner for everyone. Religions that get too far away from reality can become a menace to the world. They might think that God wants them to be terrorists - or God wants them to start a war. We believe that faith with eyes open is better than blind faith.
The Sacred Challenge comes down to a simple question that this church asks of other religions. The question is - "There are many faiths who all believe that their faith is the true one - and that they are directly inspired by God and other miracles as written in various holy books. Yet these faiths believe different and conflicting things. Clearly some of these religions have to have it wrong - yet their beliefs are as deeply rooted as your own. How do you know that what you believe in is real? How do you know that you are a member of the true religion and that some other religion isn't real and you are just being fooled? How do you know you are the one that is right?"
Of course - as Realists - the Sacred Challenge applies to us more than anyone else. Should this church ever abandoned reality - it should be dissolved. And to that end the Church of Reality has established the Principle of Self Scrutiny as one of its Sacred Principles to always challenge ourselves as to what really is real.
When you change your life and become an active realist - committing your life to the Sacred Missions - you are said to be on a the Sacred Journey. The Sacred Journey is a life that is (hopefully) fuller and richer that Living the Lie.
A Church of the Mind exists not only in the physical realm but also in the mental realm. The Church of Reality is a Church of the Mind. Besides having members who identify their belief system as Realism, in the Church of Reality we also recognize that all people have moments in their life where they are Real in the Sacred Moment. During these moments when a person is asking the Sacred Question they become a Realist for that short period of time.
Part of the reason to spread the Sacred Message is not just to convert people to Realists but to induce people of different faiths to become Realists if but for a few moments. The transformation of individuals to Realists is not limited to full members. We also include converting people if but for only a few minutes to Realism. One of our goals is to get people to spend more time being Real in the Sacred Moment. Our church spreads in the realm of the mind converting people not just one person at a time - but one minute of your life at a time. We want people to think about Reality all the time - not just a few times a year.
The Church of Reality can also be called the Cult of Reality in that we live in a world of both logic and reason and mental manipulation. The Question is always asked "How do we know that this church won't degenerate into something terrible like so many other religions have?" And - the short answer is - we don't know. After all - if the church of Reality ever became a cult - we would be sure that we were not one.
This church does use mental manipulation the same way many other churches do. People are programmed to think in terms of religion and the terminology used by this church is chosen to fit those same patterns so as to slip into the mind of the listener and cause their mind to respond in a predetermined way. We abuse the word "Sacred" as a marketing tool to get people to think about this church. And - it does raise the "Sacred Moral Question" - is this a good thing?
One could say that the ends justify the means and this is the way the Tree of Knowledge is wired. But there is a difference between what is necessary and what is ideal. This church uses the same mental tricks as cults do to spread what we believe is the truth. And - stating this encourages us to look at ourselves from the perspective of Self Scrutiny. And - there will be people who join the cause of reality - not as fellow explorers - but as followers. And that raises important questions about who we are and how we do what we do.
The sum total, or any subset of the sum total, of all that is real. There are things that are real and there are things that are not real. The Truth refers to what is real. Bullshit refers to what is not real.
A false belief system that obscures reality and oppresses the understanding of understanding. A bad or corrupt judicial decision that becomes precedent. It is a piece of bullshit that infects the Tree of Knowledge and fools people into believing in things that are not real. A virus is more than just bad information. It is bad information that spreads throughout the Tree of Knowledge and acts like an infection causing people to come to the wrong conclusion based on bad information.
The concept of a Virus goes beyond mere mistake. It generally involves the deliberate dissemination of false information in order to deliberately obscure reality and cause society to make decisions that favor the selfish interests of the virus spreader rather than the good of society as a whole. This kind of activity is a sin against the Tree of Knowledge. We live in a society where some individuals who put their own interests ahead of the common good use viruses to steal at the expense of truth and honesty.
The Church of Reality - through its research into the Science of Deception and the raising of the importance of reality in society has, as one of its goals, to be able to immunizes the Tree of Knowledge from these viruses of the mind and to identify bullshit and to label it as bullshit. The Church of Reality commits itself to the task of being an anti-virus and using its resources to counter the efforts of those who use lies and deception. We fight misunderstanding with understanding in order to move in the Sacred Direction.
Using the terminology of the Church of Reality in order to make it part of the human vocabulary resulting in getting people to become interested in the understanding of understanding. Talking the Talk is saying the Sacred Message - talking about reality. It's bringing reality up. It's asking the Sacred Question - Is this Real? What is real here? Talking the Talk introduces the Church terminology into the group mind and causes the listener to think about reality. It helps make the Church of Reality part of the Tree of Knowledge and it affects in a positive way how the human race makes decisions.
Performing the dharma of the Church of Reality. It's when you quit just talking and go out and make it happen. Sometimes talking is enough. Sometimes talking helps. But sometimes you just have to be the one who gets up out of their chair and makes it happen in the real world. There comes a point sometimes where if you don't do it - it doesn't get done. Walking the walk is the act of making it happen.
The Sacred Missions is the dharma of the Church of Reality. These missions define what we as Realists do. And it is what we do that defines who we are. The Sacred Missions are also an attempt to explain what the Church of Reality is in a short document.
In the Church of Reality dharma is the doing of doing. Each moment represents a choice that we make that affects the next moment. Your dharma is the course of your life based on these individual choices. One's life is the sum total of one's dharma. One's life is the integer of one's dharma. And one's dharma is the first derivative - (to use a calculus concept) of one's life. Dharma is the act of living. It's what you make of your life.
The dharma of the Church of Reality is the Sacred Missions. It is what we do together as a community.
Pondering the Great Questions otherwise known as the Wondering about Wondering - is one of the things we do to explore reality and as a mental exercise to keep our minds in reality based thinking and to keep us sharp. Some of the Great Questions include:
Why does anything exist? Why is there something rather than nothing?
Does "fate" exist? Is there a "fixed future?" Is every moment the mathematical progression of the previous moment - or - is there randomness on any level? If the "big bang" happened again exactly the same way in a parallel universe - would you still be in that universe 15 billion years later reading this web page? Do we really have any free will or is all of reality predestined on a fixed course that nothing can effect?
Is there life on other planets and is it intelligent life? I think most people believe that other planets at least contain primitive (virus like) life. But how many have had significant evolution? Could this be the only planet with life that has become self aware? Am I the smartest being in the universe? (That's a scary thought!) Are there beings far more advanced than we are?
What is the future of mankind? (Actually - this is the Holy Question - but it is also great) Where are we going? How far can we go? What will life on Earth be like 200 years from now? Or 2 million years from now? What technologies will we develop? What will society look like? Is it a future that will be a good future or will we become something horrible?
How do we know what is real? How do we know that what we believe is real really is real? How do we know that we aren't just fooling ourselves. How do we know that what we believe isn't just a result of being part of the Cult Mind? How do we know any of this is real and that we don't have a chip in our brain that is artificially creating this life experience? How do we know that we are not just living in a simulation?
These questions are examples of the Great Questions that we are Realists ponder and discuss. We are Explorers and we are exploring our tiny piece of the universe with our limited minds and tools. The Great Questions represent the challenge before us and they keep us focused on reality and away from the Cult Mind.
Being forced to believe in things that are not real. To endure injustice. To be chilled from pursuing reality as it really is. To be denied the understanding of understanding. To be required to behave in a way that lacks ethics and honesty. To be forced to live the lie. Oppression is to be forced to be silent with respect to the truth. To be denied the freedom to practice Realism and to explore reality the way it really is. To be denied the right to express our thoughts and to share them with others. To be cut off from the Tree of Knowledge.
It is oppressive for us to be forced to participate in the rituals of other religions. To be forced to acknowledge deities which don't exist or choose to remain invisible to realists. To endure living in a society that is not religiously neutral - a society that is dominated by another religion. To be forced to endure a morality structure that is based on mythology rather than reality. It is oppressive to be forced into fighting a war that is really between other religions and is a battle for religious dominance. It is oppressive to be dominated by a government which is dominated by a mythology based religion. It is oppressive to have to pay taxes to support the activities of mythology based religions.
Our justice system. Our society. Our rules and laws. It is the current system. Society is the Operating System of Life.
The concept of the Operating System of Life is a comparison to a computer's operating system. The computer runs a program that is the operating system. It doesn't do anything itself but creates the environment for which application software can run in. It is the structure that allows the computer to do useful work.
Similarly, the government and society are our operating system. It creates the infrastructure that we live in and work in. It includes the Internet as well as all forms of communication. It involves food distribution, education, law, justice, roads, energy, the environment, medical care, everything involving the fabric of society. Religion and the Tree of Knowledge are also part of the Operating System of Life.
Our dharma of the Church of Realty includes a commitment to improve the Operating System of Life. We are to be involved in helping to make sure society runs smoothly and is fair and just for all. Because we acknowledge that growing the Tree of Knowledge is central to our exploring reality as it really is - part of our mission is to ensure a better society in order to grow our understanding of understanding. We therefore commit ourselves to supporting the infrastructure of society and the study and support of the Operating System of Life.
To be /root is to be a monk of the Church of Reality who is committed to the Path of Knowledge. The concept of being /root is taken from the Unix operating system. Root is the super user who maintains the system. To be root is to be in technical support and to be the person responsible for keeping the system running. In the context of the Church of Reality - /root is to be of service to humanity and to provide technical support to the human race. It also involves a commitment to the service and maintenance of the Tree of Knowledge and to the Operating System of Life.
To be /root is to live a life of service to the human race. You might not be a major contributor to the Tree of Knowledge - but you might be the support person who makes it possible. Steven Hawking is a great physicist who will forever be remembered for his contributions to the understanding of or universe. But there are people who feed him and put him to bed at night and dress him in the morning who make it possible for him to do his work.
To be /root is to make more than an ordinary commitment to supporting the exploration of reality as it really is. To be /root is to dedicate your life to the task of making it happen. To make the sacred direction the central focus of your existence. To endure personal sacrifice for the good of society. To feed the hungry - to give shelter to the homeless - to heal the sick - to give comfort to the dying - to be there when you are needed. In that respect it is the dharma of the Church of Reality to actively support this work and therefore established monks to be known as the Order of Root to do the good works necessary to hold the fabric of society together.
In the Church of Reality an Angel is a caregiver. Angels are people who give of themselves to take care of people in need. In this church anyone can become an Angel in this lifetime. All that you have to do is go out and do it. Being an Angel is a reflection of our Principle of Compassion.
A Developer is a person who is a monk in the Order of Root who is a visionary and who's visions inspire projects in the real world. A developer is a person who comes up with ideas and actually makes them work in the real world. Sometimes it's a visionary with money who funds projects and hires the right people to make it all happen. A developer is a realist who decides that they can make it happen and then goes out and does it.
A maintainer is a person who is in charge of a project and who takes responsibility to see the project through and keep it working. A Developer might find a Maintainer to be the person who takes the initial concept and resources and makes it their goal in life to maintain the project. The director of a non profit organization would be the maintainer. The developer might sit on the Board of Directors.
What happens to you when you die? What part of you continues to exist beyond the grave? There's a lot we know about that and a lot we don't know. As to what we don't know - it is the role of the Church of Reality to encourage the exploring of that question. As to what we do know - that can be divided up into three categories.
The corpse, if left out in the open is eaten as food by animals and bugs and eventually fertilizes plants and dissipates into the other discarded organic matter of the planet.
If you have children then your genetic makeup is passed on in a form that is 50% diluted with each passing generation. Even genetically your DNA becomes diluted to the point of being barely identifiable as it is mixed generation after generation with the DNA of other people.
Finally - who you were as a person lives on in the Tree of Knowledge; what you accomplished and contributed that is worth remembering. If you do nothing significant and contribute nothing then you will be forgotten. Due to new technology however - using computers - the record that you existed at all might be preserved. But as we go back in time there are people who lived their lives and contributed nothing of any significance that were remembered and are now totally forgotten. There are many societies that lived for a time and totally died out without anything left save for some bones that we are just discovering. Who they were - how they lived their life - what they accomplished - their thoughts - their feelings - who they loved - are all gone.
There are however those who lived long ago who are remembered. They are remembered as being someone who contributed to the Tree of Knowledge. Einstein is remembered for discovering relativity. His contribution was so great that we preserve a lot of information about who he is and what he did. We remember his name and his accomplishments are with us today. This is a form of immortality because he is with us in our minds and in our experience of life. And because of our technology, more of him is stored than of great people of long ago.
For example - we don't know who the person was who first invented the wheel. Or if the wheel was something that was invented in multiple societies and passed on. The wheel is still with us and lives in the Tree of Knowledge. Whoever gave the wheel to the Tree lives on even though we don't know who this person was or what kind of a life he/she had.
In the Church of Reality - to be remembered in the Tree of Knowledge is the best hope for immortality that we know of that really exists. So if you want a shot at living forever in some form - then contributing to the Tree of Knowledge is your best shot. Maybe I will be remembered for starting the Church of Reality. And maybe I won't. If the Extinctionists win - we might all be forgotten.
Where everyone goes when they die. The term /dev/null is the name of the Unix black hole device where you put data to be redirected into nowhere. It represents the ultimate nothingness. Non-existence. It's the place where all your deleted files and deleted email go. It's where all the windows you closed are. It's where characters go when they scroll off the top of the screen. Unless you are remembered in the Tree of Knowledge - your future is probably /dev/null.
A web site named The Archive is storing millions of gigabytes of data of the history of the Internet. Some day in the future this information will be able to be mass processed in a way that will give us insight into the history of the beginning of the web. The Church of Reality therefore declares the Internet Archive to be a sacred historical shrine and that it should be preserved indefinitely for its historical value.
The accumulation of all raw information accessible to the public. This used to mean libraries but now it's the information on the Internet.
Newsflash
The IRS has approved the 501(C)3 tax exempt status of the Church of Reality.
Please link to us, discuss us in online forums, and blog about us. Every time anyone thinks about reality the world becomes a little smarter.
Spelling and Grammar errors? spelling@churchofreality.org - please identify page and location in the page of the error. The Church of Reality is a non-prophet organization. "Reality®" and "Church of Reality®" are registered trademarks of the Church of Reality.